f.vermeersch sck•cen

16
Radiation Protection optimisation 3D planning tools and their applicability to occupational exposure at a fusion power plant F.Vermeersch SCK•CEN EFDA 27 juni 2006 EFDA monitoring meeting

Upload: gen

Post on 06-Jan-2016

40 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Radiation Protection optimisation 3D planning tools and their applicability to occupational exposure at a fusion power plant. F.Vermeersch SCK•CEN. EFDA 27 juni 2006. EFDA monitoring meeting. Aim. Investigate the applicability of 3D dose simulation tools for a fusion power plant Operation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: F.Vermeersch SCK•CEN

Radiation Protection optimisation3D planning tools and their applicability to occupational exposure at a fusion power

plant

F.Vermeersch

SCK•CEN

EFDA 27 juni 2006 EFDA monitoring meeting

Page 2: F.Vermeersch SCK•CEN

Investigate the applicability of 3D dose simulation tools for a fusion power plant

Operation Maintenance Decommissioning

Aim

Page 3: F.Vermeersch SCK•CEN

Context

• ALARA is part of the safety culture

• ALARA evaluation can be very complex

• 3D tools have shown their effectiveness in nuclear industry (fission)

• How can we apply this technology in the Fusion Power Plant environment

Page 4: F.Vermeersch SCK•CEN

Dose assessmentDose optimisation

• Dose assessment is currently based on average dose rates in an area.

• 3D simulation could be used to evaluate The effect of non-uniform dose distributions The introduction of shielding The effect of design changes The dose distribution in a changing

environment (maintenance, decommissioning)

Page 5: F.Vermeersch SCK•CEN

Can we apply this technology to occupational exposure in the

Fusion domain ?

• Method Identify typical exposure problems in a

fusion installation where this technology where can have an added value (literature study, discussion with designers).

Setting up a small application for demonstration.

Evaluate the in and output Evaluate the communication, education and

training aspects.

Page 6: F.Vermeersch SCK•CEN

Example Eq. Port 1

Page 7: F.Vermeersch SCK•CEN

Simplified Model of Eq.Port 1

Simplified source structure for demonstration

Sources include nose section beam line and port flange and port section

Page 8: F.Vermeersch SCK•CEN

Evolution of the radiation field during the maintenance work

Removal 5 mRemoval 3 m

Page 9: F.Vermeersch SCK•CEN

Evolution of the radiation field during the maintenance work

Nose section removedNose section shielded

Page 10: F.Vermeersch SCK•CEN

Dose uptake by the workers

Unshielded nose section

Page 11: F.Vermeersch SCK•CEN

Dose uptake by the workers

Nose section shielded by lead

Page 12: F.Vermeersch SCK•CEN

Dose uptake by the workers

Nose section removed

Page 13: F.Vermeersch SCK•CEN

Effect of shielding the port flange

Without shielding With shielding

Page 14: F.Vermeersch SCK•CEN

Dose uptake by the workers

Without shielding With shielding

Page 15: F.Vermeersch SCK•CEN

Next steps

• Better definition of the sources Better definition of the required information

• Simulation of the operation at eq. port 1

• Increase the detail of the model• Dose assessment for the whole

operation.• Suggestions for dose reduction

Page 16: F.Vermeersch SCK•CEN

Conclusion

• The use of simulation and 3D representation of the workplace and radiation risks enables A better communication during the pre-job ALARA

studies between the stakeholders. An implicit training of the ALARA analyst (more

scenarios can be tested) A better final preparation of the worker. A better awareness of the residual risk and the

radiation protection measures put into practice.