gender, race and ethnicity, and entrepreneurship
DESCRIPTION
Experiences in Mecklenburg CountyTRANSCRIPT
Wom
en +
Girl
s Res
earc
h Al
lianc
e
Gender, Race and Ethnicity, and Entrepreneurship:
Experiences in Mecklenburg County
Gender, Race and Ethnicity, and Entrepreneurship: Experiences in Mecklenburg County
Prepared by:
Qingfang Wang, Ph.D.
Claire Schuch
Elizabeth Morrell
Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, UNC Charlotte
Final Report prepared for Women + Girls Research Alliance
Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2
II. Current State of Knowledge on Female Entrepreneurship and Study Hypotheses .............................................................. 3
III. Research Design ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
IV. Findings and Discussions ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6
1. Overview: Business Ownership in Mecklenburg County ............................................................................................................... 6
(1) Rate of Business Ownership ................................................................................................................................................................... 6
(2) Characteristics of Business Owners ................................................................................................................................................... 6
(3) Industrial Sectors ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 10
2. Characteristics Associated with Business Ownership .................................................................................................................. 12
3. Job Earnings of Business Owners ............................................................................................................................................................. 15
4. Experiences of Female Business Owners ............................................................................................................................................. 17
(1) Motivation and Goals for Women Business Owners ............................................................................................................. 17
(2) Between Work and Family: Joy, Responsibility, and Sometimes Struggle...................................................................... 19
(2.1) Balancing With Family Responsibilities ................................................................................................................................... 19
(2.2) Not All About “Balancing” ................................................................................................................................................................. 18
(3) Perception of Women Business Owners ............................................................................................................................................ 20
(3.1) Disadvantages ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 20
(3.2) Role of Culture ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
(3.3) Advantages and Gender Capital .................................................................................................................................................... 21
(4) Social Networking and Social Capital .................................................................................................................................................. 21
(5) My Community ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 21
(6) Charlotte’s Business Environment ........................................................................................................................................................ 22
V. Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................................ 21
Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22
References ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 31
Executive Summary
When other conditions are held the same, women, particularly U.S.-born, are much less likely to own a business.
The rate of business ownership is significantly higher for the foreign-born than for the U.S.-born labor force.
U.S.-born blacks and women in particular have the lowest rate of business ownership overall.
Ethnic and racial minority groups tend to concentrate in a limited number of industrial sectors. Across all racial
and ethnic groups, women-owned businesses are more likely to be concentrated in retail-related, supportive,
and personal service-oriented sectors than businesses owned by men. Most notably, foreign-born Hispanic are
concentrated in professional and management industries more than their co-ethnic male counterparts and
when compared with other racial and ethnic minority groups.
For most of the women interviewed, they started their businesses based on their “entrepreneurial
personalities” ability to leverage experience from former work. They sought better pay, a balance between work
and family, or an escape from a corporate environment. They wanted more freedom and flexibility.
Women business owners tend to be more holistic in measuring their success and goals. Women measure their
success in dollars but also based on the business’ compatibility with their values, vision, greater purpose in life,
ability to contribute to the community, and flexibility to balance work and family. These values are well-
incorporated into their leadership styles and businesses operation strategies.
Work-life or work-family balance is on the forefront of women entrepreneurs’ experiences. For some of them,
balancing between home and work has been a struggle due to long working hours compounded by familial
responsibilities. For others, owning a business makes the task of “balance” easier, allowing them to have more
flexibility than working for someone else. Most women make an intentional effort to have this balance to avoid
being completely swallowed by their careers.
Many, but not all of our participants, shared discriminatory experiences and, as result, have the perception that
they are somewhat disadvantaged compared with other business owners due to their status as female business
owners and business owners of color. At the same time, culture in the country of origin plays a role for many
immigrant women business owners in terms of how they view gender in family and at work. On the other hand,
some women adamantly insisted that no difference exists between male and female entrepreneurs. In some
cases, being a female business owner is even considered an asset.
The women entrepreneurs have used social networks extensively for hiring employees and subcontractors,
finding clients, and forming partnerships with other businesses. Professional business organizations play a
significant role in such development and networking. Ethnicity and kinship are very important, especially for
Hispanics and Asians. In particular, family members, spouses, and extended family members often work for the
woman’s business as employees or subcontractors. However, not all women entrepreneurs have access to these
networks. Many of them said they such networks have nothing to offer, especially for women with very small
budgets, those few or no personnel, and those who have to physically be at work for long hours.
An overwhelming majority of participants stated that philanthropy and giving back to communities is one of
their biggest goals in running their businesses. This goal is especially true in Charlotte, because the business
climate here is perceived to emphasize the interconnectedness of community and business. Involvement with
2
the community is commonly regarded as a fundamental component of a successful business plan. Women
entrepreneurs’ community involvement takes many different forms and may be tied with their faith, ethnicity
or nationality, particularly for foreign-born and ethnic minority women business owners. Many women business
owners perceive Charlotte to be an entrepreneurial, pro-business community with plentiful opportunities for
networking. However, others reported that Charlotte is a “clique-ish” city and that, to be successful, a business owner
has to “play the game.” In particular, ethnic minority women, particularly African Americans, often expressed their
frustration in accessing the opportunities and networks Charlotte offers. A significant number of Hispanic and Asian
business owners also expressed that they lacked support in starting their businesses.
I. Introduction
The number of women-owned businesses has increased dramatically in the United States during the past
decade. Studies have shown that owning a business can provide women with a springboard for economic
progress and further socioeconomic advancement. Self-employment also can be an avenue for the
empowerment of some ethnic minority women to break free from traditional gender roles (Hanson 2009;
Levent et al. 2009; Mayer 2008; Orser & Dyke 2009). However, significant differences exist between female-
owned and male-owned enterprises; between female and male entrepreneurs; and between white, native-born
entrepreneurs and entrepreneurs of color (Kariv 2011; Kepler & Shane 2007; Wang 2009). With the continuing
influx of immigrants from Latin America and Asia during the past several decades, the labor force in the United
States is becoming increasingly racially and ethnically diverse. Many places in North America that have received
large numbers of immigrants have become fertile land for ethnic entrepreneurship (Kaplan & Li 2006).
Given this background, the purpose of this study is to investigate the experiences of a diverse group of female
business owners in Mecklenburg County, NC. In North Carolina, small businesses (defined as having fewer than
500 employees) represent 98 percent of all employers and employ 47.3 percent of the private sector workforce
(Small Business Administration 2012). Despite the weak economy that accompanied the 2007–2008 recession,
small businesses in North Carolina represented 81.6 percent of net new private-sector jobs from 2005 to 2008.
In Mecklenburg County, women-owned, ethnic minority-owned, and immigrant-owned business have all grown
significantly and, as such, are becoming an integral part of Charlotte’s economic engine for regional
development.
This growth of women- and ethnic minority owned-businesses is situated within a metropolitan area that has
changed dramatically in size and demographics during the past decade. Between 1990 and 2010, the number of
immigrants in the Charlotte metropolitan area has increased from less than 25,000 to almost 170,000, a 630
percent increase. Most of the growth in this metropolitan area happened in Mecklenburg County. In year 1990,
the foreign-born population in Mecklenburg County was less than 18,000. By 2010, the number already
increased to 120,000, with a growth rate of 568 percent. Indeed, Charlotte has been labeled as both a “pre-
emerging immigrant gateway” and as a “hypergrowth” Latino immigration destination (Singer 2004; Suro &
Singer 2002).
The arrival of a large foreign-born population has not only socially and economically transformed the historic
reality of Charlotte as quintessentially southern and biracial but also has challenged contemporary
understanding of racial and ethnic socioeconomic integration and inequalities (Smith & Furuseth 2006).
3
Therefore, the Charlotte region provides a natural laboratory to investigate how gender, race and ethnicity, and
immigration status interact with each other in entrepreneurial processes.
This study integrates quantitative analyses of the most recent data from the American Community Survey
(2007–2011) with in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with business owners, local and regional
supporting agencies (e.g., city government, women’s and ethnic associations, companies), and informal field
observations. The study specifically addresses the following questions:
How do rates and type of business ownership differ by gender, ethnicity, and immigrant status
in Mecklenburg County?
What are the experiences of women business owners in starting their businesses and in
conducting their daily operations?
To what extent and in what manner are women business owners connected to local
communities?
By drawing a broad picture of entrepreneurship along the lines of race, ethnicity, and gender in our region, this
study provides insights to help researchers and policymakers further understand women and ethnic minority
entrepreneurs’ levels of access to business development resources and the barriers they may encounter in
trying to access such resources. The study has profound and timely public policy implications. It contributes to
an improved understanding of the opportunities and challenges facing women and members of the ethnic
minority labor force as they use entrepreneurship as a vehicle to work toward economic integration and
upward mobility in the labor market. In light of the national push for economic recovery, this study also
promotes public understanding of female, ethnic minority, and immigrant entrepreneurship and will help to
build institutional infrastructure for the healthy development of such businesses in our region.
II. Current State of Knowledge on Female Entrepreneurship and Study Hypotheses
A considerable amount of literature has reported that women frequently work in different types of jobs from
men, often highly concentrated in semi- or low-skilled, unstable sectors with poor working conditions and low
pay (Carlson 1997; Reskin 1993). Similarly, studies have determined that women-owned enterprises tend to be
smaller in size, report net lower profits, and are less likely to survive and expand (Cliff 1998; Wang 2013) when
compared with their male counterparts. Empirical studies argue that the gendered labor market outcomes
could result from the differences between male and female entrepreneurs in educational backgrounds,
motivations, goals, strategies, management styles, and personal values (Levent et al. 2009). Such outcomes also
can be attributed to women’s constraints of family and gender roles, the lack of previous business experience,
difficulty in obtaining financial support, and limited social networks (Bergen & Williams 1992; Blake & Hanson
2005; Hanson 2009). In particular, previous works have argued that women’s localized job search networks
reinforce the segregated nature of their job prospects (England 1993; Wang 2010). Studies on women
entrepreneurs and women-owned enterprises have shown that women’s social networks are “smaller, more
personal, and more locally based” (Hanson & Blake 2009; Mayer 2008), and female entrepreneurs are more
likely to participate in local networks through their daily lives (Loscocco et al. 2009).
4
Although female entrepreneurship of any type is an understudied phenomenon, the experiences of ethnic
minority women entrepreneurs are even less known (Light 2007; Schrover et al. 2007), and little is known
about the extent to which their status as immigrant women of color serves them as an asset or works as a
barrier to entrepreneurship. On the one hand, these women may be perceived as “triple disadvantaged” (race,
gender, and citizenship status) and therefore as facing greater hardships in the labor market when compared
with entrepreneurs from majority groups (Raijman & Semyonov 1997). Thus, ethnic minority women may be
pushed into business ownership for an alternative employment avenue.
