fy 2011 â€“ fy 2015 transportation improvement program - kipda

FY 2011 – FY 2015 Transportation Improvement Program

for the Louisville (KY‐IN) Metropolitan Planning Area: Clark & Floyd Counties, Indiana and

Bullitt, Jefferson, & Oldham Counties, Kentucky

Adopted October 7, 2010

FY 2011 - FY 2015

Transportation Improvement Program

For The

Louisville (KY-IN) Metropolitan Planning Area

October 2010

Available in Accessible Formats When Requested in Advance

Kentuckiana Regional Planning and Development Agency 11520 Commonwealth Drive Louisville, Kentucky 40299

502-266-6084 502-266-5047 FAX

800-962-8408 IN TDD 800-648-6056 KY TDD

Email: [email protected] Website: www.kipda.org

This report has been prepared in cooperation with or with financial assistance from all or several of the following public entities: Federal Transit Administration, Federal Highway Administration, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Indiana Department of Transportation, Transit Authority of River City, and local governments in the KIPDA region. This financial assistance notwithstanding, the contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the funding agencies. Accuracy of the information presented herein is the responsibility of the Kentuckiana Regional Planning and Development Agency, based upon project information submitted by sponsoring agencies.

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.kipda.org/

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION _________________________________________________________ 1

PROCESS _______________________________________________________________ 3

The TIP Process _______________________________________________________________________ 3

Project Priority _______________________________________________________________________ 3

Amendment Process __________________________________________________________________ 7

SAFETEA-LU Planning Factors ___________________________________________________________ 8

Participation Opportunities _____________________________________________________________ 9

Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan ______________________________ 12 Strategic Highway Safety Plan __________________________________________________________ 12

Americans With Disabilities Act _________________________________________________________ 13

Projects Implemented From Previous TIP _________________________________________________ 13

Intergovernmental Review Process ______________________________________________________ 16

Certification ________________________________________________________________________ 16

FUNDING _____________________________________________________________ 19

Surface Transportation __________________________________________________________________ 19

Transit _____________________________________________________________________________ 22

Federal Funds For Fiscal Years 2011 Through 2015 _________________________________________ 24

AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY _______________________________________________ 33

ENDORSED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS ______________________________ 38

Transit Improvements ________________________________________________________________ 38

Surface Transportation Improvements ___________________________________________________ 42

Indiana Projects _____________________________________________________________________ 45

Kentucky Projects ___________________________________________________________________ 111

COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF PROJECTS _______________________________________ 191

CHANGES IN PRIORITIES FROM PREVIOUS TIP _______________________________ 297 APPENDICES A Public Participation B Comprehensive Project List Sorted by State ID C Annual Listing of Obligated Projects D FY 2011 – FY 2015 TIP Projects from the Congestion Management System E FY 2011 – FY 2015 TIP Projects Supporting ITS Architecture F Glossary G Certifications/Letters of Approval

Introduction

Preface

The Kentuckiana Regional Planning and Development Agency (KIPDA) is the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for the Louisville urbanized area, which includes five counties in Kentucky and Indiana. The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is the funding mechanism for transportation projects requesting federal dollars in the Louisville urbanized area. All MPO’s are required by the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU) to produce a TIP and to update it at least every four years. This document contains a list of all surface transportation projects requesting the use of federal funds found in the SAFETEA-LU. All Transportation Improvement Program projects are consistent with the metropolitan transportation plan, Horizon 2030. The Transportation Improvement Program is required to be fiscally constrained. INDOT and KYTC submit projects to KIPDA for inclusion in the TIP based on the fiscally constrained Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).

Purpose of the TIP

The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a short-range program of highway and transit projects in the Louisville Metropolitan Planning Organization area and is prepared by KIPDA staff in cooperation with state and local agencies. The basic purpose of the TIP is to provide the mechanism for scheduling federal funds for surface transportation projects, indicate regional priorities, and demonstrate a short-range transportation vision for the area. The KIPDA Metropolitan Planning Organization area, as shown in Figure 1, includes Jefferson, Bullitt, and Oldham counties in Kentucky, and Clark and Floyd counties, and a portion of Harrison County in Indiana. A secondary purpose of the TIP is to provide information about other transportation projects in the urbanized area that are exempt from the TIP approval process such as projects that do not utilize federal funds.

1

Figure 1

2

Process

The TIP Process

The development of the TIP document is the responsibility of the Louisville urbanized area Metropolitan Planning Organization and provides an opportunity for local officials to determine priorities and spending for federal highway and transit funds. A transportation project located in the Louisville urbanized area and in ozone and PM 2.5 non-attainment areas must be included in the TIP prior to receiving federal funds. TIP projects must be included in the area's long range Metropolitan Transportation Plan, and are proposed for the TIP by local elected officials, transit operating officials, or state highway agencies. The TIP is reviewed and endorsed at least every four years by KIPDA's Transportation Policy Committee (TPC) and may be modified through either the TIP amendment process or administrative modification. The Transportation Policy Committee includes the chief elected officials of Bullitt County, Clark County, Charlestown, Clarksville, Floyd County, Jeffersontown, Jeffersonville, Louisville Metro, New Albany, Oldham County, Shively, St. Matthews and representatives of TARC, Regional Airport Authority, Jefferson County League of Cities, Indiana Department of Transportation and Kentucky Transportation Cabinet. After TPC endorsement, the TIP is submitted to the Indiana Department of Transportation and the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet for their approval and to the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration for federal review of the document.

Project Priority Projects that have been awarded Regional Priority status in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) are given preference when advancing from the Horizon 2030 Metropolitan Transportation Plan to the TIP. It is the intent of the Transportation Policy Committee to advance Regional Priority projects ahead of projects that do not have Regional Priority status. Both Indiana and Kentucky have in place additional processes used to identify schedules for advancing projects from the MTP to the TIP. Indiana uses the Program Development Process (PDP) while Kentucky utilizes its Unscheduled Projects List (UPL). In both instances, the states request local and regional input when identifying the higher priority projects and determining funding schedules. In Indiana, KIPDA participates in the INDOT PDP by communicating with INDOT staff about proposed projects. KIPDA staff and interested local officials attend Early Coordination meetings with INDOT and FHWA, and the INDOT public meeting held at the Seymour District office. In Kentucky, KIPDA takes part in the UPL process by participating in the problem identification process with evaluation of crash, congestion, and pavement condition data. KIPDA staff completes project identification forms for each problem

3

location that is identified. KIPDA staff and local officials participate in identifying local and regional priorities for the Kentucky Highway Plan and UPL. Both states are made aware of the projects that have been identified as Regional Priorities in the Transportation Plan. In Kentucky, where KIPDA is asked to recommend a numerical priority, those projects that have been awarded Regional Priority status will be recommended for a higher priority than those that do not. Determination of the numerical order of projects within those that are Regional Priorities will take place utilizing guidance provided from the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet. In Indiana, KIPDA provides input to INDOT, recommending that Regional Priorities be funded over other projects. KIPDA is responsible for setting priorities for several funding categories in the TIP. STP-Urban funds and CMAQ-Indiana funds are federal funds that are allocated to the MPO. New projects compete for the use of these funds through a project selection process which involves a priority scoring process. Projects applying for CMAQ-Kentucky funds are also scored using the project selection process as a means of prioritizing projects for recommendation to the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet. The Regional Priorities of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan, along with additional criteria serve as the foundation of the priority scoring process. The scoring process serves as a staff recommendation that is presented to the TTCC and subsequently considered by the TPC in their decision-making process. Each project requesting funding receives 1 point for each of the evaluation criteria. An additional means of scoring the projects involves reviewing the project delivery history of the project sponsors. If a project sponsor has had projects slip past the programmed year in the TIP, 1 to 4 points are deducted from the project’s score, depending on how many years it has slipped. The criteria are shown in Figure 2 for STP-Urban projects and Figure 3 for CMAQ funding. For the development of the FY 2011 – FY 2015 Transportation Improvement Program, the TTCC working group met on April 16, 2010 to review projects requesting Indiana STP-Urban funds and on April 21, 2010 to review the projects requesting Kentucky STP-Urban funds.

