freedom camping in vehicles bylaw rodney local …€¦ · 295ian smith rodney 1 308 296amanda...
TRANSCRIPT
FREEDOM CAMPING IN VEHICLES BYLAW
RODNEY LOCAL BOARD SUBMISSIONS
VOLUME 1
11 TO 518
Submission# First Name Surname Organisation Name Local Board Volume Page
11 Mike Weston Rodney 1 1
12 Chris Allan Rodney 1 4
41 Sean Thomas Rodney 1 18
43 Nathania Widjanarko Rodney 1 21
56 Darren Stevens Rodney 1 24
58 Steve Reynolds Rodney 1 28
65 Liz Sharek Rodney 1 35
69 Kerry Johnson Rodney 1 39
83 Fleur Coleman Rodney 1 44
86 Carol Abley Rodney 1 49
94 Gill Adshead Rodney 1 53
144 Julie Paul Rodney 1 57
145 Wendy Colville Rodney 1 60
147 Leanne Vincent Rodney 1 64
149 Considine Susanne Rodney 1 67
155 Stuart Caulfield Rodney 1 70
163 Paul Allen Rodney 1 75
165 Maleko Resident Rodney 1 78
173 Evelyn Wright Rodney 1 85
181 Stuart Windross Rodney 1 96
182 Tim Scholes Rodney 1 99
185 Eric van Essen Rodney 1 111
190 Peter Simunovich Rodney 1 114
192 Tony Lovelidge Rodney 1 123
198 Laura Gardner Rodney 1 126
203 Paul Heiplik Rodney 1 129
205 Chris Walton Rodney 1 134
208 Jonathan Parminter Rodney 1 139
219 Warren May Rodney 1 143
221 Dave Shanks Rodney 1 147
222 ROY LITTLE Rodney 1 151
223 Bronwyn Wilde Rodney 1 154
224 Harry Wenman Rodney 1 159
225 Simon van Rossum Rodney 1 162
227 Renee Beckett Rodney 1 167
233 Martin Halliday Rodney 1 172
235 Andrew Walker Rodney 1 181
236 Malcolm Wallace Rodney 1 184
239 stu handford Rodney 1 187
248 Cameron Pearson Rodney 1 191
250 Stephanie Cave Rodney 1 194
254 Yvonne Carleton Rodney 1 198
264 Mark Ostermeyer Rodney 1 203
268 Mary Logan Rodney 1 207
274 Suzanne Service Rodney 1 210
283 Eleanor Wenman Rodney 1 214
285 Kate Dunn Rodney 1 218
286 Barbara Hagen Rodney 1 303
295 Ian Smith Rodney 1 308
296 Amanda Bennett Rodney 1 311
300 Gavin Brough Rodney 1 315
306 Stan. Armiger Rodney 1 318
309 Philip Beech Rodney 1 321
313 Gay Williams Rodney 1 328
314 Christine Dormer Rodney 1 333
317 Bo Gerth Rodney 1 338
321 Linda Stevens Rodney 1 344
325 Louise Wallace Rodney 1 349
327 Kerry Pool Rodney 1 353
Submission# First Name Surname Organisation Name Local Board Volume Page
330 Shona Scandrett Rodney 1 356
331 Stephen Hamilton Rodney 1 359
332 Peter Pettit Rodney 1 364
345 Robert Buckett Rodney 1 368
349 Michael Whaley Rodney 1 372
356 Gaye Rowe Rodney 1 375
357 Campbell Armstrong Rodney 1 376
359 Adrianne Barrrie Rodney 1 380
373 Bettyanne Rutter Rodney 1 383
375 Shane Armitage Rodney 1 387
387 Mary Thoreau Rodney 1 396
390 Vickie Mcmahon Rodney 1 402
394 Philip Thoreau Rodney 1 405
404 Lyn Nicholas Rodney 1 411
412 glenda hislop Rodney 1 419
414 margaret revell Rodney 1 423
426 Eric Williams Rodney 1 434
428 Paul Plester Rodney 1 437
432 suzanne wilkinson Rodney 1 441
435 Debra Kamphuis Rodney 1 444
438 Margaret Truscott Rodney 1 451
440 Jeffrey Walkington Rodney 1 454
447 Peter Hunt Rodney 1 459
456 Roger McKinlay Rodney 1 469
457 Darryl Studholme Rodney 1 472
466 Ian Draper Rodney 1 475
473 Lynn Ryder Rodney 1 480
474 Karen Schade Rodney 1 488
477 A Jay Rodney 1 493
487 Peter Clarke Rodney 1 497
488 Veronica Clarke Rodney 1 501
490 Sam Clarke Rodney 1 504
494 Liz Houghton‐brown Rodney 1 507
495 janine king Rodney 1 510
498 Heather Walton Rodney 1 513
501 Mark Douglas Rodney 1 516
502 Christabelle Rathe Rodney 1 524
504 roy hyslop Rodney 1 528
505 Margaret Matheson Rodney 1 531
509 Phil Pavis Rodney 1 534
511 Noel Luxford Rodney 1 538
512 Briton Smith Rodney 1 542
514 Jan Wells Rodney 1 544
518 Nicola Owen Rodney 1 547
#11
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Mike Weston
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011
Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: It appears more control is required and without powers of control/fines etc. there is no deterrent. Some areas definitely should not be allowed whereas others need to be clearly defined as suitable.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
1
#11
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Sounds sensible
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: If toilets are onboard then there are no excuses for bad behaviour and they should be able to park overnight in more areas than others without toilets.
Vehicles without toilets should be directed to sites that do have loos and this should be clearly displayed by vehicle service providers when bookings are made.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow more than 2 nights
Please tell us why: If most campers do not stay at one site for more than two nights then why do we need to restrict them to 2 nights???? Sounds like more unnecessary red tape to me!
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
2
#11
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 10am
Please tell us why: Enables more time for breakfast depending on availability to shops/cafes etc. and means they can linger a little longer if desired. Simply having a time should make campers aware of moving on and it can be enforced if abused. If 10am doesn't work down the track, then the bylaw is already in place and it should be a relatively minor adjustment to bring it forward to 9am if required.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
3
#12
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Chris Allan
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011
Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: • I disagree with losing the current protections against camping in our residential streets and outside our homes that our current legacy bylaws deliver.
• I understand that it is an advantage to add the ability to fine to support enforcement, however this is a small component in an otherwise unsatisfactory proposed bylaw.
• I cannot support the core components of the new freedom camping bylaw that places the majority of our Omaha Beach streets and roadside parking in the “not scheduled†areas.
• I disagree with NO general rules for camping in a vehicle in the “not scheduled†areas.
• Our homes and residential streets surround the heavily utilised public facilities at Omaha Beach. Parking at these facilities, for the only all tide boat ramp in the district and the popular beach reserves are, at times, over flowing. Currently the vehicles overflow from these areas directly onto roadside parking outside our homes. Under the proposed bylaw these roads will be “not scheduled†. This will allow unrestricted freedom camping in any vehicle, for an unlimited period, outside our homes. 24/7, with no ability to enforce. This is a totally unacceptable.
4
#12
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
• Once Omaha Beach reserves are advertised as freedom camping spots, we know from our day visitor volumes that the demand from freedom campers will also be extremely high. Our residential streets will be the first location that freedom campers will go when the proposed designated freedom camping car parks in the Omaha reserves are full.
• The immediate impact of no general rules in “not scheduled†areas is magnified by the popularity and high visitor numbers to Omaha Beach and would have a dramatic effect on the loss of privacy, amenity and access for Omaha Beach residents and visitors.
• Tauranga City’s freedom camping bylaw prohibits camping in front of a private residence or business, self contained vehicles only and a limit on nights. The “not scheduled†areas in Auckland should also have such provisions to protect basic amenity and access in highly utilised areas that are also residential areas like Omaha Beach.
• Camping is prohibited in the Omaha Beach reserves through the Reserves Act 1977, unless Auckland Council chooses to utilise a Ministerial Consent to overturn these protections.
• I believe that democracy should be applied and the current protections should only be overturned if the majority of the ratepayers of Omaha Beach agree to this change in status. If no such mandate is given, then these reserves should remain unchanged.
• In a recent survey, over 85% of Omaha residents stated they did not want freedom camping in our Omaha reserves. Auckland Council do not have this mandate from the people of Omaha Beach.
• Under the Reserves Act 1977 our Omaha Beach ‘’reserves are to be protected and preserved†.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping
• I strongly disagree with Auckland Council in overturning the camping prohibitions in Omaha Beach reserves.
5
#12
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
• I disagree with Auckland Council on their principal that spreading the problem will alleviate the problem. Spreading and promoting availability will encourage an overwhelming number of campers to popular Omaha Beach.
• The recognised ‘primary and secondary harms’ from freedom camping at the current 14 sites in Auckland will be greatly magnified due to Omaha Beach’s heavy visitor numbers, proximity to Auckland and unsuitability of the reserves in Omaha Beach to handle the camping requirements.
• There are already some ongoing issues with freedom campers in Omaha Beach – although Auckland Council may not be aware of these when selecting “restricted†sites for freedom camping.
• There are 10 camping grounds within 15 minutes’ drive of Omaha Beach, including on Omaha Flats Road and across the estuary at Whangateau. The area has designated freedom camping places within 10‐15 minutes drive and non designated spots well away from residential areas right across Rodney.
• The combination of advertised reserves for freedom camping and no general rules in the “not scheduled†areas will in fact deliver the opposite of restricting and managing freedom camping at Omaha Beach. It will result in creating primary and secondary harms from the designated reserves plus open up nearly all the streets and outside our homes to unlimited and unrestricted camping indefinitely.
• The reserves designated for freedom camping at Omaha Beach are unsuitable, and they do not meet the requirements set by Auckland Council for successful freedom camping, and nor do any of the three meet any of the criteria set by Auckland Council to mitigate the primary and secondary harms from freedom camping.
• The whole of Omaha Beach needs to receive a prohibited status.
• Restrictions in general – re number of vehicles, certified self‐contained only, and number of nights generally are a good idea, but without adequate enforcement they will fail.
• Council have already failed to adequately manage the enforcement in 14 sites across Auckland, and have publicity stated (in their meeting minutes) that no further resource will be allocated to this enforcement. While restrictions in theory are a good initiative, the ability to enforce is vital.
• The “not scheduled†areas must have general rules and I am suggesting ‐No camping in front a private residence or business, limit 2 nights and in a certified self‐contained van only
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
6
#12
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: • I disagree with this. All camping vehicles should be certified self‐contained, and this is for restricted freedom camping sites and also very importantly for “not scheduled†areas. Very few public toilets remain unlocked at night so access to toilets 24/7 is very hard to achieve and are not available at Omaha Beach.
• Self‐contained vehicles is the approach that has been adopted by other City Councils. Eg Tauranga City, whose bylaw has freedom camping only in certified self‐contained vehicles, restricted to a maximum 2 nights and not in front of a private residence or business.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: • I agree a maximum of two nights. This needs to include the “restricted areas†designated for camping and also the “not scheduled†areas.
• A restriction such as length of stay is meaningless unless it is actively enforced.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
7
#12
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, other
Please tell us why: • To be effective, an arrival time also needs to be in place to drive evening arrival.
• A restriction such as this is meaningless unless it is actively enforced.
• I cannot see freedom campers leaving Omaha Beach on a fine day. Many have bicycles, which they will use, and leave their van parked up.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Our concerns included:
‐ Use of the overflow boat trailer parking area on Omaha Drive – when there’s already a shortage of parking already
‐ Sites located close to, and surrounded by, residential properties
‐ Although a number of restrictions were proposed (the number of parking spaces were to be limited; restrictions on the types of vehicles permitted; and time restrictions etc) we saw an inability by Auckland Council to control this would lead to numerous breaches, and issues
‐ Lack of support facilities (toilets, rubbish bins etc)
In an effort to address the concerns we had, and reach a compromise position, which we hoped would be accepted by Council, we put forward an alternative proposal.
‐ 160 Omaha Drive (location of the secondary/overflow boat trailer parking). The area is heavily used throughout summer, and whilst it may not be heavily used outside of the daylight hours, it is highly unlikely freedom campers will vacate the sites during the daytime. The area is also surrounded by residential properties, who would be impacted. Although only 2 parks were proposed, we felt lack of enforcement would not prevent greater numbers, and also others using the area, and setting up camp. We recommended that prohibition was required to protect access to this area.
‐ Pukemateko Reserve, Omaha South. The area is surrounded by residential properties fronting onto the Reserve, who would be impacted. It’s also adjacent to a children’s playground, which is not ideal. Whilst the area may well not be heavily used outside of the daylight hours, again we felt it highly unlikely freedom campers would vacate the sites during the daytime. Although only 3 parks were proposed, we felt lack of enforcement would not prevent greater numbers, and also others using the area, and setting up camp – possibly on the Reserve itself. We recommended that prohibition was required to protect access to this area.
‐ William Fraser Reserve, 37 Broadlands Drive. We felt this was a more appropriate area to permit limited freedom camping sites ‐ if located in the lower area adjacent to the Reserve. However, we felt it needed to be only for certified self‐contained vehicles; and also with a restriction of night stays only (vacate site by 9am) – although the proposed restrictions will be of little use if not continually policed.
‐ 198 Mangatawhiri Road (Omaha South). This area was not considered by Council, and not proposed as a site. However, we considered this a more suitable site than some of the others, being a parking
8
#12
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
area surrounded by bush, with only one adjacent property, but protected by surrounding bush. We proposed this site be used instead, but with restrictions on numbers (say 4 max.); location; and length/time of stays.
Whilst we have proposed certain sites be prohibited from freedom camping, we have supported others (with restrictions), and the overall number of proposed sites remains similar to that being proposed by Council.
9
# 12
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Chris Allan
Site Name: William Fraser Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (non‐self‐contained permitted)
Site ID: 269 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
No response
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
No response
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No response
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Our concerns included:
‐ Use of the overflow boat trailer parking area on Omaha Drive whe nthere's already a shortage of parking already
‐ Sites located close to, and surrounded by, residential properties
10
# 12
‐ Although a number of restrictions were proposed (the number of parking spaces were to be limited; restrictions on the types of vehicles permitted; and time restrictions etc) we saw an inability by Auckland Council to control this would lead to numerous breaches, and issues
‐ Lack of support facilities (toilets, rubbish bins etc)
In an effort to address the concerns we had, and reach a compromise position, which we hoped would be accepted by Council, we put forward an alternative proposal.
‐ William Fraser Reserve, 37 Broadlands Drive. We felt this was a more appropriate area to permit limited freedom camping sites ‐ if located in the lower area adjacent to the Reserve. However, we felt it needed to be only for certified self‐contained vehicles; and also with a restriction of night stays only (vacate site by 9am) – although the proposed restrictions will be of little use if not continually policed.
Whilst we have proposed certain sites be prohibited from freedom camping, we have supported others (with restrictions), and the overall number of proposed sites remains similar to that being proposed by Council.
11
# 12
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Chris Allan
Site Name: Rita Way, Excelsior Way, Lagoon Way
Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 257 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Summer overload parking for boat trailers
Our concerns included:
‐ Use of the overflow boat trailer parking area on Omaha Drive whe nthere's already a shortage of parking already
12
# 12
‐ Sites located close to, and surrounded by, residential properties
‐ Although a number of restrictions were proposed (the number of parking spaces were to be limited; restrictions on the types of vehicles permitted; and time restrictions etc) we saw an inability by Auckland Council to control this would lead to numerous breaches, and issues
‐ Lack of support facilities (toilets, rubbish bins etc)
In an effort to address the concerns we had, and reach a compromise position, which we hoped would be accepted by Council, we put forward an alternative proposal.
