geothermal convertion and economic
TRANSCRIPT
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 1/126
conomics
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 2/126
DISCLAIMER
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by anagency of the United States Government. Neither the United StatesGovernment nor any agency Thereof, nor any of their employees,makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legalliability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, orusefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or processdisclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privatelyowned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product,
process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, orotherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement,recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 3/126
DISCLAIMER
Portions of this document may be illegible inelectronic image products. Images are produced
from the best available original document.
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 4/126
I
ENERGY CONVERSION AN D ECONOMICS FOR
GEOTHERM AL POWER GENERA TION AT
HEBER, CA LIFO RNIA , VAL LES CA LDERA , NEW MEXICO,
A N D R A F T R IV E R , I D A H O - CASE STUDIES
EPRl ER-301
(Research Project 580)
Topical Report
2
November 1976
Prepared by c \ g 3 y
HO
T/PROCON
(A Joint Venture of The Ben Hol t Co. and Procon Incorporated)
201 South Lake Avenue
\
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 5/126
LEGAL NOTI CE
Thi s r epor t was pr epar ed by Hol t / Pr ocon (a J oi nt Vent ure of The Ben
Hol t
Co.
& Pr ocon I ncor por at ed) as an account
of
wor k s ponsor ed by
t he El ect r i c Power Resear ch I nst i t ut e , I nc . (EPRI ) . Nei t her EPRI ,
members of EPRI , Hol t / Pr ocon, nor any pers on act i ng on behal f of
e i t her : (a) makes any warr ant y or r epr esent ati on, expr ess or i mpl i ed,
wi t h r espect t o t he accur acy, compl eteness, or usef ul ness
of
t he
i nf ormati on cont ai ned i n t hi s r epor t , or t hat t he use of any i nf ormati on,
apparat us, method, or pr ocess di sc l osed i n t hi s r eport may not i nf r i nge
pr i vat el y owned r i ght s; or
(b)
assumes any l i abi l i t i es wi t h r espect t o
t he use
o f ,
or f or damages r esul t i ng f r omt he use of , any i nf ormat i on,
apparat us, method, or pr ocess di sc l osed i n th i s r eport .
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 6/126
ABSTRACT
This
repor t presents a porti on of t he re su lt s from a one-year study
sponsored by th e El ec tr ic Power Research In s t i t u t e
( E P RI )
to a ssess
the fea s ib i l i ty of cons truc ting a 25-50
MWe
geothermal power plant
using low-salinity hydrothermal fluids
as
the energy source.
The ove ral l objectiv e of the proj ect w a s t o assess th e tech nical , geo-
te ch ni ca l, environmental and economic f e a s i b il i ty of producing
el ec tr ic i t y from hydrothermal resources l ik e those known t o e xi st in
the Uni ted 'Sta tes . The object ive of th is repor t
w a s
to inves t iga te the
compat ib i l i ty
of
the di ff er en t power conversion options with re a l
geothermal re se rv oi rs and t o analy ze th e economics of power
generation.
Three sets of conversion technology are considered for the near term:
flashed steam, bina ry, and hybrid (flash ed steam/binary). Reservoir
and geothermal f lu i d cha ra ct er is tic s have a very s tro ng influ ence on
(1) th e choice of conversion technology, ( 2 ) performance and l i f e of
mate r ia l s and components,
( 3 )
necessary environmental co nt ro ls , and
(4) the ult im ate co st of generating power.
A l l
of th ese fac to rs are
in te rr el at ed , and th e decisio n logic fo r optimum choice has not ye t
been developed.
This re po rt di scus ses nine cases which were chosen t o yi el d f ur th er
i n s i g h t i n t o t he e f f e c t of res erv oir temperature on the choice of
convers ion technology and power co s ts . These ca se s examine fl as he d
steam, binary cycle and hybrid conversion for R a f t River, Idaho;
Heber, California; and Valles Caldera, N e w Mexico t h a t have bottom-
hol e temp eratu res of approximately 150
C , 180 C
and 260
C
res pe cti ve ly. Conceptual layo uts of th e power conversion proc esse s,
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 7/126
"Comparison of Hydrothermal Reservoirs in the Western United
Sta tes
"Reserv oir Engineer ing and Aspec ts of G eothermal Si te Select ion
at He ber , Cal i fornia and Val les C aldera , New Mexico ''
"Energy Conversion and Economics for Geothermal Po wer
Generat ion
at
Heber, California; V a l l e s Cald era, New Mexico;
and Raf t Riv er , Idaho
-
Case Studies ' '
"P re l im inar y Env i ronmenta l Ass essm ent of Geo thermal Power
Generat ion at Heber , California and V a l l e s Caldera, New Mexico"
"Geotechnical E nvironmenta l Aspec ts of Geothe rmal Power
Generat ion at Heber , Cali fornia"
I 'Socioeconomic Environmental Aspects of Geothermal Power
Generat ion
at
Heber
,
California"
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 8/126
c3
TABLE O F CONTENTS
S
UMMAR Y
Table 1 - Ene rgy Convers ion Study
INTRODUCTION
METHOD O F APPROACH
DESIGN CRITER IA
POW ER CONVERSION OPTIONS
SELECTION O F PLANT SIZE
HEAT REJE CTION OPTIONS
FLASHED STEAM PROCESS
THE BINARY PROCESS
THE HYBRID PROCESS
P a g e
1
8
9
11
13
16
18
20
25
27
HEBER CONVERSION PLA NT S 28
Draw ing No. 7523-D-3204B, Fla sh ed
Steam
P o w e r P l a n t 4 1
Draw in g No. 7523-D-3205A,
Binary Power P lan t 42
Dr aw ing No. 7523-D-3241A, Binary Powe r P lan t 43
Dr aw ing No. 7523-D-3208B,
Hybr id Powe r P lan t 44
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 9/126
P a g e
74
Table
3 -
Case Study Sum ma ry, Heber Res erv oir 76
Table 4 - Case S tudy Sum mar y , Val les Ca ldera Rese rvo i r 77
Table
2
-
Computer Sample Pr in tou t
Table
5 -
Case S tudy Sum mar y ,
Raf t R iver Reservo i r
ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY
Figure 5
-
E s t ima te S ummary , B ina ry
F igu re
6
- E s t i m a t e S u m m a r y , F l a s h
Figure 7 - E s t im a te S ummary , H ybr id
Figure 8 - Est im ate Sum mar y , B inary , P roduc t ion &
Injection
Table
6 -
Est imated Power P lan t and Transmiss ion
Table 7
-
Est im ated In i t ia l F ie ld Capi ta l Cos ts
Table 8
-
Est im ated F ie ld S taf f Cos t
Table 9
-
Est im ated F ie ld Operat ing and Main tenance
Table 10 - E s t ima ted P ow er P lan t L abo r C os t
Table 11 - Estimated Plant Operat ing and Maintenance
Table 12
-
Computer Pr in tou t
-
G eo the rma l P ro jec t
Table 13
-
E s t ima ted G eo the rma l P ow er C os t
-
Base
Table 14 - Sensi t iv i ty Analysis
-
G eo the rma l P ow er
Capi ta l Cos ts
c o s t
c o s t
E conomics
C a s e
78
79
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
106
107
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 10/126
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
O F
RECOMMENDATIONS
On the strength of this study, the Heber g eoth erm al f ield in California
i s r ecommended a s the bes t s i te fo r a low-sa l in i ty hydro the rm al
demon stra t ion plant .
power conversion sy st em should be based on the binar y cy cle, and the
cap aci ty of the pla nt should be in the 50 MWe range.
If a dem onstra t ion plant i s cons t ruct ed , the
SUMMARY O F CONCLUSIONS
1 .
2.
3 .
I t i s feasible to proceed with the des ign, construction and
operation of a 50 MWe hydroth erm al power plant with r easo nabl e
expectation of su cc es s, but not without som e tec hnica l and
e c on o mic r i s k s .
normal ly t ake
,
but i s acceptable as a "f i r s t -of-a-kind" re se ar ch
and development undertaking.
The risk is greater than what a uti l i ty might
Of the geo the rmal re se r vo i r s s tud ied in de ta il , demons t ra t ion
plants appe ar to be technically and environmentally feasible at
Heb er , Cal i fornia ; Val les Ca ldera , New Mexico and Raft Ri ver ,
Idaho; and economically feasible at Heber and Valles C ald era .
Heber i s the bes t a l l -around choice for the demonstra t ion s i te ,
because the character is t ics of the geothermal f lu id contained i n
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 11/126
7.
8 .
9 .
There ap pear to be no overr id ing environmenta l const ra in ts ;
however , pres ent data and analyt ica l techniques a r e not adequate
to fully evaluate sei sm ici ty, subsidenc e and hydrogeology
.
The
impact in each cas e is es t imated to be sma l l , and the es t im ate s
a r e thought to be conservat ive .
A comm erc ia l s i ze demons t ra t ion p lan t with a r es ea rc h and
development or ienta t ion dur ing the ear ly l ife
of
the plant, followed
by com me rcia l opera t ion af ter debugging is complete , i s needed to
reso lve the p rob lems of technology adaptation and optimization,
heat exchanger and turbine scale -up, ma ter ia l s , and scale control .
I t i s a l so needed to ve r i fy res e rv o i r pe r fo rmance mode ling
techniques and to study geotechnical environ mental a spe cts of
geot herm al product ion
.
Dry cooling and wet-dry cooling would impose a severe cost
penalty
i f
used .
S UMMAR Y OF
RESULTS
In October 1975, the Ele ct r ic P ower R ese arc h Ins t itu te author ized
Hol t /Pro con to make a feas ib i li ty s tudy for a low-sal in i ty hydrothermal
demonstra t ion plant .
economic and environmenta l feas ib i li ty in the 1980 t im e f ra m e and, i f
supported by the f indings, to recom me nd a si te for the construction
of
a 25 MWe to
50
MWe g eot her ma l power plant and a p ro ce ss upon which
to base the des ign.
The objective
of
the study was
to
a s s e s s t e c h n ic a l ,
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 12/126
power p lant pe r kw inc r eas es a t l eas t 50% over the cost
of
a plant
employing wet cooling.
It is concluded that a 50 MWe plant should be buil t, just ifie d on the
ba si s that the c ost of power fr om a s m al le r plant would probably not
be comp eti t i ve. The cost of power fro m a
2 5
MWe plant is expected
t o be 20% higher than the co st for a 50 MWe plant, resu lt ing in an
uneconomic installat ion.
The approach in determining technical and economic feasibil i ty was to
exam ine the th re e con version options at the thre e si te s (a total of nine
ca se s) a t a net power output level of
50
MWe, using wet cooling to w er s.
Net power i s the genera tor output le ss the paras i t ic power r equ ired
for pum ps and cooling tow ers , but excluding the power req uir ed to
pump and re i n jec t the geotherm al flu ids .
Conceptual engineering design work was ca rr ie d out - for each of the
n ine base c ase s as a bas i s upon which to p repare rea l i s t i c e s t i ma tes
of the capital cost for eac h ca se , for the power plant, the field
ins ta l l at ion and the t r ans mi ss io n l ines .
In th is s tudy deta i led capi tal cos t es t im ate s were prep ared for the fie ld
p lan t and t ran sm iss io n cos t s a t Heber .
adjus ted for the Val les Cald era and Raf t River ca ses to ref lec t d i f ferences
in des ign and locat ion.
opera t in g and maintenance cost es t im ate s for f ie ld , p lant and t r an s-
mi s s i o n l i n e s .
These es t im a tes were then
This work was followed by the preparation of
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 13/126
Brin e flow at the s ta r t
is
in the ran ge of 1. 2 M k g/h r to 1 . 8 M kg /hr
( 2 . 6 to 4 .0 M lb s / h r ) a t Va l les Ca ld e ra depend ing upon the p roc ess .
The flows a t Heber vary f r om 3. 1 M k g / h r t o 4 .5 M k g / h r
( 6 . 9
to
10 M lb s / hr ) , while a t Raft River the f lows vary f ro m 5 M kg/hr to
7 . 4 M k g / h r ( 1 1 .
0
to 16. 3 M l b s / h r ) .
The lea s t number of producing and injec tion wel ls a r e re quire d a t
Valles Cald era (13 -17) , fo l lowed by Heber (18-24) and by Raft R iver
(25-37) .
Brine consumption is lowes t fo r the b ina ry p roce ss a t a l l th ree
re se rv o i r s . Br ine flow i s lowes t
at
Valles Caldera , 24 kg/kwh
(52 lbs /kwh ) , inc reas ing to 63. 2 kg/kwh (139 lbs /k wh ) at Heber and to
100 kg/kwh ( 2 2 0 lbs /kwh ) a t Raf t R iver .
b ina ry and s team f lash b r ine consumpt ion inc re ases a s the re se rv o i r
t e m p e r a t u r e d e c r e a s e s .
The difference between
Pa ra s i t i c power consumpt ion fo r thk s team f lash ca ses v a r ies f ro m
670 to 12% of net power output a s com pare d to
a
range of 27% to 3570 fo r
the b inary cycle .
Fie ld development cos ts for the b ina ry and f lashed s t eam plants
( including wel ls , pumps and surfa ce ins ta l la t ion s) a r e lowest a t Heber
($236 /kw and $287/kw ) reflecti ng the relat ively high fluid production
p e r wel l and re la t ively low wel l cos t .
Cor respond ing cos t s
at
Valles
Ca lde ra a r e $336/kw and $406/kw and at Raft Riv er $590/kw and
$845/kw. The bina ry f ie ld cost s ar e consis tent ly lower than the
f lashed s team cos t s .
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 14/126
1.
2.
3 .
4.
5.
6 .
7.
8.
9.
P r o j e c t l i f e - 25 y e a r s .
D C F ra te of re tu rn to the produ cer , based on the c ost of f ie ld
development - 1570.
Depletion (22700)and write-o ff of intangible dri l l ing c os ts taken into
a ccount.
Royalty. - 12. 570of fuel cost.
Ad v a l o r e m t a x es - 10. 070of pro du cer 's fuel cos t and 2.
570
of
ut i l i ty 's capi ta l cos t .
Ut il i ty r e t ur n on investm ent
-
1270.
Fif ty-f i f ty u t i l i ty debt /equi ty ra t io .
Ut il ity in te res t r a t e
-
970.
Inves tment tax c red i t of 1070.
The projec ted co st of power at Valles Caldera i s probably unders ta ted
because we as sum ed , l ack ing spec i f i c in fo rmat ion to the con t ra r y ,
that cool ing wa ter could be made avai lable a t a min imal cos t , tha t the
noncondensable content of the res er vo ir f luid wa s nominal, and that
the cor r os io n and sca ling ch arac te r i s t i c s of the b rine ' we re s imi la r to
Heber .
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 15/126
Near t e r m al te rnat iv e new power avai lable in the Southwest wi l l
probably be based on e i ther coal- f i red o r o i l - f i red power p lants and
will c ost in the ra nge of 30-35 mil l s /kw h. I t appe ars that a 5 0 MWe
bina ry cycle p lant can be bui l t a t Heb er to supply power at
a
cos t
within this range.
T h e r ma l e f f ic i e nc i es ,
i. e. ,
he ra tio of ne t heat conve rted to el ec-
t r i c i ty t o h e a t e x t r a c t e d f r o m t h e b r i n e ,
do no t v a r y f r o m c a s e t o c a s e
n e a r l y a s much a s bri ne consumption.
Heber binary to 14.
86'30
fo r the Va l les Ca lde ra f l a sh case .
cas es the hybr id and f l a sh p ro ces ses a r e s l igh tly mor e e f fi c ien t than
t h e b i n a r y p r o c e s s .
at
a l o we r t e mp e r a t u r e t h a n t he f l a s h p r o c e s s , t h e r e b y mo r e t ha n
compensat ing for the los s in ef f ic iency.
The range i s 9.867' fo r the
In a l l
However , the b ina ry p ro ces s re je c t s spen t b r ine
Techn ica l weakn esses a r e a ssoc ia ted wi th the b ina ry cyc le and include
the l ack of exper ience in the des ign and opera t ion of la rg e hydrocarbon
expa nder s , pro ble ms asso cia te d wi th down-hole pumping which have
not been fully resolve d, and la ck of lon g-ra nge bri ne scalin g and
co rro s io n data. None of t h e s e c o n s t r a i nt s a p p e a r t o be of sufficient
magni tude to wa rr an t delay of des ign and constru ct ion of the power
plant.
T h e He b e r r e s e r v o i r me e t s a l l th e c r i t e r i a f o r f ea s ib i l it y .
good match fo r the re prese n ta t iv e low sa l in i ty re se rv o i r
a s
developed
in Geonomics ' work.
f o r
3 0
ye ar s o r more . The re a r e su f fic ien t da ta upon which to base
re l i ab le e s t im a tes of r e s e r vo i r s i z e and p roduc t ion charac te r i s t i c s .
I t i s a
It
is
la rg e enough to suppor t
a
200
MWe operation
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 16/126
The binary cycle p lant produces power
at
a lower cos t than the s tea m
f las h cyc le
at
Heber . Mo reove r , our s tudies show that the d i f ference
i n c r e a s e s a s r e s e r v o i r t e m p e r a t u re d e c r e a s e s .
The success fu l
dem onstr a t ion of a b inary cycle pr oc es s a t Heber wi l l be widely
a p pl ic a bl e t o t h e l a r g e me d i um t e mp e r a t u r e g e o t h e r ma l r e s o u r c e b a s e .
Th ere for e , we a lso recomm end that the conceptual des ign s tudies be
base d upon the b ina ry cyc le r a th e r than the f l a shed s te am cyc le.
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 17/126
THE RESERVOIR
R e s e r v o i r T e m p e r a t u r e , F
Producing Well Capaci ty ,
K
l b s l h r
No. of Wells , S tar t of Produc t ion
Injec t ion Well Capaci ty , K l h s l h r
No. of Wells , S tar t of Produc t ion
Product ion and Injec t ion Well Cos t . K
To ta l F i e ld C a p i t a l Co s t , M
O &M C o s t , F i e ld ,
K
/ y r
TH E PO W ER PLA N T
W e t B u lb Te mp e ra tu re , F
B r in e C o n s u mpt io n , M Ib s l h r , s t a r t
Ib s lk w h
B r i n e T e m p e r a t u r e , O u t, 'F
T h e r m a l E f f i c i en c y , 7
G e n e ra to r O u tp u t, k w
Pu mp in g W o rk , k w
Cooling Tow er Work, kw
N e t Po w e r , k w
Pla n t C o s t , M
Pla n t O &M C o s t .
K
/y r
TRANSMISSION COST, M
OVERALL COSTS
Fie ld D e v e lop me n t , / k w
P o w e r P l a n t , / k w
T r a n s m i s s i o n ,
1
kw
F u e l C o s t s , m i l l s / k w h
P l a n t F i x e d C h a r g e s , m i l l s l k w h
Pla n t O &M, mi l l s / k wh
T r a n s m i s s i o n C o s t , n , i l l s/ k w h
TOTAL POWER COST, mil l s /kwh
BINARY
360
650
12
1 , 3 0 0
6
300
1 1. 8
1,973
80
6. 942
139
154
11.75
64. 3
9 . 5
4 . 8
50 . 0
28. 5
1 , 2 0 0
0. 500
236
570
10
1 6 . 6 9
15.03
3.22
0. 28
3 5 . 2 2
TA B LE 1
ENERG Y CONVERSION STUDY SUMMARY
H EB ER
FLASH HYBRID
VALLES CALDERA
BINARY FLASH HYBRID
Isopentane
R A FT R IV ER
FLASH HYBRID
INARY
300
650
19
1.300
9
600
29. 5
2.953
65
11.00
220
145
9. 86
67 . 5
15. 9
1.
