geosynthetics engineering: in theory and practice · 95 (geotextile) ≥ 3 d 15 (soil) for c u > 3...

54

Upload: others

Post on 30-Jan-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

    Prof. J. N. Mandal

    Department of civil engineering, IIT Bombay, Powai , Mumbai 400076, India. Tel.022-25767328email: [email protected]

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Module - 4LECTURE- 16

    Geosynthetics for filtrations, drainages and erosion control systems

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Introduction

    Mechanism of filtration function

    Geosynthetics filtration and drainage criteria

    Geosynthetic drainage applications

    Subsurface drainage

    Recap of previous lecture…..

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Example: Site conditions: Less critical condition. Stoneriprap slope protection with geotextile needed.

    Step 1: Determine grain size distribution of soil

    D60 = 0.18, D10 = 0.040, D85 = 0.40, D15 = 0.05

    Step 2: Determine retention criteria

    5.404.018.0

    DD

    C10

    60u 4 ≤ Cu ≤ 8; B = 8/Cu = 8/ 4.5 = 1.78

    B D85 = 1.78 x 0.40 = 0.712 mm

    For retention criteria in steady flow condition to be satisfied,A.O.S or O95 ≤ 0.712 mm

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Step 3: Determine permeability criteria

    ksoil = (D10)2 = (0.04)2 = 1.6 x 10-3 cm/sec

    For less critical and less severe applications, kgeotextile ≥ 1ksoil

    Therefore, kgeotextile ≥ 1.6 x 10-3 cm/sec

    Step 4: Determine permittivity criteria

    For percent in-situ passing 0.075 mm sieve < 15%,

    Permittivity (Ψ) ≥ 0.5 sec-1 (AASHTO T88)

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Type Size (mm) Permeability (ks) (m/sec)

    Coarse Gravel 20 - 63 ~ 5 . 10-1

    Medium Gravel 6.3 - 20 ~ 1 . 10-1

    Fine Gravel 2.0 – 6.3 ~ 5. 10-2

    Coarse Sand 0.63 – 2.0 ~ 1 . 10-2

    Step 5: Selection of drainage aggregates

    Range of Coefficient of Permeability (ks) for materials ofdifferent sizes

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Step 6: Determine clogging criteria

    For less critical and less severe conditions,

    O95 (geotextile) ≥ 3 D15 (soil) for Cu > 3

    Here, Cu = 4.5 > 3

    Therefore, O95 ≥ 3 D15 ≥ 3 x 0.05 ≥ 0.15 mm

    Nonwoven geotextile: Porosity ≥ 50 %

    Woven geotextile: Percent open area ≥ 5%Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • DESIGNING FOR FILTRATION

    Geosynthetics can effectively perform the filtration functionin different Civil engineering applications like retaining walls,pavement, erosion control, silt fence etc.

    In a conventional rigid concrete retaining wall, water canpass through the vertical drainage layer to the under drainsystem or weep holes and consequently, development ofhydrostatic pressure behind the retaining wall can bereduced. However, drainage sand layer can become cloggedafter a passage of time causing the wall to collapse due togeneration of high hydrostatic pressure.

    The problem can be overcome by providing geosyntheticsbehind reinforced concrete wall or using gabion wall(consisting of wire baskets filled with stones of 100 mm size).

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Step 1: Draw the flow nets behind retaining wall. Determinequantity of flow using the following equation,

    q = Flow rate (m3/ sec/ m), k = Permeability of soil (m/sec)

    Δh = head lost (m), Nf = Number of flow lines, and

    Nd = Number of potential lines

    Geosynthetic design for filtration:

    d

    f

    NNhkq

    The major criteria for filtration is the cross-plane permeabilityand apparent opening size of geosyntetic.

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Step 2: Determine required permittivity or cross planepermeability

    When water passes perpendicular or across the plane of thecandidate geosynthetics, it is called permittivity or cross planepermeability.