‐ 160 Omaha Drive (location of the secondary/overflow boat trailer parking). The area is heavily used throughout summer, and whilst it may not be heavily used outside of the daylight hours, it is highly unlikely freedom campers will vacate the sites during the daytime. The area is also surrounded by residential properties, who would be impacted. Although only 2 parks were proposed, we felt lack of enforcement would not prevent greater numbers, and also others using the area, and setting up camp. We recommended that prohibition was required to protect access to this area.
13
# 12
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Chris Allan
Site Name: Pukemateko Reserve Omaha South Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 255 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No response
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
No response
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No response
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Our concerns included:
‐ Use of the overflow boat trailer parking area on Omaha Drive whe nthere's already a shortage of parking already
‐ Sites located close to, and surrounded by, residential properties
14
# 12
‐ Although a number of restrictions were proposed (the number of parking spaces were to be limited; restrictions on the types of vehicles permitted; and time restrictions etc) we saw an inability by Auckland Council to control this would lead to numerous breaches, and issues
‐ Lack of support facilities (toilets, rubbish bins etc)
In an effort to address the concerns we had, and reach a compromise position, which we hoped would be accepted by Council, we put forward an alternative proposal.
‐ Pukemateko Reserve, Omaha South. The area is surrounded by residential properties fronting onto the Reserve, who would be impacted. It’s also adjacent to a children’s playground, which is not ideal. Whilst the area may well not be heavily used outside of the daylight hours, again we felt it highly unlikely freedom campers would vacate the sites during the daytime. Although only 3 parks were proposed, we felt lack of enforcement would not prevent greater numbers, and also others using the area, and setting up camp – possibly on the Reserve itself. We recommended that prohibition was required to protect access to this area.Whilst we have proposed certain sites be prohibited from freedom camping, we have supported others (with restrictions), and the overall number of proposed sites remains similar to that being proposed by Council.
15
# 12
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Chris Allan
Site Name: Omaha Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 229 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
16
# 12
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Chris Allan
Site Name: Omaha Beach Boat Launching and Wharf
Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 228 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
see specific comments saved latter
17
#41
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Sean Thomas
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
18
#41
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow more than 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
19
#41
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
20
#43
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Nathania Widjanarko
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
21
#43
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
22
#43
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Without adequate facilities and way to enforce the rule, freedom camping will only distroy the environment
23
#56
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Darren Stevens
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Keep same provision, just add ability to give and issue fines.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
24
#56
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Only for certified Scc vehicles.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Only certified vehicles should be allow to camp. If people are given to choice then why would they even consider getting certified if their is a viable option out there not too ( you have to remember that in a lot of cases the lowest common denominator is at work where cheap travellers are concerned. At least ensuring that self containment is the minimum then if helps the environment)
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
25
#56
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 8am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Only allow freedom campers with SCC to camp, otherwise it makes mockery of having SCC regs. Anyone without facilities /SCC should use proper camp grounds ‐ thats why they have established themselves.
26
# 56
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Darren Stevens
Site Name: Matakana Wharf Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (non‐self‐contained permitted)
Site ID: 274 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
No, only allow certified self‐contained vehicles
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
1 ‐ 2
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 1 night per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, significant cultural or historic features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
The toilets are a fair distance (up steep hill) from the wharf, and therefore the likelihood of freedom campers without SCC making the trek to use them is limited ‐ best to limit to persons with facilities on there camper
27
#58
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Steve Reynolds
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
28
#58
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
29
#58
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
30
# 58
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Steve Reynolds
Site Name: Alexander Road Recreation Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 250 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
It’s to small a Carpark for big busses. It’s very small carpark, should be used for locals and boaters who have dingies ties up there
31
# 58
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Steve Reynolds
Site Name: Sunrise Boulevard (Snells Beach) Restriction Type:
Restricted area (non‐self‐contained permitted)
Site ID: 271 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
No, only allow certified self‐contained vehicles
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
3 ‐ 4
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 2 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Lots of kids here as it’s next to a playground. It’s a dangerous car park with large campervans reversing into car parks
32
# 58
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Steve Reynolds
Site Name: Sunburst Reserve and Tamatea Esplanade
Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 267 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
3 ‐ 4
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 2 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
It’s next to a kids playground. It’s dangerous having large camper busses reversing into parking spaces
33
# 58
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Steve Reynolds
Site Name: Whisper Cove Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 261 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Very small car park. Should be reserved for locals. No over night camping
34
#65
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Liz Sharek
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
35
#65
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Other
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
36
#65
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 8am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
37
# 65
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Liz Sharek
Site Name: Matakana Wharf Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (non‐self‐contained permitted)
Site ID: 274 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
No, only allow certified self‐contained vehicles
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
1 ‐ 2
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 1 night per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
38
#69
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Kerry Johnson
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: The new by law doesnt go far enough to control freedom camping and the miss use / abuse of the by law. There needs to be heavier fines and more control and tougher restrictions. There should be money spend on freedom camping areas ‐ eg better parking for the campers and more parking for the rest of us who do not live like this. There should also be a greater look into the different between freedom campers and those that live this way continually in the same spot.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
39
#69
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: We do not need more areas ‐ we need more designated camp sites ‐ keep them out of our public car parks, off of our beaches and off of our reserves. These areas are not designed for long term stays! There needs to be increased staff to monitor, fine and move on over‐stayers. design very strict rules with no exceptions ‐ council officers should be able to move people on as soon as possible.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Freedom campers should only be able to park anywhere at all if they have their own facilities ‐ if they do not have their own toilet etc in their vehicle then without exception they should be moved to a camp site. Our public toilets are not set up for people living in cars or trucks to use as a permanent bathroom. Anyone who pulls up to stay for longer than 1 night at any of our beaches, reserves or carparks must be fully self contained.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
40
#69
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Please tell us why: 2 nights MAX ‐ and for the record we have people camping at Hatfields beach for weeks and months on end ‐ the council do nothing! All areas should be restricted ‐ anyone trying to stay anywhere for longer than 2 nights must be moved on. We need clear signage in designated areas ‐ anyone camping out of those restricted areas MUST BE MOVED!
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 8am
Please tell us why: YES wholeheartedly ‐ they must move in the day time ‐ but if they are in designated areas or in a real campsite we wouldnt have this problem. They should be moved on from 8am in the morning and not allowed to return until 7. Give those of us that pay rates and taxes to use our facilities.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Hatfields Beach car park along the beach and the reserve is abused continually with people living there ‐ not just passing through for 1 or 2 nights ‐ we need clear laws and signage to prevent this with staff who will enforce it fully ‐ not pick and choose who they will and wont move on just because they know them. It is unacceptable. The increase in drug usage and rubbish dumping in the area is not acceptable and it needs to dealt with ‐ not left up to the locals to do beach clean ups to pick up used condoms and drug needles etc. We need strict rules that apply to all. Even better would to make them go into campsites ‐ stop wasting tax payers money.
41
# 69
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kerry Johnson
Site Name: Hatfields Beach Recreation Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 353 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
3 ‐ 4
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 2 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
This area is heavily used and abused by campers and heomeless people. The beach side of the carpark is alwasy full with homeless people, people sleeping in cars, trucks ‐ many arent proper campervans with full facilities on board. The are is often full of rubbish, drug apparatus ‐ needles, P bags and pipes. There is often little space for the public to park often these freedom campers will leave their trailer of boats and belongings for weeks on end, washing left hanging up, Its is a major issue at Hatfields. There needs to be clear signage of what is allowed ‐ where they can park so that the locals feel safe and so council staff can move people on. People hide their cars
42
# 69
and tents in the bushes at the back of the reserve ‐ another area where used condoms, and drug material is often found.Right now the area looks like a trailer park ‐ I am not looking forward to another summer of trailer park beaches.
Hatfields Beach car park along the beach and the reserve is abused continually with people living there ‐ not just passing through for 1 or 2 nights ‐ we need clear laws and signage to prevent this with staff who will enforce it fully ‐ not pick and choose who they will and wont move on just because they know them. It is unacceptable. The increase in drug usage and rubbish dumping in the area is not acceptable and it needs to dealt with ‐ not left up to the locals to do beach clean ups to pick up used condoms and drug needles etc. We need strict rules that apply to all. Even better would to make them go into campsites ‐ stop wasting tax payers money.
43
#83
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Fleur Coleman
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: It encourages responsible use of our environment. Leaving behind rubbish is not okay.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
44
#83
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: It isn't particularly fair if you are local and go to your local beach and cannot even get a park because it is crowded out with campervans etc. Can our environment sustain any sort of Freedom Camping ‐ we have camping grounds where proprietors are trying to earn a living, there's plenty of provision there. Unless in the case of being homeless, obviously then the people are citizens of NZ not just holidaymakers.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: If toilet facilities are not provided then this will lead to un‐hygienic practices that are harmful to the environment. I don't want to see our country turned into a tip.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: Unless homeless. Because they are already getting an extremely generous 'free ride' I'd much rather see them pay to stay and the money go back into funding DOC for example ‐ that would be their pay off for the environmental damage.
Proposal 5
45
#83
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, other
Please tell us why: I am unsure in places such as Snells Beach where there is high local traffic I would expect them to go before 9am, so that parents can park safely at the beach. In other more isolated areas 10am seems fine. But ideally I would like to see Freedom camping end.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
no
46
# 83
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Fleur Coleman
Site Name: Jamieson Bay Esplanade Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 216 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, significant cultural or historic features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
This area does not need the high traffic of Freedom Campers, the roads are not designed for this activity. I am most concerned with the environmental impact.
47
# 83
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Fleur Coleman
Site Name: Opahi Bay Beach Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 230 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, significant cultural or historic features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
keep it pristine keep the traffic out
48
#86
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Carol Abley
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
49
#86
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
50
#86
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 8am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Freedom camping should be policed, where there is a policy.
51
# 86
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Carol Abley
Site Name: Orewa Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 345 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
I object to freedom campers displaying their washing between the trees and taking up numerous car parking spaces as a result of their chairs tables and washing. There is a camp site close by they should use instead of taking car parking spaces from residents and then leaving the rubbishfor everyone to pick up
52
#94
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Gill Adshead
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Bylaws need teeth
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
53
#94
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Freedom camping must be regulated
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Non self contained freedom campers put huge pressure on facilities which in more remote areas are not cleaned frequently enough.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why: One night in a "freedom camp" seems fair especially if the area is very busy. Also means that vehicles are not in these areas all day but moving.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
54
#94
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why: Fair enough
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
I have serious issues with allowing freedom camping at all ‐ mostly around how it is going to be enforced and the cost. Currently landowners can provide a space for camping for a small fee. This should be encouraged then there is no overloaded toilet facilities and no rubbish and no freedom campers where they shouldn't be.
55
# 94
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Gill Adshead
Site Name: Mangakura Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (non‐self‐contained permitted)
Site ID: 275 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, significant cultural or historic features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Landowners in the area provide areas for campers to camp for a small fee. Freedom camping is inappropriate in areas where the toilet facilities are not checked and cleaned regularly
56
#144
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Julie Paul
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Without any penalty people will abuse the rules. It should be $200 per day similar to a nights paid accomodation.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
57
#144
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Why are the council intend on turning NZ into a free/ low cost destination at the rate payers expense? This at the same time the council do not have enough money to maintain rural roads or claim poverty when you complain about there shocking third world state???
The more you provide the worse the situation will be, go to the UK and the council charge tourist for using car parks in every spot and even for using public toilets they provide, does that stop tourist coming? NO, Auckland Council have gone mad.They are hitting Air BnB , and other paid accomodation providers with rates but at the same time except those rate payers to pay for free loaders. Madness
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Other
Please tell us why: All vechiles should be self contained, we know that others will not always stay at areas were there are toilets and foul our countryside.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
58
#144
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
There should be some charge for use, Auckland Council is stabbing there own accomodation providers in the back as well as there rate payers who having to pay to be crowded out of there own reserves and recreational areas each summer, just illogical.
59
#145
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Wendy Colville
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
60
#145
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Campers should be encouraged to use camp sites that have facilities. This means waste is managed properly, and equally, it contributes to a business model for tourism. It supports people running campgrounds instead of letting tourists freeload on our already stretched environment.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Wonderful if it works ‐ but in practise campers will ignore it on the slim chance they will ever be checked.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
61
#145
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why: Again, how will this be enforced? Answer: it will not. The council does not have enough resources.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
My area of interest specifically is Buckletons Beach (if designated a Freedom Camping Beach), Rodney. I wish to register concern that the campers will mean an increase in traffic onto a grass reserve that is currently the public area for kids to play on. This is a health and safety concern, and a risk to safety for children who come and go across the reserve to the beach.
62
# 145
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Wendy Colville
Site Name: Buckleton Beach Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 268 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No response
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
No response
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No response
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
My area of interest specifically is Buckletons Beach (if designated a Freedom Camping Beach), Rodney. I wish to register concern that the campers will mean an increase in traffic onto a grass reserve that is currently the public area for kids to play on. This is a health and safety concern, and a risk to safety for children who come and go across the reserve to the beach.
63
#147
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Leanne Vincent
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Should be more than $200. Cost to environment and enforcement costs will be higher than revenue gathered. Understand people wont have $200 but they need to have higher consequences
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
64
#147
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Are these people enhancing our country and city? Increasing the quantity wont enhance it. Limiting it means that we ensure it is pristine and green
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: need to provide facilities as human nature is such that there will be a minority that wont tidy up themselves so need to cater for this
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: I think this is a fair time to stay in one area to see what the area can provide and means everyone has an opportunity to experience all the sites
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
65
#147
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why: Depends on where these areas are. 9am is fair so they can free up the area for others
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
66
#149
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Considine Susanne
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
67
#149
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
68
#149
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Basically people should be held responsible for miss use of public amenities. Freedom camping needs to be contained, so everyone enjoys nz
69
#155
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Stuart Caulfield
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: You dont currently police noise what makes you think that you will enforce these ideas
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
70
#155
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Again , tell us how you will police breaking of these rules
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Other
Please tell us why: If vans have a toilet,the rental agencies charge for using it,so the campers do not use there toilet . All self contained vans should charge wether the toilet is used or not.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
71
#155
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 10am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
If you are within 5 km of a camp ground/holiday park then you should not be able to freedom camp.
If there are less than 7 car park spaces again no freedom camping.
72
# 155
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Stuart Caulfield
Site Name: Rainbows End Reserve ‐ Rodney Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 256 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No response
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
No response
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Bottom of a hill, noise travels up it naturally.
No toilet
Why is this not a prohibited area
73
# 155
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Stuart Caulfield
Site Name: Warkworth Showgrounds Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 245 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
74
#163
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Paul Allen
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Fines should be issued for those who flout the rules, especially for non‐self contained vehicles. Often seem to be staying in the library park in Wellsford.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
75
#163
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: There are some places where freedom camping is allowed which are not on your map ! ie Atiu Park. Self contained vehicles should be allowed to stay at a lot more places.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: see above. If self contained they are not impacting negatively on our environment
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow more than 2 nights
Please tell us why: Some may have special reasons for longer stays, so why not ?? eg surfers, fishermen, boaties
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
76
#163
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 10am
Please tell us why: Be reasonable, they are on holiday
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
77
#165
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Maleko Resident
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: I don't know my local board
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
78
#165
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: The definition of self containment is a JOKE. You are taking the wrong direction here. Please sort that before defining where they can park.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow more than 2 nights
Please tell us why: a 3‐4 night max is OK. Its about obeying the rules, not creating a nuisance, eg fires, rubbish and toileting where there's no toilet that's important not # nights.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
79
#165
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 10am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Sort the fines and behavior of the minority of campers: eg rubbish, toileting in public spaces and being responsible for their vehicles. eg fines, RUC and WOF. Its a Joke NZ.
