geophysical survey logistical report · uj uj uj uj-* cv ci c^ ,cj] 3 lo d ^ l-1 ^ l k) ^•^ f...

$: Geophysical Survey Logistical Report · Uj Uj Uj Uj-* cv ci c^ ,cj] 3 lo d ^ L-1 ^ l K) ^•^ F 4' L 31)9 4(6 Jl l) j f 1 X)9 //' U CJ V-.'-IE B ^ l J vi f * * S S 8 \L45153 \ M D$
Quantec IP Inc. P.O Box 580, 101 King Street Porcupine, ON PON 1CO Phone (705)^35.2166 Fax (705) 235 2255

Geophysical Survey Logistical Report

Regarding the GRADIENT- REALSECTION TDIP/RESISTWITY SURVEY over the MARCHAUD PROPERTY, Michaud Twp., ON, on behalf of PENTLAND FIRTH VENTURES LTD, Porcupine, ON

GEOSCIEMCf-' A SSESSMENT 0:-f-Cc

7 W ^

* *

i|^;;:|i^|||li||ii^::i ijfrftmm i \ i f i l; i;11 :l i f;;

42A08NE0127 2.17716 MICHAUD 010

P190 PENTLAND FIRTH VENTURES LTD. Marchaud RSIP

1. INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................3

Z GENERAL SURVEY DETAILS..................................................................................................................^

2.1 LOCATION..................................................................................................................................^2.2 ACCESS....................................................................................................................................^2.3 SURVEY GRID.............................................................................................................................5

3. SURVEY WORK UNDERTAKEN..............................................................................................................^

3.1 GENERALITIES...........................................................................................................................^3.2 PERSONNEL...............................................................................................................................63.3 SPECIFICATIONS.........................................................................................................................^3.4 SURVEY COVERAGE....................................................................................................................73.5 INSTRUMENTATION.....................................................................................................................^3.6 PARAMETERS.............................................................................................................................83.7 MEASUREMENT ACCURACY AND REPEATABILITY ...........................................................................93.8 DATA PRESENTATION..................................................................................................................9

APPENDIX A: STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS APPENDIX B: THEORETICAL BASIS APPENDIX C: PRODUCTION SUMMARY APPENDIX D: INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS APPENDIX E: IP 6 DUMP FILE FORMAT APPENDIX F: LIST OF MAPS APPENDIX G: PLAN MAPS AND SECTIONS

Figure 1: General Survey Location of the Marchaud Project, Michaud Twp., ................................4Figure 2: Gradient Array Layout....................................................................................................7Table l: Reconnaissance Survey Coverage at Marchaud Property...............................................7Table II: Realsection (Detail) Survey Coverage .............................................................................8Table III: Decay Curve Sampling....................................................................................................9

42A08NE0127 2.17716 MICHAUD 01OC


1. INTRODUCTION

* QIP Project No:

* Project Name:

* Grid Name:

* General Location:

* Survey Period:

* Survey Type:

* Client:

* Client Address:

Client Representative:

Objectives:

P190

Marchaud Property

Michaud Twp.

Matheson, ON

June3RD to18TH , 1997

Time Domain Induced Polarization.

Pentland Firth Ventures Ltd.

Highway 101 East Hallnor Road PO Box 1690 South Porcupine, ON PON 1HO

Dean Crick

1. Exploration objectives. To determine IP/Resistivity signatures associated with sulphide mineralization and alteration, with related gold mineralization, to depths up to 600 meters, hosted in the Ludgate Shear, a splay of the Porcupine- Destor Fault Zone, for the purpose of drill targeting.

2. Geophysical objectives: To identify potential drill targets by measurement of their IP and Resistivity physical properties. The gradient and Realsection tech niques were chosen based on their high resolution and deep penetration char acteristics.

Report Type: Logistical

Quantec


2.1 LOCATION

* Country:

* Province:

* Township:

* Nearest Highway:

* Nearest Settlement:

* Grid Position:

. NTS Number:

Canada

Ontario

Michaud Twp., ON

Hwy101

Ramore, ON

centered on approx. 567,OOOmEy5,370,400mN

42A/8

Michaud Twp. Property

Fiaure 1: General Survey Location of the Marchaud Project. Michaud Twp..

PANGEA1.95 Million Tons 8 5,13 g.t (321,620 oz.)

NOTE:

K A REA DF WORK

PENTLAND FIRTH VENTURES LTD.Timmins ONTARIO

Key Map:LOCATION OF

1997 FIELD WORKGuibord - Michaud - Garrison Townships


2.2 ACCESS

. Base of Operations: Perry Lake Lodge (located on Hwy 101)

* Distance by Land to Property: 6km south of base of operations

* Mode of Access to Property: 4x4 truck

* Mode of Access to Lines: truck

2.3 SURVEY GRID

* Coordinate Reference System: Local survey grid (non UTM)

* Established:

* Line Direction:

* Line Separation:

* Station Interval:

* Claims Covered by Survey:

Prior to survey execution by Pentland Firth Ventures Ltd.

N0000E

50 meters

25 meters

L40916 L40919 L40920

L40915 L40914

L40917 L40918

T0

S

"s

viso p| p p•fN

V

J

l. Ir,

H

si &1 ft ^: 3 s

H)

!Pi OV

,ny

v

l^

i ^~1

VO'

Ul^I

N1

*0o

(4j'

o(O

OCK

K


3. SURVEY WORK UNDERTAKEN

3.1 GENERALITIES

* Survey Dates:

* Survey Period:

* Survey Days:

* Weather Days:

* Standby Days:

* Travel Days:

* Total km Surveyed:

3.2 PERSONNEL

* Supervisor:

* Project Manager:

* Field Assistants:

3.3 SPECIFICATIONS

* Array:

June3RD to18TH , 1997

16 days

12.5 days (read time)

.5

1.5 (cease work order by MMR)

1.5

24.6 km (incl. reconnaissance and detail)

Jeff Warne, South Porcupine, ON

Paul Cassidy, South Porcupine ON

Dashamir Belliu, Porcupine, ON Robin Ranger, South Porcupine, ON Chris Sawyer, Mississauga, ON

Multiple Gradient (see Figure 2)

* AB (Transmitter Dipole Separation):

1. Reconnaissance: 4000m

2. Detail follow-up: 1500-3000m

* MN (Receiver Dipole Separation): 25m

* Sampling Interval: 25m

* Line Interval: 1 00m

950246 j 1

\ l 950243 J

UTis'Âp

N i

'^ 950245 ^

i.j** m- tt Bs-"- -t*3l to ei \ '.i ' . i-* -2 B fc- '- .^1

CDN. Ill

L40912,t3aa

/i 3-MM

L4O913——————————— 1

L45151Ml B M WO* S V *2K* B B I'.T?*]

521412

LEGENL

-^-- 1997

LDT 9

CDN, II

p- — — — —

950244 "- 4 40C

U, *îjj Uj Uj "*J !*J ^J ^ ^^ - Ca

-^ û ^Xj^*.^*) t*i ^ ^ |DU\ ^ Ch ^QV^ 0^ Os ^ V^

V V

;: 140915

e -- — — ~ —

' ' L4O9v -'

li t -J-, 'f, - \ \ - tl —————— mr— -

1 4

--

N

1

-'.f

H

.--i '.'J

lu Vij

V) V)u\ o\

'-'•~:

HilllllrtL45152

l

PENTL,

t a w?* a B *.-ii* a a P' Jan t B tvâ mm*?-*

521415

lPNE CUTTING IRSIP SURVEY CDVEJ?A(i------- — - — --^j--

n n

l(

lu

Vi

M

:E

950242

Uj Uj Uj Uj-*cv ci c^ ,cj] 3 lo d ^

L-

1

^

l

K)

^•^F

4'

L

31

)9

4(

6

Jl l) j

f

1 X

)9

//' U

CJ

V-

.'-

IE

B

^

l

J

vi

f * * S S 8

\L45153

\

M D \

/52

LDT 8 v-5?vol

1 ^

1416

if a VD RQAB

NORTH TD 1 HW Y. ID:

950222 1 1

1

TL

l

uj

| 950223fr44 fc-^3Bi a* s r-ir^s a n E5S;-,aa 'fl ESSSM * m ra

S PENTLANDi

^ ffL JSOav (Si) 387101V

V.: L40919l J l

i •1-^L^---—^ — -

'; L40920-BB-

Vi *-u

^ X IT) Ci ^j f

L451 54

521421 LDT 7 i

PENTLAND FIRTH VENTURES LTD.Tmnms DNTAR1D

GARRISON CREEK J.V.

Location of 1997 Linecutting ft Survey

Michaud Township

AHR.

NUT Nff

DVO. MOi UiDUNE

WTD 1MTS) IfROJCCn SCPT. 30/97 j j

0 Sfl LOO 130 EOOM

1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1


GRADIENT ARRAY

V//MGRADIENT ARRAY COVERAGE AREA

Figure 2: Gradient Array Layout

3.4 SURVEY COVERAGE

Reconnaissance:

Detail l Follow-up:

Total km Surveyed:

Total Gradient AB Blocks:

9.5km (see Table l)

15.1km (see Table 11)

24.6km

* Approximate Anal Coverage: 0 .8 km2

* Reconnaissance Coverage (AB = 4000m)

LINE9150E9250E9350E9450E9550E9650E9750E9850E9950E10050E

SOUTHERN EXTENT3250N3300N3300N3300N3300N3250N3250N3325N3325N3250N

NORTHERN EXTENT4050N4050N4050N4050N4550N4450N4450N4450N4300N4050N

TOTAL

LENGTH (m)8007507507501150120012001125975800

9500

Table l: Reconnaissance Survey Coveraae at Marchaud Property.


