from forest to faucet: priority for healthy watersheds by albert h. todd, executive director
TRANSCRIPT
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay From Forest to Faucet: Priority for healthy watersheds
Albert H. Todd , Executive Director
Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
If you invented a BMP that would optimize watershed
protection …
it would look like a forest!
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
aylinking forests and water…
“... our runs dry up… several which would turn a mill are now scarce
sufficient for the farm. The reason is this, when the country was covered with
woods, the rain that fell was detained and had time to insinuate into the earth and contribute to our springs. But now the country is cleared and the rain as fast as it falls is hurried into our creeks and washes away the
soil...and hence creeks told by Mr. Penn to be navigable are no longer so”
from “Agriculture and County Life, 1753
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
“With the disappearance of the forest, all is changed”
George Perkins Marsh, 1864, from “Man and Nature”
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
Measures of Watershed healthMeasures of Watershed health**
Intercepts and stores rainfallModerates runoff & stream
flow Retains & recycles nutrientsSoils protected from erosionSupports healthy aquatic
systems Has capacity for self-repair
*Forests, water and climate change, USDA Forest Service 2008
A healthy watershed…
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay the “foresthydrologic
cycle”
Forests intercept, store, clean, and
regulate the flow of water
Source: Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working
Group, 1998
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay Watershed health is linked to forests…
Extent - amount of forest in watershed
Location - “critical” forests Riparian forests & wet woods/wetlands Steep slopes, erodible soils, urban tree cover
Condition - age, growth, health, etc.
Stewardship – ownership/management
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
I don’t have any information on this bit!
How we get water in our homes…
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay From the forest to the faucet…
• Why do we care?• Forested watersheds supply over
150 million people with drinking water nationally, 12 million in Bay watershed
• Lost forest means increased treatment costs and risk of contamination
• Concerns for the by-products of chemical treatment
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
1. Identify areas important to provision of quality surface drinking water supply
2. Understand the role of forests in protecting those surface drinking water
3. Identify threats that could affect forests future ability to protect drinking
Analysis ObjectivesAnalysis Objectives
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ayLimitsLimits
• Surface water intakes only not groundwater wells (make direct quality connection)
Source: Surface water intakes, EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS)
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay Map Scale
• Sub-watersheds = 12-digit HUC, lt blue lines
• > 88,000 HUCs
• Ave. size = 35 sq mi
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ayStep 1: Create an index of watershed importance to drinking water supply
• What is the relative importance of each sub-watershed in providing surface drinking water? • Water Yield• Population served• Distance to intake
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
aySurface Drinking
Water Importance Index: water
protection risk model
PRn = P0 + ∑ (Wi * Pi)
Pi = the population served by intakes in the ith downstream sub-watershed,
Wi = the proportional weight for ith downstream sub-watershed
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
aySurface Drinking Water Importance Index:
weighting by water supply
mean annual water supply
mean annual water supply
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
areas of surface drinking water importance (weighted by mean annual water supply)
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay Step 2: Importance of forests for surface drinking water
• To what extent do forests protect important watersheds for surface drinking water? • All forests• Private forests• All protected forests
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
the extent to which all forests are currently protecting areas of surface drinking water importance.
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
the extent to which private forests are currently protecting areas of surface drinking water importance.
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
Step 3: Threats facing forests important for surface drinking water
• To what extent do development, fire, and insects and disease threaten forests important to surface drinking water supply?
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
% of each sub-watershed expected to increase housing development in forested areas between 2000 and 2030 (Theobald)
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
Moderate Importance in coastal plain
Distribution of systems – small and medium sized supplies
Diversity of run of the river
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
Top 25% highest ranked watersheds
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
How is this information be used?
• Decision Making systems
• Evaluate impacts from land development
• Prioritize land protection
• Target local government/utility outreach
• Identify opportunities for payment systems
• Link with aquatic system & water quality goals
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay Less Forest Cover = Higher Treatment Costs
Impact of Forest Cover on Chemical Treatment Costs
$0.00
$50.00
$100.00
$150.00
$200.00
$250.00
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percent Forest in Drainage Area
Chem
ical c
ost/M
G
A 10% decline in forest cover leads to an $8-12 increase in
chemical costs per million gallons of water treated.
E.g. 26 MGD ($10) = 228.8 (365) = $ 95,000/yr
Or …
For every 10% decline in forest cover, there may be a 8-20%
increase in treatment costs. May be higher when other costs like
energy are added.
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
Putting a value on water payment for watershed services
• Consumer demand/willingness to pay
• A clear connection between forest and drinking water
• Future threat avoided or averted through management or protection
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
Examples of source water protection/drinking water
payments for watershed services programs
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
• Supply for 6+ million people
• Threat of regulation or protection of forests and agricultural lands
• Avoid $7+ billion investment
• $50 million/year in conservation vs. $300+ million/year in operating costs
• Enhanced services model
NYC Watershed
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
aySebago Watershed, Portland Water District
• Portland, Maine
• Water supply for 200,000 residents
• 92% of 282,000-acre watershed unprotected
• PWD recently approved program to spend $225K annually for forest easements
• Goal: double protected acreage over next ten years
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay Denver Water
• 2.5 + million people
• Colorado Front Range
• Fires result in floods and erosion -damaged treatment and storage facilities ($27 million)
• $25 million fund ($27 per household for 5 years – matched by USFS)
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
Sante Fe, NM
• City of Sante Fe, Watershed Association, TNC, USFS
• Prevent wildfire damage
• Forest thinning 17,000 acres
• 20-year 6.2 million plan - $6.50 per household per year
• $43.5 million in avoided costs in provisioning/regulating services
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
Common Waters Partnership
• Delaware River Basin
• PIC and US Endowment
• Priority conservation areas.
• Finance forest conservation & management practices for water quality
• Seeking donations from water users
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
Upper Neuse River Basins, NC
• Partners: Land trusts, water utilities of Raleigh and Durham
• Declining water quality
• Land acquisition & easements, BMPs, riparian buffers
• Raleigh and Durham raised $10 M in “nutrient impact fees” and increased water rates
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ayPayments for Watershed Services in Latin America
• Longest Running PWS programs
• National Programs in Costa Rica, Mexico, & Ecuador
• 5.7 Million Acres - $31M for Watershed Conservation
• Drinking Water, industry, and Hydropower partners
Costa Rica
Mexico
Equador
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
Ecuador - Quito Region
• Water Conservation Trust fund
• Water tariff /user fee(1 cent /m3) on water use or water dependent goods
• Land acquisition, management practices in 1.3 million acre area.
• Landowners receive enhanced support for improved management not cash payments.
Antisana Volcano – Nicole Balloffet
Quito, Ecuador - David Berkowitz ©©
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
"A town is saved, not more by the righteous citizens within it, than by
the woods that surround it..."
-Henry David Thoreau, 1862
Alli
ance
for
the
Ches
apea
ke B
ay
Albert H. Todd, Executive [email protected]
Questions?
Data and tools available at:
www.fs.fed.us/ecosystemservices/