glasgow east women's aid (gewa)
DESCRIPTION
ÂTRANSCRIPT
We believe that Resilience is a key factor in protecting and promoting good mental health. It is the quality of being able to deal with the ups and downs of life and is based on self esteem.
Research shows that interventions that focus on improving the confidence, self-‐esteem, resilience & protective factors amongst people subsequently leads to either a reduction of substance misuse or
the likelihood that someone will become involved in substance misuse behaviours. The move towards more of a resilience approach using alcohol and drugs as a vehicle for
demonstrating resilience has grown naturally from work undertaken by GCA Prevention and Education, with a range of target groups. Resilience and Protective Factors have always been a key
consideration our in prevention and education approaches towards alcohol and drugs.
‘We helped the women to increase their resilience’
GROUP: KINSHIP CARE
LOCATION: EASTERHOUSE
PROGRAMME: RESILIENCE
DURATION: planned for 4 weeks but ran from Jan-‐ April 2014
PROGRAMME: RESILIENCE PILOT
DURATION: 6 WEEKS
BACKGROUND Glasgow East Women’s Aid (GEWA) works from a three stage therapeutic model underpinned by theoretical learning from Dr Judith Herman to address long term effects of gender based violence such as post-‐traumatic stress disorder (as most symptoms and residual effects of domestic abuse are categorised as PTSD). The therapeutic support staff engage with women in the counselling process to assist them with building self-‐esteem, raise their levels of self confidence, establish healthy routines and empower women to discard the negative thoughts and feelings associated with their experiences of domestic/sexual abuse. This work is undertaken on a one a one to one counselling and therapeutic group work basis. The stage one group promotes safety and well-‐being, leading to stage two focused individual work to empower women to integrate the impact of their traumatic experiences in order that they are no longer living in the traumatic events but can live them creating positive goals and outcomes. The overall aim, therefore, is to provide a service which gives women the space and time to recover from the effects of gender based violence and go on to live fulfilling and positive lives, leading to the possibilities of educational attainment and future employment.
From May to June 2014 we worked in partnership with GEWA to facilitate a resilience pilot with the women who are in stage three of their recovery process. It was agreed that the group of women would be a group of GEWA service users who had never met as a group beforehand.
The women taking part in the programme had all experienced domestic abuse in their lives and are meeting for support from each other, GCA facilitators, and from GEWA. We agreed that resilience based workshops were appropriate with this group as they are meeting to support one another and are all at different points on their journeys after experiencing domestic violence. We had worked with other groups of women within GEWA in the past on resilience which had evaluated well.
OVERALL AIM • To use alcohol and drug Prevention and Education interventions as a vehicle to demonstrate
the impact of resilience on children and families. OBJECTIVES
• To raise awareness of the concept of resilience. • To increase understanding of protective and risk factors and how these can influence
positive and negative attitudes and behaviours • Increase in knowledge around current drug trends and language to ensure that the carers
could communicate more confidently and easily around these subjects with the young people in their care.
• To increase resilience in the women in the group by showing them a range of tools that they can use
METHODS
Alcohol, drugs, domestic violence, resilience and self-‐esteem are potentially complex and sensitive issues and therefore the need to ensure the wellbeing of participants remained a priority at all times. The programme required some thought in terms of what can be realistically achieved within the sessions while allowing for fun activities and ice breakers each week, to help ensure the group feel comfortable with each other and with the facilitator, before discussing resilience. Additionally, the programme needed to be tailored to the groups’ needs so an overarching outline with the flexibility to develop/adapt once we had met the group was developed.
For the programme used our toolkit of resilience interventions and tools with the group. This included some of our activities that have been facilitated and evaluated and we know work well alongside some new activities to explore resilience.
TOOLKIT OF ACTIVITIES
ACTIVITY: ICEBREAKERS • ‘Share One Truth and One Lie’.
ACTIVITY: HEALTHY MIND PLATTER • Encouraged participants to explore their own lives and their wellbeing.
ACTIVITY: POSITIVITY NOTEPAD • Write positive things that people say about you.
ACTIVITY: POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE SELF TALK • Who do we listen to and why?
ACTIVITY: PROTECTIVE AND RISK FACTORS • Exploration of what is a risk and what is a protective factor with their own
resilience
ACTIVITY-‐ BALANCE WHEL • Looking at how balanced your life is
EVALUATION
EXAMPLE OF GOOD PRACTICE 1 Due to the vulnerable nature of the group, the facilitators were very experienced Prevention and Education workers (one facilitator was also COSCA trained and the other facilitator a professional Person Centred Counsellor with several years’ experience of working therapeutically with clients). We felt this was important due to the nature of the disclosures that some of the women might make.
EXAMPLE OF GOOD PRACTICE 2 During 2 of the 6 sessions of this programme we were unable to do almost any of the activities we had planned to do. This was because on these occasions some of the participants were in need of support and this dominated the sessions. We felt it was best practice to allow the participants to share with the group rather than press on with activities. What we then saw was the women in the group supporting one another which was an excellent outcome. In addition to this, we were able to support and listen to the participants, and GEWA staff were able to follow up any issues outwith the group setting. So whilst we did not plan for these two ‘support’ sessions to happen, we feel the appropriate actions were taken by all involved, and most importantly the participants received all of the support available to them at this time. In terms of our plans for the programme, this cut our delivery time unexpectedly down to 4 sessions. Accordingly, in future, we may plan for an 8 week programme where possible, to allow us more delivery time should similar issues occur.
EXAMPLE OF GOOD PRACTICE 3 We feel that for the activities we did each week with this group, the group always grasped the activity a bit better if we were able to show our own examples of completed activities as facilitators. So in future, we will make sure to always have a completed example of any activities we hope for the group to complete.
EXAMPLE OF GOOD PRACTICE 4 We planned to do various ‘pre-‐evaluation’ measures on week 1, but were unable to. This is partly because only 3 women of the expected 10 attended, and partly because one participant was quite emotional and dominated the conversation after a few introductory activities. With this being our first week meeting the women, we did not feel it would be appropriate to shut the participants down when they seemed to need emotional support.
EVALUATION
A pre and a post evaluation was carried out measuring ‘What does resilience mean to you?’ Place selves on a Resilience Scale (1-‐10) – individual decision and a discussion about various resilience and risk factors – recorded group discussion led by GCA facilitator. The participants were asked to scale 1-‐10 which participants placed their own drawing on based on how resilient they currently felt. As can be seen, 3 placed themselves in the middle, with one below this and one above this in the pre questions and in the post, only two of the participants who were there on week two for the pre-‐evaluation were there on week six, and both have moved their characters up to indicate they feel more resilient now. Two other women were also there on week 6, having dropped in and out of the programme and both have ranked their resilience as quite high.
Pre evaluation Post evaluation
QUALITATIVE EXAMPLE: THE BALANCE WHEEL ‘One participant identified that all her time and energy was currently being spent on her daughter who she was having difficulties with. She felt this was important for the moment, but identified that in the coming months she would like to see an improvement in her relationship with her daughter, so she can have some time and energy for herself and her own development.’