gholipour a. 2010. organizational behavior. university of tehran

35
Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Upload: julian-pearson

Post on 11-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 2: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Organizational Behavior:Organizational Behavior:

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

PersonalityPersonality

Page 3: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Personality

• A person’s general style of interacting with the world

• People differ from one another in ways that are relatively consistent over time and place

Gholipour A. 2011. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 4: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

What is Personality?Personality

The sum total of ways in which an individual reacts and interacts with others.

Personality Traits

Enduring characteristics that describe an individual’s behavior.

Personality

Determinants• Heredity

• Environment

• Situation

Personality

Determinants• Heredity

• Environment

• Situation

Page 5: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Freud’s Structure of Personality

Conscious—Acute

awarenessPreconscious—Just

under awareness;easily known

Unconscious—Well

below awareness;Difficult to know but very influential

Sup

ere

go

Consciousness

Ego

Id

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 6: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

How the iceberg works

• Id– Functions on ‘pleasure principle’– Immediate gratification of needs to reduce tension &

discomfort regardless of consequences

• Superego– Functions on ‘idealistic principle’– Our moral guide/conscience– Influenced by internalizing our parents’ values & the voice

of society– Works against the Id by inflicting guilt

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 7: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

How the iceberg works (cont.)

• Ego– Functions on ‘reality principle’– Serves to balance the demands the Id and the Superego– Assesses what is realistically possible in satisfying the Id

and/or Superego (i.e., what society will deem acceptable)– Ego uses defense mechanisms to protect itself

• Personality is result of the battle for control between id, ego & superego

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 8: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Style ofDecision Making Judgmental (J)

Perceptive (P)

Preference forDecision Making Thinking (T)

Feeling (F)

Type of SocialInteraction Introvert (I)

Extrovert (E)

Preference forGathering Data Intuitive (N)

Sensing (S)

MBTI

Page 9: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Four MBTI Dichotomies

Extraversion – IntroversionE - I Dichotomy

Where do you prefer to focus your attention – and get your energy?

Sensing – Intuition S - N Dichotomy

How do you prefer to take in information?

Thinking – Feeling T - F Dichotomy

How do you make decisions?

Judging – PerceivingJ - P Dichotomy

How do you deal with the outer world?

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 10: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

E I• External

• Gregarious

• Interaction

• Internal

•Reflective

• Concentration

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 11: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

S N• Sequential

• Realistic

• Present

• Fact

• Random

• Theoretical

• Future

• Concept

• Specific • General

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 12: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

T F• Objective

• Detached

• Laws

• Firm Minded

• Subjective

• Involved

• Circumstances

• Fair Hearted

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 13: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

• JUDGERS

• CLOSURE

• SCHEDULED

• STRUCTURE

• DECIDED

• PERCEIVERS

• OPEN

• FLEXIBLE

• SPONTANEOUS

• WAIT AND SEE

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

J P

Page 14: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

PREADY AIM…

P

AIM… AIM…

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 15: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

JREADYFIRE…

J

AIM…

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 16: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

TYPE SUMMARY

ISTJResponsible

ISFJLoyal

INFJContemplative

INTJIndependent

ISTPPragmatic

ISFPArtistic

INFPIdealistic

INTPConceptual

ESTPSpontaneous

ESFPGenerous

ENFPOptimistic

ENTPInventive

ESTJHard Charging

ESFJHarmonizing

ENFJPersuasive

ENTJCommanding

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 17: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Occupational Trends by Type 

ISTJManagement

AdministrationLaw enforcement

Accounting

 

ISFJEducation

Health careReligious settings

 

INFJReligion

CounselingTeaching

Arts

INTJScientific or technical

fieldsComputers

Law

 

ISTPSkilled trades

Technical fieldsAgriculture

Law EnforcementMilitary

ISFPHealth care

BusinessLaw enforcement

 

INFPCounseling

WritingArts

 

INTPScientific or technical

fields

ESTPMarketing

Skilled tradesBusiness

Law enforcementApplied technology

 

ESFPHealth care

TeachingCoaching

Childcare workerSkilled trades

ENFPCounselingTeachingReligion

Arts

 

ENTPScience

ManagementTechnology

Arts

 

ESTJManagement

AdministrationLaw enforcement

 

ESFJEducation

Health careReligion

ENFJReligion

ArtsTeaching

 

ENTJManagementLeadership

Source: From Introduction to Type and Careers, A.L. Hammer, 1993, Consulting Psychologists Press

Page 18: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

General Population Distribution

• ISTJ 11.7%• ISTP 3.9%• ESTP 5.1%• ESTJ11.4%• ISFJ 7.9%• ISFP 3.9%• ESFP 4.7%• ESFJ 8%

• INFJ 3.7%• INFP5.7%• ENFP 8.2%• ENFJ 4.8%• INTJ 5.2%• INTP4.6%• ENTP 5.1%• ENTJ 6%

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 19: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

The Big Five Personality Dimensions

Extroversion: Outgoing, talkative, sociable, assertive

Agreeableness: Trusting, good natured, cooperative, soft hearted

Conscientiousness: Dependable, responsible, achievement oriented, persistent

Emotional stability: Relaxed, secure, unworried

Openness to experience: Intellectual, imaginative, curious, broad minded

Research finding: Conscientiousness is the best (but not a strong) predictor of job performance.