Clamp any offenders.
80
# 165
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Maleko Resident
Site Name: Sunrise Boulevard (Snells Beach) Restriction Type:
Restricted area (non‐self‐contained permitted)
Site ID: 271 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
No response
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
No response
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
your map is wrong. The camping spaces are at the Northern end of the car park
81
# 165
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Maleko Resident
Site Name: Highfield Garden and The Glade Reserve
Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 213 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Its locked at night so that solves the potential problem
82
# 165
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Maleko Resident
Site Name: Whisper Cove Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 261 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
3 ‐ 4
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
83
# 165
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Maleko Resident
Site Name: Brick Bay Drive ‐ Puriri Place Reserve
Restriction Type:
Restricted area (non‐self‐contained permitted)
Site ID: 277 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
No, only allow certified self‐contained vehicles
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
3 ‐ 4
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
84
#173
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Evelyn Wright
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Other
Please tell us why: It depends on the areas the Council decides on..
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
85
#173
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: There are more people in larger motorhomes, caravan and 5th wheelers. The size of the spaces need to be reviewed as well as the number. Some regions are proposing areas that are not suitable and also miminising the areas available wchihc will just put pressure/overcrowding on other areas.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: I think it is important to protect out environment. I believe certain areas have a knee jerk reaction to banning vehicles from certain areas. they don't allow any vehicles and yet should be targeting those who are staying for a long time or are not self contained.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow more than 2 nights
Please tell us why: Two night is not very long. And there are a number of people who are 'living permanently in their vehicles. This is actually becoming a lifestyle due to the rising cost of living for people to be able to manage to survive.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
86
#173
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, other
Please tell us why: This then mean it is only an overnight stay. This could be put in place in some areas but actually I think it would be better to pick areas that do no have a high day time use. I also think if this in agreed upon it should be 10am (like a motel).
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
87
Points to consider:
Thank you for allowing the opportunity have our say. This may be a bit of a jumble but hopefully it will be a little food for thought and be a little helpful from one ‘on the road’.
There are more and more people in motorhomes. There are also a number of larger vehicles on the road and they cannot use some of the designated areas because they are too small for manoeuvring and parking.
I think it would be a good idea to have special areas for camping with minimal fees, as the MCA does to pay for facilities. What about minimal fees for water and dump stations and toilets?
Change the name of Freedom Camping – so as not to emphasise ‘Free’
It is really important to disperse the freedom camping so there is not overcrowding in areas
I believe freedom campers may be blamed for litter but in fact it is often late night cars with takeaways who fill the bins and leave their litter in car parks. Where ever I go I pick up rubbish in the area.
It seems some areas are banned as a knee jerk reaction as a result of complaints. Most of those ‘on the road’ are responsible so rather than target everyone and ban an area focus on enforcement – moving those on where there are no facilities and they are not self-contained, and shifting thoseon who have stay a long time.
There are a greater proportion of people living in motorhomes as a way of living and also because of the cost of living in areas such as Auckland. I know of a number of people that this is a way they can manage due to financial challenges.
Those who are living this way often have stories/reasons for this as a permanent lifestyle:
• I know of a couple who were at retirement age who lost practically all their money due to aleaky home. They bought a motorhome to live and still work as well.
• For me this is a permanent living arrangement due to past health issues and needing tochange careers. I am putting myself through College as well as working part-time (can’twork full-time as I need time to study). I have had to sell my property due to financialchallenges. I lived in rented accommodation but if rooms were empty more rent needed tobe paid. There was difficulty in finding suitable flatmates – some who said they didn’t takedrugs only to find they took ‘P’ and became abusive. I have an elderly dog and thereforecannot park in motor camps, regional parks and DOC sites.
• A couple who are trying to make ends meet on one income and look after three children.Orthodontic bills turn up. Rents are so expensive. To buy a home you need to be able tosave for it while paying rent
Where I am it seems the council do not take a graduated approach and do not take into consideration individual circumstances. They do not consider that what is now being since is perhaps ‘homeless’ but not actually living on the street (more like on the road).
#173
88
People do not seem to be aware that having motorhomes, caravans, buses and 5th wheelers freedom camping provide security in the area.
#173
89
# 173
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Evelyn Wright
Site Name: Stanmore Bay Park Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 354 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No restriction
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
This is a nice spacious area for all sized vehicles. Under the trees as an allocated area is not suitable as many motorhomes, 5th wheelers, buses and caravans rely on sunshine for power.
90
# 173
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Evelyn Wright
Site Name: Victor Eaves Park Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 355 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No restriction
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
It is a nice spacious area and is away from most residential houses. The area is also used by those with their takeaways and they tend to leave these in overflowing bins or on the carpark.
There are only toilets in one area of the park so that could be for all freedom camping an areas allocated also to only self‐contained
# 173
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Evelyn Wright
Site Name: Hatfields Beach Recreation Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 353 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
7 ‐ 8
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No restriction
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
This has limited facilities and is used by beach goers so self containment is important. There is also an area of parking that is used as the space is quite small for some motorhomes, 5th wheelers, buses and caravans.
92
# 173
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Evelyn Wright
Site Name: Gulf Harbour Marina Hammerhead Reserve
Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 352 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No restriction
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
some larger vehicles should be allowed to park outside of the current designated area so as not to take up too many parks in the designated area
93
# 173
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Evelyn Wright
Site Name: Metro Park East Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 348 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
I would like to emphasize the importance of more places rather than less to distribute the motorhomes, 5th wheelers, buses and caravans
94
# 173
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Evelyn Wright
Site Name: Arundel Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 347 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
This was an area for self contained vehicles in the past and can help spread the areas where motorhomes. There should be a size limit on the vehicles that can park here
95
#181
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Stuart Windross
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
96
#181
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
97
#181
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Our experience in France Italy and Germany shows that the establishment of such areas for overnighting can be very positive. However good oversight and enforcement is the key to ensure that rules are followed. The ultimate sanction for repeated abuse of facilities and rules should be vehicle impounding as in traffic offences.
Another key element to success in Europe is ensuring that the spaces are in full view (not concealed amongst trees etc.) which helps to minimise overstaying, illegal dumping/toileting, and inappropriate behaviour. The regular maintenance of facilities and emptying of bins etc similarly sets the tone.
98
#182
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Tim Scholes
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: We have to limit the areas, but rate payers who provide the funding, should be able to use the areas, I use Orewa reserve a lot and many mornings the rubbish, food scraps in not pleasant, 20 ‐30 are using most weekends and some have been in the car part for months moving cars out during the day. Yes have a fine but enforce it rigidly and not with warnings.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
99
#182
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Enforce and limit, if free campers want to be close to beachs & CBD thay can pay like most people.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Most the issues are with free campers not self contained , At orewa they all wait till the clear goes through in the morning and it is disgust mess within a hour, eg food scraps in basins and other rubbish
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: But can be parked continually like it is happening in Orewa where no one can get the parks closes to beach due to campers
Proposal 5
100
#182
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 8am
Please tell us why: Most are beach areas, and people go before it get to hot, if it free onther rules not like hotels apply
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
The enforcement of the bylaw ‐ no warnings as most are transient will abuse and move on, interesting that most from tourist from europe ‐ could not free camp like this in their home countries, why to the expect to here
101
# 182
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Tim Scholes
Site Name: Kinloch Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 350 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
102
# 182
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Tim Scholes
Site Name: Grant Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 331 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
This is in the middle of a urban area with lots of old people who may be put at risk
103
# 182
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Tim Scholes
Site Name: Red Beach Waterfront Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 336 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
very limited parking and campers in summer take half
104
# 182
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Tim Scholes
Site Name: Remembrance Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 337 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Limited parking and regularly we have 2‐3 campers so no parking
105
# 182
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Tim Scholes
Site Name: Western Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 341 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
106
# 182
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Tim Scholes
Site Name: Orewa Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 345 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, significant cultural or historic features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
If you want beach front go next door to camp ground
107
# 182
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Tim Scholes
Site Name: Metro Park East Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 348 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
108
# 182
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Tim Scholes
Site Name: Victor Eaves Park Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 355 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
5 ‐ 6
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 2 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
109
# 182
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Tim Scholes
Site Name: Arundel Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 347 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
you can't get a park in evenings and most are not contained, lots of tents, lot of rubbish left and toilets are off limits
110
#185
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Eric van Essen
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
111
#185
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: It can be an economic, enjoyable and relatively safe way to tour that should be catered for but without adverse effect on environment and sanitation.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: To discourage irresponsible behaviour, poor sanitation and consideration for others experience.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: Objective is to provide opportunity to visit and enjoy in a fair and equitable manner.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
112
#185
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why: Otherwise parking restrictions applicable to those areas would apply to these vehicles.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
113
#190
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Peter Simunovich
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
114
#190
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Should be completely banned.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
115
#190
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 8am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
116
# 190
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Peter Simunovich
Site Name: Kinloch Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 350 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
117
# 190
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Peter Simunovich
Site Name: Orewa North Lookout Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 335 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
118
# 190
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Peter Simunovich
Site Name: Remembrance Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 337 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
119
# 190
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Peter Simunovich
Site Name: Western Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 341 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
120
# 190
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Peter Simunovich
Site Name: Arundel Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 347 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, significant cultural or historic features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
121
# 190
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Peter Simunovich
Site Name: Orewa Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 345 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, significant cultural or historic features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
122
#192
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Tony Lovelidge
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
123
#192
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
124
#192
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Many towns in nz are now camper friendly. Auckland struggles, mainly because of lack of space. Tourism is big bucks, and many cash spending tourists hire vans. More should be done to encourage these into nzs main city. Schemes such as out of town parking then cheap bus ride into town.
125
#198
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Laura Gardner
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: There is no point having a law if it is not enforced/there is no consequence in breaking it. If the campers stay in the designated areas it is also easier to manage their waste and to provide facilities for them.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
126
#198
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: This sounds like a great plan.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: These campers leaving their business in inappropriate places is not ok, its disgusting, so hopefully this would minimize it from occurring.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow more than 2 nights
Please tell us why: Its supposed to be freedom camping, it kind of ruins it if they are forced to move on after a night or 2 if there are more things in that area they wanted to do or they loved it and wanted to stay a while longer. I agree they can't start living there, but perhaps the maximum should be a week?
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
127
#198
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, other
Please tell us why: To avoid this issue why not have permanent spots designated for campers only or parking only? Why force someone on holiday time to have to pack up and move on at certain times, they should be able to camp in peace.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
128
#203
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Paul Heiplik
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Good that there is some enforcement. However, I don't know how successful it will be.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
129
#203
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Proposal to make urban areas in Omaha available for freedom camping is ludicrous. Using car parks next to playgrounds where there is no showers/toilets and rubbish facilities and local children playing is a recipe for trouble.
Suggesting that campers will be rushed away if they stay for more than a couple of days is ludicrous, how many officers are going to around to do that.
We have a car park near us in Omaha and there has been a camper van and their car parked there for weeks. They go away and then come back to live.
Freedom camping in an urban area is going to be a problem. We see that around New Zealand now with freedom campers being bad visitors. Enco
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Theoretically fine, but how will you enforce that. How many officers do you have to make sure everyone is using their toilets and are certified.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
130
#203
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why: How many staff have you got to police this? People will stay as long as they want and unless you have staff visiting all the sites everyday and writing down license plates numbers and enforcing this, it won't happen.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, other
Please tell us why: "suggests leaving by 9am", once again how is this possibly practical.
Unless an officer chases them out (he will be pretty busy), I can't see any of these rules really making a difference.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
131
# 203
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Paul Heiplik
Site Name: Pukemateko Reserve Omaha South Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 255 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
This is a play ground area used by locals and day visitors.
132
# 203
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Paul Heiplik
Site Name: Rita Way, Excelsior Way, Lagoon Way
Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 257 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
This is used as a overflow area for cars with trailers. Not suitable for camping.
This car park is used all summer.
133
#205
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Chris Walton
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Needs to be a way to fine people who abuse the lovely country we have.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
134
#205
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: This needs to be done very carefully so as not to interfere with New Zealanders way of life in their own homes.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: I strongly agree to this one, and it needs to be policed and people fined. I have come across human faeces and toilet paper on the beach and in parks and it needs to be prevented.
The fines should be instant,or passports confiscated, otherwise tourists will leave the country with unpaid fines and be laughing at us.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: As some people live full time in their motorhomes, it is necessary to have a rule like this so we all get a turn at these lovely spots.
Proposal 5
135
#205
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 10am
Please tell us why: 9am is way too early, it doesn't leave time for a walk on the beach or breakfast at a cafe. I assume this relates to beaches etc where NZers come for the day, unlikely for many people to come before 10, so think that is a reasonable time.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
I have mentioned this but I think the rules need to be policed regularly, and the fines instant or passports confiscated, or immigration notified and fines collected at airport on leaving the country. Otherwise it is all a waste of time and tourists will leave the country laughing at us and flouting our laws. We have a self contained motorhome, and love freedom camping but are upset by people toileting on beaches and in the bush. On occasion this has been even though there are public toilets nearby.... so this needs to be covered too. More Cameras!
136
# 205
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Chris Walton
Site Name: Gulf Harbour Recreation Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 332 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow all vehicles to camp in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
This seems to be used as a sports area for children, also there is a lovely playground there. Freedom camping would be ok just in the small parking area, but gone by 10am so the locals can use the playground and sports area.
137
# 205
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Chris Walton
Site Name: Fishermans Rock Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 330 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
138
#208
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Jonathan Parminter
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: This will encourage compliance
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
139
#208
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: We need more places. But want to make sure that these facilities are not abused and become either permanent campsites and also to ensure that more campers can use places.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Campers are not likely to unpack a toilet. Self contained must mean a full‐time toilet facility.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow more than 2 nights
Please tell us why: In rural areas, 4 nights should be acceptable.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
140
#208
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, other
Please tell us why: If the freedom camping zone is only a portion of the available parking then, so long as the vehicles are only occupying a single parking space, they should be able to enjoy the location for the entire day should they choose. Freedom camping is not just about being somewhere overnight. Many of the sites have nearby walks or cycling trails. Freedom campers should be able to enjoy these as much as any other day tripper. On last day, should leave by 10am Most day users do not arrive before 10am. Most cafes are not open before 9am.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
freedom campers are tourists that want to enjoy the locations as much as locals and other visitors. If the campers stayed in an official campsite and then visited popular locations, it would still affect the availability of parking for other day trippers. So they should be able to stay in designated areas only a night, a day, another night and then leave by 10 am the next day.
141
# 208
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Jonathan Parminter
Site Name: Metro Park East Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 348 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
As this is a sports ground will allow possibility of spectators/players for tournaments. Allows visitors to area to enjoy cycleway.
142
#219
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Warren May
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
143
#219
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
144
#219
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
145
# 219
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Warren May
Site Name: Onewa Domain Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 371 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Kaipātiki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
146
#221
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Dave Shanks
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
147
#221
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
148
#221
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
149
# 221
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Dave Shanks
Site Name: Orewa Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 345 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
150
#222
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: ROY LITTLE
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
151
#222
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
152
#222
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Orewa ‐ High general public use of most of the areas attractive to freedom campers, this is not a good mix.
