gad cns drugs 09

20
CNS Drugs 2009 23 C2) 103-120 © 2009 AcSs UatQ Information SV All ilgMts reserved. Current Considerations in the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder Martin Ä. Katzman START (Stress, Trauma, Anxiety, Rehabilitation, and Treatment) Clinic for Mood and Anxiety Disorders, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Contents Abstract 103 1. Co-Morbidity 105 2. Impact of Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) on Patients 105 3. Symptoms of GAD 106 A. Diagnosis and Assessment of GAD 107 5, Phormacoiogicai and Genetic Basis of GAD 107 6, Treatment ot GAD 108 6.1 Treatment Guidelines 108 6.2 Seiective Serotonin Reuptoke tntiibitors 109 Ó.3 Serotonin Noradrenaiine Reuptake Inhibitors 110 6.4 Pregabalin HI 6.5 Buspirone 111 6.6 imipramine m 6.7 Benzodiazepines 111 6.8 Limitations of First-Line Treatment Options 112 7, Treatment Response and Remission 112 8, Use of Nonpharmacological Approaches for Patients with GAD 112 9, Atypicai Antipsychotics in GAD 113 10. Discussion 115 11, Conciusions 116 Abstract Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a chronic disorder that frequently co-occurs with a variety of co-morbidities in patients with somatic conditions and other mental disorders. GAD is highly prevalent and is one of the most common anxiety disorders seen by primary care physicians. The individual and societal cost associated with GAD is high and the marked level of impair- ment experienced by patients with this disorder is equivalent in magnitude to that reported in patients with major depressive disorder. Furthermore, patients with GAD are at risk of suicide or suicide attempts, and are frequent users of healthcare services. Thus, GAD is a serious and chronic condition that requires appropriate long-term treatment. The focus of acute treatment for patients with GAD is the improvement of symptoms, while the primary goal oflong-term clinical management is remis- sion, i.e. the complete resolution of both symptoms and functional impairment.

Upload: tvmedicine

Post on 16-Sep-2015

225 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Gad Cns Drugs 09

TRANSCRIPT

  • CNS Drugs 2009 23 C2) 103-120

    2009 AcSs UatQ Information SV All ilgMts reserved.

    Current Considerations in theTreatment of GeneralizedAnxiety DisorderMartin . KatzmanSTART (Stress, Trauma, Anxiety, Rehabilitation, and Treatment) Clinic for Mood and Anxiety Disorders,Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    ContentsAbstract 103

    1. Co-Morbidity 1052. Impact of Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) on Patients 1053. Symptoms of GAD 106A. Diagnosis and Assessment of GAD 1075, Phormacoiogicai and Genetic Basis of GAD 1076, Treatment ot GAD 108

    6.1 Treatment Guidelines 1086.2 Seiective Serotonin Reuptoke tntiibitors 109.3 Serotonin Noradrenaiine Reuptake Inhibitors 1106.4 Pregabalin HI6.5 Buspirone 1116.6 imipramine m6.7 Benzodiazepines 1116.8 Limitations of First-Line Treatment Options 112

    7, Treatment Response and Remission 1128, Use of Nonpharmacological Approaches for Patients with GAD 1129, Atypicai Antipsychotics in GAD 113

    10. Discussion 11511, Conciusions 116

    Abstract Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a chronic disorder that frequentlyco-occurs with a variety of co-morbidities in patients with somatic conditionsand other mental disorders. GAD is highly prevalent and is one of the mostcommon anxiety disorders seen by primary care physicians. The individualand societal cost associated with GAD is high and the marked level of impair-ment experienced by patients with this disorder is equivalent in magnitudeto that reported in patients with major depressive disorder. Furthermore,patients with GAD are at risk of suicide or suicide attempts, and are frequentusers of healthcare services. Thus, GAD is a serious and chronic conditionthat requires appropriate long-term treatment.

    The focus of acute treatment for patients with GAD is the improvement ofsymptoms, while the primary goal oflong-term clinical management is remis-sion, i.e. the complete resolution of both symptoms and functional impairment.

  • 104 Kalzman

    The consensus across current treatment guidelines is that first-line treatmentfor patients with GAD should consist of an antidepressant. either a selectiveserotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) such as sertraline. paroxetine or escita-lopram, or a selective serotonin noradrenaline (norepinephrine) reuptakeinhibitor (SNRI) such as venlafaxine or duloxetine. However, the SSRIs andSNRIs have efficacy limitations, such as lack of response in many patients, a2- to 4-week delay before the onset of symptom relief, lack of full remission,and risk of relapse. In addition, there are troublesome adverse effects asso-ciated with both the SSRIs and SNRIs.

    Evidence from early clinical studies of the atypical antipsychotics in thetreatment of anxiety and GAD indicate that they may have a potential rolein the treatment of GAD, either as monotherapy or as augmentation tostandard treatment.

    Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a chronicdisorder that is highly prevalent; in the US the12-month and lifetime prevalence rates of GADwere estimated to be 3.1% and 5.7%, respec-tively.f'-'l In primary care, the prevalence ofGAD is typically higher than that observed in thecommunity, making it one of the most commonanxiety disorders seen by primary care physi-cians. For example, in a large European primarycare study {n= 13677), 8.3% of patients whopresented to their general practitioner were diag-nosed as having GAD.'"*!

    Patients with GAD are frequent users ofhealthcare services. In a US study of high utilizersof healthcare services, DSM-III-Rf^l diagnoseswere made on a sample of 119 distressed highutilizers, 22% of whom had a diagnosis ofGAD.t^' More recently, the Mental Health Sup-plement to the Ontario Health Survey (a surveyof 8116 Canadian respondents aged 15-64 years)showed that four or more visits made to a pri-mary care physician over a 12-month periodindicated a 35% chance of the patient havingGAD.t'l This survey also showed that patientswho sought help from mental health servicesin the past year had a 50% chance of havingGAD.

    GAD follows a chronic course during the first5 years that may last up to 20 years, and is asso-ciated with low rates of remission and moderaterates of relapse/recurrence following remission.f^'In the US National Comorbidity Survey (NCS)conducted in 8098 subjects aged 15-54 years.

    GAD was twice as common among women as itwas among men and. as age increased, so did thelifetime prevalence.'''' Multivadate logistic regres-sion analysis showed that being older than24 years of age, separated, widowed, divorced,unemployed or a homemaker were significantcorrelates of GAD.^l

    Epidemiology studies consistently indicatethat GAD may occur at any point in a person'slifetime,''*'' but is relatively uncommon beforethe age of 20 years, with a mean age at onset of21 years.'"'-"' However, the age of onset has abimodal distribution - onset occurs earlier whenGAD is the primary presentation and later whenGAD is secondary.'"'

    While GAD represents an illness that mayhave presented with significant GAD symptomswhen patients are aged in their 20s, childhoodrisk factors have been identified, such as inter-nalizing problems, conduct problems and asomewhat more inhibited temperament.''-' Chil-dren with family members who have an anxietydisorder have a higher risk of developing over-anxious disorder of childhood and GAD. Forexample, adults with anxiety disorders have chil-dren with greater than expected rates of behav-ioural inhibition (60-76%).f'-^"'*'' Furthermore, ina study of a clinically derived sample of 31 chil-dren (60 parents) and an epidemiologicallyderived (longitudinal) sample of 40 children(75 parents), it was found that inhibited childrenhad parents with greater than expected rates ofanxiety disorders (75% if the child was inhibited

    2009 AtSs Dato Information BV. All rights reserved. CNSDfugs2009;23C2)

  • The Role of Atypical Antipsychotics in GAD 105

    and anxious; 29% if the child was inhibited Table I, Lifetime prevalence of co-morbidilies associated withgeneralized anxiety disorcteH^-^i

    Schwartz et al.t'^' reported that the parents ofchildren with stable behavioural inhibition hadhigher rates of multiple childhood anxiety dis-orders (25% vs 3.6%) and that the higher rates ofanxiety disorder continued into their adulthood(35% vs 7.3%). Similarly, Biederman et alj'-'l re-ported that compared with healthy children, be-haviourally inhibited children had an increasedrisk for at least one anxiety disorder (22% vs 0%),for over-anxious disorder or childhood GAD(27.8% vs 0%) and for phobic disorders (31.8% vs5.3%).