    Concept of cross plane permeabilityProf. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • From Darcy’s equation,

    q = kn. i. A = kn. (h/tg). A

    Ψ = permittivity (sec-1)

    q = flow rate calculated using flow net (m3/sec) ,

    kn= hydraulic conductivity (Normal to geosynthetic) (m/s),

    A = area of geosynthetics = W x L (m2),

    h = head lost (m), and

    tg = thickness of geosynthetic (m)

    Permittivity (ψ) = h.A

    qtk

    g

    n

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Slope representation of permittivityProf. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Step 3: Determine the ultimate permittivity of geosynthetic(Ψult) from laboratory tests.

    Q = total water collected after time ∆t

    Hence, flow rate = q = Q/ ∆t

    A = cross-sectional area of geosynthetic = (W x L)

    kn = cross-plane permeability of geosynthetic

    tg = thickness of geosynthetic

    Permittivity (ψ) = h.A

    qtk

    g

    n

    a) Constant head method

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • f

    010

    g

    n

    hhlog

    tAa3.2

    tK

    a = area of stand pipe (m2)

    A = area of geosynthetic (m2)

    t = time change between h0 and hf (sec)

    h0 = head at beginning of the test (m)

    hf = head at end of the test (m)

    b) Falling head method

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Step 4: Determine the allowable permittivity of geosynthetic(Ψallow) using the following equation in case of flow relatedproblems (Koerner, 1995),

    ultallow

    ψψ = cum ulative reduction factors

    The range of recommended reduction factors depends onthe type of application (Koerner, 1995) such as,

    retaining wall, erosion control, pavement , landfill, gravity drainage, and pressure drainage etc

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Step 6: If the factor of safety is adequate, the candidategeosynthetics is acceptable, otherwise try a differentcandidate geosynthetic.

    Step 5: Determine the factor of safety (FS)A llow able perm ittivity of candidate geosyntheticF .S .R equired perm ittivity of candidate geosynthetic

    = allowreqd

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Step 7: Determine all parameters such as,

    Effective diameter of soil, d10 (mm)

    Coefficient of uniformity of the soil, Cu

    Coefficient of permeability of the soil (m/ sec)

    Relative density of soil (DR)%, and

    d85 (mm) from the grain size distribution curve of thesite specific soil

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Step 8: Check the required apparent opening size ofcandidate geosynthetics (AOS or O95reqd) to prevent thesoil loss based on the soil retention criteria.

    Four methods can be used for soil retention criteria:

    Task force 25 (1991) Carroll method, (1983) Giroud method (1982), and Luettich et al. (1992)

    Carroll method can be used for non-critical cases,whereas Giroud method can be used for critical case.

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Task force 25 (AASHTO, 1991)

    a) For particles ≤ 50 % passing the No. 200 sieve (0.075 mm),

    O95 ≥ No 30 sieve (0.60 mm)

    b) For particles > 50 % passing the No. 200 Sieve,

    O95 ≥ No. 50 Sieve (0.30 mm) Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Carroll Method (1983)

    This method can be used for noncritical cases.

    O95 < (2 or 3) d85

    i.e. O95 < 2.5 d85

    d85 = particle size at percentage finer of 85%

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Type of soilRelative

    density of the soil (DR)

    Liner coefficient of uniformity of the soil (Cu)

    1 < Cu < 3 Cu> 3Loose granular soil DR < 50 % O95< Cud50 O95

  • Luettich et al. (1992)Soil retention criteria for geotextile filter design understeady-state flow conditions

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • dx = the particle size of which x percent is smaller

    ID = relative density of the soil

    PI = plasticity index of the soil

    DHR =double-hydrometer ratio of the soil

    O95= geotextile opening size

    100

    02

    30

    60 10

    d

    d d

    u

    c

    dCd

    C

    d'100 and d'0 are the extremities of astraight line drawn through the particlesize distribution as directed above andd'50 is the midpoint of this line.

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Soil retention criteria for geotextile filter design underdynamic flow conditions. (After Luettich et al., 1992)

    60

    10u

    dCd

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Step 9: Determine the allowable apparent opening size ofgeosynthetics (O95 allow) from the laboratory sieve test.

    Step 10: Determine the factor of safety of geosyntheticagainst apparent opening size.

    9 5

    9 5

    F .S . req da c t

    OO

    Step 11: If the FOS is not adequate (i.e. opening size ofthe candidate geosynthetic is larger enough and fails toretain soil), try with another candidate geosynthetics. Itmust satisfy the permittivity and soil retention criteria.