50 . 0
32. 3
1 , 3 3 1
3.600
590
646
72
32 .80
16.83
3.57
1.97
55.17
Note: M
=
mi l l i o n s a n d
K =
thousands
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 18/126
INTRODUCTION
This repor t
i s
one of the documents which has bee n pre par ed a s a pa r t
of the feas ibili ty study fo r
a
low sa l in i ty hydrotherm al dem onstra t ion
plant.
P a r t A of the study consist s of the as se ss m en t of the technical ,
econom ic and env ironmen tal feasib il i ty of
a
25
to
50
MWe plant in the
Heber a re a of the Im per ia l Valley and the Val les Cald era ar ea of New
Mexico, using state-of - t he -a rt technology.
Also inc luded in P a r t A i s a pa ra l l e l t echn ica l and economic (no t
envi ronm enta l) study of the Raft Riv er, Idaho, re se rv oi r , which we have
taken to be representa t ive of a low temperature 149
C
( 3 0 0 F ) r e s e r v o i r .
By se lec t ing Raft Rive r a s a r epre sent a t ive s i te in addi tion to the o ther
si tes, we have accomplished another objective:
i.
e. , the development
of the cap i ta l and opera t ing co sts associa ted wi th three d i f ferent
p r o c e s s e s at t h r e e r e s e r v o i r t e m p e r a t u r e s .
to be the ho tte s t r e s e rvo i r :
2 6 0
C (500 F ) , followed by He ber: 182 C
(360 F ) and then by Raft Rive r:
149
C (300
F).
Valles Caldera i s thought
The economic analys is resul t ing f r o m this work provides ins ight as to
the re la t iv e m er i t s of f lashed s te am and binary cycles wi th varying
res e rv o i r t em pera tu res and p rov ides use fu l in fo rmat ion re la t ing power
g e n e ra t io n c o s t s t o r e s e r v o i r t e mp e r a t u r e .
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 19/126
c
ASK 3 SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
The response to
this
t a s k
i s
contained in
a
sepa ra t e H ol t /P rocon r e po r t
entitled "Plant Requirements Manual".
TASK
4
ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY
The response to this t a s k
is
contained in th is report .
TASK 5 - ENVIRONMENTAL FEASIBILITY
The response to this t a s k i s contained in a sepa ra t e r epo r t p repa red by
Pr oc on (with input by Geonomics, Inc. , en t i t led "Pre l iminary
Environmenta l As s
e
s srnent"
.
TASK
6
- RESERVOIR SE LECTION
A l l of the foregoing r ep or ts including this one pres en t data which affect
the selec tion of
a
r e s e r v o i r .
per t inen t fac to r s a f fec ting re ser vo i r se lec tion , toge ther with a
recommended reservo i r se lec t ion .
T h i s r epo r t p re sen t s an ana ly s i s
of
the
TASK 7 - IDENTIF ICATION O F TECHNOLOGY WEAKNESSES
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 20/126
M E T H O D O F A P P R O A C H
The method of appr oach in conducting the en erg y convers ion s tudy i s
a s fo llows:
1.
Avai lab le da ta we re as sem bled fo r each s i te and , when not
ava i lab le , reasonable es t imates w er e made. Such data included:
a.
b.
R ese rvo i r t em pe ra tu re and chemica l compos it ion .
Noncondensable content and anal ysi s of re se rv oi r f luid .
c.
d. Well prod uctiv ity, depth, spacing and cost.
Corr os ion and sca l ing cha rac te r i s t i cs of the res e r vo i r f lu id .
e.
Me teo ro logica l da t a , p r i ma r i ly w e t and d ry bu lb t em pe ra t u re
of air.
f .
Pl an t locat ion and elevat ion.
g. Soil conditions.
h. Applicable bui lding code s, including envi ronm ental controls .
i.
Availability and cost of util i t i es.
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 21/126
Plo t p lan
Major equipment specif ica t ions
Electr ica l s ingle- l ine drawings
This w as done both fo r the f ield and the plant instal lat ions.
4. Vendors ' quota t ions w er e sought fo r
all
m aj or equipment. We
evaluated the offer ings and made equipment se lec t io ns which w er e
incorpora ted on the P& I d iagrams . The cos t quota tions we re used
in es t imat ing.
5.
The foregoing documents wer e turned over to the es t i ma tor s who
prepared ins ta l l ed cos t e s t ima tes .
supplemented by our es t im ate s of opera t ing costs , we re used in the
est im ate of the c ost of power d elive red to a load center .
The cap i ta l cos t e s t im a tes ,
6.
Next a c om pute r pr o gr am was developed, the output of which was
t he cos t
of
ge o t h e r m a l pow e r d e l i ve r e d t o a loa d c e n t e r .
pr og ra m computed the se l l ing pr ic e of ener gy to the u t i l ity u t il iz ing
the cos t-o f - se rv ice approach in accordan ce with genera l ly accep ted
pra ct i ce in the o i l industry . The cost of conv ers ion was ca lcula ted
employing the methods genera l ly used by the investor-owned publ ic
ut il i ty . The cost of power wa s es t im ated for all nine cases ,
and a
sensi t iv i ty ana lys is pe rfo rm ed to evaluate the effec t of changing
key variables.
T h e
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 22/126
POWER
CONVERSION OP TIONS
The con vers ion of hydr o ther mal energy f r om a l iqu id-dominated
geo the rma l r e so u rc e in to e l ec t r i c pow er can be accompl i shed by the
fol lowing meth ods:
T he f l a s he d s t e a m p r o c e s s - in which a pa rt of the geo the rm al f lu id
i s
f l a shed into s t eam in one o r m or e s t ages .
duce e lec t r ic power by mea ns of a tu rb ine and gene ra tor .
T he s t e a m
i s
u s e d t o p r o -
T he b i n a r y p r o c e s s
-
i n w hich the the rm a l ene rgy in the b r ine
i s
t r a n s fe r r ed in to a p re s su r i ze d in t e rmed ia t e f lu id , such a s i sobu tane ,
which
i s
expanded through a turb ine to prod uce power.
then condensed and pumped up to i€ s in i t ia l p re ss ur e
s o
that
it
can be
recyc led th rough the sys tem.
The fluid
i s
T he hybr id p ro ces s
-
in which
a
pa r t of the b r ine i s f lashed in to s tea m
which
i s
used to d r ive
a
s t e am tu rb ine. T he r e s idua l hea t i n the b r ine
i s t hen t r an s fe r r e d to a n in t e rmed ia t e f luid w h ich i s u sed to d r ive a
second tu rb ine us ing the b inary p ro ces s .
T o ta l f low p ro ces se s S eve ra l
of
t he se p roc es s e s a r e under deve lop -
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 23/126
c
h e ma j o r t e c hn i c al p r o b l e ms a s s o c i a te d wit h t he s t e a m f l a s h p r o c e s s
have to do with c or ro si on and H2S disposal .
successful ly control led by providing sui table ma ter ia l s of construct ion
fo r the turbines , cond ense rs and re la te d equipment . H2S control has
of ten been a p rob lem because the e a r l i e r p lant s have used ba r om et r ic
condense rs ra the r than su r face condense rs . In the fo rm er cas e much
of the H2S i s abso rbed in the cool ing wat er and re lea sed to the a tmo s-
ph er e in the cooling tower.
be achieved by using s urfac e c ondensers , in which ca se the H2S app ear s
in the d i sch arge
gases
f r o m t h e v a c uu mp u mp s a n d m a y b e r e mo v ed c o m-
plete ly by es tabli shed technology.
Cor ros ion has been
However, comp lete con trol of the H2S m ay
Th ere se em s to be no s ignif icant technical r is k involved in des igning
a
f l a shed s team p lan t , and we cons ide r the f l a shed s team proc ess to be a
prov en one.
T h e r e i s nothing new in the co ncept of emplo ying an org an ic fluid in a
clos ed Rankine cycle. Over
1 , 0 0 0
so-cal led "naphtha launches" were
bui l t in the la te 19th and ear ly 20th centur i es us ing petroleu m naphthas
a s a workin g fluid. The R.ussians a r e r e p o r t e d to have a smal l
750
kw
geotherm al un it in opera t ion employ ing Fr eo n a s a working fluid.
J a p a n a plant has been in opera t ion s ince 1967, recover ing was te heat
f r o m a pe t rochem ica l p lan t and genera t ing 3 . 8 MW of sh af t w or k by
expanding Fre on in a rad ia l inflow turbine .
te s t loop wil l soon be i n opera t ion in the Im per ia l Val ley.
In
A nominal
10
MW isobutane
Hydrocarbon expansion tu rb ines up to 10,000 hp have been in su cces s -
ful opera t ion worldwide, and the re ap pear to be no ser io us technical
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 24/126
expander and others) req u i re the p rac t ica l so lu t ion to many d i f ficu lt
p ro b le ms asso c ia ted wi th sca ling , cor ros i on and e ros io n of m eta l
p a r t s .
a r e l ike ly to be ready fo r c omm erc ia l iz a t ion wi thin the next two year s .
C lear ly , none of the tota l f low options a r e s ta t e-of - the -ar t o r
A modif ica tion of the b inary p r oc es s . in which a direc t -con tac t exchanger
i s subst i tu ted for the tubular exchanger
i s
under development by sev era l
f i rms
including The B en Holt
Go.
el iminat ing the prob lem of sca le bui ldup on tubular excha ngers and in
reducing capi ta l cos t by subst i tu t ing a re la t ive ly inexpens ive d i rec t -
contact exchanger for the tubular exchanger .
and economic feas ib i l i ty wi l l be demo ns t ra ted wi th in the next two year s .
This modif ica tion shows promi se i n
We expect that tec hni cal
Another modif icat ion of the binar y pr oc es s i s incorp ora ted in the des ign
of the Niland Te st Fac ilit y. Scaling of the hea t exc han ger s
i s
minimized
by f lash ing the b r in e
at
fou r succes s ive ly low er p re s su re s ,
scrubbing
the par t icu la te s f ro m the f lashed s tea m and hea ting the i sobutane
working fluid by condensing the f la sh s t ea m in tubular excha ngers .
The
m e r i t s of t h i s s cheme a r e planned fo r dem ons trat ion by the end of 1976.
We have l imi te d our s tud ies i n
this
r ep o r t t o the s t a t e -o f - the -a r t
options.
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 25/126
SELECTION O F PLANT SIZE
f
It
i s
c le ar tha t geo thermal power p lan ts come in re la t ive ly
small
s i z e s
a s compared w ith fo s s i l f ue l o r nuc lea r p l ant s .
ins tance , a module
i s
110 MWe and a t Ce r r o Pr ie to the in i t ia l ins ta l -
la t ion
i s
75 MWe (two 37.5 MWe s te am turb ine s).
t h i s
i s
an econom ic one.
col lect ion and re inject ion of the f luids incr ea se s
a s
mo re w e l l s (bo th
production and re inject ion) a r e required.
ene rgy lo s se s become g rea te r .
At The Geysers , fo r
T he ma in r ea s on fo r
A s single plants get la rg er , the co st of
A lso the f lu id t r an sm is s ion
Another reason
i s
a tech nical /econ om ic one. F o r example, no hydro-
carb on expansion turbin es have been buil t even in the 60-70 MWe range,
a l though the re a ppea r to be no se r io us techn ica l p rob lems assoc ia ted
with scaling up existing designs.
O r f o r t ha t m a t t e r ,
i f
capaci ty should
rea l ly t u rn ou t to be a l imi t ing fac tor , m ul tip le un i ts ma y be ins ta l led on
a c omm on shaft a t so me economic penalty .
In e i ther the
25
MWe or
50
MWe sizes of
a
binary cyc le p lant , we a r e
alr ead y deal ing with mult iple uni ts of m aj or equipment . F o r example,
the p re l im inary equ ipment se lec t ion
a t
Heber p rov ides fo r e ight ho t
wate r /wo rking f luid exchanger bundles , e ight condenser bundles , e ight
hydrocarbon pum ps, thr ee cooling water pumps and 10 to 12 cel ls in
the cooling tower.
A
25 MWe un it would have abou t one-half of the
numbe r of these units . Since individual exchangers , cond ense rs ,
pumps and cooling tower cel ls
a r e
a l r eady
as
l a r g e a s a r e r ea d il y
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 26/126
viab i li ty of power p roduct ion f r om low sa l in i ty medium tem per a tur e
hot w a te r r e se rvo i r s . Moreove r,
i f
the de mo nstr atio n plant could not
genera te e lec t r ic i ty economical ly , the re would be l i t t le incent ive to
keep it operat i ng beyond a rea son able te s t per io d without subsidizing
the operat ion. By con tras t , an economic operat i on would be self
support ing, would provide re al i s t i c co st data and would encourage
rap id development, not only of the res e r vo i r on which the p lan t i s
l oca ted bu t a l so o the r r e se r vo i r s .
Based on da ta p resen t ed in our economic ana lys is , we have es t im ated
the c ost of power fr om a
25
MWe binary plant a t Heber as compared to
a 50 MWe plant.
i s
about 35 .2 m i l l s /kw h.
42 .3 mil l s /kw h ,
an
i n c r e a s e of about 2070.
making
this
ca lcu la t ion a r e a s fol lows:
O ur ba se ca se e s t im a te fo r t he cos t of pow er a t H ebe r
The corresponding f igure fo r 25 MWe is
The assumptions used in
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6 .
Powe r p lan t cap i ta l cos t
i s
61% of
a 50
MWe plant.
Powe r p lant labor
i s
constant.
Power p lan t main tenance i s p ropor t iona l to cap i ta l.
P ow er p lan t, w a te r , chemica l s and misce l laneous cos t s a r e
propo rt ional to capi ta l .
T ransm is s ion cos t s a r e cons tan t.
One-half
as
many wel ls a r e d r i lled .
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 27/126
HEAT REJECTION OPTIONS
Heat re jec t ion pe r kwh f r om a geoth erma l power plant is higher than
tha t f rom a fos s i l fue l o r nuc lear power p lan t because the the rm al
eff ic iency is low er.
F o r example, the the rm al eff ic iency of the Heber
binar y cycle plant is about 1370, a s compared with a typical fo ss i l fuel
plant of 347'0,
and heat re ject ion p er kwh from the geo thermal uni t is
about 3 .44 t im es that of the fo ssi l fueled plant .
appa rent that the method and cos t of heat re ject ion is re la t ive ly a more
important considerat ion in the design of geotherm al power plants than
in
e i ther f oss i l fue led
o r
nuc lear p lan ts .
Moreover , because the hea t
s o u r c e is i t se l f a t a low temp era tur e ,
the efficiency
is
very sens i t ive
to the heat re ject ion tem per atu re . In the range of t empe ra tu re
of
in t ere st , the net work produced is roughly proport ional to the
tem per a tu re d i f fe rence be tween the hea t source and the hea t s ink .
Th ere a re thr ee proven heat re ject ion options avai lable:
w e t
cooling,
a i r cooling and a com bination.
Thus, it becomes
Typical ly , wet cooling towe rs can reduce the temp era tur e of the
rec i rc u la ted coo ling w ate r to wi thin
6
C (10
F )
of the pre vai lin g wet
bu lb tempera ture ,
which
is
typ ica lly a t le as t 11
C 2 0 F )
l e s s t ha n
the p reva i ling d ry bu lb tem pera tu re .
Dry coo ling sys tem s fo r hea t re jec t ion use f inned
heat
exchanger tubes
to t ransf e r the hea t f rom the p roce ss f lu id to the a tm osphe re . The
min imu m temp era tu re a t w hich the se sy s t ems can di s s ipa te hea t is
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 28/126
about $13, 000 ,000 .
para s i t i c power requ i reme nts in c rea se about 5 MWe.
given plant siz e, power output
i s
reduced about
20%
and cos t s inc rease d
about 20oJ0.
Thus, if the plant costs $500/kw with wet cooling,
i t
wil l cos t a t l eas t
$750/kw with d ry cooling.
The los s in cycle ef f ic iency i s about l o%, and the
Thus , fo r a
The net effect i s a 50% inc rea se i n the uni t cos t per kwh.
A s im i la r ana lys i s was made fo r a fl a shed s t eam sys tem .
a
c i rcu la t ing wa te r sys tem
i s
requ i red to t r ans f e r h ea t f ro m the con-
de ns er to the a i r cooler . The num bers come out about the sam e
- -
a reduct ion in cycle ef f ic iency, an incr eas e in pa ras i t i c power con-
sumpt ion and a sha r p inc re ase i n ins ta l l ed cos t pe r kw.
In th i s case ,
We did not continue o ur analy sis fur th er becaus e it app ears obvious
tha t a i r cooling i s
not a viable al tern ativ e to wet cooling, and neither
a r e combina tion coo le rs s ince they a r e even m or e cos t ly than a i r
coo lers. Mo reov er, we suspe ct that a definit ive study would show an
e v en g r e a t e r c o s t in c r e a s e .
The re i s one a l ternat ive which we did not examine because of t ime
l imita t ions .
t e mp e r a t u r e s a r e l ow.
say, 28
C (50
F ) and then examine the dai ly and se aso nal var ia t ion s in
power output which might result .
output would be gr ea te r than des ign and dur ing the s um m er months
le ss than des ign.
At Va l les Ca lde ra , fo r example , fo r much of the ye a r a i r
One migh t des ign fo r an a i r t em pera tu re o f,
During the winter months, power
The over a l l r esu l t might not be too bad.
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 29/126
FLASHED STEAM PROCESS
GENERAL
Thre e fac to rs s t rong ly a f fec t the p ro ces s des ign of f l a shed s tea m
geotherm al p lan ts .
They a r e a s fo llows:
1.
The tem pe rat ure and composi t ion of the geo ther ma l br in e .
2.
The cha ra ct er is t i cs of the avai lable heat s ink.
3 .
The s ize and the ch ara c te r i s t i c s of the tu rb ines ava i lab le fo r us e
wi th g e o t h e r m a l s t e a m.
The ini t ia l t em pera tu re of the re se rv o i r flu id de te rmin es both the
quant ity of s te am which can be f las hed f r o m
i t
and the tem pe rat ur e of
the resu l t ing s team.
f lashed. Our f l a sh calcula t ions a r e done with a c o mp ut e r p r o g r a m
which take s th is ef fec t in to account . Of the th re e geot her ma l f ie lds
under cons ide ra t ion in th i s r epo r t , the mos t concen t ra ted b r ine e x i s t s
a t Heber , abou t
15,000
p a r t s p e r mi ll io n .
f l a s h is reduced approx imate ly 39 0 by the d issolved sol ids .
Dissolved sol ids a l so affec t the amount of s t ea m
I n t h i s c a s e , t h e s t e a m
It
is
ususa l ly p rac t i c a l to f l a sh the reduced l iqu id
a
second t im e, us ing
the secondary s t eam in lower s tages of the tu rb ine .
i s poss ib le to f l a sh the b r ine a n in f in it e number of t im es ex t rac t ing
Theore t i ca l ly , it
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 30/126
the des ign we t bu lb t em per a tu re in each a rea .
The ov era l l e f f ic iency
of th e pla nt i s significantly improved
if
the tem pe ra tu re of the cooling
w a t e r i s low.
In a l l cas es we have ass ume d tha t adequa te makeup wa te r wi l l be
available to pe rm it the ope ratio n of wet cooling towers .
The f lashed
st ea m plant produc es ad equate quanti t ies of condensa te which can be
used f or cooling tower makeup water .
th i s condensate is a valuable commodity which would pe rm it a f l a shed
s t e a m p la n t t o o p e r a t e wh e r e
other
types
of
plants could not.
