geosyntec consultants

129

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jun-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 2: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 3: Geosyntec Consultants

Geosyntec Consultants

Interface.xlsx

REF PEAK LARGE DISPLACEMENTTESTED COMPONENTS SHEAR TEST

RATE No. 5 5 15 15 24 24 5 5 15 15 24 24 n Friction n FrictionAngle Angle

700 700 2,100 2,100 3,500 3,500 700 700 2,100 2,100 3,500 3,500 Shear Stress Shear Stress

Phase I (psi) ( o ) (psi) ( o ) (psi) ( o ) (psi) ( o ) (psi) ( o ) (psi) ( o ) (psf) ( o ) (psf) ( o )Gravel/24 oz Geotextile/60 mil HDPE/Mar. Clay @ 0.04 in/min C1 3.1 32.6 8.8 31.1 12.9 28.0 2.3 25.4 7.7 27.8 10.9 24.1 131 27 77 24Gravel/24 oz Geotextile/60 mil HDPE/Blk Crk Clay@ 0.04 in/min C2 2.5 27.4 6.9 25.2 8.7 19.6 2.4 26.5 6.4 23.7 8.2 0.1 203 18 196 16

Notes:(1) Apparent friction angles are calculated by taking the arctan of shear stress /normal stress.(2) Large displacement shear strength using the shear force at the end of the test.

TABLE 1

ONONDAGA LAKE SEDIMENT CONSOLIDATION AREACamillus, NY

SUMMARY OF STRESSES SUMMARY OF RESULTSPEAK RESIDUAL

Normal Stress (psi) Normal Stress (psi)

Normal Stress (psf) Normal Stress (psf)

Page 4: Geosyntec Consultants

Shear Strength δ aParameters(3) (deg) (psf)Peak 27 130 0.991LD 24 75 0.978

Test Shear Normal Shear Drainage Gravel Clay FailureNo. Box Size Stress Rate Stress Time Stress Time γd ωi ωf γd ωi ωf ωi ωf τP τLD Mode

(in. x in.) (psf) (in./min) (psf) (hour) (psf) (hour) (pcf) (%) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) (%) (psf) (psf)1A 12 x 12 700 0.004 - - 700 24 - - - 102.8 21.7 20.5 - - 447 332 (1)1B 12 x 12 2100 0.004 - - 2100 24 - - - 102.5 22.1 20.1 - - 1268 1107 (2)1C 12 x 12 3500 0.004 - - 3500 24 - - - 102.6 21.9 19.0 - - 1862 1565 (2)

DATE OF REPORT:FIGURE NO.PROJECT NO.DOCUMENT NO.FILE NO.

C-1SGI11017

7/31/2011

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS - ONONDAGA SCA PHASE 1INTERFACE DIRECT SHEAR TESTING (ASTM D 5321)

ConsolidationSoaking GCL Shear Strength

0

800

1600

2400

3200

4000

0 800 1600 2400 3200 4000Normal stress (psf)

Shea

r St

reng

th (p

sf)

PeakLDLinear (Peak)Linear (LD)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

0.0 0.8 1.6 2.4 3.2Displacement (in.)

Shea

r Fo

rce

(psf

)

1A 1B 1C

R2

Upper Shear Box: Drainage gravel nominally compacted/ GSE 240E (24 oz) nonwoven geotextile #130401943 with heart-treated side up/GSE 60-mil textured HDPE geomembrane # 102158865/Lower Shear Box: Marcellus clay #LP-087compacted to approximately 95% of max standard Proctor density at 3% wet of OMC (OMC = 19.5%)

NOTES:(1) Sliding occurred at the interface between the geotextile and geomembrane.(2) Sliding occurred at the interface between the geomembrane and clay.(3) The reported total-stress parameters of friction angle and adhesion were determined from a best-fit line drawn through the test data. Caution should be exercised in using these strength parameters for applications involving normal stresses outside the range of the stresses covered by the test series. The large-displacement (LD) shear strength was calculated using the shear force measured at the end of the test.

