fsc monitoring & evaluation system january 2015 · phone +49 (0) 228 367 66 0 · fax +49 (0)...
TRANSCRIPT
FSC MONITORING & EVALUATION SYSTEM
Gaining insight into the impacts of the FSC® scheme is crucial for learning and for improving our work. FSC reports publicly about the status and improvements of each certified forest operation. In addition, FSC invests in a monitoring & evaluation (M&E) program. This M&E program serves two main purposes.
1. Organizational learning: to provide information to better understand the effectiveness of the organization and its strategies, and to identify issues, trends and areas for improvement
FSC senior management and the Board of Directors can use this information for impact-oriented management FSC staff, FSC members and FSC expert panels (e.g. standard development working groups) can integrate
lessons learned from M&E into the development of FSC standards, policies and strategies.
2. Communication of outcomes and impacts: to provide information about FSC-related research findings FSC offers a platform for researchers and other partners for communicating research findings on the
out comes and impacts of the FSC system, and for networking on impact-related research topics and methodologies
The impact-related stories can incentivize other FSC stakeholders to actively engage in the FSC system and to promote responsible forest management.
To systematically monitor and evaluate ʻchangesʼ triggered by FSC, the M&E program established an M&E system. With this M&E system FSC aims to continuously capture the most important changes, i.e. developments of the management of the certified forests and of conditions for supply chain actors. In compliance with the requirements of the ISEAL ʻImpacts Codeʼ,1 the full M&E System Report spells out in detail the scope of the FSC M&E framework – for example, which indicators will be used to measure the change and improvements in forest management facilitated by FSC, and who in the FSC systems collects which type of data. Indicators are derived from FSC’s M&E framework: FSC’s Theory of Change, Intended Impacts and related indicators.
Many actors contribute information for the evaluation of FSC’s impacts. Public forest management certification reports are full of relevant information, and various FSC units, national offices and independent researchers (among others) collect pertinent information for impact evaluations. The M&E program in FSC’s quality assurance unit compiles and evaluates the information for regular reporting. FSC stakeholders have been and will be consulted in the process of building and using the M&E system.2
The other side of this document gives examples from the FSC M&E System Indicators with parameters, frequency of reporting and sources of data, related to FSC’s intended impacts. Some reporting can start with the introduction of an aligned, electronic reporting format for forest management certificates. For the full version please see the M&E System Report. FSC will report the first evaluation results in the second quarter of 2015.
Forest Stewardship Council®
FSC Internat ional Center GmbH · Char les-de-Gaul le-Strasse 5 · 53113 Bonn · GermanyPhone +49 (0) 228 367 66 0 · Fax +49 (0) 228 367 66 30 · [email protected] · www.fsc.org · FSC® F000100
January 2015
1 IS
EA
L A
llian
ce’s
Cod
e of
Goo
d P
ract
ice
for A
sses
sing
the
Impa
cts
of S
ocia
l and
Env
ironm
enta
l Sta
ndar
ds.
2 S
take
hold
er e
ngag
emen
t in
the
proc
ess
of d
evel
opin
g FS
C’s
“The
ory
of C
hang
e” (i
n 20
13) a
nd id
entif
ying
inte
nded
and
uni
nten
ded
effe
cts
of F
SC
(at t
he F
SC
Gen
eral
Ass
embl
y in
201
4).
3 In
dica
tors
we
are
aim
ing
tow
ard,
but
are
not
yet
ava
ilabl
e.
FSC
M&
E S
yste
m In
dica
tors
– E
xam
ples
from
the
M&
E S
yste
m R
epor
t of i
nten
ded
impa
cts,
par
amet
ers
for e
valu
atio
n, a
nd fr
eque
ncy
of re
porti
ng
ECO
NO
MIC
SO
CIA
L EN
VIR
ON
MEN
TAL
G
ENER
AL
1. F
ores
t man
agem
ent (
FM) o
pera
tions
ga
in m
arke
t adv
anta
ges
thro
ugh
cert
ifica
tion.
1a
. Num
ber (
no.)
and
area
of c
ertifi
ed
oper
atio
ns is
gro
win
g in
all
clim
ate
zone
s an
d re
gion
s, fo
r nat
ural
and
pl
anta
tion
fore
sts,
for a
ll ow
ners
hip
stru
ctur
es a
nd s
izes
of o
pera
tions
. N
o. o
f re-
certi
fied
oper
atio
ns in
crea
ses.