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Step 12: Clogging criterion (long-term flow compatibility)

    Gradient ratio test (GRT) should be conducted.

    Check that gradient ratio ≤ 3.

    In that case, the geosynthetic is free from clogging.Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • I. Geosynthetics behind retaining walls

    In a conventional reinforced concrete retaining wall,granular soil is used as vertical drainage layer to allow thewater from backfill soil to the under drains or weep holes.

    Over the passage of time, sand drain may becomeexcessively clogged due to the retained backfill soil. As aresult, excessive hydrostatic pressure builds up in the backfillzone causing failure of the structure.

    A layer of geosynthetic filter, introduced at the back of theretaining wall, will retain the backfill soil and allow only waterto filter into the granular drainage layer.

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

    Applications:

  • Geosynthetic behind retaining wall for filtrationProf. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • A gabion wall is made of galvanized wire baskets filled withstones of size nearly 100 mm or larger stones. It is a flexiblewall with its free draining system. It also requires ageosynthetic filter at the back as shown in Figure below.

    Geosynthetic as filter behind gabion wall Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Giroud (1988) reported the typical hydraulic gradients:

    1) If the drainage is for embankment, road and slope etc,the hydraulic gradient will be less than one.

    2) If the drainage is for wall and trenches, the hydraulicgradient will be 1.5.

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Example:A flexible retaining wall of 4.5 m height is made of gabionwhich consists of 1 m × 1 m × 4 m baskets. It rests on a0.5 m × 2 m × 4 m mattress as shown below.

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Properties of silty sand

    Particle size finer than 85% = d85 = 0.12mm,Particle size finer than 50% = d50 = 0.06 mmEffective particle size = d10 = 0.02 mmRelative density =RD = 85%Coefficient of uniformity = Cu = 2.7Coefficient of permeability of soil (k) = 0.0065 m/sec

    Candidate Geotextile: (Non woven needle punched)

    Apparent opening size (A.O.S.) = 0.25 mmPermittivity of geotextile = Ψ = 1.1/secCumulative reduction factor (R.F.) = 12

    Check suitability of geotextile.

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Solution: Two stages of design

    Flow factor of safety

    Opening size of geotextile, i.e. retention criteria

    Step 1: Calculate actual flow rate using flow net.

    Flow factor of safety

    q = Flow rate, ksoil = 0.0065 m/sec,Δh = 4.5, Nf = 4, Nd = 5

    msec//m0234.0545.40065.0q 3

    d

    f

    NNhkq

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Step 2: Required permittivity of geotextile (Ψreqd)

    Lg

    nreqd A.h

    qtk

    q = 0.0234 m3/sec/m,

    kn = Coefficient of permeability normal to the geotextile

    Δh = Hydraulic head = 4.5,

    tg = Thickness of the geotextile, and

    AL = Area of geotextile per meter length= (4.5 × 1) m2

    13reqd sec1016.1)15.4(5.4

    0234.0

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Step 3: Allowable permittivity of geotextile

    Ψult = 1.1 /sec (Given)

    sec/092.012

    1.1.F.R

    ultallow

    qdRe

    allowS.F

    44.7800116.0

    092.0S.F

    Step 4: Factor of safety

    (Ok)

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Step 5: Geosynthetics opening size, i.e. retention criterion

    As it is not critical, apply Carroll’s criteria O95 < 2.5 d85.

    O95 = 0.25 mm

    2.5 d85 = 2.5 × 0.12 = 0.3 mm

    Hence, O95 < 2.5 d85

    Therefore, soil retention criterion is satisfied.Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • II. Geosynthetic filters around under-drains in high way

    Generally, crushed stones and/or perforated pipes areconventionally used as under-drains for filtration inhighways, railways and airfields. However, after apassage of time the under-drain systems become cloggeddue to seepage of water through native soil to the crushedstones.

    Therefore, layers of geosynthetics surrounding the stones/aggregates are to be provided to protect the aggregatesfrom fine soil contamination.

    Some applications of geosynthetics in under-drainswithout and with perforated pipe are shown here.