4

Figure 2

STP-Urban Priority Assessment

KIPDA PROJECT # __________

PROJECT NAME: ___________________________________________________

Louisville (KY-IN) Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program

STP-Urban Priority Assessment

Highway and Transit Projects

Score Priority Assessment Criteria Possible Points

Project is in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan 1

Regional Priority: Safety 1

Regional Priority: Congestion Management 1

Regional Priority: Travel Demand Management 1

Regional Priority: Air Quality 1

Regional Priority: Freight 1

Regional Priority: Alternate Modes 1

Located within 1/4 mile of an MTP Bicycle and Pedestrian Priority Corridor, and includes bicycle and/or pedestrian facilities. 1

Investment Area Agreement - project meets recommendation for Investment Area. 1

Maintenance of Existing System - project serves to maintain the existing system 1

Title VI/Environmental Justice Area Mitigation Project (as identified in the community Outreach & Assessment Program for the Louisville (KY-IN) MPA for Title VI/Environmental Justice & Other Communities of Concern document). 1

Existing TIP Project - project has other phases programmed in this and/or previous TIP years 1

Project improves access to, or use of, transit and rideshare 1

Project directly provides for an increase in transit ridership 1

Project provides for the net expansion of transit routes 1

Project Sponsor Project Delivery History - Within the last 4 years, if sponsor has had 1 project slip past the programmed year: -1 points; if 2 projects have slipped past the programmed year: -2 points; if 3 projects have slipped past the programmed year: -3 points; if 4 projects have slipped past the programmed year: -4 points. 0 to -4

TOTAL

5

Figure 3

CMAQ Priority Assessment

KIPDA PROJECT # __________

PROJECT NAME: ___________________________________________________

Louisville (KY-IN) Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program

CMAQ Priority Assessment

Highway & Transit Projects

Score Priority Assessment Criteria Possible Points

Project is in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan 1

Regional Priority: Safety 1

Regional Priority: Congestion Management 1

Regional Priority: Travel Demand Management 1

Regional Priority: Air Quality - project meets at least 1 CMAQ criteria. 1

Regional Priority: Freight 1

Regional Priority: Alternate Modes 1

Located within 1/4 mile of an MTP Bicycle and Pedestrian Priority Corridor, and includes bicycle and/or pedestrian facilities. 1

Investment Area Agreement - project meets recommendation for Investment Area. 1

Maintenance of Existing System - project serves to maintain the existing system 1

Title VI/Environmental Justice Area Mitigation Project 1

Existing TIP Project - project has other phases programmed in this and/or previous TIP years 1

Project is a mandated TCM or on the list of CAAA list of TCMs 1

Project is a diesel retrofit 1

Cost Benefit Analysis factor

Project Sponsor Project Delivery History - Within the last 4 years, if sponsor has had 1 project slip past the programmed year: -1 points; if 2 projects have slipped past the programmed year: -2 points; if 3 projects have slipped past the programmed year: -3 points; if 4 projects have slipped past the programmed year: -4 points. 0 to -4

TOTAL

6

Amendment Process

The TIP, as with any planning document, must recognize studied changes. Proposed changes must be reviewed and analyzed in a uniform manner, and this is achieved through the TIP amendment policy. The amendment process is intended to serve several major purposes, including meeting previously unforeseen needs and adding or deleting projects to/from the TIP. The amendment process applies to projects that meet any of the following conditions:

Add/Delete a project or phase(s) that requires a federal action (authorization) and is not eligible for an Administrative Modification.

Change in design concept and scope of the project.

Change in cost estimates that affect fiscal constraint.

Change that affects air quality conformity.

Change from non-federal to federal funds. There are times throughout the year when KIPDA is contacted by project sponsors concerning changes to projects. At that time, staff reviews the request and determines the appropriate action required to make the changes. There are several key criteria and steps that must be met and adhered to when amending the TIP, which include the following:

Projects must be reviewed for inclusion in the Transportation Plan.

Projects programmed with STP-Urban and Indiana CMAQ funds must be reviewed for fiscal constraint.

Since KIPDA is a non-attainment area for transportation related pollutants, any addition, deletion, or change to the scope of a regionally significant project which contributes to and/or reduces transportation related emissions, requires a regional emissions analysis to be completed and a new conformity determination by the FHWA, and FTA.

The public is afforded the opportunity to comment on the amendments and participation by interested citizens is sought as described in the KIPDA Participation plan.

Adoption by the Transportation Policy Committee.

Administrative Modifications In the event that a minor change is requested for a project in the TIP, it is possible that an Administrative Modification can be made. The following actions are eligible as Administrative Modifications to the STIP/TIP:

Correcting obvious minor data entry errors.

Splitting or combining projects without modifying the original project intent.

7

Changing or clarifying elements of a project description (with no change in funding). This change would not alter the original project intent.

Moving a project from one federal funding category to another.

Shifting the schedule of a project or phase within the years covered by the STIP/TIP (with no impact to fiscal constraint).

Adding Planning, Design, ROW or Utilities “phases” to a construction project that is already included in the STIP.

Moving any identified project phase programmed for previous year into a new TIP (rollover provision).

Updating project cost estimates (within the original project scope and intent) that do not impact fiscal constraint.

Administrative Modifications will be tracked by KIPDA staff and made available to appropriate committees. No resolution or action is required of the MPO. The MPO staff will also notify by letter or email all appropriate parties. Since Administrative Modifications are non-action items, this notification does not have to be presented to MPO committees prior to issue.

Rollover Provision The rollover provision allows movement of any identified project phase programmed for the previous year into a new TIP. When the TIP is adopted, project tables reflect funds expected to be obligated by the time the new TIP is in effect. However, it is normal for some projects or phases to be delayed. The rollover provision allows these projects to automatically move into the next year. Amendment Policy Exclusion Due to the number of amendments received in past years for minor operational improvements, local and state agencies may submit a single funding request for all years of the TIP which would provide for minor operational improvements such as: pavement markings; rail-safety projects; and resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation of roads. This policy will only apply to projects that are air quality exempt and not regionally significant. These projects can be listed in the TIP as “Various” with a general description of the type of improvement.

SAFETEA-LU Planning Factors

SAFETEA-LU requires that each metropolitan area consider the following eight factors when conducting transportation planning. These factors have been considered to the extent allowable in the development of the Transportation Improvement Program and the Horizon 2030 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Several projects and programs will directly and indirectly impact certain factors listed below.

8

1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency;

2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users;

3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users;

4. Increase accessibility and mobility of people and freight; 5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the

quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns;

6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight;

7. Promote efficient system management and operation; and, 8. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

The projects in the TIP are a subset of the Horizon 2030 Metropolitan Transportation Plan which was reviewed and evaluated with respect to many criteria, including the eight planning factors from SAFETEA-LU.

Participation Opportunities

KIPDA has developed a Participation Plan, the Transportation Planning Participation Plan for the Louisville (KY-IN) Metropolitan Planning Area, which was approved and adopted in April 2007. The plan outlines the methods utilized by the MPO to encourage and seek out comments from all interested parties in the region, including the use of visualization techniques (maps, graphics, PowerPoint presentations, etc.). In addition, the MPO consults with the following agencies: airport operations, conservation, economic development, freight movement, historic preservation, natural resources, non-emergency transportation services, recipients of assistance under Title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53, recipients of assistance under Section 504, and security operations. The plan complies with the participation guidelines included in the federal Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) and defined in the Federal Register for the Department of Transportation. Participation opportunities were provided according to the Transportation Planning Participation Plan, as well as the Community Assessment and Outreach Program for the Louisville (KY-IN) Metropolitan Planning Area for Title VI/Environmental Justice and other Communities of Concern (adopted 2004), to allow the public, agencies, and the private sector the chance to comment on the FY 2011 - FY 2015 Transportation Improvement Program. The public review period was held from August 6 through September 6, 2010. Notice of public review appeared in the Courier-Journal, the Louisville Defender, The Tribune, The Evening News, The Oldham Era, and The Pioneer News, and a press release was distributed. Notice was also sent to over 2500 citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of public transportation employees, freight shippers, providers of freight transportation services,

9

private providers of transportation, representatives of users of public transportation, representatives of users of pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities, representatives of the disabled, and other interested parties in Clark, Floyd, Bullitt, Oldham, and Jefferson counties. Copies of the TIP were made available at area public libraries, at the public meetings, on the KIPDA website, at KIPDA, and on the KIPDA blog, Facebook and Twitter sites. The TIP update was presented at the following venues:

August 12 – New Albany-Floyd County Public Library, 180 W. Spring St., New Albany, IN.

August 17 - John Black Community Center, 1551 North Highway 393, Buckner, KY

August 18 – NIA Center, 2900 W. Broadway, Louisville, KY

August 23 – Southwest Government Center, 7210 Dixie Highway, Louisville, KY

August 24 – Louisville Free Public Library Fairdale Branch, 10616 W. Manslick Road, Louisville, KY

August 26 – Republic Bank Community Room (in the building’s basement), 9600 Brownsboro Road, Louisville, KY

August 30 – Town of Clarksville Municipal Center’s Council Chambers, 2000 Broadway St., Clarksville, IN

August 31 – Paroquet Springs Conference Center’s Adam Shepherd Room, 395 Paroquet Springs Drive, Shepherdsville, KY

September 3 & 4 – WorldFest, the Belvedere, Louisville, KY

September 20 – Louisville Metro Mayor’s Community Conversation, Central High School, Louisville, KY

In addition to the review periods and meetings, there is a public comment item on the agenda at each Transportation Technical Coordinating Committee (TTCC) meeting and each Transportation Policy Committee (TPC) meeting where members of the public are invited to voice their concerns to committee members. This, in addition to the 30-day public review period, ensures that full and open access is provided to the MPO decision-making process. Disposition of Comments As stated in the Transportation Planning Participation Plan, KIPDA is committed to a process that ensures a wide variety of opportunities for the community to take an active role in the regional transportation planning process. The summary of comments comprised below illustrates the varied public opinion received from citizens of the Louisville (KY-IN) Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA). All comments are vital to the planning process and offer insights into what issues exist in the MPA. Following the close of the public review period, all comments were forwarded to TPC members for their consideration, and in addition, given explicit consideration by members of the TPC’s Public Comment Review Working Group.

