frisca sumabat vs. candido sumabat (defendants pre-trial brief 1-17-10)

Upload: dael-gerong

Post on 01-Mar-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/26/2019 Frisca Sumabat vs. Candido Sumabat (Defendants Pre-trial Brief 1-17-10)

    1/5

    Republic of the Philippines

    MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES

    8thJudicial Region

    Maasin City, Southern Leyte

    -o0o-

    SPS. !S"C#$ % Ci&il Case !o. R-'()0*R#SC S+M" *$R

    Plaintiffs D A M A G E S

    - &ersus -

    C!#$ S+M" JR., R/!$L

    S+M" and SL1C#$! #M#,

    efendants.

    2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2

    DEFENDANTS PRE-TRIAL BRIEF

    COME NOW, defendants through counsel in the abo&e-

    entitled case, in co3pliance 4ith the order of this

    5onorable Court 3ost respectfully sub3it the herein

    defendants pre-trial brief and hereby postulates

    A. BRIEF STATEMENT OF THEIR DEFENSE:

    "his is an action for da3ages filed by plaintiffs

    against defendants upon an in6ury to the rights of

    plaintiffs. "he prayer in co3plaint as7 for Php00,000.00

    for 3oral da3ages and another Php00,000.00 for e9e3plary

    da3ages. efendants defense is that plaintiffs action hasprescribed pursuant to rticle :( of the !e4 Ci&il Code

    4hich states ;an action upon an in6ury to the rights of

    plaintiffs shall be instituted 4ithin *our .

    +nfortunately, plaintiffs right of action co33enced fro3 the

    ti3e the property 4as issued a sheriffs Certificate of Sale

    in fa&or of e&elop3ent an7 of the Philippines dated March

    ), ))0. 5ence, the period of prescription has set in

    irretrie&ably.

    B. STATEMENT OF THEIR WILLINGNESS TO ENTER INTO AN

    AMICABLE SETTLEMENT OR FOR ARBITRATION

    efendants are 4illing to enter into an a3icable

  • 7/26/2019 Frisca Sumabat vs. Candido Sumabat (Defendants Pre-trial Brief 1-17-10)

    2/5

    DEFENDANTS PRE-TRIAL BRIEF

    Page 2

    settle3ent 4ith plaintiffs under such ter3s and conditions

    that are fair, e?uitable and reasonable under the pre&ailing

    circu3stances.

    C. STIPULATION OF FACTS:

    . "hat defendants Sal&acion #3ai and Reynold Su3abat

    are the children of Candido Su3abat Jr. and "rinidad

    Roderos.

    '. "hat defendant@s Candido Su3abat Jr. ad3itted to

    ha&e entered a 3ortgage 6ointly 4ith his parents Candido

    Su3abat Sr. and #sabel "olibas an gri-loan 4ith the

    e&elop3ent an7 of the Philippines

  • 7/26/2019 Frisca Sumabat vs. Candido Sumabat (Defendants Pre-trial Brief 1-17-10)

    3/5

    DEFENDANTS PRE-TRIAL BRIEF

    Page 3

    b. Real /state Mortgage dated January '),

    )).

    c. "ransfer Certificate of "itle !o. "-8():.

    d. efendants reser&ed other e9hibits as the

    need 3ay arise during the hearing of the

    case.

    F. MANIFESTATION OF NON AVAILMENT TO ANY DISCOVERY

    PROCEDURE:

    efendants respectfully 3anifest no necessity of

    a&ailing any 3odes of disco&ery procedure.

    G. NUMBERS OF WITNESSES:

    efendants ha&e *our

  • 7/26/2019 Frisca Sumabat vs. Candido Sumabat (Defendants Pre-trial Brief 1-17-10)

    4/5

    Page 4

    Copy furnished

    ATTY. ERWIN A. PEDROSA

    Counsel for Plaintiffs

    Public ttorney@s $ffice

    ul4agan ng Eatarungan

    Maasin City

    y personal deli&ery . . .

  • 7/26/2019 Frisca Sumabat vs. Candido Sumabat (Defendants Pre-trial Brief 1-17-10)

    5/5