gilles metris on behalf the micrscope teamgram.oca.eu/.../28.g.metris.data_processing.pdf · gilles...
TRANSCRIPT
-
1 MICRSCOPE Colloquium II – 29-30 January 2013
Gilles METRIS on behalf the MICRSCOPE Team
-
2 MICRSCOPE Colloquium II – 29-30 January 2013
sensor 1
sensor 2
differential accelerometer
-
3 MICRSCOPE Colloquium II – 29-30 January 2013
• Calibration of the data means to go from the measured acceleration towards the applied acceleration
• Parameters used for the calibration can be obtained: – from on ground controls and models – from in flight assessments – from dedicated in flight calibration sessions
• The calibration can be more precise on some axis: in particular in flight calibration is optimised for the x sensitive axis
• Correction of the data means to go from the calibrated acceleration towards the signal of interest (mainly the EP violation signal)
• Corrections are generally applied only to differential accelerations • The most obvious correction concerns the gravity gradient
-
4 MICRSCOPE Colloquium II – 29-30 January 2013
• 3 sub-level differing mainly by their time organisation: N0c (sorted by session) are used for science
• Contain mainly: – Payload data (organised by sensor) – Satellite orbit – Satellite attitude, angular velocity and acceleration – Information on data gaps
-
5 MICRSCOPE Colloquium II – 29-30 January 2013
Biais
DC part of the acceleration not known precisely
Scale factors + axis coupling (symmetric matrix)
Test mass rotation
Quadratic terms Negligible (will be checked by in flight calibration)
Angular to linear acceleration coupling Negligible because dΩ/dt≅0
-
6 MICRSCOPE Colloquium II – 29-30 January 2013
• Accelerations, organised by session and by sensors • Calibrated with various level of complexity
• N1a: obtained from N0c by applying the same matrix all along the mission.
• N1b: obtained from N1a, using the parameters estimated from the most recent calibration session.
• N1c: obtained from N1a, using optimised parameters deduced from several calibration sessions (e.g. by interpolation between the previous and the next calibration session).
• N1c should be the most sophisticated level 1 data, but also the most impacted by the CMS expert ideas.
-
7 MICRSCOPE Colloquium II – 29-30 January 2013
• Lack of data can exist due to accelerometer saturations or transmission problems
• The duration of the gaps could extend from 1s (frequently) to 1mn (up to once per orbit) and even more (rarely).
• This can increase the projection of some perturbations on the Fep frequency (cf presentation by E. Hardy)
• To limit this effect, different actions are planed (cf presentation by E. Hardy)
– To fill the short gaps by reconstructing the lacking data – To “remove” a whole number of orbits in case of large gap
• The corresponding data will be well flagged
-
8 MICRSCOPE Colloquium II – 29-30 January 2013
-
9 MICRSCOPE Colloquium II – 29-30 January 2013
Terms in blue will be corrected
-
10 MICRSCOPE Colloquium II – 29-30 January 2013
• Accelerations, organised by session and by accelerometers • Separated in common and differential mode • Calibrated and corrected from perturbations • Optimised for the x component of the differential acceleration
• N2a: corrected from gravity gradient using off-centring estimated on ground
• N2b: corrected from gravity gradient using off-centring estimated in flight during the same EP session or the previous calibration session
• N2c: corrected from gravity gradient using off-centring considered as optimal and corrected from other effects according our understanding of the instrument
• N2b and N2c will be the data form which the EP signal will be extracted
-
11 MICRSCOPE Colloquium II – 29-30 January 2013
e = 0.005
fep
Correction of the gravity gradient effects
Gravity gradient (20 µm)
EP violation @ 10-15
Corrected gravity gradient (0.1 µm)
-
12 MICRSCOPE Colloquium II – 29-30 January 2013
• Different level of scientific data will be provided • Level 1 data are organised by inertial sensor and and
should be useful for – Estimating the Eötvös parameter from data weakly impacted by
CMS choices – Other applications (gravity, aeronomy…) less dependant on
differential mode
• Level 2 data are optimised for the differential mode – They will include some corrections – They will allow to estimate the Eötvös parameter with less
extended analyses
• Auxiliary data to help the analysis (orbit, attitude, gravity…) will be also available
-
13 MICRSCOPE Colloquium II – 29-30 January 2013