future trends in the treatment of the neonatal abstinence syndrome walter k. kraft, md associate...
TRANSCRIPT
Future Trends in the Treatment of
the Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
Walter K. Kraft, MDWalter K. Kraft, MD
Associate ProfessorAssociate Professor
Director, Clinical Research Director, Clinical Research UnitUnit
Thomas Jefferson UniversityThomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, PAPhiladelphia, PA
Disclosure (past 3 years)
Research Grants Research Grants
Merck, Schering
Bristol Myers Squibb
Data Safety Monitoring BoardData Safety Monitoring Board
Wyeth, RePros Therapeutics
Speakers Panel Speakers Panel
None
Consulting Consulting
Merck
Synageva
OutlineOutline
Limitations of Current TherapiesLimitations of Current Therapies Potential New DrugsPotential New Drugs
ClonidineClonidine BuprenorphineBuprenorphine
Ongoing ResearchOngoing Research Future NeedsFuture Needs
Opioid Neonatal Abstinence Opioid Neonatal Abstinence SyndromeSyndrome
Newborns of mothers with chronic useNewborns of mothers with chronic use Methadone, buprenorphine, morphine, heroinMethadone, buprenorphine, morphine, heroin 5% of 56,000 women in US who reported heroin 5% of 56,000 women in US who reported heroin
use in previous month were pregnantuse in previous month were pregnantSAMHSA. 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings., SAMHSA. 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings.,
NSDUH Series H-32, NSDUH Series H-32, DHHS Publication No. SMA 07-4293). Rockville, MD. 2007DHHS Publication No. SMA 07-4293). Rockville, MD. 2007
In Australia 40 cases per 10,000 live In Australia 40 cases per 10,000 live birthsbirths US extrapolation—16,000/yrUS extrapolation—16,000/yr
O'Donnell M. Pediatrics. 2009; 123(4):e614-21 O'Donnell M. Pediatrics. 2009; 123(4):e614-21
Signs and symptomsSigns and symptoms NeurologicNeurologic GIGI AutonomicAutonomic
Why do we treat NAS with Why do we treat NAS with medications?medications?
Weight gainWeight gain Ensure developmentEnsure development Prevent seizuresPrevent seizures Patient comfortPatient comfort
Pharmacologic Pharmacologic TreatmentTreatment
Opiates are preferred therapyOpiates are preferred therapy Improve weight gain and reduce need for Improve weight gain and reduce need for
supportive care, but at cost of longer supportive care, but at cost of longer hospital stayshospital stays
Osborn, DA; Opiate treatment for opiate withdrawal in newborn infants. The Cochrane Osborn, DA; Opiate treatment for opiate withdrawal in newborn infants. The Cochrane Library 2007Library 2007
Benzodiazapines helpful only in seizuresBenzodiazapines helpful only in seizures Phenobarbital useful as adjunct therapyPhenobarbital useful as adjunct therapy
Osborn, DA; Sedatives for opiate withdrawal in newborn infants. The Cochrane Osborn, DA; Sedatives for opiate withdrawal in newborn infants. The Cochrane Library 2007Library 2007
Common Drug Common Drug TreatmentsTreatments
MorphineMorphine PhenobarbitalPhenobarbital Tincture of opiumTincture of opium MethadoneMethadone Chloral hyrdateChloral hyrdate Paregoric Paregoric
What is the problem?What is the problem?