On the other hand, some have suggested that ethnic resources such as ethnic networks may function as assets
rather than barriers in helping them to start and grow their businesses (Moya 2007). For instance, a number of
studies have argued that geographic areas with high concentrations of particular ethnicities offer unique
resources to prospective co-ethnic entrepreneurs, including information on market opportunities, a ready
source of ethnic labor, access to credit, knowledge of consumer preferences, consumer markets for such
businesses that cater to specialized ethnic tastes, and common religious affiliations (Wilson & Portes 1980; Zhou
1992; Waldinger et al. 1990; Wang 2013). Therefore, belonging to an ethnic or racial group and living in and
operating a business in an area dominated by this group may provide women with resources needed to start a
business and, in that sense, function as an asset for entrepreneurship. An example is the case of Iranian women
entrepreneurs in Los Angeles (Dallafar 1994), who used their social networks both domestically and
transnationally to both start their businesses and to recruit new clients.
Based on these existing studies, the current study hypothesizes:
1. Men and women have distinctive experiences in business ownership. These differentiated experiences are
based on factors such as their type of businesses, business earnings, personal and household characteristics,
motivations, operational strategies, interactions with community (both positive and negative) and measures of
success.
2. Rates of business ownership among ethnic minority and immigrant women are higher than white women due
to both possible blocked opportunities in the open wage labor markets and ethnic resources that lead to
business ownership.
3. Ethnic minority and immigrant female business owners differ from white female business owners in their
overall characteristics. This can be attributed in particular to the number of years they have lived in the United
States, their English proficiency, existing co-ethnic or co-nationality communities, local socioeconomic and
institutional infrastructure, and other immigrant related-factors.
4. The relationship between women entrepreneurs and their local communities is a two-way, dialectical
relationship. Women’s business activities are closely related to their involvement with local communities, and
they contribute to neighborhood and community building in the ways that could go beyond economic gains and
job creation.
III. Research Design
The first set of data is extracted from the microdata sample of the American Community Survey (ACS) 2007–
2011 for the study area. Using descriptive analyses and multivariate regression, this part of the study compares
5
rates of business ownership, business incorporation, business earnings, and personal and household
characteristics associated with business ownership between men and women, between native- and foreign-
born persons, and between different ethnic groups. In particular, marital status and household structure (e.g.,
presence of young children and family size) are examined. For immigrants, years in the United States and
English proficiency are particularly relevant.
To examine the experiences of female business owners as they engage in the day-to-day tasks associated with
business ownership, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with female business owners were
conducted. From fall 2011 to spring 2012 (referred to hereafter as “Phase I”), in collaboration with the Charlotte
Chamber of Commerce and Pride Magazine, the principal investigator conducted two focus group discussions
with both male and female African American business owners and one focus group discussion with local
supporting agencies and organizations, including participants from city government, ethnic associations, and
companies located in the Charlotte region that subcontract to smaller businesses. Insights from these focus
group discussions significantly informed the research questions, findings, and conclusions from the current
study that was conducted between May and September 2013 (referred to hereafter as “Phase II”).
During Phase I, a research team at UNC Charlotte constructed a database on women- and ethnic-minority-
owned businesses. The initial database began as a product of several different lists acquired from Pride
Magazine, Business Wise, and Dun & Bradstreet’s databases through the patronage of the Charlotte Chamber of
Commerce. To ensure accurate data, website and telephone screening were conducted to corroborate
information in the databases. Although the final database does not include every minority-owned business in
the area, mainly due to nonresponse, it is the best available dataset for our research purposes in our region.
From this database, a structured random sampling strategy based on business type and employment size was
employed to recruit women business owners via telephone. Due to the lower response rate of Hispanic and
particularly Asian women business owners, we also visited local events to recruit participants, including
meetings organized by the Charlotte chapter of the National Association of Women Business Owners (NAWBO)
and the Multicultural Business forum, in addition to contacting local ethnic associations for recruitment. A total
of 40 women business owners (10 from each group of white, black, Hispanic, and Asian) participated in the
project. Among them, 32 participated in one-on-one in-depth interviews, and 8 participated in two focus group
discussions.
In-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted in English. For all the participants, we asked
the same set of open-ended questions that permitted a high degree of flexibility and allowed informants to move
their narratives to topics outside the immediate scope of the guide, while still maintaining methodological rigor
because the same basic topics were addressed with each participant. This approach offered rich opportunities
for expanding content around the research themes. The questions asked were focused on the following major
themes: (1) motivations, business strategies, and goals, (2) achievements and performances, (3) connections
with co-ethnic community and local neighborhoods, and (4) challenges and opportunities. Interviews lasted for
30 to 120 minutes, and focus group discussions lasted for 60 to 80 minutes. To analyze the qualitative data, we
employed the techniques of narrative analysis outlined by Strauss & Corbin (1998) and Smith (2000) to code
each interview discussion along the themes such as motivation, work-life balance, social capital, race, ethnicity,
and involvement with communities. The qualitative software package QSR NVivo was used to code data against
key themes. Results from both qualitative and qualitative analyses were triangulated to determine
commonalities in narrative as well as differences in perspective and opinion (Saldana 2009).
6
IV. Findings and Discussions
1. Overview: Business Ownership in Mecklenburg County
(1) Rate of Business Ownership
According to the most recent estimation (Small Business Administration 2012), in Mecklenburg County, 27,456
women-owned firms exist (regardless of ethnicity). They employ 28,959 employees and net a total of $4.4
billion sales (2007). Among them, 3,020 (11.0 percent) have paid employees with total sales of $3.7 billion and a
total annual payroll of $934 million. Regardless of gender, there are 13,873 African American-owned, 4,242
Hispanic-owned, and 4,054 Asian-owned firms in our county. Among them, 701 (5.1 percent) African American-
owned firms, 379 (8.9 percent) Hispanic-owned firms and 1,195 (29.5 percent) Asian-owned firms have paid
employees. Because no public data provide further information on the gendered division of businesses, we used
the five-year 2006–2011 American Community Survey (ACS)1 data for further information. For a comparative
perspective, we include information for the total labor force, U.S.-born white, U.S.-born black, foreign-born
Hispanic, and foreign-born Asian groups, separated by men and women whenever possible and relevant to our
discussion. U.S.-born Hispanic and Asian groups and foreign-born white and black groups are omitted from the
current study due to their small sizes.
Of the total 509,229 individuals in the labor force in Mecklenburg County, 82 percent are U.S. born and 13
percent are foreign born. As shown in Figure 1, among the 420,101 members of the U.S.-born labor force, Non-
Hispanic whites comprise 62 percent, blacks 33 percent, and others 5 percent. Among the 89,128 members of
the foreign-born labor force, Hispanics comprise 48 percent, Asians 23 percent and others 29 percent.
Figure 1. Ethnic Composition of Labor Force in Mecklenburg County
The rate of business ownership among the total labor force in Mecklenburg County is 9.2 percent, ranging from
4.2 percent for U.S.-born blacks to 11.4 percent for U.S.-born whites. The business ownership rate for the total
foreign-born population is around 11 percent, with 9.8 percent for Asian and 8.6 percent for Hispanic persons.
Generally speaking, the rate of business ownership is lower for women among all groups except for Hispanic
1 The ACS asks whether the respondent is “self-employed or not”; if “yes,” whether the businesses is “incorporated or not.” In this study, self-employed members of the labor force who indicated that their businesses were either incorporated or nonincorporated were included as a proxy for the total number of business owners. However, a caution must be made. The self-employment variable in the U.S. Census (ACS) data is likely picking up a truncated distribution of the truly self-employed with no or very few employees because those people whose businesses are incorporated may not be likely to identify themselves on the census long form as self-employed (Bregger 1996; also see Wang 2009 for a more detailed discussion).
White 62%
Black 33%
Others 5% Native Born
Hispanic 48%
Asian 23%
Others 29%
Foreign-Born
7
persons (Figure 2). Foreign-born Hispanic women have a higher rate than men. This pattern is consistent with
the national average profile (Wang 2014).
Figure 2: Rate of Business Ownership in Mecklenburg County by Gender and Ethnicity
Data Source: American Community Survey 2006–2011
Figure 3 (below) provides the rate of business ownership for the five largest immigrant groups by country of
birth, separated by gender. Although the difference between men and women is minimal among Mexican,
Indian, and Honduran groups, males in the labor force have significantly higher rates of business ownership for
El Salvadoran and Vietnamese groups.
Figure 3. Rate of Business Ownership for the Five Largest Immigrant Groups
Data Source: American Community Survey 2006–2011
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Total US-White US-Black Foreign ForeignHispanic
ForeignAsian
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Male
Female
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
Mexico India El Salvador Honduras Vietnam
Male
Female
8
(2) Characteristics of Business Owners
Compared with the entire labor force, business owners tend to be older, which makes sense because starting
and operating a business could require more work experience. Generally speaking, male business owners are
older than female business owners, except for foreign-born business owners as a whole. Among the foreign-
born, although Asian male business owners are older than their female co-ethnic counterparts, Hispanic female
business owners are older than the male business owners.
In terms of business owners’ levels of education, the percentage holding a bachelor’s degree or higher is about
45.6 percent and 46.5 percent for men and women, respectively, among business owners as a whole. The
percentage is much higher for U.S.-born white groups (around 53.4 percent for men and 56.9 percent for
women) than minority groups. Although for the entire foreign-born labor force, the percentage of bachelor’s
degree (or above) holders is lower for women (30.7 percent) than for men (38.1 percent), women have higher
level of educational attainment than men for the entire labor force in Mecklenburg County, and for native whites
and blacks, and for foreign-born Hispanics and Asians. Specifically, for U.S.-born blacks, the percentage of female
business owners holding a bachelor’s degree or above is much higher than their co-ethnic male counterparts
(27.5 percent, compared with 19.6 percent). For foreign-born Hispanic business owners, the percentage is 26.2
percent for female business owners and 16.6 percent for their male counterparts. For Asian business owners,
the percentage is 47 percent for women and 44.5 percent for men. Overall, in Mecklenburg County, educational
attainment of business owners is higher for women than for men, as women of all minority groups outrank men
in their educational achievements.
In contrast to their level of education, however, the earned income from work is much lower for women
business owners of all ethnic groups than for men. In addition, the rate of business incorporation is much lower
for women. These patterns indicate that employment size for women business owners could be smaller than
male-owned businesses. Among the racial and ethnic groups, U.S.-born white business owners, both men and
women, have higher earned incomes than the county average. U.S.-born black and foreign-born Hispanic male
business owners earn less than half of what the average U.S.-born white male entrepreneur earns. Likewise,
foreign-born Hispanic and U.S.-born black women earn much less than U.S.-born white women business
owners. However, the difference between ethnic groups is smaller for women than it is for men. Figure 4
provides the overall picture.
