gareth williams using iso standards to manage energy
TRANSCRIPT
How to use the ISO standards effectively to manage energy and environmental performance
Gareth Williams Energy and Environment Manager
14/04/2016
Northern – Overview
Title // By
• Originally formed in 2004
• Steady state franchise.
• Largest Train Operating Company (TOC)
• Serco and Abellio 50:50 JV
• Passenger Growth circa 50%
• New 9 year franchise started 1st April 2016.
• Arriva owned
• Second largest TOC
Northern – New Franchise
Title // By
• Over £1bn of investment
• Introduction of 281 new carriages and the full refurbishment of the remaining fleet.
• More than 2,000 additional services each week
• Staffing 46 stations across the network which are currently unstaffed.
• Extensive station upgrade plans.
Why we have an EMS
Title // By
➢ Help manage our environmental risks and legislative compliance
➢ Improve our reputation with customers and stakeholders
➢ Meet direct requirements within our contract with the Department for Transport
➢ Ensure we are continually improving environmental performance even with growth
➢ Ultimately making the business more efficient
• Respect & Integrity - 3rd party verified
• Leadership
• Engagement / Commitment & Responsibility
• Credibility - reporting to the Board
• Investment – for monitoring and performance improvement
• Ultimately - Improved Performance
• Continual Improvement
ISO Certification Benefits
Leadership – Start at the top• New MD, new business scorecard – environment is
integrated • New Structure – Safety and Environment Directorate • Job titles – Safety and Environment Director • ISO standards – something to shout about but also
something to lose
Governance Structure
SEG – Safety Executive Group
ERG – Environment Review Group
EMS WG – Environmental Management System
Working Group
Engagement / Commitment & Responsibility
Title // By
Energy Budgets GIVE RESPONSIBILITY TO THE BUSINESS DIRECTORATES
WHICH USE THE SIGNIFICANT ENERGY CONSUMPTION
• Customer Services Director • Service Delivery Director (Operations and Engineering)
ISO 50001 - 2011
Title // By
➢ Energy focus, no longer risk management but proactive efficiency work. Reducing our energy costs reduces the bottom line. Environmental improvement actually helped the business be more financially viable and therefore help meet the company finance KPI. We were helpful.
➢ This required leadership buy in, this meant reporting to the board every 4 weeks.
➢ This coupled with CRC put the cost of energy and the impact that we were having on the board of directors radar.
➢ Energy information was cascaded to all site managers - the business was responsible for energy reduction not just the environment team. This meant that more people were working on reducing energy making a bigger impact.
'-
13,000,000
26,000,000
39,000,000
52,000,000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
15% reductionEnergy Reduction
Department ProjectsSafety & Environment 33Operations 10Customer Service 30Programmes and Planning 7Finance 8HR 5Engineering 7Commercial 4 104
Continual Improvement