general overview - arpe & interwork...
TRANSCRIPT
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Bibliography
Linda Tiggs-Taylor, M.B.A., J.D., of California State University, Long Beach developed this bibliography while designing a professional and research integrity distance education course. She has generously granted permission for posting this resource on the CAPRI website. We would like to continue to develop this bibliography by adding current resources that are relevant to specific Professional Science Master’s (PSM) degree programs. Please forward the citations of relevant readings and we will add them to this resource.
General Overview
Allhoff, F., Lin, P., & Steinberg, J. (2011). Ethics of human enhancement: An executive summary.
Science & Engineering Ethics, 17(2), 201-212. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9191-9
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics (Vol. 6th). New York:
Oxford University Press.
Bebeau, M. J., (with Pimple, K. D., Mustkavitch, K. M. T., Borden, S. L., Smith, D. H.). (1995). Moral
reasoning in scientific research: Cases for teaching and assessment. University of Indiana:
Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions.
Bird, S. J. (2003). Ethics as a core competency in science and engineering. Science & Engineering Ethics,
9(4), 443-444.
Bird, S. J. (2010). Responsible research: What is expected? Science & Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 693-
696. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9248-9
Bird, S. J., & Housman, D. E. (1997). Conducting, reporting, and funding research. In D. Elliott & J. E.
Stern (Eds.), Research ethics: A reader. One Court Street, Lebanon, N. H.: University Press of
New England.
Byrd, W. M., & Clayton, L. A. (2001). Race, medicine, and health care in the united states: A historical
survey. J Natl Med Assoc, 93(3), 11S-34S.
Council on Governmental Relations. (2006). Access to and retention of research data rights and
responsibilities: Council on Governmental Relations.
Crane, A., Gilbert, D. U., Goodpaster, K. E., Miceli, M. P., Moore, G., Reynolds, S. J., . . . Wicks, A. C.
(2011). Comments on beq's twentieth anniversary forum on new directions for business ethics
research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 157-187.
Davis, F. D. (2010). In the belly of the whale: Some thoughts on preserving the integrity of the new
bioethics commission. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 20(3), 291-297.
Denny, C. C., & Grady, C. (2007). Clinical research with economically disadvantaged populations.
Journal of medical ethics, 33(7), pp. 382-385.
DuBois, J. M., Schilling, D. A., Heitman, E., Steneck, N. H., & Kon, A. A. (2010). Instruction in the
responsible conduct of research: An inventory of programs and materials within ctsas. Clin
Transl Sci, 3(3), 109-111.
Elliott, D., & Stern, J. E. (Eds.). (1997). Research ethics: A reader. One Court Street, Lebanon, NH:
University Press of New England.
Ethics CORE Digital Library. (2013). from National Center for Professional and Research Ethics
(NCPRE). http://nationalethicscenter.org/
Gert, B. (1997). Morality and scientific research. In D. Elliott & J. F. Stern (Eds.), Research ethics: A
reader (pp. 20-30). One Court Street, Lebanon, NH 03766: University Press of New England.
Gert, B. (2004). Common morality: Decidng what to do. New York: University Press of New England.
Horner, J., & Minifie, F. D. (2010). Research ethics i: Responsible conduct of research (rcr)--historical
and contemporary issues pertaining to human and animal experimentation. J Speech Lang Hear
Res, 54(1), 303-329.
Horner, J., & Minifie, F. D. (2011). Research ethics ii: Mentoring, collaboration, peer review, and data
management and ownership,. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 54(1), 330-345.
Horner, J., & Minifie, F. D. (2011). Research ethics iii: Publication practices and authorship, conflicts of
interest, and research misconduct. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 54(1),
S346-S362. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0263)
MacDougall, M., & Riley, S. C. (2010). Initiating undergraduate medical students into communities of
research practise: What do supervisors recommend? BMC Med Educ, 10, 83.
Pautler, M., & Brenner, S. (2010). Nanomedicine: Promises and challenges for the future of public health.
Int J Nanomedicine, 5, 803-809.
Pritchard, M., & Holtzapple, M. (1997). Responsible engineering: Gilbane gold revisited. Science and
Engineering Ethics, 3(2), 217-230.
Proctor, R. N. (2006). "Everyone knew but no one had proof": Tobacco industry use of medical history
expertise in us courts, 1990-2002. Tob Control, 15 Suppl 4, iv117-125.
Roland, M.-C. (2007). Who is responsible? EMBO reports, 8(8), 706-711. doi:
doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401035
Shamoo, A. E., & Resnick, D. B. (2009). Responsible conduct of research (Second ed.). New York, New
York: Oxford University Press.
Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future
directions. Science & Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53-74.
Willison, D. J., Swinton, M., Schwartz, L., Abelson, J., Charles, C., Northrup, D., . . . Thabane, L. (2008).
Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research:
Insights from a public dialogue. BMC Med Ethics, 9, 18.
Misconduct in Scientific Research
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics (Vol. 6th). New York:
Oxford University Press.
Bird, S. J. (2010). Responsible Research: What is Expected? Science & Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 693-
696. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9248-9
Consoli, L. (2006). Scientific misconduct and science ethics: a case study based approach. Science and
Engineering Ethics, 12(3), 533-541.
Dahlberg, J. E., & Davidian, N. M. (2010). Scientific Forensics: How the Office of Research Integrity can
Assist Institutional Investigations of Research Misconduct During Oversight Review. Science &
Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 713-735. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9208-4
Davis, M., Riske-Morris, M., & Diaz, S. (2007). Causal Factors Implicated in Research Misconduct:
Evidence from ORI Case Files. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(4), 395-414.
