gfr-he/co2 analysis using relap5/athena documents/marshall.pdfathena model: gfr specifications •...
TRANSCRIPT
-
GFR-He/CO2 AnalysisUsing RELAP5/ATHENATheron D. Marshall, PhD
August 26, 2004
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 2
Outline of Presentation
• Gen-IV, Gas-cooled Fast Reactor concept– Looking beyond the Next Generation Nuclear
Plant• Impetus for Safety Analysis
– Is passive safety inherently safe?• The Large-Break LOCA
– One of the most severe GFR challenges• RELAP5/ATHENA Input Model• Modeling Predictions
– What the numbers imply• Conclusions
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 3
What is the Gen-IV GFR Reactor Concept?
• Has design specifications of:– being inherently safe– using direct Brayton
cycle energy conversion with the He option
– featuring high outlet temperatures, which increase thermal efficiency and suggest H2 production
Background
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 4
GFR – Looking beyond the NGNP
• Anticipated deployment: 2025• Neutron flux of 1 x 1014 n/cm2-s• Power density of 55 MW/m3 to 100 MW/m3
• Reference core configuration and fuel:– Plate/block, UC with SiC matrix
• Optional core configuration and fuel:– pin, U-Zr CERMET
• Reference core coolant:– He at 7 MPa [490 °C {in}, 842 °C {exit}]
• Optional core coolant:– CO2 at 20 MPa [400 °C {in}, 550 °C {exit}]
Background
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 5
GFR, NGNP – a difference in flow direction
NGNP with concentric inlet/outletand downward flow through core
GFR with concentric inlet/outletand upward flow through core
Background
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 6
Impetus for Safety Analysis
• Gen-IV reactor concepts have the directive of having enhanced safety systems
• Ideally the reactors will circumvent an accident scenario with minimal operator intervention
• The high power density of the GFR will effectively challenge any Decay Heat Removal System (DHRS)
• A passively-safe GFR DHRS may require innovative components and engineering design
• Safety analyses and experiments are necessary to validate any DHRS designs
Define Research Task
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 7
Challenge of the Large-Break LOCA
• A double guillotine break of the inlet and outlet legs• Decay Heat: 13% [SCRAM], 1.5% [1 hr], 1.2% [2 hr] of
600 MW• Gen-IV Objective:
– Complete decay heat removal with a passive DHRS
– DHRS should maintain temperature limits for a minimum time period of three days
• Maximum matrix temperature limit < 2000 °C
Define Research Task
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 8
ATHENA Model: GFR Specifications
• Coolants: He and S-CO2• Fuel: UC with SiC matrix• TiN radial reflector and BC neutron shield• Overview of system parameters:
600 MWth20 MPa400 ºC550 ºC
3260 kg/s8.35 m2
6.42 m2
GA-MHR
600 MWth7 MPa490 ºC850 ºC
330 kg/s8.35 m2
6.42 m2
GA-MHR
Power LevelCoolant PressureInlet TemperatureOutlet TemperatureMass Flow RateInlet Flow AreaOutlet Flow AreaReactor Cavity Cooling System (RCCS)
S-CO2HeSystem Parameter
Bound Research Task
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 9
ATHENA Model: GFR Core Cross Section
600 MWth50 MW/m3
1.251.7 m127
20 cm91
40 %
Thermal PowerAverage Power DensityAxial Power PeakingCore HeightFuel AssembliesWidth of Fuel AssemblyCoolant Holes/AssemblyCoolant Void Fraction
ValueCore Parameter
Bound Research Task
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 10
ATHENA Model: Unit Cell Heat Structure
Bound Research Task
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 11
ATHENA Model: Hydraulic Nodalization
Containment
Dow
ncom
er
Inlet Plenum
ShldShld Shld
Refl
Shld Shld
Refl Refl Refl Refl
Cor
e-1
Cor
e-2
Cor
e-3
Ref
lect
or
Shi
eld
Shld
Refl
Shld
Refl
Shld
Refl
Shld
Refl
Shld
Refl
Outlet Plenum
Head Plenum
RV Head
RV
Wal
l
Outlet
Inlet
Bound Research Task
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 12
ATHENA Model: Conduction Circuit
Neutron Shield
Reflector
Core
Core Support
Outlet Plenum
Inlet Plenum
1002
1003-01
1000-01
Reactor Head Dome
Reactor Vessel
Upper and Lower Head
1401-01
1401-02
1401-03
1401-04
1401-05
1401-06
1401-07
1401-08
1401-09
1401-10
1401-11
1401-12
1401-13
1401-14
1401-15
1401-16
Core Barrel
1001-01
1001-02
1001-03
1001-04
1001-05
1001-06
1001-07
1001-08
1001-09
1001-10
1001-11
1001-12
1001-13
1001-14
1001-15
1001-16
1001-17
Reactor Vessel
Cylindrical Wall
