future of mobilitymexicoautosummit.com/presentations/mark_barrott.pdf · 2019. 11. 5. · vehicle...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Future of MobilityDisruptive Technologies Create New Realities
October 30th, 2019
2
39,000+400+ 11th
Manufacturing Industry Expertise
Automotive clients Ranked 11th largest CPA and consulting firm in the U.S.
Broad Industry Services
27 OfficesUSA, Japan, Mexico, China, India
➢ Senior manufacturing professionals averaging 20+ years of
industry experience
➢ Substantial global and international expertise
➢ Access to specialized knowledge through the Plante Moran
Mobility Intelligence Center™➢ Deep automotive industry involvement
o Original Equipment Suppliers Association (OESA)
o Society of Automotive Analysts (SAA)
o Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE)
o Precision Metalforming Association (PMA)
o Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME)
Strategy &operations
Cybersecurity Enterpriserisk management
Enterprise resource planning
Tax Audit &accounting
Talent & organization development
Wealthmanagement
Mergers &acquisitions
Professionals Worldwide
Manufacturing and distribution clients
Plante Moran Manufacturing PracticeAt a Glance
2,500+
Strategy & Operations Consulting Capabilities
➢ Business strategy development
➢ Market analysis
➢ Strategic planning
➢ Data analytics
➢ Competitor intelligence
➢ Market entry planning
➢ Business model development and analysis
➢ Program and product launch
➢ Strategic sourcing and procurement
➢ Lean manufacturing and inventory management
Data Analytics
3
Case study: Disruptive technology
4
2 Mobility
Where is the automotive industry going? Megatrends to understand
1 Autonomy
3 Electrification
4 Manufacturing the vehicle
55
Modeling the Future
Non-linear exponential Growth of Mobility
• Mobility forecasting model has been based on
differentiated addressable markets, adoption
timing and willingness to pay for new
technology
• Uptake phases: Innovators, Early Adopters, Early
Majority, and Late Majority, and Laggards
Traditional forecasting models for technology growth are limited due to their linear nature. The Plante Moran model utilizes non-linear
projections for disruptive technology based upon algorithms (e.g. differential equations) which are driven by market based model inputs.
Consumer Uptake - Phases ofNew Technology
Innovators
Early Adopters
Early / Late Majority
Laggards
Output InputDrivers
Autonomous
• OEM autonomous commercialization plans• Added cost of autonomy to customers• Customer willingness to pay for autonomy• Autonomous technology maturity• Government autonomous regulations
Mobility
• Autonomous vehicles as % of vehicle parc• Vehicle miles traveled
• Passenger and commercial vehicles
• Competitive market passenger miles• Domestic airline, bus, transit, rail, other
• Autonomous enabled miles• Unlicensed population, increased access to young and
elderly, increased miles from lives saved
• Use of autonomous vehicles % shared vs private• Annual utilization of shared and private vehicles
• Miles and % of 24hr day
• Life of vehicle in total miles traveled• Life in years of shared and private vehicles
• Total Lifetime Miles/ Avg Annual Miles
66
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
2017 2020 2023 2026 2029 2032 2035 2038 2041 2044 2047 2050
Ve
hic
le M
iles
Tra
ve
led
(B
illio
ns)
Mobility Projections (U.S.)Vehicle Miles Traveled Drive Vehicle Demand
Private - Autonomous Shared - AutonomousNon Autonomous
Vehicle Type Key
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2017 2020 2023 2026 2029 2032 2035 2038 2041 2044 2047 2050
Ve
hic
le P
arc
(Mill
ion
s)
-
5
10
15
20
25
2017 2020 2023 2026 2029 2032 2035 2038 2041 2044 2047 2050
Ve
hic
le S
ale
s (M
illio
ns)
Vehicle Miles Traveled Vehicles in Operation (VIO)
Annual New Vehicle Sales
• Growth in miles traveled will be driven by autonomous vehicles capturing competitive and untouched markets• Vehicles in Operation decrease over time due to the increased utilization and efficiency of shared autonomous vehicles • Introduction of autonomy increases annual sales and shifts customer base from private ownership to shared ownership
77
Electrified Vehicle Projections (U.S.)Adoption will Accelerate
Model Inputs Factors
Market Dynamics
• Lower fuel and electricity cost• Improving electric infrastructure• EVs available in most vehicle segments
Government Regulations
• CAFE requirements • Government incentives for infrastructure and EV
purchases• 11 States adopting Zero Emissions vehicle
standards
Technology Advances
• Electrification cost becomes comparable to ICE over time
• ICE cost grows due to fuel efficiency requirements
Customer Perception
• Social pressure to reduce emissions• Range anxiety declines with increase battery
efficiency and reduced costsSource: Plante Moran
Mix of electrified powertrains steadily replace internal combustion engines over the next 20 years until cost, regulations and technology advances drive the rapid adoption of battery electric vehicles
EV Model DriversVehicle Powertrain Projections
0
5
10
15
20
25
2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 2042 2047
Ve
hic
le S
ale
s (M
Un
its)
ICE HEV PHEV BEV
Note: Hydrogen fuel cell propulsion technologies did not have significant volume in projections, due to uncertain infrastructure for fueling and product costs.
