fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry volume 357 issue 5 1997 [doi 10.1007%2fs002160050212] g....

Upload: reyhanalmira

Post on 10-Jan-2016

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

chemistry

TRANSCRIPT

  • Abstract A direct measuring method for the determina-tion of 15 inorganic components in wine by ICP-OES wasdeveloped. It was applied to 17 white wines from 6 Ger-man wine-growing regions. In these investigations 15 ele-ments (B, V, Mn, Zn, Fe, Al, Cu, Sr, Ba, Rb, Na, P, Ca,Mg and K) were involved. By using alcoholic calibrationsolutions the results of the direct measuring method arecomparable with those of the control methods. Typicalpatterns of elements obtained by the multicomponentanalyses can be evaluated by multivariate data analysis torecognize the origin of the wines.

    1 Introduction

    Several analytical methods can be used to determine themineral components in wine. In most methods extensivesample preparation is involved. Therefore, these methodsare time-consuming and produce relatively imprecise re-sults.

    The ICP-OES is a multi-element method with verygood detection power and offers the right conditions forreliably and rapidly determining the analytes. Due to thehigh temperature of the plasma less matrix interference isobserved. Therefore the relatively complex organic matrixof the wine should have no real influence on the measure-ments and the analysis of the samples should be possiblewithout pretreatment [1, 2].

    The aim of this study was to develop an analyticalmethod for wine samples and to guarantee the trueness ofthe measured values of the untreated samples. The resultsof standard addition and measurement of decomposedwine samples were compared with results taken from di-

    rect analysis. Accurate and precise analytical results arerequired to make it possible to classify the wine accordingto wine-growing region by means of their typical elementpattern [37].

    2 Experimental

    2.1 Samples

    The investigation included 17 white wines from 6 German wine-growing regions. All information regarding the analysed samplesis summarized in Table 1.

    2.2 Apparatus

    The ICP-spectrometers Maxim I (Fisons Instruments) and Plas-maquant 110 (Carl Zeiss Jena GmbH) were used.

    The Maxim I is equipped with an axially-viewed plasmasource. The instruments optical system comprises an argon-rinsedechelle grating/prism spectrometer in double 0.5 m Czerny-Turnermounting. The available wavelength range is from 174 nm to 800nm. There are 67 lines of 51 elements. The dispersed radiation isfocused onto a mask with 67 exit slits, which are connected with alight-conducting fibre. The Maxim I has 11 thermally stabilizedphotomultipliers. Eight of these are joined with the light-conduct-ing fibres by means of a shutter mechanism. The signals they carryare sequentially registered. Three lines in VUV range are linkedtogether directly with a photomultiplier.

    Unlike the Maxim I the Plasmaquant 110 has a verticallyaligned torch. It too has an echelle spectrometer, whose wave-length-range is from 193 nm to 852 nm. There are 138 lines of 74elements. Each of the 12 photomultipliers can observe 5 of the 138lines through lightconducting fibres linked to the focal plane. Theprinciple employed here allows the analyst to combine spectrallines as required, and the problem of analysis is optimally ad-dressed. The parameters of the analytical program and the wave-lengths used can be found in Tables 2 and 3.

    2.3 Sample preparation

    In order to be able to use aqueous calibration standards the organiccomponents of the wine, in particular the alcohol, must be re-moved from the samples. The wine samples were decomposed ac-cording to the following instructions: 50 mL volume of samplewith 30 mL of perhydrol are evaporated in a Kjeldahl flask for ox-idation of the organic components. 1 mL of conc. sulphuric acid is

    G. Thiel K. Danzer

    Direct analysis of mineral components in wine by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES)

    Fresenius J Anal Chem (1997) 357 :553557 Springer-Verlag 1997

    Received: 30 May 1996 / Revised: 2 July 1996 / Accepted: 5 July 1996

    ORIGINAL PAPER

    Dedicated to Professor Dr. Rolf Borsdorf on the occasion of his 65th birthday

    G. Thiel K. Danzer (Y)Friedrich-Schiller-Universitt Jena, Institut fr Anorganische und Analytische Chemie, Lessingstrasse 8, D-07743 Jena, Germany

  • added to the sample to ensure that the residue does not evaporateto dryness. The remaining residue is mixed with bidistilled waterup to its starting volume. These solutions are analyzed with theICP-OES [8, 9].

