gerard w. ostheimer lecture what’s new in obstetric ... · ©2015 mfmer | slide-1 gerard w....
TRANSCRIPT
©2015 MFMER | slide-1
Gerard W. Ostheimer LectureWhat’s New in Obstetric Anesthesiology, 2014
Katherine W. Arendt, M.D.Associate Professor of AnesthesiologyMayo ClinicRochester, Minnesota
Obstetric Anaesthetists’ AssociationNovember 2, 2015
©2015 MFMER | slide-2
Ostheimer Lecture: Fast and Dense
©2015 MFMER | slide-3
Subject #
Reference
Reference
Reference
©2015 MFMER | slide-4
Overview
1. Labor
2. Cesarean Delivery
3. Morbidity & Mortality
©2015 MFMER | slide-5
Overview
1. Labor:
Labor pain and psychiatry
Labor epidurals & 2nd stage of labor
Epidurals and perineal injury
Pharmacology of labor analgesia
©2015 MFMER | slide-6
Do epidurals prevent postpartum depression?Prospective, non-randomized at Chinese hospital
• N = 214• 107 requested/received epidural • 107 NO labor analgesia
• 3 day & 6 wk Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale• Epidural = Less likely depressed
• OR 0.31, 95% CI, 0.12 - 0.82
Ding T, et al. Anesth Analg 2014; 119: 383
8Labor Pain
©2015 MFMER | slide-7
https://www.yahoo.com/health/epidural-during-childbirth-can-cut-postpartum-92645729712.html
©2015 MFMER | slide-8
Labor Epidurals & 2nd Stage of Labor
Does epidural analgesia lead to longer 2nd stage?
Do more epidurals more operative deliveries?
Do epidurals prevent perineal injury?
©2015 MFMER | slide-9
Second Stage of LaborDo epidurals lead to longer second stage?
42,268 vaginal deliveries, UCSF, 1976 - 2008
95th percentile, Length of Second Stage
Cheng YW, et al. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 527
11
2nd stagelength Difference P value
NulliparousNo epidural 197 min
2 Hours P < 0.001Epidural 336 min
MultiparousNo epidural 81 min
3 Hours P < 0.001Epidural 225 min
©2015 MFMER | slide-10
http://www.acog.org/About_ACOG/News_Room/News_Releases/2014
“Evidence now shows that labor actually progresses slower than we thought in the past, so many women might just need a little more time to labor and deliver vaginally instead of moving to a cesarean delivery…”
©2015 MFMER | slide-11
Does ↑ epidural use ↑ operative vaginal delivery?
Perinatal Registry of the Netherlands, 2000-2009
“Epidural analgesia is not an important causal factor of operative deliveries.”
Wassen MM et al. Europ J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;183:125-31
12Second Stage of Labor
EpiduralUse
InstrumentedVag. Del.
CesareanDelivery
NulliparousN = 616,063 ↑ 284% ↓ 3.3% ↑ 2.8%
MultiparousN = 762,395 ↑ 283% ↓ 0.7% ↑ 0.8%
©2015 MFMER | slide-12
Do epidurals cause or prevent perineal injury?61,308 Vaginal deliveries, Israeli hospital, 2006-2011
• 31,631 (51.6%) epidural• Univariate analysis: OR 1.78 (95% CI, 1.34 - 2.36)
Epidurals associated with perineal injury
• Multivariate analysis: OR 0.95 (95% CI, 0.69 - 1.29)Epidurals NOT associated with perineal injury
Multivariate analysis: Instr. VD & prolonged 2nd stage Perineal injury
Loewenberg-Weisband Y et al. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:1864-9.
13Epidurals & Perineal Injury
©2015 MFMER | slide-13
Do epidurals cause or prevent perineal injury?• Danish Medical Birth Registry 2000 – 2010
• Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries = OASIS• 214,256 primiparous vaginal deliveries
Jango H, Langhoff-Roos J. et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014. 210: 59 e1-6.