10

Summary of Project/Physical Improvements-Specific Comments

Project issues identified in Public Comments

Support Oppose Examples of Projects in Response to the Comments

Intersection improvements 1 0 287

Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements 6 0 222, 282, 283, 188, 1804, 1442, 1444, 154, 359, 128, 446, 1271, 465, 1423, 1647, 1513,

Bridges 5 1 52, 185, 226

Increasing Roadway Capacity 6 0 446, 128, 465, 163, 1338, 321, 442

Advanced Transit 2 0 980, 977

Transit Improvements 1 0 1306

Sound barriers 2 0 1761,

Streetscape Improvements 3 0 446, 128, 465, 163, 1338

In addition, there were some comments received that requested further investigation into possible needs not identified in the plan. These comments related to adding additional lanes, bicycle lanes and turning lanes to existing roadways, adding traffic signals and street lights in various locations, as well as replacement of a bridge going from Clarksville, Indiana to New Albany, Indiana. Comment Consideration Following the close of each public review period, all comments in their entirety were compiled and forwarded to TPC members for their review and consideration for a period of 30 days prior to the TPC taking action on the draft FY 2011 – FY 2015 Transportation Improvement Program. Project specific comments were forwarded to the project’s sponsor for their review, consideration, and if appropriate, response. People submitting comments were sent an acknowledgement that their comment was received, as well as information explaining what happens to comments upon submission. TPC members had 30 days to review and consider public comment before action was taken following the public review period. In addition, a working group of the TPC further reviewed comments to ensure all comments received explicit consideration and to determine their significance. The Public Comment Review Working Group completed their responsibility during the TPC review period and presented their findings to the TPC with a report to the Chair. The 30-day TPC review period following the public review period provided TPC members with time to review comments, contact project sponsors, and collect additional information if deemed necessary prior to taking action on the final draft of the plan. Summary of Public Comment A summary of the public comments, copies of newspaper advertisements and new articles are included in Appendix A.

11

Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan

SAFETEA-LU established Human Services Transportation Coordination as a means of improving the coordination of transportation services for persons with disabilities, older adults, and individuals with lower incomes. In accordance with §450.306 (g), the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan (hereinafter referred to as the “Coordinated Plan”), as required by 49 USC Sections 5310, 5316, and 5317, is coordinated and consistent with the metropolitan planning process. KIPDA staff participated in the Coordinated Plan planning efforts led by the Transit Authority of River City (TARC). The Greater Louisville Region Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan was adopted on August 20, 2008 and amended January 13, 2010. As directed by SAFETEA-LU, projects selected to receive Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC), New Freedom, and Section 5310 funding must be derived from a coordinated human services public transportation plan. Projects in the Louisville and southern Indiana urbanized area are solicited and chosen through an open competitive selection process and must be based on the goals and priorities of the Greater Louisville Region Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan.

Strategic Highway Safety Plan

Safety is an element of SAFETEA-LU, and the transportation act directs states to develop Strategic Highway Safety Plans as a means of making highways safer. In accordance with SAFETEA-LU, both Kentucky and Indiana have developed Strategic Highway Safety Plans with goals to reduce the number of traffic fatalities and to reduce the severity of injuries resulting from highway crashes. The benefits of the Strategic Highway Safety Plan are to identify the State’s key safety needs, to guide decisions that will achieve significant reductions in highway fatalities and injuries, and to create partnerships and programs that will enable efficient and effective use of available resources. The goal for each state as represented in their respective and most current SHSP is as follows: “Reduce traffic fatalities to .98 per 100 Million-Vehicles Traveled (HMVMT) in 2008 and .92 HMVMT in 2010” – Indiana Strategic Highway Safety Plan, September 2006 “To reduce the number of highway fatalities to no more than 700 by December 31, 2008” – Kentucky Strategic Highway Safety Plan, September 2006 These goals have been incorporated into the Horizon 2030 Metropolitan Transportation Plan, and they are included in the TIP as directed by the Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Through implementation of funding programs such as INDOT’s sub-allocation of HSIP

12

dollars and through work with the KYTC District 5 Office to conduct Road Safety Audits, KIPDA is fully engaged in the effort to make highways in the region safer for not only those in the vehicles but also for pedestrians and cyclists as well.

Americans With Disabilities Act

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 requires transit systems to offer accessible fixed route service for people with disabilities. The ADA also mandates that transit systems provide complementary paratransit service for those who cannot use accessible fixed route service because of their disability. In addition to TARC’s fixed route transit service, which has been 100% accessible since 2000, special services for elderly and disabled persons are offered by TARC. TARC3 provides door-to-door demand responsive paratransit service and TARC goes beyond the ADA regulations by providing work trips to people with disabilities that may live outside of the regular ¾ mile access zone surrounding fixed route services. Finally, TARC’s Day-On-The-Town shuttle serves elderly persons who want to arrange for a minimum of ten people to travel on a shopping or recreational excursion during off-peak travel times.

Projects Implemented from Previous TIP

The list of projects shown in Table 1 reflects regionally significant projects from the FY 2007 – FY 2011 TIP that have been completed and opened to the public. The list also shows regionally significant projects that have experienced a significant delay in implementation. A significant delay has been determined to be a change in air quality analysis years.

13

Table 1

Projects Implemented/Significant Delay from

FY 2007 - FY 2011 Transportation Improvement Program

KIPDA ID Project State ID Project Description

Project Sponsor

Project Implemented Significant Delay

Indiana Projects

1557 10th Street 0810280

Phase 3: Reconstruct and widen 10th Street from 4 to 5 lanes (5th lane will be a center turn lane) from Dutch Lane/Penn Street to Reeds Lane. Jeffersonville

Change Open to Public date from 2012 TO 2015

1003 I- 64 0500307

Widen I-64 from 5 to 6 lanes from I-265 to IN 111. Additional east bound lane between southbound I-265 and IN 111. Approximately 1.2 miles. INDOT


1244 I- 64 0101102 Interchange modification on I-64 at IN 62 and IN 64, adding turn lanes. INDOT X

1523 I- 65 0501157 Paint I-65 (Indiana approach bridge) bridge over the Ohio River. INDOT X

348 I- 65, Exit 1 Park & Ride 0012600

Construction of Park & Ride lot and provision of transit service at I-65, Exit 1, including railroad construction Jeffersonville X

1098 IN 60 0100713 Intersection improvement on IN 60 at Saint Joe Road (west junction) INDOT Deleted

1104 IN 60 0100712 Intersection improvement on IN 60 at Saint Joe Road (east junction). INDOT Deleted

1565 IN 60 0711017 Intersection improvement at Perry Crossing Road including the addition of turn lanes. INDOT


312 IN 62 9902650

Intersection improvement on IN 62 at Decker Lane; an 8 ft. paved shoulder added to IN 62. A passing blister will be constructed along IN 62 opposite the Decker Road intersection. Decker Road approach will be improved. INDOT X

313 IN 62 9902690

Intersection improvement on IN 62 at Vesta Road/Oscar Long Road. Center left turn lane added and right turn lane eastbound into Vesta Road. INDOT X

314 IN 62 9902700

Intersection improvement on IN 62 at Brook Road/Bull Creek Road. Adding right turn lane for each intersection and extending them past intersection to form a passing blister for the opposite intersection. INDOT X

587 IN 62 9902740

Sight distance correction on IN 62 from Salem Church Road/Dave Carr Road to Sycamore Drive. The Dave Carr Road intersection will be shifted east and line up with Salem Church Road. Left turn lanes will be added on IN 62 at Dave Carr Road, Salem Church Road and Sycamore Drive. Includes 2 intersection improvements: IN 62 at Vesta /Oscar Long Road and IN 62 at Brook Road/Bull Creek Road. INDOT X

59 IN 64 8347950

Replace bridge on IN 64 over Georgetown Creek, 4.3 miles west of I-64. The project's total length is 0.133 miles. Roadway approaches will provide for two 12-foot lanes with 6-foot shoulders. INDOT X

1238 Lewis & Clark Parkway 0300447

Intersection improvement on Lewis and Clark Parkway at Brown Station Way, includes bridge removal. INDOT

Change Open to Public date from 2009 to 2012

514

Veterans Parkway, Phase 2 0500176

Phase 2: Widen Charlestown-New Albany Pike from 2 to 4 lanes from Veterans Parkway to Holman Lane. Widen Holman Lane from 2 to 4 lanes from IN 62 to Charlestown-New Albany Pike. Jeffersonville

Change Open to Public date from 2010 to 2015

Kentucky Projects

1275 Bear Camp Road 1044.00

Replace bridge on Bear Camp Road over Bear Camp Run (C08). KYTC X

1452 Bernheim Forest Trail Construction of new nature trail in Bernheim Forest. Bullitt Co X

1499 Brownsboro Farm Pathway

Construction of a 650 ft. pedestrian path to provide access to the city park.