153
# 222
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
ROY LITTLE
Site Name: Orewa Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 345 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
General public use is very high, this does not mix with freedom camping
154
#223
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Bronwyn Wilde
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: There are ample holidays parks that are easily located by a simple google search. As with any travel undertaken there is cost involved. Either contribute to the community you are visiting by staying in a paid‐for, fit‐for‐purpose setting or be prepared to be fined.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
155
#223
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Other
Please tell us why: New Zealand is a tourist destination. There is no need for freedom camping. Freedom campers are happy to pay for a vehicle, petrol, insurances (sometimes) and daily food necessities. They should be staying and paying for fit‐for‐purpose settings.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Other
Please tell us why: There is no need for freedom campers to access public toilets if they are in paid‐for, fit‐for‐purpose settings. These people need to be contributing to the communities they are visiting.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why: As above.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
156
#223
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, other
Please tell us why: Even by 0900 children can still see discarded alcohol cans and bottles, cigarette butts, adults in various states of undress and questionable sobriety. Public areas are exactly that ‐ public. Behaviours that require sleep, ablution and food preparation are activities that should take place within a residential setting or fit‐for‐purpose setting.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
157
# 223
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Bronwyn Wilde
Site Name: Orewa Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 345 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Freedom camping should not be allowed in Orewa. We have a fabulous camping ground that should be utilised. These people should be supporting our community when they are visiting Orewa.
158
#224
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Harry Wenman
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Because there a pain on the ass
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
159
#224
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Make them stay on camp grounds to help support those local business
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
160
#224
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, other
Please tell us why: Make it at least 6am. Beaches are busy places in summer even at early times like 6
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
161
#225
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Simon van Rossum
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: there needs to be a mechanism to manage / fine campers who misuse facilities or obstruct Auckland residents from accessing public parks and beaches
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
162
#225
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: We do not need more freedom camping areas in the city. There are plenty of campsites around Auckland which are set up to accommodate campers
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Freedom camping should always be in self contained vehicles and should not rely on public toilet facilities. Note ‐ freedom camping is a different issue to car dwellers
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: include a limit on number of nights per month
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
163
#225
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 8am
Please tell us why: and not arrive before 8pm
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Freedom camping is not well suited to cities, it is a great way to travel the remote areas of NZ with the freedom to stop and sleep where needed. When in cities travellers should use the facilities available (backpackers, motels, campsites...). Not using these facilities is effectively bludging off the residents of Auckland who pay to maintain the public facilities.
Homeless people living in cars is a different issue, and should not be confused with the freedom camping bylaws.
164
# 225
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Simon van Rossum
Site Name: Arundel Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 347 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
there is a lot of dangerous drug / drinking rubbish left by freedom campers and car dwellers, and the public toilets are over used. the carpark is small and in high demand by locals and people from wider Auckland area, particularly over summer. There is a
165
# 225
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Simon van Rossum
Site Name: Orewa Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 345 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
this is a busy site for locals and people coming to the beach from wider Auckland. Freedom campers and car dwellers dominate carparking and leave dangerous rubbish behind
there is a perfectly good campsite right next to this carpark.
166
#227
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Renee Beckett
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
167
#227
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
168
#227
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
169
# 227
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Renee Beckett
Site Name: Arundel Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 347 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No response
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
The freedom campers regularly leave the tables with rubbish, food scraps, they stay for extended length and generally one feels unsafe in the area when multiple campers are parked all along the site.
170
# 227
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Renee Beckett
Site Name: Orewa Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 345 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Campers ar parking across two and there spaces, stay there several days, move to either end of car ark to avoid detection, leave rubbish
171
#233
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Martin Halliday
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
172
#233
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
173
#233
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
I fundamentally disagree with freedom camping as a significant number of freedom campers are causing environmental and social impacts which are negatively affecting the populations enjoyment of public spaces. Creating areas for people to camp cost the country money and are funded by tax payers which I don’t believe is right. If freedom camping could be cost neutral for the country and environmentally neutral I would support more areas being made available.
174
# 233
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Martin Halliday
Site Name: Metro Park East Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 348 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
175
# 233
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Martin Halliday
Site Name: Victor Eaves Park Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 355 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
1 ‐ 2
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 2 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
176
# 233
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Martin Halliday
Site Name: Western Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 341 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
177
# 233
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Martin Halliday
Site Name: Kinloch Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 350 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
178
# 233
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Martin Halliday
Site Name: Remembrance Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 337 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
179
# 233
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Martin Halliday
Site Name: Orewa Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 345 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
180
#235
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Andrew Walker
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Pay your way, like any other traveler.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
181
#235
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Orewa has a camp ground about 200m South of the domain. They should book and stay in the ground, invest in the community.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Is that not what freedom camping is about.?
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: Enjoy the local area.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
182
#235
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why: Fair trade for free accommodation.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
183
#236
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Malcolm Wallace
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Other
Please tell us why: 1. I have no problem with approved Self contained vehicles (such as motor homes)in a designated area between 5pm and 9 am the following day.
2. Tents and cars NO.
3. Rough sleeping NO
4. I agree with fines enforcement officer issuing instant fines.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research
184
#236
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: On the proviso that:
1. A nominal fee be charged to cover:
2. Bins being emptied by council
3. Use and maintenance of of flush toilet and cold showers on site
4. Sites are vacated by 9am so locals aren't unfairly inconvenienced.
5. Fines enforcement.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Enviromentally friendly but must move on by 9am
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
185
#236
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: If people want to stay in the area longer, they should use the local camp for at least one night
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why: Locals should not be inconvenienced
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
All appropriate designated areas should have a rubbish bin within their confines
186
#239
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: stu handford
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
187
#239
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
188
#239
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 8am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
189
# 239
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
stu handford
Site Name: Orewa Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 345 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
190
#248
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Cameron Pearson
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Its a by law you should be able to enforce it by issuing penalties
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
191
#248
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: If there are more available "legal" spots people will more incline to stay there especially if the facilities are all available at these sites
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: I feel that this wont deter people from staying on these sites
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: if there are enough locations to stay in they will be able to move around and I feel like 2 nights is sufficient to stay in once space when freedom camping
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
192
#248
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why: This could case more trouble than it is worth, especially with locals feeling like they are taking away their public spaces that they help pay for to maintain
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
193
#250
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Stephanie Cave
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
194
#250
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
195
#250
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
I am against having Freedom campers using Arundel Reserve to live. My son goes to Sea Scouts there and the area is not built for this type of use. They leave tons of garbage, hang their washing all over the place, and take up all the parking.
196
# 250
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Stephanie Cave
Site Name: Arundel Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 347 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No response
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
I am against having Freedom campers using Arundel Reserve to live. My son goes to Sea Scouts there and the area is not built for this type of use. They leave tons of garbage, hang their washing all over the place, and take up all the parking.
197
#254
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Yvonne Carleton
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: I live in Orewa and currently freedom campers make a mess of the arundel reserve placing towels to dry on our native tress breaking them. They leave an atrocious mess and overload the local toilets etc by not having self contained units they should be using ‐ that is one of the stipulations that should be considered.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
198
#254
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Freedom camping can not be adequately policed and leads to local areas being harmed. There are camps and DOC camps. If there is freedom camping it should be fully self contained and no outside visibility or disruption to others ie no cooking outside their vehicles. Fully self contained grey water etc. Use of public toilets and showers by freedom campers should be banned.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Freedom camping can not be adequately policed and leads to local areas being harmed. There are camps and DOC camps. If there is freedom camping it should be fully self contained and no outside visibility or disruption to others ie no cooking outside their vehicles. Fully self contained grey water etc. Use of public toilets and showers by freedom campers should be banned. At arundel reserve the freedom campers leave a pig sty they use the car park as a rubbish dump and the locals have to clean up after wards they use the facilities as well leaving disgusting mess. They cook beside their vehicles causing access problems to the already limited car park and cause undue disruption to others. Freedom camping should be only for those with self contained unit and therefore away from public toilets thus not impinging on the public use of carparks and facilities. My experience freedom campers tend to have total disregard for others leaving rubbish everywhere for locals to clean up. It is sad but this is how Arundel reserve in particular has been used in the past 8 years I have been in Orewa and noticed the horrendous mess locals must clean up. I have been obstructed from parking by campers who thinks it their right to take up two parks one for the camper the other for their chairs and cooking facility.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
199
#254
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why: The longer they stay the more disruption to the public. They should have to vacate the area daily by 9 am like any other camping ground. Then "checkin" no earlier than maybe 5pm so least disruption to the public.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why: First proposal that makes sense apart from the fines. Freedom campers take advantage as its free they think it has no value instead of thinking this is an awesome gift lets leave it better than we found it they abuse the system that allows this to happen.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Arundel reserve ‐ would not let me save this comment. This applies to freedom camping in general I have watched and been part of the locals who must pick up glass rubbish and other garbage left behind by freedom campers . I have been obstructed from parking by freedom campers who take 2 car parks so they cook their dinner in the "spare park" they have taken up. I have not been able to find parks I have watched trees being used as drying racks. I have witnessed drunks around my children as the freedom campers settle in for the evening and don't drive so get drunk there. I have witnessed the disgusting state of the area of the toilets etc especially if they cant get into them. I have also witnessed the majority of thee vehicles are not self contained and so rely on public facilities to wash themselves and toilets. It is unfortunate that rather than freedom they equate it to free and therefore valueless if they cared for the area did not disrupt other were courteous, considerate and sober I may have a different opinion however my 8 years of being in this area visiting this site most days has reinforced my opinion that freedom camping is abused in NZ. Please put a stop to it especially in areas frequented by families.
200
# 254
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Yvonne Carleton
Site Name: Arundel Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 347 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Arundel reserve ‐ would not let me save this comment. This applies to freedom camping in general I have watched and been part of the locals who must pick up glass rubbish and other garbage left behind by freedom campers . I have been obstructed from parking by freedom campers who take 2 car parks so they cook their dinner in the "spare park" they have taken up. I have not been able to find parks I have watched trees being used as drying racks. I have witnessed drunks around my children as the freedom campers settle in for the evening and don't drive so get drunk there. I have witnessed the disgusting state of the area of the toilets etc especially if they
201
# 254
cant get into them. I have also witnessed the majority of thee vehicles are not self contained and so rely on public facilities to wash themselves and toilets. It is unfortunate that rather than freedom they equate it to free and therefore valueless if they cared for the area did not disrupt other were courteous, considerate and sober I may have a different opinion however my 8 years of being in this area visiting this site most days has reinforced my opinion that freedom camping is abused in NZ. Please put a stop to it especially in areas frequented by families.
202
#264
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Mark Ostermeyer
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Experience has taught us freedom campers show little or no respect for the environment, community or bylaws. Couple this with their nomadic life style and you stand no chance of ever collecting any fines, even if an enforcement officer ever issues them.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
203
#264
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Make freedom camping illegal. Auckland has well serviced camp grounds, and more would be encouraged into that line of business if the law supported them.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Any person who can afford such a vehicle can well afford camp ground fees. which is the usual excuse for not using camp grounds.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why: allow no nights. plan their journey and stay in camp grounds.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
204
#264
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, other
Please tell us why: Stay in camp grounds and use public places and facilities the same as any other citizen does.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
205
# 264
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Mark Ostermeyer
Site Name: Arundel Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 347 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Freedom campers are a pest in this reserve during the summer, and complaints to enforcement brings no relief. Scouts hall occupants are frequently inconvenienced by freedom campers and for security reasons have to restrict activities. Adults supervising these activities have been abused & intimidated by freedom campers, who not infrequently are suffering from over indulgence with alcohol. And all this in a prohibited area ?
206
#268
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Mary Logan
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Allow alot more freedom camping so that this is not constricted into a few places.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
207
#268
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: The council owns alot of land that is hardly used. Let visitors go to more reserves etc
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Where there are no public toilets then the vehicles camping should be self contained. Makes perfect sense
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow more than 2 nights
Please tell us why: make it 4 nights. most campers will move on in less time but if there is a need for a couple more nights what is the harm?
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
208
#268
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, other
Please tell us why: Let various exit times and in some cases in out of the way spots allow campers to stay all day and enjoy the area
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
209
#274
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Suzanne Service
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
210
#274
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
211
#274
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Freedom camping on Marheson Bay reserve has been a total disaster. The toilet block is an unsanitary mess, the septic tank needs frequent pumping out, and is inadequate for the load.
Campers stay as long as they like. Most do not have self contained facilities.
When the ground is too wet, they park in the public beach parking places, including the turning circle, which is supposed to be no parking.
They build fires on the beach and leave broken glass in the sand.
The rubbish bins overflow every day.
212
# 274
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Suzanne Service
Site Name: Matheson Bay Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 263 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No response
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
No response
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No response
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Freedom camping on Matheson Bay reserve has been a total disaster. The toilet block is an unsanitary mess, the septic tank needs frequent pumping out, and is inadequate for the load. Campers stay as long as they like. Most do not have self contained facilities. When the ground is too wet, they park in the public beach parking places, including the turning circle, which is supposed to be no parking. They build fires on the beach and leave broken glass in the sand. The rubbish bins overflow every day.
213
#283
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Eleanor Wenman
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
214
#283
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: We do NOT want freedom campers at Orewa Beach!
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why: We do NOT want freedom campers to stay at all at Orewa Beach. This proposal could see freedom campers bunny hopping between different car parks.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
215
#283
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 8am
Please tell us why: It is ok for those people who are genuinely touring NZ on holiday, but what annoys Orewa Surf Club are the people who live in their camping vehicles at Orewa Beach Surf club all the time for free, blocking car park spaces, doing laundry, washing dishes etc in public toilets. Some of them have been seen filming kids on the beach. That is NOT ok. Make an area at Hatfields that they can go to.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
216
# 283
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Eleanor Wenman
Site Name: Orewa Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 345 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Orewa Beach is used every day for the Surf Club. These fit and healthy kids do not want to have to walk by people smoking, cleaning their pots and pans and hanging around the Surf Club.
217
#285
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Kate Dunn
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: There are many people who "freedom camp" in SC vehicles, who do not make a mess, or cause any trouble, and who move on after a day or two. The trouble is actually that the council only hears from those who have a bee in their bonnet about it. People who are happy with it or don't actually mind, don't call the council! It's only the ones who complain that do, so they are the only ones the council hears, so the council thinks everyone feels the same. And the squeaky wheel gets the oil. Too bad for those who disagree.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
218
#285
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Other
Please tell us why: I agree with providing more places, to spread the load, but many of the "proposed sites" are already being used, but will now be restricted further in space and time. This won't help anyone. It will actually just make it worse. The issue is not going to go away, but will, in fact continue to grow, as stats from the last five years have shown. AND most of the places that are available have NO room for larger vehicles like buses or long motorhomes. What there actually needs to be is more sites, with more spaces, and more large vehicle spaces.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: This one makes perfect sense.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow more than 2 nights
Please tell us why: Maybe 2 nights at a time, yes. But limiting it to one or two nights a month will actually make it worse. Those that stay in a place one night a week, or three nights a month, or the like, will have fewer places to
219
#285
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
stay than they do now. There are those who live in their vehicles very responsibly, and they need more places and more nights, not less.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, other
Please tell us why: I agree in some ways, because this would solve the problem of areas being too clogged during the day. But then, what if people are not staying overnight, just parking there while they go to the cafe or shops? How is their vehicle different from any other vehicle?