Detailed (Realsection) Coverage (AB = 1 500-3000m)

LINE9150E9250E9350E9450E9550E9650E9950E10050E

it AB SPACINGS33333311

AB LENGTHS (m)1500-3000

3000"

MIN. EXTENT3300N3300N3300N3300N3300N3250N3625N3250N

MAX. EXTENT4050N4050N4050N4050N4400N4450N3725N3650N

TOTAL

TOTAL LENGTH (m)220022502250225028002850100400

15100

Table II: Realsection (Detail) Survey Coverage

3.5 INSTRUMENTATION

* Receiver:

* Transmitter:

* Power Supply:

BRGM/IRIS IP-6 (6 channel; Time Domain)

Phoenix IPT-2B (15 kWatt 1100-3200V)

Kohler Motor Generator (25HP72cyl) * Westinghouse Alternator (30 kVA @ 400Hz)

3.6 PARAMETERS

* Input Waveform: Square wave @ 0.0625 hz, 50"M) duty cycle.

* Receiver Sampling Parameters: Q IP custom windows (see Table III)

* Measured Parameters:

1. Chargeability in mVTV across max. 10 time-gates, plus area under decay curve.

2. Primary Voltage in millivolts and Input Current in milli-amperes for Resistivity in Q-m calculated according to Gradient Array geometry factor1 .

1 Ref. BRGM ELREC-6 Operating Manual.


SliceTdT1T2T3T4T5T6T7TST9TIO

Total Tp

Duration (msec)60606060603603603607207207203540

Start (msec)0601201802403006601020138021002820

End (msec)6012018024030066010201380210028203540

Mid-Point (msec)

801502102704808401200174024603180

Table III: Decay Curve Sampling.

3.7 MEASUREMENT ACCURACY AND REPEATABILITY

Chargeability:

* Resistivity:

3.8 DATA PRESENTATION

generally less than ± 0.5 mV/V but acceptable to ±1.0mVAA

less than 50Xo cumulative error from Primary voltage and Input current measurements.

* Maps:

1) Reconnaissance/Detail Coverage: Contoured plan maps of Total Chargeability andApparent Resistivity, AB=4000m, scale of 1:5000, overlaying Pentland Firth Drillhole Compilation base map (DWG. NO LUDGATE) (2 maps).

2) "Realsection" Detail follow-up: Contoured depth section maps of Total Chargeability and Apparent Resistivity, at scales of 1:2500, for lines with multiple ABs (6 maps).


* Digital:

Raw data:

Processed data:

IP-6 digital dump file (see Appendix D)

ASCII Geosoft .XYZ format.

using the following format:

Column 1 = Station (X Position), in metresColumn 2 = Line (Y Position), in metresColumn 3 = Apparent Resistivity, in Q-mColumn 4 - Total Chargeability, in mV/VColumn ^ - TDIP Spectral Estimates, derived using IPREDC™

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED

Jeff Warne General Manager

Christine Williston Junior Geophysicist

Jean Legault Senior Geophysicist

Paul Cassidy J Project Manager

Porcupine, ON June, 1997

10

P190 PENTLAND FIRTH VENTURES LTD.Marchaud RSIP

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

l, Jean M. Legault, declare that:

1. l am a consulting geophysicist with residence in Timmins, Ontario and am presently employed in this capacity with the Quantec group, of Waterdown, Ontario.

2. l obtained a Bachelor's Degree, with Honours, in Applied Science (B.A.Sc.), Geological Engineering (Geophysics Option), from Queen's University at Kingston, Ontario, in Spring 1982.

3. l am a registered professional engineer (# 047032), with license to practice in the Province of Quebec, since 1985.

4. l have practiced my profession continuously since May, 1982, in North-America, South-America and North-Africa.

5. l am a member of the Society of Engineers of Quebec, the Quebec Prospectors Association, the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada, and the Society of Exploration Geophysicists.

6 l have no interest, nor do l expect to receive any interest in the properties or securities of Pentland Firth Ventures Ltd.

7. l oversaw the interpretation, the report preparation, the final drawings, and provided the recommenda tions attached and hereby attest to their accuracy herein.

8. The statements made in this report represent my professional opinion based on my consideration of the information available to me at the time of writing this report.

Porcupine, Ontario June, 1997

Jean M. Legault, P.Eng. (QC) Chief Geophysicist Dir. Technical Services Quantec Group



l, Christine Williston, hereby declare that:

1. l am a processing geophysicist with residence in South Porcupine, Ontario and am presently employed in this capacity with Quantec Consulting Inc. of Porcupine, Ontario.

2. l am a graduate of York University, North York, ON, in 1994, with an Honours Bachelor of Science De gree in Earth and Atmospheric Science.

3. l have practiced my profession in Canada since graduation.

4. l have no interest nor do l expect to receive any interest, direct or indirect, in the properties or securi ties of Pentland Firth Ventures Ltd.

5. The maps created and statements made in this report accurately represent the information given to me at the time of the preparation of this report.

Porcupine, Ontario June, 1997

Christine Williston, B.Sc. Processing Geophysicist Quantec Technical Services



l, G.R. Jeffrey Wame, hereby declare that:

1. l am a geophysicist with residence in South Porcupine, Ontario and am presently employed in this capacity with Quantec IP Inc. of Waterdown, Ontario.

2. l studied Engineering Geophysics in the Faculty of Applied Science at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, completing all but two of the course requirements for a B.Sc.(Eng.) in 1981.

3. l have practiced my profession continuously since May, 1981 in Canada, the United States and Chile.

4. l have no interest, nor do l expect to receive any interest in the properties or securities of Pentland Firth Ventures Ltd.

5. The statements made in this report represent my professional opinion based on my consid eration of the information available to me at the time of writing this report.

Porcupine, Canada June, 1997

G. R. Jeffrey Wame Senior Geophysicist General Manager - QIP


THEORETICAL BASIS

The "RealSection" survey design uses multiple gradient arrays - with variable depths of in vestigation controlled by successive changes in array size/geometry. The method of data acquisition and the "RealSection" presentation are based on the specifications developed by Dr. Perparim Alikaj, of the Polytechnic University of Tirana, Albania, over the course of 10 years of application. This technique has been further developed for application in Canada during the past four years, in asso ciation with Mr. Dennis Morrison, president of Quantec IP Inc.

The Gradient Array measurements are unique in that they best represent a bulk average of the surrounding physical properties within a relatively focused sphere of influence, roughly equal to the width of the receiver dipole, penetrating vertically downward from surface to great depths. These depth of penetration and lateral resolution characteristics are showcased when presented in plan, however through the use of multiple-spaced and focused arrays, the advantages of the gradient ar ray are further highlighted when the IP/Resistivity data are fully developed in cross-section, using RealSections.

The resistivity is among the most variable of all geophysical parameters, with a range ex ceeding 106 . Because most minerals are fundamentally insulators, with the exception of massive accumulations of metallic and submetallic ores (electronic conductors) which are rare occurrences, the resistivity of rocks depends primarily on their porosity , permeability and particularly the salinity of fluids contained (ionic conduction), according to Archie's Law. In contrast, the chargeability re sponds to the presence of polarizeable minerals (metals, submetallic sulphides and oxides, and graphite), in amounts as minute as parts per hundred. Both the quantity of individual chargeable grains present, and their distribution with in subsurface current flow paths are significant in control ling the level of response. The relationship of chargeability to metallic content is straightforward, and the influence of mineral distribution can be understood in geologic terms by considering two similar, hypothetical volumes of rock in which fractures constitute the primary current flow paths. In one, sul phides occur predominantly along fracture surfaces. In the second , the same volume percent of sulphides are disseminated throughout the rock. The second example will, in general, have signifi cantly lower intrinsic chargeability.


y-axist .

Y

1A jr

LJM N

- i fc y ft Y i*?

X B

Figure C1:: Gradient array configuration

Using the diagram in Figure C1 for the gradient array electrode configuration and nomen clature: 2 , the gradient array apparent resistivity is calculated:

where: the origin O is selected at the center of ABthe geometric parameters are in addition to a s AB/2 and b = MN/2 X is the abscissa of the mid-point of MN (positive or negative) Y is the ordinate of the mid-point of MN (positive or negative)

Gradient Array Apparent Resistivity:VP

pa = K —— ohm-metres

where: K = 2n

= ^|(a+x-b) 2 + y 2

+y

= ^|(x-b-a)2 +y 2

+y

Using the diagram in Figure C2 for the Total Chargeability:

From Terraplus\BRGM, IP-6 Operating Manual, Toronto, 1987.

P190 PENTLAND RRTH VENTURES LTD. Marchaud RSIP

Measured Voltage Line One half of Transmit Cycle

"Off Time"positive

negative"On Time" t (0)

Figure C2 The measurement of the time-domain IP effect.

the total apparent chargeability is given by:

Total Apparent Chargeability:3

MT ^ J t'' ̂ s (t) dt millivolts per voltl'\

tpVp 1=1

where f/, f/^-j are the beginning and ending times for each of the chargeability slices,

More detailed descriptions on the theory and application of the IP/Resistivity method can be found in the following reference papers:

1. Cogan, H., 1973, Comparison of IP electrode arrays, Geophysics, 38, p 737 - 761.

2. Langore, L., Alikaj, P., Gjovreku, D., 1989, Achievements in copper sulphide exploration in Alba nia with IP and EM methods, Geophysical Prospecting, 37, p 925 - 941 .

From Telford, et al., Applied Geophysics, Cambridge D Press, New York, 1983..