Brownsboro Farm X

14

Table 1 (continued)

Projects Implemented/Significant Delay from

FY 2007 - FY 2011 Transportation Improvement Program

222 Cooper Chapel Phase 1 403.00

Phase 1: Reconstruct Cooper Chapel Road from 2 to 3 lanes (3rd lane will be a center turn lane) from KY 61 to Smyrna Parkway. Project length is 1.8 miles. Lou. Metro


188 English Station Road 353.00

Widen English Station Road from 2 to 3 lanes (3rd lane will be a center turn lane) from Aiken Road to Avoca Road. Lou. Metro


1407 Grade Lane Connector 306.00

Construction of bridge and approaches over I-65 from Grade Lane to Lotus Avenue. KYTC X

1398 Hybrid Bus Upgrade

Purchase of 4 hybrid electric buses manufactured by the Gillig Corp. through "piggyback" options available from the Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky TARC X

350 I-64 65.00

Widen I-64 from 4 to 6 lanes from I-265 (Gene Snyder Freeway) to the KY 53 interchange in Shelby County. (Project cost reflects Jefferson County portion only.) KYTC


181 I- 64 / KY 1747 Interchange

Reconstruct existing interchange including construct ramp 7 "flyover" from northbound KY 1747 (Hurstbourne Parkway) to westbound I-64 and re-time signals along KY 1747 (Hurstbourne Parkway). KYTC


1462 I-65 288.00 Improve I-65/KY 1526 (Brooks Road) interchange as recommended by KIPDA's interchange study. KYTC X

1483 I-265 264.00

Improve I-265/US 31E (Bardstown Road) interchange as recommended by KIPDA's interchange study including the addition of 1 southbound lane on Bardstown Road from the Kroger Driveway to the I-265 westbound on-ramp and 1 northbound lane from Bates Elementary to the I-265 westbound on-ramp. KYTC


1484 I-265 266.00

Improve the I-265 / KY 155 (Taylorsville Road) interchange. Project will not include additional travel lanes but will include restriping to allow an additional 300' storage lane on the SB off ramp. KYTC X

1464

Jeffersontown Bike/Ped Stone Bridge Restoration

Restore double arch stone bridge on Old Taylorsville Road over Chenoweth Run Stream, including a bike lane and sidewalks, landscaping, and a bike/ped map. KYTC X

1492 KY 53 185.00 Add new auxiliary right lane on KY 53 from I-71 ramp to New Moody Lane. KYTC X

1399 KY 155 902.00

Construct left turn lane on KY 155 at Tucker Station Road and add a short section of EB travel lane on KY 155, 0.9 mile northwest of I-265 underpass in Louisville. KYTC X

1448 KY 155 241.00 Extend left turn lanes on WB KY 155 (Taylorsville Road) at Hurstbourne Lane (KY 1747). KYTC X

1490 KY 480 391.00

Widen KY 480 from 3 to 5 lanes (3rd lane is presently a center turn lane--project adds a travel lane in each direction) from I-65 to the Industrial Park (Omega Parkway in Cedar Grove Business Center), from 3 to 4 lanes from the Industrial Park (Omega Parkway in Cedar Grove Business Center) to Cedar Grove Elementary School, and from 2 to 3 lanes (3rd lane will be a center turn lane) from Cedar Grove Elementary School to Valley View Drive. KYTC


151 KY 1447 28.10

Widen KY 1447 (Westport Road) from 2 to 5 lanes (5th lane will be a center turn lane) from Hubbards Lane to I-264 (Henry Watterson Expressway). KYTC X

1469

KY 61 Corridor Beautification Project Artwork for the KY 61 (Preston Street) railroad overpass.

Lou. Metro Dev. Auth. X

1200 Oak Street 402.30 Replace bridge on Oak Street over South Fork of Beargrass Creek. X

1267 Phillips Lane Widen Phillips Lane from 2 to 4 lanes with median from KY 61 (Preston Highway) to KY 1631 (Crittenden Drive).


1271 US 42 441.00

Reconstruct US 42 and widen from 2 lanes to 3 lanes (3rd lane will be a center turn lane) from Jefferson/Oldham County line to Ridgemoor Drive. Project will include the consideration of improvements to the Hayfield Way intersection.


15

Report of Obligated Projects

KIPDA publishes an annual listing of projects obligated in the preceding year. This list is developed cooperatively by the states, public transportation operator, and the MPO. The Report of Obligated Projects is published as a separate document and made available for public review in accordance with the Participation Plan. This report is shown in Appendix C.

Intergovernmental Review Process

The TIP assists in meeting the federal intergovernmental review requirements for transportation projects recommended for federal funding during the upcoming year. This review provides for coordination of federal, state and local programs. Summary project information for federal-aid projects in the Annual Element is submitted to the Kentucky Department of Local Government State Clearinghouse and the Indiana State Budget Agency for processing. Also submitted to the Indiana State Budget Agency is an assurance that the TIP was developed with and reviewed by the appropriate jurisdictions and governmental agencies within the Louisville urbanized area. Certification

Federal regulations require that the Indiana Department of Transportation, the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, and KIPDA self-certify that the transportation planning process is addressing the major issues in the metropolitan planning area in accordance with: 23 U.S.C. 134, 49 U.S.C. 5303, and this subpart; sections 174 and 176 (c) and (d) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42U.S.C. 7504, 7506 (c) and (d)) and 40CFR part 93; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000d–1) and 49 CFR part 21; 49 U.S.C. 5332, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or age in employment or business opportunity; Section 1101(b) of the SAFETEA–LU (Pub. L. 109–59) and 49 CFR part 26 regarding the involvement of disadvantaged business enterprises in USDOT funded projects; 23 CFR part 230, regarding the implementation of an equal employment opportunity program on Federal and Federal-aid highway construction contracts; the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) and 49 CFR parts 27, 37, and 38; the Older Americans Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101), prohibiting discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance; Section 324 of Title 23 U.S.C. regarding the prohibition of discrimination based on gender; and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and 49 CFR part 27 regarding discrimination against individuals with disabilities. Signed certifications assuring compliance with applicable federal regulations are included in Figures 4 and 5. The Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration conducted the most recent certification review of KIPDA’s urban transportation planning process on May 24-26, 2006. On August 10, 2006, they determined that the planning process substantially meets the requirements of 23 CFR 450 Subpart C.

16

Funding

SAFETEA-LU identifies federal funding sources for road, highway, transit, and other transportation related improvements. The key aspect of SAFETEA-LU is its flexibility of funds, empowerment of local jurisdictions in assigning project priorities, public participation to a greater extent in planning and decision making, and conformity to air quality standards and fiscal constraint.

Surface Transportation

Four basic categories of surface transportation funds are available through the Federal Highway Administration. These funds exist to meet specific purposes identified in SAFETEA-LU. This act authorizes federal assistance for both highway and transit programs and provides for motor fuels tax revenues. Appropriations from the general fund are provided by separate legislation. The United States Department of Transportation, the Economic Development Administration, the Department of the Interior, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development provide additional sources for transportation funding. National Highway System-FHWA

The National Highway System (NHS) focuses on transportation facilities that are of national significance and have direct impact on the interstate system. The NHS includes all of the interstates and those portions of primary, secondary and urban facilities that provide access to interstates, major transportation centers, and national defense facilities. NHS funds may also be used for the construction of facilities and the maintenance of the interstate system. On a national scale, a maximum of 155,000 miles of roadway have been designated for the NHS system. Responsibility for setting priority of projects requesting NHS funds that are submitted to the TIP rests with the state departments of transportation from Kentucky and Indiana. Federal funds may pay 80% - 90% of project costs depending on the type of improvements. Interstate construction and interstate maintenance are eligible to receive 90% federal obligation for a project. All other NHS projects are eligible for an 80% federal share. Surface Transportation Program-FHWA

The Surface Transportation Program (STP) is a funding category whose intent is to give more funding discretion to the states and the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), in this case KIPDA. STP funds may be used on any surface transportation project, including those on the NHS, and excluding local or rural minor collectors. Facilities meeting this criterion are referred to as Federal-aid roads. Funds under STP, following the completion of certain criteria, may be transferred to specific transit funding programs. Those transferred funds will then follow the guidelines of the program to which they were transferred. From the federal money allocated to a state for distribution through STP, 10% is earmarked for the Transportation Enhancement Program. Of the 90% of the remaining federal funds

19

allocated to a state for the STP funding category, 62.5% is to be distributed to census defined urbanized areas having a population equal to or greater than 200,000. If an area meets this criterion, then it is referred to as a Transportation Management Area (TMA). Therefore, projects within the Louisville TMA may utilize these funds. Urbanized and rural areas with a population below 200,000 or areas that are not urbanized will receive 37.5% of the 90%. Priority setting for STP monies differs from that of NHS monies. STP money, allocated to the Louisville urbanized area, is to be obligated on a priority basis that is determined by the MPO in consultation with the state's respective Department of Transportation, in this case either the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet or the Indiana Department of Transportation. Under SAFETEA-LU, each state is to abide by the funding program for STP dollars designated to the urbanized area. STP monies obligated to the areas outside a TMA are to be spent at the discretion of the state department of transportation. Projects that request money from the Transportation Enhancement Program are to be obligated according to the state's discretion in consultation with the MPO and their recommended priority. The Transportation Enhancement Program provides for the implementation of non-traditional transportation projects that enhance the aesthetic quality of a project or area. Transportation Enhancement funds may be utilized to fund the following types of projects:

provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles,

provision of safety and educational activities for pedestrians and bicyclists,

acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites,

scenic or historic highway programs,

landscaping and other scenic beautification,

historic preservation,

rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures or facilities including historic railroad facilities and canals,

preservation of abandoned railway corridors,

control and removal of outdoor advertising,

archeological planning and research,

mitigation of water pollution due to highway run-off or to reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity, and

establishment of transportation museums. All STP monies other than those used for interstate construction or interstate maintenance projects receive an 80% federal obligation toward the cost of each project. STP monies used for interstate completion and interstate maintenance receive a 90% federal match. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program-FHWA

Projects and programs that assist in the attainment or maintenance of standards for air quality outlined in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 are eligible to use Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) funds. Eligible projects must:

contribute to the attainment or maintenance of a national ambient air quality standard; or

20

be an element of a strategy that will contribute to the attainment or maintenance of a national ambient air quality standard.

