garuda indonesia financial analysis
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
1/27
F I N A L PA P E RI n t r o d u c t o r y A c c o u n t i n g I I
PT. Garuda Indonesia
Page 1
Prepared for: Ibu Desti Fitriani S.E., Ak., M.A., CPMA
Course:Introductory Accounting II (ACCT 11103)
Date of Submission: Thursday, June 12, 2014
Prepared by:
Abdul Robby Nabi (1306387286)
Filip Ferdi (1306438785)
Melvin Hade (1306388364)
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
2/27
TABLE OF CONTENT
Statement of Authorship 3
Executive Summary 4
Chapter 1: Company Profile 5
Chapter 2: Financial Analysis 6
2A. Horizontal Analysis 7
2B. Vertical Analysis 9
2C. Ratio Analysis 11
Chapter 3: Conclusion 14
Chapter 4: Appendix 15
4A. Horizontal Analysis Calculation 16
4B. Vertical Analysis Calculation 20
4C. Ratio Analysis Calculation 24
Page 2
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
3/27
STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP
We, the signatories signing under this statement, states that the work
that is attached to this Statement of Authorship is purely my own work
without any other contribution from other parties, unless it is clearly
cited and stated in this work.
This work has also never been published or used for any other purposes
or classes and that the materials presented on this paper has not been
presented at any other occasion.
We are also aware that this paper could be multiplied for the sake of
identifying the chance of plagiarism.
Page 3
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
4/27
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This paper was prepared to fulfill the requirement of the course
Introductory Accounting II with Ibu Desti Fitriani S.E., Ak., M.A., CPMA.
Garuda Indonesia is a national airline service provider in Indonesia that
offers full-service airline. This paper will assess Garuda Indonesias
financial performance for the year 2011 and 2012 and different
analytical tool will be used to analyze Garuda Indonesias performance
such as Horizonta l Analysis, Vertical Analysis and Ratio Analysis.
Garuda Indonesia has performed tremendously well in both years,
especially in 2012 because it has successfully managed to improve
various financial indicators as well as boosting sales and net income.
They also have better liquidity position as well as solvency and
profitability level. However, one hinderance that prevents Garuda
Indonesia from getting a st ra ight A performance is that the market
expects Garuda Indonesia to be associated with higher risk in the future
due to a decrease in their Price-Earning ratio. Other than that, Garuda
Indonesia has performed exceptionally well.
Page 4
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
5/27
CHAPTER 1: COMPANY PROFILE
PT. Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk, (formerly known as Garuda Indonesian
Airways) is a state-owned airline based in Jakarta that was launched in 1949. It
offers more than 42 domestic flights and 24 international flights in first class,
business class and economy class. Garuda Indonesia provides is a full-service
airline, but they also have a low-cost subsidiary called PT. Citilink Indonesia to
serve domestic routes in Indonesia. As of 2012, the company has a total of 106
fleets, ranging from Boeing 747-400, Airbus 330-300, Boeing 737 Classic, etc. In
2012, the Garuda Indonesia group carried a total of more than 20 million
passengers. The airline has complied with international safety standards given by
international institution such as the IATA (International Air Transport Association).
Garuda Indonesia was awarded Worlds Most Improved Airline by Skytrax World
Airline Awards in 2010. And in 2012, based on Roy Morgan research company,
Garuda Indonesia has been recognized as the Best International Airline among allmajor airline in the world with 91 percent of the respondents being very satisfied.
Last but not least, in 2013 Garuda Indonesia was awarded the Worlds Best
Economy Class for its service and products by Skytrax.
Page 5
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
6/27
CHAPTER 2: FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
A. Horizontal Analysis
B. Vertical Analysis
C. Ratio Analysis
Page 6
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
7/27
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
8/27
of Property and Equipment by 360.6%. This drives the net increase of Total Other
Comprehensive Income by 307.9%. This situation brings Garuda Indonesia to
record a 100% net increase in Total Comprehensive Income between 2011 and
2012, resulting a $14.5 million in 2012.
Next, we could turn our heads to the Comparative Balance Sheet. In 2012, Garuda
Indonesia financed its operation mainly through Long-Term Loans as much as
$300 million. However, they have managed to reduce the amount of Bank Loans
in 2012 by 83.96%, while Long-Term Loans has increased between 2011 and 2012
by 63.91%. This data shows that Garuda Indonesia has shifted its financing
scheme by having less Bank Loans and increase Long-term Loans in 2012. Total
Asset for Garuda Indonesia also increased by 55.28% in 2012, in comparison to
2011 and this was mainly driven by the increase in Cash as much as 148.78%.
