getting to the heart - charleston conf 2011

20
What Faculty Tell Us about How Our Collections Support Student Learning 2011 Charleston Conference Marcia Thomas Illinois Wesleyan University Getting to the Heart of the Matter:

Upload: mthomas123

Post on 01-Nov-2014

163 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

What Faculty Tell Us about How Our Collections Support Student

Learning

2011 Charleston Conference

Marcia ThomasIllinois Wesleyan University

Getting to the Heart of the Matter:

Page 2: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

2,100 students, 191 Faculty

Curriculum in liberal arts, fine arts, and professional programs

Schools: Nursing, Theater, Art, and Music

Liberal Arts: 25% business majors

Illinois Wesleyan University

Page 3: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

New building 2002

450,000 volume capacity

9 librarians

Collections Librarian and Information Literacy Librarian 2009

CARLI – statewide academic consortium

Ames Library

Page 4: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

“Tying information literacy to a library materials budget: repackaging the formula to meet learning goals.”

Jenny Rushing & Dawn Stephen, Belmont U. Charleston Conference 2009

“Changing the way libraries and faculty assess periodical collections in the electronic age.”

Jenica Rogers, SUNY Potsdam. Against the Grain Nov. 2006

INSPIRATIONS

Page 5: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

Ensure relevant and vital collections Ensure money used to purchase or provide

access to best possible resources for users and curriculum

Long term planning for collection management

Identify “core” resources for easy and continuous access, long-term maintenance or archiving

Faculty involvement critical to aligning collections with current curriculum

Challenge librarians’ assumptions

COLLECTION REVIEW

Page 6: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

Shift format from print to online Prioritize expenditures for budget

planning Identify candidates for weeding &

cancellation Identify “legacy” and core titles Revise collection development policy

COLLECTION TASKS

Page 7: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

Faculty interviews Record and document interviews Synthesize/analyze data from interviews

Report to departments and administration

METHODOLOGY

Page 8: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

Library Advisory Committee

Free lunch!

Ask the experts

TESTING, TESTING…

Page 9: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

http://www.erialproject.org

ERIAL Project: Ethnographic Research in Illinois Academic Libraries

Page 10: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

1. What are your fields and subfields of scholarship?

2. What professional associations do you belong to?3. Do you edit or review for any journals? If yes,

which?4. Which publishers are most important for your

field and subfields? Do you receive catalogs for these or other publishers?

5. What collections (physical or virtual) do you use that are outside of our own?

INTERVIEW QUESTIONS : Faculty interests and scholarship

Page 11: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

1. What courses do you teach regularly?

2. Which courses do you teach infrequently?

3. What courses do you have in development? Please include courses you teach in interdisciplinary programs.

INTERVIEW QUESTIONS: Teaching

Page 12: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

5. What are your overall pedagogical goals when developing assignments for your students?

6. Are our collections and resources relevant with respect to assignments?

7. Are there ways in which the library might support, or further support, your

goals and the work of your students?

INTERVIEW QUESTIONS: Teaching

Page 13: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

8. Are there any particular characteristics of those resources that are important for

teaching that course, or meeting the pedagogical goals of assignments and research projects?

9. Are there any particular characteristics that are important for teaching in your discipline

and interdisciplinary programs? 10. Are there resources we don’t have that we

ought to consider? Or areas of the collection that could be improved?

INTERVIEW QUESTIONS: Teaching

Page 14: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

What did I learn? Surprises? Confirmations?

What will I report back to the departments? 

How will this data inform impact my decision making about collections

and other liaison responsibilities, such as instruction? 

LIBRARIAN QUESTIONS

Page 15: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

RESPONSES = 87%

Page 16: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

Video Interlibrary Loan Format Information Literacy Faculty role in collection development Faculty awareness

PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS

Page 17: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

“I think the utility of the interviews worked both ways: the faculty were directed to reflect on the library in an engaged way, and I was directed to ask them questions that I had pre-supposed the answers to. Sometimes my suppositions were right, and sometimes they were only what I wanted to think.

For their part, I believe these discussions opened doors of communication that will allow future conversations to occur more easily. I think we planted the seeds of how the library can impact pedagogy and student research habits.”

Karen Schmidt, IWU University Librarian

WHAT LIBRARIANS SAID

Page 18: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

Follow up:Respond to requestsReport back

Phase II:  Revise collection development policy Revisit allocationWeeding Identify core resourcesSerials and database review

TO DO

Page 19: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011
Page 20: Getting to the Heart - Charleston Conf 2011

Rushing, Jenny, and Dawn Stephen. “Tying Information Literacy to a Library Materials Budget: Repackaging the Formula to Meet Learning Goals.” Belmont University. Charleston Conference 2009.

www.katina.info/conference/2009presentations/Sat1015_Rushing.ppt

Rogers, Jenica. "Changing the way Libraries and Faculty Assess Periodical Collections in the Electronic Age." Against the Grain 18.5 (2006): 38, 40, 42, 44.

Marcia Thomas email:

[email protected]