from lhc to clic and fcc: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

34
From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects Philippe Lebrun CLIC Workshop 2014 CERN, 3-7 February 2014

Upload: ken

Post on 25-Feb-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects. Philippe Lebrun CLIC Workshop 2014 CERN, 3-7 February 2014. The Future Circular Colliders (FCC) design study Aiming for CDR and Cost Review for the next ESU (2018). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issuesin the study of future large accelerator projects

Philippe Lebrun

CLIC Workshop 2014CERN, 3-7 February 2014

Page 2: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 2

The Future Circular Colliders (FCC) design study

Aiming for CDR and Cost Review for the next ESU (2018)

Ph. Lebrun

16 T 100 TeV in 100 km20 T 100 TeV in 80 km

• 80-100 km tunnel infrastructure in Geneva area• design driven by pp-collider requirements • with possibility of e+-e- (TLEP) and p-e (VLHeC)• CERN-hosted study performed in international

collaboration

Page 3: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 3

CLIC CDR and cost study (2012)

Ph. Lebrun

• 3 volumes: physics & detectors, accelerator complex, strategy, cost & schedule

• Collaborative effort: 40+ institutes worldwide• May be used as model for FCC CDR

Page 4: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 4

GeologyLongitudinal section along CLIC tunnel

Ph. LebrunJ. Osborne

Page 5: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 5

GeologyLongitudinal section along large ring in Geneva

basin

Ph. Lebrun

Page 6: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 6

Geotechniques for LEP & LHCApplicable to CLIC and FCC

Ph. Lebrun

TBM

Road header

Crossing aquifers by ground freezing

Page 7: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 7

Site/size optimization: the case of LEP

Ph. Lebrun

• Geology: stay out of Trias• Hydrology: preserve springs

at piedmont of Jura• Geotechnical: maximize

tunnel in “molasse” (1.41 % slope)

• Topography: limit overburden• Neighbourhood: integration

of surface buildings, noise, road traffic

• Cost• Performance: trade-off CE vs

accelerator technology

Page 8: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 8

Tunnel cross-sectionAccelerator components only

Ph. Lebrun

2 m

LEP/LHC

CLIC ILC “klystron cluster”

All tunnels drawn at same scale

Page 9: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

9

Tunnel cross-sectionAccelerator components & technical systems

Ph. Lebrun

2 m

LEP

ILC “kamaboko”

2 m

Need for a technical service tunnel?

All tunnels drawn at same scale

Page 10: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 10

Underground transport & installation

Ph. Lebrun

LEP monorail LHC

CLIC

• Floor or ceiling?• Personnel & equipment• Co-activities & safety

Page 11: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 11

A case in tunnel safety: the ventilation scheme

Ph. Lebrun

• Longitudinal– Tunnel is the air duct– Safety not guaranteed

downstream of danger area• Transverse

– Need (protected) fresh-air & extraction ducts in tunnel (larger X-section)

– Danger area can be segmented• Separate service/safety tunnel

– Also used for ventilation & pressure equalization

Page 12: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 12

Environment impact assessmentRequirements

• EIA (World Bank OP 4-01, 1999 rev. 2011)– An instrument to identify and assess the potential environmental

impacts of a proposed project, evaluate alternatives, and design appropriate mitigation, management, and monitoring measures

• Large projects require EIA– French law:

• Article R 122-8I du Code de l’Environnement• Décret 77-1141 du 12 October 1977

– Swiss federal law: • Ordonnance relative à l’étude de l’impact sur l’environnement (OEIE)

– EU:• Directive 85/337/EEC• Updated in 1997 (directive 97/11/EC), 2003 (directive 2003/35/EC),

2009 (directive 2009/31/EC)

Ph. LebrunC. Waaijer

Page 13: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 13

Environmental impact assessmentProcess

Ph. Lebrun

• Environmental Impact Study– Survey of initial state– Description of maximum impacts for all phases of construction &