14Epidurals & Perineal Injury
Analysis Variables OREpidural 95% CI P value
Univariate None 1.12 1.01-1.17 < 0.0001
Multivariate Birth weight, vacuum 0.94 0.9-0.98 0.0028
Full Multivariate
Age, BMI, head circ., gest. age, episiotomy, IOL, oxytocin,
shoulder..0.84 0.81-0.88 <0.0001
Epidurals prevent perineal injury.
©2015 MFMER | slide-14
Pharmacology of Labor Analgesia
Intrathecal local anesthetics + opioids = synergism?
Are FHR changes greater after CSE?
©2015 MFMER | slide-15
Labor Analgesia
Ngan Kee WD, et al. Anesthesiology 2014; 120: 1126
17
Fentanyl
Intrathecal local anesthetics + opioids = synergism? 300 nullip’s, fentanyl and/or bupivacaine CSE
• Randomized to 1 of 30 combinations:
DoseCalculated: VAS ↓ at 15 min & 30 minLesser pain than predicted by additivity = Synergy
• 15 min (p<0.001) & 30 min (p=0.015)
Bupivacaine
©2015 MFMER | slide-16
Are FHR changes greater after CSE?115 Laboring women randomized to:
• CSE: Bup 2.5mg + fentanyl 5mcg • Epidural: Bup 0.1% + fentanyl 2mcg/mL, 20mL
No differences in FHR abnormalities.
Both groups: ↑ in FHR abnormalities after analgesia (p<0.0001)
Patel NP, El-Wahob N, Fernando R, et al. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 458
20Labor Analgesia
©2015 MFMER | slide-17
Remifentanil Labor Analgesia
Is remifentanil IV PCA inferior to epidural?Systematic review of 5 RCTs (n=886)
• Lower VAS pain scores with epidurals• No differences in secondary outcomes
• Remifentanil provides worse analgesia as labor progresses
Remifentanil IV PCA is inferior labor analgesia.
Liu ZQ, et al. Anesth Analg 2014; 118: 598
34,31
Stocki D, et al. Anesth Analg 2014; 118: 589
©2015 MFMER | slide-18
Overview
1. Labor
2. Cesarean Delivery
3. Morbidity & Mortality
©2015 MFMER | slide-19
Cesarean DeliveryPreventing Spinal Hypotension
Anesthetic & Analgesic Requirements
Intraoperative Awareness
Postcesarean Analgesia
General anesthesia and the fetal brain
©2015 MFMER | slide-20
Cesarean Delivery
Is the fluid bolus harmful?
N=30, prior to elective Cesarean• Administered 750mL warm LR bolus
• Endothelial glycocalyx biomarkers• Heparan sulfate • Syndecan-1
Levels of biomarkers increased after bolus
Fluid bolus disrupts glycocalyx
Powell M, et al. IJOA 2014; 23: 330-4
55
©2015 MFMER | slide-21
Prophylactic Phenylephrine InfusionHow well does it prevent spinal hypotension?
Systematic review of CD under spinal bupivacaine• 21 RCTs, n = 1504• Primary outcome: SBP < 80% baseline
Heesen M, et al. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 143
58
ComparisonInfusion
Phenylephrine’s Relative Risk for
HypotensionP value
Placebo 0.36 0.004
Ephedrine 0.58 0.009
Phenylephrine +Ephedrine 0.73 0.02
©2015 MFMER | slide-22
Which is better: Prophylactic infusion or rescue bolus?N=80, RCT, primary outcome: # rescue phenylephrine boluses
• Infusion group: 0.75mcg/kg/min + bolused phenylephrine prn• Bolus group: Phenylephrine 100mcg bolus prn
Siddik-Sayyid S, et al. Anesth Analg 2014; 118: 611
59Phenylephrine
Outcome Phenyl.Bolus
Phenyl.Infusion Difference
Median # of Rescue Boluses 3 0 MD 3
95% CI, 2-4Hypotension 90% (35/39) 20% (8/40) p<0.001
Nausea/Vomiting 44% (17/39) 10% (4/40) p=0.001
Hypertension 0% (0/30) 15% (6/40) p=0.26
“One shoe will never fit all… [because practices, patients, clinical scenarios and providers are all different]… anesthesia providers should be able to develop a phenylephrine regimen based on
their local experience that provides an acceptable balance between the elimination of
maternal symptoms and the risks of hypertension and bradycardia.” – Warwick Ngan Kee
©2015 MFMER | slide-23
Progesterone & Cesarean Delivery
Progesterone decreases anesthesia & analgesia requirements?