    Using the direct measuring method the samples are analyzedwithout any pretreatment. However the calibration standard matrixmust be matched to the samples using ethanol, in order to com-pensate for intensity differences caused by viscosity influences ofthe organic components during sample nebulization. This results instandard solutions of analytes, which contain 12% or in the case ofmineral elements 1.2% ethanol. In both methods the calibrationrange is from 0 to 10 mg/L, for the mineral elements to 50 mg/Land for the more highly concentrated element potassium to 100mg/L.

    The standard addition method involves two standards. The ad-dition of the first standard should double the concentration of theanalytes in the sample and the other should triple it. The requiredconcentration of the standard solutions is estimated with the helpof the results taken from the calibrated methods. The analytes areadded to the samples to be treated in alternating concentrations.After adding the standard solution the original sample and thetreated samples have an equal final volume.

    To determine the mineral elements, the sample solutions mustbe diluted independent of the applied method, in order to workwithin the linear calibration range. To determine the alkali metal

    554

    Table 1 Wine samples Producer/region Grape variety Vintage Abbreviationused

    Winzervereinigung Freyburg/Unstrut e.G. Silvaner 1993 FSRiesling 1993 FRMller-Thurgau 1993 FM

    Weingut Forschungsanstalt Geisenheim Weiburgunder 1993 GWRiesling 1993 GRSilvaner 1993 GS

    Staatliches Weinbauinstitut Freiburg i.Br. Gewrztraminer 1993 BGVersuchs- und Lehrgut Blankenhornsberg Silvaner 1993 BS

    Riesling 1993 BRStaatliches Weinbauinstitut Freiburg i.Br. Riesling 1993 DRVersuchsrebgut Durbach Kerner 1993 DK

    Gewrztraminer 1993 DGChemisches Untersuchungsamt Mainz Mller-Thurgau 1994 NMStaatliche Lehr- und Versuchsanstalt Oppenheim Riesling 1994 NR(Gemarkung Nierstein)Chemisches Untersuchungsamt Mainz Silvaner 1994 OSStaatliche Lehr- und Versuchsanstalt Oppenheim Mller-Thurgau 1994 OM(Gemarkung Oppenheim) Riesling 1994 OR

    Table 2 Operating conditions

    a Only the trace elements ofdecomposition solutions weremeasured using 1 s integrationtimeb Variable parameter depend-ing on line-type

    Parameter Maxim I Plasmaquant 110

    Delay time 30 s transport time of sample 30 s transport time of sample10 s pre-integration time for signal 30 s stabilization time after powerstabilization regulation

    Off-peak integration 1 3On-peak integration 3 3Integration time 3 s 3 saCoolant gas flow 13 L/min 12 L/minAuxiliary gas flow 1.2 L/min 1 L/minCarrier gas flow 0.48 L/min 200 kPaPower 1250 W 670 W bis 1210 WbPump speed 3 mL/min 1.6 mL/minNebulizer Meinhard nebulizer Cross-Flow nebulizer

    Table 3 Analytes and wavelengths

    Analyte Wavelength (nm)

    Boron 249.6Vanadium 292.4, 309.3a, 310.2bManganese 257.6Zinc 206.2, 213.8Iron 259.9Aluminium 308.2, 396.1Copper 324.7Strontium 407.7a, 430.5bBarium 233.5, 455.3a, 493.4bRubidium 780.0Sodium 589.0Calcium 317.9Magnesium 279.0Phosphorus 214.9Potassium 766.4

    a Only on Maxim Ib Only on Plasmaquant 110

  • contents, lanthanum is used as an ionization buffer. This step wasnecessary, because only arc lines can be used for determining theseelements. Their sensitivity at the high temperatures observed inplasma is relatively low; the alkali elements are strongly inclinedto ionization. Therefore the ICP-OES is not the best method for de-termining these elements.