9
Figure 4. Job Earned Income for Male and Female Business Own ers
Data Source: American Community Survey 2006–2011
A much higher proportion of female business owners work less than 40 hours a week (referred to as “part-time”
hereafter) than male business owners, with the exception of U.S.-born blacks. Specifically, the percentage of
part-time business owners is 51.7 for females and 27.3 for females for the labor force as a whole, 55.4 for
females and 26.4 for males among U.S.-born whites, 44.4 for females and 42.2 for males among U.S.-born blacks,
and 49.5 for females and 20.1 for males among foreign born. For foreign-born Hispanics, the percentage of part-
time business owners is 46.2 for females and 27.2 for males. For foreign-born Asians, the percentages are 42 for
females and only 5.9 for males. Participating in part-time jobs could partially explain the significant earned
income disparities between men and women.
More than 75 percent of foreign-born business owners speak English well, or very well, or only speak English
(which is defined as “English proficiency”). The percentage of English proficiency is comparatively lower for
foreign-born Hispanics (around 60 percent) and higher for foreign-born Asians (above 90 percent). About 70
percent of foreign-born business owners have been in the United States for 10 years or longer; however, the
length of stay in the United States is slightly shorter for females. About 60.3 percent of male and 42.9 percent of
female foreign-born Asian business owners have been in the United States for more than 20 years, compared
with less than 30 percent of both male and female foreign-born Hispanic business owners in the same cohorts.
This fact likely reflects Charlotte’s identity as a new “pre-emerging” destination for Latino immigration (Singer
2004). About 66.9 percent of male and 65.5 percent of female Hispanic business owners have lived in the United
States for 5 to 20 years, compared with 36.3 percent of male and 39.5 percent of female Asian business owners
in the same cohorts.
For household characteristics, male business owners are more likely to be married than their female
counterparts, across all ethnic and racial groups. Despite this fact, except for Asian groups, female business
owners tend to have larger families than male business owners. Even more interestingly, female business
owners have a much higher probability of having a spouse who is also a business owner. This suggests that
female business owners are more likely to co-own a business with their spouse than male business owners. The
difference in the percentage of having a spouse who is also a business owner between men and women varies
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
Total US-white US-black Foreign foreignHispanic
foreignAsian
Men
Women
10
significantly across all the groups. As shown in Figure 5, the percentage is lowest for U.S.-born blacks and
highest for foreign born Asian business owners. Although the data do not reveal whether the couple co-owns
the same businesses; when a business owner has a spouse who is also a business owner, we can expect co-
ownership could be the case. If so, the co-ownership between spouses is the most likely among Asians.
Figure 5: Percentage of Business Owners with Business Owner Spouse
Data Source: American Community Survey 2006–2011
(3) Industrial Sectors
Table 1 provides the industrial distribution of businesses in Mecklenburg County. More than one-quarter of all
business owners, both men and women, work in retail trade. The foreign-born owners comprise a higher
percentage of business owners in this sector than the native-born owners. For instance, nearly half (48.4
percent) of foreign-born Asian males work in retail trade. Another 20 percent of all business owners work in
professional and management industries. However, foreign-born Asians are underrepresented in this sector
(5.2 percent for male and 3.1 percent for female). Asian business owners are instead more concentrated in the
sectors of art, entertainment, recreation, and food services (11.7 percent for Asian men and 9.5 percent for
Asian women). Although these percentages are much higher than the county average, the U.S.-born have a much
lower presence in these sectors, particularly for U.S.-born black-owned businesses (6.3 percent for men and 1.1
percent for women).
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Total US-white US-black Foreign foreignHispanic
foreignAsian
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Men
Women
11
Table 1. Industrial Distribution of Business Owners (%)
Industry Sector
Total Native White
Native Black
Foreign Hispanic
Foreign Asian
M F M F M F M F M F
Agriculture Mining 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0
Construction 18.
2 2.4 16.3 3.8 15.6 0.0 45.3 0.0 4.3 1.9
Manufacturing 3.2 3.7 3.8 3.0 0.8 1.3 1.7 4.9 4.7 16.1
Wholesale Trade 3.1 1.6 4.2 1.7 0.5 2.4 1.8 0.0 0.0 4.6
Retail Trade 25.
3 28.2 22.7 25.7 24.2 21.9 30.3 37.6 48.4 38.5
Utilities and Transportation and Warehousing 4.6 1.1 2.8 0.9 10.4 2.3 5.8 0.0 4.2 0.0
Information and Communications 1.4 0.8 2.0 1.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 9.4 9.0 12.0 10.9 8.6 10.2 1.1 2.1 4.7 2.2
Professional 19.
0 19.6 22.5 21.8 12.7 14.7 7.1 23.6 5.2 3.0
Education, Health, and Social Services 3.4 13.4 4.1 13.1 3.0 23.1 1.3 1.6 3.7 11.9
Art Entertainment Recreation 5.5 6.6 4.0 7.0 6.3 1.0 1.9 10.0 11.7 9.5
Other Services 6.6 13.1 5.2 10.0 17.5 23.0 3.7 20.2 11.6 12.3
Data Source: American Community Survey 2006–2011
There are significant differences in the types of businesses most commonly owned by men and women across
ethnic and racial groups. For example, 18.2 percent of men work in construction, but only 2.4 percent of women
do. On the other hand, about 13 percent of women work in the educational, health, and social services industry;
another 13 percent women work in personal services. Male business owners have a much lower presence in
these two sectors (only 3.4 percent and 6.6 percent, respectively). These gender differences are consistent with
national trends and patterns observed from previous studies. Regarding the construction industry, however,
some significant differences occur in ownership patterns across racial and ethnic groups. Compared with U.S.-
born white and black male businesses, foreign-born persons, particularly Hispanic men, represent a much
higher percentage of business owners in the construction industry—25.5 percent for all foreign-born men and
45.4 percent of foreign-born Hispanic men, compared with only 16.3 percent for U.S.-born white men, 15.6
percent for U.S.-born black men, and 4.3 percent for foreign-born Asian men.
U.S.-born, especially white, business owners represent a large portion of those working in finance, insurance,
and real estate, regardless of their gender. In contrast, the foreign-born are underrepresented in this sector,
although foreign-born Asian males have a higher rate of business ownership in this sector than do other foreign-
born groups. In the professional and management sectors, both U.S.-born white men and women have a rate
higher of business ownership than the county average (around 20 percent) and the ownership rate of most
ethnic minority groups. The rate of ownership in this sector for U.S.-born blacks is only 12.7 percent and 14.7
percent for men and women, respectively. For the foreign-born, women (18.3 percent) have a much higher rate
12
than men (10 percent) in this sector. This higher presence of female business owners in this sector is
attributable to the fact that 23.6 percent of foreign-born Hispanic women business owners are in this sector,2
compared with only 7.1 percent of Hispanic male business owners. Only 5.2 percent of men and 3.0 percent of
women work in this sector among the foreign-born Asian entrepreneurs.
U.S.-born black women are highly concentrated in education, health, and social services (23.1 percent) and
personal services (23 percent), in addition to retail trade, as discussed earlier. In fact, U.S.-born blacks, both men
and women, are heavily concentrated in personal services when compared with other racial and ethnic groups.
For example, compared with 17.5 percent of U.S.-born black male business owners in the personal services
sector, only 5.2 percent of U.S.-born white male business owners, 3.7 percent of foreign-born Hispanic male
business owners, and 11.7 percent of foreign-born Asian male business owners work in this sector. Compared
with 23.0 percent of U.S.-born black female business owners in the personal services sectors, the percentage for
U.S.-born white female business owners in these sectors is only 10 percent and 12.3 percent for Asian female
business owners. Foreign-born Hispanic women, however, are also highly concentrated in personal services (20
percent) in addition to retail trade (37.6 percent) and professional and management industries (23.6 percent).
Although retail (38.5 percent); educational, health, and social services (11.2 percent); and personal services
(12.3 percent) are important sectors for Asian women business owners, 16.1 percent of them work in
manufacturing. This rate is much higher than the county average (3 to 4 percent).3
Overall, the statistics about entrepreneurship by type of business indicate that ethnic and racial minority groups tend to
concentrate in a limited number of industrial sectors and that women-owned businesses are more likely to be
concentrated in retail-related, supportive, and personal services-oriented sectors than men, across all racial and ethnic
groups. These patterns are consistent with findings observed at the national level (Wang 2013). Despite this broad
pattern, some intergroup variation exists. Most notably, foreign-born Hispanic women are much more concentrated in
professional and management industries than not only their co-ethnic male counterparts but also women and men of
other racial or ethnic minority groups. Foreign-born Asian businesses are highly concentrated in retail and personal
services-oriented industries; Asian men do not demonstrate a higher profile than their co-ethnic women business
owners in terms of skill-level.4
2. Characteristics Associated with Business Ownership
In order to quantify the association between personal and household characteristics and the probability of
individual business ownership, logistic regression was conducted for the civilian employed labor force. The
dependent variable represents the probability of a member of the labor force owning a business. The dependent
variables and the final results are displayed in Table 2. This model suggests that, generally, older age, larger
family size, being male, having a spouse who is also self-employed, working shorter hours, and being foreign-
2 Further investigation indicates that these sectors include: “Legal services,” “Veterinary services,” and “Services to buildings and dwellings, except construction cleaning.” The last sector suggests a connection with Hispanic male-owned businesses in construction, although Hispanic women have zero presence in the dataset. 3 Further investigation indicates that these sectors include: “Seafood and other miscellaneous foods,” “Apparel accessories and other apparel manufacturing,” “Plastics product manufacturing,” “Miscellaneous fabricated metal products manufacturing,” and “Medical equipment and supplies manufacturing.” 4 The principal investigator also has examined business participation in the high-tech industries. Due to the small number of business owners represented in these industries, the results are not presented here. However, findings suggest that foreign-born Asian women business owners are much more likely to be involved in high-tech industries (mainly in medical equipment and supplies, and medical and diagnostic laboratories) than Asian male business owners as well as business owners from all other female groups.
13
born are significantly and positively associated with likelihood of individual business ownership. For example,
the chance that a member of the labor force owns a business increases by four times if the individual has a
spouse who also owns a business. However, because the U.S.-born labor force dominates the entire data sample
(as discussed in Section 4.1.1), the above pattern likely reflects characteristics of U.S.-born whites and blacks.
When other conditions are held the same, women, particularly those born in the United States, are much less
likely to own a business than men. Specifically, compared with U.S.-born white men, the likelihood of business
ownership is reduced by 60 percent for U.S.-born women. The likelihood of business ownership is reduced by
46 percent for U.S.-born black women, compared with their co-ethnic male counterparts. However, having a
bachelor’s degree significantly increases the probability of business ownership for U.S.-born white women.