Elective Cesarean, > 36 weeks gestation, n=90• All General Anesthesia
• Induction: thiopental, rocuronium• Maintenance: sevoflurane/nitrous titrated to HR & BIS
[Sevoflurane] : [serum progesterone] = Negative correlation• r = -0.26 (95% CI -0.44 to -.0.05, p=0.01)
Postop analgesia : [serum progesterone] = Negative correlation• 2 hours (r = -0.20, p = 0.05)• 24 hours (r = -0.25, p = 0.02)• 48 hours (r = -0.28, p = 0.01)
Lee J, Ko S. Anesthesia and analgesia 2014; 119: 901
40
Greater progesterone
Lesser anesthesia & analgesia requirements
©2015 MFMER | slide-24
Obstetric Intraoperative Awareness
• 5th National Audit Project (NAP5)
• Prospective study:• 269 study coordinators in 329 UK hospitals • 41 coordinators in 46 Irish hospitals
• Reported accidental awareness under GA at their hospitals• Reports reviewed by NAP5 panel
• Denominator: 2,800,000 general anesthetics in UK & Ireland
©2015 MFMER | slide-25
Incidence of awareness: 1 in 19,000 anestheticsObstetrics: The most over-represented surgical speciality
• 12 cases out of 8000 CDs under GA• Incidence : 1 in 670 CD under GA (95% CI, 380 – 1,300)
Risk factors identified elsewhere in NAP5:• RSI• Omission of opioids at induction• Difficult airway management• Obesity• Brief period between induction & incision• High incidence of emergent surgery• High rates of off-hours surgery (higher rates of non-consultant care)
Pandit JJ et al. British journal of anaesthesia 2014; 113: 549-59
48Obstetric Intraoperative Awareness
©2015 MFMER | slide-26
Could Bispectril Index monitoring prevent awareness? N= 61, Isolated Forearm Technique + BIS Monitor
• Thiopental 4-5mg/kg & Succinylcholine 1-2mg/kg• 50% nitrous & 1.8-2.2% sevoflurane
Positive IFT:• 41% Laryngoscopy• 46% Intubation• 23% Skin Incision
BIS could not differentiate positive vs negative testsNo patients experienced recall
Zand F, et al. Brit J Anaesth 2014; 112: 871
49Obstetric Intraoperative Awareness
©2015 MFMER | slide-27
Pain After Cesarean Delivery
What’s the incidence of chronic pain after Cesarean?• Prospective observational, N = 300
• 6 months = 3%• 12 months = 0.6%
• Acute postoperative pain chronic pain
Are TAP blocks safe after Cesarean?• TAP blocks add no benefit to intrathecal morphine• TAP blocks after Cesarean: high risk of seizure?
McKeen DM, et al. Can J Anaesth 2014; 61: 631-40Chandon M, et al. PloS one 2014; 9:e103971Weiss E, et al. RAPM 2014; 39:248-51
64,67-71
Ortner CM, et al. RAPM 2014; 39: 478-86
©2015 MFMER | slide-28
General Anesthesia and the Fetal and Neonatal Brain
Nonhuman primate brain: • Isoflurane’s apoptosis from 3rd trimester - neonate
Sevoflurane + hydrogen = neuronal apoptosis • Fetal mouse brain
Isoflurane + carbon monoxide = neuronal apoptosis• Neonatal mouse brain
Ketamine + dexmedetomidine = neuronal apoptosis • 2 month-old rat brain
Takaenoki Y, et al. Anesthesiology 2014; 120: 403-415Cheng Y, Levy RJ. Anesth Analg 2014; 118:1284-92Duan x, et al. Acta Anaesth Scand 2014; 58:1121-6
175-9
Creeley CE et al. Anesthesiology 2014; 120: 626-38
©2015 MFMER | slide-29
Overview
1. Labor
2. Cesarean Delivery
3. Morbidity & Mortality
©2015 MFMER | slide-30
Obstetric Morbidity and MortalityThe SCORE projectCardiac arrestPostpartum hemorrhage Sepsis Maternal early warning systemsWorldwide maternal mortality
©2015 MFMER | slide-31
SCORE project
What’s the incidence of OB anesthesia complications?