By now, we should get a picture of how Garuda Indonesia has performed in both
2011 and 2012 and how they have shifted their financing sources proportion. We
also understand that they have performed extensively well in terms of sales and in
order to give a more detailed understanding of Garuda Indonesias performance
in 2011 and 2012, we will now take a look at the Vertical Analysis.
Page 8
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
9/27
2B. VERTICAL ANALYSIS
Under Vertical Analysis, 2011 will be the base year where the base amount of 100
will be set to both Total Asset as well as Total Liabilities plus Equity. The Vertical
Analysis is useful in understanding the composition of a particular account. For
example, we could clearly understand where the greatest portion of the Total
Asset is coming from under the Vertical Analysis.
There are several highlights that should be pointed out under theVertical Analysis
of Garuda Indonesias performance in 2011 and 2012. The first highlight is that
we should be aware that there is a slight decrease in the proportion of the Current
Asset towards Total Asset. In 2011, the proportion of Current Asset towards Total
Asset is 26.03%, but in 2012, this number has decreased to 25.28%. This will then
clearly change the proportion of Garuda Indonesias Non-Current Asset towards
Total Asset between 2011 and 2012. In 2011, the proportion of Non-Current Asset
towards Total Asset is 73.97%, while the proportion has slightly increased in 2012
to 74.72%. Hence, the first highlight is that there is an increase in the proportion
of Non-Current Asset towards the Total Asset which means that there is a decrease
in the proportion of Current Asset towards Total Asset in 2012, compared to 2011.
The next highlight that we can point out is under the Liabilities and Equity
Account. There is also changes in the proportion of Current Liabilities, Non-
Current Liabilities as well as Equity towards the Total Liabilities and Equity account.
In 2011, the proportion of Current Liabilities towards the Total Liabilities and
Equity is 35.2%, however in 2012, this proportion has decreased to only 30%. This
also goes for the proportion of Non-Current Liabilities towards Total Liabilities and
Page 9
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
10/27
Equity where in 2011, the proportion of Non-Current Liabilities towards Total
Liabilities and Equity was 34.2%, while in 2012 this number has decreased to
25.8%. The proportion of Total Liabilities has now decreased in 2012, in
comparison to 2011 and this means that there is an increase in the proportion of
Total Equity towards Total Liabilities and Equity. The proportion of Total Equity
towards Total Liabilities and Equity has increased from 30.6% in 2011 to 44.3% in
2012. Hence, the second highlight under the Vertical Analysis is that the
proportion of both, the Non-Current Liabilities and the Current Liabilities has
decreased towards Total Liabilities and Equity and the proportion of Total Equity
has increased.
Under the Comparative Income Statement, the base year will also be set to the
year 2011, but the base year amount of 100 will be set to Total Operating
Revenue. In 2011, the proportion of Total Operating Expense towards Total
Operating Revenues is as high as 97%. This means that 97% of the Total
Operating Revenues is transformed into the form of an expense, while the
remaining 3% becomes the Income from Operations of Garuda Indonesia in 2011.
The highlight that should be made is that the proportion of Total Operating
Expense in 2012 has decreased from 97% in 2011 to 95.2% in 2012. This means
that in 2012, the proportion of Total Operating Expense is only 95.2% towards
Total Operating Revenues. This is a good indicator because this means that
Garuda Indonesia has reduced the proportion of its Operating Expense towards
the Total Operating Revenues. Thus, the proportion of Income from Operation
towards Operating Revenues in 2012 has increased to 4.8% in 2012, in
comparison to 3.0% in 2011. This fact also confirmsthe increase in Net Income of
the Year for Garuda Indonesia in 2012.
Page 10
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
11/27
2C. RATIO ANALYSIS
The first point that should be highlighted is that Garuda Indonesia is an airline
service company that does not have any Inventories as well as Cost of Goods Sold
in their Financial Report. Hence, there are some Ration Analysis indicators that
cannot be satisfied, due to the fact that Garuda Indonesia operates in the service
industry.
