genteknologi rasmus hartmann-petersen imb, august krogh, protein science section, room 637, 6th...
TRANSCRIPT
Genteknologi
Rasmus Hartmann-Petersen
IMB, August Krogh,Protein Science Section,Room 637, 6th floorPhone: 35 32 15 02E-mail: [email protected]
26S proteasome
Bachelor, Master’s & PhDstudent positions available
The Protein Science Section at the Institute of Molecular Biology, August Krogh Building
1 Professor4 Associate Professors5 Laboratory Technicians4 Post Docs7 PhD students5 Master’s Students
People from: Denmark, Germany, Sweden, USA, Portugal, Switzerland, Russia
Robert F. WeaverMolecular Biology, 3rd edition
Chapter 17
The Mechanism of Translation 1- Initiation
Online Translation Animation
http://www.brookscole.com/chemistry_d/templates/student_resources/shared_resources/animations/protein_synthesis/protein_synthesis.html
Concentrationof protein X Translation Degradation
Regulation of intracellularprotein levels
Transcription
Modification
Ex:PhosphorylationGlycosylationUbiquitinylationSumoylationEtc...
1981 2003
Reg
ulat
ion
(%)
Translation
Transcription
Degradation
Regulation of protein levels
100
Prokaryotes
Fig. 17.2
Fig. 17.8
The first amino acid in prokaryotic proteins is not Met, but fMet.
-Why?
-And what about eukaryotes?
50S
30S
70S ribosome(holo complex)
Peptidyl transferase activity (Chap 18)
mRNA binding (Chap 17)
Are intact 70S ribosomes stable
particles?
50S
30S
70S ribosome(holo complex)
50S + 30S
Dissociated subparticles
Fig. 17.3
Sucrose/Glycerol/CsClGradient Density Ultracentrifugation
"Light medium"C, N12 14
"Heavy medium"C, N13 15
E. coli cultured in
The Meselson & Stahl sedimentation assay
Meselson & Stahl
"Light medium"C, N12 14
"Heavy medium"C, N13 15
E. coli cultured in
Meselson sedimentation assay
After centrifugation
30S50S70S
38S
86S61S
Fig. 17.4
Fig. 17.5
← Dissociation
← No dissociation
← Negative control
Fig. 17.7
Ready for interaction with:IF2, mRNA & tRNA
50S
30S
70S ribosome(holo complex)
Peptidyl transferase activity
mRNA binding, when dissociatedfrom 50S subcomplex
Recognises Shine-Dalgarno sequence(AGGAGGU)
(Not curriculum)
Shine-Dalgarno is poorly conserved, but 3+ bases is enough for recognition
Fig. 17.7
Ready for interaction with:IF2, mRNA & tRNA
Fig. 17.13
IF2
IF1,3
IF2 is a ribosome dependent GTPase
Fig. 17.15
Eukaryotes
Eukaryotes don’t contain Shine-Dalgarno sequences- so how do eukaryotic ribosomes recognize mRNA?
Fig. 17.16
No Shine-Dalgarno sequence, eukaryotic ribosomesrecognise 5’caps instead
Scanning model
Kozak Sequence
NN NNAUGGAG
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 +1 +2 +3 +4
Marilyn Kozak
Site Directed Mutagenesis
Fig. 5.25
Fig. 17.17
Fig. 17.18
Kozak1 Kozak2 proinsulinOOF
Fig. 17.19
Only the first Kozak sequence is efficiently utilised
Fig. 17.21
Overexpressed
Strain background (his4-)
Thomas Donahue
How does the ribosome deal with
melting secondary mRNA structures?
Fig. 17.20
+
+
-
-Translation
Fig. 17.26
Fig. 17.22
GAP
GEF (eIF2B)
eIF2-GDP
GTP
GDP
G-protein: GTPase, GTP=active, GDP=inactive (eIF2)GAP: GTPase activating protein (eIF5) Inactivates G-proteinGEF: GTP exchange factor (eIF2B) Activates G-protein
eIF2-GTP
Gef
Ras MAPK pathway
Isolation of the CAP binding protein (CBP)
+A B A BBinding
X-linking
A B
A
B
AB
Chemical Cross-linking and Electrophoresis
Fig. 17.23
M7-GDPsensitive
GDPsensitive
Fig. 17.24
Capped Uncapped
w. CBP
w/o CBP
Luciferase
Luciferase
AAAAAALuciferase
AAAAAALuciferase
Effect of 5’ caps and polyA on mRNA stability and translatability?
Pulse chase Luciferase
5’-CAP 3’-polyA mRNA T½ (min) Luciferase Activity (U/mg)
- - 31 2941
- + 44 4480
+ - 53 62595
+ + 100 1331917
Table 15.1
5’ caps and polyA tails increase stability and translatability of mRNA
Synergy
Fig. 17.27
IRES (eukaryoticShine-Dalgarno)
Only polyA
CAP and polyA
Only CAP
pIRES-GFP for easy expression & transfection control
Isolation of scanning promoting factors
Fig. 17.31
Toeprint:
Fig. 17.32
Most translational regulation occurs
at the initiation step
Initiation is the rate limiting step in translation
Regulation before elongation saves energy
Synthesis of hemoglobin
Heme abundance:
Heme starvation:
DNA
Transcription Translation
mRNA globin hemoglobin
Hemeincorporation
DNA
Transcription Translation
mRNA globin hemoglobin
Hemeincorporation
Fig. 17.37a
Fig. 17.37b
Will not dissociate
Inhibits translation of most mRNAs, but stimulatesthe translation of ATF4 mRNA
Robert F. WeaverMolecular Biology, 3rd edition
Chapters 18 & 19
The Mechanism of Translation 2-Elongation & Termination
Ribosomes & Transfer RNA
Transcription and translation are coupled in prokaryotes
-No nucleous, i.e. ribosomes and RNA polymerase in same compartment
-No introns, i.e. primary transcript = mature mRNA
Fig. 19.22
DNA
RNA
Nascent chain(protein) ?
5’
Ribosome
5’
Transcription and translation are two separateprocesses in eukaryotes
-Nucleous, need for mRNA transport
-Introns, need for mRNA maturation (splicing)
Fig. 19.21
5’3’
Polysomes
40S 60S 80S
polysome
ATG AAAAAAA
Nascent protein
mRNA
++ EDTA
+ Mg2+
40S
60S
Abs
orb
ance
(2
54 n
m)
SedimentationTop Bottom
LDH
act
ivity
(%
)
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00+EDTA
anti-Nac1
80S
60S40S
Polysomes
Abs
orb
ance
(2
54 n
m)
SedimentationTop Bottom
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
LDH
act
ivity
(%
)
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
-EDTA
anti-Nac1
Ribosome structure
Fig. 19.4
30S50S
Anti-codon armof tRNA
Exit channel
Fig. 19.1
AP
E
A: Aminoacyl (Acceptor)P: PeptidylE: Exit
Fig. 19.1
tRNA structure
Fig. 19.24
Poor primary structure similarities, but similar clover leaf secodnary structure
Fits withCUU(leucine)
Fig. 19.26
Tertiary tRNA structure
The genetic code
Fig. 18.6
Note: 3rd base degeneracy
Fig. 18.7
Non Watson-Crick (wobble) base pairing
Fig. 18.8
Phe Leu
The genetic code is not a frozen accident
Fig. 18.6
Note: 3rd base degeneracy
Note: Double safety
Note: Similarity safty
Fig. 18.9