PRODUCTION SUMMARY

P-190 PENTLAND FIRTH VENTURES LTD.MICHAUD TWP. ONT. JUNE 3-18/97

Date3-Jun

4-Jun

5-Jun

6-Jun

7-Jun

8-Jun

9-Jun

10-Jun

11-Jun

12-Jun

13-Jun

14-Jun

DescriptionMob to Perry lake lodge. Drove to grid to check out grid access.Established AB 4000M @5500N and 1500N on L9650E. Got truck stuck at southern end of AB while trying to gain access.Surveyed L9150E, 9250E, L9350E. Surveying slow be cause of poor contacts.

TOTALSurveyed L9450E, L9550E. Thunderstorms in the after noon made it impossible to survey and get valid data. Half day Weather

TOTALSurveyed L9550E, L9650E, L9750E.

TOTALRented boat to establish lake electrodes on lines 9850E and 9950E.Started to survey L9850E when starter broke from motor making it unusable. Arrived at grid at 3:30 PM Surveyed L9850E ,L9950E. Half survey day 1 Down Day

TOTALSurveyed L9950E, L10050E, Re-established AB3000M@5000N and 2000N on L9650E . Surveyed L10050E, 9950E

TOTAL

TOTAL DETAILSurveyed L9650E, 9550E, tested two new TX systemspulled out of bush by order of M.N.R. Half standby day.

TOTAL DETAILStand by day waiting for rain to decrease the risk of fire hazard.Surveyed L9550E, L9450E, L9350E, L9250E, L9150E

TOTAL DETAILRe-established AB 2200® 4800N, and2600N on L9400E. Surveyed L9150E, L9250E.

TOTAL DETAIL

AB

4000M

4000M4000M

4000M

4000M

4000M4000M4000M

4000

4000

4000

4000

30003000

30003000

30003000300030003000

2200

2200

Line

9150E

9250E9350E

9450E

9550E

9550E9650E9750E

9850E

9950E

9950E

10050E

10050E9950E

9650E9550E

9550E9450E9350E9250E9150E

9150E

9250E

Start

3250N

3300N3350N

3300N

3300N

4050N3250N3250N

4450N

3725N

3725N

4050N

3250N3725N

4450N4450N

3800N4050N4050N4050N4050N

4000N

40 SON

End

4050N

4050N4050N

4050N

4050N

4450N4450N4450N

3325N

3325N

4300N

3250N

3650N3625N

3250N3800N

3300N3300N3300N3300N3300N

3300N

3300N

Total

800

750750

2300M750

7501500M

40012001200

2800M

1125

4001525M

575

8001375M

400100

500M1200650

1850M

500750750750750

3500M700

7501450M


Date15-Jun

16-Jun

17-Jun

18-Jun

DescriptionNorth AB electrodes dried out during surveying and had to be re-sfltted . Surveyed L9350E, L9450E L9550E, L9650E. Fuel line on generator had to be repaired near the end of the day.

TOTAL DETAILRe-established two 1500M AB's First at 2950N and4450N on L9250E . The second at 2950N and4450N on L9550N . Surveyed L9150E, L9250E

TOTAL DETAILSurveyed L9350E, L9450E, 9550E, 9650E, started to pull in far ends of AB.

TOTAL DETAILPulled in AB and wire used for lake electrodes demob back to Porcupine.

TOTAL RECONNAISSANCETOTAL DETAIL

AB2200

220022002200

1500.A

1500,A

1500.A

1500,81500, B1500.B

Line9350E

9450E9550E9650E

9150E

9250E

9350E

9450E9550E9650E

Start4050N

4050N4200N4200N

4050N

4050N

4050N

4050N4050N4050N

End3300N

3300N3300N3300N

3300N

3300N

3300N

3300N3300N3300N

Total750

750900900

3300M750

7501500M

750

750750750

3000M

9.5 KM15.1 KM


INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS

Iris IP-6 (6 channel) Receiver(from IRIS Instruments IP 6 Operating Manual)

Weather proof case

Dimensions: Weight:

Operating temperature:

Storage: Power supply:

Input channels:Input impedance:Input over-voltage protection:Input voltage range:

SP compensation:

Noise rejection:

Primary voltage resolution: accuracy:

Secondary voltage windows:

Sampling rate: Synchronization accuracy: Chargeability resolution:

accuracy:

Battery test: Grounding resistance: Memory capacity: Data transfer:

31 cm x 21 cm x 21 cm6 kg with dry cells7.8 kg with rechargeable bat.-200C to 700C(-400C to 700C with optional screen heater)(-400C to 700C)6 x 1.5 V dry cells (100 hr. @ 200C) or2 x 6 V NiCad rechargeable (in series) (SOhrs @ 200C) or 1 x 12 Vexternal610 M ohmup to 1000 volts10V maximum on each dipole15 V maximum sum over eh 2 to 6automatic ± 10 V with linear drift correctionup to 1 mV/s50 to 60 Hz powertine rejection100 dB common mode rejection (for 1^5=0)automatic stacking1 nV after stackingD.3% typically; maximum 1 over wholetemperature rangeup to 10 windows; 3 preset window specs.plus fully programmable sampling.10 ms10 ms, minimum 40 nV0.1 mV/Vtypically D.6%. maximum 2 Vo of reading ± 1 mV/V forVp > 10 mVmanual and automatic before each measurement0.1 to 467 kohm2505 records, 1 dipole/recordserial link @ 300 to 19200 baud remote control capabilitythrough serial link @ 19200 baud


INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS

IPT-2B Transmitter

Power Sources:

Output Voltage:

Output Power

Maximum Current:

Ammeter Ranges:

Meter Display:

Current regulation:

Output waveform:

Output waveform IPT-2B option:

Operating Temperature:

Frequency Stability:

Transient Protection:

Thermal Protection:

Dimensions:

Weight:

Shipping Weight:

Phoenix MG-19 (10KVA, 120V, 3 phase, 400Hz) motor generator (30KVA, 120V, 3 phase) motor generator Phoenix MG-1, 2 or 3 can also be used, but will generate Vi the voltage

To 1400V in four ranges of resp. 250-375V, 420-630V, 650-975V, 935-1400V. Voltage is continuously variable ± 200Xo from each nominal step value.

Maximum continuous output power is 10KW. Absolute max output power is 15KW.

15 Amps

30mA, 100mA, 1A, 3A, 10A and 30A full scale.

A meter function switch selects the display of current level, regulation status, input frequency, output voltage, control battery voltage or line voltage

The change in output current is less than Q.2% for a 100Xo change in input volt age or electrode impedance. Regulation is achieved by feedback to the alter nator of the motor generator unit.

Either DC, single frequency, two frequencies simultaneously, or time domain (50"Xo duty cycle). Frequencies of 0.078, 0.156, 0.313, 1.25, 2.5 and 5.0 Hz are standard, whereas 0.062, 0.125, 0.25,1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 Hz are optionally available. The simultaneous transmission mode has 0.313 and 5.0 Hz as standard, whereas 0.156 and 2.5 Hz are optional.

9 frequencies in binary progression: 1/16 -1/32 -1/16 -1/8 -1/4 -1/2 -1 2 and 4, withvanable duty cycle. Selectable to one of four values: 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1. NOTE: Duty cycle = 1 is the operation equal to the standard frequency domain cycling, i.e. Full On, except for a SOm.sec. gap at each half cycle.

-400C to

±1 0Xo from -400C to -f600C is standard. A precision time base is optionally available for coherent detection and phase IP measurements.

Current is turned off automatically if it exceeds 1500Xo full scale or is than 50Xo fullscale.

Unit is fan-forced cooled. Thermostat turns transmitter off at 650C and turns back on at 550C internal temperature.

46 x 46 x 32cm (18x1 8x1 Sin)

45kg

56kg


IP 6 DUMP FILE FORMAT

IP 6 (V9.1)*

#77 Jut 1 1980 11:57dipole 1 trigger 1 domain Time T wave Programmable wind. Grad. RCTGL array

V= 331 . 605 Sp:; -31 9 \* 1 350.00 Rs= 0.50 Ro= 6679.4 Ohm.m M= 1 1.97E= 0.4 M^ 40.44 1^/12=33.55 1^/13=29.48 1^14=26.68 1^15=20.95 M6= 1 5.52 M7= 12.50 M8= 9.77 M9" 7.50 M10= 6.05

V_D=1260 M_D= 40 ^_M^ = 20 •Y_M2= 30 T_M3= 30 TJM* 30 T_M5= 180 T_M6= 180 J_M7= 1 80 T_M8= 360 TJ/I9O60 TJ/1 10=360

Spacing config. : Imperial grid XP^1 300.0 Lff^ 400.0 0=^00.0 AB/2' 2500.0

#78 Jul 1 1980 11:57dipole 2 trigger 1 domain Time T wave Programmable wind. Grad. RCTGL array

V= 265.781 Sp= 388 N 1350.00 Rs= 1.41 Ro= 4687.7 Ohm. m IV^ 26.75 E" 0.0 1^11=76.18 M2= 66.06 M3= 59.31 W^ 54.53 1^15=44.38 1^16=34.29 M7= 28.35 1^18=22.83 1^19=18.06 1^10=14.96

cycN 19Time=2000 VJ^ 1260 M_D= 40 J_M^= 20 ^IV^ 30 T_M3= 30 ^N^ 30 T_M5=180 T_M6=180 T_M7=180 ^IV^ 360 T_M9=360 ^1^110=360

Spacing config. : Imperial grid XP—1400.0 LB^ 400.0 D" -100.0 AB/2= 2500.0


APPENDDCF

LIST OF MAPS

* Posted Contoured Plan Maps: (Scale of 1:5000)

1. Total Chargeability (4000m AB) Apparent Resistivity (4000m AB)

* Contoured "Realsection" Map. (Scale of 1:5000)

1. Total Chargeability/Apparent Resistivity: Line 91+50E



4. Total ChargeabilityApparent Resistivity: Line 94+50E



TOTAL PLANS MAPS = 2 TOTAL REALSECTIONS = 6. TOTAL MAPS 8

DWG# P190-PLAN-CHG-1 DWG# P190-PLAN-RES-1

DWG# P-190-RSIP-91+50E






P190PENTLAND FIRTH VENTURES LTD.

