functional matrix hypothesis- revisited
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
FUNCTIONAL MATRIX HYPOTHESIS- REVISITED
PRESENTED BY SUSNA PAUL
![Page 2: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
CONTENTS
• FUNCTIONAL MATRIX THEORY- ORIGINAL
• FUNCTIONAL MATRIX HYPOTHESIS- REVISITED ROLE OF MECHANOTRANSDUCTION ROLE OF AN OSSEOUS CONNECTED CELLULAR NETWORK GENOMIC THESIS EPIGENETIC ANTITHESIS & RESOLVING SYNTHESIS
• REFERENCES
![Page 3: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
FUNCTIONAL MATRIX THEORY(1960s)
• The concept of this theory was introduced first by Vander Klaaw (1948-52).
• Melvin L. Moss developed the functional matrix hypothesis.
![Page 4: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The craniofacial skeleton develops initially and later grows in direct response to the extrinsic epigenetic environment..
BONES DO NOT GROW ,THEY ARE GROWN
![Page 5: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
DEFINITION
The origin, form, position, growth and maintenance of all skeletal tissues and organs are always secondary, compensatory and necessary responses to chronologically and morphologically prior events or processes that occur in specifically related nonskeletal tissues, organs or functioning spaces (functional matrices).
![Page 6: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
ExplanationThe FMH considers the head, not the skull as a composite
area of individual encapsulate areas..
Totality of skeletal structure+ soft tissue+ functioning space
Functional Cranial Component
![Page 7: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
FUNCTIONAL CRANIAL COMPONENT
SKELETAL UNIT FUNCTIONAL MATRIX
MICRO MACRO PERIOSTEAL
CAPSULAR
![Page 8: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
SKELETAL UNIT
MICRO SKELETAL• Skeletal units may be composed variably of bone, cartilage
or tendinous tissues. • When a bone consists of a number of skeletal units, we call
them micro skeletal units..
![Page 9: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
MACRO SKELETAL• When adjoining portions of a number of neighboring bones are
united to function as a single cranial component, we term this as a macro-skeletal unit.
• eg: endocranial surface of the calvaria
![Page 10: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
THE FUNCTIONAL MATRIXTHE PERIOSTEAL MATRIX
This corresponds to the immediate local environment, which acts directly..
Egs: muscles, blood vessels, nerves, glands, teeth..
![Page 11: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• The periosteal matrices stimulation causes direct growth of the microskeletal units.
• Effect on the size and/or shape of the skeletal unit by osseous deposition and resorption.
TRANSFORMATION
![Page 12: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
THE CAPSULAR MATRIX
Defined as the organ and spaces that occupy a broader anatomical complex.
Each capsule is an envelope - contain a series of FCC - skeletal unit and the related functional matrices..
Sandwiched between two covering layers
![Page 13: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
OROFACIAL CAPSULEIn this, the cover consists of skin and mucous membrane.
The orofacial capsule surrounds and protects the orofacial functional matrix..
![Page 14: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The volumetric expansion of the orophoryngeal functioning spaces
Increase in the size of the capsule
The whole of the included and enclosed functional components, are translated to a new position in space.
![Page 15: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
NEUROCRANIAL CAPSULE
• In this, the cover consists of skin and duramater.
• The neuro-cranial capsule surrounds and protects the neurocranial functional matrix..
![Page 16: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The expansion of the enclosed capsular matrix volume.
The capsule enlarges
The whole of the included and enclosed functional components, are
carried outward in a totally passive manner.
![Page 17: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
• Thus the capsular matrices acts indirectly on the macroskeletal units and are carried outward in a passive manner.
• The location in space of the skeletal unit is changed, not by osseous deposition and resorption.
TRANSLATION
![Page 18: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
FUNCTIONAL CRANIAL COMPLEX
GROWTH
TRANSLATION
TRANSFORMATION
CAPSULAR MATRIX
PERIOSTEAL MATRIX
MACROSKELETON
MICROSKELETON
SKELETAL UNITFUNCTIONAL MATRIX
![Page 19: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
CONSTRAINTS OF THE FMH
1. Methodologic constraint: Macroscopic measurements which use the techniques of point mechanics and arbitrary reference frames.
Roentgenographic cephalometry permitted only method specific descriptions that cannot be structurally detailed. This constraint was removed..
![Page 20: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
2. Hierarchical constraint:
This version’s descriptions did not extend “downward” to processes at the cellular, subcellular or molecular structural domains or extend
“upwards” to the multicellular process by which bone tissues respond to lower level signals.
![Page 21: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
1.Mechanotransduction occurs in single bone cells.
2.Bone cells are computational elements that function multicellularly as a connected cellular network.
.