Where wa te r supp lies a r e shor t ,
STEAM TURBINES
A survey was made of four dom es t ic and two Japanese companies
thought ca pable of providing turbi nes fo r
this
se rv ice .
companies only one , Genera l E le c t r i c Company, expr esse d in t e re s t in
producing geothermal steam turbines in the 25-50
M W e
r a n g e . Of the
two Japanes e compa nies , Mitsubishi and Kawasaki , the long l ines
of
communica t ions to the i r eng ineering depar tments made it i mp r a c t i c a l
t o c a r r y o ut a cooperative study.
we re conducted maingly with the Ge neral Ele ct r ic Company.
Of the do me sti c
Accordingly , our turbine s tudies
Geoth ermal tur bine s o pera te under d i f ferent condit ions f r o m convent ional
power p lant turbines .
ind ica tes tha t depos i t s fo r m on the tu rb ine bucke ts ,
subject ing the
mach in es to m or e v ib ra t ion than those in convent ional se rv ice .
According ly , Genera l E le c t r i c uses ex t ra r ig id bucket s which a r e no t
Exper ience with The Ge yser s geo the rmal p lan t s
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 31/126
were done at a n u mb e r of p r i m a r y a n d s e c on d a r y s t e a m p r e s s u r e s
c h o s en i n r e l a ti o n t o th e i n i t i a l b r i n e t e mp e r a t u r e ,
m at r i x giving the amount of pr im ar y and the amount of second ary
st ea m produced a t ea ch combinat ion of f i r s t and second-s tage
p r e s s u r e s .
The resu l t was a
The second s tep was to ca lcu la te the approx imate s tea m f lows to
produce 55 MWe gr os s f r o m each of the s tea m f lash ca lcu la t ions
derived above.
s te am r a t es f o r each expans ion f r om a range of in i t i a l s t ea m condi tions
t o s e v e r a l c o nd en si ng p r e s s u r e s .
This w as done by
f i r s t
ca lcula t ing the theore t i ca l
The se w ere conver ted to "actual"
s te am ra t es by d ividing them by e s t ima te d tu rb ine e f f i c ienc ies .
It
then poss ib le to c a lcula te for each in i t ia l and f inal condi t ion, the
p r i m a r y a n d s e co n da r y s t e a m f lo w s f r o m
1000
pounds of brine and
resu l tan t e lec t r i ca l gene ra t ion .
Finally, by dividing
55
MWe by this l a st f igu re, we obtain
a
f a c t o r
bo th b r ine and s tea m flows.
wa s
the
f o r
F o r each p lan t, th i s ca lcula t ion was pe r fo rme d i n t abu la r f o r m f o r a
l a r g e ma t r i x of p r i m a r y s t e a m, s e c o n da r y s t e a m a n d c o nd en si ng
p r e s s u r es.
TURBINE SELECTION
Using the pre l im ina ry ca lcula t ions a s a guide, GE turbine sp ecia l is ts
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 32/126
Th is was done with the coo pera tion of th e Ingersoll-R.and Company
which
has
fu rn ished most of the s t ea m condensers a t The Geysers
plant.
Befo re p re l im ina ry condenser des igns could begin , however , some
in i t i al dec i s ions had to be ma de , pa r t i c u la r ly w i th r e s pec t t o ma te r i a l s .
Be cau se of the expected CO and
H2S
content of the candidate
br in es and in defe rence to exper ience a t The Ge ysers , the fo llowing
s e l ec t io n s w e r e m a d e f o r a l l c a s e s :
Shell
Non-welded inte rn al s Type 316
Welded int ern als Type 316
L
Tube shee ts
Tube s Type 316
Type 3 16 L cla d
Type 316 clad on s te am s ide only
The des ig ner s we re g iven the op tion of tube d iam ete rs f ro m 14
mm
( 3 / 4 ” ) t o
25 .4 mm
(1” ) with
a
tube wa ll thi ckn ess of
0. 7 mm (22
BWG).
F o r s ta in less tubes of these d im ens ions , wate r ve loc i t ies of seven to
n ine fee t p er second
a r e
usual ly us ed in public ut i li ty power plants .
We s e lec te d an average va lue of e igh t fee t pe r second. Assuming tha t
an Am er t ap cont inuous m echanica l c lean ing sy s te m would be used wi th
the cooling water ,
a
condenser
c l ean l ine s s f ac to r
of 0.85
w as u sed fo r
a l l c a s e s .
A co ld-wate r t em per a tu re compat ib le wi th the hea t - s ink cha rac te r i s t i cs
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 33/126
o r d e r
of
magni tude l ar ge r than i n convent ional publ ic u t i l i ty power
p lant s . Fu r th e r , the poor in i t i a l s t e am condi tions make s team je t
e je c to rs uneconomical in these appl ica t ions . Vacuum pumps we re
s ized to accommodate the expected gas f low fr o m the br ine p lus the
amount of a i r normal ly accumulated through leakage. Where cold
wat e r t emp era tu res a r e su f f icien tly low, the use of p re -condense rs was
investigated.
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 34/126
THE BINARY PROCESS
GENERAL PROCESS DESCR.IPTION
T h e b i n a r y p r o c e s s f o r p r od uc in g e l e c t r i c e n e r g y f r o m g e o th e r ma l
re se rv oi r f lu id involves the t ra ns fe r of heat to a second ary , in-plant
working fluid.
produce power .
shel l and tube cond ensers .
The working fluid
i s
expanded through
a
turbine to
The expanded gas
is
then condensed in a bat ter y of
The working fluid i s cont inual ly rec i rc u la ted f r om the tu rb ine to the
hea t source .
and tube exchangers a t an e leva ted p ress ure .
f lu id f lows f r o m the product ion wel ls through the tubes .
fe r r ed f ro m the res e rv o i r f luid to the work ing f luid.
e i the r in the sub cr i t i ca l o r supe r -c r i t i ca l r egion.
fluid
i s
pumped f r om the p lant to in jec t ion wel ls .
The fluid i s pumped to the s hell s id e of a bat te ry of sh ell
Hy d r o t he r ma l r e s e r v o i r
Heat i s t r a n s -
Opera t ion ma y be
The spen t r e s e rv o i r
CONVERSION STUDY BASIS
T h e b a s i s u s e d in develop ing the b ina ry p roc ess des ign fo r the th r ee
p lan t s i t e s
i s
defined below:
1.
E a c h p la n t i s s i z e d f o r a net output of 50 MWe.
be s ize d wi th suff icient capaci ty to provide fo r in-plant e l ec t r ic
The genera to r wi l l
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 35/126
The pr i m ar y purpos e of the above condi tions and assump tions was to
es tab l i sh a un i fo rm base of comp ar i son fo r a l l th ree p lan t s i t e s .
Select ion of the opera t ing f lu id and opera t ing condit ions was d et er -
mined fo r each s i t e by a compute r p rog ram , evaluat ing the the r mo -
dynamic p ro per t i e s of va r ious sys tem s .
mi ze the re se r vo i r f luid f low requ i reme nts .
The emphas i s was to m in i -
SELECTION O F WORKING FLU ID
Ligh t a l ipha t ic hydrocarbons ( such a s p ropane, i sobu tane and i so -
pen tane) appear to be the b es t cand ida te work ing f lu ids fo r mo s t
geo the rm al app l ica t ions .
p r o p e r t i e s , a r e t h e r ma l l y s t a b le , n o n c o rr o s iv e , a nd a v ai l ab l e i n l a r g e
quant i t ies at reasonab le p r ic es (abou t
50
cen ts /ga l lon) .
They have fa vorab le the rmodynamic
T h e F r e o n s m a y a l s o b e u s e d.
the rmodynamic p rop er t i e s , a r e expensive (about $5 /ga llon) , and a r e
the r ma l ly uns tab le .
f l a mma b l e.
However, they offer no advantage in
The ir only advantage i s that they
a r e
non-
A num ber of ot he r candidate f luids have bee n suggested , including
all
of the obvious ga se s such as am mon ia ,
sulf ur d ioxide , carb on dioxide
and l ight a l ip hat ic o lef ins .
l ight a l iphat ic hydrocarb ons .
None appe ar to offer advantages over the
Another v i r tu e of the a l iphat ic s i s tha t the i r the rm odynamic and
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 36/126
THE HYBRID PROCESS
GENERAL
A hybrid power plant i s a combination of two pr oc es se s, the f lash ed
s te am pro ces s and the b ina ry power cycle p rocess .
f lashed to produce s tea m at a re la t ively high pr es su re , which i s used
to dr ive a turbine-genera tor .
the working fluid which driv es a second turb ine-g enera tor.
Rese rvo i r f lu id is
The res e rv o i r f luid i s then used to heat
THE FLASHED STEAM SECTION
The desig n of a hybrid plant s ta rt s with f ixing the pr es su re a t which the
s t e a m i s f l as h e d f r o m t h e r e s e r v o i r flu id .
des i r able because the high pre ss ur e wi l l improve turbine efficiency and
reduce the turbine s ize and cost. T he p r e s s u r e t h a t i s chosen affects
the rel at ive si ze s of the two pa rt s of the plant, a s well a s the quanti ty
of r es er vo ir f lu id requir ed by the plant .
d i f fe rent s t eam -f lash p re ss ur es wer e inves tiga ted to de te rmine the
mo st efficient generating condit ion fo r the plant.
High p r e s s u r e s t e a m i s
F o r e a c h p la nt , s e v e r a l
THE BINARY SECTION
The f lashing of the s te am fr om the re se rv oi r f luid resu l ts in cooling the
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 37/126
HEBER CONVERSION PLANTS
Detailed data relat ive t o the s i te , the geology, the reservoir , the
environm ent, plant facil i t ies and field facil i t ies a r e contained in
companion volum es.
of th is sec t ion and succeeding sect ions a r e repeate d in th is volum e.
Only the data n ec es sa ry to fulf il l the objectives
THE RESERVOIR
/
The Heber geo thermal re ser voi r i s located in the southern par t of the
Im pe r ia l Val ley a t an e levat ion that i s c lose to sea leve l .
S u mme r t ime t e mp e r a t u r e s v a r y up
t o
49
C
(120
F);
one percent of the
t i me d ur in g t he s u m e r mo n t hs , th e wet b ul b t e mp e r a t u r e r e a c h e s
o r
exceeds 2 7 C (80 F) . This wet bulb tem per atu re was used for des ign.
T he a r e a i s l e ve l a nd de vo te d m a i n l y
t o
a g r i c u l t u r e .
bounded by irr ig at io n ditches which
will
supply makeup w ater to the
plant.
T he p la n t s i t e i s
Roads and power l in es ar e close to the si te .
The res er vo ir f lu id has a to ta l d issolved sol ids content of 15,000 ppm.
The bottom hole t em pe rat ure is 182
C (360
F ) .
i f
t h e r e i s no h e a t r e c h a r g e , t he t e mp e r a t u r e
of
t h e r e s e r v o i r wil l
decline about
20
C
(35
F )
over a 25-year per iod a t a sus ta ined pro-
duct ion ra te
of 200
MWe.
This t empera tu re d rop of the reservoir f lu id
Analysis indicates that
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 38/126
T e m p e r a t u r e ,
C
T e m p e r a t u r e , F Fouling Fa c to r
176 to 132 350 to 270
O O O l
132 to 80
270 to 176 O O l l
80 to 65 176 to 148 .00 33
These fa c to rs a r e t enta t ive in tha t the re su l t s of
a
22-day t es t have
been ex t rapo la ted to p red ic t
a
foul ing fac to r sui table for one yea r ' s
opera t ion.
months to conf i rm these f igures .
Fu r t he r te s ts should be conducted over
a
per io d of s eve ra l
The exchanger te s t s wer e conducted us ing ti tanium, 90% cupro nickel
and mild s te e l exchanger tubes .
t i t an ium tubes a f te r 560 hou rs ' exposure ; some c or ro s ion occur r ed to
the cupro nickel tubes af ter
200
ho urs ' test in g; and sl ight pit t ing and
sur fa ce decarbon iza t ion wer e ob se rved on the ca r bon s tee l tubes a f t e r
560 ho ur s of test in g.
t u b e s ha d o c c u r r e d p r i o r t o t he t e s t p r o g r a m.
that cor ros ion during thei r t es t work was negl ig ible. Accordingly, we
have spe cified the use of st ee l in all equipment exposed to br in e or
f l a shed s team , excep t s t ea m tu rb ines and su r face condense rs a s no ted
in the p rev ious sec t ion . Fu r th e r co r ro s ion t e s t s wi th the Heber b r ine
should be conducted befo re a f inal dec ision i s made on p lan t ma te r ia l s .
No
cor ro s ion was o bse rved on the
It i s possible that the s l ight corr os i on of the s tee l
Chevron has indicated
FLASHED STEAM
P U N T
A pr oc es s f low she et of the f lashed s te am plant i s shown in drawing
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 39/126
T he seconda ry f l a sh d ru ms f loa t on the l ine , t he i r p r e s su re va ry ing
wi th tu rb ine- s tage p r es su re and with demand .
The f lashed l iqu id f lows f ro m the secon d-s tage f lash d ru ms to the
suc t ion of the in jec t ion pumps which re t u r n the l iqu id to the re se rv o i r .
L iquid leve l
i s
main ta ined in the seco nd-s tage f lash d ru ms by a con t ro l
va lve on the pump d ischarge .
The turbine- .generator
is
ope ra t ed as
a
base-load unit under load
contro l . The opera tor ass i gns a load to the gener a tor , and the tu rb ine
mu st a ccep t tha t load a t cons tan t speed .
de tec ts changes in load and ad jus ts adm iss ion va lves on bo th the
p r im ar y and seconda ry s t e am l ine s to s a t i s fy the a s s ignmen t .
s epa r a t e emergency t r i p mechan i sm on the tu rb ine sha f t w i l l c lo se
emergency s top va lve s on bo th p r im ar y and seconda ry s t e am l ine s i f
tu rb ine speed exceeds
3,600
r p m b y
a
given perce n tage .
The turbine governor
A
E xhaus t s t e a m f r om the tu rb ine pa s s e s d i r ec t ly into a su r f ace condense r ,
w h e r e a b ac k p r e s s u r e
of
13.5 k P a
(4
n. Hg)
i s
obtained under design
cooling-water conditions.
the in jec t ion pumps .
mak e the rep len ishment vo lume subs tan tia l ly equa l to
the
volume
of
f r e s h b r ine de l ive red to the p lan t.
103
C (217 F).
The c onde ns a t e i s pumped
to
t he suct ion of
The condensate is added to the reduced br ine to
Ave rage tem pe ra tu re of th is flow
is
Cool ing wate r f ro m an induced dra f t cool ing tower en te rs the co ndenser
at
35
C (95
F )
and r e tu rn s to the tow er
at
49
C (120
F) .
The hot cooling
w a te r t em pe ra tu re g ive s a min imum condense r app roach
of
2.7 C
(5 F).
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 40/126
A su m m ar y of per t inent des ign data i s a s follows:
Rese rvo i r f lu id
Ge ne rat or output 55.0 MWe
Pum ping work 3.2 MWe
Cooling tow er wo rk
1 .1
MWe
Net output 50 .7 MWe
Res ervo i r f lu id /ne t kwh
4 .54 M k g / h r ( 10 .0 1 M l b s / h r )
90 kg (200 lb s)
When res e r vo i r t emp era tu res dec i ine wi th deple tion, in i t i a l e lec t r i ca l
output can be maintained by inc rea sin g hot wat er f low.
Theore t i ca l ly , a plant des igned for th e depletion condit ion of 163 C
(325 F) would re qui re 37% m or e hot wa ter than one des igned for the
ini t ia l condition.
(325
F )
hot wa ter would req uir e a l t ere d s t ea m condit ions to mainta in
propor t ion a l flows th rough the tu rb ine s tages .
63% in cr ea se d flow of hot water .
a r e comp ared be low:
How ever, opera tion of the ba se -c as e plant with 163 C
This would re su l t in a
Init ial and final operating condit ions
In i t i a l F ina l
Reservoir Fluid
4 .54 M kg /h r
(10. 01 M lb s /h r )
7 .39 M kg /h r
( 1 6 . 3 M l b s / h r )
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 41/126
BINARY PLANT
A pr oc es s f low she et of th e b inary plant
i s
shown on drawing number
7523-D-3205.
fo r the in i t ia l re se rv oi r condit ions.
Th is f low shee t p resen t s the hea t and m ate r ia l ba lances
Liquid isobutane i s preh eated and vapor ized by exchange with the br i ne
to a pr es s ur e of 4137 kP a (600 ps ia ) and a te m pe ra tu re of 149 C (300 F).
The super - c r i t i c a l vapor d r ive s an expansion tu rbine .
vapor f ro m the tu rb ine condense r f lows to an accumula to r and
i s
pumped
back through the bri ne ex changer com pleting the circ uit .
The effluent
A sum ma ry of the per t inent des ign data is a s fo llows:
Rese rvo i r f lu id
Isobutane
Ge ner ato r output 64.28 MWe
Pumping work 9.48 MWe
Cooling to w er wo rk 4.83 MWe
50.00 MWe
63 kg (139 lb s)
3 .149 M kg/ hr (6.942 M lb s / h r)
3 .702 M kg /h r (8.161 M l b s / h r )
Rese rvo i r f lu id lne t kwh
The magnitude of th e above flow requ ire me nts ma kes the us e of
pa r a l l e l f low pa ths ne ces sa r y o r de s i rab l e in va r ious sec t ions of the
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 42/126
r e s u l t s i n
a
signif icant reduct ion in the c ost of heat t ra ns fe r equipment
f o r t h i s s e r v i c e a s c o m p a r ed t o o u r f o r m e r e s t i m a t e s .
It i s
an t ic ipa ted tha t the exchangers wi l l be c leaned e i ther mechanica l ly
o r chemica l ly once pe r y ea r dur ing an annua l tu rnaround .
v is ion has been m ade fo r perm anen t ins ta l la t ion fo r c leaning.
No p r o -
E xpande r quo ta tions w e r e r ece ived f ro m fou r vendo r s . T h ree w e re fo r
axi al f low designs, and one (Rotoflow) pr ep ar ed a ra di al in-f low design.
The Rotoflow offer ing was u sed in th is s tudy, but fur t he r evaluat ions
of expander o f fe r ings a r e nec es sa ry before a f ina l se lec t ion
i s
made.
The e igh t isobutane pumps a r e mul t i - s tage ve r t ic a l cen t r i fuga l pumps ,
1 ,750 hp each . These pumps ,
a s
well a s cooling tower pum ps and the
cool ing tower fans a r e e lec t r ica l l y d r iven .
P r i m a r y p r o c e s s c on tr ol
i s
based on the p r em ise tha t p lan t ou tput wi l l
v ar y with demand. Consequently,
a
load con t ro l w i th manua l se t po int
i s
i ncluded fo r t he gene ra to r ,
control l ing the iso butane f low ra te t o the
turb ine . Res erv o i r f lu id f low ra te
is
control led by the tem pe ra tu re of
the isobutane vapor. Adjustme nt of isobutane and re se rv oi r flu id f low
ra t e s to each pa ra l l e l t r a i n of h yd ro ca rbo n / r e se rvo i r f lu id hea t
exchangers
i s
manual .
f low ra t e s to each condense r i s a ls o manual.
em erg enc y over spe ed shutdown of the turbin e.