Dresser, R. (1997). Giving Scientists their Due: The Imanishi-Kari Decision. The Hastings Center Report,
27(3), 26.
Ethics CORE Digital Library. (2013). from National Center for Professional and Research Ethics
(NCPRE). http://nationalethicscenter.org/
Hamrell, M. R. (2010). Raising Suspicions with the Food and Drug Administration: Detecting
Misconduct. Science & Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 697-704. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9232-4
Horner, J., & Minifie, F. D. (2011). Research Ethics III: Publication Practices and Authorship, Conflicts
of Interest, and Research Misconduct. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 54(1),
S346-S362. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0263)
Johnson, S. (2009). Welcome to the Bioethics Presidency. American Journal of Bioethics, 9(2), 1-2. doi:
10.1080/15265160802708552
Kakuk, P. (2009). The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences. Science &
Engineering Ethics, 15(4), 545-562. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9121-x
Klein, J. E., & Fleischman, A. R. (2002). The Private Practicing Physician--Investigator. Hastings Center
Report, 32(4), 22-26.
Malek, J. (2010). To Tell or Not to Tell? The Ethical Dilemma of the Would-Be Whistleblower.
Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality Assurance, 17(3), 115-129. doi:
10.1080/08989621003791929
Parrish, D., & Noonan, B. (2009). Image Manipulation as Research Misconduct. Science and Engineering
Ethics, 15(2), 161-167.
Powell, K. (2006). So you suspect someone of fraud. What now? Nature medicine, 12(5), 492-492. doi:
10.1038/nm0506-492a
Racker, E. (1997). A View of Misconduct in Research. In D. Elliott & J. E. Stern (Eds.), Research Ethics:
A Reader (pp. 34-42). One Court Street, Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.
Shamoo, A. E., & Resnick, D. B. (2009). Responsible Conduct of Research (Second ed.). New York, New
York: Oxford University Press.
Shuchman, M. (2007). Commercializing clinical trials--Risks and benefits of the CRO boom. The New
England Journal of Medicine, 357(14), 1365-1368. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp078176
Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering Integrity in Research: Definitions, Current Knowledge, and Future
Directions. Science & Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53-74.
Tilden, S. J. (2010). Incarceration, Restitution, and Lifetime Debarment: Legal Consequences of
Scientific Misconduct in the Eric Poehlman Case. Science & Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 737-741.
doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9228-0
Wilson, K., Schreier, A., Griffin, A., & Resnik, D. (2007). Research Records and the Resolution of
Misconduct Allegations at Research Universities. Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality
Assurance, 14(1), 57-71. doi: 10.1080/08989620601126017
Human Subjects
An analysis of factors underlying e-health disparities. (2008). Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics;
CQ, 17(4), 417-428.
Beauchamp, T. L. (2011). Informed consent: Its history, meaning, and present challenges. Cambridge
Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 20(4), 515-523. doi: 10.1017/S0963180111000259
Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions. (2013). Welcome | ethics.Iit.Edu. from
http://ethics.iit.edu/
Chan, S., & Harris, J. (2010). Consequentialism without consequences: Ethics and embryo research.
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 19(1), 61-71. doi: 10.1017/S0963180109990259
Codes of ethics collections | ethics.Iit.Edu. (2013). from Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions
at IIT, http://ethics.iit.edu/research/codes-ethics-collection
Cupp, J., R. L. (2009). Bioethics and the explosive rise of animal law. American Journal of Bioethics,
9(5), 1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160902847953
Czarkowski, M. (2010). The dilemma of dual use biological research: Polish perspective. Science &
Engineering Ethics, 16(1), 99-110. doi: 10.1007/s11948-008-9078-1
Degeling, C., & Johnson, J. (2009). Underdetermined interests: Scientific 'goods' and animal welfare.
American Journal of Bioethics, 9(12), 64-66. doi: 10.1080/15265160903234177
Doerflinger, R. M. (2008). The problem of deception in embryonic stem cell research. Cell Proliferation.
Feb2008 Supplement 1,, 41, 65-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2008.00492.x
Dolgin, J. L. (2010). The legal development of the informed consent doctrine: Past and present.
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 19(1), 97-109. doi: 10.1017/S0963180109990284
Ezekiel, J. E., & Christine, G. (2007). Four paradigms of clinical research and research oversight.
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 16(1), 82-96.
Fenton, E., & Arras, J. D. (2010). Bioethics and human rights: Curb your enthusiasm. Cambridge
Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 19(1), 127-133. doi: 10.1017/S0963180109990326
Fiester, A. (2008). Response to open peer commentaries on justifying a presumption of restraint in animal
biotechnology research. American Journal of Bioethics, 8(6), 1-2. doi:
10.1080/15265160802248526
Fox, R. C., & Swazey, J. P. (2010). Guest editorial: Ignoring the social and cultural context of bioethics is
unacceptable. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 19(3), 278-281. doi:
10.1017/S0963180110000046
Fraser, D. (2008). Understanding animal welfare. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 50, 1-7. doi:
10.1186/1751-0147-50-S1-S1
Gershoff, S. N. (2009). Animal experimentation - a personal view. Nutrition reviews, 67(2), 95-99. doi:
10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00144.x
Hayden, C. (2007). Taking as giving: Bioscience, exchange, and the politics of benefit-sharing. Social
Studies of Science (Sage Publications, Ltd.), 37(5), 729-758. doi: 10.1177/03063127067078012
Holmes, E. (2010). Character, leadership, and the healthcare professions. Journal of Research
Administration, 41(2), 47-47-54.
