für mensch und umwelt river bank filtration- overview and experimental applications with...
TRANSCRIPT
für Mensch und Umwelt
River Bank Filtration- Overview and Experimental Applications with Cyanotoxins
Dakos Vasilis Federal Environment Agency (UBA), Berlin, Germany
für Mensch und Umwelt
River Bank Filtration (RBF) is the naturally occurring influx of surface water to the groundwater. The water flows from the bed and banks of the river body through sand and gravel aquifers into wells or filtration galleries adjacent to the river.
Bank Filtrate is river water that has passed through the river banks and proceeded to the groundwater.
•From a water resources perspective, this process is characterized by an improvement in water quality, thus RBF is considered as pretreatment of surface water for drinking purposes.
Part I.Part I.
DefinitionDefinition
für Mensch und Umwelt
At present Rhine, Ruhr, Danube, Elbe, Ohio, Great Miami and Thames
•France 50% of the total drinking water production
•Netherlands 5% of the total drinking water supply (=62,4 million m3/y)
•USA quite limited- renewed interest (alternative water treatment technology)
•Germany approximately 16% of drinking water
HistoryHistoryPart I. Part I.
PAST
PRESENT
RBF employed in Europe since the 19th century
Along rivers Rhine and Elbe (Germany) for over 120 years potable drinking water
für Mensch und Umwelt
Principal
As water flows through the subsoil to the aquifer, pollutants can be retained or eliminated, partially or totally, in the porous medium.
DescriptionDescriptionPart I.Part I.
Feasibility
Strong hydraulic connection between recharging river and wellsHOW? pumping wells along the river banks
für Mensch und Umwelt
Processes during RBFProcesses during RBF
Part I.Part I.
Hydrodynamical convective-dispersive transfer, dilution
Physicochemical
complexation, flocculation/coagulation, redox reactions, precipitation
Biological microflora (biodegradation)
Mechanical filtration of particulate matter
für Mensch und Umwelt
BiodegradationBiodegradation
Key Role Microbiological activity
Biofilm: conglomerate of fully hydrated polymeric gel and bacteria
Part I.Part I.
catalysing many redox reactions
hydrolysis solubilisation of solid organic matter fermentative
anaerobic bacteria
mineralisation of organic matter
für Mensch und Umwelt
Treatment of Bank-filtrateTreatment of Bank-filtrate
Earlier years: No treatment- Direct drinking
Nowadays
(because of pollution)
Part I.Part I.
für Mensch und Umwelt
AdvantagesAdvantages
Surface (quantity) Groundwater (quality)
•High availability(even in dry periods)
•Saving of groundwater resources
•Removal of bacteria, viruses, parasites
•Removal of particles
•Removal of easily biodegradable compounds
•Reduction of persistent organic contaminants and heavy metals
•Constant composition and temperature
•Absence of faecal contamination
•Compensation of concentration peaks
•Barrier against shock loads
Part I.Part I.
•Easily applied
•Cost-effective drinking water pre-treatment step
In addition:
für Mensch und Umwelt
EfficiencyEfficiency Depends on:Soil-related conditions•quality and porosity of the soil•residence time of the water in the underground•water’s temperature• pH conditions•oxygen concentration
•Riverwater-related conditions•quality quantity changes in the river (particles, concentration of dissolved organic matter, oxygen, ammonia, nutrients, microorganisms other pollutants)
Must be noted: specific claims impossible.
HOWEVER Bank filtrate can be regarded as good groundwater
Part I.Part I.
für Mensch und Umwelt
ProblemsProblems
Low efficiency for the elimination of:
• endocrine disrupting agencies
• non-biodegradable pharmaceuticals from hospitals
c. alkynophenoles used in special detergents
• Reason:polar molecules with hydrophilic groups, penetrate banks
endangering drinking water supplies
BUT:
It is the long-term contamination by persistent compounds that affects negatively the bank filtrate.
Solution: should be removed from wastewater plants at point of
production or replaced by biodegradable less hazardous substances
Part I.Part I.
für Mensch und Umwelt
Experimental Applications RBF and Removal of Experimental Applications RBF and Removal of CyanotoxinsCyanotoxins
Introduction
Why Cyanotoxins?
Since 1960‘s blooms of cyanobacteria in Lakes and rivers in
Berlin
Dangerous for health
Berlin‘s lake and river systems
intensively used for drinking water
via RBF.
Part II.Part II.
High scientific interest and
importance for public health
für Mensch und Umwelt
Characteristics of MicrocystinsCharacteristics of Microcystins
• cyclic heptapeptides
• about 70 structural variants
• occur in different Cyanobacteria (Microcystis aeruginosa)
• water soluble
• highly hepatotoxic
• tumor promoters
• max. reported concs along Havel river: 25 000 µg/L
• usually between 1 and 10 µg/L during algal blooms
• WHO guideline value: 1 µg/L
• cyclic heptapeptides
• about 70 structural variants
• occur in different Cyanobacteria (Microcystis aeruginosa)
• water soluble
• highly hepatotoxic
• tumor promoters
• max. reported concs along Havel river: 25 000 µg/L
• usually between 1 and 10 µg/L during algal blooms
• WHO guideline value: 1 µg/L
Part II.Part II.
für Mensch und Umwelt
H OCH3
H3C H
H
CH3
H
HH
H3C
HS
S O
HN
H COOH
O
N
R²
CH2
O
NH
H
H3C
R
O
XHN
COOHH
S
R1H
O
ZNH
X, Z: variable L-amino acids,R1, R2: H or CH3.