operation– Environmental Management Plan for each phase

• Involvement of the public– Information sessions– Public enquiry

• Déclaration d’Utilité PubliqueC. Waaijer

Page 14: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 14

Environmental impact assessmentLHC impact study

Ph. Lebrun

Page 15: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 15

Environmental impact assessmentSurvey initial state

Fauna Flora

Geology & hydrology

Wind regime

Ph. Lebrun

Page 16: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 16

Environmental impact assessmentMinimize impacts

Road traffic

Visual impacts

Noise

Ph. Lebrun

Page 17: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 17

Industrial production of accelerator components CLIC vs LHC series numbers

1.E+00

1.E+01

1.E+02

1.E+03

1.E+04

1.E+05

1.E+06

1.E+07

1 10 100 1000

Number of variants

Max

imum

num

ber o

f uni

ts p

er v

aria

nt SuperconductorsMagnet componentsMagnetsPower convertersCryolinesVacuum

Flexible cells, manual work

Flexible workshops

Automatic chains

CLIC ASCLIC PETSCLIC QuadsCLIC TBM

AS quadrants

AS discs

LHC

CLIC

Ph. Lebrun

Page 18: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 18

Industrial production of accelerator components Measured learning curves of LHC

SC dipoles

P. Fessia

Collared coils

Cold masses

Ph. Lebrun

Page 19: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 19

Industrial production of accelerator components

Early involvement of industry in LHC SC dipoles

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Conceptual studies &models

R&D and validationprototypes

Final development

Industrialization & preseries

Series production

Industry

Ph. Lebrun

Page 20: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 20

Industrial production of accelerator components Industrialization & production

ramp-up of LHC SC dipoles

DevelopmentIndustrialization

Ph. Lebrun

Page 21: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 21

ScheduleProgress rate assumptions for CLIC

• Civil engineering– site installation: 15 weeks– shaft excavation and concrete:

• 180 m deep: 30 weeks• 150 m deep: 26 weeks• 100 m deep: 15 weeks

– service caverns: 35 weeks– excavation by tunnel-boring machine (TBM): 150 m/week

• Installation of general services– Survey & floor markings: 9 weeks/km/front– electrical general services: 8 weeks/km/front– cooling pipes & ventilation ducts: 8 weeks/km/front– AC and DC cabling: 8 weeks/km/front

• Installation of main linacs– Transport of two-beam modules: 500/month– Interconnection of two-beam modules: 300 to 400/month

Ph. Lebrun

Page 22: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 22

ScheduleCLIC Main Linac construction schedule – Scenario B

K. ForazYears K. Foraz

Ph. Lebrun

Page 23: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 23

ScheduleCLIC overall construction schedule - Scenario B

K. Foraz

Years

Construction of Main Linacs in the shade of injectors & experiments

Ph. Lebrun

Page 24: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 24

CostCost structure of large accelerator projects

Ph. Lebrun

CLIC 500

LHCLEP1

Page 25: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 25

Cost“Green field” cost of large accelerator projects

Ph. Lebrun

CLIC 500 ≡ “green field”

LHC “green field” (reconstructed)

Page 26: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 26

Cost mitigation: breakthrough vs gradual progress

The case of human genome sequencing

Sanger-based chemistryCapillary-based instruments

Ligation chemistryNanopore technology

Ph. Lebrun

Page 27: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 27

Understanding discontinuities in cost structure

First-order phase transition: CLIC energy stages

Ph. Lebrun

CLIC 500 GeV

CLIC 3 TeV

Page 28: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 28

Understanding discontinuities in cost structure Second-order phase transitions: high-

field SC magnets

Ph. Lebrun

Page 29: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 29

CLIC Study Costing Tool

• CLIC Study Costing Tool developed & maintained by CERN GS-AIS• Operational, on-line from C&S WG web page (access protected)• Includes features for currency conversion, price escalation and

uncertainty• Production of cross-tab reports exportable to EXCEL• Full traceability of input data

Ph. Lebrun

Page 30: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 30

sobriety

efficiencyenergy management

waste heat recovery

power & energy economy

Electrical power consumptionAccelerator

complexNominal

[MW]Standby

[MW]LHC 122 89HL-LHC 141 101CLIC 500 GeV

235 167

CLIC 1.5 TeV 364 190FCC e+e- 300? 100?FCC pp 250? 150?

Ph. Lebrun

Page 31: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 31

Electricity price projectionsEuropean Commission, Directorate-General for EnergyEU energy trends to 2030, Reference Scenario 2010

CERN average

Ph. Lebrun

Page 32: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 32

A path to energy savingsEnergy management

• Modulate scheduled operation to match peak electricity demand – Shutdown Seasonal load shedding– Waiting for beam Diurnal peak shavingStaging

ScenarioECM [TeV] P nominal

[MW]P waiting for beam

[MW]P shutdown [MW]

0.5 272 168 37A 1.4 364 190 42

3.0 589 268 580.5 235 167 35

B 1.5 364 190 423.0 589 268 58

• Variation of electricity demand in France (Source: RTE)

CLIC

Ph. Lebrun

Page 33: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects

CLIC Workshop 2014 33

Summary

• CERN’s past experience in designing, constructing and operating large accelerator projects at the energy frontier is an essential asset for the study of future such machines, CLIC and FCC

• These project studies raise novel issues not only in accelerator science and technology, but also in infrastructure and technical systems, as well as in the interrelations between them

• Early involvement of stakeholders in all relevant disciplines is necessary to address the resulting complexity and achieve globally optimized solutions

La pensée complexe est, essentiellement, la pensée qui intègre l’incertitude et qui est capable de concevoir l’organisation

Edgar MorinIntroduction à la pensée complexe

(1990) Ph. Lebrun

Page 34: From LHC to CLIC and FCC: some common issues in the study of future large accelerator projects