    In addition, data from a prospective, longitu-dinal community study conducted in 3021adolescents and young adultsf'**! have shown that>50% of patients with GAD have had a majordepressive episode by the age of 18 years.''^^

    1. Co-Morbidity

    GAD is often co-morbid with mood and an-xiety disorders (table \)P-~^^ In the US commu-nity-based NCS conducted in 8098 persons (aged15-54 years). 90.4% of respondents with lifetimeGAD reported having at least one other lifetimemental health disorder.f^--''

    More recently, a German community studyof 4181 adults (aged 18-65 years) estimated the12-month prevalence of GAD according toDSM-IVf"I criteria to be \.5%S~^i Of the12-month GAD cases. 93% had another DSM-IVdisorder, 59% fulfilled the criteria for major de-pressive disorder (MOD) and 56% fulfilled thecriteria for any other anxiety disorder.'-^^ Specificphobia (29%) and social phobia (29%) were theanxiety disorders that were most frequently co-morbid with GAD.f- '^l The proportion of patientswith 12-month GAD and any co-morbid DSM-IV eating disorder, eo-morbid alcohol abuse/dependence and drug abuse/dependence were2.5%, 6.4% and 1.4%, respectively. Furthermore,a prospective community-based study in youngadults found that GAD is negatively associatedwith being overweight.'-*'

    GAD may occur as the primary disorder (i.e.pre-dating other disorders) or as a secondary

    Co-mofbidityMajor depressive disorderDysthymiaSpecific (simple) phobiaSocial phobia (social anxiety disorder)AgoraphobiaPanic disorderManiaSubstance abuseAlcohol use ot dependenceDrug use or dependence

    Prevalence {%)60,9-82.437.7-39.533.6-35.134.0-34.4207-25.721.8-23.57.9-10.5

    33.137.627.6

    disorder (i.e. developing after other disorders).'-^1For example. MDD most often develops in thesame year or after the onset of GAD, whereassocial phobia typically pre-dates the onset ofGAD (figure 1 ).[-=]

    Bipolar disorder and GAD are also commonlyco-morbid, with the proportion of patients withbipolar disorder having a lifetime GAD diagnosisreported to be 18.4%.'^^!

    2. Impact of Generalized AnxietyDisorder (GAD) on PatientsThe quality of life and level of functioning in

    patients with GAD is, in reality, lower than thatperceived by others. Henning et al.t-'^ l found thatpatients with GAD reported statistically sig-nificantly less satisfaction with their quality of lifethan non-anxious controls (mean total Quality ofLife Inventory [QOLIp**! score 0.06 vs 2.47;p

  • 106 Kxilzmau

    Pre-dates GADa Same yearn Post-dates GADCo-morbid disorder

    Drug disorder

    Alcohol disorder

    Social phobia

    Simple phobia

    Agoraphobia

    Panic disorder

    Dysthymia

    Major depressive disorder

    0 20 40 60 80 100Lifetime co-morbid DSM-ill-R cases {%)

    Fig. 1. The relative onset of mood and anxiety disorders that occurco-morbidly with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) [reproducedfrom Stein,'^^' wtth permission from Physicians Postgraduate Press.Copyright 2001],

    GAD and MDD (n = 40) after controlling for age,gender and other psychopathology.'-"*' In fact,respondents with pure GAD had significantlylower quality of life scores on several of the ShortForm-36 Health Survey scales'^ '^ than respon-dents with pure MDD. The results of this surveyconfirm the status of GAD as an independentdiagnosis.

    In addition to the high level of impairment,patients with GAD are at risk of suicide or suicideattempts. In the European Study on the Epide-miology of Mental Disorders (a large communitysurvey of 21 425 respondents), GAD was foundto be strongly related to suicidality, with a rateratio of 2.3 for lifetime attempts and 1,8 for life-time ideation.'- '^'' This compares with rate ratiosfor major depressive episodes of 4.8 and 2.9 for life-time attempts and lifetime ideation, respectively.

    The development of other psychiatric dis-orders is another possible consequence of GAD;even without a past history of GAD, patientsexperiencing a current episode of the disorderhave an increased risk of developing other mentaldisorders.'*^ '^ Furthermore, it has been shownthat a prior history of GAD increases the riskof developing MDD.'^ ^^ '' The impact of psychia-tric co-morbidity is great; patients with GAD anda co-morbid psychiatric condition experience

    increased psychological and social impairment,have an extended course and poorer outcome,and arc higher utilizers of healthcare resourcesthan patients with GAD alone.'-^ '-^ '^ ' A similareffect is seen when GAD occurs with a co-morbidsomatic condition.t-^ "^ -^ **'

    The economic burden of GAD is also high. Ina German study of 3021 respondents (aged 14-24years), subjects with GAD had a greater numberof days lost from work in the past month thansubjects with no mental disorder (8 days vs

  • The Role of Atypical Antipsychotics in GAD 107

    uncertainty and GADJ"**'! Intolerance of un-certainty may also be considered to be a keyfeature t"^

    4. Diagnosis and Assessment of GAD

    Different diagnostic criteria for GAD are usedin diTcrent countries; in Europe the InternationalStatistical Classification of Diseases, lOth revi-sion (ICD-10)f'**'l and, more recently, the secondedition of the ICD-lOl''^' tend to be employed.ICD-10 has a broader spectrum of associatedsymptoms than the DSM-IV criteria used in theUS (table II).f---501 DSM-IV criteria are the mostfrequently used in clinical trials. These criteriastipulate that patients must have excessive anxi-ety and worry for 6 months, plus three or more ofsix specific symptoms {table II). DSM-V guide-lines are currently being developed, with publi-cation expected in 2011. GAD is one disorderwhose diagnostic criteria may be revised; itis thought that the DSM-IV requirements of6-month duration, excessive worry and threeassociated symptoms may exclude a substantialnumber of people with clinically significant an-xiety from being diagnosed as having GAD.^ ^^ ""!

    To aid accurate diagnosis (and to rule outother possible diagnoses), the patient's medicaland family histories should be assessed, takingnote of recent life events and other health pro-blems such as depression and substance or alco-hol abuse/dependence. It is also important toconsider that patients with GAD have probablymade multiple visits to their primary carephysician or may have consulted differenttypes of physicians, such as gastrointestinalspecialists, and have a history of assessmentsand consultations where no definitive diagnosiswas made.

    The main tool used in the clinical setting toassess the severity of symptoms of GAD is theHamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A).f^*'l However,the HAM-A isa 14-item, clinician-rated scale andis quite time consuming to perform. Recently,scales specific for GAD have been developed,such as the Generalized Anxiety Disorder In-ventory (GADI)[-* -^l and the GAD-7J"! Worrymay be the most important factor in predicting

    the severity of GAD, specifically In the inductionof symptoms of GAD, and the Penn State WorryQuestionnaire (PSWQ), a 16-item, self-ratedquestionnaire that assesses pathological worryand captures the excessiveness and uncontroll-ability characteristic of pathological worry, is animportant tool for assessing thisj^"*! It has astrong sensitivity and specificity in distinguishingpatients with GAD from those without GAD.Table III summarizes the major advantages anddisadvantages of these scales.

