from fingers to blobs: late nonlinear stage of...

18
From Fingers to Blobs: Late Nonlinear Stage of Interchange Preliminary Studies Ping Zhu, C. R. Sovinec, and C. C. Hegna University of Wisconsin-Madison NIMROD Spring Meeting Annapolis, MD April 21, 2007

Upload: others

Post on 19-Mar-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • From Fingers to Blobs: Late

    Nonlinear Stage of Interchange

    Preliminary Studies

    Ping Zhu, C. R. Sovinec, and C. C. HegnaUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison

    NIMROD Spring MeetingAnnapolis, MD

    April 21, 2007

  • Blob Formation from Nonliear

    Interchange in MHD

    NIMROD Spring Meeting MHD Modelings of Blob Formation – 2 / 18

    1. Problem

    ■ (How) Do ELM filaments develop into blobs?

    ◆ Late nonlinear ELMs develop prominent filaments (“fingers”)(MAST, NIMROD/M3D ELM milestone studies, etc)

    ◆ Under what conditions, do those filaments break into blobs?

    ◆ Are current extended MHD codes capable of simulating such aprocess?

    ■ Late nonlinear stage of ballooning/peeling.

    ■ Prototype problem: interchange (g-mode) in a 2D slab

    2. Approaches

    ■ Reduced MHD modeling: Aydemir, Krasheninnikov, et al.

    ■ Direct/Full/Extended MHD modeling: NIMROD

  • Model Equations: Reduced and Full MHD

    NIMROD Spring Meeting MHD Modelings of Blob Formation – 3 / 18

    ■ Reduced MHD model has been used for (2D slab) scrape-off layer (SOL)[Aydemir, Phys. Plasmas 12, 062503 (2005) and Refs. therein]:

    ∂tU + [φ,U ] =2ρsqR

    φ −2ρsR

    [x, lnn] + µ∇2⊥U, (1)

    ∂tn + [φ, n] = −2ρsqR

    n + D∇2⊥n, (2)

    where U = ∇2φ, [φ,U ] = ẑ · ∇⊥φ ×∇⊥U , ρs =√

    Temi

    /Ωi.

    ■ Full MHD model used in NIMROD for (2D slab) pedestal in this study:

    ∂tn + u · ∇n = −n∇ · u + D∇2n, (3)

    ρ(∂tu + u · ∇u) = J× B−∇p + ρg + µ∇(·ρw), (4)

    · · · · · · ,

    where w = ∇u + (∇u)T − 23I∇ · u, µ is the isotropic viscosity.

  • Linear Dispersion from Reduced Model

    NIMROD Spring Meeting MHD Modelings of Blob Formation – 4 / 18

    ■ Local dispersion showing linear effects of dissipation [Aydemir, 2005].

    ■ Similar dispersion and effects of dissipation obtained from NIMRODsimulations will be shown later.

  • Blob Formation in Reduced Model

    NIMROD Spring Meeting MHD Modelings of Blob Formation – 5 / 18

    ■ Blob formation due to interchange instability [Aydemir, 2005].

    ■ Will compare with NIMROD simulations of blob formation due tointerchange in rest of this talk.

  • Hypertangentially Shaped Pedestal

    NIMROD Spring Meeting MHD Modelings of Blob Formation – 6 / 18

    -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60R

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    pres

    ure

    Lρ=5, ∆p=8

    -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60R

    0

    0.005

    0.01

    0.015

    B

    Lρ=5, B(-64)=10-4

    ■ 2D simulation in (R,Z) plane; no variations in φ (purely interchange).

    ■ 1D equilibrium (R): g = gR̂, B = B(R)φ̂; perturbation propagates in Z(periodic B.C.), advects in R (conducting wall B.C.).

    ■ Density ρ(R) = ρh tanh[

    −R−R0Lρ

    ]

    + ρc; pressure p = ργ

  • Linear Properties: Effects of Dissipations

    NIMROD Spring Meeting MHD Modelings of Blob Formation – 7 / 18

    0.01 0.1 1kZ/2π

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    2*(li

    near

    gro

    wth

    )

    D=µ=0D=µ=0.014

    ■ Linear growth from simulation Γ ∼ 0.26081/2 = 0.13041s−1

    ■ Marginal interchange instability growth Γmax ∼√

    gLρ

    + g2

    u2A+c2s

    = 0.14

    ■ D = µ = 0.014 used for blob simulations shown here.

  • Sinusoidal Initial Perturbation in Tanh

    Shaped Pedestal

    NIMROD Spring Meeting MHD Modelings of Blob Formation – 8 / 18

    ■ The wavenumber at peak linear growth point kZ = 0.2π is used forinitial velocity perturbation uR|t=0 ∼ sin (kZZ).

    ■ Discrete structures appear as filaments extends radially.