In Kentucky, the MPO recommends priorities for their non-attainment/maintenance area and the responsibility for determining final priorities for funding rests with the state. In Indiana, the responsibility for setting priority for CMAQ funds sub-allocated to the non-attainment/maintenance areas rests with the MPO. CMAQ monies typically receive an 80% federal obligation toward the cost of each project. Highway Safety Improvement Program-FHWA

SAFETEA-LU established a new program of funding dedicated to highway safety. These are federal funds aimed at reducing traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. Each state will receive at least one-half of one percent of the funds apportioned for the Highway Safety Improvement Program. Responsibility for setting priority for Highway Safety Improvement Program projects in Kentucky rests with the state, and in Indiana, INDOT sub-allocates funds to the MPOs. The federal share of all Highway Safety Improvement Program projects is 90%.

Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation-FHWA

Federal funds are available for the rehabilitation and replacement of bridges through the Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation funding category. Responsibility for setting priorities for Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation projects rests with the state. The federal share of all Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation projects is 80%. Minimum Guarantee-FHWA

Minimum Guarantee funds are distributed to ensure that each state will have a guaranteed return on its contribution to the Highway Account of the Highway Trust Fund. Each state is guaranteed a certain share of the aggregate funding for the following programs: Interstate Maintenance, National Highway System, Bridge, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement, Surface Transportation Program, Metropolitan Planning, High Priority Projects, Appalachian Development Highway System, Recreational Trails, and Minimum Guarantee. Of the Minimum Guarantee Funds made available, $2.8 billion is administered as though it were STP funding except that the STP provisions requiring set-aside of funds for safety and transportation enhancements and sub-State allocation of funds do not apply. Within each state, the amount of funds above $2.8 billion is divided among the IM, NHS, Bridge, CMAQ, and STP programs based on the share the state received for each program under the program formula.

21

Interstate Maintenance - FHWA

Federal funds are available for the maintenance of the interstate and its bridges through the Interstate Maintenance funds. Responsibility for setting priority for Interstate Maintenance projects rests with each state. The federal share of all Interstate Maintenance projects is 90 percent. Transportation, Community, and System Preservation Program - FHWA

The Transportation, Community, and System Preservation Program (TCSP) was established to address the relationships among transportation, community, and system preservation plans and practices. Eligible projects include those that improve the efficiency of the transportation system, reduce impacts of transportation on the environment, reduce the need for costly future investments in public infrastructure, provide efficient access to jobs, services, and centers of trade, and examine community development patterns and identify strategies to encourage private sector development. TCSP projects are selected for funding by the U.S. Department of Transportation. The federal share of all TCSP projects is 80 percent. Safe Routes to School Program - FHWA

The Safe Routes to School Program was established to enable and encourage children to walk and bicycle to school. This funding helps to facilitate the planning, development and implementation of projects that not only improve safety, but also reduce traffic, fuel consumption, and air pollution in the vicinity of schools. These federal funds are apportioned to the states based on their share of total enrollment in primary and middle schools. States must set-aside between 10 and 30 percent of the Safe Routes to School Program funding for non-infrastructure related activities to encourage walking and bicycling to school, such as public awareness campaigns and outreach to press and community leaders, traffic education and enforcement in the vicinity of schools, student sessions on bicycle and pedestrian safety, health, and environment, and training. Projects are chosen for funding by the state departments of transportation. The federal share of Safe Routes to Schools Program projects is 100 percent.

Transit

Federal grants for public transportation programs are authorized by the Federal Transit Act Amendments of 1991. Section 5309-FTA

Section 5309 funds can be used for a variety of transit capital investments the primary use is for major one-time investments in mass transit systems and for the construction of completely new systems. Section 5309 funds are available to local transit programs on a nationally competitive basis. The federal share of Section 5309 projects is 80 percent.

22

Section 5307-FTA

Section 5307 is a formula-apportioned aid program available for planning and capital assistance for urbanized areas with populations greater than 50,000. In urbanized areas with populations of 200,000 or more the definition of capital has been revised to include preventive maintenance. Responsibility for setting project priorities within a TMA rests with the MPO. In areas outside the TMA, project priority is the responsibility of the state. Section 5310-FTA

The Section 5310 program provides capital assistance to private nonprofit corporations and associations in the purchase of vehicles and related equipment to transport elderly and disabled persons. This program provides up to 80 percent of the costs of purchasing equipment. Project priority is approved by KIPDA within the transportation management area and funding is administered by the states. The funds are awarded on a competitive basis depending upon the severity of the needs of the persons to be served, the availability of existing transportation resources and other factors. In areas outside the TMA, project priority is the responsibility of the state. Section 5311-FTA

FTA Section 5311 funds are available for capital and operating assistance to public transportation projects in areas other than urbanized (small urban, rural, and inter-city). The federal share of costs is up to 80 percent for capital projects and 50 percent for operating expenses. Section 5311 funds are apportioned to states by a legislatively determined formula based on non-urban population. These funds remain available for two years after apportionment, after which they are reapportioned among the states under the Section 5311 program. Outside the TMA, project priority is the responsibility of the state. Section 5316-FTA: Job Access and Reverse Commute

FTA Section 5316 funds are commonly known as Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) funds. These federal funds are available for local programs that offer job access and reverse commute services to provide transportation for low income individuals who may live in the city core and work in suburban locations. This funding is allocated based on the number of low income persons. Ten percent of these funds may be used for planning, administration and technical assistance. Projects are selected by the states and designated recipients. Selected projects must be included in the human service transportation coordinated plan. Section 5317-FTA: New Freedom Program

FTA’s New Freedom Program, Section 5317 funds are federal formula funds based on the population of persons with disabilities. These funds encourage services and facility improvements to address the transportation needs of persons with disabilities. Ten percent of these funds may be used for planning, administration and technical assistance. Projects are

23

selected by the states and designated recipients. Selected projects must be included in the human service transportation coordinated plan. Other Funds

In 1976, the Kentucky General Assembly appropriated funds to allow the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet to begin matching public transportation capital grants. Since that time, KYTC has been able to provide up to half of the nonfederal share of capital costs, within budgetary limitations. All transit systems operating in Kentucky are requested to annually review their capital equipment needs for the coming three-year period. The resulting Kentucky Public Transportation Capital Improvement Program is used as the basis for awarding state funds. The Indiana Department of Transportation provides funds from the Public Mass Transportation Fund to match federal transit grants. Created in 1980, the fund is derived from a dedication of .76 percent of the state's 5 percent general sales and use taxes. The state helps provide up to two-thirds of the nonfederal share required to match a federal capital or operating grant by matching up to 100 percent of locally derived income up to the allocation amount. State funds are allocated each calendar year by a performance-based formula. Awards are limited to an amount equal to 100 percent of the projects' locally derived income or the system's formula allocation, whichever is less. Local funding for TARC is provided by a one-fifth of one percent occupation tax approved by the voters of Louisville and Jefferson County on November 4, 1974. The occupational tax became legally effective on January 1, 1975, and can be used by TARC for operating and capital matching funds.

Federal Funds for Fiscal Years 2011 Through 2015

Federal funds are available for programming in the TIP in two basic formats. The first are those funds that are sub-allocated to the Louisville urbanized and non-attainment area; and the second are those funds that are utilized on a statewide level and are competitive between projects and jurisdictions throughout the state. Both Kentucky and Indiana receive federal funds for their respective states, some of which are sub-allocated to the Louisville urbanized area and others are available statewide. The transportation act requires that all plan documents, including the Transportation Improvement Program be fiscally constrained. There should not be more dollars scheduled for programming in the Transportation Improvement Program than there are dollars available. KIPDA is responsible for programming all federal projects in the TIP. For those federal funds that are not sub-allocated to the Louisville urbanized area, a reasonable estimate of funds that may be obligated is to be made by the states.

24

Most of the federal funding categories used for funding projects operate at the state's discretion. The projects requesting these funding sources originate from the states, but still require final approval for use through the Transportation Policy Committee's TIP approval process.

Surface Transportation Program-Urban

In the project listings of the TIP, Surface Transportation Program-Urban funds for Kentucky and Indiana are identified as "STP-Urban". In accordance with SAFETEA-LU, each urbanized area with a population greater than 200,000 is classified as a Transportation Management Area (TMA). TMAs are allocated a portion of the state's allocation of Surface Transportation Program dollars. Each area's portion is determined by a formula based on a population factor. The MPO designates how these funds will be used. KIPDA is a bi-state MPO and each state's portion of the urbanized area provides STP-Urban dollars for their respective state.

Indiana

The Indiana Department of Transportation has estimated that $2,768,535 will be allocated to the urbanized area for each of FY 2011, FY 2012, FY 2013, FY 2014, and FY 2015. The Indiana Department of Transportation allows the MPO’s to total four years of funds and program those funds within the TIP four-year period. Figure 6 provides a breakdown of STP-Urban funds by project type with 96% being programmed for road projects. The financial plan in Table 2 shows the amount of STP-Urban funds programmed for Clark and Floyd counties.

FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Annual Allocation $2,768,535 $2,768,535 $2,768,535 $2,768,535 $2,768,535

Carryover From Previous Year $1,495,009 $1,881,544 $624,455 $726,273 $367,808

Balance of Funds Available $4,263,544 $4,650,079 $3,392,990 $3,494,808 $3,136,343

Dollars Programmed $2,382,000 $4,025,624 $2,666,717 $3,127,000 $3,127,000

Balance Remaining $1,881,544 $624,455 $726,273 $367,808 $9,343

Surface Transportation Program

Table 2Financial Plan of

Indiana STP-Urban Funds

25

Kentucky

The Kentucky Transportation Cabinet has estimated that $13,700,000 will be allocated to the urbanized area for each of FY 2011, FY 2012, FY 2013, FY 2014, and FY 2015. Table 3 shows the financial plan for the Kentucky STP-Urban dollars in the TIP. The percentage of Kentucky STP-Urban funds programmed for road projects is 86%, while 9% is programmed for stand-alone bicycle and pedestrian projects, and 5% is programmed for transit, as shown in Figure 7.