Table 2: Characteristics Associated with Business Ownership
Variable Total U.S. White U.S. Black Foreign Foreign Hispanic
Foreign Asian
Age 1.602*** 1.788*** 0.980*** 1.259*** 0.914* 1.097*
Bachelor’s degree -0.089 -0.044 -0.458 -0.285 0.27 -0.914**
Married -0.124 -0.164* 0.33 -0.357* -0.528* -0.131
Family size 0.063** 0.086** -0.064 0.086* 0.055 0.246***
Female -0.835*** -0.941*** -0.610*** -0.396* -0.14 -0.393
Spouse 1.378*** 1.272*** 1.050* 1.938*** 2.360*** 2.144***
Female * Spouse 0.155 0.152 0.245 0.105 -0.124 0.034
Female * degree 0.222* 0.295* 0.463 0.044 -0.078 0.679
Work hours -0.009*** -0.014*** -0.014* 0.016** -0.016 0.037***
Foreign-born 0.399***
Female*foreign-born 0.277*
Black -0.789*** -0.535*
Hispanic -0.475*** -0.465**
Asian -0.418** -0.376*
Mixed race -0.187 0.366
English 0.234 0.263 1.022*
Years in the U.S. 0.005 0.012 0.022
_cons -7.559*** -8.067*** -5.761*** -7.195*** -5.295** -9.495***
N 19675 11874 4231 2885 1130 741 Dependent Variable: (log) odds of owning a business; legend: * p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001 Data Source: American Community Survey 2007–2011
When other conditions are held the same, the odds of business ownership increase 50 percent for foreign-born
persons, compared with U.S.-born persons. For women in particular, foreign-born status significantly increases
the probability of business ownership. As discussed earlier, cultural heritage, social networking, and possible
limited job opportunities in the wage labor market may all work as both pull and push factors that have
increased business ownership among foreign-born persons. In fact, the results for all foreign-born business
owners indicate that, although foreign-born women are less likely to own businesses than foreign-born men, the
difference between foreign-born men and women is smaller than that between U.S.-born men and women. For
14
foreign-born Hispanics and foreign-born Asians, the difference between genders is not significant at all, perhaps
demonstrating the significance of entrepreneurship as a source of income for foreign-born women.
In the comparison of foreign-born and U.S.-born groups, several patterns emerge. The positive effect from
having a spouse who also owns a business is much stronger for the foreign-born groups than for the native
born. For example, having a spouse who also owns a business increases the likelihood of business ownership by
10.6 times for a foreign-born Hispanic and by 8.5 for a foreign-born Asian member of labor force, if other
conditions are held constant. This result suggests the possibility that a much stronger family involvement occurs
in business ownership among foreign-born persons than native-born persons. This pattern is consistent with
the literature that emphasizes ethnic resources and family/kinship ties related to ethnic and immigrant
entrepreneurship (Moya 2007). Our interviews with Hispanic and Asian women business owners also support
such a hypothesis. Another interesting variable is working hours. While longer working hours are associated
with lower levels of business ownership for all ethnic groups, they are associated with higher probabilities of
entrepreneurship for the foreign-born, especially for foreign-born Asians. In addition, although having a
bachelor’s degree is not a significant variable for most groups, an Asian holding a bachelor’s degree is
significantly less likely to own a business than members of other ethnic groups. This finding is consistent with
the pattern observed earlier that many Asian businesses are concentrated in low-skilled and service-oriented
sectors.
Although foreign-born persons are more likely to own businesses than U.S.-born when other conditions are held
constant, either within the foreign-born group or the entire labor force in Mecklenburg County, ethnic or racial
minority groups are significantly less likely to own businesses, compared with non-Hispanic whites, if all other
conditions are held constant. Specifically, when compared with whites and holding other variables the same, the
likelihood of business ownership will reduce by 55 percent for blacks, 38 percent for Hispanics, and 35 percent
for Asians.
3. Job Earnings of Business Owners
Table 3 provides the individual and household characteristics that are associated with job earnings for business
owners. We restricted the sample to employed civilians in the labor force who worked at least 40 hours per
week. The results indicate that, in Mecklenburg County, female business owners earn 46.8 percent less than
male business owners when all other variables in the model are held constant. In addition, results from the total
sample suggest that being older, having a college degree, being married, and working longer hours are all
positively correlated with higher job earnings. Compared with non-Hispanic whites, black, Hispanic, and Asian
business owners earn much less if holding other conditions the same.
Again, due to the dominant proportion of U.S.-born entrepreneurs in the total sample, the same pattern holds
true for U.S.-born whites. However, some interesting variations are apparent when considering minority groups
separately. For U.S.-born blacks, a college degree and longer working hours are the only two variables
associated with higher job earnings. Female U.S.-born black business owners do not earn significantly less than
their co-ethnic male counterparts if other conditions are the same. In addition, having a college degree will
increase black business owners’ job earnings by almost 95 percent. These findings indicate that human capital
could significantly improve economic prospects for the U.S.-born, particularly non-Hispanic blacks.
15
Table 3: Characteristics Associated with Higher Job Earnings for Business Owners
Variable Total U.S.-born White
U.S.-born Black
Foreign-born
Foreign-born Hispanic
Foreign-born Asian
Female -0.468*** -0.366*** -0.392 -0.678*** -0.543* -1.499***
Age 0.289** 0.271* -0.073 0.412 0.569 0.872
Bachelor’s degree 0.458*** 0.466*** 0.949** 0.241 0.03 -0.21
Married 0.170* 0.178* 0.145 0.11 0.089 0.336
Family size -0.014 0.005 -0.102 -0.017 0.089 -0.071
Spouse -0.032 -0.053 0.636 -0.137 -0.429 -0.538
Female* spouse 0.111 0.013 -0.182 0.412 0.184 1.018*
Female* degree -0.042 -0.084 -0.436 0.244 0.542 1.312**
Work hour 0.031*** 0.035*** 0.025*** 0.019*** 0.027** 0.002
Foreign-born -0.074
Female*foreign-born 0.094
Black -0.308*** -0.115
Hispanic -0.286* -0.191
Asian -0.282* -0.166
Mixed race -0.378 0.032
English -0.018 0.12 -0.744* Years in the United States 0.012* 0.028* 0.013
_cons 7.945*** 7.788*** 9.328*** 7.811*** 6.093*** 7.713***
Adj-R2
N 2001 1407 198 351 101 89 Dependent Variable: job earnings; legend: * p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001 Data Source: American Community Survey 2007–2011
For the foreign-born business owners, women earn about 68 percent less than men. Longer working hours and
longer length of stay in the United States are positively related to higher job earnings for all foreign-groups. With
regard to specific ethnic groups, a similar pattern holds true for foreign-born Hispanics. In contrast, Asian
business ownership patterns are distinctive. Specifically, Asian female business owners earn almost 1.5 times
less than their co-ethnic male counterparts if other conditions are held the same.
The earlier logistic regression suggests that having a college degree is significantly related to lower probability
of business ownership for the Asian labor force, regardless of gender. Similar to this pattern, having a college
degree is negatively (but not statistically significantly) associated with foreign-born Asian business owners’ job
earnings. Likewise, English proficiency is also negatively associated with Asian business owners’ job earnings.
This overall pattern is consistent with Asian business concentration patterns in the study area. Such a pattern
suggests that foreign-born Asian business owners are working in the job sectors that require more human
capital than they actually are holding.
16
Such an “unemployment” phenomenon has been documented for the foreign-born nationally and is especially
more severe for Asian (De Jong & Madamba 2001). The reasons are many. Job-searching strategies, immigrants’
unfamiliar with host-country labor regulations, visa status, nontransferable education credentials, and other
economic and cultural differences between source and destination countries have all contributed to the
imperfect transferability of human capital across borders (Chiswick & Miller 2009). Even so, having a college
degree will significantly increase female business owners’ job earning by 1.3 times. In other words, for a foreign-
born Asian female business owner, having a bachelor’s degree or higher will significantly offset earning
disadvantages from their co-ethnic male counterparts.
Overall, the results indicate lower job earnings for female entrepreneurs. In general, human capital such as
educational attainment and English proficiency and longer lengths of stay in the United States for the foreign-
born could bring better economic prospects for business owners, particularly for foreign-born Asian women
business owners in Mecklenburg County.
4. Experiences of Female Business Owners
(1) Motivation and Goals for Women Business Owners
Women start their businesses for many different reasons. For most women interviewed, however, starting a
business seemed to be a choice rather than a necessity. Some women chose to go into business for themselves
because they had a different and more entrepreneurial type of personality than other individuals. This
“entrepreneurial personality” was the primary motivation for opening their business. Other women cited
different reasons—owning a business helps them to balance work and family; they make more money in
business for themselves; entrepreneurship allows them to get out of a corporate environment and gives them
more freedom and flexibility. Entrepreneurship also is a way to avoid the “glass ceiling” many women face in
companies, allowing them to obtain equal wages with men. “I started the business to have the freedom to do
whatever I wanted to do and to be able to be the big boss…to be able to decide my own life and build my own
future,” one entrepreneur said. Participants often described themselves as hard working and determined. They
were motivated, had a vision, and wanted to execute it their own ways.
Many women reported that opening a business made sense for them because they were able to leverage
experience from former careers into a successful business. This theme was consistent across black and white
women’s experiences. For instance, one woman said, “I was a financial advisor at Merrill Lynch, and my
business partner was a former lawyer. So it made sense for us to take those skills and launch the business.”
African American women in particular often reported that they came from families who worked in similar
industries or who were entrepreneurs themselves. This factor was a major influence on their decision to open
the business they currently operate. One commented, “My father is a business owner, so he was really
instrumental in giving me a lot of tips on what to do and what to look out for.” This finding indicates that family
heritage could be an important influence for ethnic minorities in starting their businesses. In fact, Fairlie & Robb
(2007) have argued that lack of family support and cultural tradition could be one factor that is related to the
overall lower rate of business ownership among African Americans in the United States.
Compared with native-born white and black women business owners, most Asian and Hispanic business
owners are foreign born. The women interviewed did not talk much about how former experiences played a
role in starting their businesses. As we discussed earlier in the quantitative analyses related to
underemployment, perhaps their stay in the host country is not long enough; in many cases their past
17
background is not relevant or even not fully recognized (Wang & Lysenko 2013). However, many of them
indicated that family members, even extended family members, have been heavily involved in their businesses
in roles such as providing labor and or serving as subcontractors. As discussed later, the operation strategies,
social networking, and perception of overall market opportunities among foreign-born female entrepreneurs
are related to family and ethnic ties.
Women business owners tend to be more holistic in measuring their success and goals, and they tend to run
their businesses differently than men. Like men, women measure their success in dollars but they also consider
their values, vision, community contributions, greater purpose in life, and how they can combine work with
family. The women we spoke with are more collaborative in their leadership style than men and more inclusive.
They do not want to be compared with men/male-owned businesses in terms of revenue or other strictly
empirical measures of success because they want to set their own rules, standards, and values for their
companies. Across all ethnic groups, women business owners shared these sentiments:
“I always tell my customers: I’m there to make money but also I like to be there to help as well.
So I do, I want them to tell me honestly what their need is. We always try to help out.”
“At the end, it’s not about the money or about being the CEO or making a billion dollars. It’s just
about that impact that you can make.”
“I’m sure not going to be a million-dollar mom doing this business because with startups they
usually don’t have a big budget, but it’s my passion. I am happier to see that I help someone to
another step than knowing that I had so much profit at the end of the day.”
“The personal goal has always been, if I’m going to help my children, I have to help the other
children as well, because nobody should be told that they can’t achieve their dream, no matter
what it is. So I give back to the community in various ways, either with my time, through dollars,
through scholarship development.”