    When the wine is decomposed, orthoboric acid is lost. In orderto examine the measured values using the direct method, another in-dependent method must therefore be applied. A sensitive analyticalmethod already employed in the analysis of wine is the spectropho-tometric determination of orthoboric acid by chelate extraction with2-ethyl-1,3-hexanediol, and by using protonated curcumin [1012].In an acidic environment the orthoboric acid with curcumin forms ared substance, whose extinction is measured at 555 nm.

    3 Results and discussion

    3.1 Interpretation of the results

    The ICP-OES was employed to determine 15 elements(B, V, Mn, Zn, Fe, Al, Cu, Sr, Ba, Rb, Na, P, Ca, Mgand K) in wine. The results for 17 wines are summa-rized in Table 4. Ten measurements were ascertainedfor the different methods. The minimum and maximumvalues have been given. In Figs. 1 to 3 the results for the

    555T

    able

    4A

    naly

    tical

    resu

    lts (m

    inimu

    m an

    d max

    imum

    value

    in m

    g/L)

    Win

    eB

    VM

    nZn

    FeA

    lC

    uSr

    Ba

    Rb

    Na

    PC

    aM

    gK

    FS2.

    02.

    8n

    .n.

    0.9

    1.2

    0.3

    0.5

    1.4

    1.9

    1.1

    1.8

    0.17

    0.2

    40.

    961

    .28

    0.06

    0.0

    91.

    41.

    610

    13

    29

    3611

    913

    762

    78

    820

    860

    FR2.

    83.

    4n

    .n.

    0.8

    1.0

    0.7

    0.9

    2.3

    3.0

    1.0

    1.5

    0.06

    0.1

    00.

    550

    .74

    0.04

    0.0

    71.

    110

    15

    62

    8075

    93

    67

    8754

    073

    0FM

    2.9

    3.2

    n.n

    .0.

    80.

    90.

    91.

    12.

    32.

    50.

    60.

    90.

    160

    .20

    0.57

    0.6

    80.

    030

    .05

    1.2

    69

    59

    7775

    98

    57

    7678

    087

    0G

    W3.

    64.

    00.

    030.

    91.

    10.

    70.

    81.

    51.

    91.

    42.

    20.

    060.

    380

    .48

    0.11

    0.1

    81.

    614

    19

    75

    9392

    112

    68

    8983

    090

    0G

    R2.

    73.

    1n

    .n.

    0.6

    0.8

    0.7

    0.9

    1.2

    1.5

    1.2

    1.7

    0.02

    0.0

    30.

    340

    .45

    0.08

    0.1

    11.

    110

    12

    59

    7568

    87

    70

    9259

    074

    0G

    S2.

    32.

    5n

    .n.

    0.5

    0.7

    0.5

    0.6

    1.2

    1.7

    1.3

    2.1

    0.03

    0.0

    50.

    190

    .30

    0.07

    0.1

    11.

    111

    13

    58

    7065

    75

    60

    7366

    071

    0B

    G6.

    06.

    80.

    060

    .07

    0.8

    1.1

    0.7

    0.9

    0.9

    1.3

    1.5

    2.5

    0.10

    0.1

    60.

    210

    .33

    0.10

    0.2

    31.

    511

    13

    119

    145

    67

    8556

    72

    910

    1090

    BS

    2.6

    3.1

    0.06

    0.1

    40.

    91.

    10.

    70.

    91.

    11.

    41.

    42.

    10.

    110

    .18

    0.17

    0.3

    10.

    080

    .18

    1.5

    2.6

    101

    257

    72

    60

    7162

    78

    590

    790

    BR

    3.2

    4.4

    0.04

    0.1

    10.

