george washington2

Upload: houssamou

Post on 03-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 George Washington2

    1/6

    He did not actively participate in cabinet meetings, leaving debate to his ministers,

    whose opinions he occasionally requested in writing.

    "). almost Knox always slavishly sided with the treasury secretary, Jefferson usuallydisagreed with both

    , a large debt, worthless paper money, and, in effect, a bankrupt and weak Union.

    Major problems, old and new, urgentlyrequired solutions.

    Great Britain continued to refuse to relinquish its posts in the American West; and

    there was only a minuscule army and no navy at all. Virtually every effort of theadministration to settle these difficulties constituted a precedent

    In the process of establishing precedents, Washington proved to be an uncommonly

    able executive. "In his daily administrative tasks," Leonard D. White, a distinguished

    authority on American public administration, commented, "he was systematic,

    orderly, energetic, solicitous of the opinion of others but decisive, intent upon general

    goals and the consistency of particular actions with them." Washington, in sum,

    demonstrated his mastery of administrative detail and reserved for himself the final

    say in major affairs of state.

    During his first administration, Washington's department heads also played an active

    role in advising Congress on legislative policy.This was particularly true of the

    secretary of the treasury.Although the House was unwilling to allow Hamilton to

    appear before it in person, he nevertheless exercised instrumental legislative

    leadership. This included the submission of written reports and the use of influence

    over members of congressional committees. But the trend toward executive

    leadership of Congressespecially as exercised by Hamiltondrastically changed

    during Washington's second administration. The alteration was not due to revised

    views of Washington or his ministers on presidential leadership but rather to

  • 7/28/2019 George Washington2

    2/6

    Congress' less friendly response, which was, in turn, tied in with the gradual

    development of political parties, the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans.

    the provision of a bill of rights; and the enactment of tariff legislation.

    In one conspicuous instance, Congress also enhanced the powers of the presidency.

    James Madison of Virginia, one of the ablest and most influential members of the

    House of Representatives, sought to deprive the Senate of any claim to veto executive

    dismissals, by moving that department heads could be removed by the presidentsolely on his own authority. The House approved Madison's motion, but the Senate

    was less easily persuaded. The vote on the resolution was a that was broken by its

    presiding officer, Vice President John Adams, in favor of exclusive executive

    authority. An important source of presidential power was thus established, although

    the silence of the Constitution on the subject led to a century and a half of sporadic

    controversy concerning it.

    during his eight years in office, Washington, adhering to his resolve that the

    separation of powers required him to pursue a hands-off policy toward Congress,

    vetoed only two comparatively minor pieces of legislation.

    . In appointing Hamilton, Washington, on whose staff the young New Yorker had

    served during the Revolution, realized that he was tapping the best financial talent

    the country could offer.

    The president's satisfaction was the greater because he properly perceived that the

    Treasury Department would be the nerve center of the new government. Fiscal

    ineptitude had been chiefly responsible for the series of events that had toppled the

  • 7/28/2019 George Washington2

    3/6

    Confederation and led to the adoption of the Constitution. Among the most

    important provisions of that document was the pledge that "all debts contracted and

    engagements entered into before the adoption of the Constitution shall be as valid

    against the United States under this Constitution as under the Confederation." Themost pressing problem of the new government was the fulfillment of this pledge, and

    it fell to Hamilton to propose the ways and means.

    On 25 February, Washington signed the bill chartering the Bank of the United States.

    sectional conflict between slaveholders and other agrarians of the South versus

    mercantile and related commercially oriented interests of the North.

    Washington supported Hamilton's program because he believed that it would benefit

    all sections by promoting national prosperity and a more closely knit union. The

    restoration and firm establishment of public credit, moreover, was a means to the

    same goal. (which horrified Jefferson)

    administration was actually run by Hamilton

    As article after article appeared, Hamilton's attack on the secretary of state became

    increasingly shrill.

    both, pleading with them to subordinate personal antagonism to the national

    interest.

    During his first term in office, Washington's principal diplomatic difficulties

    concerned the Indian tribes, Great Britain, and Spain. The most immediate menace

    to national security came from Native Americans, who roamed and largely controlled

    the western frontier. Had they been able to effectively deploy their manpower and

    exploit their skill in guerrilla warfare, they would have presented an even graver

    danger, one that the sparsely manned American military forces could not have readily

  • 7/28/2019 George Washington2

    4/6

    parried. But individual Indian tribes often appeared more intent on fighting

    each other than the white man, on whom they also were hazardously

    dependent for guns and gunpowder. For their protection and security

    they acquired them by playing the three contending North Americanempires against each other. Of these, Native Americans most trusted

    Spanish Louisiana and British Canada and most distrusted the United

    States. The former two not only supplied them with munitions but were also less

    interested in seizing territory than in pursuing the mutually profitable fur trade;

    fellow Americans in the United States were less interested in trading with the natives

    than in acquiring their lands, often by treaties fraudulently obtained.