.

Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality

In the project listing of the TIP, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds are identified as "CMAQ". The CMAQ dollars are intended solely for projects and programs that will improve air quality in those areas designated as non-attainment or as maintenance areas for air pollutants. These dollars are intended to work closely with the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and can be used only on projects that are able to demonstrate positive air quality benefits and do not add capacity for single-occupant-vehicles. Locally, Clark and Floyd counties in Indiana and Bullitt, Jefferson, and Oldham counties in Kentucky are designated as a maintenance area for the 8-hour ozone standard. Clark and Floyd counties and Madison Township of Jefferson County in Indiana, and Bullitt and Jefferson counties in Kentucky are designated as a non-attainment area for the annual PM2.5 standard.

FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Annual Al location $13,700,000 $13,700,000 $13,700,000 $13,700,000 $13,700,000

Carryover From Previous Year $25,566,471 $8,552,478 $985,802 $323,420 $2,438,622

Balance of Funds Avai lable $39,266,471 $22,252,478 $14,685,802 $14,023,420 $16,138,622

Dol lars Programmed $30,713,993 $21,266,676 $14,362,382 $11,584,798 $16,120,588

Balance Remaining $8,552,478 $985,802 $323,420 $2,438,622 $18,034

Table 3

Financial Plan of

Kentucky STP-Urban

Surface Transportation Program

26

Indiana

The state of Indiana sub-allocates the CMAQ dollars it receives to each non-attainment or maintenance area. The southern Indiana area is sub-allocated approximately $975,000 each year. The financial plan of Indiana CMAQ funds for FY 2011 and FY 2012 is shown in Table 4. A call for projects has not been issued for FY 2013, FY 2014, or FY 2015.

FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Annual Allocation $974,850 $974,850 $974,850 $974,850 $974,850

Carryover From Previous Year $2,112,860 $342,710 $417,560 $0 $0

Balance of Funds Available $3,087,710 $1,317,560 $1,392,410 $974,850 $974,850

Dollars Programmed $2,745,000 $900,000 $0 $0 $0

Balance Remaining $342,710 $417,560 $1,392,410 $974,850 $974,850

Note: A call for CMAQ projects has not yet been held for FY 2013, FY 2014, or FY 2015.

Table 4Financial Plan of

Indiana CMAQ Funds

Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality

Kentucky

The state of Kentucky does not sub-allocate CMAQ dollars to non-attainment or maintenance areas. Projects from all of these areas in the state compete with each other to receive funds. KIPDA submits applications to the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet for review. Once projects are selected for funding by the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, those projects will be added to the Transportation Improvement Program.

Transportation Enhancement

Transportation Enhancement (TE) dollars are to be used on projects that are transportation related, and do not necessarily impact the flow of travel on roadways. SAFETEA-LU has identified many categories of uses ranging from bicycle and pedestrian facilities, to landscaping along roadways, to historic preservation of transportation related facilities, to archeological planning and research conducted in relation to a transportation project. Each state has formed a committee of agencies which reviews the projects submitted to the state and rank them against each other using state-established criteria. Agencies on the state review committee generally include, at a minimum, state historic preservation organizations, tourism commissions, and state departments of transportation. Applications from Clark and Floyd counties are submitted to KIPDA, prioritized as a recommendation to the state, and then forwarded to the Indiana Department of

27

Transportation for review by the Transportation Enhancement committee and governor. Applications from Bullitt, Jefferson, and Oldham counties are submitted directly to the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet for review by the Transportation Enhancement committee and governor. Due to the inability of the states to provide a forecast of how many TE dollars will be spent in our urbanized area, future TE projects are not included in the TIP endorsed list of projects. Once projects are selected for funding by each governor, those projects will be added to the Transportation Improvement Program.

Highway Safety Improvement Program – Indiana

Beginning in FY 2010, the Indiana Department of Transportation sub-allocates Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds to the Clark and Floyd counties. These are federal funds to be used for safety improvements on local public roads maintained by counties, cities, and towns. The program is designed to fund projects that reduce the number and severity of highway related crashes and to decrease the potential for crashes on all highways. KIPDA receives approximately $280,000 annually for this program. The Indiana Department of Transportation issues an annual call for applications for this funding. Applications from Clark and Floyd counties are submitted to KIPDA and then forwarded to the Indiana Department of Transportation for an eligibility finding. After projects are determined to be eligible for the funds, they are prioritized and reviewed for inclusion in the Transportation Improvement Program. At this time, projects are currently under review for the use of these funds. Financial Plan of Funds A financial plan of federal funds that are programmed in the TIP for FY 2011 through FY 2015 is shown in Table 5. These estimates of funds are based on the project costs, which are supplied by the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Indiana Department of Transportation, TARC, and other project sponsors. Not all state funded projects are required to be included in the TIP; therefore state funds are not included in this table. A requirement of SAFETEA-LU is to reflect the Transportation Improvement Program in Year of Expenditure. As the term implies, Year of Expenditure involves adjusting project costs and revenues in the TIP so that they reflect anticipated dollar amounts in the year in which they are scheduled to be expended. Projects in the FY 2011 – FY 2015 Transportation Improvement Program have been adjusted for Year of Expenditure using adjustment factors developed in consultation with the Indiana Department of Transportation and the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet. At the time that this document went to print, the Kentucky General Assembly had only approved projects for FY 2011 and FY 2012 from the 2010 Kentucky Highway Plan. It is anticipated that additional projects will be added to the Transportation Improvement Program as they are approved. In Indiana, the planning process is on-going and additional projects will be added as they are identified.

28

Table 5 FY 2011 – FY 2015 Transportation Improvement Program

Financial Plan of Federal Funds Indiana

FY 2011

Programmed Project Cost

Federal Funding Category Projected Revenue Federal Funds

State/Local Match


Bridge $625,000 $500,000 $125,000 $625,000 CMAQ $3,087,710 $2,620,000 $50,000 $2,670,000 CMAQ-State $110,000 $88,000 $22,000 $110,000 HSIP $280,000 $0 $0 $0 IM $4,847,750 $4,312,975 $534,775 $4,847,750 NHS $5,967,000 $4,773,600 $1,193,400 $5,967,000 Safety $1,175,000 $1,050,000 $125,000 $1,175,000 Section 5310 $129,000 $103,200 $25,800 $129,000 STP-State $50,175,700 $40,268,000 $9,907,700 $50,175,700 STP-Urban $5,329,430 $2,382,000 $595,500 $2,977,500 TE $0 $0 $0 $0

Total $71,726,590 $56,097,775 $12,579,175 $68,676,950

FY 2012



State/Local Match


Bridge $625,000 $500,000 $125,000 $625,000 CMAQ * $1,317,560 $900,000 $225,000 $1,125,000 HSIP $280,000 $0 $0 $0 IM $1,250,000 $1,100,000 $150,000 $1,250,000 NHS $12,324,000 $9,859,200 $2,464,800 $12,324,000 Safety $625,000 $500,000 $125,000 $625,000 STP-State $2,000,000 $1,600,000 $400,000 $2,000,000 STP-Urban $5,812,599 $4,025,624 $881,406 $4,907,030 TE * $0 $0 $0 $0

Total $24,234,159 $18,484,824 $4,371,206 $22,856,030

FY 2013



State/Local Match


Bridge $625,000 $500,000 $125,000 $625,000 CMAQ * $1,392,410 $0 $0 $0 HSIP $280,000 $0 $0 $0 IM $250,000 $200,000 $50,000 $250,000 NHS $1,500,000 $1,200,000 $300,000 $1,500,000 Safety $625,000 $500,000 $125,000 $625,000 STP-State $2,200,000 $1,761,200 $438,800 $2,200,000 STP-Urban $4,241,238 $2,666,717 $666,679 $3,333,396 TE * $0 $0 $0 $0

Total $11,113,648 $6,827,917 $1,705,479 $8,533,396

29

Table 5 (Continued)

FY 2011 – FY 2015 Transportation Improvement Program Financial Plan of Federal Funds

Indiana

FY 2014

Federal Funding Category


Projected Revenue Federal Funds State/Local

Match Programmed Project

Cost

Bridge $625,000 $500,000 $125,000 $625,000 CMAQ * $974,850 $0 $0 $0 HSIP $280,000 $0 $0 $0 IM $63,850,000 $57,440,000 $6,410,000 $63,850,000 NHS $32,300,000 $25,840,000 $6,460,000 $32,300,000 Safety $625,000 $500,000 $125,000 $625,000 STP-State $41,315 $33,052 $8,263 $41,315 STP-Urban $4,368,510 $3,127,000 $781,750 $3,908,750 TE * $0 $0 $0 $0

Total $103,064,675 $87,440,052 $13,910,013 $101,350,065

FY 2015

Federal Funding Category


Projected Revenue Federal Funds State/Local

Match Programmed Project

Cost

Bridge $625,000 $500,000 $125,000 $625,000 CMAQ * $974,850 $0 $0 $0 HSIP $280,000 $0 $0 $0 IM $250,000 $200,000 $50,000 $250,000 Safety $625,000 $500,000 $125,000 $625,000 STP-State $1,000 $800 $200 $1,000 STP-Urban $3,920,429 $3,127,000 $781,750 $3,908,750 TE * $0 $0 $0 $0