    60.

    80.

    91.

    20.

    50.

    60.

    81.

    20.

    060

    .11

    0.28

    0.4

    40.

    080

    .14

    1.8

    2.9

    79

    76

    9274

    91

    62

    7949

    065

    0D

    R3.

    44.

    30.

    061.

    21.

    51.

    01.

    20.

    50.

    61.

    52.

    40.

    300

    .46

    0.24

    0.3

    80.

    150

    .26

    1.8

    89

    252

    286

    162

    200

    821

    0494

    011

    10D

    K3.

    44.

    10.

    031.

    11.

    30.

    91.

    20.

    50.

    71.

    01.

    50.

    500

    .71

    0.12

    0.1

    90.

    100

    .18

    1.0

    810

    155

    174

    58

    8164

    81

    840

    970

    DG

    3.5

    4.7

    0.05

    0.0

    70.

    81.

    10.

    81.

    10.

    40.

    61.

    93.

    00.

    400

    .63

    0.15

    0.2

    60.

    120

    .31

    1.3

    111

    426

    129

    061

    74

    68

    8215

    901

    860

    NM

    4.3

    4.5

    n.n

    .0.

    81.

    00.

    40.

    51.

    01.

    51.

    11.

    70.

    050

    .09

    0.20

    0.3

    40.

    070

    .11

    1.2

    89

    961

    0293

    108

    63

    7684

    092

    0N

    R3.

    94.

    50.

    010.

    81.

    11.

    21.

    52.

    53.

    11.

    82.

    50.

    200

    .32

    0.46

    0.5

    90.

    070

    .10

    1.4

    182

    587

    112

    104

    128

    831

    0551

    061

    0O

    S3.

    94.

    50.

    021.

    01.

    20.

    91.

    22.

    12.

    41.

    92.

    60.

    360

    .50

    0.44

    0.5

    60.

    080

    .11

    1.4

    111

    471

    88

    102

    135

    69

    8886

    010

    20O

    M3.

    84.

    50.

    020.

    91.

    11.

    01.

    23.

    54.

    22.

    53.

    40.

    050

    .10

    0.48

    0.6

    10.

    090

    .15

    1.0

    121

    593

    111

    77

    9372

    89

    690

    800

    OR

    4.9

    5.8

    0.01

    1.0

    1.2

    0.9

    1.2

    1.7

    2.2

    1.3

    1.9

    0.04

    0.1

    10.

    320

    .43

    0.05

    0.0

    91.

    210

    13

    56

    6884

    105

    67

    8748

    065

    0

    Fig.1 Comparison of the results of the applied methods for boron; spectrophotometric method, directly measured on Plas-

    maquant 110, directly measured on Maxim I, standard ad-dition method on Plasmaquant 110

    Fig.2 Comparison of the results of the applied methods for phos-phorus; measured after decomposition on Plasmaquant 110,

    measured after decomposition on Maxim I, directly mea-sured on Plasmaquant 110, directly measured on Maxim I,

    standard addition method on Plasmaquant 110

    Boron

    Phosphorus

    Samples

    Samples

  • elements boron, phosphorus and potassium are givengraphically as examples. They have been selected tocover all magnitudes of the evaluated contents. Measur-ing the decomposed wines provides a wide variabilityand altogether lower values caused by losses during ox-idation and evaporation in the Kjeldahl flask, viscosityinfluences by the sulphuric acid during nebulization andcontamination by the instruments and chemicals. Theseeffects have also been observed in other investigations[13]. When using the direct method, apparent differ-ences in intensity, caused by the influence of the or-ganic components in the sample nebulization and mea-surement process, could be compensated by addingethanol, the main organic component of wine, to thecalibration standards.