At least 50% of infants require At least 50% of infants require pharmacologic treatmentpharmacologic treatment We just don’t know which onesWe just don’t know which ones
Hospital stays are too longHospital stays are too long Home treatment difficultHome treatment difficult No generally recognized standard of No generally recognized standard of
carecare Other drug-induced withdrawal Other drug-induced withdrawal
symptomssymptoms
Goals of treatment for Goals of treatment for NASNAS
shortened hospital stayshortened hospital stay shortened time of exposure to shortened time of exposure to
opiatesopiates lowered hospital costs lowered hospital costs improved parentingimproved parenting
maternal-infant bondingmaternal-infant bonding lessened maternal guilt lessened maternal guilt
Greif J. Subst Abuse Treat. 1993; 10(4):339-34Greif J. Subst Abuse Treat. 1993; 10(4):339-34
ClonidineClonidine
Alpha 2 adrenergic agonistAlpha 2 adrenergic agonist Decreases catecholamine release in Decreases catecholamine release in
the CNSthe CNS Common usesCommon uses
HypertensionHypertension Acute opioid withdrawalAcute opioid withdrawal
Low dose opioidsLow dose opioids Low dose methadoneLow dose methadone Rapid detoxificationRapid detoxification
ClonidineClonidine Cochrane Review: Adult opioid withdrawalCochrane Review: Adult opioid withdrawal
More effective than placeboMore effective than placebo More side effects compared to tapering More side effects compared to tapering
methadonemethadone
Gowing L, Farrell M, Ali R, White JM. Alpha2-adrenergic agonists for the Gowing L, Farrell M, Ali R, White JM. Alpha2-adrenergic agonists for the management of opioid withdrawal. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;management of opioid withdrawal. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD002024(2):CD002024
Side effectsSide effects HypotensionHypotension Rebound hypertensionRebound hypertension Dry mouthDry mouth SedationSedation
Clonidine in NASClonidine in NASYearYear nn Clonidine Clonidine
dose dose (mcg/kg)(mcg/kg)
Hoder, Hoder, 19841984
Case Case SeriesSeries
77 0.5–1.0 po 0.5–1.0 po Q 6 hrQ 6 hr
13 day LOS13 day LOS
Leikin, Leikin, 20092009
Case Case SeriesSeries
1414 0.5–1.0 po 0.5–1.0 po Q 6 hrQ 6 hr
7 day LOT7 day LOT
In utero In utero exposures = 3exposures = 3
Iatrogenic NAS = Iatrogenic NAS = 1111
EsmaeEsmaeili, ili, 20102010
Case Case SeriesSeries
2929 0.5–3.0 hr 0.5–3.0 hr IV IV
14 day LOT14 day LOT
32 day LOS32 day LOS
Chloryl hydrate Chloryl hydrate rescuerescue
Agthe, Agthe, 20092009
RCTRCT 4040 1.0 po Q 4 1.0 po Q 4 hr (+ hr (+ morphine)morphine)
11 day LOT vs. 15 11 day LOT vs. 15 for placebofor placebo
Agthe: Secondary Agthe: Secondary EndpointsEndpoints
Treatment failures: 5 vs. 0 with clonidineTreatment failures: 5 vs. 0 with clonidine Seizures: 3 vs. 0 with clonidineSeizures: 3 vs. 0 with clonidine Deaths: 0 vs. 3 with clonidine (all post Deaths: 0 vs. 3 with clonidine (all post
discharge)discharge) MyocarditisMyocarditis SIDSSIDS Homicide (methadone overdose)Homicide (methadone overdose)
DSMB ruled these not clonidine relatedDSMB ruled these not clonidine related SVT noted 3 days following cessation of SVT noted 3 days following cessation of
clonidineclonidine Heart rate and blood pressure changes noted, Heart rate and blood pressure changes noted,
but none outside of normal rangesbut none outside of normal ranges
ClonidineClonidine Optimal useOptimal use
Adjunct to opioidAdjunct to opioid Fixed doseFixed dose 1.5 mcg/kg q 4 starting week 2?1.5 mcg/kg q 4 starting week 2?
Xie HG. J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 May 19. [Epub ahead of print]Xie HG. J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 May 19. [Epub ahead of print]
FormulationFormulation Liquid oral vs. transdermalLiquid oral vs. transdermal
BuprenorphineBuprenorphine Cochrane Review: Management of Cochrane Review: Management of
withdrawal in adultswithdrawal in adults More effective than clonidineMore effective than clonidine Probably quicker in resolution of withdrawal Probably quicker in resolution of withdrawal
symptomssymptoms Longer duration of treatment but higher rates Longer duration of treatment but higher rates
of completionof completion
Gowing L, Ali R, White JM. Buprenorphine for the management of opioid Gowing L, Ali R, White JM. Buprenorphine for the management of opioid withdrawal. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD002025.withdrawal. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD002025.
Safety margin Safety margin Increasing use in adultsIncreasing use in adults
Pregnant femalesPregnant females
Potential Advantage in Potential Advantage in NASNAS
SafetySafety Ceiling effect on respiratory depressionCeiling effect on respiratory depression Fatalities in adults primarily seen with Fatalities in adults primarily seen with
concomitant benzodiazapine abuse concomitant benzodiazapine abuse Less abuse potentialLess abuse potential Long half lifeLong half life
Improved control of abstinence?Improved control of abstinence? Ability to wean out of the hospital?Ability to wean out of the hospital?