Adjus tment
of
isobutane vapor and cooling water
P lan t de s ign p rov ides fo r
P re l im ina ry f i e ld s tud ie s ind ica t e tha t t he w e ll fl u id t empe ra tu re a t
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 43/126
Base Case Depleted Case
586 kP a (85 ps i a )
896 kPa (130 ps i a )
orking fluid accum ulato r
ope ra t ing p re s su re
The inc rease in requ i red f low ra t es fo r res e rv o i r f lu id and work ing
fluid wil l nec ess i ta t e futur e changes t o the plant equipment .
numb er of br in e /working f luid exch ange rs , hydrocarbon co nden sers ,
work ing f lu id c i rcu la tion pumps , coo ling wate r c i rcu la tion p u p s , and
cooling tower cel ls m ay inc rea se. The turbine -expander
is
designed
to ope rate und er the conditions of the depleted ca se with a mi nim um
change in pa r t s .
The
The req u i red des ign pre ss ur e fo r accu mula tors , work ing f lu id s ide of
the working f luid con dens ers and the c as e of the turbine
w i l l
i nc rea se .
The des ign pre ss ur es fo r the equ ipment fu rn ished in the base case
have been up- ra t ed t o m ee t this condition.
Piping
as
shown for the ba se case (m ajo r l in es ) wi l l handle the
i n c r e a s e d f l o w
req uir em ent s . Additional piping, instrumentat ion and
e l e c t ri c a l m a t e r i a l
i .
e . , sw i tch gea r ) w i l l be r equ i r ed fo r
the
new
equipment .
Thus, the plant
is
somew hat ove rsize d fo r the beginning condit ions
but m ay be e conomic al ly expanded to accommo date the depleted
re s e rv o i r cond i tions .
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 44/126
Res ervo i r f lu id /ne t kwh
6 5
kg (145 lb s)
These condit ions we re chosen af te r having considered f lashing
tem pera tu re s be tween 160 C (320
F )
and 171 C (340 F) in combination
with isobutane expander in le t condi tions ranging f ro m 400 t o 600 p s i a
a t t em pera tu re s be tween 127
C
(260 F ) and
149
C (300 F).
operat ing condit ions opt imize the power gen era te d pe r w el l f lu id flow
ra te .
The se lec ted
Wa te r - s ea l vacuum pumps wer e se lec ted to rem ove noncondensab le
g a s e s f r o m t h e s u r f a c e c o n d e n s e r s b e c a u s e t he s e a l - wa t e r c o nd e ns e s
a
l a r ge pa r t of the en t ra ined wa te r vapor .
blow down will be u sed a s
sea l wa te r . The noncondensab le gase s wi l l
be pumped in to the f l a re sys tem .
d i s p e r s a l of the hydrogen sulfide pre sen t. The blowdown and se al
wat er w i l l be pumped in to the eff luent re se rv oi r f lu id to avoid contami-
nating the environment.
Most of the cooling tow er
T h e f l a r e s t a c k i s des igned fo r
The bas ic p ro ces s con t ro l s a r e the manua l se t po in t load con tro l s a t
the two turbine-genera tor uni ts .
o the r .
bu t have d i f fe ren t r e sponse l ags , the over r ide wi l l p reven t both
con t ro l s f ro m f igh ting each o the r .
One of the two co ntr ols will re se t the
Since both uni ts depend on the sam e s ou rce of re se rv oi r f lu id
An i sobu tane vapor t empe ra tu re con t ro l r egu la tes the f low of r ese rvo i r
f lu id through the isobutane exchange rs .
con trol regu la tes the f low of r es er vo ir f lu id to the p lant .
A s t e a m s e p a r a t o r l e v e l
All the
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 45/126
RESERVOIR FAC ILITIES
The sys tem s developed in th is s tudy for the production
of
geo thermal
hot wa te r , and the d i sposa l of the spen t wa te r , a r e based on p re mi ses
se t for th by Chevron Oil Company,
dev elop ers of the He ber field.
pr oc es s base s es tabl ished by Chevron include:
The
Product ion
1.
2.
3.
4.
Direct ional dr i l l ing of a l l product ion wel ls required fo r a
50
MWe
power p lant wi l l be concentra ted in an a re a of about one acr e .
Produc tion wells will be pumped a t a r at e of about 295 m 3 /h r
(1,300 gpm).
Two a l t e rna te sand s epa ra t o rs wi ll be p rov ided , each s ized fo r a
one-m inute resi den ce of the tota l f low.
An au tomat ic bypass of the power p lant wi l l be provide d sending hot
geother mal water d i rec t ly to the in ject ion sys tem.
Injection
1.
Spent water in jec t ion
i s
made through wel ls dr i l led at th ree i s l ands
uniformly spaced on one quadrant
of
the c i rcumference
of
the
re se rv oi r having a r adiu s of about 3 ,048 m (10,000 fee t )
i t s
c e n t e r
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 46/126
Produc t ion Sys tem s
The des ign of the production piping s ys te m s
i s
i l lus t ra ted i n the f l a shed
st ea m s yst em shown in drawing numb er 7523-D-3223.
s ized to accommodate the l a rg e r f low a t t end ing opera t ion when the
g e o t h e r ma l wa t e r t e mp e r a t u r e d e c l in e s t o 163 C (325 F) .
provided with a down-hole pump ra t ed at 295 m3/hr (1300 gpm) and
2,069 kP a (300 ps i ) head.
pipe in the s ys te m, per t inent d imensions of p ipe runs a r e g iven in the
drawing.
T he l i n es a r e
E a c h we l l
i s
To facil i ta te the e st i ma tio n of the co st of the
Down-hole pumps a r e ve r t i c a l sha f t -d r iven cen t r i fuga l s a s o f fe red by
P e e r l e s s P u m p Co.
The bear ings
wil l be a spe cia l te f lon type sui table fo r h igh tem pera ture .
The pump
tubing wil l be f lushed with f i l te r ed product for lubr ica t ion of l ine-shaf t
bea r ings .
Bowl sett ing will be about
400
feet .
To mainta in a check on the opera t ion, each wel l
i s
provided with
t e m p e r a t u r e , p r e s s u r e a nd fl ow r e c o r d e r s . D i sc h ar g e p r e s s u r e
i s
control led by
a
pr es su re con t ro l va lve on a l ine which recyc les ho t
wa ter ba ck to the well .
The to ta l ho t wa te r p roduced
i s
al te rnate ly pass ed through one of two
sand sep ara to r s , each s ized to p rov ide one minu te res idence and a
velocity of about seven feet/ seco nd.
g e o t h e r ma l wa t e r f r o m t h e we l l s
is
expec ted to d rop ou t in the
s e p a r a t o r .
Any sand en t ra ined in the
The efficiency of sa nd sepa rat ion
i s
moni to red by
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 47/126
F l a s h e d S t e a m
B i n a r y
Hybrid
Inj
e
c t ion Sys tem s
Field Condit ions
Required Flow Wells Require d
Endnitial End Init ial
4 .5 M k g / h r
7 .4 M kg /h r
(10.0 M lbs /h r ) (16 .3 M l b s / h r )
4 .5
M
k g / h r
.1 M k g / h r
(6 .942 M lbs /h r ) (9 .9 M l b s / h r )
5 .81 M kg /h r.288
M
k g / h r
(7. 249 M lbs/hr) (12. 8 M lb s/ h r)
16
21
12 1 9
13 21
The geo the rm al wa te r f r o m the power p lant
is
p u mp - d b a c k
t
re se rv o i r th rough in jec t ion we l l s . The inject ion piping s ys te m for the
f las hed s te am pro ce ss a t Heber , shown in drawing 7523-D-3224,
i l lus t ra tes
the g e n e r a l
f e a t u r e s
of s u c h s y s t e ms . T w o n j e c t i on pumps
a r e p ro v id e d f o r t h e t o t a l fl ow whi ch , f o r t h e f la s h e d s t e a m p r o c e s s ,
va r i es f r om about 4 .5 M kg /h r (10. 0
M
l b s / h r ) in i t ia l ly t o 7 .4 M k g / h r
(16. 3
M
l b s / h r ) whe n th e g e o t h e r ma l ho t wa t e r t e mp e r a t u r e d e c l i n e s t o
163 C (325 F). The injection pumps have
a
discharge p re ss ur e of abou t
1 ,620 kPa (235 ps ia ) and de l ive r the spen t wa te r t o the fa r the s t in jec tion
wel l i s l and
at
about 1,48 2 kP a (215 psia).
c a n b e u s e d t o r a i s e t h e p r e s s u r e t o t h e ma x i mu m 2 ,8 6 1 k P a (4 15 p s i a )
at
the we l l head f o r in jec t ion at 590 m3 /h r (2 ,600 gpm).
the
At each i s l and
a
boos te r pump
Under init ial
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 48/126
P r o c e s s
F lashed s team
Binary
Hybrid
Wells Required
Initi al Fie ld Condition End Fi eld Condition
10
9
10
GENERAL FACILITIES
The following facil i t i es a r e provided for ea ch of the convers ion plants:
B u ild ng
s
The m a in con trol building is 15 by 23 m (50 by 75 fee t) and contains the
control room,
s w i t c h
gear , l abora to ry and shop. The com pres sor
building
is
7 . 5 by 7. 5
m
(25 by 25 fee t) and contains the
a i r
c o m p r e s s o r s
and dr ye rs . The cooling tower t rea tm ent build ing is 4. by 7. 5 m
(15 by 25 fee t) and contains the chem ical mixing ve sse ls and injection
pumps.
F i r e P r o te c t io n
The binary and hybr id p lants use the cooling tower bas in a s a f i r e-
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 49/126
provided with a dat a logging sy st em which w i l l moni to r and record all
per t inen t va r iab les .
date when mul t ip le p lants have been ins ta l led a t the r es er vo ir , a
s ingle computer can be in s ta l led to control a l l the p lants .
The sys tem
w i l l
be installed s o tha t a t a l a te r
Blow -down Dis pos al
A l l plants ar e des igned to d ispose of contaminated pro ce ss wat er s uch
a s cooling towe r blow down by disc harg ing the f luid into the ag ric ul tur al
d r a i n s .
No
t r ea tme nt fac i l i t i e s fo r the was tewate r a re p lanned.
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 50/126
v
V-3
v-4
PRIMARY
FLASH VE55EI-S
SECONDARY
F U 5 H
UE533-5
T I €
T U R ~ N E SURFACE
ONDENSER
G- I
GEN=TOR
STREAM PROPERTIES
N6T OUFWT K W
]P ,=
CT
COOL ING T O W E R
Vp-I
ONDEN~TE
UMP
VACUUM PUMP
2 1 1 1
PM
KW.
153
W C F M
LW
THE
BEN
M T O
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 51/126
T
G l
nnl~r /u .cEXCUANGER
EXPANDER
GENERATOR
H SURGE DRUM
COOLING TOWER
p l
H.C.
CIQCUL TIOU PUMP
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 52/126
6
E NE RATO R
v- l
C SUUY W U M
P-l
. C . CIRCULATION
PUMP
STREAM PROPERTIES
THE
BEN
HOLT CO
b- l
u
a < S 8Srn
D
c
0m
BINARY PO W ER PANT
s u a o F OP E . S T , ~ T E UP OW
I*.'.
HEBER
CLIFORNIA
TED e45E
M ~ E O
u n
, ,TM~
EP
R \
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 53/126
R E F E R E N C E DR WING
WMGW T , U
CT I
COOLING TOWER
CONOENIATE PUMP
345
GPM
k i
BLOWDOWN PUMP
63 GPM
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 54/126
VALLES CALDERA CONVERSION PLANTS
THE RESERVOIR
The Valles Ca ldera hydro thermal re se rv o i r i s loca ted in the nor th -
ea st er n co rn er of Sandoval County, New Mexico. The re se rv oi r i s
loca ted in mountainous te r ra in at an elevation of about 2 ,750 m et er s
( 9 , 0 0 0
f ee t ) . A t th i s e levat ion , a tm osphe r i c p r e s su re
i s
7 2 .4 k P a
(10.
5
ps ia ) .
A i r t e m p e r a t u r e s a t th e
s i te
range f r om 32 C
( 9 0 F )
i n s u m m e r t i m e t o
a s
l ow a s -40 C
( -40 F )
in the winter t ime. One per cen t of the t im e
dur ing the s um me r months , the wet bulb tem per a tu re in the a r ea
exceeds a temperature of
17
C
( 6 2 F).
T his t empe ra tu re w as u sed
f o r
de sign.
T he a r e a
i s
quite rough, with the geo therm al wells located along the
val leys cr ea te d by Sulfur Cree k and Redondo Creek.
a r ea i s r e s t r i c t e d , and roads to the s i t e a r e indica ted to be d i r t .
Acc ess to the
The avai labi l i ty of w ate r a t t he s i t e i s re st r ic te d by regulat ions of
w a te r r igh t s a s de sc ribed in the P re l im ina ry E nv i ronmen ta l
A s s e s s m e n t .
f ro m Santa C la r a Cr eek loca ted in the nor thwes t co rne r of Sandova l
County,
a
dis tan ce of appro xim ately 18
miles.
e lec t r i c pow er in the a r ea ,
and
it
would be necessary to br ing the
The ass es sm en t sugges ts tha t wate r migh t be ob tainab le
T he re a r e no roads no r
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 55/126
Wells a r e self-producing, providing well head f luid at the following
conditions:
T em pera tu re 182 C
(360 F)
P r e s s u r e 1 , 0 3 4 k P a (150 p s i )
F lo w r a t e
113 ,400 kg /hr (250 ,000 lb s / h r )
T h e s e d a t a . w e re us e d a s a des ign ba s i s .
No
in format ion
i s
ava i lab le on the cor r os i ve chara c te r i s t ics of th is
fluid.
to fluid f r om the H ebe r r e se rvo i r .
su i tab le ma te r i a l fo r p iping and ves se l s .
T he re fo re ,
it
w a s a s s u m e d t h a t
i ts
prope r t i e s w ou ld be s imi l a r
C a rbon s t ee l i s as sum ed to be
a
The S iOz pre sen t in the f lu id may caus e s ca l e to fo r m on the hea t
exchanger tu bes of the bina ry and hybrid plants .
fo rm ed to de te rmine the t em pe ra tu re l eve l a t w hich sca l e fo rma t ion
occu r s . If s ca l e fo rma t ion
i s
shown
to
occu r , then the b inary and
hybr i d p l a n t s c ou ld be de s i gne d to u s e f l a s he d s t e a m for heat ing.
Beca use the fou ling ch ara c te r i s t ics of the re se rv o i r flu id we re
not
known, the Heber fou l ing fa c to rs wer e used fo r the Val les Ca ldera
b ina ry and hybrid p lan ts .
T es t s should be pe r -
Some noncondensable gas es oc cur in the f lashed s team , but the con-
cen t r a t ion of ga s in the r e s e r vo i r f lu id
i s
not known.
t ra t io n of noncondensab le gases n ecess i ta tes
a
maj o r inves tmen t in
vacuum pumps fo r t he f l a shed s t e am and hyb r id p l an ts .
A
high concen-
It
w a s a s s u m e d
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 56/126
f low which cor re spon ds to a dec rea se i n the down-hole te mp era tur e of
20 C (35 F).
FLASHED STEAM PLAN T
Drawing number 7523-D-3203 i s a pro ce ss f low diag ra m of the Valles
Cald era f lashed s tea m p lan t . The ho t re se rv o i r f lu id en te rs the p lan t
at
a flow ra t e of 1. 8
M
kg/hr (3 . 9 6
M
l b s / h r ) .
pa s s into tw o pa ra l l e l f i r s t - s t a ge f l a sh d rum s a t a p r e s su re o f 1, 055 kP a
(153 p s i a ) . T he f i r s t - s t age d rum p roduces 324 ,770 kg /h r (716 ,000 lb s / h r )
of p r im ar y s t ea m w h ich pa s se s th rough a s t e am sepa ra to r be fo re
reach ing the tu rb ine -gene ra to r a t a p r e s su re of 1, 055 kPa (153 psia and
a te m pe ra tu re of 182 C (360 F ) .
T he b r ine and s t ea m
T he l iquid f r om the f i r s t - s t age f l a sh d ru ms f low s to the s econd - s tage
f l a s h d r u m s w h e re
i ts
p r e s s u r e
i s
reduced to 232 kPa (33.7 psia) .
resu l tan t f las h p roduces 169 , 192 kg / hr (373 ,000 lb s / h r ) of secondary
s te am which f lows th rough
a
s te am s epa ra to r to a lower s tage of the
turb in e-gen era to r th rough a s epa ra te s e t of a dmi ss ion va lves .
s t ea m rea che s the tu rb ine a t a p r es su re of 228 kP a (33 .0 ps ia ) and a
t e m p e r a t u r e
of
125
C
(257
F).
l i ne , t he i r p re s s u r e va rying w i th tu rb ine s t age p r e s su re and w i th
dem a nd.
The
The
The s econdary f lash d rum s f loa t on the
T he f l a shed liquid flows f ro m the s econd - s tage f l a sh d rum s to the
suct ion of the inject ion pumps which re tu rn the l iquid to the re se rv oi r .
L iquid leve l i s m ain ta ined in
the
second - s tage f l a sh d rum s by a con t ro l
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 57/126
Noncondensab le gas es f ro m
the
r e s e rv o i r f lu id and
a i r
l ea k ag e a r e
removed f ro m the condenser by tw o l a r ge vacuum pumps in pa ra l l e l .
The exhaust
g a s
i s
discharged in to a ver t i ca l s tack which
i s
designed
to di sp er se the hydrogen sulf ide contaminant .
A sum ma ry of per t inen t des ign da ta fo r the f lashed s te am p lan t i s
a s
follows:
R ese r vo i r fluid r a t e
1 . 8
M kg /h r (3. 96 M lb s / h r )
5 5 . 0
MWeenerator output
Pum ping wo rk 1.9 MWe
Cooling tower w ork .1 MWe
Net output 5 2 . 0 MWe
Re se rv oi r f lu id/n et kwh 34 kg
(76
l b s )
BINARY P L A N T
T he r e s e rvo i r f lu id a t V a l le s C a lde ra f lows na tu ra lly f ro m the w el l ,
p roduc ing two ph ases a t the sur face in the fo llowing propor t ions :
S t e a m
15.
3’7’0 (by we ight)
Hot wat e r
84.
770
by weight)
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 58/126
The heated isopentane in a s ubc ri t i cal condition
is
used to dr ive the
expansion turbine.
A
generator output of approximately 56 MWe
i s
requ i red to p rov ide fo r in -p lan t
e lec t r i c
power consumption and produce
a net output of 50 MWe.
Te s t s ru n on geo thermal re se rv o i r f lu ids a t so me loca t ions have shown
an inc re as e in deposi t ion of sol ids when the f luid
i s
cooled. In the
absence of speci f ic tes t da ta on the r es e rv o i r f lu id a t Val les Ca ldera ,
the fou l ing fac tor s observed with the Heber re se rv o i r f lu id wer e used.
The hydr ocarb on/ res ervo i r f luid hea t exchangers a r e des igned wi th
four un i t s i n s e r ie s to fac i l i ta te c lean ing .
A
su mm ar y of the pert inen t design data for the binary plant i s a s
follows:
R ese r vo i r f lu id
Isopentane
Ge ner ato r output 56 .3 MWe
Pumping work
3 . 6
MWe
2 .7 MWeooling tower work
Net output 5 0 . 0 MWe
Res erv o i r f lu id /ne t kwh
1. 19 M kg /h r 2. 6 2 M l b s / h r )
2 . 10
M
kg /h r (4 . 62 M lb s /h r )
24 kg (52 l b s )
HYBRID PLANT
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 59/126
Wastewater w il l be pumped into the eff luent re ser vo ir f lu id to avoid
contaminating the environment.