“Whatever time I have available and right now I put my family number one in my life, rather
than working and making money.”
For the women we spoke with, it is not that making money is not important. Instead, being a wife, a mother, and
a family member often matters more than making money. Most of the women stated that they run their
businesses in what they perceive to be a manner unique from other similar types of businesses. Such differences
are reflected in their daily operations, as the women often hinted at alternative, more “feminine” management
strategies. For instance, one woman shared, “It’s kind of a cliché to say we’re ‘family oriented,’ but you can go
into the back of our office right now and you can see a garden that we’ve all planted...we pick those vegetables
and we bring them into our kitchen, and we make lunch for staff.”
Many of them use the business for the fulfillment of both personal and professional goals and operate their
businesses accordingly. Another woman commented, “I have different opinions, from a business and marketing
perspective—if we do these things and we’re different than everybody else, then that will benefit us.” Another
18
shared, “Initially when I started [the business], it was just to get out of corporate America. Now it’s actually
turned into my ministry.”
(2) Between Work and Family: Joy, Responsibility, and Sometimes Struggle
Women’s critical role in family life has identified as an important factor in defining women’s job priorities, type
of employment, location of work, and work hours (Reskin 1993; Carlson 1997; McDowell 2008). For instance,
the spatial entrapment-of-women hypothesis argues that women’s domestic responsibilities have restricted
their spatial mobility in searching for jobs. In addition, women in female-segregated jobs work closer to home
compared with not only men but also other women working in non-female-segregated job sectors (England
1993; Hanson & Pratt 1992). Our study corroborates these findings to some extent, because the women
interviewed told us that work-life or work-family balance is on the forefront of their experiences, across ethnic
groups. Even though more women are working and women are working more than in previous generations,
they are still primarily responsible for all or much of the work at home (e.g., cleaning, cooking, and grocery
shopping) and child care—sometimes by choice, but often by necessity. They want to be there for their family
and adjust their work accordingly. Running a business while taking care of the family as a partner, a mother, and
a family member is a mixture of joy, responsibility, and sometimes struggle.
(2.1) Balancing With Family Responsibilities
For some female business owners, balancing between home and work has been a struggle. Among Hispanic and
Asian business owners in particular, we often heard resentment of the long working hours required to operate
the business. One stated, “… having a family and also running a business, it’s a lot of work. I’m here from 7:45 to
6:30, long hours. So I’m glad that I only have one kid.” Another woman agreed—owning a business makes it
harder to find a work-life balance because you are always working: “I work around the clock. The only time that
I don’t work is when I go to bed.” And another: “My own life? When I sleep that is my own life.” A third voice
echoes the sentiment, “It’s very hard, the balance. To me, we are immigrants, we don’t have much choice.”
Some of the resentment, it seems, comes from the women comparing themselves with males. Carrying much or
all of the house work and child care responsibilities makes it more difficult for women to fully dedicate their
time to the business. One Hispanic woman expressed her frustration, “I see my competitors who are men, who
are able to dedicate themselves entirely to their business. They have far outpaced me, and they started long
after I did. But I have to make strategic choices about who I’m going to be as a wife and a mom, and I couldn’t
make that sacrifice.”
Another Hispanic participant expressed similar sentiments: “It’s hard because I have to run the business myself,
as a single mother, it’s hard. But it’s not really hard to run a business as a woman, I mean, men are not smarter
than us, ha-ha, no way, we have both the same capabilities. You have to learn to be organized, focused, things
like that, you have to prepare yourself, and every day you have to learn. But we have a disadvantage: we are
mothers. And we care much more about our families and our kids.”
Talking about the “disadvantage” of being a mother does not mean that these women resent this role and
associated responsibilities. In fact, because of their love and dedication to the family, they work “extra” hard to
make up the time for their own businesses.
Some business owners have difficulty separating work from life. One woman stated, “My professional and
private lives are so intertwined. It’s hard for me to tell the difference...I’m always marketing, I’m always learning,
19
I’m attending conferences; travel becomes business.” Some accept this lifestyle, but others say it affects them
negatively. One participant even lives in the same building as her office so she never fully leaves work behind.
For that reason, interviewees emphasized the importance of consciously making a separation in order to avoid
becoming overworked. For example, “Sometimes you take too much from here to home and you cannot sleep
very well but you learn to leave everything here…it’s a question of being organized and then dedication, you
know, you have to have your time, each thing have your space and your time. And when it’s time for the family,
that’s time for the family and when it’s the business time you have to say, ‘I cannot be thinking about this or that,
it’s the business.’” Others have been able to strategically combine work with their social life: “When I go to do
networking, my tapas, you know, we’re a small group and we go to a different restaurant every month and I sit
talking to my friends and sometimes I meet somebody else, drink a couple of wines, that’s my personal life.”
Maintaining this separation of work and home may be more difficult for those who work from home. One
African American entrepreneur who works from home stated, “…And that’s why this doesn’t look like a
business. Cause it’s our home. And I don’t intend for my family to fall over my boxes and have to wade through
my papers.”
Another said, “For me it’s challenging because at some point in my business life I decided to let go of the office
and come work from the house so I could spend more time and be at home when the kids came home from
school. So that I could have a balance. I found I was spending too much time outside of the house, so bringing the
office to the house has been really positive in some aspects but really challenging in other aspects because I
could be working and talking to a client and my 6-year-old can walk in and say ‘Mommy, I need…’”
(2.2) Not All About “Balancing”
Although some women experienced strain as a result of attempting to “balance” work and home, other
interviewees actually reported that owning a business makes this task easier. As mentioned above, some
women started a business because working for themselves allowed them to have flexibility in order to spend
time with family—to them, this results in a better “work-life balance.” As one women expressed, “The reason
why I started the company was I used to work at a company doing a lot of projects and traveling a lot. I had two
small children and I thought that I could do this on my own and have a more flexible schedule, because I wanted
to be home with them.”
Many others praised the flexibility to work from home and set their own schedules, citing examples of using the
flexibility working for themselves allowed to take time for their children, elderly family members, and family
chores at home. One woman stated, “The only thing that I can tell you is that I have a really good daughter. She’s
really very good and very respectful and when I tell her, ‘Mommy’s working, I need you to sit still, go watch a
movie or I need to finish this,’ she’s very good about that. I have to bring her sometimes. She’s been with me in
all kinds of meetings and trainings and seminars and presentations since she was three years old.”
The women interviewed are well aware that many of the domestic tasks they balance with their work are not of
concern to their male counterparts. One woman said, “I think that women business owners need more flexibility
in their lives as they juggle family and business. I’ve been very fortunate to have that…I’ve been very fortunate
to be able to be flexible and involved in my children’s lives but also to have a business. Men may not need that
flexibility.”
Age and experience may have taught these business owners to make sure to carve out time for family
commitments. They emphasize the importance of maintaining a healthy balance between work and personal
20
life. One woman said, “I had to slow down, because, once you start doing everything that’s all about business,
then you forget about family life and then you stressed out. So you’re not as effective. So you make sure you have
some ‘Me Time.’” Another echoed these sentiments, “Trying to remember to have the balance of work and life
has been something that’s interesting…I ran into somebody recently that I hadn’t seen in several years, and the
person said, ‘You look like you’ve been going pretty hard.’ And I would get to work first thing in the morning, go
to networking things, but I want to remember that…I want to have a life.”
Some of the women expressed their distaste for the term “balance” when used to describe the process of
allocating time between their various commitments. According to one woman, “It’s not ‘balance.’ I don’t like that
word, personally. There’s not a balance. At the end of the day, you do what you do.” Another agreed, “I think
work-life balance in general is bullshit (laughs). You can put that in there. It’s about day-to-day prioritizing.”
This strong emotional reaction from some of the women about the term “work-life balance” further illustrates
the salience of family factors in the women entrepreneurs’ daily work experiences and the struggle they
experience trying to merge the two priorities.
Compared with Hispanic and Asian groups, more white and black women business owners shared that they
carve out time from their work for family. The interview data suggest that this is more of a choice than a
constraint. This seems consistent with results from the regression modeling (Table 2).
As discussed earlier, longer working hours are negatively associated with the probability of owning a business
for native-born white and blacks, yet positively related with business ownership for the foreign-born, especially
Asians. This finding could be attributable to the different types of businesses often owned by the immigrant
entrepreneurs. On the other hand, it could also be because of differing attitudes toward work and family, lack of
social support, and the more formidable constraints facing Hispanic and Asian female business owners, most of
whom are first-generation immigrants. Nevertheless, one foreign-born Latina who owns a catering business
shared a particularly noteworthy experience. She said, “The good thing about my business is that I really enjoy
it, and when I do it, I take kids with me. I have a 15-year-old and 4-year-old. So my husband comes with me, he
washes the dishes when we have private events in the dining room that we rent, and my oldest helps out with
the clients when we’re having a party in the dining room. And then some days I bring the little one, and she stays
in the kitchen eating the leftovers.” In her case, she has tried to make her work experience meaningful both
personally and professionally. And, according to our data and her compelling story, she does find fulfillment in
both of these arenas.
Overall, our findings indicate that having a business can be an asset and a barrier to balancing between work
and family life for women. Regardless of their feelings about “work-life balance” or the extent to which they
were able to achieve this elusive goal on a daily basis, most of the women agreed that making a very intentional
effort to have this “balance” was extremely important to avoid being completely swallowed by their careers.
(3) Perception of Women Business Owners
(3.1) Disadvantages
Since entrepreneurship and higher managerial positions are viewed by some as masculine in nature and thus
unsuitable for women (Billing 2011; Blake & Hanson 2006), researchers have long noted lower rates of business
ownership among women as well as a clustering effect of women in junior managerial roles (Brannan & Priola
2012). To illustrate this popular bias, Katila & Eriksson (2013) found that, when images of male and female
CEOs are directly compared, women are viewed as lacking interpersonal skills while their male counterparts are
21
instead seen as naturally gifted leaders. Many of our participants shared similar experiences of being
disadvantaged as a female business owner due to such faulty perceptions about their abilities. These
disadvantages arise from gender stereotyping; customer discrimination; difficulties in connecting to broader,
male-dominant social networks; and the difficulties of managing between family roles and work as described in
the previous section.
As for gender stereotyping, our participants across all the ethnic groups shared with us that negative
perceptions about their abilities as business owners are related to several specific attitudes they noticed from
customers, peers, and others: what products that women-owned businesses are “supposed” to provide;
whether women are “able or have the capabilities to do a good job,” and how women obtained the opportunities
if their businesses are successful. For instance, one Hispanic woman said, “When I went to look for funding, the
first reaction that people would have is: ‘Oh, you have a restaurant, right?’ And I’m like: ‘No, I don’t have a
restaurant, I have an engineering firm.’” Another woman said, “Because I’m a woman and I run a construction
company, there’s a perception that it’s because I’ve got a leg up. And while I will absolutely admit that some of
the opportunities I’ve gotten are because of that, the reason we’re successful is because we’re a damn good
company. So if I could change a perception a little bit, I think there’s a perception that women-owned and
minority-owned businesses are not as good as other businesses.”