Challenges to use in Challenges to use in NeonatesNeonates
No pediatric indicationNo pediatric indication One study in preterm critically ill infants One study in preterm critically ill infants
using IV formulationusing IV formulation Case reports of maternal use of Case reports of maternal use of
buprenorphinebuprenorphine No good PK dataNo good PK data Sublingual administrationSublingual administration Metabolic ontogenyMetabolic ontogeny Unknown potency of norbuprenorphineUnknown potency of norbuprenorphine
Clinical Trial Study GoalClinical Trial Study Goal
PrimaryPrimary
Demonstrate sublingual buprenorphine for Demonstrate sublingual buprenorphine for NAS is safe, tolerable, and feasibleNAS is safe, tolerable, and feasible
SecondarySecondary
1) Investigate comparative efficacy for 1) Investigate comparative efficacy for endpoints of length of treatment and endpoints of length of treatment and length of staylength of stay
2) Explore buprenorphine 2) Explore buprenorphine pharmacokinetics pharmacokinetics
Buprenorphine ProtocolBuprenorphine Protocol
4.4 4.4 gm/kg q8 buprenorphine sublingual gm/kg q8 buprenorphine sublingual (Buprenex in 30% alcohol/sucrose)(Buprenex in 30% alcohol/sucrose)
Dose up-titration by 20%Dose up-titration by 20% ~one PK sample/day~one PK sample/day Weaning by 10%/dose after stable 48 hoursWeaning by 10%/dose after stable 48 hours Cessation at or near initial doseCessation at or near initial dose Provision for rescue dose followed by up-Provision for rescue dose followed by up-
titrationtitration At maximum 39 At maximum 39 gm/kg/day, rescue with gm/kg/day, rescue with
phenobarbitalphenobarbital Observation for 48 hr after cessation of Observation for 48 hr after cessation of
therapytherapy
Dose adjustmentDose adjustment
ObservationObservation Lower than expected bup concentrationLower than expected bup concentration Rapid up-titrationRapid up-titration Relatively frequent need for phenobarbital rescueRelatively frequent need for phenobarbital rescue
Adjusted doseAdjusted dose 1) Increase initial daily dose from 13.2 mcg/kg to 15.9 1) Increase initial daily dose from 13.2 mcg/kg to 15.9
mcg/kgmcg/kg 2) Increase the up-titration from 20% increase to 25% 2) Increase the up-titration from 20% increase to 25%
increaseincrease 3) Increase maximum daily dose from 39 mcg/kg to 60 3) Increase maximum daily dose from 39 mcg/kg to 60
mcg/kgmcg/kg
UpdateUpdate
24 patients randomized to new dose schema24 patients randomized to new dose schema
23
35
30
40
4 2
Length of treatment Length of Stay PhenobarbitalAdjunct
Buprenorphine (12)
Morphine (25)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Morphine Buprenophine
Length of Treatment: All treated patients in
trial (N=50)
Safety: Serious EventsSafety: Serious Events Status epilepticus, Status epilepticus,
treated with treated with lorazepam and lorazepam and phenobarbitalphenobarbital
Full-term female, Full-term female, scores of 4-6 after 3 scores of 4-6 after 3 days of treatmentdays of treatment
Neurological work Neurological work up negativeup negative
Level = 0.35 ng/mL Level = 0.35 ng/mL Normal Normal development at 12 development at 12 months of agemonths of age
Elevated liver Elevated liver enzymes enzymes associated with associated with cytomegalovirus cytomegalovirus infectioninfection
Poor feeding, Poor feeding, aminoaciduriaaminoaciduria
Abnormalities Abnormalities persisted weeks persisted weeks after dechallengeafter dechallenge
BuprenorphineBuprenorphineSummarySummary
Appears as safe as, and more Appears as safe as, and more efficacious than morphineefficacious than morphine
Efficacy needs to be tested in Efficacy needs to be tested in blinded clinical trialblinded clinical trial
Use may facilitate expansion into Use may facilitate expansion into outpatient treatmentoutpatient treatment
3138
47
0
10
20
30
40
50
Duration of
Therapy (days)
Non-benzodiazepineexposedPoly-substanceexposed
Benzodiazepineexposed
Polysubstance abusePolysubstance abuseThomas Jefferson University Hospital 2000-06Thomas Jefferson University Hospital 2000-06
Seligman NS,. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199(4):396.e1-396.e7
Polysubstance abusePolysubstance abuse
CommonCommon Up to 50% of babies at risk for NAS Up to 50% of babies at risk for NAS
have exposure to benzodiazepineshave exposure to benzodiazepines Worse outcomesWorse outcomes
Cause or marker of treatment Cause or marker of treatment resistance?resistance?
Even less clarity of optimal Even less clarity of optimal treatmenttreatment
Effects of concomitant Effects of concomitant psychiatric medicationspsychiatric medications
10.3% of drug-using pregnant women 10.3% of drug-using pregnant women had other psychiatric disorders had other psychiatric disorders compared to 1.4% of controlscompared to 1.4% of controls
Kennare R. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;45:220–225Kennare R. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;45:220–225. .