A s um ma ry of the pert inent design data fo r the hybrid plant i s a s
follows:
R ese rv o i r f luid r a t e
Gen erat or output 56.0 MWe
Pum ping wor k 4.6 MWe
1.4 MWeooling tow er wor k
Net power 50.0 MWe
1.36 M kg/hr (3 .0 M l b s / h r )
Res erv o i r f lu id /ne t kwh
27. 2 kg
60
l b s )
RESERVOIR FACILITIES
The s y s t e m s de ve loped
for
produc t ion and in j ec t i on of g e o t h e r m a l f l u i d
a t Valles Caldera , New Mexico, a r e based on conventional ver t ical
dr i l l ing of the wells a t a spacing of 30 ac r es p e r well.
Based on
squ are p lo ts , the d is tance be tween wel l s
is
approx imate ly 349 m et er s
(1 ,145 fee t ) .
The production wells in this f ie ld a r e self-f lowing, and
the fluid at the well head i s a mix ture of s te am and geo ther mal wate r .
The preceding descrip t ion of the production sch em e at Heber , California
appl ies fo r the mos t pa r t to Val les Ca ldera ,
except that s pecial f low
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 60/126
The sch em e fo r in jec t ion of spent geothe rm al f lu id
a t
Val les Ca lde ra
i s
b a s i c a l l y t h e s a m e a s t h a t a t He b er . Ho we v er , t h e d i s ta n c e f r o m
the power p lant to the ne ar es t edge of the in jec t ion f ie ld is
1 ,524
m e t e r s
( 5 , 0 0 0 fee t ) ins tead of 3 , 0 48 m e t e r s (10 ,000 fee t used by Chevron a t
He b e r , a nd th e we l l s a r e s p a c e d a t
3 0
a c r e s p e r w ell .
r equ i rem ents a r e sum ma r ize d in the fo llowing tab le :
Injection well
No.
of We lls R.eq uired
P ro c e ss In i t ia l F i e ld Condit ion Fina l Condi t ion
F l a s h e d s t e a m
4 4
B i n a r y 3 3
Hybrid 3 3
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 61/126
VA V-5
E- T- E l
R E F E R E N C E DR W ING
W N ~
UWVESSEL5 V A W U ~ P U M P TU IN€ J R G L O N W N S € R D ~ W S M ~ N O T ~ L E
P RCO NO E NS L
k
G - I
GEZSATO
COOLlClG TO WE R
p l VP-I
CONDEk5KE
W P
V A C U ~MP
2 \ 09
IPH
5 3
CW
4900 CW
194
W
V A L E S
CALDERA
I
E P R
1
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 62/126
V
E l E 2
1 1
E 3 V T
STW ZNEWIUTOR STEAM YTEXCUWGER
INE/U.
CXL NGER EXKOERo u i ~ a
U.C
C C U H V U T ~
C O O C IU G T O W E R
P
C I R C U L A T I O N P U M P
P 2
. W
C I R C U L A T I O N
PUMP
STREAM PROPCRllES
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 63/126
V
I E V - 2 G
B R I N E / S T ~ EPARATOR
M I N E -
W C-CHANGER
~ T MRUBBER
SURFACE CWMNSER
TURBINE
k
E - 4
WAVR TU SILENCER VACUUM
-P
SUCTlOLl
CWDENYR
V
3 G Z
U .
AUFULATOR
24bMmv? M~0R
@ e
UMP
I6
OP
V A C W M PUMP
WL INSW UMP
54
GPr
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 64/126
RA FT R.IVER CONVERSION PL AN TS
THE R.ESERVOIR
The Raf t R iver hydro the rmal rese rvo i r is located in south-centra l
Idaho, approx imately 40 m il es sou theast of Burley.
T he a r e a l i e s
a long the Raf t River Val ley a t an e levat ion of about 1 ,400 me te rs
(4 ,800 fee t ) . At th i s e leva t ion the a tmos pher ic p r es su re i s 82 kPa
( 1 2
psia) .
A i r t e m p e r a t u r e s
at
the s i te range f ro m 38 C (100 F ) i n s u m m e r t i m e t o
a s lo w a s -34 C ( - 3 0 F ) in the wi nter t im e. The wet bulb tempe'rature in
the a r ea re ach es o r exceeds a maxim um of 18
C
(65
F )
one per ce nt of
t h e t i me d u r in g t h e s u m me r
months. Th is t em per a tu r e was used fo r
de sign.
T h e a r e a
i s
rugged with mountains reachin g
to
a bo u t 3 ,00 0 me t e r s
(9 ,800 fe e t ) e levation.
com es c lose to the geo the rmal p lan t s i t e .
U.
S. Highway 30
is a
three-lane highway which
Water f or m akeup to the cooling tower w i l l be taken f r o m the Raf t River
o r f r o m s u r f a c e wel ls .
Produ ct ion wel ls and in jec t ion we l ls have been a l located 30 ac re s of
g round a r ea pe r we l l.
a re as of the geothermal anomaly.
In ject ion wel ls wi l l be located on the cooler
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 65/126
The ge o the rm al p roducing we l l s m us t be pumped to ach ieve h igh p ro -
duct ion r a tes . It h a s b e e n a s s u m e d t h a t th e d i f f e r en t i al p r e s s u r e
requ i red to p roduce the we l l s
i s
2,068 kP a (300 ps ia) and that the
p r e s s u r e r e q u i r e d to i n j e c t th e b r i n e wi ll i n c r e a s e to 2 ,7 5 8 k P a
(400 psi a) a t the wel l head. We have used the sa m e pumping ra te of
295 m3/ hr (1 ,300 gpm/wel l ) a s
a t
Heber .
/-
The cor ros i on and fou ling ch arac te r i s t i c s of the Raf t R iver re s e rv o i r
fluid a r e not known.
T h e r e f o r e , it was as sum ed that the f lu id would
h av e t he s a m e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s a s the Heb er rese rv oi r f luid . We have
specif ied the use of s te e l in a l l equipment exposed to the re se rv oi r
f lu id o r f l a shed s team , excep t the s t ea m tu rb ines and su r fa ce con-
d e n s e r s w h e r e s t a i n le s s s t e e l i s used.
FLASHED STEAM PLANT
A pro ce ss f low d iagra m of the f l a shed-s te am p lan t i s shown in d rawing
number 7523-D-3207.
f l ow r a t e of 7. 39 M
kg/hr
(16 .3 M l b s / h r ) .
f i r s t - s ta g e f l a s h d r u ms
at
a p r e s s u r e of 290 kP a (42 psia ) . The
f i r s t -
s t a g e f l a s h p ro d u c e s 2 4 1 ,0 0 0 k g / h r ( 53 2 ,0 0 0 l b s / h r ) of p r i m a r y s t e a m
which pa sse s th rough a s te am sep ara to r be fo re reach ing the tu rb ine -
gen era t or a t a pr es su re of 284 kPA (41. 2 p s i a ) an d a t e mp e r a t u r e
of
132 C (270
F).
The ho t r e s e r vo i r f lu id en te r s the p lan t a t a
T he
brine
f lows
into
the
L iq u id f r o m t h e f i r s t - s t a g e f l a s h d r u ms f l ows t o t h e s e c o n d- s t ag e f l a s h
d r u m s w h e re
i ts
p r e s s u r e
i s
reduced to 114 kP a (16.6 ps ia) . The
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 66/126
tower a pproach and resu l t s in an expens ive tower.
me t r i c s tudy in which cold wa te r t em pera tu re was ra i sed s l igh t ly 1. 7
C
(3 F) inc rea sed the co st of the condenser m or e than it reduced the
co st of th e cooling tow er.
dens ing p re ss ur e was ra i sed s l igh t ly to
15
kPa (2.2 in. Hg) prod uced a
lo ss of ef f iciency and an in cr ea se in br i ne consumption. The pros pec-
t ive cooling tower capi ta l cos t saving was mo re than offse t by inc rea sed
br ine cos t s and inc re ased coo ling tower fa n horsepower .
However,
a
p a r a -
Sim ilar ly , another s tudy in which the con-
Turbine se lec t ion was di f ficult for the p lant .
bucket s i ze ment ioned e a r l i e r ,
55
MWe of output could be obt aine d only
with a four-flow , two -case m achine.
with a two-flow tur bin e was abo ut 38 MWe.
With the l imitations on
The ma xim um output a t ta inable
Noncondensable gas f low has been es t im ated a t 405 kg/ hr (893 lb s /h r)
base d on a b r ine ana lys i s .
den ser wi th vacuum pumps.
13 .8 kPa (2 in. Hg) , two s tages a r e required .
f i r s t - s ta ge pumps and two medium-s ize second-s tage pumps .
i s
provided for the d isp ers a l of the noncondensable gase s .
T h e s e g a s e s a r e r e mo v ed f r o m t h e c o n-
T h e r e a r e fo u r l a r g e
Bec ause of the low condensing pr es su re
A
s tack
A sum ma ry of per t inen t des ign data for the p lant
i s
a s fo llows:
R .ese rvo i r f lu id ra te
Gen erato r output
55.0
MWe
Pumping work
3 .7
MWe
7 .4 k g / h r ( 16 .3 M l b s / h r )
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 67/126
c
r e needed to me e t the p r oc es s f low requ i rements .
the p lan t i s s im i la r to the Heber b in a ry p lant .
In o the r re s pec t s ,
A su mm ary of per t inen t des ign data for the p lant i s a s fo llows:
R .ese rvo i r f lu id ra t e
Hydrocarbon f lu id ra te
Ge ner ato r output 67.5 MWe
Pum ping wo rk 15.9 MWe
Cooling tow er wo rk 1.6 MWe
50 .0 MWe
et power
Re ser vo ir f lu id /net kwh 100 kg (220 lb s)
5.0 M k g / h r ( 11 .0 M l b s / h r )
4 .8 M kg/hr (10.6 M l b s / h r )
HYBRID PLANT
A mixture
of
5 0 m o l
70
propane and 5070 sobutane was chosen as the
working fluid in the bina ry power cycle of the hy brid plant beca use of
the low temper a tu re of the r es e r vo i r f lu id.
des igned to gener a te 57 MWe, and the s te am f las h unit wi l l genera t e
9 MWe.
pe r we l l f luid f low ra te .
The b ina ry sec t ion i s
The se lec ted des ig n condi t ions opt imize the power gene ra ted
The pr oc es s flow dia gra m, drawing number 7523-D-3254B, shows the
plant operating condition. Th is p lan t , l ike the b ina ry p lan t , i s ch a rac -
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 68/126
but down-hole pumps a r e used to boost the f low to the des ign r a t e of
1 ,300 gpm pe r we ll .
g e n e r a l l y t he s a m e
a s
at Val les Caldera . At Raf t Rive r only in i t ia l
f i e ld condi tions a r e cons ide red ,
s ince any dec line in the res e rv o i r
t em pera tu re would resu l t in an excess ive in c rea se in p lan t and opera t ing
cos t s .
table.
The product ion and in jec t ion piping s chem es a r e
F lows and wel l r eq u i remen ts a r e sum mar ized in the fol lowing
No. of Wells Require d
P r o c e s s R.equired Flow of Well Flui d Prod uctio n Injection
F l a s h e d s t e a m 7 . 4 M kg/hr (16 .3 M l b s / h r ) 2 7 13
Binary 5 .0 M k g / h r
(11.0 M
l b s / h r ) 1 9 9
Hybr id 5 .4 M k g / h r ( 1 1 .9 M l b s / h r ) 20 10
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 69/126
V
PRIMARY FLASH VESSELS
6
CT
OOLING
T O W E R
P 2
OOLING W TER PUMP
I35 Doo
PH
z ms
L W
Vp I
P
FIRST
ST
PM
VACLIUM D U M P S
,
ib
US0
GFM
5 - 0
KW
COOLING TOWER
T
R E F E R E N C E D R A W I N G
on.wWGm 787L
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 70/126
P-l
H
C IR GTIOU
UMP
S T R E A M PROPERTIES
THE
BEN HOLT
CO
- ' L '
BINARV
AFT
RIVER
OWER
D HLANT
OPTIMIZED
CA 5E
-7
F Q I
K
A
s ,=w
13buLD FOE HTIHITE
0
WVJY#
c
0
U L
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 71/126
REFERENCE DRAWING
O CO nT c
V 4
W TER
TR P
SILENCER
T I
C O ~ L ~ T ~ W E
V CUUM
W P
W W
THE BEN HOLT CO
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 72/126
THERMODYNAMIC B1NAR.Y CYCLE ANALYSIS
In the deve lopment of the bas e b inary ca se s fo r the th ree s i te s , p r e -
l imi nary op t imiza t ion s tud ies we re mad e , and on the bas is of these
f ind ings the p r oc es s des ign fo r the base ca se was es tab l i shed .
Subsequently , a s creen ing s tudy was m ade to dete rm ine which f luids
and cyc le chara c te r i s t ics appe ared to be op t imal fo r ea ch of the
re se rv o i rs be ing stud ied . The re su l t s of th is s tudy a r e p re sen ted in
th is sec t ion .
The cyc le under cons idera t ion i s a s imple Rankine cyc le
as
shown in
Fi gu re 1. The working f luid i s a l ight a l iphat ic hydrocarbon. The
liquid working fluid
is
pumped to the opera t ing pres su re .
It i s
then
vapo rized by hea t exchange with the ge oth erm al f lu id .
gen era ted by passin g the working f luid through an expansion turbine.
The cycle
i s
com pleted by condens ation of the working fluid.
P ow er
i s
S eve ra l a s sumpt ions have been made in o r de r to min imize the ca s e
s tud ie s and ensu r e tha t t he c a s e s a r e comparab le .
tem per a tu re d i f fe rence (LMTD) for the condenser was 8 C (14 .4
F )
i n
a l l c a se s ; t h i s co r r e sponds to a 6 C (10
F )
cool ing wate r tempera ture
r i s e a n d 6 C (10 F ) appro ach for a pur e hydrocarbon . The min imu m
hydroca rbon exchange r app roach t emp e ra tu r e w as s e t a t
8
C (15
F )
fo r
all
case s .
No
working flu id condens ing pr es su re s be low loca l a tm os-
p h e r i c p r e s s u r e w e r e a ll ow ed .
The log mean
T he me teo ro log ica l va r i ab le s w e re
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 73/126
T he geo the rm a l f lu id r a t e
is
de te r min ed by
a
graph ical technique
uti l izing the tem per atu re- ent hal py plot of the R.ankine cycle .
known wel l flu id tem per a tu re and approach in the hea t exchanger , the
geo the rma l fluid r e j e c t t em pe ra tu re can be de termined .
ba lance
wil l
then prov ide the f low ra t es and thermodynamic s ta te o f
all
t he s t r ea m s in the cycle.
Exam ples of tem pera ture -en tha lpy p lo ts fo r
a s u p e r - c r i t i c a l a nd s u b c r i ti c a l c y c le a r e i l l u s tr a t e d i n F i g u r e s 2 and 3 .
With
a
A
hea t
The var ious cyc le permuta t ions we re op t imized wi th respe c t to geo-
the rm al f lu id consumpt ion .
t e m p e r a t u r e , p r e s s u r e a n d f lu id c o m po s it io n w e r e v a r i e d i n s e a r c h of
the lowes t well f lu id ra te .
mixed f luid cyc les , the condenser LMTD was he ld cons tan t . Seve ra l
gen era l s ta tements can be mad e about the op t imum cyc le fo r
a
given
case .
F o r e a c h r e s e r v o i r c a se ,
the cycle
In o r de r to p rope r ly compare pu re and
1.
2.
3 .
4.
A s th e r e s e r v o i r t e m p e r a t u r e i n c r e a s e s ,
a heavie r molecu la r
weigh t f lu id i s p re fe ra b le .
A s the m olecu la r weigh t
of
the work ing flu id incr ea se s ,
the
o p ti m a l s y s t e m p r e s s u r e w il l d e c r e a s e .
A mixed f lu id wi l l genera l ly re su l t in
a
lower condens ing pressure
s ince
i t
does not have a constant condensing temperature .
a l lows a cl os er ap proac h to the cooling wat er enthalpy curve.
This
The op t imum opera ting condi tions wi l l genera l ly res u l t in
a
min i -
m um amoun t
of
supe rhea t in the tu rb ine exhaus t .
. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . - .. -- __.
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 74/126
in the desig n cr i t er ia and knowledge of loc al condit ions. It i s t h e r e f o r e
not f ea s ib l e f ro m a
t ime
and expense s tandpoin t to t r y to c a r r y the op t i -
miza t ion
t o
too f ine
a
degree .
c y c le s we s h a l l r e f e r t o a s p r e f e r r e d w i l l b e c lo s e t o t he t r u e o p t h u m
condi tion . The ma jor var iab les a r e : opera t ing tem per a tu re , opera t ing
pr es su re and work ing f lu id . A s between different ca se s tudies , the
t emp era tu r e w i l l not be va r i ed by l e s s than
3 C
(5
F )
i n s ea rc h of an
op t imum; the p r e s s u r e w i l l not be v a r i ed l e s s than 70 kP a (10 p s i ) ; and
the com posit ion of a mi xt ur e will not be va ri ed l e s s than 10% of one
component.
It can, however, be expected tha t the
The res ul ts of the Hebe r
s tud ies a r e tabu la ted in Table
3
.
Twenty
d i f fe ren t simple binary cyc les wer e eva lua ted
f o r
the Heber des ign
condit ions. Since much of th is inform ation was usable fo r the other
f ie lds , fewer case s wer e requ i r ed in the la t e r s tud ies . In it ial ly, a
bas e ca se w as s e l ec t ed to s e rve a s a s t a r t ing poin t.
cycle a t 4 , 137 kP a (600 ps ia ) and 149
C (300 F )
was se lec ted , based on
our p rev ious exper ience a s being
a
r ea sonab le ca se f ro m wh ich to
optimize.
The bas e c as e prod uced 7.203 MWe p er mi llio n pounds of we ll fluid.
A s u m m a r y
i s
l isted below:
A
pure isobutane
All c as es we re s iz ed fo r a net e l ec tr i ca l output of 50 MWe.
Well fluid
Shaft work 87,966 BHP
3 ,148 ,000 kg /h r (6 , 940 ,000 lb s /h r )
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 75/126
The power product ion f r om the cycles des igned fo r th is s i te ranged
fr om 7. 52 MWe/m ill ion pounds well f luid fo r the be st cycle to 6.38
MW e/mill ion pounds well fluid for the le as t efficient .
DE PLE TED RESERVOIR
Pre l im ina ry f ie ld s tudies indicate that the well f lu id tem pera ture wi l l
dec rea se ove r a per iod of t im e f ro m 182
C
(360 F ) to 163 C (325 F) . In
ord er to p rov ide fo r th i s even tua li ty , a s e r ie s of cas es were run a t th i s
lower t empera tu re .
hydrocarbon cycle a s the bas e cas e for the 182 C (360
F )
r e s e r v o i r ;
only the amount of well f luid requ ire d to produce
50
MWe net was
changed.
(11. 3 M l b s / h r ) .
The bas e c ase fo r th is s i tua t ion ut i l ized the sa me
The well f luid consumption i ncr eas ed by 63% to 5. 13 M k g / h r
Seve ra l o ther cycles we re invest igated in or de r to improv e on th is , and
it was found that
a
m ix tu re of 3570 pro pa ne and 65% isob utan e w ith a
turb ine inl et condition of 4, 137 kP a (600 ps ia ) and 129 C (265
F )
provided a s ignif icant de cre ase in br ine consumption.
t h i s c a s e i s shown:
A s um m ar y of
Well f luid
Shaf t work 92,255 BHP
G en er al output 67.42 MWe
Pum ping wor k 12.24 MWe
4 ,51 3 ,0 0 0 k g / h r ( 9 ,95 0 ,0 00 l b s / h r )
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 76/126
Ge nera l output
6 2 . 6 9
MWe
Pum ping work 8.10 MWe
Cooling tower work
Net product ion
4.59 MWe
50 .00 MWe
Se ve ral cycles us ing m ixtu res of i sobutane and isopentane we re s tudied,
but the op tim um cycle was found to be a m ixt ure of 90% isopenta ne and
1070 no rm al hexane.
and 174 C (345 F) .
