geoff hill - how remote toilets work (or fail to)

43
HOW REMOTE TOILETS WORK (OR FAIL TO) And what they should really be doing Geoff Hill, PhD Sustainable Summits Conference Golden, CO

Upload: sustainable-summits-initiative

Post on 14-Apr-2017

76 views

Category:

Environment


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

HOW REMOTE TOILETS WORK (OR FAIL TO)And what they should really be doing

Geoff Hill, PhDSustainable Summits Conference Golden, CO

Waterless Toilet Overview Comparison

Elbow Lake, ABCampground, open 3 months per yearUse/yr: 50002 stall - 2 Composting ToiletsAnnual O&M cost: $2660O&M Freq: weeklyCost per use: $0.53OSHA Exposure Events/yr: 33Material removal: every year (dump)

Faverges, FranceRoad Side, open 12 months per year

Use/yr: 200001 Stall – Urine Diverting + Vermicomposting

Annual O&M cost: $700O&M Freq: yearly

Cost per use: $0.035OSHA Exposure Events/yr: 3

Material Removal: every 10-20 years (dump)

Outline• Waste Paradigm• Compost – what it actually is• Remote Site Challenges• Types, Objectives, Evaluation of Remote Toilets• Human Waste Composition & Production• Source Separation• Urine Diversion• Performance of Urine Diversion vermicomposting toilets• Future Direction

Flush Toilet• Homes in the Western world

• Water (cheap / limitless)• Power (cheap / limitless)• Onsite labor (cheap, home owner)• Nutrients needs (garden, lawn)• We FLUSH it away

• Waste Management Paradigm• Toilet #1 invention for human health• Water as vehicle – everything removed at WWTP

Compost from biosolids in USA• Biosolids extracted from WWTP – burned, land applied, or

composted• Public operations are held to EPA 503 rules, thermophilic

engineered process for degrading and sanitizing waste• 5 turns in 15 days, >55C, fecal coliform testing to assure process,

• Very rigorous and challenging• Done at centralized facilities

• Still very difficult to make profitable and worthwhile

Remote sites• No power / solar power• No water • Limited / expensive labor• Cold• No use for nutrients or organic

matter

Types of Toilets at Remote Sites• Pit

• Dig hole (6-10’ deep), fill up, cap, dig another.• Composting

• Buy unit, users add wood, ‘service’ weekly, blackwater leaches, dump solids onsite yearly (or pack-out)

• Vault (concrete or plastic barrel)• Buy precast unit, pump yearly, remove to WWTP

• Incinerating (very few – private)• Urine Diverting Vermicomposting (France)

• Not covering dispersed• Pack-out• Cat hole

Objective of These Toilets• Pit

• Lowest cost regardless of human health & environment• Composting

• Make compost, regardless of O&M cost & safety• Vault (concrete or plastic barrel)

• Least environmental impact, safety, O&M cost• UDVCT

• Lowest life cycle cost O&M, acceptable environmental impact, and high health & safety standard

Pit Toilet In Ground Water: World Heritage Site, BC

Pits• Pits can be found years later – no

decay • Many toilets dug into ground water• With 1m unsaturated soil

• Viral pathogens can travel 3000m• Hepatitis A, Polio, Astrovirus, Calcivirus,

Rotavirus, Norwalk, Coxsackievirus, Echovirus

Sources:WHO Funded: “Guidelines for Assessing the Risk to Groundwater from On-Site Sanitation”, British Geological SurveyMoore, C., 2010. Institute of Environmental Science and Research (N.Z.) Staff. Guidelines for separation distances based on virus transport between on-site domestic wastewater systems and wells. ESR Communicable Disease Centre, Porirua, New Zealand.

Pits• Treatment paradigm

• Not effective• Dumps in our parks?

• Waste Management Paradigm• Not safe• Virus travel very far• Very hard to detect (few labs culture viruses)

• NPS – should all be replaced• With…..

Composting toilets• Don’t compost shit at home…

• Why compost shit in the woods?

• Tried to failure dozens – hundreds of times

Composting Toilet Photo Tour

Composting toilets (CTs): a misnomer• PhD + 5 peer review publications

• 4 brands, 12 sites, 16 chambers, 100+ samples

• 0/16 chambers pass NSF Standard 41• 0/16 processes meet EPA 503 regulations

• None heat up more than 10C above ambient• 0/100 samples meet definition of compost

• Stability, maturity, smell• Raw fecal matter no different from CT end-

product (E.coli, volatile solids, stability)• All continuous flow

• Effective residence time: 1-2 days

6yr old ‘compost’

2 outcomes• Ammonification toilet

• Primarily urine – ammonia & pH escalate – inhibits all life• Not effective enough to reliably sanitize• Many campgrounds and trailheads

• Pathogen brew pot• Primarily fecal matter• UBC CK Choi – Flagship of composting toilets, maintained by paid

personnel every day.• >100,000 E.coli in 5yr old material (E.coli breeding ground)

Composting Toilets as Waste Management (typical 3000 user site)• $2665/yr to maintain• 33 occupational exposure events / yr (face close to

fecal)• Effective?

Vault Toilets - Barrel• True waste management perspective• Terribly expensive and hazardous to operate• $0.30 to $1.00 per use• Requires an operator to change barrels

Human Waste Production / Composition

• Urine• 160-200ml per use• 80% of plant nutrients (NPK)• Zero heavy metals• Zero pathogens • Self sanitizing (storage)• Flows by gravity

• Fecal matter• 80-100g per use• 20% of plant nutrients• 100% of heavy metals• 100% of pathogens (106-8bacteria,

helminth, viral, protozoan)• Doesn’t flow

Source Separation• For maximum value & least cost ‘waste management’• Waste Management BMP• Lets apply to wilderness waste• Human waste = urine + fecal (2:1)

Urine Diversion Retrofits (2)• Ecovita 501 Privy• Clogged within a week of installation

Urine Diverting Vermicomposting (UDVCT)

• Ecosphere Technologies & Ecodomeo (France)• No bulking agent

UDVCT

End-Product Waste Management

Stable – Very Stable O&M costs/yr = $273

No odor Exposure events/yr = 3

<200 CFU/g E.coli Dry matter reduction = 40%

Lots of trash Emptied every 10-20 years

UDVCT vs CTUDVCT CT Comparison

O&M costs/yr = $273 $2665 10x

Exposure events/yr 3 33 10x

Dry matter reduction -40% +300% Almost 10x

Disposal Emptied every 10-20 years

Every 6mo – 2 yrs

5-20x

E.Coli <200CFU/g 104-106 CFU/g 100x lower

North American Implications• Step 1: divert urine

• Gravity manage to septic field 66% of daily mass• Step 2: don’t add bulking agent• Step 3: look and see what’s eating local horse manure

(naturally source separated) and put it into fecal matter & toilet paper

• Step 4: don’t touch the poo, leave it for as long as possible

• Step 5: budget a decadal line item for removal and disposal

Slugs in the Pacific Northwest

Step 1: Divert Urine (the hard step)• Behavior• Ecovita seat – private only• Mechanical (Toilet Tech Solutions)

Behind-the-Wall + Pedal Power Below-The-Floor + Door Power

TTS Below-the-Floor

Glacier Bay National Park, AK

TTS Behind-the-Wall

Glacier Bay National Park, AK

Neat and Cool, Squamish Smoke Bluffs, B.C.Sponsored by MEC, District of Squamish, andClimate action network.

$4000 plus or minus