g2p/gep beamline

21
g2p/GEp Beamline Tim Michalski Project Lead

Upload: urian

Post on 22-Feb-2016

57 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

g2p/GEp Beamline. Tim Michalski Project Lead. Overview. Facilitate the design, procurement, and build of the beamline – up to the target chamber g2p/GEp Beamline Overview Experimental Plan Project Overview Project Status Project Challenges with Risk Mitigation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: g2p/GEp Beamline

g2p/GEp Beamline

Tim MichalskiProject Lead

Page 2: g2p/GEp Beamline

Overview• Facilitate the design, procurement, and

build of the beamline – up to the target chamber

• g2p/GEp Beamline Overview• Experimental Plan• Project Overview• Project Status• Project Challenges with Risk Mitigation• Project Schedule and Milestones

Page 3: g2p/GEp Beamline

Beamline Overview

A second configuration will have the target at the pivot and a longer articulating arm.

Page 4: g2p/GEp Beamline

Experimental PlanRun #

Bam Energy

Beam Current

Target Angle Target Location Septa Magnet Dump

Target Material Target field Comments

1 2.257 1 uA 20 87 cm upstream N/A N/A Hall A Dump N/A 0.0 Straight Thru Beam at nominal height.2 2.257 50-130 nA 90 87 cm upstream g2p Yes - 6 deg Local Dump NH3 5.1 T3 2.257 150 nA max 90 87 cm upstream g2p Yes - 6 deg Local DumpCarbon(?) 5.1 T Thru Target(?) - Optics4 2.257 50-130 nA 20 87 cm upstream GEp Yes - 6 deg Local Dump NH3 5.1 T5 1.159 1 uA 20 87 cm upstream N/A N/A Hall A Dump N/A 0.0 Straight Thru Beam at nominal height.6 1.159 50-130 nA 20 87 cm upstream GEp Yes - 6 deg Local Dump NH3 2.5 T7 1.159 50-130 nA 90 87 cm upstream g2p Yes - 6 deg Local Dump NH3 2.5 T8 1.159 150 nA max 90 87 cm upstream g2p Yes - 6 deg Local Dump Carbon(?) 2.5 T Thru Target(?) - Optics9 1.706 1 uA 20 87 cm upstream N/A N/A Hall A Dump N/A 0.0 Straight Thru Beam at nominal height.

10 1.706 50-130 nA 90 87 cm upstream g2p Yes - 6 deg Local Dump NH3 2.5 T11 1.706 150 nA max 90 87 cm upstream g2p Yes - 6 deg Local Dump Carbon(?) 2.5 T Thru Target(?) - Optics12 1.706 50-130 nA 20 87 cm upstream GEp Yes - 6 deg Local Dump NH3 2.5 T27 2.257 50-130 nA 20 87 cm upstream G2p Yes- 6 deg Local Dump NH3 5.1T Target nominal height28 2.257 50-130 nA 90 87 cm upstream g2p Yes - 6 deg Local Dump NH3 5.1 T Target nominal height13 3.355 1 uA N/A 87 cm upstream N/A N/A Hall A Dump N/A 0.0 Straight Thru Beam at nominal height17 3.355 50-130 nA 0 87 cm upstream g2p Yes - 6 deg Hall A Dump NH3 5.1 T Longitudinal target polarization run15 3.355 50-130 nA 90 87 cm upstream g2p Yes - 6 deg Local Dump NH3 5.1 T16 3.355 150 nA max 90 87 cm upstream g2p Yes - 6 deg Local Dump Carbon(?) 5.1 T Thru Target(?) - Optics18 2.257 1 uA N/A At pivot N/A N/A Hall A Dump N/A 0.0 Straight Thru Beam at nominal height.19 2.257 50-130 nA 90 At pivot g2p No - 12.5 deg Local Dump NH3 5.1 T20 2.257 150 nA max 90 At pivot g2p No - 12.5 deg Local Dump Carbon(?) 5.1 T Thru Target(?) - Optics21 2.257 50-130 nA 90 At pivot GEp No - 12.5 deg Local Dump NH3 5.1 T26 1.159*** 50-130 nA 90 At pivot No – 12.5 deg Local Dump N/A 2.5 T Optics Transform22 3.355 1 uA N/A At pivot N/A N/A Hall A Dump N/A 0.0 Straight Thru Beam at nominal height.23 3.355 50-130 nA 90 At pivot g2p No - 12.5 deg Local Dump NH3 5.1 T24 3.355 150 nA max 90 At pivot g2p No - 12.5 deg Local Dump Carbon(?) 5.1 T Thru Target(?) - Optics25 3.355 50-130 nA 90 At pivot GEp No - 12.5 deg Local Dump NH3 5.1 T