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
I'm not sure of the exact address, but the big new park that is going to be developed on Green Road in Dairy Flat should have a large freedom camping area for self contained vehicles. Tourism is rapidly growing, and not all tourists want to spend their money on accommodation, but would rather spend it on experiencing our country, so instead of trying to make that harder, find a way to cater to it. Also, there are many who are now choosing to live in their motorhomes, even while they work in Auckland, because of exhorbitant house and rental prices. This doesn't make them homeless. They are contributing members of the community, and many are responsible and helpful. There are just as many people who live in houses that make a mess of our country (like the picnickers who leave nappies lying around ‐ you can't blame that on the tourists). It often seems that those who choose a different lifestyle from the norm are persecuted. If it was gay bashing, or racism, or sexism, people would be up in arms about the way they were treated, but those in motorhomes are often treated just as badly now, and no one says a thing. Rather than restricting "freedom camping" the council should open up more sites, even if a little out of town, or offer free or cheap leases to the NZMCA for overnight parking, or something similar. The "problem" is not going to go away, and the council needs to not be shortsighted about that. Think ten years ahead to what will be needed then, which is even more space for campers, and work towards that.
220
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Western Springs Garden Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 315 Ward: Albert ‐ Eden ‐ Roskill Local Board:
Albert‐Eden
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, significant cultural or historic features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
221
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Pt Erin Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 197 Ward: Waitematā and Gulf Local Board:
Waitematā
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
222
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Swanson Scenic Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 10 Ward: Waitākere Local Board:
Waitākere
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
223
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Cox's Bay Esplanade Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 201 Ward: Waitematā and Gulf Local Board:
Waitematā
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
3 ‐ 4
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
224
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Wingate Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 1 Ward: Whau Local Board:
Whau
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
5 ‐ 6
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
225
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Glasgow Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 210 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
226
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Helensville Civic Centre Grounds Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 212 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
227
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Rautawhiri Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 236 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
228
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Helensville River Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 252 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
229
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Bay City Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 53 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Upper Harbour
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
230
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Coyle Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 314 Ward: Albert ‐ Eden ‐ Roskill Local Board:
Albert‐Eden
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
231
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Dove Myer Robinson Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 189 Ward: Waitematā and Gulf Local Board:
Waitematā
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
232
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Eric Armishaw Park Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 316 Ward: Albert ‐ Eden ‐ Roskill Local Board:
Albert‐Eden
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
5 ‐ 6
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
233
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Fowlds Park Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 317 Ward: Albert ‐ Eden ‐ Roskill Local Board:
Albert‐Eden
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No restriction
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
234
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Raymond Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 318 Ward: Albert ‐ Eden ‐ Roskill Local Board:
Albert‐Eden
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
5 ‐ 6
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
235
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Centennial Park ‐ Campbells Bay Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 328 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
236
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Red Beach Waterfront Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 336 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
237
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Western Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 341 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
238
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Orewa Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 345 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
239
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Metro Park East Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 348 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
240
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Sinclair Park Restriction Type:
Restricted area (non‐self‐contained permitted)
Site ID: 272 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Yes, allow all vehicles to camp in this area
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
241
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Sturges Park Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 120 Ward: Manukau Local Board:
Māngere‐Ōtāhuhu
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
242
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Silverdale War Memorial Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 349 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, significant cultural or historic features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
243
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Hooton Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 43 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Upper Harbour
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
244
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Fred Ambler Lookout Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 202 Ward: Waitematā and Gulf Local Board:
Waitematā
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
5 ‐ 6
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
245
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Rosedale Park Restriction Type:
Restricted area (non‐self‐contained permitted)
Site ID: 44 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Upper Harbour
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
No, only allow certified self‐contained vehicles
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No restriction
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
This is a HUGE park with massive, mostly empty, parking areas, not near housing, so ideal for freedom camping, in the central area of the park too, not just down the roadway beside the ponds.
246
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Constellation Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 51 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Upper Harbour
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
247
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Luckens Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 56 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Upper Harbour
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
248
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Wainoni Park North Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 62 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Upper Harbour
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
249
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Sanders Reserve (and road area by entrance)
Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 66 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Upper Harbour
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
250
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Grey Lynn Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 196 Ward: Waitematā and Gulf Local Board:
Waitematā
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
251
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Seaside Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 113 Ward: Manukau Local Board:
Māngere‐Ōtāhuhu
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
252
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Cox's Bay Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 195 Ward: Waitematā and Gulf Local Board:
Waitematā
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
253
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Waterfront Road Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 122 Ward: Manukau Local Board:
Māngere‐Ōtāhuhu
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
5 ‐ 6
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
254
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Fred Taylor Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 136 Ward: Waitākere Local Board:
Waitākere
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
This park is nowhere near housing, and perfect for freedom camping
255
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Jack Colvin Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 138 Ward: Waitākere Local Board:
Waitākere
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
256
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Jack Pringle Village Green Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 139 Ward: Waitākere Local Board:
Waitākere
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
257
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Moire Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 143 Ward: Waitākere Local Board:
Waitākere
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
258
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Trusts Arena Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 146 Ward: Waitākere Local Board:
Waitākere
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
259
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Margaret Griffen Park Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 168 Ward: Albert ‐ Eden ‐ Roskill Local Board:
Puketāpapa
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
260
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Three Kings Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 169 Ward: Albert ‐ Eden ‐ Roskill Local Board:
Puketāpapa
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
261
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Hobsonville War Memorial Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 42 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Upper Harbour
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
262
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: 32 Kiwi Esplanade and Stone Wall Foreshore
Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 106 Ward: Manukau Local Board:
Māngere‐Ōtāhuhu
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
263
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Anderson's Beach Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 544 Ward: Ōrākei Local Board:
Ōrākei
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
264
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Jellicoe Park and Onehunga War Memorial Pools
Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 399 Ward: Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki Local Board:
Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
5 ‐ 6
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
265
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Killarney Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 510 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Devonport‐Takapuna
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
266
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Quarry Lake Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 514 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Devonport‐Takapuna
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
267
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Kennedy Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 521 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Devonport‐Takapuna
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
268
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Woodall Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 524 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Devonport‐Takapuna
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
269
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Sunnynook Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 526 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Devonport‐Takapuna
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
270
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Takapuna Beach (and roadside parking by Gould Reserve)
Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 529 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Devonport‐Takapuna
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
271
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Panmure Basin (Cleary Road entrance)
Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 397 Ward: Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki Local Board:
Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
272
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Churchill Park (excluding Riddell Rd parking area)
Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 541 Ward: Ōrākei Local Board:
Ōrākei
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
273
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Waikaraka Park (Captain Springs Road entrance)
Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 398 Ward: Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki Local Board:
Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
274
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Madills Farm Recreation Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 546 Ward: Ōrākei Local Board:
Ōrākei
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
275
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: ÅŒrÄ kei Domain Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 547 Ward: Ōrākei Local Board:
Ōrākei
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
276
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Manly Park (boat ramp area) Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 555 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
277
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Judges Bay Reserve and Parnell Baths
Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 564 Ward: Waitematā and Gulf Local Board:
Waitematā
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, significant cultural or historic features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
278
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Taumanu Reserve (Onehunga Foreshore)
Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 566 Ward: Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki Local Board:
Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No restriction
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
279
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Seddon Fields Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 198 Ward: Waitematā and Gulf Local Board:
Waitematā
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
280
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Gulf Harbour Marina Hammerhead Reserve
Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 352 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No restriction
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
281
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Thomas Bloodworth Park and Shore Road Reserve
Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 540 Ward: Ōrākei Local Board:
Ōrākei
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
282
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Island Bay Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 374 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Kaipātiki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
283
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Hatfields Beach Recreation Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 353 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No restriction
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
284
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Stanmore Bay Park Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 354 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No restriction
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
285
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Victor Eaves Park Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 355 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No restriction
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
286
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Chelsea Estate Heritage Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 366 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Kaipātiki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
I believe the NZMCA has approached the council about leasing some land here. Allowing more NZMCA parks in Auckland would go a long way toward solving the freedom camping issue.
287
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Little Shoal Bay Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 368 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Kaipātiki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
288
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Onepoto Domain Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 370 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Kaipātiki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
289
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Onewa Domain Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 371 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Kaipātiki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
290
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Barrys Point Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 504 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Devonport‐Takapuna
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
291
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Sulphur Beach Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 373 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Kaipātiki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
292
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Gloucester Park North Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 396 Ward: Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki Local Board:
Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
5 ‐ 6
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
293
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Dudding Park Restriction Type:
Restricted area (non‐self‐contained permitted)
Site ID: 381 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Kaipātiki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Yes, allow all vehicles to camp in this area
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
294
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Birkenhead War Memorial (John Court Street entrance)
Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 383 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Kaipātiki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No restriction
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
295
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: A F Thomas Park Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 384 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Kaipātiki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
8+
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No restriction
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
296
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Domain Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 386 Ward: Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki Local Board:
Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
297
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Mt Wellington War Memorial Reserve
Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 388 Ward: Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki Local Board:
Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
298
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Panmure Wharf Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 390 Ward: Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki Local Board:
Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
299
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Onehunga Bay Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 393 Ward: Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki Local Board:
Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
300
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Panmure Basin (Peterson Road entrance)
Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 394 Ward: Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki Local Board:
Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
301
# 285
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Kate Dunn
Site Name: Shepherds Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 372 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Kaipātiki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
302
#286
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Barbara Hagen
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: I support the management of freedom camping which to be effective must include adequate resources for this management with clear guidelines and consequences. Currently in the area of interest to me at Mathesons Bay there is flagrant disregard for the council rules with no policing or consequence.d
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
303
#286
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Other
Please tell us why: My concern, demonstrated in what has occurred at Mathesons Bay where freedom camping has been permitted for the last two years, is that inappropriate places such as I believe Mathesons Bay to be will be included in the approved list. Given that there has been no policing of the current council rules I have no faith that resources will be adequate in the future. I fear that the influx of large campervans as well as people casually camping will continue to overrun the current limited parking, picnic and recreational space as well as being a danger to those trying to access the beach and playground area.
In addition the very limited facilities provided for day visitors will continue to be abused by those using them for washing and sanitary purposes.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Other
Please tell us why: I have seen vans showing a windscreen sticker claiming to be self contained which I do not believe can be possible. Again such a requirement will only be effective if it is policed.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
304
#286
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Please tell us why: As demonstrated at Mathesons Bay two nights allows large campervans to set up and swallow up the majority of parking and picnic space on weekends and in particular long weekends when day visitors and residents also would like access. There were 16 campervans and several tents over the recent Anniversary three day weekend which significantly restricted what was available to others.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
I think that Mathesons Bay reserve should not be open for freedom campers at any time.
It is a very small beach which attracts high numbers of day trippers and diving schools. There is limited car parking space and limited space for picnicking and recreational activities. The reserve has been the prime area for the above as well as providing access to the Koherau stream and bush walk where there are kauri trees and many other natives.
This space is advertised as a freedom camping spot on google maps and is currently being treated as such. Over this holiday period there have regularly been eight or nine campervans as well as people in cars and tents staying overnight and longer.
Some have camped right on the edge of the beach making access difficult.
Many use the toilet and outside shower facilities and are definitely not self contained. The toilet block regularly has no toilet paper and has runout of water in the past.
The road to the beach on the western side which gives access to the reserve is steep and narrow. Large potholes have developed recently attributable to the increase in use of heavy vehicles. The reserve itself is primarily swampland and quickly becomes unusable after heavy rain. This causes campervans to park illegally on the beach frontage.
In summary I believe this reserve is entirely unsuitable for any sort of camping
305
# 286
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Barbara Hagen
Site Name: Matheson Bay Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 263 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
I think that Matheson Bay reserve should not be open for freedom campers at any time. It is a very small beach which attracts high numbers of day trippers and diving schools. There is limited car parking space and limited space for picnicking and recreational activities. The reserve has been the prime area for the above as well as providing access to the Koherau stream and bush walk where there are kauri trees and many other natives. This space is advertised as a freedom camping spot on google maps and is currently being treated as such. Over this holiday period there have regularly been eight or nine campervans as well as people in cars and tents staying
306
# 286
overnight and longer. Some have camped right on the edge of the beach making access difficult. Many use the toilet and outside shower facilities and are definitely not self contained. The toilet block regularly has no toilet paper and has runout of water in the past. The road to the beach on the western side which gives access to the reserve is steep and narrow. Large potholes have developed recently attributable to the increase in use of heavy vehicles. The reserve itself is primarily swampland and quickly becomes unusable after heavy rain. This causes campervans to park illegally on the beach frontage. In summary I believe this reserve is entirely unsuitable for any sort of camping
307
#295
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Ian Smith
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Currently the act does not achieve a desirable outcome
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
308
#295
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: in my opinion freedom camping is difficult to control and leads to situations in which people do not follow the guidelines. For example at Matheson Bay there are frequently people camping and equally people who do not fit the guidelines. Clearly the existing situation does not work
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: If freedom campers are to use public facilities surely they should pay for their upkeep
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: however who will monitor this?
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
309
#295
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 8am
Please tell us why: many desirable areas for overnight camping are also high day use areas.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
I think freedom camping should be restricted to areas where there is not an alternative and where such camping does not impinge on day usage.
310
#296
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Amanda Bennett
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: What is the point of having a ban on something, but there being no consequences if the rules are broken.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
311
#296
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: An area we visit weekly is often full of campers and it can be difficult to find a space to park our car to pick our kid's up.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: It makes sense to only allow vehicles that are not self contained access to 24 hour facilities, and have those that are self contained cam elsewhere as they don't need those facilities.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: To prevent campers staying for long periods and taking up space that others may want to utilise.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
312
#296
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why: Yes, but what time will they be allowed to return. Our son attends Orewa Sea Scouts, and Arundel Reserve is often full of campers during the evening when parents are needing to pick the children up (8pm), and it can be difficult to find an empty space meaning we have to park on the grass.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
313
# 296
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Amanda Bennett
Site Name: Arundel Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 347 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Arundel Reserve is home to Orewa Sea Scouts where young children visit on a weekly basis. The carpark is often full of campers making it difficult to park to pick up the children. Not only that, I feel it is unsafe to have transient people so near where children frequent. Arundel is also a popular carpark during the summer for families visiting the northern end of Orewa Beach.
314
#300
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Gavin Brough
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: The law should be enforced with penalties for the rule breakers to have any effect.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
315
#300
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Provided the vehicle complies and is certified as self contained yes.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: For health and safety reasons
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
316
#300
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 10am
Please tell us why: 10 am allows time to enjoy the space longer before vacating.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
317
#306
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Stan. Armiger
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Most people are fine but there needs to be are fine for those cowboys that do not abide by the bylaw.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
318
#306
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Agree with the above but for those that break the law they must be caught and fined.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Agree but the council must have the ability to find and fine those that do not keep within the bylaws.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: Agree for all the reasons listed above.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
319
#306
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 10am
Please tell us why: 10am is a more realistic departure time as those in vans are on holiday therefore do not want to be rushed and the carparks do not normally start filling until after this time.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
My biggest concern is that the bylaws are not being governed at all by the council.
I suggest that there would be some residents who overlook the park site who would be willing to contact someone in authority employed by the council to be called on to advise infringing campers and if necessary issue fines to those that do not comply.
320
#309
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Philip Beech
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Council actions to date have been pitiful. (In a recent article council intend to enforce restrictions by visiting sites in the morning. Its too late they have already breached the rules.)
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
321
#309
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
322
#309
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
323
That the proposal does not mention anything about enforcement
Council actions to date have been pitiful. (In a recent article council intend to enforce restrictions by visiting sites in the morning. Its too late they have already breached the rules.)
I accept council cant be every where all the time, what is the plan to allow the public to quickly contact council to enforce a breach.
A message needs to be sent to all freedom campers that breaching will be enforced. If all NZ councils blitzed all areas in nz for the same 2 weeks at the start of summer would quickly get out that you can no longer break the rules.
I was at a reserve recently marked no camping self contained vehicles only , 4 rental vehicles tuned up, some visitors tented some slept in the cars, All used the trees for toileting.
