7/29/2019 gchgcgfc

1/2

TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES

Quezon CityARCHITECTURE / DRAFTING TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 9 (AR 511D4) THESIS GRADING SHEETARCHITECTURAL PROGRAMMING DEFENSE

THESIS PROPONENT/S : ____________________________________________________________________________PROJECT TITLE : ____________________________________________________________________________ADVISER : ____________________________________________________________________________

ITEMNO.

DESCRIPTION WEIGHT P LS S VS E GRADE

THE PROBLEM AND ITS SETTING 10

INTRODUCTION(Rationale of the Project, Background of the Project)

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

(Perceived Needs that the Study Intends to Address)PROJECT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES(The End Vision of the Proponent, List of Outputs)

5 1 2 3 4 5

SCOPE AND DELIMITATIONS

1

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PROJECT5 1 2 3 4 5

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 15

2REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND CASESTUDIES (Foreign and Local):

(Summary/Synopsis of the Literature/Similar ProjectStudied and Its Relevance to the Study)

15 1-3 4-7 8 9-12 13-15

SITE JUSTIFICATION 20SITE / DEVELOPMENT SELECTION CRITERIA

(General and Specific Criteria for Site/Development) 5 1 2 3 4 53 MACRO-MICRO SITE ANALYSIS

(CLUP and Zoning, Development restriction,Constraints, and Trends, Lot Plan, Capability andsuitability of the site, SWOT analysis, Site Zoning)

15 1-3 4-7 8 9-12 13-15

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 40SITE PLANNING AND SITE PROGRAMMING(Open space Ratio, Floor Area Ratio, PermeabilityRatio, Parking Ratio, Site Zoning, Density)

10 1-2 3-4 5 6-8 9-10

BUILDING SPACE PROGRAM(Organizational Chart, Space Analysis, User Analysis,Space adjacency Matrix, Bubble Diagrams, GFA, NFA,Floor Efficienc Ratio S ace Pro ram Matrix Massin

10 1-2 3-4 5 6-8 9-10

BUILDING LAWS(Conformity to pertinent laws e.g.PD1096, BP344, etc.)

10 1-2 3-4 5 6-8 9-10

4

DESIGN TRANSLATION(Theories Studied, Form Concept, Structural Concept,Material Concept, Site Concept, Building Plan Concept)

10 1-2 3-4 5 6-8 9-10

ARCHITECTURAL PRESENTATION 15PRESENTATION REQUIREMENTS(Completeness and Quality of Presentation Materials)

7 1 2-3 4 5-6 7

5 MASTERY AND DELIVERY(Thorough Knowledge of Project, Organization and

Analysis of Data, Manner of Presentation, Ability toDefend, English Proficiency)

8 1 2-3 4 5-6 7-8

LEGEND: TOTAL SCORE (TS)P Poor VS Very SatisfactoryLS Less Satisfactory E ExcellentS Satisfactory

RATING = TS / 2 + 50

PANELIST: _____________________________________ DATE: ______________________________________________

(Signature over printed name)

TIPQ ARCH 004Revision Status/Date: 1/2011 NOV 14

7/29/2019 gchgcgfc

2/2

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 9 (AR 511D4) THESIS COMMENT SHEET

Site and Project Justification Architectural Programming Defense

THESIS PROPONENT/S : ____________________________________________________________________________PROJECT TITLE : ____________________________________________________________________________ADVISER : ____________________________________________________________________________

QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, AND OTHER CONCERNS DURING PRESENTATIONINSTRUCTIONS TO THE PANELIST:Please be guided by the attached guide questions corresponding to the grading sheet criteria being evaluated.Kindly list down all additional questions, comments and other concerns that may strike you during the presentation, also inaccordance to the criteria being evaluated, to be used as a guide during the panel discussion.Place a check mark on all questions successfully answered by the proponent/s.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

FINAL COMMENTS AND OTHER CONCERNSINSTRUCTIONS TO THE PANELIST:Kindly list down all comments and other concerns that may arise during deliberations as well as any other questions notanswered successfully by the proponent/s during the panel discussion.This shall serve as the justification / basis of the grade given to the proponent/s for this particular defense.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

PANELIST: _______________________________________ DATE: ____________________________________________(Signature over printed name)

TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINESQuezon City

ARCHITECTURE / DRAFTING TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT

AVE. RATING

TIPQ ARCH 016Revision Status/Date: 1/2011 NOV 14