Since the f ield i s a t an elevation of
9 , 0 0 0
feet ,
th i s i s sa fe ly above
a t m o s p he r i c p r e s s u r e .
Th is cyc le was opera ted a t 2 ,482 kPa (360 ps ia )
The condens ing p re ss ur e
i s
102 kPa ( 14 .8 ps ia ) .
A su m m ar y of this cycle
i s
shown below:
W e l l f luid
Shaf t work 76,544 BHP
Ge ne ral output 55.94 MWe
Pum ping wo rk 3. 13 MWe
Cooling tow er wo rk 2.81 MWe
1 ,1 8 5 ,0 0 0 k g / h r ( 2 ,6 12 ,0 0 0 l b s / h r )
Net product ion
50.00
MWe
This cycle shows a 1970 impro veme nt ov er the bas e case .
noted that the working f lu id in th is ca se i s not much dif ferent f r om pur e
isopentane.
would no t be ve r y in fe r io r to th i s cyc le . Th is i s , in fac t , the case .
It shou ld be
It
might be exp ected that a c ycle using isopentane alone
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 77/126
Gene ral output
Pumping w
or
k
Cooling tower work
Net production
61.78 MWe
6.38 MWe
5.40 MWe
50.00 MWe
/-
Sev eral mix tur es of propane and isobutane we re found to be m or e
eff ic ient than the bas e c ase .
isobutane opera ted a t 4 ,137 k Pa (600 ps i a) and 121 C (250
F).
sum ma ry of th is cycle
i s
shown below:
The b es t one w as 5070 prop ane and 5070
A
Well fluid
5 ,006 ,800 kg /h r (1 1 ,0 4 0 ,0 0 0 l b s / h r )
Shaft work
Ge nera l output
Pumping work
Cooling tower work
N e t product ion
92 ,466 BHP
67.58 MWe
11.93 MWe
5.65 MWe
50 .00
MWe
The power product ion of the va r iou s cy cles s tudied ranged f r o m 3.412
to 4. 528 MW e/m illio n pounds of w ell fluid.
COMPOUND CYCLES
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 78/126
e lec t r i c i ty is low.
a t a h igh t em pera tu re to main ta in the t t in - l ine t ' h a rac te r i s t i c of the
p r o c e s s .
in the pr im ar y cycle, and the overa l l e f fic iency of the cycle
i s
general ly l e ss than that of the s imple cycle.
This i s because the p r i m ary cycle mu s t r e jec t hea t
The h igh re jec t t emp era t u re c auses
a
low Car not efficiency
The th i rd poss ib le cycle avoids th is problem.
F i g u r e 4.
the given geothermal f luid.
f r o m the pr im ar y cycle , be low the p inch point, and used to heat a
secondary cycle .
The effective geo ther ma l f luid heating cur ve then
conform s m ore c losely wi th the shape of the hydrocarbon heat ing curve .
If des ired , the sa m e pr inciple can be appl ied to the seco ndary cycle
resul t ing in a three-cyc le proc ess . When evaluat ing the des i rabi l i ty
of a compound cycle,
a s ignif icant inc rea se in perf orm anc e over the
s imple cycle should be observed i n ord er to jus t i fy the addi tional
expens e of equipm ent f o r the s econda ry cycle.
It i s i l l u s t r at e d i n
The p r imary cyc le
i s
se lec ted to be the opt imum cycle for
A s ide s t re am of ge otherm al f lu id i s taken
Two compound c ycles we re s tudied using the bes t s impl e cycle a s a
bas i s ( s ee Tab le
3
). The res ul t s a r e shown below:
Simple Cycle
3.041 MWe/M kg
(7.
518 MW e/M lb s) of well flu id
Dual Cycle
3.341 MWe/M kg (7.381 MWe/M l bs ) of we ll f luid
Treb le Cycle
3. 392 MWe/M kg (7.478 MWe/M lb s) of well f luid
Since fo r a reasonably wel l opt imized ca se the compound cycles fa i led
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 79/126
CON O NS U
COQLIUG
CIZ CULATING
PUMP
F I G UR
SUPERCRITICAL BINARY CYCLE TEMPERATURE-ENTHALPY DIAGRAM
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 80/126
2
4
6 8 1 12 14 16 18
HEAT CONTENT BTU/ WORKING FLUID
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 81/126
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 82/126
FL UID
V PORIZER
OOLlhiG
W TER
CIRCUL TING
TURBO GENERATOR
kl=m
SECOND RY CYCLE
\ /
C O O L 1
NG
._ .
I
WATER
1
CIRCULATING
PUMP
FIGURE
4
THE BEN HOLT CO
'
OMPOUUD
BINARY C Y C L e
DUAL)
<
CPR I
CYCLE POIHTS
T A B L E
2
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 83/126
COND. TEFlP.= 1 0 4 . 4 COND. PRESS.=
57.8
CONDENSEE DUTY= 14i. 'E. 48ETU /=
VAP.
IftLET TEMP.= 103.5 PUMP D I S C H . P =
550 .0
EXP. TEMP.= 31 0 . 0 OP.
PRESS.=
500 .0
EXP OUTLET-
T
= 137.0 P = 59 . s
H
= 146 . 648
V= 1.472355
TC = 786.410 PC = 5 3 1 . 4 7 0 MOL. UT. = 65.14
COMPl X = 0.500 COFlP2
x
= 0.500
C-W
T E M P . = 9 0 . 0 C-W DT 2 6 . 5
CCND. A F ' F E O A C t i
= 14.4
COND. DP 2 . 0
VAP.
HPPEOHCH
= 1 5 . 0 VAP. DP
= 5 0 . 0
EXP. EFF.= 0.650 P u w E F F . = 0 . 8 0 0
H.P. ENTR=
1.1563
L.P. ENTF:=
1.1599
T A B L E
2
( C o n t i n u e d )
HEf i l1
lG C VF 'VE
T 1 = lOS.5
I 1
=
3 237
v
1 =
0.028Z0.1
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 84/126
1 2 = 120.0 t i E =
9.%4
v 2 = 0 . 0 8 y 2
v
3
=
0.0,>.?292
3 =
140:o
H 3
=
21.894
T 4 =
160.6 H
4
=
34.189
v
4 = 0.03nnz.?
T
5
=
180 .0
tl
5
= 46 .903 V
5
=
0. 031 Ciijc.
1 6 =
200 .0
H 6 = 60.114
\
6 E
o.fJ::>rJg;.
1 7 =
220 .0
H 7 =
73.450
V
7 = 0.0?3414
1 8
=
2 4 0 . 0
H 8 =
b3 . 631
v 8 =
0.025136
T 9 =
2 6 0 . 0
t i 3
=
104.618
$/ 9 =
0.037544
T i 0
=
23u.0
H I 0
=
123.
n
,410
=
o.[l41:::Zo
1 1 1
= 290.0
H11
=
134.152
v11
[ I ( lJf583
T i 2 =
316.0
H l Z =
188.0:X V12 = 0.11:+1245
T 1 3 =
317.0 H13 = 190 .155
V 1 3
= 0. 104'335
114
=
315.0 H14 191.476 V14 0.108160
f l 5
= 319.0 H15
=
143.62'3 L'15 = 6.111059
1 1 6 = 320.0 H16
=
195.170 V16
=
0. 113751
1 1 7
=
3 21 .0 H 1 i
=
146.574 4 1 7
=
0.116130
718 = 322.0 4 1 9
=
197.929 v10: = 0 . 1 1 8 4 3
v 1 9
=
0.12(?;24
1 9 = 323.0 H13 = 199. 193
fZO =
324.0 H20 = 200.421 V20
=
O.l i2 .556
721 = 325 .0 921 = 201.553 ' 21
=
0.124551
T22 = 326.6 H2:,>
=
2 0 2 . i S l v2,>
t.&:;G
T 2 3 =
3 2 6 . 7
u >3
;1:14.6:5
;?Is
Ij.12152:
f 2 4 326.; u.24
=
2 0 4 . 6 4 1 . i t 4 =
o
1315.33
. . ~ O
~ 0 ~ ~ ~ . 0 0 0 . . . 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~
I -
TABLE 3
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 85/126
Operat ing
W o r k in g F l u i d P r es su r e
Composi t ion psia
B ase C ase I so bu t ane
Isobutane
80 iC4-20 iC5
80 iC4-20 iC5
80 iC4-20 iC5
80 iC4-20 iC5
20 C3-80 iC4
20 C3 -80 iC4
50 C3-50 iC4
50 C3-50 iC4
80 iC4-20 iC5
50 iC4-50 iC5
50 iC4-50 iC5
50 iC4-50 iC5
50 iC4-50 iC5
50 iC4-50 iC5
50 iC4-50 iC5
30 iC4-70 k iC5
65 iC4-35 iC5
80 iC4-20 iC5
Dual Compound Cycle
Treb le Compound Cycle
D E P L E T E D
B a s e C a s e
-
Isobu tane
2070 C3-80'70 iC4
2070 C3 -80 iC4
20 C3 -80 iC4
80 iC4-20 i C 5
80 iC3-20 iC4
20 C3 -80 iC4
50 C3-50 iC4
50
C3 -50 iC4
35 C3-65 iC4
35 C3-65 iC4
35 C3 -6570 iC4
THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF BINARY GEOTHERMAL POWER CYCLES
CASE STUDY SUMMARY
HEBER RESERVOIR
Operat ing Condensing
T e m p e r a t u r e T e m p e r a t u r e
F
Geothermal F lu id
In let Out let
M
I b s I h r T emp er a t u r e T emp er a t u r e
W o r k ~ n g G e n e r a t o r
Fluid Output
M lbs /h r MWe
u mp ~ n g C o ol i ng T o wer
Work Work
MWe MWe
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 86/126
T AB L E 4
THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF BINARY GEOTHERMAL POWER C YCLE S
CASE STUDY SUMMARY
VALLES CALDERA RESERVOIR
Op er a t i n g Op er a ti n g C o n d en s i n g Geo t h e r ma l F l u i d W o r k i n g Gen er a t o r
P u mp i n g
Cool ing Tower
W o r k i n g F l u i d P r e s su r e T emp er a t u r e T emp e r a t u r e I n l e t Ou t l e t F l u i d Ou t pu t W o r k W o r k
C o mp o s i t i o n p s i a F F M l b s / h r T e m p e r a t u r e T e m p e r a t u r e M lbs /h r MWe MWe MWe
B as e C ase I sob u t an e 6 0 0
80% iC4-10% iC5 600
50% iC4-50% iC5 600
20% iC4-80% iC5 500
80% iC5-20% C6 350
70% iC5-30% C6 320
90% iC5-10% C6 360
I so p en t an e 4 0 0
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 87/126
TABLE 5
THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF BINARY GEOTHERMAL POWER CY CLES
CASE STUDY SUMMARY
RAFT RIVER RESERVOIR
Operating Operating Condensing Geothermal Fluid Working Gene rato r Pumpin g Cooling Tower
Work ing F lu id Pre s s u r e T e mpe ra tu r e T e mpe ra tu r e In let Ou t le t F lu id Ou t~ u t Work Work
Composit ion ps ia F F M lbs hr Tempera ture Temp eratu re M lbs /hr MWe MWe MWe
B a s e C a s e I s obu tane
Propa ne
50 C3-50 iC4
50 C3 -50 iC4
50 C3-50 iC4
50 C3-50 iC4
35 C3-65 iC4
60 C3-40 iC4
60 C3 -40 iC4
ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 88/126
In o rde r to a ss e ss economic feas ib i li ty fo r the th r ee s i t e s , the fol lowing
s t e p s a r e n e c e s s ar y :
Pr ep ar e es t im a tes fo r bo th p lan t and fi e ld ins ta l l a tions fo r each
p r o c e s s at each si te , a tot al of 18 est im ate s.
P r ep ar e opera t ing and main tenance (O&M)cos t e s t im a tes fo r bo th
p lan t and f i e ld ins ta ll a t ion fo r each p roc ess
at
each s i te .
Bas ed on the foregoing es t im ate s , ca lcula te the se l l ing pr ic e of
energy by the p roducer to the u t i li ty fo r each p ro ces s a t each s i t e .
F ina l ly , e s t ima te convers ion and t rans mis s ion cos t s fo r ea ch
p r o c e s s at each s i te .
P re p ar e sensi t iv i ty analys es in ord e r to examine the effec t of
var ious fuel pr ic ing s t r a te gie s on energy and power co sts .
CAP ITAL COSTS
Capi ta l co s t e s t im a tes fo r the th re e Heber convers ion op tions and fo r
one Heber f i e ld ins tal l at ion a r e p resen ted in F i gur es
5 ,
6 ,
7
and
8.
T h e po wer p l a nt c o s t s f o r e a c h p r o c e s s a t He b e r a r e a s f o ll ows :
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 89/126
Million Dollars
F l a s h e d s t e a m
2 6 .
8
B i n a r y 28. 5
Hybrid
36. 6
The se cost s exclude the c ost of land and any cos ts inc urr ed by the
owner ass ocia ted with des ign and construct ion.
The cost of the surfa ce ins ta l la t ion for the b inary plant a t Heber is
es t ima te d to be
$7,800,000.
the injection pum ps, productio n piping, injection piping and relat ed
installat ions.
excluded.
somewhat h igher than would ac tua l ly be incu r red a t the s ta r t .
This co s t inc ludes the down-hole pump s,
The c ost of comp leted productio n and injection we lls i s
The cost is based on end-of-run condit ions and
i s
the re fo re
Tab le 6
ins ta l l a tions a t each s i t e .
cos t e s t im a tes by p ro ra t ing the cos t d i f fe rences in each ca tegory of
wo rk and each piece of equipment.
T h e s e d i f f e re n c e s we r e f u r t h e r
adjus ted to ref le c t loca l condit ions.
T h e e s t i ma t e s
of
t r a n s m i s s i o n
c o s t s a s s u me t h a t a t He b e r , t h e p o wer
i s
t r an smi t ted to a load cen te r
a t
El
Centro;
at
Val les Ca lde ra , the power i s t r ansm i t ted to
Los
Alamos (about
20
mil es ) ; and a t Raf t R iver the power
i s
t r a n s m i t t e d t o
pres en t s cap i ta l cos t s fo r the power p lan ts and t ran sm iss io n
T he p l a n t c o s t s we r e e s t i ma t e d f r o m He b er
dri l l ing condit ions (young volcanic form at ion s , deep wel ls , rem ote
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 90/126
locations).
gue sse s , s ince we have no actua l data.
of
$600,000
i s
c lose to ac tua l pub l ished d r i ll ing cos t s fo r the a re a .
In th is cas e the wel l co s ts a r e nothing m or e than educated
The co st of R aft Riv er wel ls
In each case, we have as sum ed that about 20% of the deve lopmen t we lls
wil l be d ry holes.
eas i ly be low fo r a young volcanic form at ion l ike V al les Ca ldera .
Again , th is f igur e i s an educated gue ss and could
T o t al we ll c o s t s v a r y f r o m a low of $5. 9 mil l ion for the Heber b inary
p r o c e s s t o a hi gh of $24. 2 mil l ion for the Raf t River f lash plant.
The surfa ce ins ta l la t ion co sts ( including down-hole pumps fo r Heb er
and Raft Ri ve r) var y f r om a low of $5. 9 mil l ion
at
Heber
to
a high of
$18 mill ion a t Raft River.
FI EL D O PERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS
Table
9
pr es en ts es t im ate s of f ie ld opera t ing and maintenance cos ts
fo r the n ine cases .
Table 8.
f ield office burden and G&A i s est im ate d to be $253,000.
cons ide red th i s cos t to be a constant for a l l cases .
The es tim at e of the f ield staff portion
is
shown in
The annual cost of the f ield staff including s al ar ie s, benefits ,
We have
Produc ing we l l ma intenance co s t s a r e e s t im a ted f ro m suggest ions
made by Chevron fo r Heber a s fo llows :
2.
Ma j or r e me d i a l we l l wo r k
is
done once eve ry two ye ar s for each
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 91/126
wel l
at a
co s t of $80,000.
3 .
One injection well will be abandoned by the end of the p roj ec t
at
a
co st of $50,000.
C o s t s f o r all o t h e r cases we re p ro ra ted by the number
of wells.
Annual surface- ins ta l la t ion maintenance ( labor and mater ia ls)
i s
calcu-
la ted at four perc ent of the in i t ia l capi ta l cos t fo r Heber and Raf t
R i v e r, w h e re th e w e ll s a r e p u l p e d ,
and two percent a t Val les Ca ldera
wh ere they a r e not.
Down-hole su rveys a r e f igured a t $1,000 pe r ye a r pe r we l l.
The c ost of pumping e lec t r ic i t y was f igur ed a t 2. 0 cents /kwh.
the pumped wel l s th i s cos t r ep r ese n t s abou t one- th i rd of the to ta l
opera t ing and maintenance expense .
F o r
Tota l f i e ld operat ing and main tenance expense va r i es f ro m $ 1 ,2 6 3 ,0 0 0
p e r y e a r f o r t h e Va ll e s C a l d e r a b i n a r y pl a nt t o
a
high
of
$4,181,000
fo r the Raf t R iver f l a sh p lan t.
The monthly opera t ing and maintenance co sts (excluding pow er) p e r
wel l a r e in the range o f $6,000, near ly twice a s h igh a s would be
e x p e c te d f o r
a typical
oil w ell .
COST
O F
GEOTHERMAL POWER
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 92/126
In es t im at ing the cost of geoth erm al power de l ivered to a uti l i ty load,
we a s s u me t h a t
a
pr iva te ly owned p roducer wi l l se l l the rm al energy
to an investor-owned publ ic u t i l i ty who wil l own and ope ra te the power
p lan t and t ransm iss io n l ines .
Thus , the r e a r e th r ee e lements of cos t
to be considere d.
1.
Pr od uce r ' s se l ling p r i ce of the rm al energy to the u ti li ty
2. The ut i l i ty 's cos t of genera t ing e lec t r i c i ty
3 .
The u t i l i ty ' s t r ans mi ss io n cos t to
a
load cen te r
T h e r e i s
a
minim um sel l ing pr ic e below which
a
producer would not
rece ive an adequa te re t u rn on h i s inves tment an d /o r an adequate
incent ive to continue an explora t ion pro gr am and theref ore would not
en te r in to
a
c o n t r a c t t o s e l l t h e r ma l e n er gy .
T h e r e
i s
a l s o
a
maximum p r ic e which
a
ut i l i ty can afford to pay for the
the rmal energy .
T h e P r o b l e m
The p rob lem to be add ress ed in th i s s tudy
i s
two-fold in scope.
f i r s t a s p e c t i s to e s t ima te the cos t o f geo the rma l power fo r th re e
p r o c e s s e s
at
the th re e s i t e s . The es t im a tes mu s t be made on a
The
1.
The geological and geophysical metho ds used successfully in oil
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 93/126
2.
3 .
4.
5.
and gas exp lo rat ion a r e not nec essa r i ly use fu l o r may requ i re
som e adapta tion to be useful in a geotherm al environment.
Drilling technology i s abou t the sa me ,
except f or the effect of
tem pera tu re and the p rob lems assoc ia ted with d r i ll ing th rough
rock ra the r than sed imenta ry fo rmat ion .
Oi l and gas ma y be t r a nspo r ted to mar ke t and both a r e so ld in
nat ional and in ternat ional m ar ke ts through wel l es tabl ishe d
marke t ing channe ls , whe reas g eo the rma l energy mus t be so ld to
a uti l i ty who will build the power plant in the producing field.