Page 20: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Achieving Person-Job Fit

Personality Types• Realistic• Investigative• Social• Conventional• Enterprising• Artistic

Personality Types• Realistic• Investigative• Social• Conventional• Enterprising• Artistic

Personality-Job Fit Theory (Holland)

Identifies six personality types and proposes that the fit between personality type and occupational environment determines satisfaction and turnover.

Page 21: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Holland’s Theory of Personality-Job Fit

Type Personality Occupations

Realistic

Investigative

Social

Conventional

Enterprising

Artistic

Shy, Stable, Practical

Analytical, Independent

Sociable, Cooperative

Practical, Efficient

Ambitious, Energetic

Imaginative, Idealistic

Mechanic, Farmer,Assembly-Line Worker

Biologist, Economist,Mathematician

Social Worker,Teacher, Counselor

Accountant, ManagerBank Teller

Lawyer, Salesperson

Painter, Writer,Musician

Page 22: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

– Absenteeism/ Turnover/ Job satisfaction/ Job performance

Locus of Control

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

• The concept was developed originally Julian Rotter in the 1950s

• Research has found the following trends:– Males tend to be more internal than females – As people get older they tend to become more internal – People higher up in organizational structures tend to be more

internal – Buchanan L. (2006): Imposter Syndrome

Page 23: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Machiavellianism

High Machs– Pragmatic, manipulative– Persuade others– Believe in ends can justify means, win more

Do high Machs make good employees? Type of job Bargaining Less rules and regulations

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 24: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Self Esteem

High on SE• Expectations for success

• Possess ability for success

• Willing to take risks

• Do not seek approval from others on their capabilities

• High on Job Satisfaction

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 25: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Risk Taking

• Decision making quick• Specific to jobs (stocks) (accounts)

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 26: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

A & B Types of Personality

• Type ‘A’– Always moving,

walking & eating fast– Feel impatient– Strive to do two or

more things at once– Cannot cope with

leisure time– Obsessed with

number; how many, how much they have achieved

• Type ‘B’– Never suffer from a

sense of time urgency– Feel no need to

display/discuss their achievements unless required

– Play for fun /relaxation

– Can relax without guilt

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 27: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

A & B Types of Personality

• Type ‘A’– Suffer high level of

stress– Quantity over quality– Time

pressure/deadlines– Rarely creative– Poor decision makers– Behavior is easier to

predict

• Type ‘B’– Difficult to predict

behavior– Good decision

makers– Quality of work– No compromise on

health– Wiser than hasty– Creative / innovative

solutions to same problemGholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 28: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Self-monitoring (Mark Snyder)

Page 29: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Self-monitoring (Mark Snyder)

• Concern for social appropriateness– Sensitive to self-presentation of others– Used as guidelines for monitoring own self-presentation

• Two components of self-monitoring– Interest in social information– Ability to control self-presentation

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 30: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Self-monitoring and attitude-behavior correlations

• High self-monitors have lower attitude-behavior correlations

• Their behavior is less reflective of their actual attitudes; more in line with what they think is socially appropriate

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Page 31: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Self-Efficacy

Sources of Self-Efficacy Beliefs:- Prior experience- Behavior models- Persuasion from others- Assessment of physical/emotional state

Self-efficacy: “A person’s belief about his or her chances of successfully accomplishing a specific task.”

Page 32: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

• Denial• Rationalization• Self-aggrandizement• Attributional egotism• Sense of entitlement• anxiety

Narcissism

Page 33: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Proactive Personality

• Hardy, • Proactive, • Scarlet.

Page 34: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Personality Tests

Culture

Emic or Etic

The Cult of Personality (Murphy Paul, 2004)

Page 35: Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran

The Big Five Personality Test

• Extroversion: 1, 6R, 11, 16, 21R, 26, 31R, 36

• Agreeableness: 2R, 7, 12R, 17, 22, 27R, 32, 37R, 42

• Conscientiousness: 3, 8R, 13, 18R, 23R, 28, 33, 38, 43R

• Neuroticism: 4, 9R, 14, 19, 24R, 29, 34R, 39

• Openness: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35R, 40, 41R, 44

Gholipour A. 2010. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.