gastroparesis
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Abeezar I. SarelaConsultant in Upper GI & Bariatric Surgery
Hinduja Hospital, MumbaiSt James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
Gastric Motility Disorders
Case Study
• 52 year old woman
• Fullness after a small meal
• Continuous nausea
• 6-8 episodes of vomiting daily
• Upper abdominal bloating
• Diabetes– Insulin, Metformin, Exenatide
Endoscopy
Barium Meal and Follow-Through
CT scan
Functional Dyspepsia?
Gastroparesis
Delayed gastric emptying in
the absence of mechanical
obstruction of the stomach
True Prevalence?
25-40%
of “dyspeptic” patients
American Gastroenterological Association Technical Review on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 2004;127:1592-1622
Aetiology of Gastroparesis• Idiopathic
• Diabetes mellitus
• Post-surgical– Partial gastric resection/vagotomy– Bariatric surgery– Anti-reflux surgery
• Associated with other GI disorders
• Associated with Non-GI disordersAmerican Gastroenterological Association Technical Review on the Diagnosis and
Treatment of Gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 2004;127:1592-1622
Diabetic Gastroparesis
5-12% of diabetics
Long duration of disease ~ 10 years
Neuropathy, nephropathy, retinopathy
Diabetic Gastroparesis
• Destabilisation of blood glucose control
– Alteration in drug absorption
– Unpredictable delivery of food into intestine
• Hyperglycemia affects gastric motility
• Problems with blood glucose control may
be first indication of gastroparesis
Diagnosis
Nuclear Medicine
Gastric Scintigraphy
Normal Liquid Emptying from Stomach
ExponentialCurve ~Measure
T½
Normal Emptying of Solid Food from Stomach
Normal Emptying of Solid Food from Stomach
Linear Pattern ~ Measure ProportionRetained in Stomach
At 1 hours and 4 hours
Measuring Gastric Emptying
Dual Phase Scintigraphy
Scintigraphy uses different radionuclides for labeling the liquid
and solid elements of the meal so that emptying curves for both phases are
obtained simultaneously
Normal Gastric Emptying
Normal Pattern
• Liquid phase
– T½ less < 30 minutes
• Solid phase
– at least 25% of the meal leaves the stomach
by 60 minutes
– <15% is retained in the stomach at 4 hours
Gastroparesis
solid
liquid
liquid
solid
Gastroparesis
Gastric Emptying
N Eng J Med 2007;356:820-829
Other Tests
• 13C Labelled Octanoate Breath Test
• Antroduodenal Manometry
• Electrogastrography
• Ultrasound
• Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Why is Scintigraphy the Investigation of Choice?
• Simple
• Non-invasive
• Very small radio-active dose
• Physiological
• Prolonged observation
• Quantifiable
Severity of GastroparesisMild Moderate Severe
Retention at
4 hours
10-15% 16-35% >35%
Homogenised food Rare Sometime Routine
Nutritional supplements
Rare By mouth Jejunal tube
Non-pharmacologic
treatment
No No Yes
N Eng J Med 2007;356:820-829
Treatment of Gastroparesis
1. Correction of Exacerbating Factors
2. Nutrition
Homogenised Diet
Jejunal Tube Feeding
3. Symptomatic Treatment
• Macrolides– Erythromycin
• Dopamine Receptor Antagonists– Metoclorpromide
– Erythromycin
• Anti-emetics
• Analgesia
3. Symptomatic Treatment
• Botox injection at pylorus
• Surgery
• Gastric Electrical Stimulation
Gastric Smooth Muscle Function
• Gastric slow waves (Phasic): 3/min
– Bradygastria, Tachygastria, Gastric Dysrhythmia
• Tonic spikes superimposed on slow waves result in smooth muscle contraction
Soffer et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009;30:681-694
Gastric Electrical Stimulation (GES)
Gastric Pacing:• Entrain slow waves• Low-frequency + Long duration• Implantable Pulse Generator
(IPG) not available
Implantable GES• High frequency + Short duration• Slow waves not altered• Neural stimulation
Clinically Used GES is NOT pacing
Enterra™ Therapy (Medtronics) for Gastroparesis
• Humanitarian Device Exemption approval from the US FDA in 2000
• Handheld, external programmer to adjust the neurostimulator and customize therapy
• Therapy can be turned off at any time
Electrophysiology of Enterra™ Therapy
High-Frequency stimulation with
trains of
Short-Duration pulses
Soffer et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009;30:681-694
Enterra™: Position of Electrodes
9 cm
10 cm
1 cm
Implantation of Enterra™ Electrodes
Enterra™ Therapy
• ~ 1000 devices used world-wide
• Largest experience:
– University of Mississippi Medical Centre, Jackson, USA
– ~ 600 cases
• UK
– 8 regional centres
• Improvement in one of three parameters: 90%– Health Related Quality of Life Score
• Improved to 16.3 from 10.6
– Vomiting Frequency Score • Decreased to 1.9 [0.1] from 2.9 [0.1]
– Total GI Symptom Score • Decreased to 10.9 [0.2] from 15.6 [0.3]
• Gastric Emptying– Two-hour retention fell from 55% to 42%– Four-hour retention fell from 26% to 17%
Results of Enterra™ Therapy
214 patients. 1992-2005. Univ. of Miss Med Ctr. Anand et al. Digestion 2007;75:83-89
Predictors of Poor Outcome
• Predominant symptoms: pain and bloating
• Idiopathic gastroparesis
• Loss of interstitial cells of Cahal on full thickness gastric biopsy
• Electrogastrogram: tachygastric rhythm
Endoscopy-Placed, Trans-Nasal Electrodes:
Evaluation of Response to Temporary Therapy
Gastroparesis
• Commoner than we think
• Radio-labelled scintigraphy
• Optimise diabetes treatment
• Nutrition
• Symptom-control
• Enterra™
Controversies
• Quality of evidence: Weak– Only one RCT – poor– Variable scoring systems– Attrition bias
• Confounded by concurrent pharmacotherapy
• Relationship between delayed emptying and symptoms is unclear
• Mechanism of action is unclear