Horner, J., & Minifie, F. D. (2011). Research ethics iii: Publication practices and authorship, conflicts of
interest, and research misconduct. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 54(1),
S346-S362. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0263)
Houde, L., Dumas, C., & Leroux, T. (2003). Animal ethical evaluation: An observational study of
canadian iacucs. Ethics & Behavior, 13(4), 333-350.
Hurst, S. A., & Mauron, A. (2009). Articulating the balance of interests between humans and other
animals. American Journal of Bioethics, 9(5), 17-19. doi: 10.1080/15265160902788678
John, H. (2007). The method in bioethics research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 16(4),
366-367.
Joon-Ho, Y. U., Sara, G., & Stephanie, M. F. (2009). Race-based medicine and justice as recognition:
Exploring the phenomenon of bidil. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 18(1), 57-67.
Kolar, R. (2006). Animal experimentation. Science & Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 111-122.
Murphy, T. F. (2008). When is an objection to hybrid stem cell research a moral objection? American
Journal of Bioethics, 8(12), 47-49. doi: 10.1080/15265160802568832
Nelson, W., Greene, M. A., & West, A. (2010). Rural healthcare ethics: No longer the forgotten quarter.
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 19(4), 510-517. doi: 10.1017/S096318011000040X
Osborne, N., Payne, D., & Newman, M. (2009). Journal editorial policies, animal welfare, and the 3rs.
American Journal of Bioethics, 9(12), 55-59.
Resnik, D. B., & Kennedy, C. E. (2010). Balancing scientific and community interests in community-
based participatory research. Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality Assurance, 17(4),
198-210. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2010.493095
Rice, M. J. (2011). The institutional review board is an impediment to human research: The result is more
animal based research. Philosophy, Ethics & Humanities in Medicine, 6(1), 12-21. doi:
10.1186/1747-5341-6-12
Robert, J. (2009). Toward a better bioethics. Science & Engineering Ethics, 15(3), 283-291. doi:
10.1007/s11948-009-9134-5
Rossi, J. (2009). Nonhuman primate research: The wrong way to understand needs and necessity.
American Journal of Bioethics, 9(5), 21-23. doi: 10.1080/15265160902788728
Saucier, D. A., & Cain, M. E. (2006). The foundations of attitudes about animal research. Ethics &
Behavior, 16(2), 117-133. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb1602_3
Simm, K. (2011). The concepts of common good and public interest: From plato to biobanking.
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 20(4), 554-562. doi: 10.1017/S0963180111000296
Slowther, A. (2009). Ethics case consultation in primary care: Contextual challenges for clinical ethicists.
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 18(4), 397-405. doi: 10.1017/S0963180109090598
Solbakk, J. H. (2011). In the ruins of babel: Pitfalls on the way toward a universal language for research
ethics and benefit sharing. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 20(3), 341-355. doi:
10.1017/S096318011100003X
Spike, J. (2005). Putting the ethics into research ethics. American Journal of Bioethics, 5(1), 51-53. doi:
10.1080/15265160590927822
Sutrop, M. (2011). Changing ethical frameworks: From individual rights to the common good?
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 20(4), 533-545. doi: 10.1017/S0963180111000272
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1949). Nuremberg code. (Law No. 10, Vol. 2, (pp. 181-
182)). Washington, D. C.: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health.; U. S. Government
Printing Office, Retrieved from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1974). Common rule. Washington, D.C.: United States
Government Printing Office.
US Department Health and Human Services. (2005). Federal policy for the protection of human subjects.
Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/human_subjects/guidance/45cfr46.html.
Visscher, M. B. (1971). Animal welfare act of 1970. Science, 172, 916-917. doi:
10.1126/science.172.3986.916
Whittall, H. (2009). Information on the 3rs in animal research publications is crucial. American Journal of
Bioethics, 9(12), 60-61. doi: 10.1080/15265160903323095
Wilkinson, D. (2009). Trade-offs in suffering and wellbeing: The utilitarian argument for primate stroke
research. American Journal of Bioethics, 9(5), 19-21. doi: 10.1080/15265160902788660
Zoloth, L. (2002). Stem cell research: A target article collection: Part i - jordan's banks, a view from the
first years of human embryonic stem cell research. American Journal of Bioethics, 2(1), 3.
Animal Research
Association for Assessment and Accreditation ofLaboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC).
(2013). Aaalac: About aaalac. from http://www.aaalac.org/about/index.cfm
Cupp, J., R. L. (2009). Bioethics and the explosive rise of animal law. American Journal of Bioethics,
9(5), 1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160902847953
Degeling, C., & Johnson, J. (2009). Underdetermined interests: Scientific 'goods' and animal welfare.
American Journal of Bioethics, 9(12), 64-66. doi: 10.1080/15265160903234177
DeGrazia, D. (1999). The ethics of animal research: What are the prospects for agreement? Cambridge
Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 8(1), 23-34.
Foundation for Biomedical Research. (2008). Fact vs. Myth about the essential need for animals in
medical research. 2013, from
http://www.fbresearch.org/uploadedFiles/FbResearch/Content/Education/Lesson_Plans/Fact
%20vs.%20Myth.pdf
Fraser, D. (2008). Understanding animal welfare. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 50, 1-7. doi:
10.1186/1751-0147-50-S1-S1
Gershoff, S. N. (2009). Animal experimentation - a personal view. Nutrition reviews, 67(2), 95-99. doi:
10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00144.x
Horner, J., & Minifie, F. D. (2010). Research ethics i: Responsible conduct of research (rcr)--historical
and contemporary issues pertaining to human and animal experimentation. J Speech Lang Hear
Res, 54(1), 303-329.
Houde, L., Dumas, C., & Leroux, T. (2003). Animal ethical evaluation: An observational study of
canadian iacucs. Ethics & Behavior, 13(4), 333-350.