Several business owners also shared that assumptions about women not being as good as men at dealing with
money have impacted their ability to access capital, which is one of the most important factors for startup. “It
was very difficult to have access to capital as a single woman, even though I was married but it was my
business,” one participant said. Another said, “Financially they wouldn’t lend me…so I’m kind of dragging, and
that’s just the reality…I just need the financial support and I don’t have that yet. Maybe I can build that myself,
and I’m trying.” Most women reported using their personal savings and occasionally family financial support to
fund their business.
On the customer side, when dealing with male clients, women business owners often perceive a lack of trust and
a slower process of trust building, especially when compared with their male business partners. For instance,
one woman commented, “I find a lot of times with men who are clients, sometimes the lines get blurred and
they don’t look at you as a professional businesswoman. Sometimes they see sideways, for lack of a better
word.” Another agreed, “Because I have a male partner, sometimes they think ‘Oh, well we’ll go to him and see
what kind of different answer we get.’ And it’s like, no, um, really the final decision is mine, and I don’t need to
defer to him to make this decision to tell you what needs to be done.”
According to interviewees, this problematic attitude is present among both men and women, both of whom may
be intimated by the female business owner’s power. Women may also mistreat other women if they see them as
a threat. As one entrepreneur said, “I’ve worked for women who were very driven...driven to the point of being a
very selfish leader. They don’t lead very well. They don’t have good leadership skills. What they fear anybody
who has anything that they reflect as a good leadership skill or something that may knock them out of their
spot.”
In order to overcome or navigate some of the challenges, women entrepreneurs must be strong and adapt to
their work environment in order to succeed. The women said that they may have to work extra hard, or adapt a
more ‘masculine’ communication style or body language in order to overcome discrimination. One participant
22
even shortened her name to a gender-neutral name so that, in email correspondence, the client does not know
whether she is female or male. Another woman said, “I think you need to be very, very strong minded. Maybe it’s
because of my personality also, but I don’t feel any difference from any male doing business with both the clients
and my supplier at the same time. But I think a lot of it has to do with how you look at yourself. You don’t think
of yourself as ‘Oh, I’m a female, people might look at me differently.’ No, I think you just have to be strong
minded yourself.” Someone even reacted more “proactively” by saying, “There’s a way of acting, a way of
speaking, and dressing. In a man’s world, I always made it a point that I didn’t want to have, it sounds terrible,
but to be too sexy or too frumpy.”
This negative perception and stereotyping of female business owners ran across ethnic and racial groups.
Detangling the interaction effect between gender and race or ethnicity was difficult. However, the challenge
seemed more pronounced for African American when compared with white women. One African American
woman said, “A woman of color, a female entrepreneur, really has to prove herself all the way across the board,
even in the financial arena, in order to get the same respect financially as men do.” Another said, “I do think it’s a
challenge being a woman and being black. I definitely think I’ve missed out on some opportunities because of
that, but I can’t quantify it because how would I know?”
These comments are only a few of many similar ones, suggesting much greater difficulty for women business
owners of color in breaking through the social barriers in place in order to access broader networks and
opportunities.
(3.2) Role of Culture
For Hispanic and Asian women entrepreneurs, the overt discrimination described by many of African American
participants is not present—rather, the discrimination is more subtle. A Hispanic woman lamented, “There’s
still a stereotype of Latina women where most people consider us sexy…But they don’t think we’re capable of
being part of corporate America or a business owner.” In contrast to white and African American interviewees,
some of our Asian and Hispanic participants argued that gender is neither a problem nor an advantage, making
statements such as “I never felt that because I’m a woman I cannot do this” or “I’m not aware of any barriers or,
any particular advantage or disadvantage.”
However, some evidence of conflicting feelings about gender- and ethnic group-based discrimination amongst
these women exists. For instance, an Asian business owner may in one breath express that being a woman
makes no difference at all but will subsequently provide examples of situations or feelings where it does seem to
matter: “To me it doesn’t really matter. It’s in the same way, maybe it’s my personality…But, with the people
who don’t want to pay and run out, they do look at us as girls or women standing up at the front…I think if
there’s a male standing up at the front…they are not as likely to do it.”
Another Asian participant said, “It’s not all bad, it’s not all bad…you just have to play the game…you try to ignore
some of the behaviors…but then eventually you say, ‘You know what? I am tired. I don’t want to put up with
that.’ I do still feel that the environment is accepting, but I don’t think they consciously do it but there is still that
vibe somewhere, like you are always being questioned, or you have to prove yourself even more. I have to do
extra work or I have to do a whole lot better…it’s a lot of pressure. I feel like you are put in a position where you
can’t fail. I feel like some of the males…the way they behave is like ‘you got yourself this far, you know, being in a
male environment, then you shouldn’t complain or you shouldn’t feel a certain way because, you know, this is
what you put yourself into.’ Or this is kind of what you asked for.” These conflicting feelings indicate that being a
23
woman should not matter, but, in reality, these women are still confronted with the reality of their gender-based
disadvantage and must deploy various strategies in order to overcome it
Such conflicting statements also may reflect differing cultural attitudes regarding the role of gender in culture
and society. For example, one Asian business owner said, “For Asians, we are subject to husband, and it’s natural
for us to have husband get all the glory, and we do all the work, ha-ha. I don’t feel any discrimination. Maybe I’m
just accepting the woman’s role as submissive to husband. Even in business, I just take that position. Some
people might be rebellious against the social norm, but I’m not that kind of person. When you accept that kind of
role, as your way of life, I don’t think anybody should feel any disadvantage.”
This way of understanding her role as a female entrepreneur stands in stark contrast to that reported by many
of the native-born white and black women who expect and explicitly express that they should be treated equally
to men. They are dissatisfied when they are not. Another woman told us that “at the beginning when I first
started sending out CVs to apply for positions I felt: why am I not getting any response? I thought it was because,
at the end of my application, it says ethnicity, gender, and I thought maybe if I don’t fill this out, maybe I’ll have a
better chance.”
Again, gender does not always and does not necessarily play a role in the success of women business owners or
in how they are perceived, but they are likely to face the assumptions of a paternalistic society in which men
most commonly lead businesses. Current female entrepreneurs benefit from improved gender equality and
more opportunities than previously generations, but full equality has not yet been achieved.
(3.3) Advantages and Gender Capital
An emerging body of literature has identified the role of gender as a form of social and cultural capital that may
play a key role in entrepreneurship and work performance—in other words, researchers have recently begun to
take note of the fact that women can bring special assets to a firm or business. Individual firms have been noted
to be positively affected when successfully harnessing engendered capital resources (Shaw et al. 2009).
Furthermore, female managers (or those who employ “feminine” styles of management) have been shown to be
more effective when conducting employee disciplinary business (Cole 2004). Women in managerial roles also
enjoy less work-related help from their professional network than do men of equal job responsibility (McGuire
2002).
In our study, while occasionally, some women adamantly insisted there is no difference between male and
female entrepreneurs, others viewed their gender as an asset. According to them, entrepreneurship brings
independence, confidence, purpose, and helps them contribute to society. Furthermore, “female” assets such as
being good at communicating, multi-tasking, and having strong intuition can be leveraged as assets to improve
business performance. One Asian woman shared, “It is easier for me to communicate with [the suppliers], my
husband finds that. He says, ‘He gave you that deal? He didn’t give that to me!’ I really think that that’s an
advantage.” Likewise, an African American physician stated, “I think patients appreciate female physicians. They
say that female physicians are much more cautious, and we have a better ear. And we hear more. We’ve got that
female intuition that men don’t have.”
Women have been noted to take advantage of “gender capital” when entering into a “caring field” such as
nursing or day care, in that they fully espouse the ideals of femininity and femaleness (Huppatz 2009). In our
24
study, participants indeed shared thoughts on the advantages of working in particular industries, such as
interior design and health care. For example, a woman working in interior design stated, “In my field, in my area
of business? I don’t think it’s hard to be a woman, I think it’d be harder to be a man.”
It is important to emphasize that such effects could have unintended negative consequences by reinforcing
existing patterns of gender-based occupational segregation. For several decades, researchers have documented
that male and female members of the labor force are often segregated into different occupations. Likewise,
female-owned businesses and male-owned businesses are concentrated in different industries (McDowell 2008;
Wang 2013). On the one hand, women could have greater advantages in these gender-specific businesses.
However, on the other hand, these patterns of segregation also could further encourage the feminization of
these “pink-collar” businesses while negatively affecting women’s income earnings (Ehlers & Main 1998).
(4) Social Networking and Social Capital
As stated earlier, previous studies have documented that social networking and social capital are extremely
important for both business startup and development (Hanson & Blake 2009; Mayer 2008). The critical role of
networking and referrals is one of the strongest themes that emerged from our interview data. The women
entrepreneurs we spoke with have used their social networks extensively for hiring employees and
subcontractors, finding clients, and forming partnerships with other businesses. Most of our participants
indicate that they do very little advertising. Instead, they locate the majority of their clients through networking,
referrals, targeted recruitment, and repeat businesses.
There are different types of social capital and networking. Professional business organizations such as Count Me
In, Women Executives, and Leadership Charlotte have played a significant role in the development of our
interviewees’ businesses by providing them with extensive networking opportunities. One woman commented,
“The way that it is in Charlotte is that Charlotte has a lot of different groups. You cannot just go and jump into a
group; you have to be invited into the group…The only problem is that, after you are in all these circles, then
everybody wants you. And they say, ‘we need a Latino,’ ha-ha.”
Membership in one of these organizations may not always translate directly into a more business, but
participants do seem to believe that their involvement is rewarding from a professional development and social
networking perspective. According to most of the women, such organizations represent supportive
environments that help to connect business owners to resources. Through them, women share best practices
and help one another: “We are so connected, like sisterhood.” “We cry, we laugh, we dance, we support each
other.” “It was a very nice experience that helped me a lot. I started jumping from another step, another step,
another step.”
In many cases, professional networking, social networking, personal life, and businesses are all intertwined for
women business owners, as illustrated by this woman’s comment: “My clientele is my family. I’ve lost my
parents. I consider my clientele—my friends—to be family.”
Unfortunately, not all women entrepreneurs have access to these networks. When asked what opportunities are
available to them to meet other female business owners and get support for the business, many stated that
nothing is being offered. This perception could be due to lack of information. Moreover, membership in some of
these networks may be less accessible for those with very small budgets, as some of them charge annual fees.
Others may face barriers to membership; for example, they may lack additional personnel at their businesses
25
and must be physically be at their workplaces for long hours. For these women, there is little time for
networking. They may depend more on local ties than citywide ones.
Levels of access to these professional and social networks are related to gender, race, and ethnicity. One African
American woman lamented, “We’re not necessarily at the table. And the table is not the conference table. The
table is the golf course, it’s the gym, it’s the social setting and the affluent communities. Among the rich people.
