giant coupling effects in confined 4 he ( what constitutes a weak link for 4 he?)
DESCRIPTION
Giant coupling effects in confined 4 He ( What constitutes a weak link for 4 He?) Francis M. Gasparini Department of Physics, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, U.S.A. Justin K. Perron Mark O. Kimball Kevin P. Mooney. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Giant coupling effects in confined 4He(What constitutes a weak link for 4He?)
Francis M. Gasparini
Department of Physics, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, U.S.A
Justin K. PerronMark O. KimballKevin P. Mooney
Silicon
SiO2
Silicon
4He L
h
7 8
Si wafers: 5cm diameter, 375 m thick
Boxes: 1, 2 m; 10 10 per cellFilm or channel: 10 30 nmSeparation: 2 6 m
Lh
S
s
Experimental cells for heat capacity and superfluid density
l
• One may view the helium in the boxes and in the film/channel as two phases of the same system• To what extent do these phases couple?• One may think, as in superconductors, that coupling should take place on the scale of the correlation length. This is not correct for 4He• How do the boxes-film system differ from a simpler, homogeneous confinement?
Statements and questions
Perron et al. Nature Phys. 6, 499-502 (2010)
http://enthalpy.physics.buffalo.edu/Publications
Specific heat for planar confinement
T T
/ 1t T T
Gasparini et al. RMP, 80,1009 (2008)
T T
Data collapse for planar confinement
Gasparini et al. RMP, 80,1009 (2008)
T T
Limited data collapse for planar confinement
T T
Specific heat for 0D confinement
T T
T T
Lack of collapse, 0D confinement
2 m boxes :
2 m 2
m
0.01 m1 m boxes :1 m 1 m 0.0 m
2
l w h
Lack of collapse, 0D confinement
Is there coupling among the boxes?
New cell design for 0D
Measurement of heat capacity
Heat capacity of film + boxes;;and, uniform film only
Perron et al. Nature Physics, 2010
Specific heat after subtraction for a uniform film
AFR resonance and superfluid density
Gasparini et al,. JLTP (2001)
sup e rfluid ve lo c ity
Example of resonance: temperature and phase
2 0.05 KT
3 0.002 0.024 m; boxes at 4 mD t l
Superfluid density for two films
bulk
expected BKT jump
Superfluid density and heat capacity
1/
scaling coupling
1/ 1/coupling 2micron 1micron
, ,C t C t l t Ct g tl
C C C
C g tl g tl t
Coupling in 1 micrometer boxes
T T
410 0.07,0.17 m
spacing of boxes 1 m edge to edge
connecting film has 0.02
bulk
c
t
t
Excess specific heat due to coupling
Summary• One may think of the boxes-film system as displaying both
coupling (box-to-box) and proximity effects (box-to-film) [helium; other critical systems]• These effects extend to much larger distances than the
correlation length [high-Tc superconductors]• It seems likely that this is due to the role of critical point
fluctuations, below and above T
[other critical systems]• Overall, this behavior goes beyond Josephson coupling [helium, superconductors]
Comment 1
Josephson effects in 4He
Sukhatme et al, Nature 2001: array of 24 slits
3 0.17 0.15 m m m w h l
Hoskinson et al., Nature 2006: array of circular apertures
0.04 0.05 m m diameter l
Both experiments show superflow in region where the slits or apertures should be normal. However, l~ .
200 nm
5.5 nm
T. P. Chen et al., JLTP, 1977
“Two-peaks” specific heatComment 2
Giant proximity effects in cuprate superconductors
Bozovic et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2004
LCOcT
0.6nmThickness of LCO: 1.3 to 20 nm
n
Comment 3
2D “Layered Ising lattice”
JJn = 4
M. E. Fisher, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 1969; Nature Physics, News and Views, 2010
Comment 4
J J
After Mamaladze and Cheishvili, Sov. Phys. JETP,1966 (Ginzburg-Pitaevskii equation)
bulk
s
x t
Slit, 32 nm
bulk slit
t
x
s
t
Comment 5
AX
AX
Mean field calculation
Role of dimensionality on the specific heat
Kimball et al. PRL, 2004/ 1T T
Comment 6
Corrected 0D dataComment 6
t TT
1
C O RRELATIO N LENG TH
-1
-1c ro sso ve r re g io n
-1
0
Correlation length is renormalized
/ 1T T
Comment 7
SEM micrograph of 2 micrometer boxes
T T
Specific heat for planar confinement
Gasparini et al. RMP, 80,1009 (2008)
Superfluid density for two films
bulk
expected tc
3 0.024 mcD t
Perron et al. Nature Physics, 2010
How uniform is the oxide?
Oxi
de th
ick.
(nm
)
X (mm)Y (mm)
Lack of scaling for planar confinement near maximum
L T va lv e
In d ium O -r in g
Sta in less s tee lca p illa ry
G erm an iumth erm om ete r
E v ap or ate dfilm hea te r
S iliconp iece B on d ed w afe rs
K a p ton s le ev e
C o p p e r w ire
C o pp ersta ge s
S 1
S 2
Cell staged on cryostat
Infrared picture of 0.3 micrometer cell
Surface of separation:1 micrometer boxes
Gasparini et al. RMP, 80,1009 (2008)