Thus , the producer can ge t no i n co me f r o m a g e o t h e r ma l
res e rv o i r un ti l the power p lan t
i s
buil t and operating.
The ut i li ty must have conf idence that the re se rv oi r wi l l furni sh
the rm al energy for an extended per io d of t im e (normal ly
30
y e a r s ) .
T i t l e to the geo the rm al wa te r
i s
not wel l es tabl ished , unlike oil
a nd ga s r e s e r v o i r s wh e r e t h e r e i s se ldom the p rob lem
of
owner -
ship.
Thus , the r i sk fa c to rs a r e d i f fe ren t be tween exp lora t ion and deve lop-
ment of o i l and gas on the one hand and geot herm al res er vo ir s on the
o the r hand , bu t the sam e cos t -o f - se rv ic e approach used in the o i l
indus t ry may be used fo r e s t ima t ing the cos t
of
fuel.
W e
have developed
a
compu ter pr og ra m which calcula tes the cost of
f luid requ i r ed a t a given si te . A knowledge of the reservoir
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 94/126
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s wil l indicate the nec ess ary num ber of product ion
and in jec tion wel ls , the f ie ld layout and the r eq uir ed col lec t ion
and d istr i buti on piping. With th is informat ion, the var iou s costs
involved with br inging the f ie ld in to product ion can then be
es t ima ted .
2. Capita l Inve s me n t
The cap i ta l inves tment fo r a g e o t h e r ma l p r o j e c t is the money
requ i red by the p ro jec t fo r which a r e tu rn on inves tment is
expected.
that none of the se funds a r e obtained by borrowing.
ponents of th e c api ta l investment a r e a s fo llows:
F o r the pur pos es of th is invest igat ion,
it
i s a s s u m e d
The com-
a.
Ex do ra t i on and Land Acau is it ion Cos t s
This rep res ent s the money spent in geological and geophysical
re se a r ch , exp lo ra to ry d r i l l ing , bonus payments and o the r
cos t s invo lved with es tab l i sh ing the p re senc e of an exploitable
g e o t h e r ma l r e s e r v o i r . S in ce t h e r e s e r v o i r wil l t y pi c al ly b e
suff ic iently lar ge to supply m or e than one power p lant , only
a p ropo rtion al a mou nt of
this
c h a r g e
i s
ass igned to the
pro ject under considera t ion.
to the f ie ld development phase .
T h e s e c o s t s a r e i n c u r r e d p r i o r
b. Well Dril l in g Cos ts
The cap i ta l investments l i s t ed above a r e expected to r e tu rn
a
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 95/126
prof i t com mens ura te wi th the r i s ks invo lved in a geo the rm al
venture .
cash-f low method i s used to de te rmine the annua l r evenue re qu i r e -
ments .
To account fo r the t ime value of m oney, the discounted-
3 .
Expenses
Se ve ra l types of expens es a r e inc urr ed dur ing the opera t ion of
a
producing geo the rm al f i e ld . These fa l l in to two c las ses : cash
exp ense s and book expenses. The book expen ses a r e not deducted
f r om the revenues bu t a r e used in de te rmin ing the t axab le income
for fe dera l and s ta te income taxes .
a . Cash Expenses
(1) Royal ty Pay men t
Royal ty payme nts
a r e
typical ly
12.
57 0
of
t h e g r o s s
revenues .
(2) Opera t ing Expen ses
Annual opera t ing expenses include labo r , maintenance,
suppl ies , u t i l i t ies , e tc .
b. Book Exp ense s
3 )
Depletion Allowance
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 96/126
Thi s deduct ib le expense ,
s imi la r
to deprecia t ion, we
a s s u me t o be
2 2 %
of gr os s revenue.
been rule d appl icable to geot herm al in genera l .
However,
i t
has not
4. Taxes
Fe der a l , s t a te and loca l t axes wi l l be pa id by the p ro jec t .
f ede ra l and s ta te income taxes a r e pa id accord ing to the ne t
taxable income.
deduc ted f ro m the f ede ra l income tax .
tangible,
deprecia ble as se ts of the pro ject . The s ta te and loca l
re a l p rope r ty t axes a r e genera l ly charged accord ing to the va lue
of the r ea l proper ty .
revenues produced by that proper ty .
The
A f e d e r a l i n v e st me n t tax cred i t of ten perce nt i s
The c red i t i s based on the
This
i s
judged to be
a
func tion of the
T h u s, t h e s e t a x e s a r e us u al ly
a
percentag e of the gr os s revenues .
They a r e t r ea te d as an ad va lo re m tax of t e n pe rcen t in th i s s tudy .
5. Annual Cash Flow
The cas h flow i s the s a les revenues minus t axes and expenses not
including depreciation.
addit ion, this
i s
a l so sub t rac ted f ro m the cash flow.
flow i s then discounted
at
the des i red ra te of r e t u rn to
a
p r e s e n t
wor th
at
the beginning of power plant ope ratio ns. The annual
Since there i s a l so an annual cap i ta l
The cash
1.
Re tu rn on Inves tment
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 97/126
2.
3 .
4.
5.
C u r r e n t c ap i t al r e q u ir e me n t s a r e i n the range of 11 to
1 3
percen t .
Income Tax
The method used take s the expected annual taxes ove r the l i fe of
the power p lant inc luding provis ions f or in vestm ent tax cred i t and
in t e re s t deduc tions and conver t s them to a un i form annua l
"levelized" expense.
a 5 0 - 5 0 deb t /equ i ty ra t io .
A n i n t e r e s t r a t e of nine pe rcen t i s used with
DeDreciation
The deprecia t ion expense
i s
often ca lcula ted by the s t ra ight- l in e
method, but for economic ana lys is the s inking-fund method
i s
general ly used.
ca se use s the s inking-fund method (a t the ra te of re tu rn) .
The p r og ra m can use e i the r me thod , bu t the base
Ad Va l o r e m Tax
T h i s a c c o u n t s f o r t h e v a r i o u s p r o p e r t y a n d a d v a l o r e m t a x e s .
typical value
i s
2. 5% of ca pita l cost .
A
Admin is t ra t ive and G enera l Expense
This
i s
typical ly one pe rce nt of capi ta l cos t .
or de r to obta in good re la t iv e values but ma y not rep res en t bes t
absolute values.
These cas es a r e based on the fo llowing assumptions:
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 98/126
Pr oje ct l i fe 25
Explora t ion cost , K
$
800
Le ase bonus payment none
P r o d u c e r ' s
D C F
ra te of retu rn ,
70
15
Util i ty rat e of re tur n,
7 0
12
Depletion,
70
2 2
W rite -off of intangib le dr ill ing exp ens e,
70 7 0
Wr ite -off of dry- ho les exp ens e, 70 100
The pro du cer 's capi ta l c os ts and opera t ing and maintenance (O &M)
c o s t s ,
togethe r wi th the u t i l i ty 's capi ta l cos ts and
O&M
cos t s , were
taken fo r each case f rom Tab les 6 , 7, 9 and 11.
taken as the typical values repor te d in the preceding sect ion. The
resu l t s a re t abu la ted in Table 13.
Other input data we re
The Heber b inary case shows the lowest fuel cos t of the three Heber
cases (16 .
6 9
mil ls /k wh ) and the lowest power cost (35.
22
mi l l s / k wh ) .
T h e s e i n c r e a s e s a r e o f f s e t t o
a
l a rge ex ten t by the dec rease d b r ine
requirements of 1 . 19 M kg / h r ve rs us
3 .
1 M k g / h r ( 2 . 6 2 M l b s / h r
f
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 99/126
v e r s u s 6 . 9 M l b s / h r ) .
Raft River cos ts a re h igh in a l l counts , ref lec t ing the low tem per atu re
of the re se rv oi r as compared to the o the rs .
Ut il i ty f ixed ch arge s p lus O&M expenses vary f ro m a l i t t le ov er 18
mills
(Heber b ina ry ) to a l i t t l e over
20 mills
(Raf t R iver b ina ry ) .
var ia t ion is not nea r ly
as
grea t a s the va r ia t ion in fue l cos t fo r the
best cases , 16 . 0 mills to
3 2 .
8 mil ls .
This
F u e l c o s t e x p r e s s e d as cen ts /M Btu ex t rac ted is in the ra ng e of 6 0
cen ts /M Btu a t Heber , inc reas ing to about
80
cen ts /M Btu a t Val les
C a l d e r a , o r o v e r $ 1.OO/M Btu a t Raft Ri ve r.
We e l imina ted hybr id sy s tem s f r om fu r the r cons ide ra t ion s ince hybr id
cos t s wer e h igher than the o the r s .
al though the hybrid fuel c ost w as low at the th ree s i t e s ,
the power
plant w a s the m os t expensive . One reas on for the h igh c os t power
plant
is
tha t we have provided s epa ra t e turbine -gen era t or ins ta l la t ions
for both the s t eam -f l ash and binary sect ions of the p lant , If it we r e
poss ible to put both tur bine s and a single ge ner ato r on one shaft , the
capi ta l cos t would be reduced considera bly . This pros pect requ ire s
fu r th e r s tudy .
It should be noted in pass ing that ,
Raf t River cos ts a r e impo rtant as an indicat ion of cos t s whic hm ay be
expec ted in developing low - tem pera tu re res e rv o i r s .
It
is
c lea r tha t
Sensit ivity Analysis
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 100/126
W e have p rev ious ly s ta ted tha t the power cos t s p res en ted i n Tab le
13
a r e expec ted to g ive good re la t ive va lues be tween re se rv o i r s and
be tween p ro ces ses , bu t a r e no t necessa r i ly val id in abso lu te sense .
Accord ingly, we have ma de a stu dy of the effect of ch ange s in key
var iab les enter ing in to the economic model.
W e
have l imi ted these
com paris ons to the Heber b ina ry plant .
in Table 14.
These res u l t s a re t abu la ted
C a s e
2
as su m es that we have ov eres t ima ted f i e ld cap i ta l and
operat ing co sts by
20 .
16. 7 mil ls to 13. 5 mills and the power c o s t f r o m
35.
2 mil l s t o 32 .
0
m i l l s .
The effect
i s
t o r e d u c e t he f u e l c o s t f r o m
C a s e 3 assumes that we have underes t imated f ie ld
capital
and operating
cos t s by
20010,
in which case fuel cos t and power cost in cr ea se by
3 . 2
mil l s .
In ca se 4 , we as su m e that no wel ls wi l l be d r i l led dur ing the l i fe of
the project , there by reducing fuel cos t by 0. 8 mill
In cases 5 and 6 , we have var ie d the pr od uc er 's ra te of r e t ur n down
to 10% and up 200/0.
and the h igher ra te of r e t ur n in cr ea se s fuel cos t by 3 .5 m il l s .
T he l o we r r a t e o f r e t u r n r e d u c e s f u e l c o st 3 m i l l s ,
In case 7, the effect of el iminatin g both depletion and intangible wri te -
off i s to inc rea se fuel cos t by 4. 1 mi l l s .
F r o m t h e f o r eg o in g , it
i s
app aren t tha t the predic t io n of power cos ts
m ay va ry widely depend ing on the pa r t i c u la r se t of a ssumpt ions
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 101/126
ente ring into the calculation.
The anal yse s do not take in to account that only pre l im ina ry opt i-
mizat ion of the plant des ign ha s been made.
im por tant point , s inc e we did not have producing cos ts available
when the p re l im inar y op t imiza tion s tud ies w ere made ,
p re sen t judgment
i s
tha t the opt imum design wil l be in the
dire ctio n of hig her power plant c ost s and lower brin e consumption.
We think that the co st red uctions ass oc iat ed with optimizatio n of
the b inary cycle wi l l be g re at er than by opt imizat ion of the f lash
cycle.
Th is
i s
a pa r t i cu la r ly
Ou r
No
recogni t ion i s given to the economies which may resu l t f r om a
fu l l development of the r ese rvo i r .
expenses in pa r t i cu l a r wi l l be sp read over a wider base .
Overhead and maintenance
No a l lowance i s made fo r inc r ease d p lan t cap i ta l and opera t ing
c o s t s
which
m a y
be
i n c u r r e d
a t
t he
end
of
t he
p ro jec t
due
t o
t empera tu re dec l ine .
sav ings resu l t ing f ro m fu l l f i e ld deve lopment .
This fa c tor w i l l be offse t somewhat by the
We cannot hope to know a s much about a pro du ce r 's o r
a
ut i l i ty 's
b u s i n es s p r a c t i c e s a n d c o s ts a s t h e s e f i r m s do themselves .
Th eir m ethods of economic analys es may provide s ignif icant ly
d i f fe ren t number s
while the b inar y p r oc es s can a l te r i t s opera t ing condit ions to min im ize
the increa se . The e f fec t of decre as ing temp era tur e can be se en in the
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 102/126
com par iso n of the pro ce ss es a t Raft Riv er where the c os t of power by
t he f l a sh e d s t e a m p r o c e s s
i s
1 5
m i l l s o r
22
higher than the binary
p r o c e s s .
r ecomm end tha t t he b ina ry p r oce s s shou ld be in s t a l l ed a t t he H ebe r
si te .
On the ba si s of th is difference in the cost
of
power, we
F u e l Pr i ci n g S t r a t e m
A
cont ract fo r the sa le of fu el by a produce r to a uti l i ty i s l ike a
m a r r i a g e w h e r e d i vo r c e
i s
imposs ib le .
option of changing to a new se ll er o r a new buye r.
different busin ess object ives and philosophies .
to gove rnment act i ons of one kind o r another .
a ma jo r e f fec t on the i r respec t ive cos ts .
t h e p r o d u c e r ' s c o s t s a r e a f fe c te d i n a maj or way by government
regu lat ion s with res pe ct to deplet ion, wri te-off of in tangible dr i l l i ng
cos t s , f ede ra l and s t a t e income t ax r a t e s , p rope r ty t ax r a t e s and
income tax c red i t s . U t il ity cos ts a r e a f fec ted by
all
of the for ego ing
(except those re la t ing to deplet ion and intangible dr i l l in g co st s) , and
the i r inco me i s con t ro l led by the publ ic u t i l ity com miss ion .
a f fec ted in d i f fe ren t ways by many o ther agenc ies respons ib le fo r
enforc ing env i ronmenta l , sa fe ty and hea l th s tandards .
N e i the r pa r ty ha s the p rac t i c a l
E a c h p a r t y h a s
E a c h p a r t y
i s
subject
Thes e regu la t ions have
As
we have a l rea dy observed ,
B oth a r e
In our view the app roach to
a
contr act begins with a good-fai th
negotia t ion as to the s ta r t i ng fue l se l l ing pr ic e between the par t ie s ,
FIGURE 5
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 103/126
E S T I M A T E S U M M A R Y S H E E T
CUSTOMER
DATE
4/Z2/76
TOTAL
LOCATION Heber, Celifo:
ACCOUNT
ia
Materials
REV. NO.
0
Labor
ubcontract
I100
I200
1300
I400
IS00
I600
I700
I800
I900
2800
Columns (incl. trays)
Pressure Vessels
Heat Exchangers
F urnace/Heaters
Pumps
Boilers
Cooling Towers
Turbine
&
Generator
Tanks
Other
Labor
213,000
2,700,000
213,000
2,700,000
i ,132,000
1,132,000
1,800,000
155,000
200,00000,000
7 900 000
200,000
1,640,000
360,000
400,000
TOTAL MAJOR EQUIPMENT
3100 Concrete
3200 Pipe, Valves, Fit tings
3300 Structural Steel
3400 Instruments
3500 Painting
3600 Electrical
3700 Insulation
3800 Paving, Roads, Fences &
3900 Buildings
200,000
210,000
1 000 000
200,000
40, 000
9 900
7
000
410 000
2,700,000
600,
50,000
460,000
1,875,000
255 030
200,000
200,000
60,000
60 000
50,
ooo
650,000
255
,
00
80 000
200 000
1,225,000
.sc .
20,000
100 000
FIGURE 6
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 104/126
E S T I M A T E S U M M A R Y S H E . E T
CUSTOMER
LOCATION
Heber,
Cal i f (
ACCOUNT
I100 Columns (incl. trays)
I200 Pressure Vessels
1300 Heat Exchangers
1400 Furnace/Heaters
1500
Pumps
1600 Boilers
1700 Cooling Towers
1800
Turbine
&
Generator
I900
Tanks
2800 Other
-
Vacuum
Equip
and
etc.
Labor
TOTAL MAJOR EQUIPMENT
3100 Concrete
3200 Pipe, Valves, Fit tings
3300 Structural Steel
3400 Instruments
3500 Painting
3600 E:ectrical
3700
Insulation
3800 Paving, Roads, Fences
&
3900 Buildings
i a
Materials
283,000
1,280,000
451,000
6
80,000
406
, 00
9 30°
J
Oo0
200,000
750
,
00
200,000
300
, oo
sc .
10,000
subcontract
1,600,000
200,000
1, aoo, ooo
10,000
100 000
50,
00
425,000
200,000
100, 00
200,000
XEV.NO. 0
Labor
400,000
400
,
350,000
400,000
100,000
30
, 00
90,000
D A T E 4 22 76
TOTAL
283,000
1,280,000
451,000
1,600,000
7 080 000
406,000
400,000
11, 500,000
550,000
1,160,000
300,
b30 ooo
50,
coo
1,375,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
F I G U R E 7
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 105/126
L O C A T ~ O N
Heber, California
ACCOUNT
I100 Columns (incl. trays)
1300 Heat Exchangers
1400 Furnace/Heaters
IS00 Pumps
1600 Boilers
1800 Turbines
&
Generators
1900 Tanks
2800 Other - Vacuum
Equip.
1200 Pressure Ve ssels
1700
Cooling Towers
and etc.
Labor
TOTAL MAJOR EQUIPMENT
3100 Concrete
3200
Pipe. Valves, Fittings
3300 Structural Steel
3400 Instruments
3500 Painting
3600
Electrical
3800 Paving, Roads, Fences
8c
3700 Insulation
3900
Buildings
E S T I M A T E S U M M A R Y S H E E T
Materials Subcontract
272,000
2,i15,000
1,135
,
00
1,600,000
5,OOO,OOO
498,000 50,000
9,020,000 1,650,000
200 000
2,160,000 59, 00
562,000
425,000
171,000
50,000
1,317,000 701,000
h ’ i SC . 300,
oo
3332
00
324,000
REV.NO. 0
Labor
271,000
271,000
440,000
2,206,000
354,000
41,000
-==qOTAL
272,000
2,115,000
1
35
000
1,600,000
5,000,000
548,000
271,000
10,941,000
640
00
4,425, 00
916,000
637,000
50,
00
2,018,000
333,000
300,000
324,000
FIGURE 8
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 106/126
E S T I M A T E S U M M A R Y S H E E T
I O 8
NO. 7523
CUSTOMER EPR1
' LANT
REV.NO. n DATE
4/22/76
Productior. L I n j e c t i o n
LOCATION Heber , Ca l i fo
ACCOUNT
ia
Materials
Labor
TO TAL
ubcontract
I100
I 200
1300
1400
I500
1600
I700
I800
I900
2 8 0 0
Columns ( inc l . t rays)
Pressure Vessels
Heat Exchangers
Furnace/Heaters
Pumps
Bo i le rs
Cool ing Towers
Compressors
Tanks
Other
Labor
70,000
1,411,000
70 000
1,411,000
1,000
1 000
53 000
3 000
1,482,000
13,000
884,000
1,535,000
51,000
1,581,000
53 000
18,000
677,000
T O T A L M A JO R E Q U I P M E NT
3 100 Concrete
3200 Pipe, Valves, F i t t i ngs
3300 Structu ral Steel
3400 Instruments
3500 Paint ing
3600 E lec t r i ca l
3700
I nsu la t i on
3800
Pav ing, Roads , Fen ces&
3900 Bui ld ings
20,000
149,000
440,000
10,000
217,000
281,000
455, 00
5,000
630,000
10 000
217,000
190,000
sc:.
