from glasma to plasma in heavy ion collisions raju venugopalan brookhaven national laboratory...

27
From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

Upload: morris-johns

Post on 20-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

From Glasma to Plasma

in Heavy Ion CollisionsRaju Venugopalan

Brookhaven National Laboratory

Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

Page 2: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

2

What is the Glasma ?

Glasma (\Glahs-maa\):

Noun: non-equilibrium matter between Color Glass Condensate (CGC)& Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP)

Ludlam, McLerran, Physics Today (2003)

Page 3: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

3

Why is the Glasma relevant ?

o Intrinsic interest:

The Glasma is key to quantitative understanding of matter produced in HI collisions

How does bulk matter flow in the Glasma influence transport in the perfect fluid ? How do jets interact with the Glasma ?

o Initial conditions for the QGP:

Glasma fields are among strongest Electric & Magnetic fields in nature. What are their properties ?

Page 4: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

4

Big Bang

CGC/Glasma

QGP

Little Bang

WMAP data(3x105 years)

Inflation

Hot Era

Plot by T. Hatsuda

Page 5: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

5

Big Bang vs. Little Bang

Decaying Inflaton field with occupation # 1/g2

Decaying Glasma field with occupation # 1/g2

Explosive amplification of low mom. small fluctuations (preheating)

Explosive amplification of low mom. small fluctuations (Weibel instability ?)

Interaction of fluct./inflaton - thermalization

Interaction of fluct./Glasma - thermalization ?

Other common features: topological defects, turbulence ?

Page 6: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

6

Before the Little Bang Nuclear wavefunction at high energies

Renormalization Group (JIMWLK/BK) equations sum leading logs

αSY( )n

and high parton densities

αSρ( )n

Successful CGC phenomenology of HERA e+p; NMC e+A; RHIC d+A & A+A

Review: RV, arXiv:0707.1867, DIS 2007

Bremsstrahlung

∝αS

ln1

x

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟

Recombination

∝αSρ

+

= Saturation:

E2 ~ B2 ~1

αS

αSY

Page 7: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

7

Hadron wave-fns: universal features

T. Ullrich (see talk) -based onKowalski, Lappi, RV ; PRL 100, 022303 (2008)

CGC Effective Theory= classic fields + strong stochastic sources

>> 1

ρ ~1

g≈

1

αS

Upcoming test: current RHIC d+Au run - eg., forward di-jets (talk by C. Marquet)

Theory developments: running coupling in BKBalitsky;Albacete,Gardi,Kovchegov,Rummukainen,Weigert

αS(QS2) << 1

Page 8: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

8

How is Glasma formed in a Little Bang ?

Problem: Compute particle production in field theories with strong time dependent sources

Page 9: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

9

Glasma dynamics

perturbative vs non-perturbativeNon-perturbative for questions of interestin this talk

Interesting set of issues…not discussed here

(talks by Rajagopal and Iancu)

strong coupling vs weak coupling

Page 10: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

10

Systematic expansion for multiplicity moments

(=O(1/g2) and all orders in

(gρ)n)In QCD, solve Yang-Mills Eqns. for two nuclei

Glasma initial conditions frommatching classical CGCwave-fns on light coneKovner, McLerran, Weigert

Page 11: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

11

Numerical Simulations of

classical Glasma fields

LO Glasma fields are boost invariant

Krasnitz, Nara, RVLappi (see talk)

for

from extrapolating DIS data to RHIC energies

Page 12: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

12

LO Glasma MultiplicityAu-Au mult. at eta=0

Krasnitz, RV Kharzeev, Levin, Nardi

I) RHIC

II) LHC Pb+Pb at = 0≈ 950 - 1350 for Npart = 350(See Armesto talk for other LHC

predictions)Gelis,Stasto,RV

Page 13: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

13

Flow in the Glasma (I)• Large initial ET QS & NCGC Nhad consistent with strong isentropic flow. Initial conditions for hydro

Hirano, Nara

CGC- type initial conditions leave room for larger dissipation (viscosity) in hydro stage ?

Hirano et al., ; Drescher,NaraLappi, RV

• v2 (initial eccentricity)

Page 14: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

14

Flow in the Glasma (II)Partial thermalization and v2 fluctuations:

Bhalerao,Borghini,Blaizot,Ollitrault

Knudsen # K = /R with 1/K = cS dN/dy /area

Drescher,Dumitru,Gombeaud,Ollitrault

Partial thermalization fit suggests CGC gives lower v2 than Glauber

K0

Page 15: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

15

Flow in the Glasma (III)

o What’s the “pre-thermal” flow generated in the Glasma ?

