gerard martin mass dep - amazon s3s3.amazonaws.com/.../10-11-11/10-11-11_gerard_martin.pdf2011/10/11...

14
Regulatory and Legal Issues Pertaining to Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Gerard Martin MASS DEP

Upload: others

Post on 30-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Gerard Martin MASS DEP - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/.../10-11-11/10-11-11_Gerard_Martin.pdf2011/10/11  · Gerard Martin MASS DEP 2 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Update Environmental Business

Regulatory and Legal Issues Pertaining to

Vapor Intrusion Mitigation

Gerard Martin

MASS DEP

Page 2: Gerard Martin MASS DEP - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/.../10-11-11/10-11-11_Gerard_Martin.pdf2011/10/11  · Gerard Martin MASS DEP 2 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Update Environmental Business

2

Vapor Intrusion Guidance Update

Environmental Business Council

Site Remediation & Redevelopment Program

Sub-slab Mitigation Systems for Vapor Intrusion

Gerard Martin, MassDEP BWSC

October 11, 2011

http://indoorairproject.wordpress.com/

Page 3: Gerard Martin MASS DEP - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/.../10-11-11/10-11-11_Gerard_Martin.pdf2011/10/11  · Gerard Martin MASS DEP 2 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Update Environmental Business

MassDEP is seeking to

provide guidance that: • Is health protective of current and future

occupants

• Gives current and future property owners and/or

developers a clear understanding of site

conditions where there is a potential for vapor

intrusion, and

• Is practical, can be applied consistently and

provide certainty in terms of expectations for

MCP compliance

3

Page 4: Gerard Martin MASS DEP - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/.../10-11-11/10-11-11_Gerard_Martin.pdf2011/10/11  · Gerard Martin MASS DEP 2 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Update Environmental Business

Section 3 - Mitigation

• VOC Source Elimination or Control

• Indoor Air Pathway Mitigation

• Active Mitigation Systems

• Alternative Mitigation Approaches

• Mitigation Maintenance and Monitoring

• Closure Sampling

Page 5: Gerard Martin MASS DEP - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/.../10-11-11/10-11-11_Gerard_Martin.pdf2011/10/11  · Gerard Martin MASS DEP 2 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Update Environmental Business
Page 6: Gerard Martin MASS DEP - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/.../10-11-11/10-11-11_Gerard_Martin.pdf2011/10/11  · Gerard Martin MASS DEP 2 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Update Environmental Business

Active Systems

Recommended Use

Active systems, specifically sub-slab

depressurization systems, are the

recommended method to address the

vapor intrusion pathway particularly if an

Imminent Hazard or Significant Risk

exists

Page 7: Gerard Martin MASS DEP - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/.../10-11-11/10-11-11_Gerard_Martin.pdf2011/10/11  · Gerard Martin MASS DEP 2 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Update Environmental Business

Active System Monitoring

Sampling to Demonstrate Effectiveness

Once a pressure differential across the

floor is established, conduct at least one

round of indoor air sampling during the

heating season. If it is determined that

the system is effectively reducing the

indoor air contaminant concentrations,

the differential pressure can then be used

to monitor system effectiveness

Page 8: Gerard Martin MASS DEP - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/.../10-11-11/10-11-11_Gerard_Martin.pdf2011/10/11  · Gerard Martin MASS DEP 2 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Update Environmental Business

Active System Monitoring

Maintenance Monitoring

• If sub-slab pressure differential

equal/greater than it was when the indoor

air sampling indicated that the indoor air

concentrations were at/below TVs, then

system is assumed to be working properly

• Annual checks for pressure drops and fan

operation should be conducted until site

closure

Page 9: Gerard Martin MASS DEP - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/.../10-11-11/10-11-11_Gerard_Martin.pdf2011/10/11  · Gerard Martin MASS DEP 2 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Update Environmental Business

Passive Venting Systems

Recommended Use

• Passive venting systems may be an

alternative to active SSD systems when

the subsurface contaminant concentrations

are low. Passive venting systems are not

recommended for Imminent Hazards or

Significant Risk

Page 10: Gerard Martin MASS DEP - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/.../10-11-11/10-11-11_Gerard_Martin.pdf2011/10/11  · Gerard Martin MASS DEP 2 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Update Environmental Business

Passive Venting Monitoring Sampling to Demonstrate Effectiveness

Low Concentrations:

Conduct at least two rounds of sampling in the first

year after the measures are implemented, with one

round conducted during heating season

High Concentrations:

Quarterly indoor air sampling in the first year after

the measures are implemented

Page 11: Gerard Martin MASS DEP - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/.../10-11-11/10-11-11_Gerard_Martin.pdf2011/10/11  · Gerard Martin MASS DEP 2 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Update Environmental Business

Passive Venting Monitoring Maintenance Monitoring

Low Concentrations:

Indoor air samples should be collected once

every two years during the heating season until

site closure

High Concentrations:

Indoor air samples should be collected annually

during the heating season until site closure

Page 12: Gerard Martin MASS DEP - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/.../10-11-11/10-11-11_Gerard_Martin.pdf2011/10/11  · Gerard Martin MASS DEP 2 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Update Environmental Business

Future Buildings

• Design and siting

• Tiered engineering solutions depending

on contaminant levels

– Vapor barrier with certified installation, +/- sub-

slab system, +/- monitoring

/

12

Page 13: Gerard Martin MASS DEP - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/.../10-11-11/10-11-11_Gerard_Martin.pdf2011/10/11  · Gerard Martin MASS DEP 2 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Update Environmental Business

A CB

gw < GW-2 gw < 10 x GW-2 gw > 10 x GW-2

“Low”

ia sampledia

Not

sampled

Not

sampledia

Protecting Occupants of Future Buildings: Examples of Possible Off-Ramps

MCP Closure: MCP Closure:(assumes all other require-

ments are met)• A-2 or B-1 RAO

• No AUL

• (assumes all other

requirements are

met)

• A-3 or B-2 RAO

(includes AUL)

•A-2 or B-1

(with potential future

notification obligation)

• RAO VI(possible future

option?)

Tim

e

Tim

e

Tim

e

“Elevated” “High”

Building Construction

• Unrestricted Use

• No MCP requirements

(assumes unchanged gw conditions) (assumes unchanged gw conditions)

Vapor Barrier & SSDSVapor Barrier & SSDS

Building Construction

• AUL Applies

• post-RAO RAM

with submittals

Building Construction

• AUL Applies

• post-RAO RAM

with submittals

• VB & SSDS

installed meeting

Performance Stnds

(TBD)

Documentation• VB & SSDS

installed meeting

Performance Stnds

(TBD)

• 2 yrs indoor air

sampling results

(consistent with existing

bldg requirements)

Documentation

MCP Closure:(assumes all other require-

ments are met)

• A-3 or B-2 RAO

(includes AUL)

•A-2 or B-1

(with potential future

notification

obligation)

•RAO VI(possible future

option?)

Page 14: Gerard Martin MASS DEP - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/.../10-11-11/10-11-11_Gerard_Martin.pdf2011/10/11  · Gerard Martin MASS DEP 2 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Update Environmental Business

14

Contact Information:

[email protected]

508 946-2799

http://indoorairproject.wordpress.com/