The Serious Complication Repository Project for Obstetric Anesthesia
• 30 U.S. institutions, 5 years• 257,000 obstetric anesthetics
• 157 total serious complications • 1:1,959 (95% CI 1,675-2,294)
• 85 anesthesia-related complications• 1:3,021 (95% CI 2,443 - 3,782)
D'Angelo R, Smiley RM, Riley ET, Segal S. Anesthesiology 2014;120:1505-12
95
©2015 MFMER | slide-32
SCORE project
Maternal death 1: 10,250Cardiac arrest 1: 7,151Serious neurologic injury 1: 11,389Respiratory arrest in LR 1: 8,455Failed intubation 1: 533High neuraxial block 1: 4,336Unrecognized spinal catheter 1: 15,435
D'Angelo R, Smiley RM, Riley ET, Segal S. Anesthesiology 2014;120:1505-12
95
©2015 MFMER | slide-33
Cardiac ArrestIncidence and causes of maternal cardiac arrest?
National Inpatient Sample (U.S.): • 56,900,512 deliveries, 1998-2011• 4,843 cardiac arrests
• 8.5 per 100,000 1 in 12,000 Survived to Discharge (59%)
Mhyre JM, Tsen LC, et al. Anesthesiology 2014; 120: 810-8
107
Lowest survival Highest survivalAortic dissection 0% Anaphylaxis 100%Trauma 23% Mag toxicity 86%
Aspiration 83%Anes. complications 82%
©2015 MFMER | slide-34
Cardiac ArrestPostpartum hemorrhage 28%Antepartum hemorrhage 17%Heart failure 13%Amniotic fluid embolism 13%Sepsis 11%Anesthesia complications 8%Aspiration pneumonitis 7%Venous thromboembolism 7%Eclampsia 6%
Mhyre JM, Tsen LC, et al. Anesthesiology 2014; 120: 810-8
107
©2015 MFMER | slide-35
Cardiac ArrestMedical condition adjusted OR
Pulmonary hypertension 13.3Malignancy 12.5Ischemic heart disease 7.6Liver disease 5.5Congenital heart disease 4.2 Systemic lupus 4.1Cardiac valvular disease 3.8
Mhyre JM, Tsen LC, et al. Anesthesiology 2014; 120: 810-8
107
©2015 MFMER | slide-36
Cardiac ArrestThe society for obstetric anesthesia and perinatology consensus statement on the management of cardiac
arrest in pregnancyCommissioned by Board of Directors of SOAP • Highlights:
• Educational strategies• Communication strategies• Periodic systems testing• Point of care checklists
Manual left uterine displacement
Lipman S, Cohen S, Einav S et al. Anesth Analg 2014; 118: 1003-16
107
©2015 MFMER | slide-37
Maternal Mortality in the US Can bundled practice changes prevent maternal mortality?
Hospital Corporation of America• 2000-2006, baseline maternal mortality
• Intervened with 3 protocols• 2007-2012: 81 deaths / 1,256,020 deliveries (1 in 15,600)
• 3 protocols :• Universal SCDs during & after Cesarean• HTN crisis & pulmonary edema• PPH protocol
Clark SL, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 32e1-9
117
significant p =0.038 significant p =0.02
trend toward in deaths, p= 0.07
©2015 MFMER | slide-38
PPH RecognitionIs there a tool to facilitate PPH recognition?
