from data to decisions – using actuarial science in the ... · pdf filefrom data to...

21
From Data to Decisions – Using actuarial science in the fight against poverty This presentation has been prepared for the Actuaries Institute 2015 ASTIN and AFIR/ERM Colloquium. The Institute Council wishes it to be understood that opinions put forward herein are not necessarily those of the Institute and the Council is not responsible for those opinions.

Upload: buithu

Post on 09-Mar-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

From Data to Decisions – Using actuarial science in the fight against

poverty

This presentation has been prepared for the Actuaries Institute 2015 ASTIN and AFIR/ERM Colloquium.

The Institute Council wishes it to be understood that opinions put forward herein are not necessarily those of the Institute and the

Council is not responsible for those opinions.

1. Financial losses from natural disasters continue to rise, with low-income populations feeling the greatest effects.

2. Disaster risk financing (DRF) is integral to the solution

3. Actuarial analysis is a critical input in DRF decisions:

i. The design of a scalable social protection program ii. The design of a sovereign disaster risk financing

strategy

Natural disasters continue to rise in frequency and severity across the world

Yet, there is a major gap between economic losses and insured losses especially in low-

income countries

1. Financial losses from natural disasters continue to rise, with low-income populations feeling the greatest effects.

2. Disaster risk financing (DRF) is integral to the solution

3. Actuarial analysis is a critical input in DRF decisions:

i. The design of a scalable social protection program ii. The design of a sovereign disaster risk financing

strategy

Risk Financing is integral to Disaster Risk Management

Pillar 2: Risk Reduction

Pillar 3: Preparedness

Pillar 4: Risk Financing

Pillar 5: Resilient Recovery

Pillar 1: Risk Identification Improved identification and understanding of disaster risks through building capacity for

assessments and analysis

Avoided creation of new risks and reduced risks in society through greater disaster risk

consideration in policy and investment

Improved capacity to manage crises through developing forecasting and disaster

management capacities

Increased financial resilience of governments, private sector and households

through financial protection strategies

Quicker, more resilient recovery through support for reconstruction planning

1. Financial losses from natural disasters continue to rise, with low-income populations feeling the greatest effects.

2. Disaster risk financing (DRF) is integral to the solution

3. Actuarial analysis is a critical input in DRF decisions:

i. The design of a scalable social protection program ii. The design of a sovereign disaster risk financing

strategy

Actuarial analysis bridges the gap between risk data and evidence based

decision making

1. Financial losses from natural disasters continue to rise, with low-income populations feeling the greatest effects.

2. Disaster risk financing (DRF) is integral to the solution

3. Actuarial analysis is a critical input in DRF decisions:

i. The design of a scalable social protection program ii. The design of a sovereign disaster risk financing

strategy

Kenya’s Hunger Safety Nets Program

• HSNP is a social protection program in 4 northern counties in Kenya

• Provides regular cash transfers to the poorest households c. 90,000

• Designed with the intention of being able to scale up in times of drought

• Registration of households • Bank accounts activated

Excel model developed to estimate financial costs of scaling up the safety net, addressing key questions:

Which counties should be covered by HSNP Scalability?

What frequency or severity of events should trigger a payout?

How should the payout structure be designed?

What proportion of the population should receive payouts during

drought events?

What is the overall structure and estimated costs of the selected

scalability program?

1

2

3

4

5

Should the whole Northern region be protected or just specific counties?

How bad does the VCI need to be to trigger a payout?

Should payouts vary with scale of event and should all households receive the same payout?

Which households are vulnerable to different drought severity levels?

Is the Scalability Program affordable?

The scalability tool: Inputs and estimated scalability costs

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Extreme Payout 0.6 1.1 0.4 0.0 2.8 22.6 0.0 0.7 6.6 1.5 27.8 0.4 2.2 0.5Severe Payout 3.6 8.2 5.9 9.1 7.9 9.8 0.2 8.4 17.9 4.3 13.7 0.9 3.3 5.9Average Annual Payout 12.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.012.0

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

USD

Mill

ions

Annual Scalability Cost (total across all 4 HSNP counties)

1. Financial losses from natural disasters continue to rise, with low-income populations feeling the greatest effects.

2. Disaster risk financing (DRF) is integral to the solution

3. Actuarial analysis is a critical input in DRF decisions:

i. The design of a scalable social protection program ii. The design of a sovereign disaster risk financing

strategy

How can governments develop strategies to secure timely and sufficient

financing?

Instruments Available: • Ex-post credit • Insurance • Emergency Budget

Reallocation • Contingent Credit • Reserve Funds

CBA tool: quantifies the financial costs of different sovereign risk financing strategies

Ex-post credit Insurance Emergency Budget Reallocation

A middle income country: • large diversified

economy • high recurrent risk of

earthquakes and tropical cyclones

• very high borrowing capacity

• no delays or increased cost of borrowing in the capital market (even post disasters)

Contingent Credit Reserve Funds

Cost savings relative to the existing risk financing strategy

21

53 53 53

6

-9 -9

16

109

-3

12

44

69

162

3

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

1 in 5 year 1 in 10 year 1 in 30 year 1 in 50 year Average

Cos

t Sav

ings

in U

SD m

illio

ns

Strategy A (inclusion of concessionary contingent credit)

Strategy B (inclusion of insurance attaching at a 1 in 25 year loss)

Strategy C (inclusion of both concessionary contingent credit and insurance)

Actuarial science in the fight against poverty

• The high and rising economic and fiscal costs of disasters often reverse development gains and exacerbate poverty

• Disaster Risk Finance is integral to increasing the financial resilience of governments, private sector and households against the impact of natural hazards

• Actuarial science is a critical input in public policy decisions for financial protection

Contacts

Olivier Mahul Program Manager, Disaster Risk Finance and Insurance Program [email protected] Barry Maher Disaster Risk Financing Specialist, Disaster Risk Finance and Insurance Program [email protected]

Disaster Risk Financing Instruments

Risk Transfer

Risk Retention

Catastrophe bonds Insurance-

linked Securities

MultiCat program Capital-at-Risk program

Caribbean & Pacific

Insurance Pools

Regional facilities pooling risks to cover against natural disasters in 16 Caribbean countries and 5 Pacific countries

Cat DDO Contingent Loans

Provides immediate liquidity following a natural disaster

Natural Disaster

Derivatives

Prob

abili

ty o

f Eve

nt

Seve

rity

of Im

pact

Major Low

Insures against weather or geologic losses, based on an index

·

The scalability tool: Risk financing inputs and outputs

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Cost after insurance exhausted 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0Insurance payout 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.8 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 26.1 0.0 0.0 0.0Cost before insurance begins to pay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paid by Reserve Fund 4.3 9.3 6.3 9.1 10.0 10.0 0.2 9.1 10.0 5.9 10.0 1.3 5.5 6.4Attachment Point 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0Exhaustion Point 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

USD

Mill

ions

Funding of Annual Scalability Costs