We could start by analyzing the profitability of Garuda Indonesia in the year 2011
and 2012. The first Ratio Analysis that we can conduct to analyze Garuda
Indonesia profitability level is the Profit Margin Analysis. In 2011, the profit margin
of Garuda Indonesia has a value of 0.0207, but this value has increased in 2012 to
0.0319. This analysis confirms the statement under the Vertical Analysis where the
proportion of Income from Operations towards Total Operating Revenue has
increased between 2011 and 2012. Hence, it is confirmed by this ratio analysis
that Garuda Indonesia has experienced a greater Profit Margin in 2012, in
comparison to 2011.
This then goes on to the Return on Total Asset Analysis. Return on Total Asset
Analysis reflects Garuda Indonesias ability to use its asset to generate sales and is
a great indicator of Garuda Indonesias efficiency. Since Garuda Indonesia
recorded a higher Net Income in 2012, in comparison to 2011, the Return on Total
Assethas increased from the value of 0.03 in 2011 to 0.05 in 2012. This means
that Garuda Indonesia recorded a greater portion of Net Income towards its
Average Total Asset, and this is a positive indicator for the performance of Garuda
Indonesia.
Page 11
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
12/27
We could now also analyze Garuda Indonesias liquidity indicators, by looking at
their Current Ratio as well asAcid-Test Ratio. Under the Current Ratio Analysis, we
could see that Garuda Indonesia has improved its current ratio analysis that can
be seen by the increase in its current ratio from 0.74 to 0.84. The increase in the
current ratio of Garuda Indonesia shows that Garuda Indonesia have a stronger
liquidity position and that it has better abilities in fulfilling current obligation and
liabilities. Moreover, we could also take a look at the Acid-Test Ratio analysis
where they have managed to improve theirAcid-Test Ratio from a value of 0.49 to
0.61. Acid-Test Ratio assess the most liquid items and this shows that Garuda
Indonesia has a well short-term liquidity position.
Next, we will review Garuda Indonesias solvency performance, through the Debt
to Equity ratio and Time Interest Earned. The solvency test is basically to analyze
Garuda Indonesias ability to cover long-term obligations. Under the Debt toEquity ratio, Garuda Indonesia has managed to improve its solvency performance.
The Debt to Equity value of Garuda Indonesia in 2011 is 2.26, but it has
significantly decrease in 2012 to 1.25. This is mainly driven by a greater increase
in the proportion of Total Equity in comparison to the increase in Total Liabilities. A
decrease of Debt to Equity ratio from 2.26 in 2012 to 1.25 in 2011 shows that
Garuda Indonesia has better ability in fulfilling long-term obligation and this
means that the business is less risky. The Time Interest Earned Ratio is also another
indicator to test Garuda Indonesias solvency performance. This ratio reflects the
risk of Garuda Indonesias creditor in loan repayments with interest. In 2011, the
time interest earned for Garuda Indonesia has a value of 4.3 and this value has
increased to 8.49 in 2012. The greater value of this ratio shows that Garuda
Indonesia has greater Income before Tax and Interest to settle its Interest Expense.
This also means that Garuda Indonesia is less risky for creditors to issue loans. This
Page 12
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
13/27
ratio also shows that Garuda Indonesia has a good solvency performance and up
to now, Garuda Indonesia has performed tremendously well.
Last but not least is the Market Prospect Ratio which assess the markets
expectation for Garuda Indonesia and this test could be assessed by using the
Price-Earning Ratio. The Price-Earning Ratio can also be viewed as an indicator of
the markets expected growth and risk for a share. Garuda Indonesias Price
Earning Ratio has decreased from 2011 to 2012 from a value of 10.3 in 2011 to a
value of 8.16 in 2012. The lower Price-Earning Ratio in 2012 in comparison to
2011 shows that the market expects Garuda Indonesia to have higher risk in the
future. This test shows that Garuda Indonesia is expected to be more risky in the
future and this is the only aspect that Garuda Indonesia did not perform well on.
Therefore, we can conclude under the Ratio Analysis that Garuda Indonesia has
performed tremendously well in improving their liquidity, profitability and
solvency ratios, however it has a problem in the eyes of the market prospect
where the market sees Garuda Indonesia to be more riskier in the future.
However, overall, Garuda Indonesia has performed well, driven by lower
Operating Expense, higher Income from Operations, lower level of Liabilitiesand
higher level of Equity.