Hurst, S. A., & Mauron, A. (2009). Articulating the balance of interests between humans and other
animals. American Journal of Bioethics, 9(5), 17-19. doi: 10.1080/15265160902788678
Kolar, R. (2006). Animal experimentation. Science & Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 111-122.
National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research. (2013). Nc3rs -
journal articles. http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/document.asp?id=1152
Nuffield council on bioethics. (2013). http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/
Osborne, N., Payne, D., & Newman, M. (2009). Journal editorial policies, animal welfare, and the 3rs.
American Journal of Bioethics, 9(12), 55-59.
Radder, H. (Ed.). (2010). The commodification of academic research. Pittsburg PA.: University of
Pittsburg Press.
Resources for Research Ethics Education. (2013). http://research-ethics.net/topics/animal-subjects/
Rice, M. J. (2011). The institutional review board is an impediment to human research: The result is more
animal-based research. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 6(1), 12. doi:
10.1186/1747-5341-6-12
Rossi, J. (2009). Nonhuman primate research: The wrong way to understand needs and necessity.
American Journal of Bioethics, 9(5), 21-23. doi: 10.1080/15265160902788728
Saucier, D. A., & Cain, M. E. (2006). The foundations of attitudes about animal research. Ethics &
Behavior, 16(2), 117-133. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb1602_3
Tillman, R. (2013). Ethical embodiment and moral reasoning: A challenge to peter singer. Hypatia, 28(1),
18-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01242.x
Whittall, H. (2009). Information on the 3rs in animal research publications is crucial. American Journal of
Bioethics, 9(12), 60-61. doi: 10.1080/15265160903323095
Wilkinson, D. (2009). Trade-offs in suffering and wellbeing: The utilitarian argument for primate stroke
research. American Journal of Bioethics, 9(5), 19-21. doi: 10.1080/15265160902788660
Conflict of Interest
Ancker, J. S., & Flanagin, A. (2007). A comparison of conflict of interest policies at peer-reviewed
journals in different scientific disciplines. Science & Engineering Ethics, 13(2), 147-157. doi:
10.1007/s11948-007-9011-z
Barnes, M., & Florencio, P. S. (2002). Financial conflicts of interest in human subjects research: The
problem of institutional conflicts. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 30(3), 390.
Beyer, T., & Czernin, J. (2010). Is conflict of interest in our best interest? (Vol. 37, pp. 1063-1068):
Springer Science & Business Media B.V.
Bird, S. J., & Spier, R. E. (2005). The complexity of competing and conflicting interests (Vol. 11, pp.
515-517): Springer Science & Business Media B.V.
Bird, S. J., & Spier, R. E. (2008). A conflict of interest disclosure policy for science and engineering
ethics. Science & Engineering Ethics, 14(2), 149-152. doi: 10.1007/s11948-008-9073-6
Boyd, E., & Bero, L. (2007). Defining financial conflicts and managing research relationships: An
analysis of university conflict of interest committee decisions. Science and Engineering Ethics,
13(4), 415-435. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9041-6
Carroll, K. A., & McGee, G. (2002). Conflict of interest and the american journal of bioethics. American
Journal of Bioethics, 2(3), 1-2. doi: 10.1162/152651602760249950
Gingras, Y., & Gosselin, P.-M. (2008). The emergence and evolution of the expression conflict of
interests in science : A historical overview, 1880-2006. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(3),
337-343.
Glaser, B. E., & Bero, L. A. (2005). Attitudes of academic and clinical researchers toward financial ties in
research: A systematic review. Science & Engineering Ethics, 11(4), 553-573.
Henry, D., Doran, E., Kerridge, I., Hill, S., McNeill, P. M., & Day, R. (2005). Ties that bind: Multiple
relationships between clinical researchers and the pharmaceutical industry. Archives of Internal
Medicine, 165(21), 2493-2496. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.21.2493
International Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). (2013). International electrical and electronics
engineers (ieee) code of ethics. Retrieved April 23, 2013, from
http:www.ieee.org/portal/pages/iportals/aboutus/ethics/code.html
Katz, D., Caplan, A. L., & Merz, J. F. (2010). All gifts large and small: Toward an understanding of the
ethics of pharmaceutical industry gift-giving. American Journal of Bioethics, 10(10), 11-17. doi:
10.1080/15265161.2010.519226
Kerridge, I., Maguire, J., Newby, D., McNeill, P. M., Henry, D., Hill, S., . . . Henderson, K. (2005).
Cooperative partnerships or conflict-of-interest? A national survey of interaction between the
pharmaceutical industry and medical organizations. Internal Medicine Journal, 35(4), 206-210.
doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0903.2004.00799.x
MacDonald, C., & Williams-Jones, B. (2009). Supervisor-student relations: Examining the spectrum of
conflicts of interest in bioscience laboratories. Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality
Assurance, 16(2), 106-126. doi: 10.1080/08989620902855033
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. (2009). Principles of conduct of clinical trials
communication of clinical trial results. from
http://www.phrma.org/sites/default/files/105/042009_clinical_trial_principles_final.pdf
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. (2009). Code on interactions with healthcare
professionals. Retrieved November 2011, from http://www.phrma.org/about/principles-
guidelines/code-interactions-healthcare-professionals
Sharp, R. R., Scott, A. L., Landy, D. C., & Kicklighter, L. A. (2008). Who is buying bioethics research?
American Journal of Bioethics, 8(8), 54-58. doi: 10.1080/15265160802317982
Steneck, N. H. (2007). Introduction to responsibled conduct of research Retrieved from
http://bioethics.od.nih.gov/researchethics.html
Tillman, R. (2013). Ethical embodiment and moral reasoning: A challenge to peter singer. Hypatia, 28(1),
18-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01242.x
Weatherall, D. (2003). Problems for biomedical research at the academia-industrial interface. Science &
Engineering Ethics, 9(1), 43-48.