    5. Pharmacoiogicai and Genetic Basisof GAD

    There is a variety of evidence implicating thedysfunction of GABA, noradrenergic and sero-tonergic systems in the expression of GAD.'^ ^-^^lThis includes evidence that, in patients withGAD, the number of platelet a^-adrenergic re-ceptors is reduced, and there are reduced plateletserotonin sites and reduced serotonin levels inCSF. Also, the benzodiazepine receptors in peri-pheral tissues are reduced.f'^ -^''*'' Patients withGAD respond to treatment with benzodiaze-pines, further supporting the fact that these

    Table II. International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10threvision (ICD-10} and DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for generalizedanxiety disorder (GAD)ICD-10 criteriai-'s 'SI

    For a diagnosis of GAD, patients must have anxiety that isgeneralized and persistent but not restricted to, or even stronglypredominating in, any particular environmental circumstances, i.e. itis 'free-floating'. Dominant symptoms are variable but includepersistent nervousness, trembling, muscular tensions and epigastricdisoomfort. Fears that the patient or a relative will shortly become illor have an accident are often expressedDSM-IV criteriai^^iFor a diagnosis of GAD, patients must have excessive anxiety andworry for 6 months, plus have three or more of the followingsymptoms:

    restlessnessfatiguedifficulty concentratingirritabilitymuscle tensionsleep disturbance

    2009 Adte Data Information BV, AJI rights reserved. CNS Drugs 2009: 23 (2)

  • 108 Katzman

    Table III. Summary of the main disease severity scales that may be used to assess generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)Scale and type Advantages DisadvantagesClinician ratedHarnJIton Anxiety Scale

    Self ratedGAD Inventory (GADO's i^

    GAD-7"'

    Penn State Worry Questionnaire{PSWOjiS"!Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale

    Current 'gold standard' scale and reference scalein clinical trialsAssesses severity of anxiety symptoms

    Specific for GADAssesses symptom profile and severityBrief, 7-item scaleSpecific for GADGood screening toolGood measure ol pathological worry

    Good measure of a potentially importantaetiological factor in GAD

    Time consuming; takes 10-15 minutes to complete(14-item scale)Needs a trained rater

    Time consuming (18-item scale)Not yet well establishedNot yet well established

    Time consuming (16-item scale)Specific for general worryDoes not specifically measure severityHas not been assessed as an outcome measure

    patients may have a deficiency in the GABA/benzodiazepine system. These three neuro-transmitter systems are involved in the body'sresponse to stress (processing fear and anxietyresponses).

    The involvement of the serotonin 5-HT,d, re-ceptor subtype has been demonstrated in patientswith GAD in clinical trials of buspirone, and maybe the result of a neurochemical imbalance in-volving serotonin. Serotonin is widely distributedthroughout the brain, particularly in regions asso-ciated with anxiety.f^ "^ ! The selective serotoninreuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) bind to the serotonintransporter to prevent the reuptake of serotoninfrom the synaptie cleft.

    The mode of action of SSRIs in GAD, al-though not fully elucidated, is thought to be si-milar to that occurring in panic disorder, in whichtwo opposing theories are currently suggested toexplain the role of serotonin dysfunction: (i) sero-tonin excess, where the action of serotonin isanxiogenic; and (ii) serotonin deficit, where theaction of serotonin is anxiolytic.t''"! In the former,patients have an increased level of serotoninrelease or have supersensitive post-synaptic re-eeptors. This theory suggests an explanation forthe time course of early adverse events associatedwith the later beneficial action of SSRIs; i.e. theinitial exacerbation of symptoms following SSRIadministration may well be related to an in-creased level of serotonin in the synapse acting on

    the supersensitive post-synaptie receptors. This isthen followed by a gradual downregulation ofthese receptors.

    For the second theory, following treatmentwith an SSRI, the initial exacerbation of symp-toms occurs because of a decrease in serotoninrelease by an action on the pre-synaptic in-hibitory 5-HTiA autoreceptor. Antidepressaniresponse occurs following the gradual desensiti-zation of these autoreceptors and the resultantincrease in serotonin levels.

    The role of the serotonin and noradrenalinesystems in both GAD and MDD suggests thaithere may be a neurobiological link between thesetwo disorders. This may explain the high level ofco-morbidity between GAD and MDD, althoughthe two are distinct and separate conditions.Twin and family-based studies have shown aclear genetic influence in GAD, with a heritabilityof approximately 15-40%.[*''*'-' Recent evidencefrom a Swedish twin study of 23 280 members ofsame-sex twin pairs indicates that GAD andMDD are closely related genetically.f^^l

    6. Treatment of GAD

    6,1 Treatment GuidelinesWhile the focus of acute treatment for GAD

    must include the improvement of symptoms, theprimary goal of long-term clinical management

    2009 Adis Dota Information BV. All righfs reserved. CNS Daigs 2009; 23 (3)

  • The Role of Atypical Antipsychotics in GAD 109

    of patients with GAD is remission, i.e. the com-plete resolution of both symptoms and functionalimpairment. Recurrence prevention is anotherlong-term consideration. It is also important toconsider patient-specific goals, e.g. the improve-ment of troubling symptoms, including problemswith sleep or concentration, chronic agitation,irritability, recurrent headaches or muscle pain.Factors such as anticipated adverse effects, ahistory of prior response in the patient or a familymember, patient preference and cost shouldbe considered when deciding which treatment toinitiate.

    Globally, there are several guideline commit-tees that have reported their recommendationsand treatment algorithms for patients with GAD,including the World Federation of Societies ofBiological Psychiatry,'^' the British Associationfor PsychopharmacologyJ^*'' the National In-.stitute for Health and Clinical Excellence,''''^ '^ andthe Canadian Psychiatric Association (CPA)(table IV).l''^ t

    In general, the consensus across treatmentguidelines is that first-line pharmacotherapy forpatients with GAD should consist of an anti-depressant, cither an SSRI, such as paroxetineand escitalopram, or a selective serotonin nora-drenaline inhibitor (SNRI), such as venlafaxine

    or duloxetine (in the US). The CPA guidelines arethe most recent and these attribute the highestlevel (level 1 : meta-analysis or replicated random-ized clinical trial including a placebo arm) to theevidence supporting the use of paroxetine, esci-talopram and venlafaxine as first-line treatmentoptions for GAD.I-^ '^ The CPA consider thatclinical trial data are sufficient to suggest thatthe SSRI sertraline may be an effective first-line treatment option; however, this agent is notcurrently licensed for GAD.'''^' The CPA re-commends imipramine, buspirone, benzodiaze-pines and pregabalin as second-line treatmentoptions. Clinical trial evidence for these agents isstrong (level 1); however, the CPA considers thatthe clinical experience with these agents does notsupport their use as first-line options because ofadverse effects (imipramine, benzodiazepines),lack of efficacy (buspirone) or paucity of data(pregabalin).

    The available evidence for agents that showefficacy in the treatment of GAD is considered inmore detail in sections 6.2-6.7.

    6.2 Selective Serotonin Reuptoke inhibitorsParoxetine was the first SSRI to be licensed for

    the treatment of GAD and is consequently the

    Table IV. Major organizations that have published guidelines/recommendations for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)Organization (year of guideiines) Guideiine FJrsl-line pharmacotherapy options tor GADWorid Federation ot Societies otBiological Psychiatry (2002)

    Brttisti Association torPsychopharmacology (2005)

    National institute for Health andClinical Excellence (2004)

    Canadian Psychiatric Association(2006)

    Guideiines for the pharmacological treatmentof anxiety, obsessive-compuisive and post-traumatic stress disorders'^'Evidence-based guideiines for thepharmacoiogicai treatment of anxiety

    Management ot anxiety (panic disorder, with orwithout agoraphobia, and generalized anxietydisorder) in adults in primary, secondary andcommunity care'*^'Management of anxiety discwders''*^

    SSRI: paroxetineSNRI: veniafaxine

    Acute treatment:SSRfs: paroxetine, escitalopram, sertralineSNRi: ventafaxineBenzodiazepines: aiprazoiam, diazepamTCA: imipramineBuspironeAniihistamines: hydroxyzineLonger-term treatment:SSRIs: paroxetine. escitaiopramSSRI: paroxetineSNRI: veniafaxineBenzodiazepines (not to be used t)eyond 2-4 wk)Antihistamines: hydroxyzineSSRis: paroxetine, escitaiopram, sertraiineSNRIs: veniataxine

    SNRU serotonin noradrenaiine reuptake inhibitor; SSRI = selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

    2009 Adis Etcrta information BV, Ali rights reserved. CNSi>ugs20D9;23Ca

  • no Katzman

    most studied in this indication. The efficacy ofparoxetine in the treatment of DSM-IV GAD hasbeen established in four randomized, double-blind, plaeebo-eontrolled studies (three short-term studies and a study of 6 months' duration) inmore than 1800 patients.f*^ !^ Of the three short-term studies, two found a statistically significantdifference between paroxetine and placebo inthe primary outcome variable of change inHAM-A total score. In the largest of the short-term studies (566 outpatients with GAD and noother axis I disorder), response ('very niuehimproved' or 'much improved' on the ClinicalGlobal Impression-Improvement [CGI-I][^ **1 score)at 8 weeks was achieved by 62% and 68% of pa-tients in the 20 and 40 mg/day paroxetine groups,respectively, and by 46% in the placebo group.[''''^Remission rates (defined as a HAM-A score of