Projected PHEV/BEV
Market Share:2030 – 20%2040 – 53%2050 – 88%
8
Mobility business model driversTransportation behavior will change
Shared mobilityPrivate vehicle ownership
Today Future
Buying vehicles Buying miles
Vehicle price Asset efficiency
How we consume transportation
How we buy transportation
OEM response
New Mobility Business Model Prerequisites
1. Longer Vehicle Life:
• Enabled by enhanced engineering, advanced materials and manufacturing
• Metric – miles driven
2. Vehicle Uptime (Availability):
• Enabled by rigorous preventative maintenance regime
• Metric - % availability (uptime)
3. Vehicle Utilization:
• Enabled by matching riders with vehicles – right place, right time
• Metric - % of day vehicle is utilized
9
By 2050, disruptive changes in the industry will drive significant shifts in how transportation is consumed
New vehicle sales
$610B
Used vehicle sales
$685B
Gas/diesel/ electricity
$254B
Insurance$234B
Financing$120B
Repair/ maintenance
$72B
Public transit/ car rental/taxi
$119B
Mobility as a Service (MaaS)*
$27B
Other$271B
2017$2.4 Trillion
New vehicle sales
$625B
Used vehicle sales
$679B
Gas/diesel/ electricity
$209B
Insurance$253B
Financing$119B
Repair/ maintenance
$79B
Public transit/ car rental/taxi
$117B
Mobility as a Service (MaaS)*
$176B
Other$255B
2027$2.5 Trillion
Minimal change
New vehicle sales
$867B
Used vehicle sales
$165B
Gas/diesel/ electricity
$189B
Insurance$173B
Financing$153B
Repair/ maintenance
$233B
Public transit/ car rental/taxi
$17B
Mobility as a Service (MaaS)*
$3.4T
Other$590B
2050$5.7 Trillion
Large growth and shifts
*Mobility as a Service (MaaS) – only includes transportation revenue miles. Other mobility revenue streams included in Other.
U.S. mobility revenues Transportation spend projections reflect disruptive changes
1010
Pay for Miles Business ModelConceptual Impact
• The pay for miles based mobility model upsides:
• Potential for increased margins
• Recurring, fee based revenue
• Reduced earnings volatility to support investment planning
• Reduced cyclicality
• The pay for miles based mobility model downsides :
• Deferred return on capital
• Risk of asset underperformance
The pay for miles business model is driven by price per mile, vehicle utilization and asset longevity:
Vehicle Retirement -300,000 Miles
Impact of increased utilization on vehicle sales vs miles sales business models
Business model breakeven point–180,00 miles @ 20 cents per mile
Years
$K
1 2 3 4 5 6
50
40
30
20
10
60
1111
Pay for Miles Business ModelLimiting Downside Risk
--
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
Mile
s (m
illio
ns)
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
Mile
s (m
illio
ns)
U.S. Passenger Vehicle SalesSource: Wards Auto
U.S. Passenger Vehicle Miles TraveledSource: U.S. DoT
- 11 %
- 36 %- 2 %
1 %
2 % - 2 %
• Miles traveled has historically been less volatile than vehicle sales
• In all recent US vehicle sales downturns miles travelled has either increased or only slightly declined:
• 1991
• U.S. passenger vehicle sales decreased 11%• U.S. passenger miles traveled increased 1%
• 1995
• U.S. passenger vehicle sales decreased 2%• U.S. passenger miles traveled increased 3%
• 2003
• U.S. passenger vehicle sales decreased 2%• U.S. passenger miles traveled increased 2%
• 2008-2010
• U.S. passenger vehicle sales decreased 36%• U.S. passenger miles traveled decreased 2%
- 2 %
3 %
12
Now
Current State
Business model Vehicles produced
Economic
Model
Customers
Product
Development
Lifecycle
Capabilities
Product
Future
Miles driven
Private owners “MaaS” fleet operators
One time product sales Mileage based annuity revenue stream
Multiple platforms requiring major redesign 7-8 year development cycle
Skateboard platform requiring refresh design 2-3 year development cycle
OEM internal RD&E – duplicative, costly, viewed as a market differentiator.