Data Acquisition and Management
Benos, D. J., & Vollmer, S. H. (2010). Generalizing on best practices in image processing: A model for
promoting research integrity. Science & Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 669-673. doi:
10.1007/s11948-010-9226-2
Blumenthal, D. M., Campbell, E. G., Gokhale, M., Yucel, R., Clarridge, B., Hilgartner, S., & Holtzman,
N. A. (2006). Data withholding in genetics and the other life sciences: Prevalences and
predictors. Academic Medicine, 81(2), 137-145.
Campbell, E. G., Clarridge, B. R., Gokhale, M., Birenbaum, L., Hilgartner, S., Holtzman, N. A., &
Blumenthal, D. (2002). Data withholding in academic genetics. JAMA: Journal of the American
Medical Association, 287(4), 473.
Council on Governmental Relations. (2006). Access to and retention of research data rights and
responsibilities: Council on Governmental Relations.
Eiseman, E., Bloom, G., Brower, J., Clancy, N., & Olmstead, S. (2003). Case studies of existing tissue
repositories: "Best practices for a biospecimen resource for the genomic and proteomic era".
http://biospecimens.cancer.gov/global/pdfs/RAND_REPORT.pdf
Erard, R. E. (2004). Release of test data under the 2002 ethics code and the hipaa privacy rule: A raw deal
or just a half-baked idea? Journal of personality assessment, 82(1), 23-30.
Ethics CORE Digital Library. (2013). from National Center for Professional and Research Ethics
(NCPRE). http://nationalethicscenter.org/
Executive Office of The President Office of Management and Budget USA. (2003). Office of
management and budget guidance for grants and agreements with institutions of higher
education, hospitals, and other non-profit organizations,. Executive Office of The President
Office of Management and Budget, United States of America, Retrieved from
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a110/.
Geller, L. (2010). Data management in academic settings: An intellectual property perspective. Science &
Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 769-775. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9240-4
Giffels, J. (2010). Sharing data is a shared responsibility. Science & Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 801-803.
doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9230-6
Giffels, J., Vollmer, S. H., & Bird, S. J. (2010). Editors' overview: Topics in the responsible management
of research data (Vol. 16, pp. 631-637).
Gunsalus, C. K. (2010). Best practices in communicating best practices. Science & Engineering Ethics,
16(4), 763-767. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9227-1
Horner, J., & Minifie, F. D. (2011). Research ethics ii: Mentoring, collaboration, peer review, and data
management and ownership,. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 54(1), 330-345.
International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER) (Producer). (2012).
I.S.B.E.R. Best practice,. Retrieved from
http://www.isber.org/bp/documents/ISBERBestPractices3rdedition.pdf
Joshi, M., & Krag, S. S. (2010). Issues in data management. Science & Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 743-
748. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9223-5
National Institutes of Health. (2003). N.I.H. Data sharing policy,. Retrieved May 1, 2013, from
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/
Pascal, C. B. (2006). Managing data for integrity: Policies and procedures for ensuring the accuracy and
quality of the data in the laboratory. Science & Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 23-39.
Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
Shamoo, A. E., & Resnick, D. B. (2009). Responsible conduct of research (Second ed.). New York, New
York: Oxford University Press.
US Food and Drug Administration. (2012). Inspections, compliance enforcement. from
http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/ComplianceManuals/ComplianceProgramManual/ucm255614.htm
US General Services Administration. (2005). Federal acquisition regulation (far),. Retrieved from
http://www.acquisition.gov/far/reissue/FARvol1ForPaperOnly.pdf.
Vaught, J. B., Caboux, E., & Hainaut, P. (2010). International efforts to develop biospecimen best
practices. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 19(4), 912-915. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-10-
0058
Vaught, J. B., Henderson, M. K., & Compton, C. C. (2012). Biospecimens and biorepositories: From
afterthought to science. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevention, 21(2), 253-255. doi:
10.1158/1055-9965.epi-11-1179
Vollmer, S. H., & Howard, G. (2010). Statistical power, the belmont report, and the ethics of clinical
trials. Science & Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 675-691. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9244-0
Mentors/Mentees
Anderson, M., Oju, E., & Falkner, T. R. (2001). Help from faculty: Findings from the acadia institute
graduate education study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(4), 487-503. doi: 10.1007/s11948-
001-0006-x
Association for Women in Science. (2013). from http://www.awis.org/
Bird, S. J. (2001). Mentors, advisors and supervisors: Their role in teaching responsible research conduct.
Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(4), 455-468. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0002-1
Bird, S. J., & Sprague, R. L. (2001). Editorial introduction: Mentoring and the responsible conduct of
research: Reflections and future. Science and Engineering Ethics 7, 451-453.
Bridglall, B. L., & Gordon, E. W. (2004). The nurturance of african american scientific talent. The
Journal of African American History, 89(4), pp. 331-347.
Brown, M. C., II, Davis, G. L., & McClendon, S. A. (1999). Mentoring graduate students of color: Myths,
models, and modes. Peabody Journal of Education, 74(2), 105-118. doi: 10.2307/1493079
Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy (2000). Enhancing the postdoctoral experience for
scientists and engineers: A guide for postdoctoral scholars, advisers, institutions, funding
organizations, and disciplinary societies: The National Academies Press.
Committee on Scientific Conduct and Ethics, N. I. H. (2008). A guide to training and mentoring.