In the following photo over 20 campers were saying overnight, council is not adequately enforcing its own rules. The rules are a complete waste of time if not enforced
#309
324
That proposed freedom camping rules do not mention anything about education of visiting freedom campers, in particular
1) The maps in the information packs are filed alphabeticity and by region. Visitors are not going to be able to wade through that information and establish where they can and can not camp. Even Auckland residents would struggle. Its essential that an app based map be available and updated
2) Existing map based apps need to be updated 3) The signage at reserves needs to be clearer (see note1) 4) Purchasers of all self contained vehicles need to be made aware that the certification of
small vans will soon to expire and no longer be considered self contained.
Note 1
Example or confusing signs BOTH located at Arundel reserve in 2018 (now removed)
#309
325
#309
326
#309
327
# 309
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Philip Beech
Site Name: Arundel Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 347 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
See attached document
328
#313
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Gay Williams
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
329
#313
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
330
#313
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Matheson Bay near Leigh is most unsuitable for unrestricted freedom camping
We have had many issues with campers over the past years and will be very displeased if this area is not included in restricted areas
331
# 313
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Gay Williams
Site Name: Matheson Bay Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 263 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No response
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
No response
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No response
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Matheson Bay near Leigh is most unsuitable for unrestricted freedom camping. We have had many issues with campers over the past years and will be very displeased if this area is not included in restricted areas.
332
#314
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Christine Dormer
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
333
#314
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
334
#314
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
I believe that Matheson Bay in Leigh is not suitable for freedom campers as the beach is not large enough to support camping and parking area is often too wet to support Camper Vans.
335
# 314
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Christine Dormer
Site Name: Matheson Bay Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 263 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
No response
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No response
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
I believe that Matheson Bay in Leigh is not suitable for freedom campers as the beach is not large enough to support camping and parking area is often too wet to support Camper Vans.
Hi, l am contacting you regarding Freedom Camping.The other day at Matheson Bay , Leigh l drove down on the southern side of the beach and as l went to park in the paddock at the back l found that because cars were parked alongside the bollards next to the grass on the right cars were unable to pass in or out of the area.
336
# 314
I met a camper van trying to exit the parking area and found that l had to back up about 10 meters so he could pass.
If there was an emergency and an ambulance had to attend an accident it would have been impossible for one to get through.
As it happened 1/2 an hour later there was an emergency at the beach where a woman had an epileptic fit swimming out to the pontoon and 2 fire engines, 3 ambulances, a helicopter and 2 Police cars had to attend.They went down on the Northern Side of the beach ,luckily not the southern side. We urgently need the Southern side to be cleaned up and diagonal parking lines to be painted and yellow “NO PARKING “ lines to be painted along side the bollards.
We also do not need to have Freedom Campers at Matheson Bay as it such a small Bay there are not the facilities for Freedom Campers .
337
#317
338
#317
339
#317
340
#317
341
#317
342
#317
343
#321
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Linda Stevens
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
344
#321
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
345
#321
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 10am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Mathesons Bay
I am not in support of Freedom Camping in Mathesons Bay or Omaha area.
346
# 321
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Linda Stevens
Site Name: Matheson Bay Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 263 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
I am not in support of Freedom Camping in Mathesons Bay or Omaha area.
347
# 321
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Linda Stevens
Site Name: Omaha Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 229 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
I am not in support of Freedom Camping in Mathesons Bay or Omaha area.
348
#325
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Louise Wallace
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Because fines are after the fact.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
349
#325
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: It is not something we want to increase. It is destroying our environment and can lead to violent situations with locals.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: By the time you check they will have defecated and gone.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
350
#325
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
351
# 325
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Louise Wallace
Site Name: William Fraser Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (non‐self‐contained permitted)
Site ID: 269 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Thus area has access to protected bird life and is beside a children’s playground. Totally unsuited for freedom camping.
352
#327
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Kerry Pool
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
353
#327
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
354
#327
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Sort out the problems you already have with freedom campers don't make more mess in New Zealand. People have to pay, work on places that already have campers.
355
#330
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Shona Scandrett
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Freedom campers are not from the ical area and do not care about the local area and have been known to abuse the opportunity of free camping. Our local area of Omaha is clean and I would like to see it remain that way.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
356
#330
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: However some areas should be a no go.
The car park is in a residential area and we like that it is closed up at night and safe.5
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: However the toilet at omaha is not always used and we have had people peeibg ob our fence rather than use the toilet down by the surf club.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why: Really dont want freedom camping at omaha at all.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
357
#330
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 8am
Please tell us why: People using the beach use the parking and not many spaces on a good day. Freedom campers should be excluded from this beach.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Freedom camping should be restricted to certain areas not in residential areas.
There should be strict littering rules in place.
358
#331
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Stephen Hamilton
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
359
#331
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
360
#331
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
361
# 331
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Stephen Hamilton
Site Name: William Fraser Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (non‐self‐contained permitted)
Site ID: 269 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Until public toilet facilities are upgraded ‐ unable to cater for campers.
362
# 331
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Stephen Hamilton
Site Name: Omaha Beach Boat Launching and Wharf
Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 228 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow all vehicles to camp in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Limited to overnight stay only for 2 ‐ 3 campers
363
#332
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Peter Pettit
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
364
#332
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
365
#332
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
To the extent there is any freedom camping in developed areas in Auckland it must be limited self‐contained vehicles. Non self contained vehicles should be required to go to public and privately owned camping grounds, it is common sense. Why should rate payers fund the use of public toilets etc by campers this does not make sense and is simply a cross subsidy. Freedom camping using non self contained vehicles is causing havoc in NZ as constantly reported with council and local needing to clean up afterwards and will lead to major health problems. The council should set up an Air BNB equivalent web site site for non self contained vehicles to use private residential properties when parking overnight. Self contained vehicles will become a large form of permanent accomodation in NZ as baby boomers rent out their homes long term and travel overseas and before they move into retirement villages so a lot of thought needs to go into this.
366
# 332
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Peter Pettit
Site Name: Pukemateko Reserve Omaha South Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 255 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
In the holidays this carpark becomes full very and congested early in the morning by surfers, dog walkers and the surf school with parking on the grass areas. This will likely lead to confrontations with overnight campers.
367
#345
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Robert Buckett
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation?
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: I agree with changing the by‐law to give authority to issue fines but the fines are insufficient as a deterrent and, based on the lack of enforcement of other by‐laws (eg. dogs on the beach and driving on beaches) the by‐law is likely to fall into disrepute. Freedom Camping should be restricted to designated area that have appropriate services (toilets, rubbish, time limits, capacity) available that those using the area pay to use.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
368
#345
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: I agree with increasing the designated areas, the number of vehicles that can stay and the type and length of stay. However, Freedom Camping should be restricted to designated area that have appropriate services (toilets, rubbish, time limits, capacity) available that those using the area pay to use.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: I agree with this proposal in principle but the 'designated areas' need to be agreed and accepted by those in the area ‐ similar to a Resource Consent requiring approval of the 'affected parties'.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow more than 2 nights
Please tell us why: Freedom Camping should be restricted to designated area that have appropriate services (toilets, rubbish, time limits, capacity) available that those using the area pay to use. If that occurs, a 3 or 4 night stay could be acceptable in the designated area that the Freedom Campers pay to use.
369
#345
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, other
Please tell us why: Freedom Camping should be restricted to designated area that have appropriate services (toilets, rubbish, time limits, capacity) available that those using the area pay to use. If that occurs, a 3 or 4 night stay could be acceptable in the designated area that the Freedom Campers pay to use.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
370
# 345
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Robert Buckett
Site Name: Rita Way, Excelsior Way, Lagoon Way
Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 257 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Freedom Camping should be approved by the affected neighbours ‐ similar to a Resource Consent. I believe that approval is unlikely in that area
371
#349
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Michael Whaley
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Think there should be no freedom camping ....campers should have to use licenced camping grounds that provide adequate facilities for rubbish, noise control etc
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
372
#349
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Ratepayers should come first funds and resources should not be wasted on these activities. If you want to camp you pay in a proper camping ground.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Restrict all camping to proper camping grounds.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why: As I have already said camping grounds are the correct place for camping....it will be left to the ratepayers to monitor this with the possibility of aggressive behaviour from campers when complaints are lodged. Do not believe the council has the resources to police camping nor the money.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
373
#349
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, other
Please tell us why: How are you going to police this without causing friction between daytime users and freedom campers? Just simply see this proposal as a nothing proposal.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
374
#356
375
#357
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Campbell Armstrong
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: People will always push the boundaries & spoil it for the majority.
There needs to be accontability
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
376
#357
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: This is a growing trend, and it is better to deal with it, than ignore it.
Sensible regulations far out‐way open slather
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Otherwise we get people soiling our parks and reserves.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: Seems a reasonable regulation allowing many people to make use of the facilities
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
377
#357
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why: 9 am is when most shops open. It seems reasonable to use this time.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
I think council is doing the right thing by extending these areas
378
# 357
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Campbell Armstrong
Site Name: Fishermans Rock Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 330 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
379
#359
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Adrianne Barrrie
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
380
#359
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
381
#359
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Freedom camping is a privilege and not a right. All campers etc need to be properly self‐contained so there is minimal effect on the environment.
382
#373
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Bettyanne Rutter
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
383
#373
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
384
#373
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
385
# 373
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Bettyanne Rutter
Site Name: Omaha Beach Boat Launching and Wharf
Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 228 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
This is the only boat launching ramp for local community. During the summer there is not enough parking for cars and boat trailers. The current overflow is out on the road across the front of people’s property. There is not enough space for additional user types like camping vehicles
386
#375
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Shane Armitage
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
387
#375
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
388
#375
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
I think all council car park areas with a 24 hour toilet should be available for freedom camping. I think the council should be more proactive in informing people that the vehicle is not up to standard and asking them to move on . I have spent A large amounts of money on my camper and it is compliant and I don’t like being treated like a criminal by local council in Forseman offices
389
# 375
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Shane Armitage
Site Name: Pt Erin Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 197 Ward: Waitematā and Gulf Local Board:
Waitematā
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
390
# 375
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Shane Armitage
Site Name: Dove Myer Robinson Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 189 Ward: Waitematā and Gulf Local Board:
Waitematā
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
391
# 375
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Shane Armitage
Site Name: Auckland Domain Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 188 Ward: Waitematā and Gulf Local Board:
Waitematā
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
392
# 375
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Shane Armitage
Site Name: Muriwai Village Green Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 227 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
393
# 375
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Shane Armitage
Site Name: Muriwai Beach Playground Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 226 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
394
# 375
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Shane Armitage
Site Name: Victoria Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 194 Ward: Waitematā and Gulf Local Board:
Waitematā
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
395
#387
396
#387
397
#387
398
#387
399
#387
400
#387
401
#390
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Vickie Mcmahon
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: You should be self contained. Plus you want the tourists then supply them with a area for non self contained vehicles eg: young overseas tourists ....to camp.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
402
#390
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Because those campervans aren't disposing of the human waste over the ground. It's very expensive to make your campervan self contained why should theY that have csc be punished when it's usually 90% overseas young tourists travelling on a budget. If they can't afford csc of their purchased vans then put them in campgrounds or fine them.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: We agree....but with such alot of homeless people living in cars etc this needs to be patrolled regularly
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
403
#390
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
404
#394
405
#394
406
#394
407
#394
408
#394
409
#394
410
#404
411
#404
412
#404
413
#404
414
#404
415
#404
416
#404
417
#404
418
#412
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: glenda hislop
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
419
#412
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: this may stop people thinking freedom parking is there right and to stay as long as the wish.It is a privilege to have freedom camp park as we should all abide by the rules
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: So that people keep moving on to all locations
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
420
#412
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 10am
Please tell us why: little more time to have a coffee and look around the shops witch most open i thought 9 am,
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
421
# 412
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
glenda hislop
Site Name: ÅŒrÄ kei Domain Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 547 Ward: Ōrākei Local Board:
Ōrākei
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
7 ‐ 8
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 2 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, significant cultural or historic features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
422
#414
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: margaret revell
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Other
Please tell us why: $200 fines are too expensive, people are usually overworked and in desperate need of rest, without horrific expenses, $100 fines are very threatening for most people are serve as a strong deterrent.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
423
#414
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: All self‐contained vehicles should be allowed freedom camping everywhere
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: we can aim to keep all areas clean and fresh and with the increasing tourist trade we need to be vigilent.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow more than 2 nights
Please tell us why: how does maximum stay of 2 nights encourage irresponsible campers to join the majority of responsible campers? explain how 3 ‐ 4 allowable nights changes them.
travellers want to move on and on, but local retired nz's want 3 ‐ 4 nights to breath in and rest in each new place.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
424
#414
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 10am
Please tell us why: lots of us are 70+ and don't have the teenage energy that demands up and at 'em.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
425
# 414
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
margaret revell
Site Name: 32 Kiwi Esplanade and Stone Wall Foreshore
Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 106 Ward: Manukau Local Board:
Māngere‐Ōtāhuhu
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
426
# 414
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
margaret revell
Site Name: Blockhouse Bay Recreation Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 6 Ward: Whau Local Board:
Whau
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
427
# 414
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
margaret revell
Site Name: Blockhouse Bay Beach Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 5 Ward: Whau Local Board:
Whau
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
428
# 414
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
margaret revell
Site Name: 84 Kiwi Esplanade Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 116 Ward: Manukau Local Board:
Māngere‐Ōtāhuhu
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
5 ‐ 6
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
429
# 414
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
margaret revell
Site Name: Achilles Crescent Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 502 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Devonport‐Takapuna
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
430
# 414
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
margaret revell
Site Name: Allenby Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 385 Ward: Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki Local Board:
Maungakiekie‐Tāmaki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
431
# 414
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
margaret revell
Site Name: Birkenhead War Memorial (John Court Street entrance)
Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 383 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Kaipātiki
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
No response
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
432
# 414
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
margaret revell
Site Name: Auckland Domain Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 188 Ward: Waitematā and Gulf Local Board:
Waitematā
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
433
#426
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Eric Williams
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Free camping in areas of popular carparks in Rodney is becoming intolerable.
I am a member of NZMCA and caravan a great deal There are some members and overseas tourists that overstay their welcome by camping in non camping areas or staying longer than the stipulated time.
Currently on the Whangaparaoa peninsula and Orewa campers are parking longer than permitted times. Park side ways across 2 or 3 parking spaces.
Who is going to enforce the new and existing by laws?
We have few all weather concrete boat ramps boaties quite often have to park trailers on grass verges.
Auckland Council proposals are fine but those North of the harbour bridge are all too aware of what happens in AUCKLAND doesn't necessarily include north of the bridge.
434
#426
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Enforcement is very difficult who these days takes much notice of signs.
Public toilets where camping is allowed are becoming a kitchen and laundry area.
NOT a TOILET Facility only
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
435
#426
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: How will you enforce this on our MANY carparks
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
436
#428
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Paul Plester
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
437
#428
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Areas with Toilets and other facilities should be made available
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: This is going to be impossible to manage and there will not be managed
Only allow Freedom camping in areas with 24 Public Toilets.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
438
#428
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, other
Please tell us why: Again this is going to be impossible to manage and will get ignored
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
We have many low cost Camping grounds around the Auckland region that provide all the facilities required.
Why don't we encourage Campers to use those rate paying businesses ?
439
# 428
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Paul Plester
Site Name: Sunrise Boulevard (Snells Beach) Restriction Type:
Restricted area (non‐self‐contained permitted)
Site ID: 271 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
No I do not believe there are any other suitable freedom camping sites in Omaha, and I strongly disagree with OBC's suggestion in the recent newsletter and online that 198 Mangatawhiri Rd be considered as a suitable alternative. I believe 198 Mangaawhiri Rd should be scheduled as a prohibited site.