D
ata,
freq
uenc
y an
d sa
mpl
e:
N
o. a
nd a
rea
of c
ertifi
ed a
nd
re
-cer
tified
ope
ratio
ns. T
rend
s
from
pre
viou
s ye
ars
com
pare
d
to
cur
rent
. For
all
FM c
ertifi
cate
s,
an
nual
repo
rts.
2. H
arve
stin
g ac
tiviti
es a
re b
ased
on
the
prin
cipl
e of
sus
tain
ed y
ield
s:
ther
e is
a b
alan
ce o
f gro
wth
and
yi
elds
of s
peci
fic s
peci
es.
2a. A
spira
tiona
l3 : Th
e ac
tual
har
vest
of
eac
h sp
ecie
s do
es n
ot e
xcee
d
allo
wab
le h
arve
stin
g ra
tes
over
de
fined
tim
efra
mes
.
R
elat
ions
bet
wee
n an
nual
allo
wab
le a
nd a
ctua
l har
vest
rate
s; fo
r sel
ecte
d si
tes
with
coun
terfa
ctua
ls.
3. F
M o
pera
tions
gai
n in
crea
sed
com
pete
nce,
e.g
. in
plan
ning
, im
pact
as
sess
men
t & e
valu
atio
n, s
ilvic
ultu
re,
heal
th &
saf
ety,
mar
ketin
g.
3c. E
.g. C
orre
ctiv
e ac
tion
requ
est (
CA
R)
anal
yses
ove
r eco
nom
ic, s
ocia
l,
envi
ronm
enta
l crit
eria
sho
w
less
ons
lear
ned.
Fo
r all
FM c
ertifi
cate
hold
ers
annu
ally
.
4. F
M o
pera
tions
hav
e go
od a
nd fa
ir re
latio
ns w
ith in
dige
nous
and
oth
er
loca
l com
mun
ities
, and
mai
ntai
n or
en
hanc
e fa
ir a
cces
s to
res
ourc
es
and
econ
omic
ben
efits
. 4c
. Asp
iratio
nal:
No.
and
qua
lity
of
addi
tiona
l soc
ial s
ervi
ces
deliv
ered
by
FSC
-cer
tified
man
agem
ent.
Acc
ess
to
fore
st re
sour
ces
and
mec
hani
sms
for
shar
ing
bene
fits
are
perc
eive
d lo
cally
to
be
fair.
E
.g. N
o. a
nd a
rea
of c
ertifi
ed
op
erat
ions
with
sol
ved
CA
Rs
re
late
d to
lega
l iss
ues.
Rep
orts
on c
ase
stud
ies.
5. F
ores
t-de
pend
ent,
fore
st-m
anag
ing
cert
ified
com
mun
ities
impr
ove
thei
r liv
elih
oods
as
wel
l as
thei
r fo
rest
m
anag
emen
t and
mar
ketin
g sk
ills.
5b
. Asp
iratio
nal:
No.
of p
eopl
e ob
tain
ing
an in
com
e th
roug
h FS
C is
incr
easi
ng.
R
egul
ar in
terv
iew
s of
mem
bers
of
the
smal
lhol
der s
uppo
rt
an
d of
the
mod
ular
app
roac
h
(M
AP
) pro
gram
s.
6. F
M o
pera
tions
impr
ove
wor
kers
’ liv
ing
and
wor
king
con
ditio
ns,
espe
cial
ly w
ith r
espe
ct to
oc
cupa
tiona
l hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y.
6a. A
spira
tiona
l: N
o. o
f mal
e / f
emal
e fo
rest
wor
kers
(inc
l. co
ntra
ctor
s) tr
aine
d in
saf
e w
orki
ng te
chni
ques
incr
ease
s.
Fo
r all
MA
P ca
ndid
ates
, qua
litat
ive
case
stu
dies
for s
ome
larg
e-sc
ale
oper
atio
ns.
7. M
inim
ized
deg
rada
tion
of n
atur
al
fore
sts,
no
conv
ersi
on o
f for
ests
to
othe
r la
nd u
se in
cer
tified
are
as.
7a. A
rea
of c
ertifi
ed F
M o
pera
tions
m
anag
ing
natu
ral f
ores
ts in
crea
sing
.
M
inim
ized
deg
rada
tion
of fo
rest
s,
no
con
vers
ion
of n
atur
al fo
rest
s to
plan
tatio
ns a
nd o
ther
land
use
s:
A
rea
of n
atur
al fo
rest
s in
cer
tified
natu
ral,
plan
tatio
n an
d m
ixed
fore
sts
oper
atio
ns in
crea
ses.
