geophysical monitoring of groundwater flow for mining and

28
Geophysical Monitoring of Groundwater Flow for Mining and Exploration Applications Graham Heinson School of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Mineral Exploration Through Cover Adelaide, Australia, Friday 27 th June

Upload: others

Post on 16-Oct-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Geophysical Monitoring of Groundwater Flow for Mining and Exploration ApplicationsGraham HeinsonSchool of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005,

Mineral Exploration Through CoverAdelaide, Australia, Friday 27th June

Porous Rock Aquifers

Fractured Rock Aquifers

2 mBedding Plane

Uplift

1 m

Plan View

Bedding planes

Fracture

s

Hydraulic Conductivity,Heterogeneity

?

Figure adapted from Love, A. and Cook, P. (1999). The importance of fractured rock aquifers. Dept of Primary Industries and Resources, South Australia Report Book 99/23.

Aperture SizeFluid flow varies with cube of aperture diameter

Electrical current flow is linearly proportional to aperture diameter

Figure adapted from Love, A. and Cook, P. (1999). The importance of fractured rock aquifers. Dept of Primary Industries and Resources, South Australia Report Book 99/23.

Groundwater Flow

Figure adapted from Love, A. and Cook, P. (1999). The importance of fractured rock aquifers. Dept of Primary Industries and Resources, South Australia Report Book 99/23.

Porous Media Pump well

Observation well

Pump wellObservation

well

Porous media: assume homogeneous drawdown

Plan view Cross Section

Water Table

Fractured Media Pump well

Observation well

Pump well Observation well

Drawdown

Fractured media: heterogeneous drawdown

Water Table

Figure adapted from Love, A. and Cook, P. (1999). The importance of fractured rock aquifers. Dept of Primary Industries and Resources, South Australia Report Book 99/23.

Fractured Rocks in the Eastern Mt Lofty Ranges: 20 sites; lithology and structural geology

20 km

Borehole-Surface Resistivity

30 m

30 m

Surface Potential Maps

Orientation of bar – strike

Arrow – dip

Length of bar – degree of anisotropy

20 sites completed along eastern Mount Lofty Ranges

20 sites are being undertaken in western Mount Lofty Ranges

Electrokinetic PotentialResistivity gives amount of fluid (porosity) but does not tell us how well fluid flows (hydraulic conductivity)Electrokinetics: naturally occurring voltages that occur due to fluid movement

Salinity (number of charged ions in solution)pH (absorption of ions on to rock)Zeta potential (natural electrical double layer across rock boundary)

Electrokinetic PotentialFracture

< 1 m

m

Immobile fluid

Immobile fluid

Mobile fluid

Movement of ions in solution is known as an advective current

Electric double

layer

Electrokinetic PotentialHigh salinity → high concentration of ions in solutions, high advective currentpH → polarity of fluid ions absorbed onto fractures, polarity of advective current

Low pH (typically acidic <7) → positive ions attracted, hence advective current has higher density of negative ionsHigh pH (typically alkaline >7) → negative ions attracted, hence advective current has higher density of positive ions

Zeta potential → natural electric double layer of rock materials

Advective electric current

Fracture

Convective current (return path)

Advective current (fluid path)

V ia

ic Rrock and fluid

Rfluid

PCPV ∇=∇ησεζ

=∇

H'CHg

V ∇=∇ησ

εζρ=∇

Helmholtz-Smoluchovsky Equation

Darcy’s Law

HKAQ

∇−=

∇V = Electric potential gradient (V/m)∇P = Pressure gradient (Pa/m)∇H = Hydraulic gradient (m/m)ε = dielectric constant (F/m)ζ = ζ (zeta) potential (V)η = Fluid viscosity (Pa s)σ = Fluid electrical conductivity (S/m)ρ = Fluid density (kg/m3)g = Specific gravity (m/s2)C = Streaming potential coefficient (V/Pa)C’ = Streaming potential coefficient (V/m)

Q = Flow (m3/s)A = Area (m2)K = Hydraulic conductivity (m/s)∇H = Hydraulic gradient (m/m)

Governing Equations

Salinity term

tank manometers

sample tube

electrodes

data-taker

computer

ΔH

ΔV

Electrokinetics in the lab

Determination of ζ and C’

ζ = - 40mV C = -1.8 mV/mfor σ = 1470 μS/m

Sample: Q1B(fine sandstone)

(Wendouree)

Streaming Potential for 5 different hydraulic heads (sample Q1B)

-6

-5.5

-5

-4.5

-4

-3.5

-3

14:12 14:15 14:18 14:21

Time

SP (m

V)

H 1

H 2

H 3

H 4H 5

Linear relationship:V=Cs*H + constant

y = -0.018x - 5.3209R2 = 0.9992

-5.4

-5

-4.6

-4.2

-3.8

-3.4

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0

H (cm)

V (m

V)

Electrokinetic Field Measurements

36 electrodes in radial pattern, 6 every 5 m along a line, and with six lines spaced 60°Potentials measured every 5 s at each electrode relative to a distant reference.Transient changes in potential surrounding the pumped well of up to 10 mV are observed over time-scales of a few seconds after turning the pump on, to tens of minutes when equilibrium flow is established

V

Pump

30 m

Reference electrode

Switch on pump

1

2

34

56

Max

imum

flo

w d

irect

ion

Min

imum

flo

w

dire

ctio

n

Switch on pump

Line 1 Line 2 Line 3 Line 4 Line 5 Line 6

Negative potential change: change in pH?

Max

imum

flo

w d

irect

ion

Min

imum

flo

w d

irect

ion

1

2

34

56

Switch on pump

Almost no change in potential: low yield, or deep flow?

Interpretation

Water table

Before pumping… No flow, no electrokinetic potential!

Water table

Start pumping

Fluid flow near surface →large convective current ic → large potential

iaic

Water table

Late times

Deep flow → small convective current ic →small potential

ia

ic

ConclusionDownhole resistivity can indicate amount of fluid (porosity), and fluid connection paths Electrokinetic methods detect flow (hydraulic conductivity) in fractured and porous mediaPumped wells surrounded by electrodes can map fluid flow as a fucntion of time…..but processes are poorly understood, particularly salinity, pH and zeta potential