    In some cases, especially when measuring trace ele-ments with contents below 10 mg/L, the standard additionmethod provides noticeably higher values than the othermethods. However, previous investigations gave no clear

    information about the reasons for this observation orwhether these results are reliable. The analysis resultswere evaluated by investigating whether the methods usedachieved the same results within the scope of measure-ment accuracy. One way of displaying the relation be-tween the results of the methods employed is linear re-gression. The mathematical equation corresponding to thebias function y = b x + a can be compared with the idealfunction y = x. In this way systematic errors can be rec-ognized by calculating the confidence interval of the re-gression coefficients a and b.

    Table 5 shows the regression coefficients a and b aswell as their confidence intervals as results of the compar-isons between direct measurement values and those of thedecomposed samples and between direct and standard ad-dition measurement values. It can be seen from this tablethat there are significant differences in the results of themethods compared first for 11 analytical lines. Comparingthe direct measurement values with results of standard ad-dition there are even significant differences for 14 analyt-ical lines. Particularly great differences were observed, inthe first case for barium, and in the second for copper.These elements appear in very low quantities in all winesso that the resulting errors in measurement cause such dis-crepancies. Furthermore, the evaluation of measurementsof alkali elements gives unsatisfactory results. As alreadystated, the ICP-OES is fairly unsuitable to determine theseanalytes, because the high temperature of the plasma re-duces the sensitivity of the arc lines for these easily ion-ized elements.

    With some elements the differences, although signifi-cant, can be considered less so. In a concentration of 1 mg/Land lower, the differences are tolerable from roughly 15%. Furthermore, the direct method is applicable, be-cause its results occur mainly between those of the com-parative methods. Therefore the significant differencescould also be traced back to systematic errors in the com-parative methods.

    556

    Fig.3 Comparison of the results of the applied methods for potas-sium; measured after decomposition on Plasmaquant 110,

    measured after decomposition on Maxim I, directly mea-sured on Plasmaquant 110, directly measured on Maxim I,

    standard addition method on Plasmaquant 110

    Table 5 Validation of the di-rect method by means of re-gression coefficients

    b(D;A) a(D;A) b(D;S) a(D;S)

    B 0.963 0.106 0.152 0.427 0.993 0.053 0.255 0.264V 0.930 0.428 0.056 0.050 1.141 0.074 0.008 0.007Mn 0.872 0.075 0.033 0.072 0.996 0.080 0.134 0.077Zn 206 1.024 0.053 0.039 0.045 1.184 0.051 0.012 0.043Zn 213 0.947 0.063 0.020 0.045 1.166 0.049 0.003 0.043Fe 0.943 0.031 0.089 0.057 1.099 0.031 0.034 0.056Al 308 0.897 0.051 0.003 0.082 1.238 0.130 0.115 0.211Al 396 0.868 0.051 0.047 0.092 1.143 0.075 0.107 0.135Cu 0.890 0.278 0.022 0.007 1.286 0.047 0.024 0.012Sr 0.913 0.047 0.030 0.023 1.394 0.105 0.191 0.052Ba 0.421 0.082 0.024 0.012 1.158 0.038 0.009 0.006Rb 0.780 0.113 0.645 0.127 1.035 0.392 0.096 0.439Na 0.536 0.055 6.115 0.683 0.450 0.068 5.654 0.846P 0.972 0.028 11.766 3.107 0.881 0.016 5.688 2.224Ca 0.771 0.043 6.512 4.664 0.858 0.043 11.058 4.711Mg 0.775 0.082 3.775 6.908 0.874 0.097 7.630 8.213K 1.192 0.076 147.349 64.942 0.759 0.070 220.259 59.915

