gb analyze and improve roadmap
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
1/26
Analyse Requirements
Module 2 deliverables
1
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
2/26
Main Effect
Affinity Diagram
2
Analyze
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
3/26
Organize the Causes
Method 1 Cause Relations
Analyze
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
4/26
Cause Relations
Main Header
RootCause
MainIssue 1
RootCause
RootCause
MainIssue 2
MainIssue 3
Main Issues (Primary causes) are with the most arrows going IN.A arrow is linked from the primary causes to the centre.
The root cause/s are those that have the most arrows going OUT
Analyze
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
5/26
Organize the Causes
Method 2 Fault Tree Analysis
Analyze
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
6/26
Minimum 3 levels of Causes.
First level is from Affinity diagram (Brainstorming)
For Causes with more than 3 levels,
start from the back to find the
Cause Failure - Effect
First: Brainstorm freely.
(Do not start with FTA)
Second: Affinity diagram
Third: Arrange First level causes in FTA
Analyze
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
7/26
Root Causes
The cause/s are developed further by doing aFault Tree Analysis (FTA).
Root Causes
Potential X
Analyze
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
8/26
Visualize the Causes
Method 1 Ishikawa Diagram
Analyze
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
9/26
Ishikawa Diagram
A useful tool for visualizing root causes is theIshikawa (fishbone) diagram.
There are a variety of ways to use it.
It is primarily a tool for organizing informationto establish and clarify the relationships
between an effect and its main causes.
CAUSES
Problem
StatementEFFECT
Analyze
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
10/26
Ishikawa Diagram
The Ishikawa diagram identifies the potential
root cause(s) of the problem so that collective
actions can be taken to eliminate their
recurrence.
It assists in reaching a common understanding
of the problem and exposes the potential
drivers of the problem.
Analyze
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
11/26
Ishikawa analysis
Primary
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
Header
The Ishikawa starts with taking the causes already listed.Each set of causes is linked and diagnosed to reach 5 levels
of analysis wherever possible. A primary cause alone is not acceptable
Analyze
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
12/26
Complete Ishikawa analysis
Potential XOR
Top Occurrence
Header1
1
1.1
1.1.1
Header2
Header3
Header
4
Header
5
Header
6
1.2
1.2.1
This is ROOTcause
Analyze
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
13/26
Select the Main Root Causes
Method 1
Constant, Noise, Experimental (CNX)
Analyze
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
14/26
Constant, Noise, Experiment
Causes CNX Details Possible SolutionHeader
Analyze
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
15/26
Show quick wins
Insert KaizenActivity (if any)
15
Analyze
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
16/26
Analyse Requirements
Module 3 deliverables
16
A l
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
17/26
Sample Data Collection
Based on each ME, sample data iscollected for each root cause.
For example:
ME 1 Discrete or Continuous
Root Causes Type of Data
RC 1 Continuous/Discrete
RC 2
17
Analyze
A l
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
18/26
Discrete
Continuous
Discrete Continuous
ME
RC
1. Pareto2. Test for proportions3. ANOVA4. Main Effects Plot
1. Test for proportions2. ANOVA3. Chi Sq (Categories
Only)
18
1. Test for Means2. Test for Variances3. Correlation4. Regression
1. Test for Means2. Test for Variances3. Correlation
4. Regression5. ANOVA
Analyze
A l
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
19/26
19
Confirm main root causes
Main Effect Main Root Causes
ME 1 RC 1
RC 2
RC 3
RC 4
RC 5
ME 2 etc RC 1 etc
Analyze
A l
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
20/26
20
I Invention
AAdd Value
M Maximize available resources
W Win Win
I Integrated
S
Savings
E Extensive
Possible innovative solutions criteria
The Search light for Creative and Innovative solutions
I - InventionThe solution derived through the process of thinking (PDCA/DMAIC) is new to theorganization. It is a first attempt by anyone or group. The idea may have beeninspired by developments and applications in technology outside the organization.It is an invention, when the team or circle modifies, customizes or improves onideas from external sources. The key concern is that the method, product orprocess is new to the organization.
A Add ValueThe solution eliminates or reduces physical strain and effort in creating a methodor product that impact on desired output. The new value is derived when physical,bodily movements and strain are replaced by knowledge-based work, relievesfatigue and physical concentration in obtaining the desired output.
M Maximize use of available resources
The technologies in use to produce the output and the resources available theorganization are used differently. More is obtained from the mix of resources thatgo into making the desired product or service.
WWin-Win results for the StakeholdersThe stakeholders benefit from the new solution. The customers, suppliers,public/community, organization and team/circle members obtain tangible andintangible benefits from the solution.
I IntegratedThe solution compliments and adds value to other processes, systems, andmethods in use in the organization. The solution positively reinforces thestandards of performance in other work processes and methods.
S SavingsThe solution saves time, money and resources. Peoples skills and performance isupgraded and the effort and energy is diverted to learning and continuousimprovement activities.
E ExtensiveThe application of the solution i s extended to other organizations, departments andwork places. The solution becomes a benchmark for others in the industry andenables the transfer of the new technology to other environments. Theorganization achieves the best practice ideals.
Analyze
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
21/26
A l
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
22/26
Project: MAIN EFFECT 1
Date:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Output Variables(Y's)
Invention Add ValueMaximizeAvailableResources
WIN-WIN Integrated Savings Extensive
Output Rating 1to 10
0.5 1.5 1 1 2 3 1
Input Variables(X's)
Association Table Rating %
ME 1 RC1SOLUTION A
0 0.00
ME 1 RC1SOLUTION B
0 0.00
ME 1 RC1
SOLUTION C
0 0.00
0 0.00
ME 1 RC2SOLUTION A
0 0.00
ME 1 RC2SOLUTION B
0 0.00
ME 1 RC2SOLUTION C
0 0.00
XY Matrix I AM WISE
22
Analyze
A l
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
23/26
Project: MAIN EFFECT 1
Date:
1 2 3 4 5
Output Variables (Y's) CCR 1 CCR 2 CCR 3 CCR 4 CCR 5
Output Rating 1 to 10 2 3 1 2 2
Input Variables (X's) Association Table Rating %
ME 1 RC1 SELECTEDSOLUTION
0 0.00
0 0.00
ME 1 RC2 SELECTEDSOLUTION
0 0.00
0 0.00
ME 1 RC3 SELECTEDSOLUTION
0 0.00
0 0.00
ME 1 RC4 SELECTEDSOLUTION
0 0.00
0 0.00
Validation of Selected Solutions
23
Analyze
Analyze
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
24/26
Force Field Analysis
24
Analyze
Analyze
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
25/26
PDPC
Process
PositiveDecision
Process
PositiveDecision
DecisionDecision Decision
Negative Negative
25
Analyze
Analyze
-
8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap
26/26
Solution Implementation plan
Gantt chart
26
Analyze