  • The Role of Atypical Antipsychotics in GAD 111

    remission rates at week 24 for venlafaxine-treatedpatients to be lower (27.9%) and similar to pla-cebo (18.9%) [p-0.1 l].i**"I

    Duloxetine has recently been approved in theUS for the treatment of GAD.'**"! Its efficacy hasbeen demonstrated in three randomized, placebo-controlled studies (two 10-week fiexible-dosestudies and one 9-week fixed-dose study) con-ducted in over 1100 patients with GAD.t**-] Thepooled results from these studies showed thatduloxetine significantly improved the HAM-Atotal score from baseline to endpoint comparedwith placebo (mean improvement 11.1 vs 8.0;p< 0.001). Furthermore, in a 10-week active-comparator study in nearly 500 patients withGAD, duloxetine and venlafaxine both producedsignificantly greater improvements from baselinein HAM-A total score compared with placebo.Compared to placebo, the efficacy of duloxetineand venlafaxine was similar. Discontinuation-emergent adverse events were significantly greaterin the venlafaxine group (26.9%; p = 0.04), butnot the duloxetine group (19.4%; p = 0.448), com-pared with placebo.'^ -^^

    6 4 PregoboiinThe antiepileptic pregabalin is approved in

    Europe for the treatment of GAD. It is not con-sidered a first-line option for GAD and is cur-rently only recommended for patients who do notachieve full remission or who are intolerant toSSRIs or SNRIs.[^**5i The efficacy of pregabalin(400 or 600 mg/day) was demonstrated in a 6-week,randomized, double-blind, active-comparator studyin outpatients with moderate to severe DSM-IVGAD (n = 421).l'^ '^] There were significantly greaterimprovements in HAM-A total score at endpointwith both pregabalin and venlafaxine (75 mg/day)than with placebo. The proportion of patientswith a >50% reduction in HAM-A score atendpoint was comparable for treatment withpregabalin 400 mg/day and venlafaxine 75 mg/day.Only pregabalin produced significant improve-ment, compared with placebo, in all a prioriand secondary measures. Discontinuation rateswere greater for venlafaxine than for pregabalin.These results confirm the findings of four

    previous placebo-controlled studies of pregabalinin ! !

    6.5 Buspirone

    Buspirone is the only azapirone licensed forthe treatment of anxiety. Its efficacy in GAD hasbeen studied in several trials: 6 studies versusplacebo, 12 studies versus benzodiazepines, and1 study versus venlafaxine (reviewed by Chessicket al.t^^). A Cochrane systematic review of theresults from these studies found that the efficacyof buspirone in the treatment of GAD wassuperior to placebo, but similar to that of thebenzodiazepines.f^^' In addition, in 365 out-patients with GAD without co-morbid MDD,venlafaxine and buspirone were more effectivethan placebo, and venlafaxine was significantlysuperior to buspirone on the Hospital Anxietyand Depression (HAD) anxiety subscale.f******''Limitations of buspirone include its slow onset ofaction of at least 2 weeks.f^ **l In addition, it hasbeen suggested that the efficacy of azapirones inpatients previously treated with benzodiazepinesmay be limited:^^'' their efficacy in these patientsrequires further investigation. Common adverseeffects reported with buspirone include headache,nausea, dizziness and gastrointestinal problems.^ " '^1

    6.6 imipramine

    Imipramine, a TCA, has been shown to beeffective in treating the symptoms of anxietyin patients with GAD from the third week oftherapy.'^- However, the incidence of adverseevents was higher in imipramine-treated patientsthan in patients treated with the benzodiazepinediazepam.

    6.7 Benzodiazepines

    There is evidence that benzodiazepines areeffective in the treatment of GAD, particularly asthey offer rapid relief of anxiety symptoms.t'^^lAdverse eTects are usually mild and can includesedation and psychomotor impairment.t^-'l How-ever, the long-term use of benzodiazepines inGAD is not recommended because of concernsover dependen ce; f*'^*'^ '! withdrawal symptoms

    2009 Adis Data informafkm BV, AH rights reserved. CMS Drugs 2009; 23 (2)

  • 112 Katzmaii

    have been reported in up to 44% of patients whohave received benzodiazepines for as few as 4-6weeksJ'^ -^ ' Furthermore, benzodiazepines are noteffective for the symptoms of MDD, which isoften co-morbid in patients with GAD, and mayalso cause MDD in the long term.

    6.8 Limitations of First-Line Treatment OptionsDespite being considered first-line treatment

    options in GAD, SSRIs and SNRIs have efficacylimitations, including lack of response in manypatients (response rates in GAD clinical trials areapproximately 60-70%t^ ^-^^- '^*l), a 2- to 4-weekdelay before the onset of symptom reliefj^ "*! slowresponse (it may be 6-12 weeks before significantimprovements are achieved),^''^l lack of full re-mission, i.e. residual symptoms remain in ahigh proportion of patients (30-60% of patientsdo not achieve remission^ '^''" -^'-^ '*!) and risk ofrelapse (relapse rates in GAD clinical trials are

    In addition, the adverse effects associated withboth SSRIs and SNRIs include sexual dysfunc-tion, nausea, gastrointestinal problems, headacheand sweating.[ '^-'^ ^''^ '1 In addition, for the SSRIs,adverse effects (occurring at varying frequencies)include increased nervousness, vomiting andweight gain (with paroxetine). With SNRIs, ad-ditional adverse effects include potential bloodpressure changes (with duloxetine and venlafax-ine) and insomnia.f^ *^ -*^ '^

    A further issue with SSRfs and SNRIs is thatabrupt discontinuation of therapy with theseagents may lead to discontinuation or withdrawalsymptoms.f'"*'* '^ Therefore, when stopping treat-ment, it is important that SSRIs or venlafaxineare gradually tapered over a period of a fewweeks in order to diminish the occurrence of dis-continuation symptoms.['1 Unfortunately, thisis not always possible as patients may indepen-dently decide to discontinue their treatment.

    In October 2004, the US FDA instructedmanufacturers of antidepressants (includingSSRIs and SNRIs) to amend product labelling toinclude a black-box warning and expandedwarning statements regarding an increased risk ofsuicidality (suicidal thinking and behaviour) in

    paediatric and adolescent patients receiving theseagents.f'"'l In May 2007, the FDA proposed up-dates to the existing black-box warnings for allantidepressants to include information about theincreased risks of suicidal thinking and behaviourduring initial treatment in patients aged 18-24years.'"^-' In a recent study of patients withoutpsychosis who were hospitalized because of asuicide attempt, the authors found that fluoxetinewas associated with the lowest risk of suicide(relative risk [RR] 0.52; 95% CI 0.30, 0.93),whereas venlafaxine was associated with thehighest risk (RR 1.61; 95% CI 1.01. 2.57).[i"-''

    7. Treatment Response and Remission

    For many patients with GAD. initial pharma-cotherapy will not lead to remission (definedas a HAM-A total score of

  • The Role of Atypical Antipsychotics in GAD 113

    available literature on this topic is beyond thescope of this paper; however, a brief overview isgiven below.

    There are a limited number of studies in-vestigating the non pharmacological treatmentof GAD. Most of these focus on cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT). CBT is a psycho-therapeutic approach designed to alter behaviourand cognition that produces and maintainsemotional distress.t'"**' CBT for GAD may in-clude psychoeducation, symptom managementtechniques, cognitive restructuring, worry expo-sure and self-monitoring. Recently., a Cochranesystematic review of studies assessing psycho-logical therapies in patients with GAD identified22 studies (1060 subjects) that were eligible forinclusion in meta-analyses.f'*'*'! The resultsshowed that CBT-based psychological therapieswere effective in reducing anxiety over the shortterm in patients with GAD. The authors con-cluded that available evidence comparing otherpsychological therapies with CBT was limited;therefore, conclusions about which psychologicaltherapy is more effective could not be drawn.