A
spira
tiona
l: S
ampl
e si
tes
show
evid
ence
that
afte
r five
yea
rs
de
fined
prio
rity
area
s ar
e no
t
sign
ifica
ntly
deg
rade
d.
8. F
M o
pera
tions
mai
ntai
n or
enh
ance
bi
odiv
ersi
ty. H
igh
cons
erva
tion
valu
es (H
CV)
of f
ores
ts a
re id
entifi
ed
with
sta
keho
lder
inpu
t and
m
aint
aine
d or
enh
ance
d th
roug
h
appr
opri
ate
man
agem
ent.
8b
. Are
a of
HC
V c
lass
es, s
et a
side
s,
repr
esen
tativ
e sa
mpl
es c
ompa
red
to
entir
e ce
rtifie
d ar
ea is
mai
ntai
ned
or
gro
win
g.
A
nnua
l rep
orts
abo
ut s
uch
area
s.
9. F
M o
pera
tions
iden
tify
and
m
aint
ain
the
fore
sts’
man
ifold
ec
osys
tem
ser
vice
s fr
om fo
rest
soi
l, w
ater
, bio
dive
rsity
. 9b
. Asp
iratio
nal:
Are
as c
ertifi
ed a
s
man
aged
for e
cosy
stem
ser
vice
(ES
S)
prov
isio
n ar
e m
aint
aine
d or
incr
easi
ng.
E
.g. N
o. a
nd a
reas
of f
ores
ts
of
ferin
g ce
rtifie
d E
SS
.
Tren
ds, a
nnua
lly.
10. F
M o
pera
tions
dev
elop
str
ateg
ies
to d
iver
sify
thei
r po
rtfo
lio o
f for
est
prod
ucts
, and
man
age
a br
oad
po
rtfo
lio to
incr
ease
env
iron
men
tal
and
econ
omic
res
ilien
ce.
10a.
Asp
iratio
nal:
Por
tfolio
of p
rodu
cts
incl
. les
ser k
now
n tim
ber s
peci
es, n
on-
timbe
r for
est p
rodu
cts
and
ES
S o
ffere
d as
cer
tified
is m
aint
aine
d or
gro
win
g.
N
o. o
f suc
h pr
oduc
ts o
ffere
d pe
r
certi
fied
oper
atio
n. T
rend
s of
prod
uct r
ange
ove
r tim
e pe
r reg
ion
an
d op
erat
ion
type
. Ann
ual r
epor
ts.
11. L
egal
com
plia
nce
by F
M o
pera
tions
an
d ex
clus
ion
of il
lega
l act
iviti
es
with
in th
e fo
rest
man
agem
ent u
nits
. 11
c. N
o. a
nd q
ualit
y of
CA
Rs
issu
ed
and
impl
emen
ted
in re
latio
n to
crit
eria
ad
dres
sing
lega
l com
plia
nce,
ille
gal
activ
ities
.
E
.g. A
naly
sis
of C
AR
s re
late
d to
hum
an ri
ghts
, pro
tect
ed a
reas
, rar
e
spec
ies
with
in a
nd in
rela
tion
to th
e
certi
fied
oper
atio
n. A
nnua
l rep
orts
.
12. F
SC b
rings
toge
ther
div
erse
gro
ups
of
peo
ple
to c
raft
polic
y; w
ith lo
cal a
nd
inte
rnat
iona
l con
sist
ency
; em
pow
er
mar
gina
lized
sta
keho
lder
gro
ups.
12
c. E
.g. N
o. o
f FSC
mem
bers
per
cha
mbe
r an
d le
vel o
f FS
C a
war
enes
s gr
owin
g.
N
o. a
nd s
truct
ure
of m
embe
rshi
p;
st
atis
tics
abou
t pro
mpt
ed
re
cogn
ition
of “
FSC
,” us
ers
of
FS
C w
ebsi
tes.
Ann
ual r
epor
ting.
PRO
MO
TIO
N O
F R
ESPO
NSI
BLE
FO
RES
T M
AN
AG
EMEN
T: H
IGH
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E A
ND
INN
OVA
TIO
N –
SO
CIA
L, E
CO
NO
MIC
AN
D E
NVI
RO
NM
ENTA
L B
ENEF
ITS
ON
TH
E G
RO
UN
D
Photo credits: 2 - © Dairybelle