    Although the Spanish attempted to block U.S. expansion in the Southwest bynegotiating profitable trade alliances with Indian tribes that served as a buffer against

    attempts of the United States to seize Louisiana and to open the Mississippi River to

    its commerce, the British posed the greater threat to the new nation's sovereignty.

    The northwestern frontier was the scene of seemingly endless warfare between Native

    Americans (aided and abetted by their British allies) and American frontiersmen

    (intent on retaliation against murderous assaults on U.S. settlements in the West).

    The crux of the problem, as the United States saw the matter, was that redcoats of His

    Majesty's Canadian regiments still occupied seven forts in the Old Northwest, posts

    that England had by the terms of the 1783 peace treaty ceded to the United States.

    England justified its refusal to abide by this provision of the treaty by pointing to

    stipulations that the United States had failed to honor: the repayment of

    revolutionary debts due to British merchants and the return of Tory property.

    Britain's true reason for holding on to the forts was to safeguard the route along

    which Indian furs were shipped to Canada.

    Washington did not immediately perceive the nature and extent of British

    machinations in the West. When he belatedly did so, he swiftly asked

    Congress to enlarge the small regular army by one regiment. That

    done, he decided in 1791 to restore peace to the area by sending a punitive expedition

    against the warring tribes. Commanded byGeneral Arthur St. Clair, the army

    advanced from Fort Washington into present-day Indiana. On 4 November, St. Clair's

    forces were, despite Washington's warnings about such an eventuality, ambushed and

    humiliatingly defeated by a confederated Indian army. Although he was charitably

  • 7/28/2019 George Washington2

    5/6

    exonerated by Washington as well as by a committee of the House of Representatives,

    St. Clair resigned his commission. The United States Army, reorganized and enlarged,

    was now placed under the command of General Anthony Wayne, a leading

    Revolutionary War commander. During 1792 and 1793, Wayne postponed an activecampaign while he patiently instructed his troops in the tactics of forest warfare.

    In the meantime,Washington took the initiative in another type of training

    program by seeking to convince Congress and the state governments that

    the solution to the problem of Indian-American relations was not war but

    a change in attitude and the resultant adoption of policies that would

    assure justice to Native Americans. The murder of a Native American, for

    example, should be judged as the murder of a white person, measuresshould be taken to protect natives' property, and "such radical

    experiments . . . as may from time to time suit their condition" should be

    launched in order that Indians might gradually be integrated into U.S.

    culture. The period was not auspicious for the acceptance of such ideas,

    particularly in view of the persistence of Native Americans in conducting

    savage raids against U.S. settlers on the frontier.

    For Washington, a more immediate and personal problem was the approaching

    presidential election of 1792. Early in his first administration he had made the

    decision to retire at the end of a single term, and wishing above all else "to return to

    the walks of private life," he balked at reversing it, the more so since for the moment

    the foreign scene appeared serene and domestic developments, particularly the

    success of Hamilton's economic program, gratifying. But would the rift in his official

    family oblige him to reconsider his earlier decision to retire? Pressure to do so

    crowded in from every quarter, from north and south, from private citizens and

    official colleagues. Among the latter, none were more importunate than the principal

    rivals of his cabinet, who suspended their acrimonious disagreement on everything

    else political to urge the president to stand for reelection.

    Neither Hamilton's nor Jefferson's pleas, nor those of many other prominent

    Americans, had any effect on the president's unwillingness to announce his candidacy

    for reelection. Nevertheless, over the months following his return to Philadelphia

    from Mount Vernon in October 1792, Washington continued to remain mute.Predictably no rival candidate presented himself, and there was not even a whisper

  • 7/28/2019 George Washington2

    6/6

    that one would. Aware that he was in a field of one, Washington certainly knew that

    the electorate would take his silence for assent, and it did. On 13 February 1793 the

    electoral college unanimously elected him to a second term. His running mate, John

    Adams, was also returned to office, although by a vote of only seventy-seven to fifty.To Washington, now past sixty and in poor health, what others saw as an electoral

    triumph was rather another four-year sentence to what he described to Jefferson as

    "the extreme wretchedness of his existence."