Marchaud RSIP

PLAN MAPS AND SECTIONS

42A08NE0127 2.17716 MICHAUD 020177l6

by: Jean M Legault, P. Eng.Director Technical Services Quantec Consulting Inc. 101 King Street, P.O. Box 580 Porcupine, ON PON 1CO Tel: (705)2352166 Fax: (705)2352255

PROJECT IN REVIEW

Gene KallfaSenior Geophysicist Quantec Consulting Inc. 101 King Street, P.O. Box 580 Porcupine, ON PON 1 CO Tel: (705)2352166 Fax: (705)2352255

At the request of Pentland Firth Ventures Ltd., the following interpretation briefly summarizes the results of ground geophysical surveys ever the Marchaud Project, in Michaud Township, in northwest- em Ontario, obtained in June, 1997 by Quantec SP Inc. The surveys consist of time-domain induced polarization and resistivity, using the Gradient-Realsection technique and were intended to locate and delineate zones containing disseminated sulphides, potentially associated with Mclntyre-Hollinger type gold mineralization within quartz-carbonate altered shear-zones. This report serves as an addendum to the previously submitted logistics report (ref. P190, 06/97), which contained all necessary survey maps and an interpretation plan (without attached comments), in order to fully conform to OMNDM assess ment requirements.

4. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION......................................................................................... 24.1 OVERVIEW.............................................................................................................................24.2 GRADIENT-REALSECTION SURVEY RESULTS............................................................................. 2

5. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................ 4

APPENDIX A: STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS:

APPENDIX B: THEORETICAL BASIS

42A08NE0127 2.17716 MICHAUD 020C

' REALSECTION is a registered trademark of Quantec IP Inc., of Waterdown, Ontario, Canada.

Interpretation Addendum. Pentland Firth Ventures Ltd. QIP Project P190 Marchaud Gradient-Reabection TDIP

4.1 OVERVIEWThe gradient induced polarization and resistivity surveys at the Marchaud property were designed

to provide additional information on the bedrock geology and structure, based on their chargeability and resistivity characteristics, in plan, investigating to depths up to or exceeding 300 meters. The target model is based on the Mclntyre-Hollinger model, where ^"/o disseminated Au-bearing sulphides occur along discordant to concordant, sub vertical structurally-controlled, quartz-carbonate altered shears end QFP-dykes. The Gradient-Realsection IP/Resistivity technique was chosen based on its deep penetration and high resolution capabilities, and its proven success in the Timmins-Kirkland Lake camp.

The property is situated in-the "Golden Highway Area" east of the Timmins-Porcupine mining camp, just east of Matheson, in an area SW of Pike Lake and Highway 101, which lies just north of the ENE- trending Destor-Porcupine Fault and south of the ESE trending Pipestone Fault (ref. ODM-OGS, Tim mins-Kirkland Lake. Geological Compilation, Map # 2205, 1:253,440 scale, 1984). The present survey area of the property is extensively overburden-covered, and is entirely underlain by felsic intrusive rocks (ref. PFV, Drill-hole Compilation Map. Garrison Creek JV/Marchaud Property, 1:5000 scale, Dec. 95). A narrow, ESE-oriented, Mesozoic kimberlite dyke and a NNE to NS trending Matachewan diabase dyke also cross-cut the survey area. NNE and EW-trending faults have been interpreted/mapped on the property, although NE and SW trends are also suspected geologically (D. Crick, PFV, pers. comm., 07/97). Shear-hosted, gold occurrences are noted on the grid, including the Ludgate Zone (LLZ), which forms a visible EW topographic/fault lineament extending west of Ludgate Lake, as well as the shorter DRC zone lying further south and west (IBID).

The property has been extensively explored, with sulphide, molybdenum and gold showings being known and drill-tested since the mid-1980's (IBID). Ground geophysical surveys include large-dipole (100m), phase induced polarization (ref. Geola Exploration, Michaud Twp. IPVResistivitv Survey, 1986) using dipole-dipole array, as well as ground magnetics and VLF-electromagnetics undertaken by Fal conbridge Exploration Ltd. A more detailed ground magnetic survey has been undertaken concurrently with the present TDIP survey, by PFV - the results of which are available for comparison.

4.2 GRADIENT-REALSECTION SURVEY RESULTSThe IPVResistivity and TFM/VLF results over Marchaud successfully discriminate signatures poten

tially associated with lithology, fault-fracture structures, chemical alteration, and, most importantly, chargeability responses related to sulphides and, potentially, precious and base metals mineralization. The geophysical compilation/interpretation plan presents the interpreted anomaly axes, as an overlay on the geologic base map - highlighting the strength and resistivity-association of the IP axes, which relates to their source/alteration type:

a) High resistivity IP axes, related to disseminate sulphides possibly associated with quartz- carbonate altered vein systems;b) Nil o and contact-type IP axes likely to correspond to more weakly-altered disseminated sul

phides along geologic contact margins, as well as thin/buried stringer sulphides zones; andc) Low resistivity IP axes generally relating to either disseminate-mineralized, clay/sericite-

altered/porous fault-fractures or, associated with strong chargeabilities, possibly stringer sul phide or graphite mineralization.

In the latter two cases, the greater conductivity associated with the structure would likely overprint the low-porosity effects associated with any possible attendant quartz-carbonate alteration. It is clear, therefore, that while the high resistive/high chargeabilities represent the favoured target-model, all

2

Interpretation Addendum. Pentland Firth Ventures Ltd. QIP Project P190 Marchaud Gradient-Reateection TDIP

anomaly types could potentially represent equally valid exploration targets.

The chargeability anomalies identified on the interpretation plan have been: a) categorized accord ing to their strength (weak, moderate, strong) using symbols, b) classified according to their resistivity association (high p, nil p/contact-type, low p) using coloured axes, and c) where Realsection coverage is available, assigned a DDH-target-depth , next to the axis symbol. The line-to-line correlation of anoma lies into axes is based primarily on resistivity association (i.e. resistive and conductive anomalies never aligned along the same axis due to likely dissimilar mineralogy/alteration/origin). In order to better visu alize the relationships between the IP and Resistivity, contrasting zones of high resistivity, interest have been identified on the interpretation plan, using cross-hatching - highlighting potential geologic contacts, alteration zones and fault-fracture structure - all of which are key elements to the geologic target model.

Both the chargeability and resistivity data obtained at Marchaud d isplay a moderate range. The measured chargeabilities vary between 6-12 millivolts per volt (•*8mVA/ avg.), which can be considered as being weak to moderate, but is consistent with low bulk disseminate sulphide content found in similar rocks of the Timmins-Porcupine camp - with the peak highs concentrated along linear zones relating to 2-5% sulphides within resistive zones, and possibly weaker concentrations along the more conductive lineaments. Of course, in areas of stronger overburden cover (particularly just south of the Ludgate Fault), the resulting attenuation of the chargeability could exceed 50*36 - as such prioritizing anomalies in areas of contrasting OB cover should be considered separately.

The 2k-14k ohm-meter range in apparent resistivities can be considered moderately resistive, and is consistent with the lower porosities associated with felsic intrusive rocks. Linear zones of resistivity low defined in plan likely relate to porous fault-fracture zones, while contrasting high resistivity linears could coincide with possible qtz-altered shear zones - several of which coincide with IP highs. On the other hand, broader zones of lower resistivity (i.e. south of the Ludgate Fault) coinciding with lower charge ability both indicate the presence of overburden-bedrock depressions, rather than, say, pervasive clay- alteration or a change in lithology. Similarly, broad high resistive zones and weak chargeability (i.e. north of the Ludgate) may be better ascribed to bedrock-topographic highs and outcrop, rather than per vasive silicification and increased sulphide content.

It is worthwhile noting that, in previous VLF-EM and dipole-dipole IPVResistivity surveys, the Lud gate Fault was mistakenly identified as a conductor thought to host stringer sulphides (due to Fraser Filtering and distortions in the ^4^=100 Metal Factor plan map), whereas the present Gradient- Realsection correctly defines the LFZ as a geoelectric contact, resembling a dip-slip fault. Also worth noting, the ground magnetics define the mapped NNE-diabase as a narrower, more discontinuous and fault-displaced feature than previously indicated - it also appears to lie along a noticeable break in the IPXResistivity signatures which agrees with its late-tectonic NS-fault control. Similarly, while the kimber lite dike has no visible coincident response in either the ground magnetic or IP\Resistivity coverage (likely due to its thin nature), it lies along a noticeable ESE break, which corroborates a syntectonic fault-control. Finally, the contoured ground magnetic display visible NE-trending textures, which sug gest the presence of previously unmapped NE-SW structures - potentially altered l magnetite-depleted.

The weak and moderate chargeability axes are equally divided between high, nil/contact-type and low resistivity trends, whose orientations vary between grid ESE, EW and, occasionally, ENE trends. The high to nil resistivity anomaly types, potentially associated with silicification/alteration, are mainly concentrated in the northern half and southern limit of the survey area, where outcrop is more abundant - notably, the Ludgate Shears coincides with a weak-moderate but discontinuous high resistivity IP axis occurring along a prominent high/low resistivity contact. The more conductive IP features, associated with mineralized open or sericite-altered structures, are concentrated in the central and southern half of the survey area - the most notable of which coincides with the DRC mineralized zone, which features a well-defined IP signature and appears to remain open to the west.