That’s where the major decisions are actually made. And we’re not invited to that table. In a lot of cases, we
really get the crumbs, what falls from the table.”
In discussing her networking experiences, another commented, “I am surprised that the only ones that ask for
referrals are the men. They are the ones that are taking advantage of the opportunities. I never get a woman
here telling me, ‘I want you to introduce me to the mayor or such-and-such.’ I guess it’s that sense of inferiority,
maybe, I don’t know. I’m conscious of it but it’s unconsciously that you think: I don’t know if I can really do it.”
Many of the women interviewed have been involved with the Charlotte Chamber of Commerce to some degree
at some point in their careers. Their opinions about membership span a broad spectrum, from a woman who
stated that her involvement with the chamber has helped to define her career—with the caveat that she felt
she’d been overlooked by the chamber at the beginning of her career, which spurred her to take a more active
role—to an African American woman who stated, “I found the chamber was not the kind of support that I
thought it would be. And, we could not afford to buy that membership. And we never got any work.” Another
black woman said that the Charlotte Chamber continues to display elements of racism and sexism that may have
defined Charlotte’s business community in years past: “…at the chamber, I can just tell they do not want to talk
to me, you know, they don’t even look my way. And if I look at them, they turn.”
Some women business owners have found a haven at the Latin American Chamber of Commerce (LACC), the
Asian American Chamber of Commerce (AACC), or the Charlotte chapter of the National Association of Women
Business Owners (NAWBO). Though there is diversity within these groups, particularly in terms of industries
represented, members of LACC are mostly Hispanic, AACC members are mostly Asian, and the NAWBO
constituency is predominantly white. Ethnicity and kinship are very important, especially for Hispanics and
Asians. In particular, family members, spouses, and extended family members are often employed for them as
employees or subcontractors.
(5) My Community
An overwhelming majority of our participants stated that philanthropy and giving back to communities is one of
their biggest goals in running the business. This is consistent with our earlier findings, discussed under
“motivations and goals,” that women run businesses differently than men—that they are not primarily focused
on the “bottom line” to make money. For some, this service-based outlook is an integral part of their personal
and professional goals. For example, one woman shared, “One of my missions when I started the business was
to be able to pass along the knowledge. I’ve seen how people fail and the troubles they get in to because they
don’t have that knowledge because they don’t have anyone to ask and they think this costs a lot of money.”
Reasons for doing this include that “Life makes better sense when you’re doing these things because you’re
somehow helping.” Another woman stated, “Giving is at the very center of this company.” And another agreed,
“Women think differently than men do. And I think that’s something really missed in an overall
entrepreneurship study.”
26
Although there are different forms of community involvement, many of them are perceived to be gender
specific, as in the case of mentorship. Several women discussed the importance of their role as mentor to a
variety of different individuals. This important sub-theme was particularly pronounced amongst the African
American women. For instance, one woman stated, “I mentor a lot of our young women, actually some here at
UNC Charlotte and even in the high school.” Another echoed these sentiments, “We had the opportunity to
design the Mentors for Mom program for the Ansor Scholarship Endowment Program [which is] designed to
support mothers going back to college.” She later added, “I’ve had lots of mentoring opportunities, not just for
young people but for older people. I’ve mentored police officers and preachers.” Obviously, the perception that
women are naturally more nurturing and caring than men is reflected in their roles not only in their family and
business management but also in the professional and social roles they assume.
For many women, especially ethnic minorities, their community involvement is tied to their religious and
spiritual beliefs. One Asian woman expressed how her religiosity is tied with her to serve the community: “Live
for others. That’s a Christian value. My husband was raised in that idea of serving others. We raise our kids and
others to be that way, that’s our motto, our house motto.” Another woman expressed a similar sentiment, “And
that was why I changed my business into a ministry. So I could help people.”
For Hispanics and Asians, community involvement often is tied to ethnicity and nationality. One woman shared,
“I’m very involved because I work with the Latin American Chamber of Commerce, I actually provide some of
the workshops in Spanish to educate people who are coming into town and want to establish a business, how to
do it right, and how to understand the difference between Latin American business and running a business over
there versus running a business here, and the different entities that are involved—local, state, and federal.”
Because of the business climate in Charlotte where community and business are perceived to be interconnected,
involvement with communities is regarded as a necessity for successful business ownership. One woman stated
that giving back is mandatory for business owners, “Every company needs to have a philanthropy part to
it….People need to see you more than just the business side. They really need to know where your heart is.”
Another agreed, “A lot of people will not want to do business with you if you’re not involved in the community.
People want to see that you’re a well-rounded business owner, not just out to make money.”
(6) Charlotte’s Business Environment
The metropolitan context of this study is an important factor that has influenced the experiences of
interviewees. Many of them reported that Charlotte is “bursting at the seams with opportunity” due to its status
as an entrepreneurial, pro-business community, and its plentiful opportunities for networking. Some women
specifically said the favorable business climate here in contrast to other parts of the country: “Charlotte has an
appetite for entrepreneurs and supports entrepreneurs.” Another stated, “Coming from a small town, a very
small city in Florida, I thought the entrepreneurial spirit here in Charlotte is just fantastic. There is so much
opportunity.”
One woman attributed this to “all these big corporations, they are creating more opportunities.” Others think
that Charlotte’s professional identity as a growing city and a banking hub attracts capital and people from “all
over the place. And people are coming from other parts of the country to establish businesses in Charlotte.”
Many Hispanic and Asian business owners in particular commented that they have benefitted from an
increasingly diverse and growing group of entrepreneurs in Charlotte. “I find Charlotte to be philanthropic in
nature, supportive. There’s a very good community of Latinos that help each other, there’s a growing business
27
sense. I find it thriving here.” One Latina said, “No matter where I’ve been, coming to Charlotte was the place
where I found my Hispanic roots to the point that I use more Spanish here in Charlotte than I ever did in New
York City.” An Asian woman added, “In the Asian community, some 13 groups work together, it’s very unique.
You cannot see this kind of unity anywhere else in the USA.”
A few women stated that Charlotte has a weak business climate and that small businesses are valued less than
in other places. However, a more common negative experience was that Charlotte is a “clique-ish” city and that,
to be successful, a business owner must “play the game.” Many said that “who know you” not “what you know”
matters in Charlotte. One woman described Charlotte as “very clique-ish” and said, “It’s almost like a game. As
an open and transparent person, I have an issue with that, but I do love it for business.” Another agreed,
“Charlotte is a very good city for business, but you gotta play the game. You’ve gotta be a part of certain groups
to even be considered.” These comments relate back to the earlier discussion about differentiated access to
social networks by gender and ethnicity which, in many cases, translates into differentiated access to resources.
Most of the women who reported that Charlotte is “clique-ish” are African American. This finding may indicate
that ethnic and racial minorities face larger barriers to accessing social capital-related resources.
A significant number of Hispanic and Asian business owners expressed a concern that they lacked support in
starting their businesses for several reasons: insufficient credit, not being in business for more than a year,
being unfamiliar with the financial opportunities available, the confusing process and paperwork involved,
limited opportunities to access health care, and an overall lack of information. Many of these women have little
or no financial support to start and run their businesses, in part because such support is hard to get, but also
sometimes because they were unable to identify possible sources of support in the first place. Instead, they used
their 401k or other savings, or they borrowed from family members.
In reality, there are some resources available to would-be entrepreneurs, but many of the women interviewed,
particularly the foreign-born, are either unfamiliar with them or found them difficult to navigate. This
observation is tied with the main policy recommendation based on the findings: to improve financial support for
women-owned businesses. Such support is most needed when women are first starting their businesses. “I think
what we really need is a source of funds for entrepreneurs in that [startup] stage. We need to have a pool of
investors that entrepreneurs can go and apply for,” one participant suggested. “Such a program would especially
target “minorities because the mainstream society has their own sources of funding. Mainstream society has a
little bit more access I would say and minorities are underserved.” she argued. Opportunities to get financial and
other types of support are also important to grow existing businesses; for instance, to allow a business owner to
start hiring people. Despite the growing numbers of women-owned businesses, most businesses remain small,
and women entrepreneurs are not hiring (m)any employees. Therefore, such support is critical to ensure their
continued success and growth throughout coming years.
V. Conclusions and Recommendations
In Mecklenburg County, rates of business ownership differ based on foreign-born status, gender, and race and
ethnicity. Women, particularly those who are U.S.-born, are much less likely to own a business. The rate of
business ownership is significantly higher for the foreign-born persons than for the U.S.-born labor force. U.S.-
born blacks and women in particular have the lowest rate of business ownership overall.
28
A higher percentage of business owners with at least a bachelor’s degree are women, across all the ethnic
groups. However, the earned income from work is lower for women business owners than for men, and the rate
of business incorporation is lower for women-owned businesses than for businesses owned by men. At the
household level, across all ethnic and racial groups, male business owners are more likely to be married than
female business owners. However, among the business owners, females are much more likely than males to
have a spouse who is also a business owner. In other words, female business owners are more likely to co-own a
business with their spouses than men.
In terms of business types, ethnic and racial minority groups tend to concentrate in a limited number of
industrial sectors, and women-owned businesses are more likely to be concentrated in retail-related,
supportive, and personal services-oriented sectors than businesses owned by men, across all racial and ethnic
groups. Most notably, foreign-born Hispanic are concentrated in professional and management industries more
so than not only their co-ethnic male counterparts but also when compared with other racial or ethnic minority
groups.
Most of the women interviewed started their businesses based on their “entrepreneurial personalities” and
ability to leverage experience from former work as well as for reasons such as better pay, a balance between
work and family, or an escape a corporate environment to thereby obtain more freedom and flexibility. Women
business owners tend to be more holistic in measuring their success and goals, and they tend to run their
businesses differently than men. Women measure their success in dollars, but also based on the business’
compatibility with their values, vision, greater purpose in life, ability to contribute to the community, and
flexibility for balancing work and family. These values are well-incorporated into their leadership styles and
businesses operation strategies.
Work-life or work-family balance is on the forefront of women entrepreneurs’ experiences. For some women,
balancing between home and work has been a struggle due to long working hours compounded by familial
responsibilities. For others, owning a business makes the task of balancing easier because it allows them to have
more flexibility than working for someone else. For most women, it is important to make an intentional effort to
have this balance to avoid being completely swallowed by their careers.
Many but not all participants shared discriminatory experiences and, as result, have the perception that they are
somewhat disadvantaged, compared with other business owners due to their status as female business owners
and/or business owners of color. The disadvantages come from gender stereotyping; customer discrimination;
difficulties in connecting to broader, male-dominant social networks; and the difficulties of managing both
family roles and work. Additionally, women of color may face more difficulties in breaking through the social
barriers to broader networks and opportunities. At the same time, culture in the country of origin plays a role
for many immigrant women business owners in terms of how they view gender’s role in family and at work.
This often stands in stark contrast to the role of gender and family as perceived by many of the native-born
white and black women, who expect and explicitly expressed that they should be treated equally to men; they
are dissatisfied when they are not.