S11017-21.ds.xls

Page 5: Geosyntec Consultants

Shear Strength δ aParameters(2) (deg) (psf)Peak 18 205 0.946LD 16 195 0.952

Test Shear Normal Shear Drainage Gravel Clay FailureNo. Box Size Stress Rate Stress Time Stress Time γd ωi ωf γd ωi ωf ωi ωf τP τLD Mode

(in. x in.) (psf) (in./min) (psf) (hour) (psf) (hour) (pcf) (%) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) (%) (psf) (psf)2A 12 x 12 700 0.004 - - 700 24 - - - 97.1 24.7 23.4 - - 363 349 (1)2B 12 x 12 2100 0.004 - - 2100 24 - - - 97.4 24.4 23.7 - - 989 923 (1)2C 12 x 12 3500 0.004 - - 3500 24 - - - 97.6 24.1 23.2 - - 1249 1175 (1)

DATE OF REPORT:FIGURE NO.PROJECT NO.DOCUMENT NO.FILE NO.

C-2SGI11017

7/31/2011

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS - ONONDAGA SCA PHASE 1INTERFACE DIRECT SHEAR TESTING (ASTM D 5321)

ConsolidationSoaking GCL Shear Strength

0

800

1600

2400

3200

4000

0 800 1600 2400 3200 4000Normal stress (psf)

Shea

r St

reng

th (p

sf)

PeakLDLinear (Peak)Linear (LD)

0

400

800

1200

1600

2000

0.0 0.8 1.6 2.4 3.2Displacement (in.)

Shea

r Fo

rce

(psf

)

2A 2B 2CR2

Upper Shear Box: Drainage gravel nominally compacted/ GSE 240E (24 oz) nonwoven geotextile #130401943 with heart-treated side up/GSE 60-mil textured HDPE geomembrane # 102158865/Lower Shear Box: Black Creek clay #LP-088 compacted to approximately 95% of max standard Proctor density at 3% wet of OMC (OMC = 22%)

NOTES:(1) Sliding occurred at the interface between the geomembrane and clay.(2) The reported total-stress parameters of friction angle and adhesion were determined from a best-fit line drawn through the test data. Caution should be exercised in using these strength parameters for applications involving normal stresses outside the range of the stresses covered by the test series. The large-displacement (LD) shear strength was calculated using the shear force measured at the end of the test.

S11017-22.ds.xls

Page 6: Geosyntec Consultants

Figure 1. Sliding at the interface between the geomembrane and clay #LP-088 (Test #2B at 2100 psf).

Figure 2. Deformed top surface of the geomembrane at the completion of Test #2C at 3500 psf.

Shear displacement between the geomembrane and clay

Page 7: Geosyntec Consultants

Figure 3. . Top surface of the clay at the completion of Test #2C at 3500 psf.

Figure 4. Deformed top surface of the geomembrane at the completion of Test #1C at 3500 psf.

Clay #LP-088

Page 8: Geosyntec Consultants

Figure 5. Top surface of the clay at the completion of Test #1C at 3500 psf.

Figure 6. Sliding (shear failure) at the interface between the geotextile and geomembrane (Test #1A at 700 psf).

Clay #LP-087

Page 9: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 10: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 11: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 12: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 13: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 14: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 15: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 16: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 17: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 18: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 19: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 20: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 21: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 22: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 23: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 24: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 25: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 26: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 27: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 28: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 29: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 30: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 31: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 32: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 33: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 34: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 35: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 36: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 37: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 38: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 39: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 40: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 41: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 42: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 43: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 44: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 45: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 46: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 47: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 48: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 49: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 50: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 51: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 52: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 53: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 54: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 55: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 56: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 57: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 58: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 59: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 60: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 61: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 62: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 63: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 64: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 65: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 66: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 67: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 68: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 69: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 70: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 71: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 72: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 73: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 74: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 75: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 76: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 77: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 78: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 79: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 80: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 81: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 82: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 83: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 84: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 85: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 86: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 87: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 88: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 89: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 90: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 91: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 92: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 93: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 94: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 95: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 96: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 97: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 98: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 99: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 100: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 101: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 102: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 103: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 104: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 105: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 106: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 107: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 108: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 109: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 110: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 111: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 112: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 113: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 114: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 115: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 116: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 117: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 118: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 119: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 120: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 121: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 122: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 123: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 124: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 125: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 126: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 127: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 128: Geosyntec Consultants
Page 129: Geosyntec Consultants