As indicated on the interpretation plan, about twenty (20) anomalous chargeability axes of signifi cance have been identified, hosting moderate chargeability and therefore reflecting low sulphide con tent. Although the bulk chargeabilities increase to the west, localized increases along the margins of mapped NS faults and other visible IP\Resistivity breaks, appear to suggest increased mineralization

3

Interpretation Addendum. Pentland Firth Ventures Ltd. QIP Project P190 Marchaud Gradient-Realsection TDIP

adjacent to NS structures, which may be of exploration interest. In Realsection, all polarizeable zones appear thin ^25m width), subvertically dipping, subcropping and, although, vertically-extensive, many exhibit apparent pinching and swelling (as denoted by multiple target depths).

The Gradient Realsection IP/Resistivity results at the Marchaud Property identify potential charge ability and resistivity signatures relating to the subsurface geology, including possible fault-fracture structures, geochemical alteration and also weak concentrations of disseminated mineralization poten tially associated with gold-mineralized, quartz l carbonate and sericite-altered fault-fractures and shear zones. In response to the geologic objectives, the Gradient-Realsection has successfully identified co incident IP axes over zones of known mineralization, including the Ludgate Shear and the DRC zone, both of which feature weak to moderate chargeability but whose contrasting resistivity signatures sug gest differences in host-rock alteration. In addition, elsewhere on the property, other chargeability axes of similar type and strength have been identified which host sufficient width, strike-length and geoelectric characteristics to warrant similar drill-testing. In particular, weak increases in chargeability for IP axes in proximity to discordant NS or NE breaks suggest better potential for Au-mineralization.

We recommend that the current targets be carefully evaluated during the DDH-testing stage - par ticularly with regards to the target model and the possible importance of cross-cutting NS-NE breaks. When DDH-targeting, particular attention should also be given to optimal target depth provided as well as the probable type of mineralization/alteration indicated by the resistivity association. As a result of the relative lack of depth control inherent with the gradient profiling technique, we stress the need for adequate RSIP coverage prior for DDH targeting. We also recommend the extension of the Gradient- Realsection program over the remainder of the survey area - particularly in areas of heavier overburden cover, where previous conventional IP\Resistivity coverage would have proven inadequate due to poor resolution and volume-averaging. In order to reduce the cost of surveying, grid-coverage using Gradi ent array, with later follow-up on selected anomalies is recommended. Additional post-processing, in the form of shadow enhancement filtering and, possibly, optimal parameter filtering should be envis aged.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED

GeVicikallfa Jean M. Legault, P.Eng. Senior Geophysicist Senior Geophysicist

Reg. No. 90531542

Porcupine, ON February, 1998.


STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS:l, Jean M. Legault, declare that:

1. l am a consulting geophysicist with residence in South Porcupine, Ontario and am presently em ployed in this capacity with Quantec IP Inc. of Waterdown, Ontario.

2. l obtained a Bachelor's Degree, with Honours, in Applied Science (B.A.Sc.), Geological Engi neering (Geophysics Option), from Queen's University at Kingston, Ontario, in Spring 1982.

3. l am a registered professional engineer, since 1985, with license to practice in the Province of Ontario (Reg. # 90531542).

4. l have practiced my profession continuously since May, 1982, in North-America, South-America and North-Africa.

5. l am a member of the Society of Engineers of Quebec, the Quebec Prospectors Association, the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada, and the Society of Exploration Geophysi- cists.

6. l have no interest, nor do l expect to receive any interest in the properties or securities of Pentland Firth Ventures Ltd.

7. l am the co-author of this report and the statements contained represent my professional opinion based on my consideration of the information available to me at the time of writing this report.

Porcupine, Ontario February, 1998

C

Jean M. Legault, P.Eng. (ON) Chief Geophysicist Dir. Technical Services Quantec Group


STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS:l, Gene Kallfa, declare that:

1 . lama consulting geophysicist with residence in South Porcupine, Ontario and am presently employed in this ca pacity with Quantec IP Inc. of Waterdown, Ontario.

2. l obtained a Master's of Science Degree, (M.Sc.), Geophysics, from the Polytechnic University, in Tirana, Alba nia, in Spring 1987.

3. l have practiced my profession continuously since May, 1987, in North-America and Albania.

4. l have no interest, nor do l expect to receive any interest in the properties or securities of Pentland Firth Ven tures Ltd..

5. l assisted in the interpretation of the data and the information contained represent my professional opinion based on my consideration of the information available to me at the time of writing this report.

Porcupine, Ontario February, 1998

allfaSenior Geophysicist QIP /Technical Services

Interpretation Addendum. QIP Project P190

Pentland Firth Ventures Ltd. Marchaud Gradient-Realsection TDIP

THEORETICAL BASISThe "RealSection" survey design uses multiple gradient arrays - with variable depths of investigation con

trolled by successive changes in array size/geometry. The method of data acquisition and the "RealSection" pres entation are based on the specifications developed by Dr. Perparim Alikaj, of the Polytechnic University of Tirana, Albania, over the course of 10 years of application. This technique has been further developed for application in Canada during the past four years, in association with Mr. Dennis Morrison, president of Quantec IP Inc.

The Gradient Array measurements are unique in that they best represent a bulk average of the surround ing physical properties within a relatively focused sphere of influence, roughly equal to the width of the receiver di pole, penetrating vertically downward from surface to great depths. These depth of penetration and lateral resolu tion characteristics are showcased when presented in plan, however through the use of multiple-spaced and fo cused arrays, the advantages of the gradient array are further highlighted when the IP/Resistivity data are fully de veloped in cross-section, using RealSections.

The resistivity is among the most variable of all geophysical parameters, with a range exceeding 106 . Be cause most minerals are fundamentally insulators, with the exception of massive accumulations of metallic and submetallic ores (electronic conductors) which are rare occurrences, the resistivity of rocks depends primarily on their porosity , permeability and particularly the salinity of fluids contained (ionic conduction), according to Archie's Law. In contrast, the chargeability responds to the presence of polarizeable minerals (metals, submetallic sulphides and oxides, and graphite), in amounts as minute as parts per hundred. Both the quantity of individual chargeable grains present, and their distribution with in subsurface current flow paths are significant in controlling the level of response. The relationship of chargeability to metallic content is straightforward, and the influence of mineral distri bution can be understood in geologic terms by considering two similar, hypothetical volumes of rock in which frac tures constitute the primary current flow paths. In one, sulphides occur predominantly along fracture surfaces. In the second , the same volume percent of sulphides are disseminated throughout the rock. The second example will, in general, have significantly lower intrinsic chargeability.

y -ax is

LJM j N

x-axisB

Figure B1: Gradient array configuration

Using the diagram in Figure Blforthe gradient array electrode configuration and nomenclature: 1 , the gradient array apparent resistivity is calculated:

where: the origin O is selected at the center of AB the geometric parameters are in addition to a E AB/2 and b * MN/2 X is the abscissa of the mid-point of MN (positive or negative) Y is the ordinate of the mid-point of MN (positive or negative)

From Terraplus\BRGM, IP-6 Operating Manual. Toronto, 1987.


Pentland Firth Ventures Ltd. Marchaud Gradient-Realsection TDIP

Gradient Array Apparent Resistivity:VP

pa = K ohm - metres

where: K =2n

(AM'1 -AN'1 -BM'1 + BN'1

+y

AN s

BM-

BN =

Using the diagram in Figure B2 for the Total Chargeability:

4 2 , 2

Measured Voltage Line One half of Transmit Cycle

"Off Time"positive

Vs(t) (10 slices)

Time Line

negative ^—————— "On Time" t(0) t.

Figure D1 The measurement of the time-domain IP effect

the total apparent chargeability is given by:

Total Apparent Chargeability:2

MT ~ T^T 5] J t'

(O dt millivolts per voltttpVp i^tolO

where tj, tj+i are the beginning and ending times for each of the chargeability slices,

From Telford, et al., Applied Geophysics. Cambridge U Press, New York, 1983..


More detailed descriptions on the theory and application of the IP/Resistivity method can be found in the fol lowing reference papers:

1. Cogan, H., 1973, Comparison of IP electrode arrays, Geophysics, 38, p 737 - 761.2. Langore, L., Alikaj, P., Gjovreku, D., 1989, Achievements in copper sulphide exploration in Albania with IP and

EM methods, Geophysical Prospecting, 37, p 925 - 941.


Pentland Firth Ventures Ltd. Marchaud Gradtent-Realsection TDIP

* Contoured Plan Maps, printed in A4 Format

MAP TYPEPLAN

TOTAL

MAP NUMBERP-190-PLAN-CHG-1P-190-PLAN-RES-1

P-190-MAGCONT-MARCHAUD GRID3

TOTAL CHARGEABILITY (mV/V)

92QOE 9300E l !

9400E l

9500E l

9600E 970DE 9800E 100QOE

4400N-

4300N-

4200N-

4100N-

4000N —

39DON-

380QN-

3700N —

3600N-

3500N-

3400N —

3300N —

— 44QO.N

-43QON

- 4200N

— 41QON

— 4000N

— 3900N

-38GON

- 3700N

-3600N

-3500N

-3400N

-3300N

92QOE 9300El l l l 9400E 9500E 9600E 9700E 930QE 99CWE

l lOOOQE

-N-

Gradient Array—————AB—————

--plot point

Scale 1:5000Q 50 100 150 200 Z50 300

(meters)

PENTUND RRTH VENTURES LTDMARCHAND PROPERTY

MICHAUD TWP, ON

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEYGradient Array

TOTAL CHARGEABILITYAB S 4000 METERS

duty cycle) 4 - 4.S Anps

Transmitter Frequency 0.0625Transmitter CurrentDecoy Curve: Q1P (P-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows

1D Gates (60ms to 3540ms)Station Intervol: 25 HCfERS Chargeability Contour Interval: 0.5, 2.5 mV/V Colour Scale: Eijual Area Zoning

Dote: JUNE 97Instrumentation: Rx = IRIS IP-6 (S channels)

Tx - PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) -t MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed 4 Processed ty:QUANTEC IP INC.