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Conventional aggregate drain with perforated pipe

    Geosynthetics around aggregates with perforated pipe

    Geosynthetic wrapped aggregate without pipe Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Use of geosynthetics in different pavement under-drains:

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Installation procedure of geosynthetics in under drain:

    Sequential procedure for under drain construction with geosynthetic

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Step 1: Excavate the sub grade soil to form a required sizeof trench as shown in Figure (a).

    Step 2: Place the geosynthetic such as there should notbe any void space behind the geosynthetic. Avoid any kindof folding or wrinkling on the geosynthetic as shown inFigure (b).

    Step 3: Place granular aggregates at the bottom of trenchas a bedding layer up to minimum 10 cm height before theplacement of perforated pipe or collector pipe (if required)as shown in Figure (c).

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Step 4: Remaining portion of the trench should be filledup with granular material under proper compaction asshown in Figure (d).

    Generally, compaction is done by vibratory equipment.The minimum compaction should be 95% standardproctor.

    Step 5: When compaction is over to the required depth ofthe trench, overlap the geosynthetic on the top of thegranular materials as shown in Figure (e).

    The minimum overlap should be 30 cm to 60 cm fordrain. The overlap helps to protect the drainage aggregatefrom surface contamination.

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Step 6: The remaining part (minimum 30 cm) of thetrench should immediately be filled up with looselyexcavated materials and compacted [Figure (f)].

    It is preferable not to expose the geosynthetic tosunlight, dirt or any kind of damage.

    Geosynthetics will prevent the soil from migrating intothe aggregates while allow the water to flow. Astransmissivity of open graded stones is adequate, thereis no need for a perforated pipe in the drainage system.

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Example: A geotextile filter is provided around theunder-drain in a highway. Design the geotextile filter.

    Geosynthetics around highway under-drainProf. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Size of drain = (350 mm x 550 mm)

    Δh = 500 mm

    Soil Properties:Coefficient of curvature, Cc = 1.8,Coefficient of uniformity, Cu = 4, Particle size finer than 50%, d50 = 0.03 mmRelative density, RD = 75%

    Geotextile properties:Apparent opening size, A.O.S. = 0.20 mmqult = 12 m3/day/mPermittivity = Ψ = 1.2/secCumulative reduction factor, R.F. = 20

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Solution:

    Permittivity criterion

    Step 1: Calculate required permittivity (Ψreqd)

    Lg

    nreqd A.h

    qtk

    q = Maximum flow rate coming from the top aggregates

    = 12 m3/day/m,

    Δ h = 0.5 m,

    AL = Area of geotextile per meter length = (0.35 x 1) m2

    /sec0.00079 =day/57.68135.05.0

    12reqd

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Step 2: Calculate allowable permittivity of geotextile

    Given, Ψult = 1.2 /sec

    Ψallow = (1.2/ R.F.) = 1.2 / 20 = 0.06 / sec

    qdRe

    allowS.F

    96.7500079.0

    06.0S.F

    Step 3: Factor of safety

    (Ok)

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Retention criterion

    Step 4: Apparent opening size of geotextile

    According to Luettich et al. (1992), under steady-state flowconditions for RD = 75 % and Cu = 4, we can write,

    O95 = Apparent opening size < 18 d50/ Cu

    18 d50/ Cu = 18 x 0.03/4 = 0.135

    Given, Apparent opening size (A.O.S.) = O95 = 0.20

    Therefore, F.S. = 0.135/ 0.2 = 0.675 (Not acceptable)

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • The candidate geosynthetic is not acceptable. Soil willnot be retained as opening size is too big. So, alternativegeosynthetics with tight pore structure is needed.

    As the permittivity factor is too high, tighter geosyntheticscan reduce the factor of safety for permittivity.

    Then both permittivity and retention criteria will be satisfied.

    Similarly, we can apply geosynthetics in the followingareas:

    • Geosynthetics as silt fences• Geosynthetics beneath erosion control structure

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Please let us hear from you

    Any question?

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  • Prof. J. N. Mandal

    Department of civil engineering, IIT Bombay, Powai , Mumbai 400076, India. Tel.022-25767328email: [email protected]

    Prof. J. N. Mandal, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay