get on the analyzer “fast track” - agilent · get on the analyzer “fast track” pesticide...
TRANSCRIPT
Get on the Analyzer “FAST TRACK”
Pesticide and Environmental Pollutant GC/MS/MS Multi-residue Analyzer 2.0
… Identify Analytes in Complex Matrices … Obtain Analytical Results on DAY ONE!
ASTS 2012
ASTS 2012
Representative Sample
Extraction
General Workflow: Screen Confirm and Quantify
Clean-up
QuEChERS
S C Q
C16 H19 N3 P Cl C15 H25 O P S Cl C18 H21 O P Cl
LC/QTOF or GC/QTOF – for unknown compounds
S
Exact Mass Database Search
Molecular Formula Generation
Q C Another injection for MS/MS (QQQ or QTOF) 3
1
LC/QQQ MRM – for known targets S
C
Q
3 1
GC/QQQ MRM – for known targets S
C
Q
3 1
GC/MS (PTV) SIM/Scan – for known and unknown Final Report
S
C
Q
Deconvolution
(+backflush)
2
1
QuEChERS Procedure
3/20/2012
2
*
Add homogenized sample to tube Add 2 ceramic homogenizers (see below)*
Add ACN, shake
Add extraction packet of salts
Shake, Shake, shake
Add Internal standards, shake
Centrifuge, partitioning and extraction
Transfer an aliquot to the d-SPE tube
Vortex
Centrifuge
Transfer aliquot to vial for analysis
1
2 3
4
3
5 3
6
8
7
9
10 11
The Agilent Analyzer Concept
ASTS 2012
Factory Configuration and Chemical Test with Agilent Specialist
On-site Application Set-up
CE Setup HW I&F
Customer Responsible
Aftermarket
Factory Checkout
Individual Components produced
Individual Components Tested (OFN)
System assembled
Appl. method developed on system
System checkout on appl. mix
Run 1st customer sample
Method optimization or customization
On-going maintenance & service support
Factory Setup & Checkout
Consulting or Field Services
Aftersales Support
CE Specialist Analyzer I&F
Hardware Only Sale
Analyzer Sale
Analyzer Added Value
4
Technical Features: Pesticide and Environmental Pollutant GC/MS/MS Analyzer 2.0
• Allow simple system-to-system method transfer and column replacement
Retention Time Locking
• Large-volume injection enhances trace-level detection Multimode Inlet (MMI)
• Improve uptime and shorten analysis times Capillary Flow
Technology (CFT) and Backflush
• Comprehensive and optimized MRM database for 1000+ compounds
Comprehensive MS/MS MRM Database
• Factory setup and check out on pesticide mixture Pre-config. and factory
setup / tested
New
ASTS 2012 5
RTL GC-MS (/MS) Analysis
ASTS 2012
Load method, single injection to re-lock RT on customer site, and acquisition method is set-up!
Trifluralin Expected RT = 5.8185 min
System at Agilent Lab
System at Customer Lab after re-lock
5.8177 min
5.8176 min
6
Why Use Backflush?
7
Increased Productivity:
• Selectivity of MS/MS eliminates “dirty matrix”
• LOD requirements necessitates users inject larger sample volumes
• Many late eluting peaks are not “chromatographically ideal” and leave a
residue throughout the column
• Heavy matrices contaminate the source faster – performance is LOST!
Backflush ensures the highest data quality with GC/MS/MS! The trade-off is 10-20% decrease in sensitivity.
ASTS 2012
Milk Extract Analysis
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Run stopped at 42 min and back flushed at 280oC for 7 min
It took additional 33 min and column to 320oC to remove these high boilers.
Blank run after back flushing
min
Column is clean.
Once set, backflush timing will work for ALL high boilers. - heaviest compounds elute first
8 ASTS 2012
Without Backflush: A Serious Problem
Overlay of two chromatograms of a blank extract injected BEFORE (A) and AFTER (B) three injections without back flush
Abundance
4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 0 2000000 4000000 6000000 8000000 1e+07
1.2e+07 1.4e+07 1.6e+07 1.8e+07 2e+07 2.2e+07 2.4e+07 2.6e+07 2.8e+07 3e+07 3.2e+07 3.4e+07 3.6e+07 3.8e+07 4e+07 4.2e+07 4.4e+07 4.6e+07
Time
A: TIC: lettuce_blank.D\data.ms
B: TIC: lettuce_blank3.D\data.ms
B
A
Data provided by user in Almeria, Spain
After 3 sample injections, background significantly higher with increased chemical noise in every spectrum
ASTS 2012 9
With Backflush: Less Spectral Noise (Background) and Consistent Retention Times
Stable retention times and baseline with reduced chemical noise
4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 0
2000000 4000000 6000000 8000000 1e+07
1.2e+07 1.4e+07 1.6e+07 1.8e+07 2e+07
2.2e+07 2.4e+07 2.6e+07 2.8e+07 3e+07
3.2e+07 3.4e+07 3.6e+07 3.8e+07 4e+07
4.2e+07 4.4e+07 4.6e+07
Time
Abundance
TIC: lettuce_10_ppb.D\data.ms TIC: lettuce_100_ppb.D\data.ms TIC: lettuce_5_ppb.D\data.ms
Overlay of three chromatograms of lettuce extract run with 2 min of back flush
Data provided by user in Almeria, Spain
ASTS 2012 10
But… How will this Analyzer work with
my list of target pesticides?
11 ASTS 2012
Agilent Provides the Most Comprehensive and Flexible MRM Database
12
1. Contains >8500 optimized MRMs for 1074 pesticides and environmental pollutants
2. Characteristics for each compound include CAS, MW, Molecular Formula, RT in CF and CP BF modes, etc. Relative intensity of each transition
3. Tools and macros for quick method customization Requires <5 Min. to build acquisition method Tutorial videos on database CD for education and training
ASTS 2012
Important!
Classes of Compounds in the Database
Compound Classification Total Number Pesticides (fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, rodenticides and others) 675 Breakdown Products 42 Deuterated Compounds 6 Polybrominated Diphenyl Ether (PBDE) 4 Polybrominated Biphenyl (PBB) 1 Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) 209 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) 26 Phthalates 17 Additional Semi-volatile Pollutants 94
13 ASTS 2012
Why Do You Need 8 Transitions for Each Compound? -- Top Two Transitions of Methamidophos (10 pg) in Three Matrices
small matrix interference
Spinach
strong matrix interference (overlapping peak gives
inaccurate quantitation result)
Pear Orange
medium matrix interference (overlapping peak gives
incorrect ion ratio)
141 -> 95
95 -> 79
Alternative Transitions Help Minimize Matrix Interferences and Improve Quantitation Result
14 ASTS 2012
Successful Use of Two Alternate Methamidophos Transitions to Minimize Matrix Interference
95 -> 64
141 -> 80
Pear Orange
minimum matrix interference minimum matrix interference
Recommendation: Evaluate chemical noise of an analyte’s multiple transitions in different matrices to select the most appropriate transitions in a particular matrix.
Database’s feature of 8 MRM transitions for each analyte makes this task easy!
15 ASTS 2012
16 ASTS 2012
Pesticides Analysis Case Studies
Case Study 1
Background: A major Chinese independent lab required a single injection GC/MS/MS method to analyze 323 pesticides in vegetables
Instrument Time for method
development Chemicals Required End Result
Other Vendor’s System 32 weeks of hard work 323 chemical
standards Poor results, not happy,
switched to Agilent
Agilent Pesticide 1.0 2 weeks, to add cmpds and adjust method
34 compounds not in 0501 Database Happy!
Agilent Pesticide 2.0 3 minutes
(NOT weeks, NOT days, NOT hours)
None Love it !!!
To build the database Agilent performed >3000 runs, so you don’t have to!
17 ASTS 2012
18 ASTS 2012
Case Study 2: Endosulfan Sulfate (?) in Organic Tea Extract
3.3 ppb, Equiv : 0.016 mg/Kg in Tea Tea EU MRL : Sum Endo a+b+sulfate = 30 mg/kg
Std 5 ppb Reagent Blank Organic Tea A
• Single Qualifier Transition • Ion Ratio outside 80-120%
confidence band • Unconfirmed
19 ASTS 2012
Case Study 2: Optimized MRM Transitions for Endosulfan Sulfate
• Alter method to include next highest transitions
• Rerun analysis
20 ASTS 2012
Endosulfan Sulfate () in Organic Tea Extract – Using 3 Qualifier Transitions
• Rerun of data • Ion Ratio within 80-120%
confidence band • CONFIRMED!!
Organic Tea A • Demonstrates the value of multiple optimized transitions in the MRM Database.
• Not just to avoid matrix interferences but also for additional confirmation!
Analyzer Benefits
21
1. Reduces end user investment for method development and start-up
2. Deployment of cutting edge Agilent technology such as RTL, CFT and MRM Database increases productivity
3. Ongoing support for hardware PLUS application performance
Agilent Analyzers offers laboratories the quickest return on their capital investment!
22
Thank you for your attention!