  • Localized Outward Initial Perturbation in

    Tanh Shaped Pedestal

    NIMROD Spring Meeting MHD Modelings of Blob Formation – 9 / 18

    ■ uR|t=0 = u0e−

    R−R1∆R

    ”2

    Z−Z1∆Z

    ”2

    , where u0 = 0.001 (outward flow).

    ■ Isolated blob/bubble form out of filament cap in late stage.

  • Localized Inward Initial Perturbation in

    Tanh Shaped Pedestal

    NIMROD Spring Meeting MHD Modelings of Blob Formation – 10 / 18

    ■ Localized Guassian initial perturbation, but with u0 = −0.001 flowinginward.

    ■ Transient behavior different from outward case; blob eventually forms.

  • Localized Inward Initial Perturbation in

    Tanh Shaped Pedestal (Animation)

    NIMROD Spring Meeting MHD Modelings of Blob Formation – 11 / 18

    Animation: The Creation and Motion of a Blob (5 secs)

    pressure.aviMedia File (video/avi)

  • Exponentially Shaped Pedestal

    NIMROD Spring Meeting MHD Modelings of Blob Formation – 12 / 18

    -40 -20 0 20 40R

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    pres

    ure

    Lρ=5, p(R0)=9, p(infty)=1

    -40 -20 0 20 40R

    0.01

    0.0105

    0.011

    0.0115

    0.012

    0.0125

    B

    Lρ=5, B(R0)=0.01

    ■ 1D equilibrium variation and g vector in R direction, B vector in φdirection, perturbation propagates in Z direction.

    ■ Density ρ(R) = ρ0e−

    R−R0Lρ + ρ∞; pressure p = ρ

    γ

    ■ Less symmetric in R direction; used earlier by Aydemir (2005) for SOL.

  • Sinusoidal Initial Perturbation in

    Exponentially Shaped Pedestal

    NIMROD Spring Meeting MHD Modelings of Blob Formation – 13 / 18

    ■ uR|t=0 ∼ sin (kZZ), where kZ = 0.2π.

    ■ Final blob structures are more detached from the base than inhypertangential shaped pedestal case (less symmetric in R).

  • Localized Outward Initial Perturbation in

    Exponentially Shaped Pedestal

    NIMROD Spring Meeting MHD Modelings of Blob Formation – 14 / 18

    ■ Unlike Aydemir’s results, single/isolated blob forms and more localizedin Z (poloidal) direction.

    ■ Notice the secondary blob formation trailing the major blob.

  • Localized Inward Initial Perturbation in

    Exponentially Shaped Pedestal

    NIMROD Spring Meeting MHD Modelings of Blob Formation – 15 / 18

    ■ Similar to tanh shaped pedestal case, blob formation slower than inoutward initial flow case.

    ■ Notice the shredding-off of small blobs from major traveling blob.

  • Dissipation Effects on Late Nonlinear

    Interchange

    NIMROD Spring Meeting MHD Modelings of Blob Formation – 16 / 18

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140time

    1e-06

    0.0001

    0.01

    1

    100

    10000

    kine

    tic e

    nerg

    y

    D=µ=0.0014D=µ=0.014

    ■ Lower dissipation case terminates before entering late nonlinear phase;optimal numerical settings are yet to be found to carry the simulationfurther.

    ■ Previous studies suggest it is more difficult for blobs to maintaincoherent structure with low dissipation.

  • Summary

    NIMROD Spring Meeting MHD Modelings of Blob Formation – 17 / 18

    ■ Blob formation in late nonlinear stage of interchange has beendemonstrated in NIMROD simulations.

    ■ Dissipation mechanism appear to control the geometry and dynamics ofblob formation and transport.

    ■ Future work:

    ◆ Realistic parameter regime.

    ◆ 2-fluid, extend MHD version of NIMROD.

    ◆ Ballooning instability toroial geometry.

  • Acknowledgment

    NIMROD Spring Meeting MHD Modelings of Blob Formation – 18 / 18

    Special thanks to

    ■ Chris Carey, for help making animation;

    ■ Tony Hammond, for providing linux system support;

    ■ Jean Carlo Perez, for help using powerdot;

    ■ Curt Bolton, for suggesting this study during last APS.

    Blob Formation from Nonliear Interchange in MHDModel Equations: Reduced and Full MHDLinear Dispersion from Reduced ModelBlob Formation in Reduced ModelHypertangentially Shaped PedestalLinear Properties: Effects of DissipationsSinusoidal Initial Perturbation in Tanh Shaped PedestalLocalized Outward Initial Perturbation in Tanh Shaped PedestalLocalized Inward Initial Perturbation in Tanh Shaped PedestalLocalized Inward Initial Perturbation in Tanh Shaped Pedestal (Animation)Exponentially Shaped PedestalSinusoidal Initial Perturbation in Exponentially Shaped PedestalLocalized Outward Initial Perturbation in Exponentially Shaped PedestalLocalized Inward Initial Perturbation in Exponentially Shaped PedestalDissipation Effects on Late Nonlinear InterchangeSummaryAcknowledgment