*** - FZ1 and FZ2 in position for 2.2 GeV run, but with half field strength on FZs and Target magnets

Targ

et E

leva

ted

by 9

cm

Rev 3

Page 5: g2p/GEp Beamline

Run Trajectories

FZ1

FZ2

Target

FZ1

FZ2

Target

Page 6: g2p/GEp Beamline

Region 1

Page 7: g2p/GEp Beamline

Slow Raster/Calorimeter Stand

Page 8: g2p/GEp Beamline

Regions 2 and 3

Page 9: g2p/GEp Beamline

Upside Down Girder – Region 2

Page 10: g2p/GEp Beamline

FZ1 Magnet Stand – Region 3

Page 11: g2p/GEp Beamline

Viewer – Region 3

Page 12: g2p/GEp Beamline

Beam Diagnostics Girder “Articulating Arm” – Region 3

Page 13: g2p/GEp Beamline

Project Overview• Design, procurement, component calibration

and testing– Now through May, 2011– Some components arrive after May

• Access to Hall A for installation – May 16, 2011

• Installation completion – start of Physics– November 19, 2011

Page 14: g2p/GEp Beamline

Project Status• Regions 1 and 2 designs complete and material

ordered• Region 3 design complete – procurement under

way• Calorimeter controller repaired and SW upgrades

complete• I&C electronics designed and being built• New Transport electronics being built for existing

BPMs in Hall A• Safety systems for experiment reviewed• Resource planning integrated into 6MSD

schedule

Page 15: g2p/GEp Beamline

Project Challenges• BPMs and BCMs for Low Current data

– Mitigation• BPM – short M15 style, new electronics, tested in

North LINAC• BCM – new receiver, tested in Hall A

• FZ Magnet PS requirements evolving– Need up to 4 kG, requiring 231A for FZ1– Need up to 8 kG, requiring 465A for FZ2– Mitigation – assessed capabilities of magnet

power supplies in Hall C – meet requirements – assembling spares

Page 16: g2p/GEp Beamline

Project Challenges• Acquisition of equipment from various

sources– FZ magnets, corrector magnets, slow raster,

new BPMs, power supplies, controllers– Mitigation – get control as soon as possible,

test and calibrate early (before installation)• Resurrection of Tungsten Calorimeter

– Reposition in beamline, re-establish functionality, recalibrate

– Mitigation – Controller extracted from Hall A, repaired, SW complete

Page 17: g2p/GEp Beamline

Project Challenges• Slow Raster control issues in previous

experiment– Mitigation – New function generator – Testing

in Progress by Physics Fast Electronics Group

• Installation at the same time as 12 GeV upgrades during 6 month down– Mitigation – tied to detailed 6MSD planning –

all resources identified in schedules – have ~3 weeks float

Page 18: g2p/GEp Beamline

Project Challenges• Not all material for installation on site yet

– Mitigation – FZ2 Stand procurement being managed –

potential impact to 6MSD installation reviewed– Viewer and Articulating Arm Girder /

Positioning – manage through Machine Shop and local vendors

Page 19: g2p/GEp Beamline

Safety – PSS / FSD• Uses standard BLA system components• Monitoring FZ magnet PS current – limits set to ensure

beam is controlled successfully through the chicane• FSD masking for Calorimeter Operation• Viewer in chicane – allows MCC Operators to view beam

for steering confirmation• Thermocouples on LC dump• Viewer on LC dump – allows MCC Operators to view

beam for steering confirmation• Update PSS sweep procedure as required after walk-

through, equipment installation• “Lock Out” FZ2 stand control – remove controller

Page 20: g2p/GEp Beamline

Beamline Installation Schedule

Page 21: g2p/GEp Beamline

Beamline Installation Milestones