Cyclic heptapeptides
General Structure of Microcystins (MC)General Structure of Microcystins (MC)Part II.Part II.
für Mensch und Umwelt
A. Field Observations- Wannsee
Efficacy of Bank Filtration for the removal of microcystinsEfficacy of Bank Filtration for the removal of microcystins
Part II.Part II.
für Mensch und Umwelt
Materials and MethodsMaterials and Methods
ELISA (Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay) specific immunological assay based on the reaction of all microcystins with antibodies.
HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography) separates individual microcystin variables by their absorption spectrogram in a photodiode array detector.
Part II.Part II.
•Samples from upper most aquifer
•Analysis of microcystis with ELISA (Measurement of MC content)
•HPLC(verification of results, distinguishes MC-variants)
für Mensch und Umwelt
Results/ConclusionsResults/Conclusions
•Typical values for blooms in the summer
•Very small fraction is recovered in the bank filtrate
Surface water Wells
Part II.Part II.
für Mensch und Umwelt
B. Field-scale experiments- MarienfeldeB. Field-scale experiments- Marienfelde
Simulating installation for RBF and Slow sand filtration (SSF)
In this case SSF was used to simulate RBF:
a) purification process depends also on biological activity of biofilm
b) similar mechanisms governing flow of water to the aquifer (dispersion, percolation, adsorption)
c) slow flow regime of the rivers in the area around Berlin, especially during the summer months when cyanobacterial blooms occur make RBF and SSF similar
Part II.Part II.
für Mensch und Umwelt
Description of installationDescription of installation
storage pond
> 2 m 1.5 - 2 m 1 – 1.5 m
55
.4 m
45.5 m
water surface area: 3294 m²total area: 5290 m²
88 m
8
1 7. 5
m
slow sand filters & infiltration ponds
bank filtration
8 piezzometersinlet
Part II.Part II.
für Mensch und Umwelt
5 m2 m 7 m22 m
piezzometersstorage pond
slow sand filter
about 4 m
gravel (8 - 20 mm)
gravel (2 - 8 mm)
sand (0.8 - 2 mm)
gravel (32 - 56 mm)
concrete
drainage pipe
Cross-section through the Bank Filtration SiteCross-section through the Bank Filtration Site
Part II.Part II.
für Mensch und Umwelt
AdvantagesAdvantages
a)a) experiments of hazardous substances can be carried out experiments of hazardous substances can be carried out on a field scale without adverse environmental impacts,on a field scale without adverse environmental impacts,
b)b) external conditions scale factors (e.g. weather conditions) external conditions scale factors (e.g. weather conditions) similar to real environment similar to real environment
c)c) elimination performance can be quantifiedelimination performance can be quantified
Part II.Part II.
für Mensch und Umwelt
2 m³/h
2 m³/h
initial concentration: 8 µg/L MC
average residence time:4.5 h
20 cm/h
lysed cells of Planktothrix agardhii ssp.
hourly samples of water body
hourly samples of effluent
1. Investigation of elimination of dissolved MC through SSF1. Investigation of elimination of dissolved MC through SSF
Methods and Materials
•Analyses by ELISA and HPLC
Part II.Part II.
für Mensch und Umwelt
Results in water body and effluentResults in water body and effluent
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
hours after toxin application
su
m m
icro
cysti
ns i
n µ
g/L
(> 8
5 %
MC
-LR
)
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
3,5
4,0tra
cer c
on
cen
tratio
n
(µg
/L)
MC (HPLC) water body MC (HPLC) effluent
tracer in water body (calculated) tracer in effluent
Until 30 h after toxin application:applied MC: 267 mgrecovered MC: 4.3 mg=> elimination: 98.4 %
•Little adsorption (simultaneously appearance with tracer)
•In 33 hours 98,4 % elimination of toxin
•Values under WHO limit concs.
Part II.Part II.
für Mensch und Umwelt
2. Assessment of SSF performance in eliminating cell-bound MC2. Assessment of SSF performance in eliminating cell-bound MC
Methods and MaterialsMethods and Materials
0.5 m³/h
0.5 m³/h
live cells of Planktothrix agardhii ssp.
initially: 40 µg/L MC
average residence time:15 h
5 cm/h
daily samples of water body
daily samples of effluent
•Analyses by ELISA and HPLC
Part II.Part II.
für Mensch und Umwelt
ResultsResults
0.1
1.0
10.0
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26days after application of cyanobacteria
mic
roc
ysti
ns
(µg
/L)
/ bio
volu
me
(cm
³/m
³)
0.1
1.0
10.0
100
biovolume of Planktothrix
MC (ELISA, total) in water body
MC (ELISA, total) in effluent
WHO guideline-value
•Elimination rate diminishes from 99% to 50% (lower biodegradation, release of MC by dying population)
•MC concs below WHO guidelines
Part II.Part II.
für Mensch und Umwelt
Conclusions/OutlookConclusions/Outlook
• RBF cost-effective pretreatmnet for drinking water supply
• High efficiency in removing hazardous contaminants from groundwater, even cyanobacterial toxins
THOUGH:
There is need for more investigations on:
• MC cyanobacterial cells sedimented to the bottom of a river body.
• microcystin degrading bacteria
• the efficacy of microcystin degradation during RBF also in conditions of fast flowing rivers and under anaerobic conditions
In the experimental field of the German Federal Environment Agency in Berlin these issues are to be examined in future projects.