56% of participants in MOTHER study 56% of participants in MOTHER study had prescription for psychiatric had prescription for psychiatric medication during pregnancymedication during pregnancy Mostly anxiolytics and SSRIsMostly anxiolytics and SSRIs Benzodiazepines were exclusion criteriaBenzodiazepines were exclusion criteria
Martin PR. Am J Addict. 2009 ; 18(2): 148–156Martin PR. Am J Addict. 2009 ; 18(2): 148–156
Neonatal responses Neonatal responses to to in uteroin utero exposure exposure
AntidepressantAntidepressant Mild CNS and respiratory systemsMild CNS and respiratory systems 3-5 day duration, self limited3-5 day duration, self limited
Koren G. CMAJ. 2005; 172(11):1457-1459 Koren G. CMAJ. 2005; 172(11):1457-1459 Ferreira E. Pediatrics. 2007; 119(1):52Ferreira E. Pediatrics. 2007; 119(1):52
AntipsychoticsAntipsychotics Adults have mild withdrawal symptoms of Adults have mild withdrawal symptoms of
agitation and insomnia agitation and insomnia Anecdotal reports of hypertonicity and early Anecdotal reports of hypertonicity and early
onset NASonset NAS Paucity of published reports of neonatal Paucity of published reports of neonatal
withdrawalwithdrawalEinarson A. Use and safety of antipsychotic drugs during pregnancy. J Einarson A. Use and safety of antipsychotic drugs during pregnancy. J
Psychiatr Pract. 2009 Psychiatr Pract. 2009 May;15(3):183-92.May;15(3):183-92.
PharmacogeneticsPharmacogenetics P glycoproteinP glycoprotein
ABB1 haplotypes have been associated with ABB1 haplotypes have been associated with decreased methadone requirementsdecreased methadone requirements
Coller JK. Cln Pharmacol Ther. 2006,80:682-90
Mu opioid receptor Mu opioid receptor Polymorphism A118G has reduced response to Polymorphism A118G has reduced response to
ligands and has been associated with ligands and has been associated with differential pain response, but not methadone differential pain response, but not methadone dosagedosage
A118G may represent propensity for heroin A118G may represent propensity for heroin abuseabuse
Weaker candidatesWeaker candidates dopamine receptor type 1, preproenkephalin dopamine receptor type 1, preproenkephalin
and preprodynorphinand preprodynorphin
Drakenberg K,. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(20):7883-7888Somogyi AA, Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;81(3):429
Skorpen F, Palliat Med. 2008; 22(4):310-327
Will a genetic test tell us Will a genetic test tell us who we can send home who we can send home
early?early?Not any time soon!Not any time soon!
Association of genes with addiction Association of genes with addiction in adults not establishedin adults not established
Relevance of adult polymorphisms to Relevance of adult polymorphisms to neonates unclearneonates unclear
Responses are polygenic and not Responses are polygenic and not monogenicmonogenic Example of sickle cell anemiaExample of sickle cell anemia
PK/PD modelingPK/PD modeling
Powerful mathematical techniques to Powerful mathematical techniques to evaluate dataevaluate data Drug levels with sparse samplingDrug levels with sparse sampling NAS scoresNAS scores Age, weight, developmentAge, weight, development
Assess sources of variabilityAssess sources of variability Understand the biology of Understand the biology of
developmentdevelopment Predict best dosePredict best dose
PK/PD model of PK/PD model of buprenorphine in neonatesbuprenorphine in neonates
Time (hr)
Con
c (n
g/m
L)
0 100 200 300
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
ID = 12
ObservedPredicted Individual
PK/PD models in NASPK/PD models in NAS
ClonidineClonidineXie HG. J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 May 19. [Epub ahead of print]Xie HG. J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 May 19. [Epub ahead of print]
BuprenorphineBuprenorphine MorphineMorphine
IV models availableIV models available NO ORAL DATA!NO ORAL DATA!
Long term developmental Long term developmental effects of NAS treatmenteffects of NAS treatment
Very difficult data to obtainVery difficult data to obtain NAS treatment vs. NASNAS treatment vs. NAS Post discharge effects likely dwarf Post discharge effects likely dwarf
treatmenttreatment Even if there were developmental Even if there were developmental
effects, how would these risks effects, how would these risks compare to non-treatment of NAS?compare to non-treatment of NAS?
Actively Recruiting Actively Recruiting Clinical TrialsClinical Trials
Maternal acupuncture Maternal acupuncture P. Janssen, Univ. British ColumbiaP. Janssen, Univ. British Columbia LOT primary outcomeLOT primary outcome RCTRCT
Fetal neurobehavior and autonomic Fetal neurobehavior and autonomic tonetone L. Jansson, Johns HopkinsL. Jansson, Johns Hopkins Two observational cohortsTwo observational cohorts
Summary of Future Summary of Future TrendsTrends
Increased research in clonidine and Increased research in clonidine and buprenorphinebuprenorphine
PharmacogeneticsPharmacogenetics Polysubstance abuse treatmentPolysubstance abuse treatment Dose optimizationDose optimization Clear need for more researchClear need for more research