    Potassium

    Samples

  • 3.2 Evaluation and interpretation of the results by multivariate statistics

    In this study a methodical basis is established to investi-gate the wines, which by means of their element patternscould give information as to their origins. The evaluationof the results by multivariate data analysis provided initialindications as to the distinction of origin. To achieve this,pattern recognition methods such as discriminant analysiswere used. To differentiate between the wines from the 6different wine-growing regions, up to 5 discriminant func-tions can be calculated. The two with the greatest dis-crimination power have been used in Fig. 4. The winesfrom Durbach are proven to differ significantly from therest. The wines from the Saale-Unstrut region and fromBlankenhornsberg are also clearly distinguishable. Thesamples from Geisenheim, Nierstein and Oppenheimwere not fully separated by these two discriminant func-tions. Phosphorus, iron, strontium and copper are the mostefficient elements in group separation. These results,however, should only be considered preliminary. Due tothe small data set available, they are not fully representa-tive. Moreover, the discrepancies with enological findingsshow that it is not clear from the size of this data set,whether the elements considered significant by the classi-fication methods give indications of the structure of thepopulation, that is to say of the whole region of origin, oronly of the random samples taken. It follows then that intaking a greater number of wine samples one can discoverwhich element contents are reproducibly influenced bythe wine growing and the wine making process and whichare not influenced at all. This knowledge would make itpossible to judge more effectively the origins of the wines.This point will be investigated further.

    4 Conclusion

    The investigation undertaken has shown that direct analy-sis of mineral and trace elements in wine using ICP-OESis possible in spite of some problems. This is proven par-ticularly by the short time necessary for sample pretreat-ment and the high level of measurement precision. Onerequirement, however, is that calibration be achieved withstandard solutions containing ethanol. By doing this, in-tensity differences caused by viscosity influence of the or-ganic components during sample nebulization can becompensated. In some cases it is possible to explain sys-tematic differences between the direct method under eval-uation and the established reference methods. The appli-cability of the direct method becomes clear in that the re-sults achieved in this way are mostly between those of thecomparative methods.

    Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Prof. Dr. H.Eschnauer for his assistance in obtaining the samples. We espe-cially thank Winzervereinigung Freyburg/Unstrut e.G., For-schungsanstalt Geisenheim, Staatliches Weinbauinstitut Freiburg i.Br., and Chemisches Untersuchungsamt Mainz, who supported ourwork by supplying the wine samples. We are also grateful to Dr.C.-J. Ntzold, Dr. V. Jngel and K. Weniger from the firm CarlZeiss Jena GmbH for making it possible for us to use the ICP-spectrometer Plasmaquant 110.

    References

    1. Interesse F-S, Lamparelli F, Alloggio V (1984) Z Lebensm Un-ters Forsch 178 :272278

    2. Interesse F-S, DAvella G, Alloggio V, Lamparelli F (1985) ZLebensm Unters Forsch 181 :470474

    3. Siegmund H, Bchmann K (1977) Lebensm Unters Forsch 164 :17

    4. Siegmund H, Bchmann K (1978) Lebensm Unters Forsch 166 :298303

    5. Jakob L, Eschnauer H (1990) Offprint from Deutsches Wein-bau-Jahrbuch 41 :215222

    6.Borszeki J, Koltay L, Inczedy J, Gegus E (1983) Z LebensmUnters Forsch 177 :1518

    7. Larrechi M-S, Rius F-X (1987) Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 185 :181184

    8.Eschnauer H, Jakob L, Meierer H, Neeb R (1989) MikrochimActa [Wien] III : 291298

    9.Eschnauer H, Meierer H, Neeb R (1985) In: Sansoni B (ed) In-strumentelle Multielementanalyse. VCH, Weinheim

    10.Koch OG, Koch-Dedic GA (1964) Handbuch der Spuren-analyse. Springer, Berlin Gttingen Heidelberg

    11.Fukui S et al. (1983) Eisei Kagaku 29(5) :323328; cited fromChem Abstr 1984 :50107

    12.Mair JW, Day HG (1972) Anal Chem 44(12) :2015201713.Heil M (1995) Dissertation, Neustadt/Weinstrasse Kaisers-

    lautern

    557

    Fig. 4 Representation of wine groups in the discriminant plane; pFreyburg/Unstrut, k Geisenheim, -- Blankenhornsberg, G Durbach,M Nierstein, + Oppenheim