fundamentals of gas transport in tight gas sandstones and shales

Upload: dayna-rodriguez-zambrano

Post on 04-Jun-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Fundamentals of Gas Transport in Tight Gas Sandstones and Shales

    1/6

    Fundamentals of Gas Transport in Tight Gas Sandstones andShales

    Principal Investigator: Steven L. Bryant (in collaboration with Masa Prodanovic, Peter Eichhubl

    (BEG) and Peter Flemings (BEG))

    Mechanisms of Porosity Reduction

    Several unique characteristics of these rocks are the consequence of post depositional diagenetic

    processes including mechanical compaction, quartz and other mineral cementation, and mineral

    dissolution. These processes lead to permanent alteration of the initial pore structure causing an

    increase in the number of isolated and disconnected pores and thus in the tortuosity. The

    objective of this research is to develop a pore scale model of the geological processes that create

    tight gas sandstones and to carry out drainage simulations in these models. These models can be

    used to understand the flow connections between tight gas sandstone matrix and the hydraulic

    fractures needed for commercial production rates.

    Mechanistic model of compaction of a mixture of ductile and rigid grains

  • 8/14/2019 Fundamentals of Gas Transport in Tight Gas Sandstones and Shales

    2/6

    Grain-scale compaction model explains experimental observations, including

    threshold ductile content for complete loss of porosity

    Network models of intergranular pore space cannot explain mercury

    intrusion capillary pressure experiments in tight gas sandstones! We have

    developed a new class of model to explain this phenomenon.

    Physics of Flow in Shales

  • 8/14/2019 Fundamentals of Gas Transport in Tight Gas Sandstones and Shales

    3/6

    Grain scale models of void space in shale, coupled with models of the physics of gas transport in

    confined conduits, enable predictions of the effective permeability to gas during production of a

    shale reservoir. The model predicts significant increase in permeability as reservoir pressure

    decreases, which is consistent with the slower decline in production rates characteristic of shale

    gas wells.

    The ratio of gas permeability at pressures below initial reservoir pressure,

    kg2,insitu, to gas permeability at initial pressure (P=28MPa), kg1,insitu, increases

    as production continues and pressure declines accordingly.

    Structure of Nanopores in Shales

    Recent observations of nanopores within carbonaceous material in mudrocks have led to thehypothesis that such material provides conduits for gas migration within the mudrock matrix.

    This hypothesis requires that the carbonaceous material exist not as isolated grains but as

    connected clusters of grains within the mudrock. To examine this hypothesis, we develop an

    algorithm for the grain-scale modeling of the spatial distribution of grains of carbonaceous matter

    in a matrix of non-carbonaceous material (silt, clay). The algorithm produces a grain-scale model

    of the sediment which is precursor to a mudrock, then a sequence of models of the grain

    arrangement as burial compacts the sediment into mudrock. We determine the size distribution of

    clusters of touching carbonaceous grains, focusing particularly upon the approach toward

  • 8/14/2019 Fundamentals of Gas Transport in Tight Gas Sandstones and Shales

    4/6

    percolation (when a cluster spans the entire packing). The model allows estimation of threshold

    fraction of carbonaceous material for significantly connected clusters to form. Beyond a

    threshold degree of compaction, connected clusters become much more prevalent. The

    emergence of large numbers of clusters, or of a few large clusters, increases the probability that

    nanoporous conduits within the clusters would intersect a fracture in the mudrock. This should

    correlate with greater producibility of gas from the mudrock.

    Relationship between number of clusters and sediment porosity with 5 percent

    of carbonaceous material in the initial bulk volume for initial sediment

    porosity of 70%. The number of clusters having more than 10 grains of

    touching carbonaceous material (purple dots) is negligible in the original

    sediment (porosity = 70%) but becomes appreciable when compaction

    decreases the porosity below 40%.

    Influence of Water on Gas Production

    In tight gas sandstone the productivity of a well is sometimes quite different from that of a

    nearby well. Several mechanisms for this observation have been advanced. Of interest in this

    paper is the possibility that a small change in water saturation can change the gas phase

    permeability significantly in rocks with small porosity and very small permeability. We quantify

    the effect of small saturations of the wetting phase on nonwetting phase relative permeability by

    modeling the geometry of the wetting phase. We also show how a porosity-reducing process

    relevant in tight gas sandstones magnifies this effect.

  • 8/14/2019 Fundamentals of Gas Transport in Tight Gas Sandstones and Shales

    5/6

    Gas effective permeability for tight sandstones: experimental data and

    trends of model predictions. Confining pressure increases the sensitivity of

    effective gas permeability to small water saturations. If water saturation

    increases exclusively by changing the number and size of pendular

    rings/liquid bridges (no pore-filling), the gas permeability (red line)

    decreases faster than observed. If water saturation increases exclusively by

    pore filling (no rings/bridges), the gas permeability decreases more slowly

    than observed. Rings and bridges are thus the main mechanism for watersensitivity at small saturations.

    Publications and Presentations

    Sakhaee-Pour, A. and Bryant, S. "Producibility of tight gas sandstones," to be submitted,AAPG Bulletin, 2011.

  • 8/14/2019 Fundamentals of Gas Transport in Tight Gas Sandstones and Shales

    6/6

    Sakhaee-Pour, A. and Bryant, S. "Gas Permeability of Shale," SPE 146944 prepared forpresentation at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Denver,

    Colorado, USA, 30 October-2 November 2011.

    Mousavi, M. "Pore scale characterization and modeling of two-phase flow in tight gassandstones," Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, 2010.

    Kumar, A. "Quantitative Geometric Model of Connected Carbonaceous Material inMudrocks," M.S. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, 2010.

    Motealleh, S. and Bryant, S. "Quantitative Mechanism for Permeability Reduction by SmallWater Saturation in Tight Gas Sandstones," Soc. Pet. Eng. J., Volume 14, Number 2, June

    2009, pp. 252-258.

    Motealleh, S. "Mechanistic study of menisci motion within homogeneously andheterogeneously wet porous media," Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin,

    2009.

    Mousavi, M. and Bryant, S. "Connectivity of Pore Space: The Primary Control on Two-Phase Flow Properties of Tight-Gas Sands," American Association of Petroleum Geologist

    Annual Convention and Exhibition, Denver, CO, 7-10 Jun 2009.

    Mousavi, M. and Bryant, S. "Predicting the effect of diagenetic alteration on two phaseflow properties in tight gas sands," American Association of Petroleum Geologists

    Southwest Section 2008 Convention, Abilene, Texas, 24-27 Feb. 2008.

    Motealleh, S. and Bryant, S.L. "Predictive model for permeability reduction by smallwetting phase saturations," Water Resour. Res., 43, W12S07, doi:10.1029/2006WR005684,

    2007.

    Mousavi, M. and Bryant, S. "Geometric Models of Porosity Reduction Mechanisms inTight Gas Sands," SPE 107963, 2007 SPE Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Technology

    Symposium, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A., 16-18 April 2007.

    Motealleh, S. and Bryant, S. "Predictive Model for Permeability Reduction by SmallWetting Phase Saturations," Proceedings of the Computational Methods in Water

    Resources Conference XVI, Copenhagen, June 19-22, 2006.

    For additional info, please contact Steven L. Bryant ([email protected]).

    See theUnconventional Resources pagefor information on related research.

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.cpge.utexas.edu/ur/http://www.cpge.utexas.edu/ur/http://www.cpge.utexas.edu/ur/http://www.cpge.utexas.edu/ur/mailto:[email protected]