440
#432
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: suzanne wilkinson
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
441
#432
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
442
#432
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
My concern is not local van owners but overseas tourists. On our travels we meet and speak to slit of visitors
Many tourists believe that “freedom “ camping in NZ means anywhere you want to , you can stay. This is apparently reiterated by van rental companies (although I am sure not in writing)
Perhaps fining the rental companies (who own the vans) if they are illegally parked will assist in fixing some of the problem (just as the owner of a car illegally parked will receive a parking fine)
443
#435
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Debra Kamphuis
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Other
Please tell us why: I am a CSC member of NZMCA. I believe it is my right to "park" my campervan where I please as I am of NO harm to others and I am respectful of other people in the area I choose to park. At the same time I am against overseas tourists "camping" in their vans abusing the system. I feel that others are spoiling the rights of NZ citizens in their abuse of the system.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
444
#435
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Other
Please tell us why: I want to be allowed to "park" my motorhome where I choose, with respect. I don't feel it is fair to fine NZ citizens if they are CSC.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
445
#435
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 10am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
I just want is considered that we as NZ citizens welcome and encourage tourism. We, however are the ratepayers and have expectations of our councils to provide to us as their priority. I am not sure how this could be done but for example ‐ if a club has policies in place for members to be responsible "campers", which is the incorrect word to use, (we are merely parking our vehicles and sleeping in them), perhaps we are not subject to the same bylaws????? Maybe we shouldn't incur a fine???? This subject needs more out of the box thinking.
Thanks for the opportunity to have our say.
446
# 435
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Debra Kamphuis
Site Name: 20 ‐ 24 Uxbridge Carparking Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 480 Ward: Howick Local Board:
Howick
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
3 ‐ 4
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
447
# 435
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Debra Kamphuis
Site Name: Hatfields Beach Recreation Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 353 Ward: Albany Local Board:
Hibiscus & Bays
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
5 ‐ 6
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 3 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
448
# 435
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Debra Kamphuis
Site Name: Puhoi Pioneer's Memorial Park Domain
Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 235 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's rarely full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Living in the are and being NZMCA CSC I think it is a privilege to share our beautiful piece of paradise with visitors. There seems to be no problems and I walk this area 3‐5 time a week.
449
# 435
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Debra Kamphuis
Site Name: Jamieson Bay Esplanade Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 216 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No, allow certified self‐contained vehicles
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
I don't know
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
450
#438
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Margaret Truscott
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
451
#438
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: There are many camp grounds they can use with close proximity to the city and surrounds.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Other
Please tell us why: I am a member of the NZMCA and have a fully self contained and certified vehicle. The number of small van/station wagon type vehicles that show a self containment sticker with NO shower and a portaloo which is never used makes me furious. They are NOT fully self contained having no washing facilities with me witnessing people urinating, washing their teeth and throwing grey water from their pots onto the ground is just NOT ON. They should be in camping grounds where these facilities are available. I cannot understand why we are putting in toilets everywhere when there are camping grounds and DOC passes they can buy where facilities are available. They leave a mess everywhere. The last pair I witnessed were washing their dishes at the dump station in Gulf Harbour where the water was not for human consumption. On trips around the country we have been disgusted with the bland disregard for our clean green environment and even where toilets are available relieving themselves by their vans when the toilets are a short walk away. Why, when camper are self contained are we providing toilets when they should use their onboard ones.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
452
#438
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
We are totally fed up with the plague of small vehicles polluting the country.
453
#440
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Jeffrey Walkington
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: There is a need to back up the bylaws and a fine or at least the threat of a fine maybe enough.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
454
#440
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: There needs to be enough spaces to allow for the growth in tourism but careful management is required. The so called popular places need protection from the abuse some freedom campers inflict.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: I wonder who is going to check that the onboard toilet is being used and not the bushes behind the parking spot, We have experienced this first hand and it is not pretty to stumble onto or into.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: These parking spots are possibly in prime locations and should be allocated as high turnover so more campers get to use the area.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
455
#440
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 10am
Please tell us why: Still not sure who is going to police all of these new rules, in all of these new areas, 10am is more in keeping with holiday mode as long as this bylaw doesn't conflict with proposal 4
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
456
# 440
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Jeffrey Walkington
Site Name: Rautawhiri Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 236 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
457
# 440
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Jeffrey Walkington
Site Name: Helensville Civic Centre Grounds Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 212 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
No response
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
458
#447
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Peter Hunt
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: the current proposal is that Freedom Camping is permitted unless prohibited or restricted. It should be prohibited unless in a designated area ‐ as per legacy bylaw. Breach of that bylaw can be enforced by fine.
I disagree with losing the current protections against camping in our residential streets and outside our homes that our current legacy bylaws deliver.
I understand that it is an advantage to add the ability to fine to support enforcement, however this is a small component in an otherwise unsatisfactory proposed bylaw.
I cannot support the core components of the new freedom camping bylaw that places the majority of our Omaha Beach streets and roadside parking in the “not scheduled†areas.
I disagree with NO general rules for camping in a vehicle in the “not scheduled†areas.
Our homes and residential streets surround the heavily utilised public facilities at Omaha Beach. Parking at these facilities, for the only all tide boat ramp in the district and the popular beach reserves are, at times, over flowing.
459
#447
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Currently the vehicles overflow from these areas directly onto roadside parking outside our homes. Under the proposed bylaw these roads will be “not scheduled†. This will allow unrestricted freedom camping in any vehicle, for an unlimited period, outside our homes. 24/7, with no ability to enforce. This is a totally unacceptable.
Once Omaha Beach reserves are advertised as freedom camping spots, we know from our day visitor volumes that the demand from freedom campers will also be extremely high. Our residential streets will be the first location that freedom campers will go when the proposed designated freedom camping car parks in the Omaha reserves are full.
The immediate impact of no general rules in “not scheduled†areas is magnified by the popularity and high visitor numbers to Omaha Beach and would have a dramatic effect on the loss of privacy, amenity and access for Omaha Beach residents and visitors.
Tauranga City’s freedom camping bylaw prohibits camping in front of a private residence or business, self contained vehicles only and a limit on nights. The “not scheduled†areas in Auckland should also have such provisions to protect basic amenity and access in highly utilised areas that are also residential areas like Omaha Beach.
Camping is prohibited in the Omaha Beach reserves through the Reserves Act 1977, unless Auckland Council chooses to utilise a Ministerial Consent to overturn these protections.
I believe that democracy should be applied and the current protections should only be overturned if the majority of the ratepayers of Omaha Beach agree to this change in status. If no such mandate is given, then these reserves should remain unchanged.
In a recent survey, over 85% of Omaha residents stated they did not want freedom camping in our Omaha reserves. Auckland Council do not have this mandate from the people of Omaha Beach.
Under the Reserves Act 1977 our Omaha Beach ‘’reserves are to be protected and preserved†.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
460
#447
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Please tell us why: Freedom camping has a significant and deleterious effect on the environment. The essential requirement is to make sure there are enough places for camp sites at a reasonable cost. Campers need to realise there is a cost of rubbish disposal, toilet facilities, water etc that they need to pay for.
I strongly disagree with Auckland Council in overturning the camping prohibitions in Omaha Beach reserves.
I disagree with Auckland Council on their principal that spreading the problem will alleviate the problem. Spreading and promoting availability will encourage an overwhelming number of campers to popular Omaha Beach.
The recognised ‘primary and secondary harms’ from freedom camping at the current 14 sites in Auckland will be greatly magnified due to Omaha Beach’s heavy visitor numbers, proximity to Auckland and unsuitability of the reserves in Omaha Beach to handle the camping requirements.
There are already some ongoing issues with freedom campers in Omaha Beach – although Auckland Council may not be aware of these when selecting “restricted†sites for freedom camping.
There are 10 camping grounds within 15 minutes’ drive of Omaha Beach, including on Omaha Flats Road and across the estuary at Whangateau. The area has designated freedom camping places within 10‐15 minutes’ drive and non‐designated spots well away from residential areas right across Rodney.
The combination of advertised reserves for freedom camping and no general rules in the “not scheduled†areas will in fact deliver the opposite of restricting and managing freedom camping at Omaha Beach. It will result in creating primary and secondary harms from the designated reserves plus open up nearly all the streets and outside our homes to unlimited and unrestricted camping indefinitely.
The reserves designated for freedom camping at Omaha Beach are unsuitable, and they do not meet the requirements set by Auckland Council for successful freedom camping, and nor do any of the three meet any of the criteria set by Auckland Council to mitigate the primary and secondary harms from freedom camping.
The whole of Omaha Beach needs to receive a prohibited status.
Restrictions in general – re number of vehicles, certified self‐contained only, and number of nights generally are a good idea, but without adequate enforcement they will fail.
Council have already failed to adequately manage the enforcement in 14 sites across Auckland, and have publicity stated (in their meeting minutes) that no further resource will be allocated to this enforcement. While restrictions in theory are a good initiative, the ability to enforce is vital.
The “not scheduled†areas must have general rules and I am suggesting ‐No camping in front a private residence or business, limit 2 nights and in a certified self‐contained van only
 
Proposal 3
461
#447
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: I disagree with this. All camping vehicles should be certified self‐contained, and this is for restricted freedom camping sites and also very importantly for “not scheduled†areas. Very few public toilets remain unlocked at night so access to toilets 24/7 is very hard to achieve and are not available at Omaha Beach.
Self‐contained vehicles is the approach that has been adopted by other City Councils. Eg Tauranga City, whose bylaw has freedom camping only in certified self‐contained vehicles, restricted to a maximum 2 nights and not in front of a private residence or business.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why: I strongly disagree with Auckland Council in overturning the camping prohibitions in Omah
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
462
#447
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, other
Please tell us why: I strongly disagree with Auckland Council in overturning the camping prohibitions in Omaha Beach reserves for any length of stay. Given the comments we have provided above, we fundamentally disagree with any times being provided.
For any time restrictions to be effective the Council needs to enforce both a check‐in time and a departure time. No check‐in times have been provided for comment.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
198 Mangatawhiri Rd should not be considered an option for Freedom Camping. OBC did not properly consult with its members before making that suggestion. The site is reserve, no toilets, in a residential area.
463
# 447
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Peter Hunt
Site Name: Pukemateko Reserve Omaha South Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 255 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
No response
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No response
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
464
# 447
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Peter Hunt
Site Name: Omaha Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 229 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
465
# 447
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Peter Hunt
Site Name: Omana Esplanade Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 433 Ward: Franklin Local Board:
Franklin
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
466
# 447
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Peter Hunt
Site Name: William Fraser Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (non‐self‐contained permitted)
Site ID: 269 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
No response
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No response
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
467
# 447
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Peter Hunt
Site Name: Omaha Beach Boat Launching and Wharf
Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 228 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
468
#456
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Roger McKinlay
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Other
Please tell us why: What a fuss this issue has created, when it seems obvious that the simple solution would be to have a national standard to define Self‐Contained so that those who truly are self ‐contained can freedom camp but those who are in glorified people‐movers have to stay in a camp ground (where they should be).
It would be a pity to lose the ability to park overnight at some beautiful spot in a properly self‐contained van because by‐laws have been enacted that restrict the available sites due, ultimately, to an over‐issue of 'self‐contained' stickers to vehicles that aren't self‐contained at all.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
469
#456
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Other
Please tell us why: Rather than enact new rules, why not develop an enforceable standard for 'self containment' ‐ maybe change the colour so the present Blue stickers are no longer valid ‐ and ensure that only properly licensed 'self‐contained' vehicle are allowed to freedom camp.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Other
Please tell us why: The present plethora of so called 'Self‐contained' freedom campers (often tourists) is laughable. Most of these vehjcles wouldn't even have room for a potty toilet, and are in no way 'self‐contained' as the ordinary person would expect. The issue is about the definition & issue of self‐contained certification and this is what shouldd be addressed
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: Share our beauty places with travellers, not permanents
470
#456
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 10am
Please tell us why: Lines up with Camp Grounds
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
What a fuss this issue has created, when it seems obvious that the simple solution would be to have a national standard to define Self‐Contained so that those who truly are self ‐contained can freedom camp but those who are in glorified people‐movers have to stay in a camp ground (where they should be).
It would be a pity to lose the ability to park overnight at some beautiful spot in a properly self‐contained van because by‐laws have been enacted that restrict the available sites due, ultimately, to an over‐issue of 'self‐contained' stickers to vehicles that aren't self‐contained at all ‐ this is the real nub of the present problem
471
#457
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Darryl Studholme
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: As the proposal states the aim would be to manage freedom camping and I'm in favour of some controls and guidelines so that campers clearly understand their rights and responsibilities.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
472
#457
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Again clarity of areas, stay duration's and the type of vehicles should help all campers.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: My view is that many smaller vans that display a supposed certified self‐contained vehicle sticker are just people movers and do not appear to have any safe and healthy method of collecting and storing human waste.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: There are plenty of other options available through the NZMCA parks and private areas that are available for those who are willing to pay.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
473
#457
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 10am
Please tell us why: Moving on by 10 is the usual standard for most accommodation types such as motels, hotels and camp grounds and allows those arriving in a new area the chance to find space.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
474
# 457
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Darryl Studholme
Site Name: Huapai Recreation Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 214 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, other important features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Close to school and a widely used cricket and soccer sports area and used for dog walking and exercise.
475
#466
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Ian Draper
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
476
#466
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
477
#466
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
People wanting to visit NZ and camp should stay at purpose built campsites of which there are many in the area or backpackers, hostels or motels.
There are good and bad free campers and to police this will cost too much money. Please do not spend my tax payers money on this when there are far bigger issues to address.
It is illegal to freedom camp in Europe
478
# 466
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Ian Draper
Site Name: Omaha Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 229 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Often
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
479
#473
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Lynn Ryder
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: I believe the 2011 freedom camping act needs to be totally redacted and the power to ban camping and issue fines needs to be handed back to the councils who have to deal with this acts fallout. While I agree that councils should be able to fine people re freedom camping there needs to be a whole raft of changes in order for the cost of freedom camping kit to be born by the local residents it effects
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
480
#473
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: Freedom camping is a bad idea. Unless it is totally regulated and paid for by the people camping it should not happen. It will and already has had a negative impact on the environment and the communities that have to put up with an influx of them at certain times if the year. The freedom camp sites should not be increased. They should be abolished and the Govt should instead help and encourage proper controlled camp sites to be set up in the areas that have had heavy use. Without these controls and policing it is basically a free for all‐ except the local residents who again pay for the privilege of someone else to have a holiday and leave a mess.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: It would be great if this could happen but again unless it’s policed it will not. I have seen with my own eyes a campervan occupant using the bushes to go to the toilet instead of their van because they don’t want to have to clean it out!!! I believe that freedom camping should not happen on sites without a toilet and that the campers should be charged a minimum fee when entering the country per day they intend to stay here which will cover the cost if policing their certification and cleaning the toilet blocks out that they will use.
It was appalling to see waste and toilet paper all around a freedom camp site at the end of mirror lake in Milford. It was bad nz clean image and worse a public health issue.
This is not working and the council needs to let the Govt know this.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
481
#473
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why: I don’t think there should be freedom camp sites unless they are fully policed and paid for by the campers‐ therefore I don’t end up paying to policevthem and clean up their rubbish and toilets.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, other
Please tell us why: In Ellerslie we for some reason have no restrictions on any of our parks. This ya nit good we have issues with lack of parking during the day as it is that start at 7am and go to 6pm . Unless you are going to say from 8pm to 6am is allowed it will simply not work in our area. People going boating also sometimes use boat ramp areas I.e Omaha. From anytime at sunrise 5.30am onwards to up to 9.30 at night. If camping is allowed in this area in Omaha in particular it will restrict access for boat ramp users which is normally fully full in both car parks. And again who is going to police this. It will have to be done every morning and evening. The cost to us just keeps going up.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
I believe due to the lack of infrastructure to support any increase in summer occupation along the whole Omaha spit that freedom camping should be ruled out for this area. This will help the viability of the existing campsites so that they will remain and also support our Doc camping ground.
