g. michael witte executive secretary indiana supreme court disciplinary commission ethical perils of...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: G. Michael Witte Executive Secretary Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission ETHICAL PERILS OF SOLO AND SMALL FIRM PRACTICE](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649d155503460f949eaf78/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
G. Michael WitteExecutive Secretary
Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission
ETHICAL PERILS OF SOLO AND SMALL FIRM PRACTICE
![Page 2: G. Michael Witte Executive Secretary Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission ETHICAL PERILS OF SOLO AND SMALL FIRM PRACTICE](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649d155503460f949eaf78/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
BY THE NUMBERS (fiscal 2010)
1,542 - grievances filed (fiscal 2010)906/636 - dismissals to request for
response40/63 - VC’s filed and # of counts____________________________________
17,187 – active, in good standing2,755 – inactive, in good standing1,245 – pro hac vice (temporary
admission)8.47 grievances for every 100 active
lawyer
![Page 3: G. Michael Witte Executive Secretary Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission ETHICAL PERILS OF SOLO AND SMALL FIRM PRACTICE](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649d155503460f949eaf78/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
LAW LICENSE STATUSAdministrative Status
Active - Admis.& Disc. Rule 2(b)
Inactive – Admis. & Disc. Rule 2(c)
Retired – Admis. & Disc Rule 2(d)
Withdraw – Admis. & Disc. Rule 2(l)
Deceased
Discipline StatusSuspension –
Admis. & Disc. Rule 23(3)(a)With or W/O auto
reinstatement - 180 day rule
Disbarment – Admis. & Disc. Rule 23(3)(a)
Resignation – Admis. & Disc. Rule 23(17)
![Page 4: G. Michael Witte Executive Secretary Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission ETHICAL PERILS OF SOLO AND SMALL FIRM PRACTICE](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649d155503460f949eaf78/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
LAW LICENSE STATUS
In re Barce, 934 NE2d 732 (Ind. 2010)
In re Rocchio, 943 NE2d 797 (Ind. 2011)
![Page 5: G. Michael Witte Executive Secretary Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission ETHICAL PERILS OF SOLO AND SMALL FIRM PRACTICE](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649d155503460f949eaf78/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
LAWYER ADVERTISING
Prof. Cond. R. 7.3 – Direct Contact With Prospective Clients and Targeted Solicitations
Prof. Cond. R. 7.5 – Firm Names and Letterheads
Admis. Disc. R. 27 – Professional Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, and Limited Partnerships
![Page 6: G. Michael Witte Executive Secretary Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission ETHICAL PERILS OF SOLO AND SMALL FIRM PRACTICE](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649d155503460f949eaf78/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
TRUST ACCOUNTS
Admis. Disc. R. 23(29)
Trust Account Manual
Trust Account School
![Page 7: G. Michael Witte Executive Secretary Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission ETHICAL PERILS OF SOLO AND SMALL FIRM PRACTICE](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649d155503460f949eaf78/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
SUPERVISING EMPLOYEESProf. Cond. R. 5.3 – Responsibilities
Regarding Non-lawyer Assistants
Use of Non-lawyer Assistants Guidelines 9.1 – 9.10
CasesIn re Litz, 950 N.E.2d 291 (2010)In re Anonymous, 929 N.E.2d 778 (2010)In re Schuyler, 894 N.E.2d 543 (2008)In re Anonymous, 876 N.E.2d 333 (2007)
![Page 8: G. Michael Witte Executive Secretary Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission ETHICAL PERILS OF SOLO AND SMALL FIRM PRACTICE](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649d155503460f949eaf78/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ATTORNEY FEES
In re Powell, 953 N.E.2d 1060 (2011)
In re Hammerle, 952 N.E.2d 751 (2011)
In re Kray, 938 N.E.2d 218 (2010)
In re Lauter, 933 N.E.2d 1258 (2010)
In re O’Farrell, 942 N.E.2d 799 (2011)
In re Rawls, 936 N.E.2d 812 (2010)
In re Zielinski, 943 N.E.2d 809 (2011)
![Page 9: G. Michael Witte Executive Secretary Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission ETHICAL PERILS OF SOLO AND SMALL FIRM PRACTICE](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649d155503460f949eaf78/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
REPORTING LAWYER MISCONDUCT – Rule of Prof. Cond. 8.3(a)
A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority.
![Page 10: G. Michael Witte Executive Secretary Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission ETHICAL PERILS OF SOLO AND SMALL FIRM PRACTICE](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649d155503460f949eaf78/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
REPORTING LAWYER MISCONDUCT – Admis. and Disc. Rule 23(11.1 )(a)(2)
An attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Indiana who is found guilty of a crime in any state or of a crime under the laws of the United States shall, within ten (10) days after such finding of guilt, transmit a certified copy of the finding of guilt to the Executive Secretary of the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission.
![Page 11: G. Michael Witte Executive Secretary Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission ETHICAL PERILS OF SOLO AND SMALL FIRM PRACTICE](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649d155503460f949eaf78/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
REPORTING LAWYER MISCONDUCT – Admis. and Disc. Rule 23(11.1 )(a)(1)
“The judge of any court in this state in which an attorney is found guilty of a crime shall, within ten (10) days after the finding of guilt, transmit a certified copy of proof of the finding of guilt to the Executive Secretary of the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission.”
Confusion with felony conviction procedure.
![Page 12: G. Michael Witte Executive Secretary Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission ETHICAL PERILS OF SOLO AND SMALL FIRM PRACTICE](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649d155503460f949eaf78/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
REPORTING LAWYER MISCONDUCT - Code of Judicial Conduct
Canon 2, Rule 2.15(B) – A judge having knowledge that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question regarding the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects shall inform the appropriate authority.
Canon 2, Rule 2.15(C) – A judge who receives credible information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct shall take appropriate action.
![Page 13: G. Michael Witte Executive Secretary Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission ETHICAL PERILS OF SOLO AND SMALL FIRM PRACTICE](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649d155503460f949eaf78/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)