![Page 22: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
MECHANO TRANSDUCTION
All vital cells are irritable and respond to alterations in their external environment.
1. Mechanoreception 2. Mechanotransduction
![Page 23: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Osseous Mechanotransduction
![Page 24: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
1.Unlike other mechanosensory cells ,bone cell are not specialized for such stimuli
2.These cells shows aneural transmission of signals.
3. Bone loading stimulus evoke three adaptational responses.
4. The changes brought about by stimuli are confined to a single bone to which the signal is transduced.
![Page 25: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Translates the information content of a periosteal functional matrix stimulus into a skeletal unit cell signal
![Page 26: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
MECHANOTRANSDUCTION
Ionic / electricalMechanical
![Page 27: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Stretch Activated channel
Activation of plasma membrane stretch activated ion channels
Intra cellular electric events
![Page 28: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Electromechanical Involves the osteocytic plasma membrane.
it contains voltage activated ion channels and transmembrane ion flow..
![Page 29: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Electrokinetic
Bound and unbound electrical charges, associated with the bone fluids.
Electrical effects in the fluid filled bone are electrokinetic i.e. streaming potential.
![Page 30: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
MECHANICAL PROCESS
This is an alternate means by which functional matrix may regulate the lower cell bone cell.
![Page 31: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
The physical continuity of the transmembrane molecule integrin
![Page 32: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
MECHANORECEPTION
MECHANOTRANSDUCTION
IONIC MECHANICAL
STRETCH ACTIVATED CHANNELS INTEGRIN
ELECTRIC EVENTS
ELECTROMECHANICAL ELECTROKINETIC
![Page 33: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
CONNECTED CELLULAR NETWORK
All bone cells, expect osteoclasts are extensively interconnected by gap junctions.
Present laterally and vertically.
.
Superficial osteoblast Superficial osteoblast
Periosteal and endosteal osteoblasts
Periosteal and endosteal osteoblasts
Preosteoblastic cellPreosteoblastic cell
CONNECTED CELLULAR NETWORK
![Page 34: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
• Network theory Initial layer cells –stimuli (loading)
summation
Intracellular signal (mechanotransduction)
Hidden layer cells (adj. Osteocytes)
Final layer cells (osteoblasts) output
![Page 35: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
The CCNs show oscillation, i.e. reciprocal signaling (feedback) between layers.
Gap junctions are electrical synapses that permit bi-directional signal traffic
![Page 36: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
ionic transport through the bone cell plasma membrane
intercellular transmission are computed by the operation of an osseous connected cellular network
bone responses
![Page 37: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
![Page 38: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
• explanatory chain extending from the
epigenetic event of skeletal muscle contraction, hierarchically downward (through the cellular and molecular levels to the bone cell genome and then) upwards again through histologic levels to the event of gross bone form adaptational changes.
![Page 39: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
The revised FMH consist of the presentation of, a thesis and an anti-thesis and of a resolving synthesis.
![Page 40: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
GENOMIC THESIS
• The genomic thesis holds that the genome, from the moment of fertilization, contains all the information necessary to regulate..
![Page 41: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
• Genomic thesis claims that prenatal cranio facial development is controlled by two inter related processes:
1. Initial regulatory (Homeobox) gene activity.2 Activity of the regulatory molecular groups: growth factor families
and steroid/thyroid family.
![Page 42: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
EPIGENETIC ANTITHESIS
The genomic thesis passes directly from molecules to morphogenesis: directly from DNA molecules to adult morphology, ignoring the
roles of the many epigenetic processes and mechanism.
![Page 43: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
The epigenetic antithesis detailing the processes and mechanisms seeking to clarify the casual chain between genome & phenotype.
• Process Series of action or operation that had towards a particular result.
• Mechanism Fundamental physical or chemical process(es) involved in, or responsible for an action, reaction or other nailed phenomenon
![Page 44: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Epigenetics refers to the entire series of interactions among cells and cell products, which leads to morphogenesis and differentiation..
![Page 45: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
A RESOLVING SYNTHESIS
• Morphogenesis is regulated (controlled, caused) by the activity of both genomic and epigenetic processes and mechanisms.
![Page 46: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
REFERENCES
• The functional matrix revisited.1. The role of mechanotransduction. AJODO –1997 ; 112 :8-11.
• The functional matrix revisted 2. The role of an osseous connected cellular network AJODO -1997; 112:221-6
• The functional matrix revisited.3 .The genomic thesis AJODO-1997;112:338-42
• The functional matrix revisited.4 .The epigenetic antithesis AJODO-1997;112:410-7
![Page 47: Functional matrix Hypothesis- Revisited](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061319/587172b61a28ab230b8b464d/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)