Without major money being spent to upgrade and add more toilet blocks and therefore re engineer the sewer system for the Omaha area, without adding numerous rubbish bins and providing a daily clean service for each of them, without patrolling each day to check and control campervan numbers and use this will be a problem just like Thames Coromandel Council have found out.
482
#473
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
You can hope for the best of campers but there will always be the ones that do not adhere to freedom camping rules.
I believe the whole freedom camping government policy needs to be redacted and instead support should be given to existing camp grounds and people who wish to set up new camp grounds in areas around New Zealand.
Just as a side note you might want to look at where you have positioned the camping area at Matheson Bay as well as there is no road access to this piece of ground.
483
# 473
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Lynn Ryder
Site Name: William Fraser Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (non‐self‐contained permitted)
Site ID: 269 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Car park always full and overflowing over summer. No water supply. Basic toilet facilities linked to surf clubrooms. Right next to area of Dune restoration. Just down from sensitive bird nesting area.
484
# 473
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Lynn Ryder
Site Name: Matheson Bay Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 263 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No response
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
No response
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No response
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
I believe due to the lack of infrastructure to support any increase in summer occupation along the whole Omaha spit that freedom camping should be ruled out for this area. This will help the viability of the existing campsites so that they will remain and also support our Doc camping ground. Without major money being spent to upgrade and add more toilet blocks and therefore re engineer the sewer system for the Omaha area, without adding numerous rubbish bins and providing a daily clean service for each of them, without patrolling each day to check and control campervan numbers and use this will be a problem just like Thames Coromandel Council have found
485
# 473
out. You can hope for the best of campers but there will always be the ones that do not adhere to freedom camping rules. I believe the whole freedom camping government policy needs to be redacted and instead support should be given to existing camp grounds and people who wish to set up new camp grounds in areas around New Zealand. Just as a side note you might want to look at where you have positioned the camping area at Matheson Bay as well as there is no road access to this piece of ground.
486
# 473
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Lynn Ryder
Site Name: Pukemateko Reserve Omaha South Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 255 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Right next to a children's playground. Right next to tennis courts which are restricted for the use of Omaha south residents(how is this going to be controlled. Direct access to beach across sensitive dune revegetation area. Vermin trying to be controlled in this area. Area heavily used during summer for sports events.
487
#474
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Karen Schade
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: I dont want Freedom Camping at all in NZ. It is out‐dated. Too many people shitting pissing and leaving toilet paper and faeces on walking tracks, in bush lands, there is simply too many people to be able to provide freedom camping that is sustainable and friendly to the environment. By opening MORE freedom camping areas, you are simply broadening the problem and it makes absolutely no sense.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
488
#474
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: No, these campers should not be allowed in our area at all. Why the hell should people get a free holiday where rate payers pay, we pay for the roads, the services through taxes. Feck off Freedom campers this makes me so angry.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: No toilet, no camp. Goes without saying seriously.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why: Try NO nights.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
489
#474
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why: They shouldnt be there in the first place. We go to our community meet and there are freedom campers there taking up all the car park spaces. Why the hell are they there. like bugger off.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
It is outdated that we even have freedom camping, absolutely NUTS. End it. People camp in camping grounds, there are heaps of them. The concept of Freedom camping is bizzare. People live in these areas, pay rates for the facilities. People can visit but then they leave at the end of the day. good bye. Freedom camping is rediculous outdated idiotic concept. Council needs to end it as does the government.
490
# 474
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Karen Schade
Site Name: Omaha Beach Boat Launching and Wharf
Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 228 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
491
# 474
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Karen Schade
Site Name: Point Wells Foreshore Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 232 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
NO freedom camping. the environment is so small and fragile. Seriously.
492
#477
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: A Jay
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: You need the power to enforce the bylaws.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
493
#477
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: It's the Kiwi way ‐ freedom to camp anywhere in NZ
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
494
#477
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 8am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
495
# 477
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
A Jay
Site Name: Sylvan Park Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 523 Ward: North Shore Local Board:
Devonport‐Takapuna
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Not being used
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
The native bush needs protection along with the open park land. there is the health and safety risk of a fresh water lake.
496
#487
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Peter Clarke
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Controlling freedom camping activity is important. Too many freedom campers are camping in areas where freedom camping is not appropriate.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
497
#487
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: It is good to have more designated freedom camping areas (for as long as the 2011 central goverment law on freedom camping remains operative). However, the places where freedom camping is determined to be allowable needs to be carefully considered.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: We don't want freedom campers pooing and peeing on our land. Simple as that.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why: One night only will ensure the limited freedom camping spots are shared equitably amongst the freedom camping community.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
498
#487
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 8am
Please tell us why: Auckland rate‐payers want to access these spots for their day trips. Freedom campers should move on by 8am every morning.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
499
# 487
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Peter Clarke
Site Name: Buckleton Beach Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 268 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Please see attached submission from the Buckleton Beach Ratepayers and Residents Association
500
#488
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Veronica Clarke
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Need to better control freedom camping
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
501
#488
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Makes sense but need to be careful in determining where freedom camping may occur
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Appropriate ablution activity is a must
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why: One night is enough
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
502
#488
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 8am
Please tell us why: 8am frees up the spots quicker
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
503
#490
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Sam Clarke
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Controlling errant behaviour with fines is an important tool
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
504
#490
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: But the sites need to be carefully considered to ensure they are appropriate
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: People must not poo on our land
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why: One night is enough
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
505
#490
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 8am
Please tell us why: This frees up the car parking spaces earlier in the day
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
506
#494
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Liz Houghton‐brown
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
507
#494
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
508
#494
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
If you allow freedom campers inevitably some will disobey bylaws and rules. As ratepayers we pay for facilities and amenities and these are freeloading off us when they use amenities ‐ they need to book into caravan parks
509
#495
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: janine king
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: I do not support freedom camping in Omaha. There are several camping grounds in close proximity that would love to have the campers there. There are not the facilities or the or management to maintain the facilites in omaha.
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
510
#495
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: No as above. We have protected dotrel birds, and oyster catchers and also recently Kaka and native wood pigeons that need to be protected from pest and unhigenice campers. Also we the permanent residents are not interested in being harassed with parties etc all year round.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why: No as above.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why: Who will monitor this???? Don't want them at all.
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
511
#495
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, other
Please tell us why: Go somewhere else.
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
512
#498
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Heather Walton
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
513
#498
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
514
#498
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Not in Omaha. This is a beautiful place we have all paid a huge amount of money to own homes here. We have special bird sanctuaries and a special marine environment. Because we own here we all take care. Freedom campers are quite disgusting. You will have constant complaints from owners if this is allowed. I can’t believe you would even consider it.
515
#501
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Mark Douglas
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Im for freedom camping but against those that denigrate the venues that they camp at. The ability to fine offenders is certainly a step in the right direction
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
516
#501
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: To me this makes sense to permit camping by self contained vehicles manned by responsible people that look after the areas they are visiting
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Just makes sense
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: Most visitors are only going to stay a day but two is fine. You just don't want people to start living there
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
517
#501
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why: Seems reasonable
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
I applaud the efforts you are going to in putting some rules in place around camping. I believe there are plenty of responsible people that would benefit from visiting Omaha and that not all freedom campers are feral.
518
# 501
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Mark Douglas
Site Name: William Fraser Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (non‐self‐contained permitted)
Site ID: 269 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
No, only allow certified self‐contained vehicles
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
5 ‐ 6
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 2 nights per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
This is my preferred site as its central to everything including a dairy and cafe
519
# 501
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Mark Douglas
Site Name: Omaha Reserve Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 229 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
This is a busy local gathering point and not suitable for camping
520
# 501
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Mark Douglas
Site Name: Omaha Beach Boat Launching and Wharf
Restriction Type:
Prohibited area
Site ID: 228 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Yes, prohibit freedom camping in this area
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
Not applicable
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Not applicable
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
This area is already under a lot of pressure providing parking for boat trailers and is not suitable for camping
521
# 501
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Mark Douglas
Site Name: Rita Way, Excelsior Way, Lagoon Way
Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 257 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
I don't know
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's occasionally full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Again this is needed for overflow parking for boat trailers
522
# 501
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Mark Douglas
Site Name: Pukemateko Reserve Omaha South Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 255 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Yes, allow certified self‐contained vehicles only
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
3 ‐ 4
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
Max 1 night per 4 weeks
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's never full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
I don't know of any special features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
I don't know of any possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
This is probably the second best site
523
#502
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Christabelle Rathe
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
524
#502
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
525
#502
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 10am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
Omaha Beach Surf club needs some freedom camping sites, its a tourist spot and self contained sites would be awesome
526
# 502
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Christabelle Rathe
Site Name: William Fraser Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (non‐self‐contained permitted)
Site ID: 269 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
No response
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
No response
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No response
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
No response
How often is the parking area currently used?
No response
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
No response
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
No response
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Omaha Beach Surf club needs some freedom camping sites, its a tourist spot and self contained sites would be awesome.
527
#504
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: roy hyslop
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Currently the rules are unclear which confuses campers
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
528
#504
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: a limit on numbers & duration per site will improve the visitor experience & help protect the site & local environment.
All should need to be legally self contained
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: A toilet & a handwash facility is a basic requirement
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, allow less than 2 nights
Please tell us why: One night only. 1 night at a location should spread the load, if they require multiple nights campers should book into a campground.
2 nights will stretch to multiple nights unless there is staff to visit each site each day, no enforcement will quickly mean these spaces become unofficial campgrounds or squat spaces.
Which ever time frame is agreed the sites will need to be monitored & visited
Proposal 5
529
#504
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why: I freedom campers were allowed they will occupy space at the expense of other facility users who are generally the ratepayers
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
freedom campers should be required to log their intention on the AC booking system to enable data to be recorded & stay durations etc to be monitored or this will turn into a free for all & local residents, camp ground owners, AC campgrounds will all be worse off.
The rules must be consistent across Auckland.
530
#505
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Margaret Matheson
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
531
#505
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
532
#505
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
533
#509
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Phil Pavis
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
534
#509
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
535
#509
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
536
# 509
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Phil Pavis
Site Name: Buckleton Beach Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 268 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Health & Safety is an issue as the reserve is uneven and there is loose metal, its in regular use in summer and very wet and boggy in winter, its used for playing by children and parking by day visitors and trailers. The Boat ramp is busy and there is little space
537
#511
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Noel Luxford
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
538
#511
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
539
#511
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? No response
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
540
# 511
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Noel Luxford
Site Name: Buckleton Beach Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 268 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, already happening
Do you have any other comments about this area?
Due to the very high use of this parking area it would be unsafe for any camping in this area during the months of December, January and February of any year.
541
#512
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Briton Smith
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: Agree if the real reason for a new bylaw is for enforcement ability (fines).
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
542
#512
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: I am confused: proposal 1 says "Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas...", but proposal 2 says "The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping..."
These 2 statements conflict with each other.
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Other
Please tell us why: Will need to limit the number of vehicles at sights ‐ The issue is we will end up with many over‐sized self‐contained vehicles at small designated locations ‐ ground will get ruined, children will not be safe etc.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
543
#512
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Disagree, it should be 8am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
544
#514
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Jan Wells
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: If the rules are not policed then freedom camping rules will just get ignored
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
545
#514
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why: I think this is important. Csc vehicle users should be used to using their on board toilets so don't need to be near the toilets. The others do.
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why: Suitable length of time
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
546
#514
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why: I think this is late enough
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
547
#518
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
2
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Feedback opens 3 December 2018 and closes 18 February 2019
Your contact details
Your name and feedback will be publicly available in Auckland Council reports and online. All other personal details will remain private.
Name: Nicola Owen
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation? No
Name of organisation:
Your local board: Rodney
Have your say on the proposed Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw
Proposal 1
Replace legacy bylaw provisions about camping in public places with a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 Reason Current bylaw provisions generally ban freedom camping except in designated areas but do not give us the power to issue fines if someone breaks the rules. Developing a new bylaw under the Freedom Camping Act 2011 will allow us to manage freedom camping in Auckland more proactively and give our enforcement officer the power to issue $200 fines.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 2 Increase the number of areas where people can freedom camp in Auckland (with restrictions) to help manage demand and minimise the negative impacts of freedom camping.
Reason The Freedom Camping Act generally allows freedom camping and limits our ability to prohibit it. Our research found a shortage of places where freedom campers can go in Auckland, causing over‐crowding in places where it is allowed, or illegal camping at popular places.
The draft bylaw aims to minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment by providing more places for freedom campers to go, with restrictions on the:
number of camping vehicles that can stay at a designated site
type of vehicle and how long they can stay
548
#518
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 3
Restrict freedom camping to certified self‐contained vehicles only in areas that are not near 24‐hour public toilets.
Reason We want to ensure that all freedom campers have access to a toilet, either onboard their vehicles or at a public toilet that is open 24‐hours. This will minimise the negative impacts from campers on the community and environment.
Note: For a vehicle to camp in a restricted certified self‐contained only area it must meet the NZ Self Containment Standard and display the correct certification.
The standard sets minimum requirements for vehicles including a toilet, fresh water storage, wastewater storage and a rubbish bin.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree
Please tell us why:
Proposal 4
Campers cannot stay in restricted freedom camping areas for more than two nights.
Reason A maximum night stay will:
ensure turnover at restricted freedom camping areas minimise conflict with other users encourage responsible camping.
Our research also found campers typically do not stay at one location for more than two nights.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, max 2 nights
Please tell us why:
Proposal 5
Freedom camping vehicles staying in areas that have high daytime use must leave by 9am.
Reason Some parking areas have overnight parking capacity but have high use during the day. Allowing freedom camping vehicles to remain throughout the day will create conflict with other regular users.
The proposal suggests leaving by 9am to give campers the opportunity to visit local cafes or shops and prepare to leave.
549
#518
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
What is your opinion on this proposal? Agree, with 9am
Please tell us why:
Do you have any other feedback on the draft Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw? For example:
general feedback on the proposal
any council managed areas that are not included in the maps provided, which you think should be included in the bylaw (provide the name and address of the area and why you think it should be included).
Other Feedback:
550
# 518
Freedom Camping in Vehicles Bylaw Site Specific Feedback
Submitter Name:
Nicola Owen
Site Name: Buckleton Beach Reserve Restriction Type:
Restricted area (certified self‐contained only)
Site ID: 268 Ward: Rodney Local Board:
Rodney
Do you agree that freedom camping should be restricted to only certified self‐contained vehicles in this area?
No, prohibit freedom camping in this area
Do you agree that freedom camping in all types of vehicles should be allowed in this area?
Not applicable
Do you agree that all freedom camping should be prohibited in this area?
Not applicable
How many campers do you think would be appropriate in this area at any one time?
0
How long do you think campers should be allowed to stay in this area?
No camping should be allowed
How often is the location currently being used for freedom camping?
Occasionally
How often is the parking area currently used?
It's usually full
Are there any special features in this area which need protecting?
Yes, sensitive environmental features
Are there any health and safety risks for users of this area if freedom camping were to occur?
Yes, possible risks
Do you have any other comments about this area?
The reserved is used by many families including those with young children. Most families walk to the beach. Children often run and ride bikes on the reserve without close supervision as it is know as a safe place to play and residents keep an eye out for each other's children. Allowing freedom campers in this space causes risk of injury to children by having large vehicles with less visibility reversing and driving in this space.
551