    Three earlier studies of CBT in GAD havebeen published.'"^''"'"^! In all the studies includedin these meta-analyses, the symptoms of GADwere reduced. In addition, the effects of treat-ment continued or improved in the 6-12 monthsfollowing treatmentj'''"^^l

    More recently, a study in 45 patients withGAD demonstrated that at 6-month follow-up,CBT was equally effective as applied relaxationtherapy.f'"''l In addition, recent trials in elderlypatients with GAD have shown CBT to be ef-fective. For example, in 85 patients with GAD(aged >60 years), response was higher in the CBTgroup (45%) than in the control group (8%).["''Similarly, two pilot studies in older patients withGAD also demonstrated significant symptomimprovements with CBT.'' "^

    The advantages of CBT over pharmaco-therapy include patient preference and lack oftroubling adverse eTects. Unfortunately, CBT isnot widely available, requires specialist trainingand entails weekly contact with the patient for12-20 weeks, with the latter two factors havingimplications on both cost and availability.

    9. Atypical Antipsychotics in GAD

    Evidence is emerging that atypical anti-psychotics are effective in the treatment ofpatients with anxiety disorders, either as mono-therapy or as augmentation to standard treat-ment. Aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine,risperidone and ziprasidone have all been studiedin patients with anxiety disorders or depressionand anxiety.["'"'~1 Specifically in patientswith GAD, olanzapine (n-24),'"^l risperidone(n = 40)["^l and quetiapine (n=:40)r"^] have beeninvestigated in clinical trials as augmentationtherapy and were shown to be effective in thisrole. Furthermore, quetiapine (n = 38)["^' andziprasidone (n = 13)t"^l have been studied asmonotherapy for the treatment of patients withGAD. The design and efficacy data from thesestudies of the atypical antipsychotics in GAD aresummarized in table v.[""""" Although thenumbers of patients included in these studies aresmall, the results support the potential role ofatypical antipsychotics in the treatment of GAD.

    In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of olanzapine augmentation offluoxetine, both the HAM-A and CGI-Severityof Illness response rates were statistically sig-nificantly higher than those observed in patientswho received placebo, i.e. no augmentation.t"^'Although no other differences in efficacy param-eters were seen between the treatment groups, theauthors concluded that olanzapine augmentationin patients with treatment-resistant GAD mayhave a beneficial anxiolytic effect. However, theincreased weight observed with olanzapine inthis study may be a potential problem in somepatients.

    Risperidone augmentation of anxiolytictherapies (including SSRIs, SNRIs, buspirone,benzodiazepines, gabapentin and combinationsof these drugs) has also been shown to be statis-tically significantly more effective than placebo,as assessed by the HAM-A, in patients withsymptomatic GAD.t"'^! The aim of this random-ized, doubie-bhnd, placebo-controlled study wasto explore the efficacy and safety of adjunctiverisperidone in this patient population. From thepositive results shown (effectiveness and good

    3009 Adis Doto Information BV, AH lights reserved. CNS Drugs 2009; 23 (2)

  • 114 Katzman

    c s= to

    ^ e

    s .g

    S?9 E- o

    q>

    T3

    E c tu CO -^>> .Q 'S .

    3Oo

    .S?

    to to

    CO ^ II

    -a V

    .= .y is

    (5 iS CJ

    ^ cA c^ j c

    a> X .

    ( 1 CL J 3

    . . o E' to>< ji ai lu= to .Q _j

    . .- Q> 11)

    - ^ s . S^ = ,11 S ";;L/ O C 3 ^S C O "-Q . Q o

    CDC

    stII

    Dys

    fui

    II

    tom

    T

    ESinc:

    essio

    i

    Q

    aCO

    55

    a^}a

    IIOS

    in D

    is;

    l u

    tuaix:

    II

    to ^ a) )

    2009 Adls Dcrto Information BV. All rights reserved. CNS Drugs 2009; 23 (2)

  • The Role of Atypical Antipsychotics in GAD 115

    tolerability of risperidone augmentation), theauthors recommend that additional studies beconducted in a larger sample size and for a longerduration.

    In an open-label study, Katzman et al.^"^'demonstrated that augmentation with quetiapinein patients with treatment-resistant or non-remitted GAD (i.e. patients treated for at least8 weeks with an adequate dose of antidepressant)resulted in statistically significant reductions inHAM-A total scores from baseline to week 12(-21.7; p

  • 116 Katzman

    used. Ultimately, the goal is remission and to givepeople with GAD a level playing field and a fullchance of normal health.

    11. ConclusionsTreatment guidelines recommend that first-

    hne treatment for patients with GAD shouldconsist of an antidepressant, such as an SSRI oran SNRI. The efficacy limitations of these agents,e.g. lack of response in many patients, lack of fullremission and risk of relapse, means that there isa need for alternative treatment options. Earlyclinical studies of the atypical antipsychotics,either as monotherapy or as augmentation tostandard treatment for patients with GAD, in-dicate that they may have a potential role in thetreatment of this anxiety disorder and furtherrandomized controlled studies are warranted.

    AcknowledgementsThe auttior would like to thank Jocelyn Woodcock,

    MPhil, from Complete Medical Communications, who pro-vided editorial assistance in tlie preparation of this review. Anunrestricted educational grant was provided by AstraZeneca.Dr Martin Kalzmun has received grants from Lundbeck,Wyeth, GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly. AstraZeneca, Solve,Genome Health and Pfizer. Dr Katzman has also consultedfor GlaxoSmilhKline, Wyeth, Lundbeck, AslraZeneca, EULilly, Janssen. Brislol-Myers Squibb and Shire, and has re-ceived honoraria from Wyeth, GlaxoSmithKline. Lundbeck,AstraZeneca. Eli Lilly, Janssen, Solve, Bristol Myers-Squibband Abbott.

    References1. Kessler RC. Berglund P. Demler 0. et al. Lifetime pre-

    valence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV dis-orders in ihe National Comorbidity Survey Replication.Arch Gen Psychiatry 200.^ ; 62: 593-602

    2. Wittchen HU. Generalized anxiety disorder: prevaietice,burden, and cost to society. Depress Anxiety 2002; 16:162-71

    3. Riedel M, Muller N, Strassnig M, et a. Quetiapine hasequivalent efeacy and superior tolerability to risperidonein the treatment of schizophrenia with predominantlynegative symptoms. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci2005; 255: 432-7

    4. Aasseau M, Fischler B. Dierick M, et al. Prevalence andimpact of generalized anxiety disorder and major depres-sion in primary care in Belgium and Luxemburg: theGADIS study. Eur Psychiatry 2005: 20: 229-35

    5. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statis-tical manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed.. revised.Washington. DC. American Psychiatric Association, 1987

    6. Katon W. Von KorfT M, Lin E. et al. Distressed high uti-lizers of medical care. DSM-III-R diagnoses and treat-ment needs. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1990; 12: 355-62

    7. Chartier M.Walker J, Kjemisted K. Health eare utilizationand anxiety disorders. Anxiety Disorders Association ofAmerica. 20th National Conference; 2000 Mar 23-26;Washington, DC

    8. Keller MB. The long-term clinical course of generalizedanxiety disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63 Suppl, 8: 11-6

    9. Wittchen HU. Zhao S. Kessler RC, et al, DSM-III-R gen-eralised anxiety disorder in the National ComorbiditySur\-ey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 51: 355-64

    10. Lieb R, Becker E, Altamura C. The epidemiology of gen-eralized anxiety disorder in Europe. Eur Neuropsycho-pharmaco! 2005; 15:445-52

    11. Culpepper L. Generalized anxiety disorder in primary care:emerging issues in management and treatment. J ClinPsychiatry 2002: 63 Suppl. 8: 35-42

    12. MofTitt TE, Caspi A, Harrington H. et a!. Generalizedanxiety disorder and depression: childhood risk factors ina birth cohort followed to age 32. Psycho! Med 2008; 37:441-52

    13. Biederman J. Rosenbaum JF, Hirshfeld DR. et al. Psy-chiatric correlates of behavioral inhibition in young chil-dren of parents with and without psychiatric disorders.Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990; 47: 21-6

    14. Manassis K. Bradley S. Goldberg S. et al. Behavioural in-hibition, attachment and anxiety in children of mother^with anxiety disorders. Can J Psychiatry 1995; 40: 87-92

    15. Rosenbaum JF, Biederman J. Gersten M, et al. Behavioralinhibition in children of parents with panic disorder andagoraphobia: a controlled study. Arch Gen Psychiatry1988:45:463-70