CHAPTER 3: CONCLUSION
Page 13
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
14/27
In conclusion, we could conclude that in the year 2012, Garuda Indonesia enjoy a
greater amount of Income, due to the reduction in the proportion of Operating
Expense towards Operating Revenues. This fact is also confirmed with the
profitability ratio where their Net Profit Margin increases between 2011 and 2012.
Garuda Indonesia also manage to reduce the level of debt (liabilities) that it holds
and increases the level of Equity which results in a better solvency position for the
company. Garuda Indonesias liquidity position also improve which means that
they have better abilities in meeting current obligation. Despite its staggeringly
good performance in 2012, the market sees that Garuda Indonesia will be riskier
in the future and this is shown from the Price-Earning Ratio. However, overall
Garuda Indonesia has created 2012 as their performing year where they have
managed to substantially increase sales as well as income.
Page 14
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
15/27
CHAPTER 4: APPENDICESA. Horizontal Analysis Calculation
B. Vertical Analysis Calculation
C. Ratio Analysis Calculation
Page 15
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
16/27
4A. HORIZONTAL ANALYSIS
Comparative Income Statement
Page 16
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
17/27
Comparative Balance Sheet
Page 17
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
18/27
Page 18
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
19/27
Page 19
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
20/27
4B. VERTICAL ANALYSIS
Comparative Income Statement
Page 20
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
21/27
Comparative Balance Sheet
Page 21
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
22/27
Page 22
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
23/27
Page 23
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
24/27
4C. RATIO ANALYSIS CALCULATION
Current Ratio
CR (2011) = Current Asset / Current Liabilities
= 422,061,515 / 570,334,808
= 0.74
CR (2012) = Current Asset / Current Liabilities
= 636,566,218 / 754,207,052
= 0.84
Ac id-Test Ratio
ATR (2011) = (Cash + Short-Term Investment + Current Receivable) / Current
Liabilities
= (2,766,623,874) / (570,334,808)
= 0.49
ATR (2012) = (Cash + Short-Term Investment + Current Receivable) / Current
Liabilities
= (463,133,653) / (754,207,052)
= 0.61
Account Receivable Turnover
ART (2011) = Net Sales / Average Account Receivable Net
= 3,096,328,405 / 141510635
= 2.188
Page 24
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
25/27
ART (2012) = Net Sales / Average Account Receivable Net
= 3,472,468,962 / 141,510,635
= 2.453
Days Sales Uncollected
DSU (2011) = Account Receivable Net / Net Sales
= (145672559 / 3096328405) x 365
= 0.04 x 365
= 17.172 days
DSU (2012) = Account Receivable Net / Net Sales
= (137,348,711 / 3,472,468,962) x 365
= 14.44 days
Total Asset Turnover
TAT (2011) = Net Sales / Average Total Asset
= 3,096,328,405 / 2,069,797,556
= 1.49
TAT (2012) = Net Sales / Average Total Asset
= 3,472,468,962 / 2,069,797,556
= 1.68
Debt-to-Equity Ratio
DTE (2011) = Total Liability / Total Equity
= 1,124,936,670 / 496,660,676
= 2.26
DTE (2012) = Total Liability / Total Equity
= 1,403,037,688 / 1,114,960,078
Page 25
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
26/27
= 1.25
Time Interest Earned
TIE (2011) = Income before Tax and Interest / Interest Expense
= 96,933,268 / 22,301,629
= 4.3
TIE (2012) = Income before Tax and Interest / Interest Expense
= 151,530,554 / 17,847,162
= 8.49
Net Profit Margin
NPM (2011) = Net Income / Net Sales
= 64,225,536 / 3,096,328,405
= 0.207
NPM (2012) = Net Income / Net Sales
= 110,842,573 / 3,472,468,962
= 0.319
Return on Total Asset
RTA (2011) = Net Income / Average Total Asset
= 64,225,536 / 2,069,797,556
= 0.031
RTA (2012) = Net Income / Average Total Asset
= 110,842,573 / 2,069,797,556
= 0.0535
Page 26
-
8/11/2019 Garuda Indonesia Financial Analysis
27/27
Price-Earning Ratio
PER (2011) = Market price per Common Share / Earning per Share
= 0.03 / 0.0029= 10.3
PER (2012) = Market price per Common Share / Earning per Share
= 0.04 / 0.0049
= 8.16