Intramural Research Sourcebook: Intramural Research, National Institutes of Health. Retrieved
from http://sourcebook.od.nih.gov/ethic-conduct/Training-Mentoring-10-08.pdf.
Committee on the Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences. Institute of Medicine (Ed.).
(1989). The responsible conduct of research in the health sciences. Washington, D.C.: National
Academy Press.
Dean, D. J. (2011). Getting the most out of your mentoring relationships: A handbook for women in stem.
Virginia: University of Richmond.
Elliott, D., & Stern, J. E. (Eds.). (1997). Research ethics: A reader. One Court Street, Lebanon, NH:
University Press of New England.
Emory University School of Medicine. Retrieved May 2013, 2013, from http://med.emory.edu/
Faden, R. R., Klag, M. J., Kass, N. E., & Krag, S. S. (2002). On the importance of research ethics and
mentoring. American Journal of Bioethics, 2(4), 50-51. doi: 10.1162/152651602320957565
Fischer, B. A., & Zigmond, M. J. (2001). Promoting responsible conduct in research through “survival
skills” workshops: Some mentoring is best done in a crowd. Science and Engineering Ethics,
7(4), 563-587. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0014-x
Frankel, M. S., & Bird, S. J. (2003). Introduction the role of scientific societies in promoting research
integrity. Science & Engineering Ethics, 9(2), 139-140.
Frugoli, J. A. (2001). Commentary on ‘mentors, advisors and supervisors: Their role in teaching
responsible research conduct’: It really does take a village. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(4),
469-470. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0003-0
Frugoli, J. A., Etgen, A. M., & Kuhar, M. (2010). Developing and communicating responsible data
management policies to trainees and colleagues. Science & Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 753-762.
doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9219-1
Gunsalus, C. K. (2001). How many degrees of separation? Preparation, proximity and professionalism.
Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(4), 505-506. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0007-9
Horner, J., & Minifie, F. D. (2011). Research ethics ii: Mentoring, collaboration, peer review, and data
management and ownership. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 54(1), S330-
S345. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0264)
Johnson, W. B. (2002). The intentional mentor: Strategies and guidelines for the practice of mentoring.
Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 33(1), 88.
Johnson, W. B. (2007). Transformational supervision: When supervisors mentor. Professional
Psychology: Research & Practice, 38(3), 259-267. doi: 10.1037/0735.7028.38.3.259
Kaslow, N. J., & Mascaro, N. A. (2007). Mentoring interns and postdoctoral residents in academic health
sciences center. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 14(3), 191-196. doi:
10.1007/s10880-007-9070-y
Kligyte, V., Marcy, R., Sevier, S., Godfrey, E., & Mumford, M. (2008). A qualitative approach to
responsible conduct of research (rcr) training development: Identification of metacognitive
strategies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(1), 33-39.
Louis, K. S., Holdsworth, J. M., Anderson, M. S., & Campbell, E. G. (2008). Everyday ethics in research:
Translating authorship guidelines into practice in the bench sciences. Journal of Higher
Education, 79(1), 88-112.
MacDonald, C., & Williams-Jones, B. (2009). Supervisor-student relations: Examining the spectrum of
conflicts of interest in bioscience laboratories. Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality
Assurance, 16(2), 106-126. doi: 10.1080/08989620902855033
MacDougall, M., & Riley, S. C. (2010). Initiating undergraduate medical students into communities of
research practise: What do supervisors recommend? BMC Med Educ, 10, 83.
Marra, R. M., & Pangborn, R. N. (2001). Mentoring in the technical disciplines: Fostering a broader view
of education, career, and culture in and beyond the workplace. New Directions for Teaching and
Learning, 2001(85), 35-42. doi: 10.1002/tl.4
Mertz, N. T. (2004). What's a mentor, anyway? Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(4), 541-560.
doi: 10.1177/0013161X04267110
National Institutes of Health Alcohol Drug and Mental Health Administration. (1989). Requirement for
programs on the responsible conduct of research in national research service award institutional
training programs,” nih guide for grants and contracts. Retrieved from
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/historical/1989_12_22_Vol_18_No_45.pdf.
National Postdoctoral Association. (2009). N.S.F. Mentoring requirement postdoctoral researcher mentor
plan. from http://www.nationalpostdoc.org/publications/mentoring-plans/223-nsf-mentoring-
requirement; http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf09_29/gpg_2.jsp#IIC2j
National Science Foundation. (2002). Integrative graduate education and research traineeship (igert)
program. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation Retrieved from
http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02145/nsf02145.pdf.
Oglensky, B. D. (2008). The ambivalent dynamics of loyalty in mentorship. Human Relations, 61(3),
419-448.
Robinson, L. R. (2005). Research culture, environment, and infrastructure. American Journal of Physical
Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84(12), 980-987. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000187853.79717.41
Roland, M.-C. (2007). Who is responsible? EMBO reports, 8(8), 706-711. doi:
doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401035
Rose, G., Rukstalis, Margaet & Schukit, Marc. (2005). Informal mentoring between faculty and medical
students. Academic Medicine, 80(4), 344-348.
Shamoo, A. E., & Resnick, D. B. (2009). Responsible conduct of research (Second ed.). New York, New
York: Oxford University Press.
Steneck, N. H. (2007). Introduction to responsibled conduct of research Retrieved from
http://bioethics.od.nih.gov/researchethics.html
Swazey, J. P. (2001). Graduate students and mentors: The need for divine intervention. Science and
Engineering Ethics, 7(4), 483-485. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0005-y
Tsui, L. (2007). Effective strategies to increase diversity in stem fields: A review of the research literature
(Vol. 76, pp. 555-581): Howard University School of Education. 2900 Van Ness Street NW,
Washington, DC 20008.