    16. Rosenbaum JF, Biederman J. Bolduc EA, et al. Co-morbidity of parental anxiety disorders as risk for child-hood-onset anxiety in inhibited children. Am S Psychiatry1992; 149:475-81

    17. Schwartz CE, Snidman N, Kagan J. Adolescent socialanxiety as an outeome of inhibited temperament inchildhood. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999; 38:1008-15

    18. Wittchen HU. Kessler RC. Pfister H, et at. Why do peoplewith anxiety disorders become depressed? A prospective-longitudinal eomniunity study. Acta Psychiatr ScandSuppl 2000; 406: 14-23

    19. Wittchen HU, Beesdo K, Bittner A, et al. Depressiveepisodes: evidence for a causal role of primary anxietydisorders? Eur Psychiatry 2003; 18: 384-93

    20. Kessler RC. Andrade LH. Bijl RV. et al- The effects of co-morbidity on the onset and persistence of generali/ftlanxiety disorder in the ICPE surveys. International Con-sortium in Psychiatric Epidemiology. Psyehol Med 2002;32: 1213-25

    21. Judd LL. Kessler RC, Paulus MP, et al. Comorbidity as afundamental feature of generalized anxiety disorders: re-sults from the National Comorbidity Study (NCS). APsychiatr Scand Suppl 1998; 393: 6-11

    2009 Adis Data Intormaiton BV. All rights reserved. CNS Drugs 2009; 23 (2)

  • The Role of Atypical Anlipsychotics in GAD 117

    22, American Psychialric Associaiion. Diagnostic and siatis-lical manual of mental disorders. 4lh ed. Washington.DC: American Psychialric Association, 1994

    2.1. Carter RM, Witlchen HU. Pfister H. et al. One-yearprevalence of subthreshold and threshold DSM-IVgeneralized anxiety disorder in a nationally representativesample. Depress Anxiety 2001; 13: 78-S8

    24. Hasler G. Pine DS. Gamma A. et al. The associations be-tween psychapathology and being overweight: a 20-yearprospective study. Psychol Med 2004; 34; 1047-57

    25. Stein DJ. Comorbidty in generalized anxiety disorder; impactand implications- J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62 Suppl. 11 ; 29-34

    26. Simon NM. Otto MW, Wisniewski SR. et al. Anxiety dis-order comorbidity in bipolar disorder patients; data fromthe first 500 participants in the Systematic TreatmentEnhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD).Am J Psychiatry 2004: 161: 2222-9

    27. Henning ER. Turk CL, Mennin DS, et al. Impairment andquality of life in individuals with generalized anxiety dis-order. Depress Anxiety 2007; 24: 342-9

    2. Frisch MB. Cornell J, Villaneuva M, et al. Clinical valida-tion of the Quality of Life Inventory; a measure of lifesatisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcomeassessment. Psychol Assess 1992; 4; 92-101

    29. Wittchen HU. Carter RM, Pfister H, et al. Disabilities andquality of life in pure and comorbid generalized anxietydisorder and major depression in a national survey. IntClin Psychopharmacol 2000; 15; 319-28

    30. Wells KB. Stewart A, Hays RD. et al. The functioning andwell-being of depressed patients: results from the MedicalOutcomes Study. JAMA 1989: 262; 914-9

    31. Kessler RC, DuPont RL. Berglund P. et al. Impairment inpure and comorbid generalized anxiety disorder andmajor depression at 12 months in two national surveys.Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 1915-23

    32. Hoffman DL, Dukes EM. Wittchen HU. Human andeconomic burden of generalized anxiety disorder. DepressAnxiety 2008: 25; 72-90

    33. Ware Jr JE. Sherboume CD. The MOS 36-tem short-formhealth survey (SF-36}; 1. Conceptual framework and itemselection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-83

    34. Bernai M. Haro JM, Bernert S. et al. Risk factors forsuicidality in Europe; Results from the ESEMED study.J Affect Disord 2006; 101; 27-34

    35. Bruce SE, Machan JT. Dyck I, et al, Infrequency of "pure"GAD; impact of psychiatric comorbidity on clinicalcourse. Depress Anxiety 2001; 14: 219-25

    36. Hettema JM, Kuhn JW, Prescott CA. et al. The impact ofgeneralized anxiety disorder and stressful hfe events on riskfor major depressive epistxies. Psychol Med 2006: 36: 789-95

    37. Nutt D, .^rgyropoulos S. Hood S, et al. Generalizedanxiety disorder: a comorbid disease. Eur Neuropsycho-pharmacol 2006: 16 Suppl. 2; S1O9-I8

    3S. Wittchen HU. Kessler RC. Beesdo K. et al. Generalizedanxiety and depression in primary care: prevalence, re-cognition, and management, J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63Suppl. 8; 24-34

    39, Wittchen HU. Nelson CB. Lachner G. Prevalence of men-tal disorders and psychosocial impairments in adolescentsand young adults. Psychol Med 1998: 28; 109-26

    40. Lim D. Sanderson K. Andrews G. Lost productivityamong full-time workers with mental disorders. J MentHealth Policy Econ 2000; 3; 139-46

    41. Marciniak MD, Lage MJ. Dunayevich E. et ai. The cost oftreating anxiety; the medical and demographic correlatesthat impact total medical costs. Depress Anxiety 2005:21 :178-84

    42. Smit F. Ctiijpers P, Oostenbrink J, et al. Costs of ninecommon mental disorders; implications for curative andpreventive psychiatry. J Menl Health Policy Econ 2006; 9:193-200

    43. Souetre E, Lozet H, Cimarosti I, et al. Cost of anxietydisorders; impact of comorbidity. J Psychosom Res 1994;38 Suppl, 1; 151-60

    44. Lothgren M. Economic evidence in anxiety disorders;a review, Eur J Health Econ 2004; 5 Suppl. I: S20-5

    45. Buhr K, Dugas MJ, The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale;psychometric properties of the English version. Behav ResTher 2002; 40; 931-45

    46. Dugas M J, Marchand A. Ladouceur R. Further validationof a cognitive-behavioral model of generalized anxietydisorder; diagnostic and symptom specificity. J AnxietyDisord 2005; 19; 329-43

    47. Canadian Psychiatric Association. Management of anxietydisorders. Can J Psychiatry 2006; 51 Suppl. 2; 1-93S

    48. World Health Organization. International statistical classi-llcation of diseases. lOth rev. Vol. 3. Geneva: WoridHealth Organization. 1992

    49. World Health Organization. International statistical clas-sification of diseases. 10th rev. Vol. 3, 2nd rev. Geneva;World Health Organization. 2005

    50. Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating,Br J Med Psychol 1959: 32: 50-5

    51. Ruscio AM. ChiuWT, Roy-Byrne P, et al. Broadening thedefinition of generalized anxiety disorder: effects onprevalence and associations with other disorders in theNational Comorbidity Survey Replication. 3 AnxietyDisord 2007; 21; 662-76

    52. Argyropoulos SV, Ploubidis GB, Wright T, et al. Deve-lopment and validation of the Generalized Anxiety Dis-order Inventory (GADI). J Psychopharmacol 2007; 21:145-52

    53. Spitzer RL. Kroenke K, Williams JB. et al, A brief measurefor assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7,Arch Intem Med 2006; 166: 1092-7

    54. Meyer TJ. Miller ML, Metzger RL, et al. Development andvalidation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. BehavRes Ther 1990; 28; 487-95

    55. Ballenger JC. Overview of different pharmacotherapies forattaining remission in generalized anxiety disorder. J ClinPsychiatry 2001; 62 Suppl. 19; 11-9

    56. Gorman JM, Hirschfeld RM. Ninan PT. New develop-ments in the neurobiological basis of anxiety disorders.Psychopharmacol Bull 2002; 36 Suppl. 2; 49-67

    57. Weizman R, Tanne Z, Granek M. et al. Peripheral benzo-diazepine binding sites on platelet membranes are in-creased during diazepam treatment of anxious patietits.Eur J Pharmacol 1987; 138; 289-92