Bound Research Task
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 13
ATHENA Model: Core Nodalization
Core
5000-21
5000-22
5000-23
5000-24
5000-25
5000-16
5000-17
5000-18
5000-19
5000-20
5000-11
5000-12
5000-13
5000-14
5000-15
5000-06
5000-07
5000-08
5000-09
5000-10
5000-01
5000-02
5000-03
5000-04
5000-05
5002-21
5002-22
5002-23
5002-24
5002-25
5002-16
5002-17
5002-18
5002-19
5002-20
5002-11
5002-12
5002-13
5002-14
5002-15
5002-06
5002-07
5002-08
5002-09
5002-10
5002-01
5002-02
5002-03
5002-04
5002-05
5004-21
5004-22
5004-23
5004-24
5004-25
5004-16
5004-17
5004-18
5004-19
5004-20
5004-11
5004-12
5004-13
5004-14
5004-15
5004-06
5004-07
5004-08
5004-09
5004-10
5004-01
5004-02
5004-03
5004-04
5004-05
Reflect
6000-01
6000-02
4000-01
4000-02
6002-01
6002-02
4002-01
4002-02
6004-01
6004-02
4004-01
4004-02
6006-01
6006-02
5006-09
5006-10
5006-07
5006-08
5006-05
5006-06
5006-03
5006-04
5006-01
5006-02
4006-01
4006-02
Shield
7000-01
7000-02
3000-01
3000-02
7002-01
7002-02
3002-01
3002-02
7004-01
7004-02
3004-01
3004-02
7006-01
7006-02
3006-01
3006-02
7008-01
7008-02
6008-01
6008-02
5008-09
5008-10
5008-07
5008-08
5008-05
5008-06
5008-03
5008-04
5008-01
5008-02
4008-01
4008-02
3008-01
3008-02
Core Support
2010-05
2000-01
2000-02
2002-01
2002-02
2004-01
2004-02
2006-01
2006-02
2008-01
2008-02
2010-01
2010-02
2010-03
2010-04
Core Barrel
1401-01
1401-02
1401-03
1401-04
1401-05
1401-06
1401-07
1401-08
1401-09
1401-10
1401-11
1401-12
1401-13
1401-14
1401-15
1401-16
1401-17
1401-18
1401-19
1401-20
1401-21
1401-22
1401-23
1401-24
1401-25
1401-26
1401-27
Bound Research Task
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 14
ATHENA Model: Radiation Circuit
Bound Research Task
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 15
ATHENA Model: Core, Containment, RCCS
Bound Research Task
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 16
ATHENA Model: Input Deck Specifics
• Heat Structures: 134• Mesh Points: 725• Hydrodynamic Volumes: 144• Volume:
– Coolant (He/CO2): 6,608 m3
– RCCS (air): 816 m3
• Mass:– He Coolant: 9,348 kg– CO2 Coolant: 44,402 kg– RCCS 947 kg
Bound Research Task
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 17
ATHENA Model: Boundary Conditions
• Specified:– coolant inlet temperature [490°C, He] [400°C, CO2]– coolant outlet temperature [842°C, He] [550°C, CO2]
• Calculated:– coolant flow rate calculated during steady state to
provide desired outlet plenum temperature• Assumed:
– SCRAM curve of PWR– No gamma/neutron heating in reflector/shield– Containment pressure maintained [~0.8 MPa, He]
[~1.8 MPa, CO2]– RCCS is the DHRS (baseline case)
Bound Research Task
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 18
• Steady-State Analysis– determined by constant containment temperature– volumetric heat capacity decreased by factor of 100– problem time of 4,200 s
Overview of ATHENA Steady-State Analysis
Perform Research Task
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 19
• LB-LOCA Transient– problem time reset to
0 s– valves open coolant
loop to containment at 10 s
– SCRAM starts at 10 s and finishes at 14 s
– Problem time: 180,000 s (50 hrs)
Overview of ATHENA Transient Analysis
Perform Research Task
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 20
He Case Approaches Matrix Temp. Limit*
CO2 He
*Containment pressure maintained
Understanding the Results
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 21
Containment Pres. Enhances Heat Transfer
Containment Volume: 6,063 m3
PQ m C T
m A Vρ
•
•
= ⋅ ⋅
= ⋅ ⋅
�
Understanding the Results
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 22
Containment Temp. Means More Design Work
Understanding the Results
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 23
Vessel Temperature Is A Design Challenge
Understanding the Results
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 24
CO2 Downcomer Flow Shows Flow Reversal
CO2 He
Understanding the Results
-
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Slide 25
Conclusions and Future Work
• The RELAP5 results compare well with expected temperature and pressure trends
• The temperature limit of the core matrix material may be reached when He is the coolant
• The densities of the two coolants play an important part in the DHRS performance
• Future work will include:– sensitivity studies on containment transient pressure– CO2 injection for the He DHRS– Analysis with CERMET fuel pins