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 107/126
TABLE 6
ESTIMATED POWER PLANT AND TRANSMISSION CAPITAL COSTS
(AL L FIGURES IN
$
K)
HEBER
BINARY
FLASHED STEAM
HYBRID
VALLES CALDERA
BINARY
PLANT
2 8 , 5 0 0
2 6 , 8 0 0
3 6 , 6 0 0
2 6 , 5 0 0
TRANSMISSION
5 0 0
500
5 0 0
1 , 9 0 0
I T E M
T ABL E
7
E S T I M AT E D I NI T I AL F I E L D CAP I T AL COS T S
ALL COSTS IN K
HE BE R VAL L E S CAL DE RA
R A F T R I V E R
BINARY FLASH HYBRID BINARY FLASH HYBRID BINARY F LASH HYBRID
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 108/126
P RODUCING WE L L S
No. o f Wel l s Co s t / W el l
C o s t
I NJE CT I ON WE L L S
No . o f Wel l s Co s t / We l l
C o s t
DRY HOL E S
No. o f Wel l s Co s t I W el l
C o s t
W E L L C O ST
T O T A L F I E L D C O ST 11 800 14 350 12.200
1.
I n c l u d es d o wh -h o l e p u m p s a t Heb er an d Raf t R i v er
TABLE 8
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 109/126
POSITION
FIEL D OPERATORS
ESTIMATED FIEL D STA FF COST
(ALL FIELDS)
R.OUS TA BOU T
E L E
C TR.IC-N
INSTRUMENT SPECIA LIST
MECHANIC
FOREMAN
OF FIC E MANAGER
NO. O F RATE RATE
HIRES $/MONTH
$/MONTH
4
1 ,000 4,000
1 1,000 1,000
2 1 ,200 2,400
1 1,500
1,500
1
1,000 1 ,000
T A B L E 9
ESTIMATED F IEL D OPERATI NG AND MAINTENANCE COSTS
(A LL FI GUR ES IN YEAR)
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 110/126
I T E M
HE B E R VAL L E S C ALDE RA R AF T R IVER
BINARY FLASH HYBRID
FLASH HYBRID
INARY FLAS H HYBRID BINARY
FIE L D L ABOR
(INCLUDING OVERHEAD G A)
2 5 3 2 5 3 2 5 3 2 5 3 2 5 3 2 5 3 2 5 3 2 5 3 2 5 3
PRODUCING WELL MAINTENANCE 3 6 8 4 9 1 3 9 8 3 3 7 42 8 3 68 5 2 1 7 6 7 6 7 5
INJ E C T ION W E L L M AINT E NANC E
3
93
5 2 4 3 9 3
SURFACE INSTALLATION MAINTENANCE
2 3 6 2 5 6 2 4 0
DOWN HOLE S URVEYS 1 8 24 1 9
M ISC E LL ANE OUS SUPPL IE S
4 0 5 3 4 5
PURCHASED POWER 6 6 5 8 8 5 7 0 2
T OT AL S
1 973 2 . 4 8 6 2 , 0 5 0
TABLE 10
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 111/126
POSITION
ESTIMATED POWER PLANT LABOR COST
OPERATORS
LABORER
ELECTRICIAN
INSTRUMENT SPECIALIST
MECHANIC
OFFICE MANAGER
SUPERINTENDENT
NO. O F RATE RATE
HIRES $/MONTH $/MONTH
9 1,000 9 , 0 0 0
1 750 750
2
1
1
1 ,200
1,000
2,000
2,400
1 ,000
2,000
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 112/126
T A B L E
12
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 113/126
INPUT URTR
T A B L E 1 2 ( C o n t i n u e d )
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 114/126
PA Y OUT E 1 Y E A P I :
TABLE 13
ESTIM ATED GEOTH ERMAL POWER COST BASE CASES
B r ine Fue l Cos t Power Cos t (mi l s lkwh)
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 115/126
Rate
d
pe r pe r F ixed Operat ing
C a s e
Heber
K / h r
K
Br ine M Btu Fue l Charges Main tenance T ransm is s ion To ta l
B inary
F l a s h e d S t e a m
Hybrid
n Val les Caldera
Binary
F l a s h e d S t e a m
Hybr id
Raf t R iver
B inary
F l a s h e d S t e a m
Hybr id
TABLE 14
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS - GEOTHERMAL POWER COST
BASIS: HE BE R BINARY
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 116/126
Conditions
Power Cos t
-
m i l s l k w h
Fixed Operat ing
F u e l
Charg es Main tenance T ra nsm iss io n To ta l
Ba se Case includes deplet ion 16. 7 15 . 0 3 . 2
and intangibles wr i t e -of f )
Lower Field Capi tal and
13 . 5
15.
0 3 . 2
Overhead Maintenance -
207 0
Higher Fie ld Capi tal and 19 . 9 15 . 0 3 . 2
Overhead Maintenance - 207 0
Fiel d Decl ine - 070
15.
9 15 . 0
3 . 2
Fiel d Rate of Re turn - 1070 13. 7 15. 0
3 . 2
Fiel d Rate of Retu rn -
2070
2 0 . 2 1 5. 0 3 . 2 0 . 3 3 8. 7
No Deple tion Intangib les
20.8 15. 0 3 . 2
Depletion Only
17. 6
15 .
0 3 . 2
Intangibles Only
19. 9 15 . 0 3 . 2
Pro je c t L i fe
- 2 0
Y e a r s
17. 1
15.
2
3 . 2 0 . 3 35 . 8
Pro jec t L i f e
- 3 0
Y e a r s
1 6 . 5 15 . 0 3 . 2 0 . 3 35 . 0
Powe r Plant Rate of Retu rn - 1070
16 . 7 12 . 3 . 2
Powe r Plant Rate of Return - 147 0 16 . 7 17. 6 3.2
IDENTIFICATION OF TECHNOLOGY WEAKNESSES
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 117/126
The re app ear to be no se r io us t echnology weaknesses a ssoc ia ted wi th
the design of st ea m- fla sh cycles.
opera t ion for a num ber of y ea rs i n New Zealand, Japan and Mexico.
Es tab l i shed steam tu rb ine manufac tu re r s o f fe r
two
tage, double-entry
s te am tu rb ines on a guaran teed pe r fo rm ance bas i s . Cor ros io n and
eros ion have been a pro blem but not a se r io us h indrance .
Such plants have been in succ essf ul
No bina ry cycle p lants have be en bui lt in
this
country. The Rus sian s
a r e r e p o r t e d t o ha v e
a
small plan t in geo the rmal se rv ice , and the
Japane se have
a
3 .8 MWe p lan t r ecover ing energy f ro m was te hea t
and employ ing Fre on a s
a
working fluid.
soon be in opera t ion in the Im pe r ia l Valley .
nominal 10 MWe isobu tane te s t loop but no expansion turbine.
the except ion of the expansion turbine , the m ajo r equipment
i s
avai lable
l ines .
The Niland te s t fac i l i ty wi l l
This plant contains a
With
. f r o m e s t ab l i sh e d ma n u f a c t u r e r s
as a
p a r t of the i r s t andard p roduc t
HYDROCARBON TU RBINES
Both axial and rad ia l tu rb ines have been p roposed fo r th i s p ro jec t .
Bo th types of tu rb ines have been used in indus t ry fo r m any yea rs and
a r e consider ed to be safe and re l iable . However , ne i ther type of
The Radia l Turbine
The Rotoflow Co rpo ratio n ha s pro pos ed to supply a 6 5 MWe turbine
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 118/126
ins ta l la t ion mad e up
of
th ree rad ia l tu rb ine e lements .
would c on si st of a single-flow turbine in one casing and a dual-flow
turbine in a second cas ing, all mounted on a single shaft .
The assem bly
Rotoflow i s exper ien ced in the des ign of radia l turbines in hydrocarbon
s e r v i c e .
capa ble of deli veri ng 7 MWe of e le ct ri c powe r.
would cons ist of th re e turb ine wheels
e a c h r a t e d a t 22 MWe. Thu s, the
scale -up of the turbine e lemen t
i s
about 3 /1 . This degr ee of sca l e-up
does not app ear to rep re se nt a ma jor change in turbine des ign. How-
e v e r , it does re pr es en t an extension of the pr es en t s ta t e of the a r t and
wil l require fur ther engineer ing development .
The la rg es t unit they have bui lt i s a single-flow turb ine
The proposed unit
An independent design effort by qualif ied consultants, comp aring the
two types of tu rbin es and evaluat ing f inal prop osal s , app ear s to be
justif ied.
Speed Control
Al l the tu rb ines p roposed by vendors a r e des igned to opera te a t 3600
rpm and wil l not need a speed -reducing gear . The turbi nes wi l l be
brought up to speed before the ge nera tor i s connected to the e lec t r i ca l
t r a n s m i s s i o n s y st em .
After it i s connected, i t wil l cont inue to ro ta te
at rpm,
the s tea m tu rb ine con t ro l sys tem to a hydrocarbon tu rb ine may be
encountered. While th is pro blem i s not in our judgment a s e r i o u s
con stra int , a study by qualif ied consulta nts ma y be justif ied.
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 119/126
DOWN-HOLE
P U MP S
The pumps
so
f a r u s e d t o p r o d uc e g e o t h e r ma l fl ui d f r o m i n t e r me d i a t e
tem pera tu re we l l s a r e modi fied deep-well pumps which cons i s t of a n
e l e c t r i c mo t o r d r i v e l o c a te d
at
the w el l head,
a
long shaft s tabil ized
by bear in gs loca ted a long its length, and
a
mult i -s tage centr i fugal
pump located
at
the ba se of the shaft. Th is type of pum p ha s been
used success ful ly in Ice land in supplying hot wate r to the Ci ty of
Reykjavik.
f i l t e red wa te r f ro m the su r face down the bea r ing tub ing , the reby p ro -
tec t ing the bea r ing s f ro m contact wi th the wel l fluid.
m ate r ia l s a r e ava ilab le fo r f ab r ica t ion of the bowls, imp e l le r s and
pump bear ings .
Heber us ing the same type of pump and solved more o r l e s s successful ly .
Shaf t -bear ing wear ha s been minim ized by pumping
Suitable
Various d i f f icul t ies w er e exper ien ced by Chevron a t
We regard this type of pump as the on ly s ta te -o f - the -a r t pump
avai lable but recognize that succ essf ul low maintenance opera t ion may
not be rea l i z ed fo r som e time .
Othe r pumps have b een proposed w hich would e l iminate the shaft
lubr ica t ion problem.
follows:
T h e d i f f er e n t t e c h ni c a l a p p r oa c h e s a r e a s
. .
-
. . .
-
. . .
.
. . .
. .. .
.
-. . .
.
SCALE
DEPOSITION
The deposit ion of sca le on hea t exchanger tube s occ ur s when geo-
the rm al f lu ids a r e coo led to the i r sa tu ra t ion point .
A
se r i es of te s ts
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 120/126
we re pe r fo rmed a t the Heber re se r vo i r in 1976 to mea sur e the ef fec t
of s cal e deposit ion on heat exchanger perfo rma nce. The res ul ts of
the se te s t s indicated that sca le deposi t ion does occu r on the tubes .
The amount of sca le fo rmed dur ing the t e s t s was sma l l , bu t it was
suffi cient to show that the ra te of format ion inc rea sed a s the
tem per atu re of the br in e was reduced.
the longe st one was 22 days , and the da ta f r om th i s r e la t ive ly shor t -
range t e s t was ex t rapo la ted to p red ic t pe r fo rmance over a ye a r .
Fu r th e r ex tended dura t ion hea t exchanger t e s t s appear jus t if i ed to
est abl ish the ra te of deposit ion of sca le
as
a function of t e mp e r a t u r e
and t ime.
The te s t s var ied in length , but
CORROSION
Eac h of the geoth erm al f lu ids d i f fer f r om one another in sa l in i ty , pH
and concentration of anions and cations. Eve n different we lls in the
sam e re se rv o i r can p roduce f lu ids with d i ffe ren t chemica l p roper t i e s .
The cor ros ive chara c te r i s t i c s of each rese r vo i r should be es tab l i shed
before the f inal materia ls se lec t ion fo r the p lant take s p lace .
should be conducted for
a
sufficient leng th of t im e to identify
if
oxi-
dat ion, s t re s s corros ion, o r p it t ing could be expected in the p lant.
Different m at er ia ls should be te s te d to es tab l ish what degre e of
cor ros ion protect ion would be needed. Corr os io n work could mo st
T e s t s
SELECTION O F
THE
RESERVOIR
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 121/126
The se le c t ion of H eber o r Val les C alde ra fo r the s i te of the demon-
s t ra t ion p lan t
i s
base d on the ra t ing of approp r ia te cr i t er ia
as
s e t f o r t h
in Table 15, which su m m ar iz es the f indings developed dur ing the
cou rse of this study.
bi l i ty of re se rv oi r development and the socioeconomic imp act of
geo the rm al deve lopment in the Im per i a l Val ley. P ro con has m ade
a
pre l imi nary env i ronmenta l a ss ess m en t of Heber and Va l les Ca ld e ra
(with se i sm ic , subsidence and geological input by Geonomics). Holt in
this re po r t has developed the technical feas ib i l i ty of the convers ion
op tions and , wi th ass i s tanc e f ro m Proco n in cap i tal cos t e s t ima t ing ,
has ma de a n economic analys is of the conve rs ion opt ions of each s i te .
Geonomics has repor ted on the t echn ica l f eas i -
Table
15
s e t s f o r t h te n c r i t e r i a f o r r e s e r v o i r s e l e ct i o n a nd th e n r a t e s
each c r i t e r i a ( somewhat sub jec tive ly ) on
a
sc al e of 10 to
0.
r e s e r v o i r
r a t e s
ve ry we l l on al l c r i t e r i a
f o r
a n over a l l ra t ing of 92.
Va l le s C a l d e r a ' s o v e r a l l r a t in g
i s
63.
The Heber
One ma j o r p r o b l e m at Val les Ca lde ra
is
that t h e r e
i s
l i t t l e h a r d d a t a
avai lable on which to base a r e s e r v o i r e va lu at io n o r t o ma k e t e c h ni c a l
and econom ic evalu ations (rat i ng of 2). Cooling wa ter avai labi l i ty i s a
s e r i o u s c o n s t r a i n t
at
Val les Ca lde ra and ra te s a
2.
Val les Ca lde ra
d o e s not ma t c h th e r e p r e s e n t a t i v e r e s e r v o i r as we l l a s He b e r a n d
ra te s 4 in th i s ca tegory . Well p roduct iv ity i s low and we l l cos t
i s
CRITERIA
R e s e r vo i r s hou ld s uppor t 200 MWe fo r 30 ye a rs .
T AB L E 15
CRITERIA FOR RESERVOIR SELECTION
HE B E R
COMMENTS RATING
R e s e r v o i r m o r e t h a n a d e qu a t e .
VALLES CALDERA
C OM M E NT S
R e s e rv o i r p roba b ly mor e tha n a de qua te .
R AT ING
10
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 122/126
R e l l a b l e d at a s h o u l d b e a v a ~ l a b l e o define s ize
a n d c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of r e s e r v o i r .
R e s e r v o i r c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , s h o u l d b e c l o s e t o
r e p r e s e n t at i v e r e s e r v o i r .
We l l s s hou ld be p roduc t ive , a nd s uc c e s s fu l
re in je c t ion s hou ld ha ve be e n p ra c t i c e d .
B r ine s hou ld be nonc or ros ive a nd nons ca l lng ,
o r
well demons tra t ed metho ds of combatt i ng both
should be available
T he r e s hou ld be a de ma nd fo r e l e c t r i c power
wi th in a re a s ona b le d i s t a nc e .
The co s t of power should be compet i t ive with
a l t e rna te s ou rc e s o f ne w powe r
T he re s hou ld be a n a s s u r e d s upp ly o f c oo l lng
wa te r a va i l a b le .
T he r e s hou ld be no overriding environmental
c ons t ra in t s .
T he re s hou ld be no ove r r id ing s oc ioe c onon~ ic
c ons t ra in t s .
G oo d da t a a r e a v a ~ l a b l e .
He be r i s good ma tc h . I t i s l ow
s a l in i ty 15 ,000 ppm) a nd me d iu m
t e m p e r a t u r e 1 8 2 C 360 F .
He be r i s OK on bo th c oun t s .
Good da ta a va i l a b le on bo th c oun t s .
B r ine i s re l a t ive ly be n lgn
50 MWe can supply loc al needs .
F u l l f i e l d d e v e l o p m en t r e q u l r e s
ne w t ra ns mis s i on l ine to Sa n
Diego.
A p p e a r s t o b e competitive.
O K o n s h o r t t e r m . P r o b l e m s ,
p roba b ly s u rmoun ta b le , on long
t e r m .
M i n i ma l p r ob l e m s a s s o c i a te d w ~ t h
a l r qua l i ty , wa te r qua l i ty ,
s u b s i d e n ce a n d s e i s m i c e f f e c t s .
M i n i m a l i m p a c t a f t e r c o n s tr u c t io n .
W i ll i n c r e a s e e m p l o y m e n t a n d
Improve t a x ba s e .
Ve ry l i t t l e da ta a va i l a b le .
Va l l e s C a lde ra I S fa l r match. It 1s low
s a l lmty 5, 000 ppm) bu t fa i r ly h igh
te mpe ra tu r e 260 C 500
F .
We l l p roduc t iv i ty p roba b ly low; re in je c t io n
ha s be e n c a r r i e d ou t bu t no da ta a va il a b le .
No ha r d da ta a va i l a b le . I f c o r ro s ion a nd
s c a l e a r e p r o b l e m s , m e t h o d s a r e a v a i l ab l e
to c omba t the m.
N e w M e x ~ c o u b l i c S e r v i c e c a n t a k e o u t pu t ,
b u t n e e d i s l e s s t h a n a t H e b e r .
No t qu i t e s o c ompe t i t ive .
Proba b ly no t a va i l a b le e xc e p t a t h igh c os t .
M i n i m a l p r o b l e m s e x c e p t f o r p o w e r
c o r r i d o r s .
M in lma l impa c t a f t e r c ons t ruc t ion wi l l
i n c r e a s e e m p l o y m e n t a n d I m p r o v e t a x
ba s e .
2
8
TOTALS
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 123/126
RE COMMENDATION
On the s tre ng th of this study, the Heber geo therm al field in Californ ia
i s recommended a s the bes t s i te
f o r
a low-salinity hy drotherm al
dem onstrat ion plant .
If
a dem onstration plant is' con struc ted, the
power co nversion sy stem should be based on the binary cy cle, and the
capacity of the plant should be in the 50 MWe range.
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 124/126
A P P E N D I X
TEMPER TURE ENTH LPY DI GR M
TWO PH SE ENVELOPES OF TY PI C L BIN RY CYCLE F LU ID S
PROP NE ISOBUT NE
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 125/126
TEMPERATURE ENTHALPY DIA GRAM
TWO P H A SE E N V E LO P ES O F T Y P I C A L B I N A R Y C Y C L E F L U I D S
ISOBUTANE ISOPENTANE
7/25/2019 Geothermal convertion and economic
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/geothermal-convertion-and-economic 126/126
- . . . .
.
\ / 80 IS O B UTA NE 2 0 IS O P E NTA NE / 41.