Obstetric Shock Index = HR ÷ SBPN=100, both CD and VDMassive PPH (>30% loss of blood volume) vs controls
10 minutes after onset of bleeding
30 minutes after onset of bleeding
Le Bas A, et al. Int J gynecol obstet 2014: 124: 253-5
147
OSI SDControl 0.74 +/- 0.30
PPH 0.91 +/- 0.42
OSI SDControl 0.76 +/- 0.27
PPH 0.90 +/- 0.33
Obstetric shock index > 1 , think PPH
©2015 MFMER | slide-39
PPH Prevention
Prophylactic tranexamic acid?
Systematic review, 7 trials (n=1760)
• Bld tx after tranexamic acid: • RR 0.34 (95% CI 0.20-0.60)
• Eliminate 2 trials with tx rates: • RR 0.35 (95% CI 0.12-1.04)
139
Heesen M, et al. Acta anaesth Scand 2014; 58: 1075-85
©2015 MFMER | slide-40
PPH TreatmentCan we conserve blood in stable, anemic postpartum pts?RCT, Non-blinded, Non-inferiority (n = 521)
• 12-24 hrs after PPH, Hgb 4.8-7.9 g/dL, stableRandomized to:
• Intervention arm: transfuse 8.9 g/dL• Non intervention arm: transfuse only if severe symptoms
Primary outcome, physical fatigue at 3 days
Intervention group: 2 units pRBC (IQ 2-2) Hgb 9.0 (8.5-9.5)Non-intervention grp: 0 units pRBC (IQ 0-0) Hgb 7.4 (6.8-7.7)
Non-inferiority not demonstrated • Very small difference in fatigue • No difference in secondary outcomes:
• Breastfeeding, infection, thrombosis
140
Prick BW, et al. BJOG 2014; 121: 1005
©2015 MFMER | slide-41
Maternal Mortality in the UK
2009-2012 Triennial report:• 10.12 deaths per 100,000 maternities
• Compared to 2006-2008: 11 per 100,000• 2/3 died from indirect causes• 3/4 women who died had co-existing medical conditions
• Emphasis: • Management of preexisting medical conditions • Provision of critical care support• Think sepsis
Knight M, et al. UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2009–12, University of Oxford 2014
118
©2015 MFMER | slide-42
SepsisWhat’s the cause of peripartum sepsis?UK OB Surveillance System
• 2011-2012, 780,537 maternities, 365 severe sepsis• Severe sepsis 4.7 per 10,000 maternities
• 20% (n = 71) Septic Shock• 1.4% (n = 5) Died
AntepartumE. coli n=33 24.6% Group B Strep n=13 9.7%
Postpartum E.coli n=44, 19.1%Group A strep n=30, 13.0%Staph n=21, 9.1%Group B strep n=17, 7.4%
Acosta CD, et al. Plos Medicine 2014: 11: e1001672
131
50% SIRS to septic shock < 2 hrs75% SIRS to septic shock < 9 hrs
©2015 MFMER | slide-43
Maternal early warning systems
• 2012 Surveys to all lead OB Anaesthetists:• 130/205 responded (63%)• 130/130 used MEOWS (100%)
• “Maternal Early Warning Criteria”
Mhyre JM, et al. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124: 782
119-20
Isaacs RA, et al. Anaesth 2014; 69: 687
Vital Sign Min MaxHeart rate 50 120SBP 90 160DBP -- 100Resp Rate 10 3002 Sat on RA 95% --UOP, 2 hrs 35mL/hr --
SymptomsAgitation
Confusion
Unresponsiveness
Shortness of breath
Non-remittingheadache
©2015 MFMER | slide-44
World Wide Maternal Mortality
• WHO Millennium Development Goal:• Decrease maternal mortality by ¾ by 2015
• Themes:• Near-miss & maternal death reviews• Evidence-based guideline adherence• Postpartum hemorrhage reduction & treatment• Preventing abortion and especially unsafe abortion
• In 2014 there were:• 289,000 maternal mortalities • 2.6 million stillborn babies • 3.0 million babies dying within one month of birth
Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 121 Supplement #4Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014; 126 Supplement #1Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014; 127 Supplement #1
124-6
©2015 MFMER | slide-45
Thank You
Hans Sviggum, M.D. Rebecca Johnson, M.D.
Nuala Lucas and Roshan Fernando
©2015 MFMER | slide-46
Thank You