Total $6,676,279 $4,327,800 $1,081,950 $5,409,750

* These funds are programmed annually, therefore, projected revenue and project costs are not known at this time. Additional projects could be programmed

30

Table 5 (Continued)


Kentucky

FY 2011



State/Local Match**


Bridge $625,000 $500,000 $125,000 $625,000

CMAQ $2,622,839 $2,098,251 $524,588 $2,622,839

HPP $15,400,000 $15,400,000 $0 $15,400,000

IM $17,370,000 $17,370,000 $0 $17,370,000

IMD $3,400,000 $3,400,000 $0 $3,400,000

NHS $564,000 $564,000 $0 $564,000

Rail $563,000 $563,000 $0 $563,000

Safety $625,000 $500,000 $125,000 $625,000

Section 5307 $16,826,680 $13,461,344 $3,365,336 $16,826,680

STP-State $14,917,760 $12,246,208 $2,671,552 $14,917,760

STP-Urban $49,083,089 $30,713,993 $3,350,813 $34,064,806

TE* $0 $0

Total $121,997,368 $96,816,796 $10,162,289 $106,979,085

FY 2012



State/Local Match**


IM $35,350,000 $35,350,000 $0 $35,350,000 NHS $53,700,000 $53,700,000 $0 $53,700,000 Rail $575,000 $575,000 $0 $575,000 Section 5307 $16,803,214 $13,370,571 $3,432,643 $16,803,214 STP-State $14,392,070 $11,613,656 $2,778,414 $14,392,070 STP-Urban $27,815,598 $21,266,676 $2,561,082 $23,827,758 TE* $0 $0

Total $148,635,882 $135,875,903 $8,772,139 $144,648,042

FY 2013



State/Local Match**


Section 5307 $17,506,478 $14,005,182 $3,501,296 $17,506,478 STP-Urban $18,357,253 $14,362,382 $1,226,657 $15,589,039

Total $35,863,731 $28,367,564 $4,727,953 $33,095,517

31

Table 5 (Continued)


Kentucky

FY 2014



State/Local Match**


Section 5307 $17,856,607 $14,285,286 $3,571,321 $17,856,607 STP-Urban $17,529,275 $11,584,798 $597,856 $12,182,654 Total $35,385,882 $25,870,084 $4,169,177 $30,039,261

FY 2015



State/Local Match**


Section 5307 $17,187,504 $14,570,992 $3,642,748 $18,213,740 STP-Urban $20,173,278 $16,120,588 $2,888,748 $19,009,336 Total $37,360,782 $30,691,580 $6,531,496 $37,223,076

* These funds are programmed annually, therefore projected revenue and project costs are not known at this time. Additional projects could be programmed ** Some projects in Kentucky are using Kentucky Toll Credits for state/local match.

Operations and Maintenance The system of roadways that has been developed for the Louisville and Southern Indiana urbanized area must be maintained. The maintenance of all interstates and state routes is the responsibility of the Indiana Department of Transportation and the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet. The Indiana Department of Transportation projects spending $15,703,034 over the five year period of the TIP to maintain the roadways in Clark and Floyd counties. The Kentucky Transportation Cabinet estimates that $113,697,184 will be spent over the 5 year period to maintain roads in Bullitt, Jefferson, and Oldham counties. The transit system, operated by TARC, must also have funds to operate and maintain service. TARC has projected spending $246,586,132 to operate transit in the five county area over the next five years. Table 6 shows federal and state funding that is available to maintain and operate the transportation system for the Louisville and Southern Indiana urbanized area for the next five years. Between Fiscal Year 2011 and Fiscal Year 2015 there will be approximately $375,986,350 available for the maintenance and operations of the transportation system in the urbanized area.

Table 6

Operations and Maintenance

FY 2011 - FY 2015

INDOT $15,703,034

KYTC $113,697,184

TARC $246,586,132

Total $375,986,350

Source: Operations and maintenance projections were obtained from information provided by INDOT, KYTC, and TARC

32

Air Quality Conformity Transportation conformity is a process to assess the compliance of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and the Transportation Improvement Program with air quality goals of the State Implementation Plans. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has designated Clark and Floyd counties in Indiana, and Bullitt, Jefferson, and Oldham counties in Kentucky as a maintenance area for the 8-hour ozone standard. Clark and Floyd counties and Madison Township of Jefferson County in Indiana, and Bullitt and Jefferson counties in Kentucky are designated as a non-attainment area for the annual PM2.5 standard. The TIP was found to conform based on the conformity of the Horizon 2030 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. All of the projects in the TIP are included in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and their expected completion dates in the TIP are consistent with those in the Horizon 2030 update. The regional emissions analysis of the projects in the Horizon 2030 Metropolitan Transportation Plan update is consistent with the goals and emissions budgets established in the State Implementation Plans (SIPs) of Indiana and Kentucky. Complete documentation of the conformity determination can be found in the Horizon 2030 Metropolitan Transportation Plan update document. Consultation with the state and local air agencies and U.S. EPA has determined that there are no approved Transportation Control Measures contained in the SIPs of Indiana and Kentucky. Included in Table 7, which follows, is a table of exempt projects as defined by 40 CFR 93.126 and 93.127.

Table 7 List of Exempt Projects

KIPDA ID

Project Name Description County

Indiana Projects

1557 10th Street Phase 3: Reconstruct and widen 10th Street from 4 to 5 lanes (5th lane will be a center turn lane) from Dutch Lane/Penn Street to Reeds Lane.

Clark

965 Bethany Road Widen existing lanes (no new travel lanes) on Bethany Road, provide turning lanes at 4 intersections and realign vertical/horizontal curves from IN 62 to IN 403.

Clark

1564 Big Four Bicycle & Pedestrian Bridge

Construction of a ramp at the north end of the Big Four Bridge providing access to the bicycle and pedestrian bridge.

Clark

1394 Blackiston Mill Road

Intersection improvements at Blackiston Mill Road and Potters Lane, including the installation of a traffic signal, a left turn lane on SB Blackiston Mill Road, and left and right turn lanes at WB Potters Lane, including sidewalks, curb, gutters and landscaping.

Clark

1558 Blackiston Mill Road Replacement of Bridge #51 over Silver Creek and reconstruction of approaches on Blackiston Mill Road. Total project length is approximately 0.65 miles.

Clark, Floyd

496 Bridge Inspection Bridge inspection of all bridges under Clark County jurisdiction. Clark

33

1572 Brown Station Way

Reconstruction of Brown Station Way from Randolph Avenue to existing bridge over Silver Creek, a distance of approx. 1.7 miles (no additional lanes proposed). Scope includes the rehabilitation of an existing pedestrian overpass.

Clark

550 CR 12 Phase 2: Reconstruct CR 12 (Old Vincennes Road) as a 2 lane road (no additional lanes) from 0.6 miles southeast of Edwardsville-Galena Road (CR 17) to Luther Road

Floyd

1586 Grantline Road (formerly IN 111)

Reconstruct Grantline Road (IN 111) as a 2 lane road (no additional travel lanes) from McDonald Lane south to Beechwood Avenue for a distance of 1.1 miles.

Floyd

490 Greenville-Borden Road Replace Bridge #60 over branch of Jersey Park Creek on Greenville-Borden Road.

Floyd

1538 I- 64 Bridge maintenance and repair of I-64 bridge over the Ohio River. Floyd

1539 I- 64 Bridge maintenance and repair of I-64 approach bridges to the Ohio River Bridge and over IN 111.

Floyd

1548 I- 64 Automated Traffic Management System (ATMs) installation for TRIMARC operations in Southern Indiana.

Floyd

1769 I- 64 Replace pipe lining at various locations on I-64 Floyd

1805 I- 64 Various roadside maintenance (mowing) on I-64 Floyd

1524 I- 65 I-65 bridge maintenance and rehabilitation (Indiana approach bridge) over the Ohio River.

Clark

1764 I- 65 Install new guardrail on I-65 at various locations on I-65. Clark

1772 I- 65 Historical site preservation on I-65, Historic Train Depot Rehab Clark

1473 I- 65, Exit 1 Park & Ride Relocation of 9th Street for the construction of the park and ride lot located at I-65, Exit 1.

Clark

1560 IN 60 Intersection improvement at Dow Knob Road. Including the addition of turn lanes.

Clark

1565 IN 60 Intersection improvement at Perry Crossing Road including the addition of turn lanes.

Clark

1515 IN 111 Traffic signal modernization at IN 111and IU Southeast/Klerner Lane.

Floyd

1516 IN 111 Pavement rehab of IN 111 from IU Southeast/Klerner Lane to IN 60.

Floyd

1432 IN 111 Pedway Construction of pedestrian bicycle path and sidewalks along Grant Line Road from Beechwood Avenue to Cherokee Drive where it connects with existing pedway and sidewalk.

Floyd

1585 IN 403 Rehabilitate bridge on IN 403 over Silver Creek, 0.98 miles east of US 31 (no additional travel lanes).

Clark

370 Kentuckiana Air Education Kentuckiana Air Education (KAIRE): Ozone prevention and awareness program.

Clark, Floyd

95 McDonald Lane Reconstruct McDonald Lane as a 2 lane road (no additional lanes) from Grantline Road to Charlestown Road.