DWG, f: P-190-PUN-CHG-1

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (ohm-metres)

9200E 9300E 9400E 9500E 96QQE 97QQE 980QE 9900E 10QOOE l l

4400N —

4300N-

42(X)N —

4100N-

4QOON -

39GON —

3800N —

3700N —

36DON —

3500N

3400N

330GN-

— 44QON

— 430GN

— 4200N

-41 CON

-4000N

- 3900N

-3800N

— 3700N

— J600N

- 3500N

- — 3400N

-3500N

9200E 9300E 940 DE 9500E 960 OE 9700E 9800El

9900E 10000E

-H-

Gradient Array -AB-

Scale 1:5000O 50 100 150 ZOO 250 300

(meters)

PENTLAND FIRTH VENTURES LTDMARCHAND PROPERTY

MICHAUD TWP, ON

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEYGradient Array

APPARENT RESISTIVITYAB^ 4000 METERS

0.0625 Hz {SK duty cycle) 4 - 4.8 Amps

Transmitter FrequencyTransmitter CurrentDecay Curve: QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Window*

10 Gates {60ms to 3540ms)Station Interval: 25 METERS Resistivity Contour Interval: 10 levels/log decode Colour Scale: Ejquall ATM Zoning

Date: JUNE 97Instrumentation: Rx - IRIS IP-6 (5 'Channels)

Tx * PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) t MG-30(30 WA)

Surveyed St Processed by:QUANTEC IP INC.

DWC, #: P-190-PWN-RE5-1

566500E 566600E 566700E 566800E 566900E 567000E 567100E 567200E 567300E 567400E 567500E 567600E

53710QON

537090QN

5370SQON

5370700N

5370600N

5370500N

5370400N

5370300N

5370200N

5370100N

5370000N

5369900N

5369800N

5371000N

53709QON

5370800N

5370700N

5370600N

5370500N

5369800N

5B6500E 5665QOE 566700E 568SOOE 566900E 567000E 5671 GOE 567200E 567300E 567500E 567600E

N-

Scole 1:500050 O 50 HOP 150 WO

PENFUND FIRTH VENTURES LTDMARCHAUD PROPERTY

MICHAUD TWP.GROUND MAGNETIC SURVEY

TOTAL FIELD CONTOUR |PL*N IMP(Diurnal Correct*))

toftfc 0*m: 56,600 nT ttWrt* h*otfcrc TSttejN Mu^Mtu Dedication fi dog W [Eurnd Camc&n Baaa Sb&n (15 mK/tyc) Stofco ntawt 12.9

OilCelSiiKCmkurteml: CdnrZbnjng:

Random(12.5m

IX, 500, 2030 nT

JJl. 1997 EBMMIN'

WANTBC CONSISTING we.Dm. HO. M90-UMCCNT-IWKJWO OTO

OntarioMinlsiry olNonhern Developmentand Mines

Declaration of Assessment Work Performed on Mining Land

Mining Act. Subsection 6 5(2) and 66(3). R S O 1990

Transaction Number (oriicd use)

.0(0 41 .Assessment Filos Research Imaging

Personal mtorm" Mining Act, the Questions aboi 933 Ramsey La

Instructions

l. Recorded holder(s) (Anach a list if necessary)

-3) and 66(3) ol ma Mining Acl U nder section 8 ol trie

lent work and correspond with the m ining land hoiaer

42A08NE0127 2.17716 MICHAUD 900

y ol Nonhtirn

:laim, use fo

Name -^ .

J) F^-lk Wok*-..* LVJ

IVAOName

Address

and Mines. 6th Floor.

PROVINCIAL R ECORDING OFFICE-SUDBURY

RECEIVED m 0240CT 1 5 1997A.M.

Clisnt NumDer

Talephori6 Number

Fax Number

Numbuf

Telephone Numbar

Fax Number

2. Type of work performed; Check ( ^ ) and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declaration.

Geotechnical: prospecting, surveys, assays and work under section 18 (regs) D Physical: drilling, stripping,

trenching and associated assaassays[~~] Rehabilitation

Work Typel . \\ \ l . —r- 7\

U*nc. wVV-'.rvo. tt -1..V.

Dates Work [}-l fxi IQO Pdrtormad From u~* V-'O *"H

Oar Munlh *u3'

Global Positioning Syslem Dam (il available)

Sv.i-o.-y

l^ To 18 , Ob \0|cl^-Da* j MlXllf Toil

Tov-nahcpfArua .

fvA'cKo. A) ^T" Vk'oM or G-Plan Number i

Office Use

Commodity

Total S Value ot. ir ^ ,— Work Claimed (T OO ^5*0 \

NTS Reference

mg ivision ^ ((^\f(j^.\^ (j ^x/Ci^

Resident Geolog st Disirici

Please remember to: - obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required;

- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;

- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212;- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked for assigning work,

- include two copies of your technical report

2.177163. Person or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list it necessary)

Name

Teluphone Number

iQSFax Number

Tslephorie Number

AddressPai Numour

4. Certification by Recorded Holder or Agent

l, iS(^'TV^r-y A f\ rv eJr- e. O ̂ - -\v\.-4K do hereby certify that l have personal knowledge of the facts setl * (Pflni Name) J

forth in this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to be performed or witnessed the same during

or after its completion and, to the best of my knowledge, the annexed report is true.

s Aaaross

IL^DTelephone Kumber

?OS-33Sr3*nFax Nrrpjar^05-335-

^ ^ i -m. l o

5. Work to be recorded and distributed. Work can only be assigned to claims that are contiguous (adjoining) to

the mining land where work was performed, at the time work was performed. A map showing the contiguous link

must accompany this form.

Mining Claim Number. Or ilwork was done on other eligible mining lend, show in this column the location number indicated on the claim map.

Number of Claim Units. For other mining land, list hectares

value of work performed on iriis claim or other mining land

Value of work applied to this claim.

Value ol work assigned Lo other mining claims.

Bank. Value o( work [O be distributed ai a Mure date

eg TB 7827 16 ha S26, 825 N/A S24.000 S2.825

eg 1234567 12 524,000

eg 1 234568 S 6. 892 S 4,000 S4.892

US43 -e-

M CAI t ̂ IL.24L -er * q aoo'm too

-e-j?ooZ

.LOO.

9

10

-e- ^Q.0.-e-11

12

13

-O- ôoX800 X

14-e- Soo X -o-

15-e- goo X

Column Totals

kUkryn A^l (Prim Fun

1=400 -31.000îH do hereby certify that the above work credits are eligible under

(Prim Full Name)

subsection 7 (l) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96 for assignment to contiguous clamns^t forâpplication to

the claim where the work was done. Oj) "| f. l JL *-;

Signature pI^*CorrJjd-ôlder or AganyJUjlnoriêd in Writing Date -w.. s mv6. Instructions for cutting back credits that are not approved.

Some of the credits claimed in this declaration may be cut back. Please check ( ^ ) in the boxes below to show how

you wish to prioritize the deletion of credits:

K 1 Credits are to be cut back from the Bank firsl, followed by option 2 or 3 or 4 as indicated.

•.J 2 . Credits are to be cut back starting with the claims listed last, working backwards; or

C 3. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims listed in this declaration; or

W 4. Credits are to be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or as follows (describe):

voW'.cV, *800 ; ^ e,ppU,D

Note: If you have not indicated how your credits are to be deleted, credits will be cut back from the Bank first,

followed by option number 2 if necessary.

For Office Use OnlyStamp Deemed Approved Dale

Date Approved

Dale Notification Sent

total Value Ol Credit Approved

Approved 'or Recording by Mining Recorder (Signature)'

SCHEDULE TO ACCOMPANY DECLARATION OF ASSESSMENT WORK PENTLAND FIRTH VENTURES LTD.

MININGCLAIMNUMBER

NUMBER OF CLAIM UNITS

VALUE OF WORK PERFORMED ON THIS CLAIM

VALUE OF WORK APPLIED TO THIS CLAIM

VALUE OFWORKASSIGNEDTO OTHERMININGCLAIMS

BANK- VALUE OF WORK TO BE DISTRIBUTED AT A LATER DATE

16-e- -e- -Gr

17-e- goo/ -o-

18 -e- -o-19 2oo X20

•o-21 if\ so aa L -o- -Q- •o-22

-0-

23-e- Soo/ -e-

24-e- -e-

25-e-

26-e-

27 400^28

29 LSoasoi -e-30

31-e- -e-

32 L80W03LO -e- HOO^33 -o- MOO/34 -e- -e-35 -o- -o- -o-36

-e- -e-37

-e- MOO X -o-38

-e-39

40 L 80t 05 S MOO^ -e-41

-e-42 -Qr

43-e- MOO* -Q- -e-

44-e-

45-e- MOO

46-e- MOO/ -e-

47-e- -o-

48-e- -e-

49 -W 8 JOt-e-

50-e- 400^ -o-

51-e- HOO/ -o

52

53-e- MOO

-o-54 MOO55

-e-TOTALS

l 1??