Weil, V. (2001). Mentoring: Some ethical considerations. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(4).
Weil, V., & Arzbaecher, R. (2001). Mentoring: Some ethical considerations,. In E. D. Deni Elliott & P.
Judy E. Stern (Eds.), Research ethics: A reader (pp. 471-482): Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Wessel, C. B., Tannery, N. H., & Epstein, B. A. (2010). Evaluation of a self-paced learning module to
teach responsible literature searching for research. J Med Libr Assoc, 98(1), 82-85.
Wright, D. E., Titus L, S., & Cornelison B, J. (2008). Mentoring and research misconduct: An analysis of
research mentoring in closed ori cases. Science & Engineering Ethics, 14(3), 323-336. doi:
10.1007/s11948-008-9074-5
Zigmond, M. J. (2003). Implementing ethics in the professions: Preparing guidelines on scientific
communication for the society for neuroscience. Science & Engineering Ethics, 9(2), 191-200.
Collaboration in Scientific Research
Aulakh, P. S., Cavusgil, S. T., & Sarkar, M. B. (1998). Compensation in international licensing
agreements. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(2), 409-419.
Baldwin, R. G., & Autin, A. E. (1995). Toward greater understanding of faculty research collaboration.
Review of Higher Education, 19(1), 45-70.
Beach, D. (1996). The responsible conduct of research. Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany,V.C.H.
Publishers Inc.,New York, NY(USA).
Beddoes, K., Jesiek, B. K., & Borrego, M. (2011). Fostering international engineering education research
collaborations: On the need to think beyond the workshop format. Australasian Journal of
Engineering Education, 17(2), 39-54.
Bird, S. J., & Sprague, R. L. (2001). Editorial introduction: Mentoring and the responsible conduct of
research: Reflections and future. Science and Engineering Ethics 7, 451-453.
Bok, D. (1994). The commercialized university,. In N. Bowie (Ed.), University partnerships: An
assessment (pp. 116-122). Lanham, MD: Roman and Littlefield.
Bok, D. (2004). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education.
Borrego, M., & Newswander, L. K. (2008). Characteristics of successful cross-disciplinary engineering
education collaborations. Journal of engineering education [1069-4730], 97(2), 123 -134.
Carrier, M. (2010). Research under pressure: Methodological features of commercialized science. In H.
Radder (Ed.), The commodification of academic research (pp. 158-186). Pittsburg, PA:
Univeristy of Pittsburg Press.
Circular a-21 revised 05/10/04,. (2013). Washington, D.C.: Office of Management and Budget,
Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a021_2004/.
Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational
boundaries. Social Studies of Science (Sage Publications, Ltd.), 35(5), 703-722. doi:
10.1177/0306312705055535
Elliott, D., & Stern, J. E. (Eds.). (1997). Research ethics: A reader. One Court Street, Lebanon, NH:
University Press of New England.
Frankel, M. S., & Bird, S. J. (2003). Introduction the role of scientific societies in promoting research
integrity. Science & Engineering Ethics, 9(2), 139-140.
Goran, M. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level.
Research Policy, 29(1), 31-40. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00031-1
Gray, D. O. (2011). Cross-sector research collaboration in the USA: A national innovation system
perspective. Science & Public Policy (SPP), 38(2), 123-133. doi:
10.3152/030234211X12960315267417
Horner, J., & Minifie, F. D. (2011). Research ethics ii: Mentoring, collaboration, peer review, and data
management and ownership,. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 54(1), 330-345.
Horner, J., & Minifie, F. D. (2011). Research ethics iii: Publication practices and authorship, conflicts of
interest, and research misconduct. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 54(1),
S346-S362. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0263)
Kleinman, D. L. (2011). The commercialization of academic culture and the future of the university. In H.
Radder (Ed.), The commodfication of academic research (pp. 24). Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of
Pittsburgh Press.
Kligyte, V., Marcy, R., Sevier, S., Godfrey, E., & Mumford, M. (2008). A qualitative approach to
responsible conduct of research (rcr) training development: Identification of metacognitive
strategies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(1), 33-39.
Louis, K. S., Holdsworth, J. M., Anderson, M. S., & Campbell, E. G. (2008). Everyday ethics in research:
Translating authorship guidelines into practice in the bench sciences. Journal of Higher
Education, 79(1), 88-112.
Macrina, F. L. (2007). Scientific societies and promotion of the responsible conduct of research: Codes,
policies, and education. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 865-869. doi:
10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7e58
Mattessich, P. (2001). Collaboration: What makes it work. A review of research literature on factors
influencing successful collaboration. In B.R and Wilder Research Center (Ed.). St Paul, MN:
Wilder Foundation.
Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level,.
Research Policy, 29(1), 31-40.
Mills, J., Gill, J., Franzway, S., & Sharp, R. (2009). “Sustaining and enjoying a multidisciplinary,
multidepartment, multicampus research collaboration on women in engineering”. Paper
presented at the ASEE Annual Conference,.
National Academy of Sciences. (2011). Rising above the gathering storm: Revisited: Rapidly approaching
category 5 USA Science and Public Policy, . Washington, D.C.
National Institutes of Health: Office of Technology Transfer. Ott science ideas breakthroughs,. US
Department Health and Human Services Retrieved from
http://www.ott.nih.gov/forms_model_agreements/forms_model_agreements.aspx :
http://www.ott.nih.gov/pdfs/UBMTA_Master.pdf.
National Science Board (NSB). (2010). Science and engineering indicators. Washington, D.C., NSB:
National Science Board.
National Science Foundation. (2009). Survey of state research and development expenditures, srs (nsf 10-
301). Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
Radder, H. (Ed.). (2010). The commodification of academic research. Pittsburg PA.: University of
Pittsburg Press.