Floyd

309 Mount Tabor Road Reconstruct Mount Tabor Road as a 2 lane road (no additional lanes) from Grantline Road to Charlestown Road.

Floyd

1587 Paoli Pike Intersection Improvements

Intersection improvements to the intersections of Paoli Pike and Scottsville Road, and Paoli Pike and Buffalo Trail, adding turn lanes.

Floyd

Table 7 (Continued) List of Exempt Projects

34

964 Saint John Road

Reconstruct and realign Saint John Road as a 2 lane (no additional lanes) road 0.5 miles of existing road approximately 2 miles west of IN 60 (improved geometrics on section up and down hillside).

Clark

539 Salem-Nobel Road Reconstruct Salem-Nobel Road as a 2 lane (no additional lanes) road from IN 62 to IN 403.

Clark

1588 State Street Corridor Improvements

Upgrade signalizations at 14 intersections along State Street from Main Street to I-265.

Floyd

56 Ticket To Ride Ticket To Ride regional rideshare program. Clark, Floyd

56 Ticket To Ride Ticket To Ride regional rideshare program. Clark, Floyd

586 US 150 US 150 road reconstruction from 1.73 miles west of IN 335 to 3.80 miles west of I-64, adding continuous left turn lane. Approximately 7.2 miles.

Floyd

992 Various Various Maintenance Projects: General category for needed resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation projects that are air quality exempt and not regionally significant.

Clark, Floyd

1596 Various Indiana Bridge Replacements

Bridge replacement at various locations. Clark, Floyd

1858 Various Ohio River Bridges Add lighting on several bridges over the Ohio River. Clark, Floyd

990 Various Safety Projects General category for needed safety projects in Clark and Floyd Counties that are air quality exempt and not regionally significant.

Clark, Floyd

1859 Various Traffic Signal Modernization

Traffic hardware modernization at various locations in the towns of Clarksville, Sellersburg, New Albany and Galena.

Clark, Floyd

1597 West Street Railroad protection improvement at CSX railroad at West Street in Borden, Indiana.

Clark

Kentucky Projects

1415 21st Century Parks Project in Louisville, KY (Floyds Fork Parks & Trail)

Floyds Fork Parks and Trail: Construction of a 27-mile multi-use trail and related parks along Floyds Fork from the US 31E area to Old Henry Road.

Jefferson

337 Bicycle & Pedestrian Education, Encouragement, Enforcement & Evaluation

Development of educational and awareness programs concerning bicycle and pedestrian issues. Provide education and training for cyclists, motorists, and city officials about laws governing cyclists' rights and responsibilities

Jefferson

1513 Bicycle Priority Corridor Improvements for bicycling on River Road between Zorn Avenue and Blankenbaker Lane

Jefferson

381 Buechel Bank Road Add center turn lane on Buechel Bank Road from GE Appliance Park to US 31E (Buechel Bypass). Project length is 0.9 miles.

Jefferson

1500 Bus Stop Improvements Improvements of the existing public transit bus stops and their surroundings, including pedestrian facilities.

Jefferson

222 Cooper Chapel Road Phase 1

Phase 1: Reconstruct Cooper Chapel Road from 2 to 3 lanes (3rd lane will be a center turn lane) from KY 61 to Smyrna Parkway. Project length is 1.8 miles.

Jefferson

188 English Station Road Widen English Station Road from 2 to 3 lanes (3rd lane will be a center turn lane) from Aiken Road to Avoca Road.

Jefferson

1762 I-264 Landscaping I-264 (Shawnee Expressway) at Dixie Highway. Jefferson

1442 KY 22 Intersection improvement on KY 22 at KY 2050 (Herr Lane) and the entrance to Ballard High School.

Jefferson

1443 KY 22 Reconstruct KY 22 at Avenue of the Woods and Chatsworth, including the intersection of KY 22 and Springcrest.

Jefferson

1444 KY 22 Reconstruct intersection of KY 22 at Barbour Lane. Jefferson


35

1446 KY 22 Reconstruct intersection of KY 22 at Goose Creek Road. Jefferson

1447 KY 22 Intersection safety improvements on KY 22 at Ten Broeck Way including providing left turn lanes.

Jefferson

1508 KY 22 / KY 329 Intersection improvement at KY 22 and KY 329 in Crestwood. Oldham

1465 KY 44 Reconstruct KY 44 at Bells Mill Road to align the intersection with addition of left turn lane on KY 44.

Bullitt

1466 KY 44 Reconstruct KY 44 at Bogard/Lloyd Lane; align intersection and add left turn lanes on KY 44.

Bullitt

1468 KY 44 Reconstruct KY 44 at Armstrong/Fisher Lane with addition of left turn lanes on KY 44.

Bullitt

1507 KY 155 Reconstruct intersection of KY 155 and KY 148. Jefferson

1609 KY 155/Old Heady Road Construct a left turn lane on KY 155 (Taylorsville Road) at Old Heady Road, 1.6 miles northwest of the I-265 underpass in Louisville.

Jefferson

1790 KY 245 Minor widening of KY 245 (no additional travel lanes) from Bernheim Forest to the Community College. Project length is 1.2 mi.

Bullitt

1726 KY 524 Landslide repair on KY 524 (Westport Road) from Junction US 42 northwest, 1.0 mile.

Oldham

1879 KY 864 Widen Beulah Church Road from 2 lanes to 3 lanes from I-265 to Cedar Creek Road.

Jefferson

154 KY 1450 Widen KY 1450 (Blue Lick Road) from 2 to 3 lanes (3rd lane will be a center turn lane) from I-265 (Gene Snyder Freeway) to KY 61 (Preston Highway). Approximately 1.669 miles.

Jefferson

128 KY 1931 Widen KY 1931 (Greenwood Road) from 2 to 3 lanes (3rd lane will be a center turn lane) from KY 1934 (Greenbelt Highway) to US 31W (Dixie Highway), a total of 2.6 miles.

Jefferson

1109 Ohio River Levee Trail - Phase IIB & Phase III

Complete the ORLT, a shared use path along the Ohio River in West Jefferson Co. Phase IIB will run from Cane Run Road north to south of Lees Lane and Phase III will run from Chickasaw Park to Lees Lane.

Jefferson

327 Oldham County Bicycle & Pedestrian Trail

Construct a non-motorized corridor from LaGrange to Jefferson County line.

Oldham

1423 River Road Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements

River Road Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements from downtown Louisville to the city of Prospect (US 42), 8.5 miles.

Jefferson

1647 River Road Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements Phase II

Construct bicycle and pedestrian improvements along River Road between Zorn Avenue and US 42. Phase II is specifically between Blankenbaker Lane and Glenview Road.

Jefferson

585 TARC Capital Improvement Program

Annual formula funding allocations to TARC that provide revenue for vehicle maintenance, facility rehabilitation, equipment, and for replacement of vehicles.

Bullitt, Clark, Floyd, Jefferson,

Oldham

1826 The Park and Ride at Apple Patch

Construction of a park and ride facility including a parking lot, shelter, playground, bike lockers, walkways, and a 1000' access road located on Apple Patch Way off of KY-329 near I-71 Exit 14 in Crestwood.

Oldham

162 Ticket To Ride Ticket To Ride regional rideshare program. Bullitt, Jefferson,

Oldham

230 US 42 Construct 2 way center turn lane on US 42 from Harrods Creek Bridge north to River Road. Project length is 1.0 miles.

Jefferson


36

1271 US 42

Reconstruct US 42 and widen from 2 lanes to 3 lanes (3rd lane will be a center turn lane) from Jefferson/Oldham County line to Ridgemoor Drive. Project will include the consideration of improvements to the Hayfield Way intersection.

Oldham

275 US 60A Re-curb US 60A (Eastern Parkway) from KY 1631 (Crittenden Drive) to US 31E (Bardstown Road). Approximately 2.9 miles.

Jefferson

172 Various Various general operations projects eligible for resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation utilizing National Highway funds.

Bullitt, Jefferson, Oldham

173 Various Various general operations projects eligible for resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation utilizing Interstate Maintenance funds.


174 Various Various general rail/highway protection improvement program projects in the urban area.


1270 Various Various safety projects in the Louisville urbanized area. Bullitt, Jefferson,

Oldham

175 Various Various general statewide pavement marker/marking program projects in urbanized area.

Bullitt, Jefferson, Oldham, Shelby

1643 Various Bridge Replacement Projects

Various bridge replacement projects: general category needed for bridge replacement projects that are air quality exempt and not regionally significant.


1633 Various Safety Projects - Kentucky

General category for safety projects that are air quality exempt and not regionally significant.


329 Various Sidewalk Projects in Louisville Metro

Construction of various sidewalk projects in Louisville Metro. Jefferson

1427 Various Sidewalks in Oldham County

Construct various sidewalks in Oldham County Oldham

1229 Various Sidewalks on State Routes in Kentucky

Installation of sidewalks to fix gaps in pedestrian network on various state maintained roads in Oldham, Jefferson and Bullitt counties.


1582 Watterson Trail Phase I Improve streetscape, reconstruct sidewalks and enhance landscaping from Maple Road to Old Taylorsville Road.

Jefferson

1583 Watterson Trail Phase II Widen Watterson Trail from 2 to 3 lanes from Ruckriegel Parkway to Maple Road.

Jefferson

1584 Watterson Trail Phase III Widen Watterson Trail from 2 to 3 lanes from Old Taylorsville Road to Grand Avenue.

Jefferson


37

fy 2011 â€“ fy 2015 transportation improvement program - kipda

Documents