    58. Rocca P, Beoni AM, Eva C, et al. Peripheral benzodiaze-pine receptor messenger RNA is decreased in lymphocytes

    2009 Adis Data Information BV. Ail rigiits reswved. CNS Dfgs 2009; 23 (2)

  • 118 Katzman

    of generalized anxiety disorder patients. Biol Psychiatry1998; 43: 767-73

    59. Vamas K. Halldin C. Hall H. Autoradiographic distri-bution of serotonin transporters and receptor subtypes inhuman brain. Hum Brain Mapp 2004: 22: 246-60

    60. Null DJ. Anlidepressanls in panic disorder: clinical andpreclinical mechanistiis, J Clin Psychiatry 1998: 59 Suppl.8:24-8

    61. Scherrer JF. True WR. Xian H. Evidence for genetic in-fluences common and specific to symptoms of generalizedanxiety and panic. J Affect Disord 2(H)0: 57: 25-35

    62. Hettema JM. Prescott CA. Kendler KS- A population-based tAin 5tudy of generalized anxiety disorder in menand women, J Nerv Ment Dis 2001; 189: 413-20

    63. Kendler KS. Gardner CO, Gatz M, el al. The sources ofco-morbidity between major depression and generalizedanxiety disorder in a Swedish national twin sample.Psycho! Med 2007; 37: 453-62

    64. Bandelow B. Zohar J. Hollander E. et al. World Federationof Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelinesfor the pharmacological treatment of anxiety, obsessive-compulsive and post-lraumatic stress disorders. World JBiol Psychiatry 2002: 3: 171-99

    65. Baldwin SH. Anderson IM. Nutt DJ. et al. Evidence-basedguidelines for the pharmacological treatment of anxiety dis-orders: recommendations from the British Association forP.sychopharmacology. J Ps\'chopharmacol 2005; 19: 567-96

    66. NICE guidelines. Anxiety: management of anxieiy (panicdisorder, wilh or without agoraphobia, and generalisedanxiety disorder) in adults in primary, secondary andcommunity care. London: National Institute for Healthand Clinical F.xcellcnce. 2004 Dec

    67. Rickels K. Rynn M, Iyengar M, el al. Remission of gen-eralized anxiety disorder: a review of the paroxetine clin-ical trials database. J Clin Psychiatry 2006: 67: 41-7

    68. Guy W. Clinical global impressions. In; Guy W. editor.ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology.Rockville (MD): US National Institute of Health. 1976:218-22

    69. Rickels K, Zaninelli R. McCafferty J. et a!. Paroxetinetreatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a double-blind,placebo-controlled study. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 749-56

    70. Pollack MH. Zaninelli R. Goddard A. et a!. Paroxetine inthe treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: results of aplaccbo-conirolled. flexible-dosage trial. J Clin Psychiatry2001; 62: 350-7

    7t. Hewett K. Adams A, Bryson H. el al. Generalised anxietydisorder: efficacy of paroxetine [poster]. 7th World Con-gress of Biological Psychiatry: 2001 Jul 1-6: Berlin

    72. Stocchi F. Nordera G, Jokinen RH. et a!. Efficacy andtolerability of paroxetine for the long-term treatment ofgeneralized anxiety disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2003: 64:250-8

    73. Davidson JR. Bose A. Korotzer A, et al. Escitalopram inthe treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: double-blind, placebo controlled, flexible-dose study. DepressAnxiety 2004; 19:234-40

    74. Allgulander C. Florea I. Huusom AK. Prevention of re-lapse in generalized anxiety disorder by escitalopramtreatment. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2006: 9: 495-505

    75. Brawman-MintzerO, Knapp RG, Rynn M,etal. Serlralint'treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized,doubie-bllnd. placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry2006:67:874-81

    76. Allgulander C. Dahl AA. Austin C. et al. Efficacy of ser-traline in a 12-week trial for generalized anxieiy disorderAm J Psychiatry 2004: 161: 1642-9

    77. Ball SG, Kuhn A, Wall D. et al. Selective serotoninreuptake inhibitor treaiment for generalized anxietydisorder: a double-blind, prospective comparison bet-ween paroxetine and sertraline. J Clin Psychiatry 2005:66:94-9

    78. Gelenberg AJ, Lydiard RB. Rudolph RL. et al. Efficacy ofvenlafaxine ex tended-release capsules in nondepressedoutpatients with generalized anxiety disorder: a 6-monthrandomized controlled trial- JAMA 2000: 283: 3082-8

    79. Nimatoudis I. Zissis NP. Kogeorgos J, el al. Remissionrates with venlafaxine extended release in Greek out-patients wilh generalized anxiety disorder: a double-blind,randomized, placebo controlled study. Int Clin Psycho-phumiacol 2004; 19:331-6

    80. Lenox-Smith AJ, Reynolds A. A double-blind, rando-mised, placebo controlled study of venlafaxine XL in pa-tients with generalised anxiety disorder in primary care.BrJ Gen Pract 2003; 53: 772-7

    81. Eli Lilly and Company. Study suggests Cymbalta signif-icantly reduces core anxieiy symptoms of generalised an-xiety disorder, 2006 Mar 24 [online]. Available fromURL: www.pmewswire.com [Accessed 2008 Nov 13]

    82. Allgulander C, Hartford J, Russell J. et al. Pharmacother-apy of generalized anxiety disorder: results of duloxetim-treatment from a pooled analysis of three clinical trials,Curr Med Res Opin 2(K)7: 23 (6): 1245-52

    83. Hartford J, Kornstein S. Liebowitz M, el al. Duloxetine asan SNRI treatment for generalized anxiety disorder:results from a placebo and active-controlled trial. Int ClinPsychopharmacol 2007: 22: 167-74

    84. Lauer D. Hnlzel L, Hornyak M. Generalized anxiety dis-order with comorbidity: treaiment with pregabalin inGermanl. Nervenarzt 2006; 77 (11): 1363-7

    85. Frampton JE. Foster RH. Pregabatin: in the treatment ofgeneralised anxiety disorder. CNS Drugs 2006: 20: 685-93

    86. Montgomery SA. Tobias K. Zornberg GL. et al. Efficacyand safety of pregabalin in the treatment of generalisedanxiety disorder: a 6-week, muiticenter, randomized,double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of prega-balin and venlafaxine. J Clin Psychiatry 2006; 67: 771-82

    87. Chessick CA, Allen MH. Thase M. et al. Azapirones forgeneralized anxiety disorder. Cochrane Database SystRev20O6;(3):CD0O6115

    88. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxieiy and Dep-ression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983: 67: 361-70

    89. Davidson JR, DuPont RL, Hedges D, et al. Efficacy,safety, and toierability of venlafaxine extended releaseand buspirone in outpatients with generalized anxietydisorder. J Clin Psychiatry 1999: 60: 528-35

    90. Pollack MH. Worlhington JJ, Manfro GG, et al. Abecarnilfor the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a ptacebo-contmlled comparison of two dosage ranges of abecarniland buspirone. J Clin Psychiatry 1997: 58 Suppl. 11: 19-23

    2tX)9 AcSs Doto Information av. All rights reserved. CNS Drugs 2009: 23 C2)

  • The Role of Atypical Antipsychotics in GAD 119

    91. Struzik L. Vermani M, Coonerty-Femiano A. et al. Treat-ments ftnr generalized anxiety disorder. Expert RevNeurother 2004; 4: 285-94

    92. Rickels K. Downing R. Schweizer E. et al. Antidepressantsfor the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled comparison of imipramine. trazodone, anddiazepam. Arch Gen Psychiatry' !993; 50; 884-95

    93. Roerig JL. Diagnosis and management of generalizedanxiely disorder. J Am Pharm Assoc 1999; 39: 811-21

    94. Pollack MH. Optimizing pharmacoiherapy of generalizedanxiety disorder to achieve remission. J Clin Psychiatry2001: 62 Suppl. 19:20-5

    95. Kennedy SH, Lam RW. Cohen NL, el al. Clinical guide-lines for the treatment of depressive disorders: IV. Medi-cations and other biological treatments. Can J Psychiatry2001: 46 Suppl. I:38-58S

    9ft. Gahimer J, Wcrnicke J, Yalcin I. et al. A retrospectivepooled analysis of duloxetine safety in 23.983 subjects.Curr Med Res Opin 2007: 23: 175-84