SCHEDULE TO ACCOMPANY DECLARATION OF ASSESSMENT WORK PENTLAND FIRTH VENTURES LTD.

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

TOTALS

MINING CLAIM NUMBER

LW 88 aL.vm\8LvuraaoLiq &831u*S8*a3Lurns asusssa'-iLVi883SUqaaîoUq^83T-L2CQ 41-^L 800 ̂ 4 ^

L8oi^ 29iLfloavi83LjoaM^LSaa^St;LSoaM82L8oaM8^L?oaMÔLSoav\q\L 80^ qq SLLgoa^q^L2o3tMc,u

—— .

NUMBER OF CLAIM UNITS

\

\

l

\

l

l

\

l

l

1

1

\

1

1

V1\\1l\

1l

—-

VALUE OF WORK PERFORMED ON THIS CLAIM

-e--^-o--e--e--e--Q--e--e--o~-o--G--o--e--e-HSh-e--e--e-~©--e--e--e-

—— TS8*l\

VALUE OF WORK APPLIED TO THIS CLAIM

M 00 X/HOO ^q oo/MOO^

HOG tfqoo/Hoo^*400/woo//ôo /xQOOiKgodKgoo^MOG 1̂MOO^

M 00^MOO 1^MDO^qooX"MOOXMOO^qoo^/

•xwoo ^

'•2,UOOO

VALUE OF WORK ASSIGNED TO OTHER MINING CLAIMS

-G-

-Q--e--e--e--e-

-e--e--e--o--o--e--e--o--e--e--o —-e--e--o-•e-

-o-ts-

^L OOO

BANK -VALUE OF WORK TO BE DISTRIBUTED AT A LATER DATE

-e--e--0-

-O--e--^-

-0--©-o--e--e-

-e--o--e--o--e--e--e--a--e-

•e--e-•o-

*asw\

l

AL'G. -15' 96iTHU 10:51 MRO PORCUPINE DIV

s*. . . M inistry otOntario N^j*v*1oprwfl

TEL-U5 560 2UU! P, 0112

Statement of Costa for Assessment Credit

Number (offca UM)

Mlnoa. 601 Fkxx. 933 Remaay Lska Road, Sudbury, Ontario. P3E 6B5

Work Type

\ - t (\ AlôUtr^ i****"3 ——— n: P. Sl-K/t-y

Associated Costs (e.g. supplies,

Units of WorkDepandino on Ihe typ" of work, ll*t If* number

ol houro/dKy* worVad, meiru at drilling, kilo-

melrvB cH gnd Una, numtiar of umpla, etc.

0\. Q Wr^.

mobilization and demobilization).

Transportation Costs

RECl

Pood end Lodging CostsGEOSliltN

Cost Per Unit

^3 C?. ^L k*. '

EIVEDwfp

jt ASSESSMENT! —-IFFIHF 1

Total Value of Assessment Work

Total Cost

*^Q 5^^

Jp ^*j ô ^^ 1 V

**J ^J ^J V^ 1

Calculations of Flllno Discounts:

1. Work filed within two years of performance Is claimed at 1000-fc bf the above Total Value of Assessment Work.

2. If work is filed after two years and up to five years after performance, it can onh/ be claimed at 50^ of the Total

Value of Assessment Work. If this situation applies to your claims, use the calculation below:

TOTAL VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORK 0.50 - Total S value of worked claimed.

Note:- Work older than 5 years Is not eligible for credit.

- A recorded holder may be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 45 days of a

request for verification and/or correction/clarification. If verincatlon and/or correction/clarification is not made, the

Minister may reject all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Certrflcatlon verifying costs:

vOt Vv^^yfî'- *S0t ^^V-Q| Ar^cL^^vJS-^^t'-is . do hereby certify, that the amounts shown are as accurate as may

ipig&flct print full nvTiA) *

reasonably be determined and the costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands indicated on

the accompanying Declaration of Work form as - t\ g. C o t-A) e. tj^ /Xcyg/y-V_______ l am authorized

to make (his certification.('•corded holder, mont, or state cornpany-ôartbri vnti s igning auiftority)

Signalu'o

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines Ontario

February 18, 1998

Kathryn Andrews-SmithPENTLAND FIRTH VENTURES LTD.BOX 1690HIGHWAY 101 EASTSOUTH PORCUPINE, ONPON-1HO

Geoscience Assessment Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5

Telephone: (888)415-9846 Fax: (705) 670-5881

Dear Sir or Madam:

Subject: Transaction Number(s):

Submission Number: 2 .17716

StatusW9780.01041 Approval After Notice

We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The

attached summary page(s) indicate the results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS

SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.

If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the notice, and any

steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision, subsection 6(7) of the

Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work which has received a 45 Day

Notice.

Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by the

response date on the summary.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Lucille Jerome by e-mail at

[email protected] or by telephone at (705) 670-5858.

Yours sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BYBlair KiteSupervisor, Geoscience Assessment OfficeMining Lands Section

Correspondence ID: 11906

Copy for: Assessment Library

Work Report Assessment Results

Submission Number: 2 .17716

Date Correspondence Sent: February 18,1998 Assessor:Lucille Jerome

Transaction NumberW9780.01041

Section:14 Geophysical IP

First Claim Number40914

Township(s) l Area(s)

MICHAUD

Status

Approval After Notice

Approval Date

February 17,1998

The revisions outlined in the Notice dated January 8,1998, have been corrected. Accordingly, assessment work credit has been approved as outlined on the

Declaration of Assessment Work Form accompanying this submission.

Correspondence to:

Resident Geologist Kirkland Lake, ON

Assessment Files Library Sudbury, ON

Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):

Kathryn Andrews-Smith

PENTLAND FIRTH VENTURES LTD.

SOUTH PORCUPINE, ON

Page:1 Correspondence ID: 11906

1 AN^ AND GRAVEL

' C SWIVEL PIT r*o. 762

AREAS WITHDRAWN HRGM STAKING

C URFACE RIGHTS WITHDRAWN FROM STAKING SECTION 42 (R.S.O/6O). FILE 164586

SURFACE AND MINING RIGHTS WITHDRAWN KRCM S T AK!NG. t :.T(ON 36,'8O. W.9'86. JAN 24. 1986

SE,., -r. 30 J-L-!6.'9'i NF- MA': !li.3-'.

THF INFORMATION THAT APPEARS ON THIS MAP HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES. AND ACCURACY IS NOT

l G UARANTEED. THOSE ' W ISHING TO STAKE MIN 'i i r G CLAIMS SHOULD CON i SULT WITH THE MINING i RECORDER. MINISTRY OF j NORTHERN DEVELOP ' M ENT AND MINES. r-OR AD

( DITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE

l LANDS SHOWN HEREON

NOTICE OF FORESTRY ACTIVITY: HIS TOWNSHIP i AREA FALLS WITHIN THE ̂

WATABEAG MANAGEMENT UNIT

AND MAY BE SUBJECT TC FORESTRY OPERATIONS. THE MNR UNIT FORESTER FOR THIS AREA CAN BECONTACTED AT:

P.O. BOX 129 SWASTIKA. ONT. POK ITO 705-642-3222

t ;; -"- 'i y

IOro i

c> .o

! ^ O C o ui - j——v SSJ*l. -

111006*00899 •i*,-1 --. X

i4M?i CT i looloa ^

i 9.x00*V*T~ ———— -P . , . ; ' \-

1201059*l*.-^*\ f

IJ?Ob'9O /24903 : .'249C4 /249O9

916075 i I029IOZ 1029101

^94608*" ; 946G6S ~803904 8O39OI i 8O39OO *Oft6*7

8059* 8O39-5 ! 8O3VO9 DO39C*946031 9160?? . 946O53 946C54

8O383? 8O3B9* ; 803889 8OJ*** 950250 950241 i 9!uJ48 95024?

i c 024*5 '8034*4 (OM98 *O3*M 8OSM

i 190228 0Z4B \ C'}' j

B4*489 94*683 II8CO4O8N 8OO489 M 'A•v. y K -

5*IV4 591*; i 653S42 ,. S5364I

-,., .,,-: r, r,, :

D/9S66 9798-JV 3 jd*8 9'984. ; 9'98-i

4S9 l.

97*846 97*8*7 j

f

D. /P.: i 1 h'iCOPY OF THIS MYLAR ARCHIVED APR.13/92AP-1': : .VLD i-AY ?4, ::::?-i

O-*

r".

v -

OROtH-lN-COUNClL

O lO ?eg

DATE RECEIVED r EB 3 1989

p-iC

^

r s

OC

MINISTRY OF NOR f HERN AND MINES

JUNE 1C. I98S

i^-

(ohm-metres)APPARENT RESISTIVir

L409 l

INDEX MAP

GeologyMAJOR ROCK DIVISIONS

FELSIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS

SYMBOLS

Geo oqicaf Contact

Road . TraiBL 3900N

L40919—- Lot/Concession Boundfir

jdga t e Lake

JA0918 Claim Boundary

Sec e 1:500050 '00 15^

PENTLAND FRTH VENTURES TD8.33/1 .2m

L4092015.5/1 .5m CARR SON CREEK J.V.AUD PROPERTY

M'chaud Township

L40913 1140914MARCWe s to way

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY Gradient Array

APPARENT RESISTIVITYAB= 4000 meters

0.0625 Hz (5055 duty cycle 4 Amps

QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows O Gates (60ms to 3540ms)

25 meters O levels/log decade

Equal Area Zoning

Transmitter Frequency Transmitter Current Decay Curve;

Station Interval: Resistivity Contour interval Colour Scale:

L45151 June 5-10, 1997 Rx = I RIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx - PHOEMIX IPT-2B(15 kW) t MG-3G(3Q kVA

Surveyed a Processed by:

QUANTEC IP INC.DWG. f. P -IGG-PLAN-KbS-1

LITY mV/VTOTAL CHARGEAR

K N 00 QQ

TL 44WN l h urn m Lake INDEX MAP

GeologyMAJOR ROCK DIVISIONS

9 FELSIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS

SYMBOLS

Geologica Contact

L409Road , Trail

BL 3900NBL J90QW-

L40919 Lot/Concession Bound*if^.—- — ~—.--—.^^__y f~ " f*i*. ^^^ jK " - t D' i- fetr. tf-^f l

,L4Q918. Claim Boundary

PENTLAND FRTH VENTURES EI8.33/1 .2rn 15.5/1,5m L40920 CARR SON CREEK J.V.