Raza, M. (2005). Collaborative healthcare research: Some ethical considerations. Science & Engineering
Ethics, 11(2), 177-186.
Robinson, L. R. (2005). Research culture, environment, and infrastructure. American Journal of Physical
Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84(12), 980-987. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000187853.79717.41
Ross, L. (2010). The challenges of collaboration for academic and community partners in a research
partnership: Points to consider. Journal of empirical research on human research ethics, 5(1), 19-
32. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.1.19
Schrag, B., Ferrell, G., Weil, V., & Fiedler, T. J. (2003). Barking up the wrong tree? Industry funding of
academic research. Science & Engineering Ethics, 9(4), 569-582.
Sterckx, S. (2011). Patenting and licensing of university research: Promoting innovation or undermining
academic values? Science & Engineering Ethics, 17(1), 45-64. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9168-8
Turpin, T., & Fernández-Esquinas, M. (2011). Introduction to special issue: The policy rationale for
cross-sector research collaboration and contemporary consequences. Science & Public Policy
(SPP), 38(2), 82-86. doi: 10.3152/030234211X12924093660633
Zigmond, M. J. (2003). Implementing ethics in the professions: Preparing guidelines on scientific
communication for the society for neuroscience. Science & Engineering Ethics, 9(2), 191-200.
Authorship and Publication
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2013). General information for authors.
Retrieved May 28, 2013, from
http://www.sciencemag.org/site/feature/contribinfo/prep/gen_info.xhtml
American Chemical Society. (2012). Ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research. Retrieved
May 28, 2013, from http://pubs.acs.org/userimages/ContentEditor/1218054468605/ethics.pdf
American Society for Microbiology. (2013). April 10, 2000 - promoting research integrity at the american
society for microbiology. Retrieved May 28, 2013, from
http://www.asm.org/index.php/documents/statements-and-testimony?id=2320
American Society of Civil Engineers. (2013). Obligations of authors. from
http://www.asce.org/Content.aspx?id=29713
American Society of Mechanical Engineers. (2013). Ethics module.Pub - 28207.Pdf. Retrieved May 28,
2013, from http://files.asme.org/asmeorg/NewsPublicPolicy/Newsletters/METoday/articles/
28207.pdf
Borenstein, J. (2011). Responsible authorship in engineering fields: An overview of current ethical
challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(2), 355-364.
Charles, L., & Reidenbach, F. (2011). Publication planners and medical writers: A natural alliance.
AMWA Journal: American Medical Writers Association Journal, 26(1), 8-11.
Committee on Publication Ethics: COPE. (2013). Promoting integrity in research publication. Retrieved
May 28, 2013, from http://publicationethics.org/
Engineers, I. E. a. E. (2013). Ieee - u.S. International traffic in arms regulation (itar). from
http://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/compliance/regulatory/itar.html
Farthing, M. M., J. G. (2006). Authors and publication practices. Science & Engineering Ethics, 12(1),
41-52.
Gotzsche, P. C., Kassirer, J. P., Woolley, K. L., Wager, E., Jacobs, A., Gertel, A., & Hamilton, C. (2009).
What should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature? PLoS Medicine, 6(2), 122-
125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000023
International Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (2007). I.E.E.E. (a). Principles of scholarly
publishing,. from http://www.ieee.org/documents/IEEE_Publishing_Principles.pdf
International Electrical and Electronics Engineers (b). (2013). Office of foreign access control (o.F.A.C.)
background,. Retrieved June 13, 2013, from
http://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/compliance/regulatory/ofac/background.html
International Electrical and Electronics Engineers (c). U.S. International traffic in arms regulation. from
http://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/compliance/regulatory/itar.html
International Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). (2013). International electrical and electronics
engineers (ieee) code of ethics. Retrieved April 23, 2013, from
http:www.ieee.org/portal/pages/iportals/aboutus/ethics/code.html
Iverson, M., Frankel, M. S., & Siang, S. (2003). Scientific societies and research integrity: What are they
doing and how well are they doing it? Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(2), 141-158. doi:
10.1007/s11948-003-0002-4
Macrina, F. (2011). Teaching authorship and publication practices in the biomedical and life sciences.
Science & Engineering Ethics, 17(2), 341-354. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9275-1
Macrina, F. L. (1995). Scientific integrity: An introductory text with cases. New York: American Society
of Microbiology, ASM Press.
Macrina, F. L. (2007). Scientific societies and promotion of the responsible conduct of research: Codes,
policies, and education. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 865-869. doi:
10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7e58
Meadows, A. J. (1998). Communicating research. San Diego, CA.: Academic Press.
National Academy of Sciences. (2013). Information for authors. Procceedings of the national academy of
sciences (USA),. from http://www.pnas.org/site/authors/index.xhtml
Resnik, D. B. (2011). Criteria for authorship in bioethics,. American Journal of Bioethics, 11(10), 17-21.
Resnik, D. B., & Master, Z. (2011). Authorship policies of bioethics journals. Journal of medical ethics,
37(7), 424-428.
Ross, J. S., Gross, C. P., & Krumholz, H. M. (2012). Promoting transparency in pharmaceutical industry-
sponsored research. American Journal of Public Health, 102(1), 72-80. doi:
10.2105/AJPH.2011.300187
Wager, E., Field, E. A., & Grossman, L. (2003). Good publication practice for pharmaceutical companies.
Current medical research and opinion, 19(3), 149-154.
Washburn, J. J. (2008). Encouraging research collaboration through ethical and fair authorship: A model
policy. Ethics & Behavior, 18(1), 44-58. doi: 10.1080/10508420701712917