Glasma v2

Krasnitz, Nara, RV: PLB 554, 21 (2003)

Glasma flow important for quantifying viscosity of sQGP

Classical field Classical field / Particle Particle

f < 1

Page 16: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

16

The unstable Glasma (I)

LO boost invariant E & B fields:- purely longitudinal for = 0+

- generate small amounts of topological charge

Kharzeev,Krasnitz,RVLappi,McLerran

pX,pY

pZ

Such configurations may lead to very anisotropic mom. dists. Weibel instability(see C. Greiner’s talk)

Page 17: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

17

The unstable Glasma (II)

• Small rapidity dependent quantum fluctuations of the LO Yang-Mills fields grow rapidly as

• E and B fields as large as EL and BL at time

increasing seed size

2500

Romatschke, RV:PRL,PRD(2006)

Page 18: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

18

The unstable Glasma (III)

Frequency of maximally unstablek mode grows rapidly

(Numerical studies by Frankfurt group - C. Greiner talk)

Romatschke, RV

Large angledeflections of coloredparticles in strong fields

Page 19: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

19

Small fluctuation spectrum

ab initio in the Glasma:

multiplicity moments to NLO

I) Anomalously low viscosityII) Large energy loss of jets in strong fields ?

Arnold, Moore; Mueller,Shoshi,Wong; Bödeker,Rummukainen

Turbulent isotropization on short time scales ?

(talks by Majumder and Müller)

III) Explosive generation of P and CP odd transitions via sphalerons (see Warringa’s talk)

Page 20: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

20

COBE FluctuationsCOBE Fluctuations

δt/t < 10-5, i.e. much smoother than a

baby’s bottom!

Another example of a small fluctuation spectrum…

Page 21: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

21

Multiplicity to NLO (=O(1) in g and all orders in (gρ)n )

+

Gluon pair production One loop contribution to classical field

Initial value problem with retarded boundary conditions- can be solved on a lattice in real time

Gelis, RV

(a la Gelis,Kajantie,Lappi for Fermion pair production)

Page 22: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

22

NLO and QCD Factorization

Gelis,Lappi,RV

What small fluctuations go into wave fn. and what go into particle production ?

Small x (JIMWLK)evolution of nucleus A -- sum (αSY)n terms

Small x (JIMWLK)evolution of nucleus B---sum (αSY)n terms

O(αS) but may

grow as

Page 23: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

23

From Glasma to Plasma NLO factorization formula:

With spectrum, can compute T - and match to hydro/kinetic theory

“Holy Grail” spectrum of small fluctuations. First computations and numerical simulations underway

Gelis,Fukushima,McLerranGelis,Lappi,RV

Page 24: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

24

Ridgeology** Rudy Hwa (see talk) + parallel session

Near side peak+ ridge (from talk by J. Putschke,STAR collaboration)Jet spectra Ridge spectra

pt,assoc,cutpt,assoc,cut

inclusive

inclusive

STAR preliminary STAR preliminary

Page 25: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

25

Two particle correlations in the Glasma: variance at

LO Gelis, RV: NPA 779 (2006), 177

Glasma sensitive to long range rapidity correlations:

E pEqd2Ncorr.d3pd3q

∝d3k

(2π )32Ek∫ h−kh+k( ) • f (p) f (q)( )

Fourier modes of classical field: O(1/g)

Fourier modes of small fluctuation field: O(1)

(talk by Gelis)

Page 26: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

26

Our take on the RidgeGelis,Lappi,RV

i) Long range rapidity correlations built in at early times

because Glasma background field is boost invariant. (These are the “beam” jets.)

ii) Rapidity correlations are preserved because matter density dilutes rapidly along the beam direction

Δφiii) Opacity effect in : Strong E & B fields destroy azimuthal correlations because survival probability of larger path lengths in radial direction is small (collimation a la Voloshin/Shuryak)

iv) May explain why features of the ridge persist for both soft and semi-hard associated particles

Need detailed models with realistic geometry effects

Page 27: From Glasma to Plasma in Heavy Ion Collisions Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory Topical Overview Talk, QM2008, Jaipur, Feb. 4th, 2008

27

Conclusions

I. Ab initio (NLO) calculations of the initial Glasma in HI collisions are becoming available

II. Quantifying how the Glasma thermalizes strongly constrains parameters of the (near) perfect fluid

III. Deep connections between QCD factorization and turbulent thermalization

IV. Possible explanation of interesting structures from jet+medium interactions