On the other hand, some women adamantly insisted that there is no difference between male and female
entrepreneurs. In some cases, being a female business owner is even considered as an asset. According to these
women, entrepreneurship grants women independence, confidence, and purpose as well as the opportunity to
contribute to society. Furthermore, traditionally ‘female’ assets may be leveraged such as being good at
29
communicating, multitasking, and having strong intuition. The notion that being a woman is an advantage
rather than a disadvantage is concentrated in particular industries, such as interior design and health care.
The women entrepreneurs have used social networks extensively for hiring employees and subcontractors,
finding clients, and forming partnerships with other businesses. Professional business organizations play a
significant role in such development and networking. Ethnicity and kinship are very important, especially for
Hispanic and Asian women. In particular, family members, spouses, and extended family members often work
for the woman’s business as employees or subcontractors. In many cases, professional networking, social
networking, personal life, and businesses are all intertwined for women business owners. However, not all
women entrepreneurs have access to these networks. Many of them said such networks have nothing to offer
them, especially for women with very small budgets, few or no personnel, and those must be physically at work
for long hours. For them, there is little time for networking, and they may depend more on local ties than
citywide ones.
An overwhelming majority of participants stated that philanthropy and giving back to communities is one of
their biggest goals in running their businesses. This is especially true in Charlotte, because the business climate
here is perceived to emphasize the interconnectedness of community and business, and involvement with the
community is commonly regarded as a fundamental component of a successful business plan. Women
entrepreneurs’ community involvement takes many different forms and may be tied with their faith, ethnicity,
or nationality, particularly for foreign-born and ethnic minority women business owners.
Many women business owners perceive Charlotte to be an entrepreneurial, pro-business community with
plentiful opportunities for networking. However, others reported that Charlotte is a “clique-ish” city and that, to
be successful, a business owner has to “play the game.” In particular, ethnic minority women, particularly
African Americans, often expressed their frustration in accessing the opportunities and networks Charlotte has
to offer. A significant number of Hispanic and Asian business owners also reported that they lacked support in
starting their businesses.
Based on the findings and discussions, we recommend the following considerations for the public:
Promote awareness of the contributions of women-owned businesses to both the local business
communities and to the public. Such awareness will help increase understanding regarding the
role of gender in both family and society and overcome problematic gender-based stereotyping
and the related negative perceptions of women business owners.
Programs and organizations that serve women and ethnic minority businesses must do a better
job of addressing and helping women to overcome the specific obstacles they face. Specific
suggestions include supporting and increasing programs that mandate female and minority
participation in business, and integrating child care assistance into startup assistance programs.
Supporting agencies and organizations should provide more avenues for social networking
within local business communities and encourage communication between women-owned
businesses and the supporting groups, especially for ethnic and racial minority women and
small business owners with limited budgets.
Stronger supporting organizations should be developed to provide information, mentoring,
training, technical assistance, and liaison between women-owned businesses and all other
stakeholders.
30
Stronger relationships between women-owned businesses and banks and local financial
institutions should be developed and encouraged.
Because of women entrepreneurs’ strong ties with local communities, local place-based
economic development programs could benefit from integrating women-owned businesses into
their agendas. In this sense, government, local organizations, and women-owned businesses can
partner for community building and neighborhood revitalization.
Immigrant entrepreneurs have tremendous potential to both create new markets and service
existing ones in the Charlotte area. Women-owned businesses are and continue to be a crucial
component of this movement. Although better social and institutional infrastructure serving the
needs of immigrants could help everyone in this region, special attention to the rapid growth of
immigrant and ethnic minority women-owned businesses will benefit the entire region.
Additional analysis should be conducted to understand the two-way interactions between
women-owned businesses and their communities. Insights from these analyses will help to
better inform policies and practices that will contribute to the socioeconomic upward mobility
of women and the ethnic minority labor force, and to the continued revitalization and economic
development of our region.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Women + Girls Research Alliance at UNC Charlotte. Tetiana Lysenko, Jackson
Deziel, and Mike Kvassay provided timely and excellent assistance for this study. Suzanne Leland, Ph.D.,
graciously moderated the focus group discussion with women business owners, and her students from “PPOL
8622 Qualitative Research Analysis” generously helped with the data transcription of the focus group
discussion. Astrid Chirinos at the Latin American Chamber of Commerce of Charlotte helped us reach out to
Latino women business owners. Finally, we appreciate all the women business owners who participated in our
study for sharing their time and insights with us.
31
References
Bergen, D. J., & Williams, J. E. 1992. Sex Stereotypes in the United States Revisited: 1972–1988. Sex Roles, 24(7-
8), 413–423.
Billing, Y. D. 2011. Are women in management victims of the phantom of the male norm? Gender, Work &
Organization, 18(3), 298–317.
Blake, M., & Hanson, S. 2005. Rethinking innovation: Context and gender. Environment and Planning A 37, 681–
701.
Brannan, M., & Priola, V. 2012.Girls Who Do Boys Like They’re Girls’? Exploring the Role of Gender in the Junior
Management of Contemporary Service Work. Gender, Work & Organization 19(2), 119–141.
Carlson, V.L. 1997. The availability of women workers: The effects on company location in the suburbs. New
York: Garland Press.
Chiswick, B. R., & Miller, P. W. 2010. The effects of educational-occupational mismatch on immigrant earnings in
australia, with international comparisons. International Migration Review, 44(4), 869–898.
Cliff, J. E. 1998. Does One Size Fit All? Exploring the Relationship between Attitudes Towards Growth, Gender,
and Business Size. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(6), 523–542.
Cole, N. D. 2004. Gender differences in perceived disciplinary fairness. Gender, Work & Organization, 11(3),
254–279.
Dallalfar, A. 1994. Iranian women as immigrant entrepreneurs. Gender & Society, 8(4), 541–561.
De Jong, G. F., & Madamba, A. B. 2001. A double disadvantage? Minority group, immigrant status, and
underemployment in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 82(1), 117–130.
Ehlers, T. B., & Main, K. 1998. Women and the false promise of microenterprise. Gender & Society, 12(4), 424-
440.
England, P. 1993. Theory on Gender/Feminism on Theory. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Fairlie, R. W., & Robb, A. 2007. Why are black-owned businesses less successful than white-owned businesses?
The role of families, inheritances, and business human capital. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(2), 289–323.
Hanson, S. 2009. Changing places through women’s entrepreneurship. Economic Geography, 85(3), 245–267.
Hanson, S., & Blake, M.K. 2009. Gender and entrepreneurial networks. Regional Studies, 43(1), 135–149.
Hanson, S., & Pratt, G. 1988. Reconceptualizing the links between home and work in urban geography. Economic
Geography, 64, 299–321.
Kaplan, D., & Li, W. 2006. Landscapes of the Ethnic Economy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
32
Kariv, D. 2010. Entrepreneurial orientations of women business founders from a push/pull perspective:
Canadians versus non-Canadians—A multinational assessment. Journal of Small Business and
Entrepreneurship, 24(3), 397–425.
Katila, S., & Eriksson, P. 2013. He is a firm, strong‐minded and empowering leader, but is she? Gendered
positioning of female and male CEOs. Gender, Work & Organization, 20(1), 71–84.
Kepler, E., & S. Shane. 2007. Are Male and Female Entrepreneurs Really That Different? Office of Advocacy. Small
Business Administration.
Levent, T. B., Nijkamp, P., & Sahin, M. 2009. New orientations in ethnic entrepreneurship: motivation, goals and
strategies of new generation ethnic entrepreneurs. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy,
5(1-3), 83–112.
Light, I. H. 2007. Women’s economic niches and earnings inferiority: The view from the ethnic economy. Journal
of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(4), 541–557.
Loscocco, K., Monnat, S. M., Moore, G., & Lauber, K. B. 2009. Enterprising women: A comparison of women’s and
men’s small business networks. Gender & Society, 23(3), 388–411.
Mayer, H. 2008. Segmentation and segregation patterns of women-owned high-tech firms in four metropolitan
regions in the United States. Regional Studies, 42(10), 1357–1383.
McDowell, L. 2008. Thinking through work: Complex inequalities, constructions of difference and trans-national
migrants. Progress in Human Geography, 32(4), 491–507.
McGuire, G. M. 2002. Gender, race, and the shadow structure a study of informal networks and inequality in a
work organization. Gender & Society, 16(3), 303–322.
Moya, J. 2007. Domestic service in a global perspective: Gender, migration and ethnic niches. Journal of Ethnic
and Migration Studies, 33(4), 559–579.
Orser, B., & Dyke, L. 2009. The Influence of Gender and Occupational-role on Entrepreneurs’ and Corporate
Managers’ Success Criteria. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 22(3), 327–354.
Raijman, R., & Semyonov, M. 1997. Gender, ethnicity and immigration: Double disadvantage and triple-
disadvantage among recent immigrants in the Israeli labor market. Gender & Society, 2, 108–125.
Reskin, B. 1993. Sex segregation in the workplace. Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 241–70.
Schrover, M., van der Leun, J., & Quispel, C. 2007. Niches, labour market segregation, ethnicity and gender.
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(4), 529–540.
Shaw, E., Marlow, S., Lam, W., & Carter, S. 2009. Gender and entrepreneurial capital: implications for firm
performance. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 25–41.
Singer, A. 2004. The Rise of New Immigrant Gateways. Washington, DC: The Brooking Institutions.
33
Suro, R. and Singer, A. 2002. Latino Growth in Metropolitan America: Changing Patterns, New Locations (Survey
Series, Census 2000). Washington, DC: Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, the Brookings Institution.
Small Business Administration. 2012
Smith, H., & Furuseth, O. 2006. Latinos in the New South: Transformations of Place. Ashgate Publishing Ltd.,
Aldershot, England.
Waldinger, R., Aldrich, H., & Ward, R. 1990. Ethnic Entrepreneurs: Immigrant Business in Industrial Societies.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Wang. 2009. Gender, ethnicity and self-employment: A multilevel analysis across U.S. metropolitan areas.
Environment and Planning A, 41(8), 1979–1996.
Wang, Q. 2010. How does geography matter in the ethnic labor market segmentation process? A case study of
Chinese immigrants in the San Francisco CMSA. The Annals of Association of American Geographers, 100(1),
182–201.
Wang, Q. 2013. Constructing a multilevel spatial approach in ethnic entrepreneurship studies. International
Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 19(1), 97–113.
Wang, Q., & Lysenko, T. 2013. Underemployment of immigrants in the United States: From a spatial perspective.
Urban Studies. Published online doi: 10.1177/0042098013506043.
Wang, Q. 2014. Foreign-born status, gender, and Hispanic self-employment across U.S. metropolitan labor
markets: A multilevel approach. [Under revision]. Economic Development Quarterly.
Wilson, K.L., & Portes, A. 1980. immigrant enclaves: An analysis of the labor market experiences of Cubans in
Miami. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 295–319.
Zhou, M. 1992. Chinatown: The Socioeconomic Potential of an Urban Enclave. Philadelphia: Temple University
Press.