    97. Thase M E. Treaimeni of anxiety disorders with venlafaxineXR. Expert Rev Neurother 2006; 6: 269-82

    98. Himei A. Okamura T. Discontinuation syndrome asso-ciated with paroxetine in depressed patients: a retro-spective analysis of factors involved in the occurrence ofthe syndrome. CNS Drugs 2006: 20: 665-72

    99. Perahia DG, Kajdasz DK. Desaiah D. et al. Symptomsfollowing abrupt discontinuation of duloxetine treatmentin patients with major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord2005; 89: 207-12

    100. Joint Formulary Committee. British national fonnulary.52nd ed. London: British Medical Association and RoyalPharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. 2006

    101. FDA Puhlic Health Advisory. Suicidality in childrenand adolescents being treated with anlidepressant medi-cations, 2004 Oct 15 [online]. Available from URL:www.fda.gov/cder/dRig/antidepressanL'i/SSRIPHA20040.htm[Accessed 2008 Nov 13|

    102. FDA. FDA proposes new warnings about suicidal think-ing, behavior in young adults who take antidepressantmedications [online]. Available from URL: www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2007/NEW01624.htmI [Accessed 2008Sep 25)

    103. Tiihonen J. Lonnqvist J, Wahlbeck K, et al. Anti-depressants and the risk of suicide, attempted suicide, andoverall mortality in a nationwide cohort. Arch Gen Psy-chiatrv'2006: 63: 1358-67

    104. Lang AJ. Treating generalized anxiety disorder withcognitive-behavioral therapy. J Clin Psychiatry 2004; 65Suppl. 13: 14-9

    105. Hunot V. Churchill R. Silva DL, et al. Psychologicaltherapies for generalised anxiety disorder. CochraneDatabase Syst Rev 2007; (1): CD001848

    06. Borkovec TD. Ruscio AM. Psychotherapy for generalizedanxiety disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62 Suppl. II:37^2

    107. Chambless DL. Gillis MM. Cognitive therapy of anxietydisorders. J Consult Clin Psychol 1993; 61: 248-60

    108. Borkovec TD, Whisman MA. Psychosodal treatment forgeneralized anxiety disorder. In: Mavissakalian MR,Prieii RF, editors. Long-term treatments of anxiety

    disorders. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Press,1996: 171-99

    109. Arntz A. Cognitive therapy versus applied relaxation astreatment of generalized anxiety disorder. Bchav Res Ther2003:41:633-46

    110. Stanley MA, Beck JG, Novy DM. et at. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of late-life generalized anxietydisorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003; 71: 309-19

    111. Mohlman J, Gorenstein EE, Kleber M. tal. Standard andenhanced cognitive-behavior therapy for tale-life gene-ralized anxiety disorder: two pilot investigations. Am JGeriatr Psychiatry 2003; 11: 24-32

    112. Worthington Ul JJ, Kinrys G. Wygant LE. et al. Aripi-prazole as an augmentor of selective serotonin reuptkeinhibitors In depression and anxiety disorder patients. IntClin Psychopharmacol 2005; 20: 9-11

    113. Giilynker I, Khan A, Grebchenko Y. et at. Low-dose ris-peridone and quetiapine as monotherapy for comorbidanxiety and depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2005: 66: 544

    114. Brawman-Mintzer O, Knapp RG, Nietert PJ. Adjunctiverisperidone in generalized anxiety disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controtled study. J Clin Psychiatry 2005;66: 1321-5

    115. Pollack MH, Simon NM, Zaita AK. et al. Olanzapineaugmentation of fluoxeline for refractory generalized an-xiety disorder: a placebo controlled study. Biol Psychiatry2006:59:211-5

    116. Brawman-Mintzer O. Nietert PJ. Rynn M, et al. Quetia-pine monotherapy in patients with GAD [abstract no.NR634]. American Psychiatric Association 159th AnnualMeeting: 2006 May 20-25; Toronto (ON)

    117. KatzmanM. Vermani M.Jacobs L. et al. The use of quetia-pine as an adjunct in the pharmacotherapy of generalisedanxiety disorder: a flexible-dose, open-label trial [poster].7th International Forum on Mood and Anxiety Dis-orders; 2007 Dec 5-7; Budapest

    118. Snyderman SH, Rynn MA. Rickels K. Open-label pilotstudy of ziprasidone for refractory generalized anxielydisorder. J Clin Psychopharmacot 005: 25: 497-9

    119. Crane DL. Ziprasidone as an augmenting agent in thetreatment of anxiety-spectrum disorders. CNS Sptr2005; 10: 176-9

    120. Simon NM, Hoge EA, Fischmann D. et al. An open-labeltrial of risperidone augmentation for refractory anxietydisorders. J Clin Psychiatry 2006; 67: 381-5

    121. Reiss S. Peterson RA, Gursky M, et al. Anxiety sensitivity,anxiety frequency and the prediction of fearfulness. BehavRes Ther 1986; 24: 1-8

    122. Morin CM. Insomnia: psychological assessment and man-agement. New York (NY): Guilford. 1993

    123. Hedlund JL, Viewig BW. Hamilton rating scale for de-pression: a comprehensive review. J Oper Psychiatry 1979;10: 149-65

    124. Montgomery SA. Asberg M. A new depression scale de-signed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatrj' 1979; 134:382-9

    125. Buysse DJ. Reynolds III CF, Monk TH, et al. The Pitts-burgh Steep Quality Index: a new instrument for psy-chiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989; 28:193-213

    2009 Adls DcJta Intormatton 6V. All rights reserved. CNS Drugs 2009; 23 (2)

  • 120 Katzman

    126. Endicott J, Nee J. Harrison W, et al. Quality of Life Enjoy-ment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: a new measure.Psychopharmacol Bull 1993; 29: 321-6

    127. Sheehan DV. The anxiety disease. New York (NY):Charles Scribner's Sons. 1983

    128. Leon AC, Shear MK. Portera L, et al. Assessing impair-ment in patients with panic disorder: the Sheehan Dis-ability Scale. Soc Psychiatry Epidemiol 1992; 27: 78-82

    129. Calabrese JR. Keck Jr PE, Macfadden W. et al. A rando-mized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of quetia-pine in the treatment of bipolar I or II depression. Am JPsychiatry 2005; 162: 1351-60

    130. Thase M. MacFaddenW. McCoy R, et al. Efllcacy of queti-apine monotherapy in bipolar depression: a confirmatorydouble-blind, placebo-controlled study (the BQLDER IISiudy). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2006; 9: S237

    131. Carson WH, KJtagawa H.Nemeroff CB. Dru^ developmentfor anxiety disorders: new roles for atypical anti-psychotics. Psychopharmacol Bull 2004; 38 Suppl. 1: 38-45

    132. Masand PS, Narasimhan M. Improving adherence to anti-psychotic pharmacotherapy. Curr Clin Pharmacol 2006;1:47-56

    133. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statis-tical manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed. Washington,DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1980

    134. Bremner JD. Traumatic stress: effects on the brain. Dia-logues Clin Neurosci 2006; 8: 445-61

    135. Bremner JD. Stress and brain atrophy. CNSNeurol DisordDrug Targets 2006; 5: 503-12

    136. Zhang L. Zhou R. Li X. et al. Stress-inducetl change ofmitochondria membrane potential regulated by genomicand non-genomic GR signaling: a possible mechanism forhippocampus atrophy in PTSD. Med Hypotheses 2006;66: 1205-8

    137. Kalisch R. Schubert M. Jacob W. et al. Anxiety and hippo-campus volume in the rat. Neuropsychopharmacology2006; 31: 925-32

    138. Ballenger JC. Treatment of anxiety disorders to remission.J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62 Suppl. 12: 5-9

    139. Rector NA, Szacun-Shimizu K. Leybman M. Anxietysensitivity within the anxiety disorders: disorder-specificsensitivities and depression comorbidity. Behav Res Ther2007; 45 (8): 1967-75

    Correspondence: Dr Martin A. Katzman, START Clinic forMood and the Anxiety Disorders, 900 - 790 Bay St, Toronto.Ontario M5G 1N8, Canada.E-mail: [email protected]

    2009 Adis Data Information BV. All tights feserved. CNS Drugs 2009; 23 (2)