ARCHAUD PROPERM " c h a u d To w n s h i p

Westawoy

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY Gradient Array

TOTAL CHARGEABILITYAB= 4000 metersL45152

0.0625 Hz (50?S duty cycle) 4 Arnps

QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows 10 Gates (BQms to 354Gms)

25 meters0.5, 2.5 mV/V

Equal Area Zoning

Transmitter Frequency Transmitter Current Decay Curve:

Station Interval: Chargeability Contour Interval Colour Scale:L4M54tL45153CON n L45151

LOT 9

June 5-10, 1997Rx - IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx - PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) + MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed t-fr Processed by:

QUANTEC IP INC.DWG. #: P-190-PLAN-CHG-1

o coOJ


CL LoJ Q

3300N 3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N 4000N

l______l______l______l______l______l______l______\——

0-

-100-

-200-

-300-

-400-

-500-

-600-

-0

--100

l A Y\k A S/iVl/i. l -

T

--200

- -300

--400

- -500

O mT3

9-

-600

T l l l l l3300N 3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N 4000N

CL UJ Q

LINE 92+50ETOTAL CHARGEABILITY (mV/V) i 2.

3300N 3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N 4000N

l______l______l______l______l______l______l______l

0-

-100-

-200^

-300-

-400-

-500-

-600-

01 OJ-CTI 01 en oi-c-i to

l l T T r3300N 3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N

l 4000N

•-0

---100

-200

- -300

--400

•--500

n-600

m -o

AB—-—

Scale 1:500050 O 50 100 150 200 250 300

l C(metres)

PENTLAND FIRTH VENTURES LTDMARCHAUD PROPERTY

MICHAUD TWP. ON

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY REALSECTION L92+50E

to 4000 metersTransmitter Frequency 0.0625 Hz (50/5 duty cycle) Transmitter Current 1.8 - 4.8 Amps

Decay Curve: QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)

Station Interval: Resistivity Contour Interval: Chargeability Contour Interval: Colour Scale:

25 METERS10 levels/log decade

1 , 5 mV/VEqual Area Zoning

Date: JUNE 97

Instrumentation: Rx = IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)Tx = PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) -t- MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed * Processed by:

QUANTEC IP INC.DWG. f: P-190-RSIP-92+50E

o TtCM


3300N 3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N 4000N J______l______l______l______l______l______l______l

CL UJ Q

0-

-100-

-200-

-300-

-400-

-500-

-600-

-* o o

-o

--100

--200

--300

--400

--500

^-600

T l l l l l3300N 3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N

l 4000N


3300N 3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N 4000N l ___ J___ l______l______l______l______l______l

0-

-100-

-200-

-300-

- -400^

-500-

-600

-~j ---J en --j - ~-~j ^-j en oo

l l l l l l \ l

3300N 3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N 4000N

-O

--100

- -200

- -300

- -400

- -500

- - -600

om-Q

LINE 93+50E

50Scale 1:5000

50 100 150 200 250 300 -J i- (metres)


MICHAUD TWP, ON


to 4000 metersTransmitter Frequency 0.0625 Hz (50/0 duty cycle) Transmitter Current 1.8 - 4.8 Amps Decay Curve: QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows

10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)



1, 5 mV/VEqual Area Zoning

Date: Instrumentation:

JUNE 97 Rx = I RIS IP-6 (6 channels)

= P HOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) H- MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed tt Processed by:QUANTEC IP INC.

DWG. |: P-190-RSIP-93+50E

o 10


3300N 3400N 3500N 3600N

CL

0-

-100-

-200-

-300-

-400-

-500-

-600-

3700Nl

3800N 3900Nl

4000N

-O

--100

T T l33QON 3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N

l l l 3800N 3900N 4000N

- -200

- -300

--400

--500

g --600

C?

52^E

CL UJ Q


3300N 3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N 4000N l l l l l______l______l______l

0-

-100-

-200-

-300-

-400-

-500-

-600-

-0

Ol CTl Ol - -J -J -J CD. OD U3 UD tD.-J -J

l T T \3300N 3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N

l 4000N

-100

- -200

--300

--400

- -500

--600

Om

LINE 94+50E

Scale 1:500050 O 50 100 150 200 250 300

——H5S(metres)


MICHAUD TWP. ON


to 4000 metersTransmitter Frequency 0.0625 Hz (50?S duty cycle) Transmitter Current 2.6 - 4.8 Amps Decay Curve: QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows





Date: JUNE 97Instrumentation: Rx = IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx = PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) * M G-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed & Processed by:

QUANTEC IP INC.DWG. f: P-19Q-RSIP-94+50E

oCD CM


3300N 3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N 4000N l______l______l______l______l______l______l______l

CL LU Q

0-

-100-

-200-

-300-

-400-

-500-

-600-

-O

l 3300N

l r T T l

•--100

--200

- -300

--400

--500

- -600

Om

3i-

3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N 4000N

CL UJ Q

o-

-100-

-200-

-300-

-400-

-500-

-600-

3300N l

3400Nl


3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N 4000N l______l______l______l______l______l

CO CO-,-., CD --J ---J---J OO --J C71-CT5 C7a OJ CTl-CTl --J Cft (71 - O! CJ3

l l3300N 3400N

l l l \ l

— O

-100

--200

--300

Om

•--400 g

- -500

- -600

3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N 4000N

LINE 91+50Epu J'TJ

50Scale 1:5000

50 100 150 200l l

(metres)

250 300

PENTLAND FIRTH VENTURES LTDMARCHAUD PROPERTY MICHAUD TWP. ON


to 4000 metersTransmitter Frequency 0.0625 Hz (50?S duty cycle) Transmitter Current 1.8 - 4.8 Amps Decay Curve: QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows

10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)Station Interval: 25 METERSResistivity Contour Interval: 10 levels/log decadeChargeability Contour Interval: 1, 5 mV/VColour Scale: Equal Area Zoning


Tx = PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) ± M G-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed /b Processed by:QUANTEC IP INC.

DWG. l: P-190-RSIP-91+50E

o I"-.CM


CL UJ

Q

3300Nl

0-

-100-

-200-

-300-

-400-

-500-

-600-

3400N l

3500N 3600N l

3700N l

3800N 3900N l

4000Nl

4100N l

4200N l

4300N 4400N l

ro ro en

T~~

3300NT T T T T T T T

-O

--100

- -200

- -300

--400

--500

--600

3 9-

3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N 4000N 41 DON 4200N 4300N 4400N

.-8E

CL LU Q

3300N

0-

-100-

-200-

-300-

-400-

-500-

-600-

l3400N

l3500N

l3600N

l


3700N 3800N 3900N 4000N 4100N 4200N l______l______l______l______|______l

4300N l

4400N l

--100

-O

--200

--300

- - -400

- -500

- -600

3300N 3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N 4000N 4100N 4200N 4300N 4400N

a m ~a

LINE 95+50E

50Scale 1:5000

50 100 150 200 250 300-t ^z(metres)


MICHAUD TWP. ON


to 4000 metersTransmitter Frequency Transmitter Current

0.0625 Hz (5Q7o d uty cycle) 2.6 - 4.8 Amps

Decay Curve: QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)





Tx = PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) + MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed 8c Processed by:QUANTEC IP INC.

DWG. #: P-190-RSIP-95+50E

o00 CM


CL LU Q

-100-

-200-

-300-

-400-

-500-

-600-

3300N 3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N 4000N 41OON 4200N 4300N 4400N

l______l______l______l______l______l______l______l______l______l______l______l •-o

3300NT r T i i T

--100

-200

- -300

- -400

- -500

-600

O m

CD

3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N 4000N 41OON 4200N 4300N 4400N

LINE 96+50E

CL UJ Q

0-

-100-

-200-

-300-

-400-

-500-

-600-


3300N 3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N 4000N 41OON 4200N 4300N 4400N

l______l______l______l______l______l______l______l______l______l______l______l

en en en en - en Ln en en. en en en en. -f*. en en en-en -^. en en - -J en "-J -j . Go OQ CD oa-ca

l l l \ \ \ \ l l \ \ \

3300N 3400N 3500N 3600N 3700N 3800N 3900N 4000N 41OON 4200N 4300N 4400N

-O

—-100

- -200

-300

--400

--500

•--600

50Scale 1:5000

50 100 150 200 250 3005S-ES (metres)


MICHAUD TWP. ON

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEYREALSECTION L96+50E

AB^SOO to 4000 metersTransmitter Frequency 0.0625 Hz ( 5Q7o d uty cycle) Transmitter Current 2.6-4.8 Amps Decay Curve: QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows






Tx = PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) + M G-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed A Processed by:

QUANTEC IP INC.DWG. f: P-190-RSIP-96+50E

geophysical survey logistical report · uj uj uj uj-* cv ci c^ ,cj] 3 lo d ^ l-1 ^ l k) ^•^ f...

Documents