Manufacturing is core competency
OEMs focus on mobility and customer experience. RD&E and manufacturing
shifts to proven, capable suppliers
Differentiated designs, ICE components, mechanical focus, many parts per
vehicle
Modular design for component replacement, electrified powertrains, autonomous capability, connected technology, less parts per vehicle
Evolution of the automotive model4 Ways Suppliers will be Disrupted
How Suppliers Are Paid
What Speed Suppliers Operate
What Suppliers Make
What Suppliers Do
Supplier Disruptions Factors
1313
Evolution of the Powertrain
Component Transition and Elimination
Onboard Charging ModuleDC/DC Converter
Inverter
Traction Motor
Battery Pack
Fuel System
Air Intake System
Exhaust System
Engine
Transmission
ICE Powertrain Components EV Powertrain Components
Market Shifts
• Converging disruptions (autonomy, sharing and powertrain efficiency) will increase the
pace of adoption of electrification
• Powertrain components will transition to EV specific technology over time, eliminating
demand for many types of products throughout the vehicle
14
Evolution of the Automobile Chassis
Changing Requirements for Common, Modular
Skateboard
Skateboard
Skateboard
Pickup Application
SUV Application
Shuttle Bus Application
Electric Vehicle Skateboard ChassisICE Chassis
• Vehicle differentiation requirements for end customers decline
• Utilitarian applications provide broader, common customer experience through
autonomous, shared, electrified vehicles
Variable Skateboard Applications
1515
Evolution of the Interior Space
Shifting Expectations of the User Experience
• Interior focus still in the cockpit, but with more technology available
• Interior features widespread use of accent color and soft surfaces
• Focused on convenience and safety
• Mid-segment standard technologies include:▪ In-dash displays ▪ Bluetooth connectivity ▪ Basic driver assistance systems
• Interior physical features highly streamlined
• Focused on personalization, connectivity, driver information, appearance, and safety
• Technology features to be carried over in future vehicle generations:
▪ Smart surfaces (not physical switches)
▪ Ambient lighting
▪ Ambient and slim HVAC outlets
▪ More and larger touch screens
▪ Natural voice recognition and gesture control
• Interior design is used to differentiate their vehicles in the market
2025 and Beyond“Autonomous and Shared”
2020 – 2025“Personalized and Connected”
2015 – 2020Current Interiors
2000 – 2015Traditional Interior of the Past
• Interior is the “3rd living space”• Advancement of personalized and connected
technology
• Interior is the focus of the user experience and the primary human machine interface (HMI)
• Vehicle adapts to the user by automatically making adjustments to match user preference (e.g. temperature)
• Interior maximizes user enjoyment and satisfaction through their experiences inside –air, light, touch
2008 Chevrolet Trailblazer SS 2018 Chevrolet Equinox Mercedes-Benz F 015 Luxury in Motion Concept2018 Tesla Model 3 Featuring Next Gen Design / Technology
• Cockpit focus to layout of the interior
• Interiors are largely monochromatic, feature widespread use of plastics and limited use of soft surfaces
• Introduction of advanced technology includes: ▪ Graphics capable LCD displays ▪ Partially reconfigurable instrument clusters ▪ In-dash navigation
• Technology was introduced in premium vehicles in the early 2000’s and migrated to mid-segment vehicles through 2017
16
Future Value Chain for mobilityDriving role changes throughout the Value Chain
Seamless capabilities from Manufacturing to Mobility will require tightly integrated, real time information
Vehicle and Supplier Manufacturing(including Engineering)
MaaS and Mobility Operations
Ownership
&
Financing
Vehicle
Owners• Fleets• Private• Fractional
Financing• Loans• Leases• Subscription• Pay per mile
Insurance• Personal• Vehicle• Ride
Mobility Services Provider• Pay per ride/sharing• Freight/package service• Specialized mobility services• Mobility technology broker/interface
Connectivity• V2V communications• Telecommunications access• Vehicle data – OTA updates, monitoring• In-vehicle infotainment services
Mobility Operations Services• Vehicle maintenance and repair• Vehicle staging – cleaning, replenishing,
charging, scheduling, storage• Vehicle roadside assistance• Passenger biometrics support
Mobility Infrastructure• Parking location, availability, price• Traffic flow, route optimization• Vehicle to infrastructure (SmartCity)
Key Vehicle Manufacturing Characteristics• Utilitarian styled vehicles
• Common platform architectures
• Modular design for component replacement
• High volume production for cost efficiencies
Powertrain – ICE and EV Chassis Interiors ExteriorsElectronics &
AutonomousOther
Systems/Components
• Electrified powertrains
• Autonomous capability
• Connected technology
17
Are you positioned for the future?Using a structured evaluation approach
“Vision Creation”
Plante Moran’s Strategic Planning Model
“Plan and Implement”
• Is the Company’s product portfolio structured to adapt to the future trends ?
• Does the Company have the capabilities to adjust to changing market demand and role in the value chain?
• Does the company have the right relationships throughout the value chain?
• Is the company capitalized properly to meet the investment needed to compete?
• Does the Company have a clear strategy to address future market challenges?
18
Contact information
Mark BarrottPrincipal
Strategy Practice
+1 248 223-3272
Visit plantemoran.com/automotive for more information.