global project finance – managing, structuring and distributing risk
DESCRIPTION
Global Project Finance (GPF) investing is increasingly requiring strong skills on the side of the Arranger (the “risk allocator”) in order to realize adequate return benefits, while avoiding disproportionate risk that might preclude risk transfer. - Mark TuminelloTRANSCRIPT
Global Project Finance – Managing, Structuring and Distributing Risk
Global Project Finance (GPF) investing is increasingly requiring strong skills on the
side of the Arranger (the “risk allocator”) in order to realize adequate return benefits,
while avoiding disproportionate risk that
might preclude risk transfer.
GPF underwriters earn their “premium” in a risk adverse financial world by
assuming risk (capital formation, risk transfer and providing liquidity).
An emphasis on price transparency and efficiency is
now becoming more pronounced.
Bank arrangers appear to be playing an increasing role in the GPF
marketplace, primarily as providers of liquidity, and as a risk transfer agency.
Investors can commit capital to a variety of different asset classes (examples include equity, fixed income, commodities, hard
assets and foreign exchange).
Investors are increasingly seeking to take advantage of more flexible investment opportunities in search of higher yield, towards multiple asset classes, trading
styles and markets.
The attributes of investing in GPF, traditionally a risk retention
investment approach, with term take-out from the insurance market,
is now poised to have its asset performance measured across
credit, market, liquidity and model risk.
Improving the measurement of these sources of risk should be a strategic resource, guiding capital deployment
and risk syndication by banks.
In considering an appropriate retention level, the maximum amount of economic
loss across the committed GPF investment period (interim and term) must be
estimated.
Risk can only be priced after it is appropriately
measured.
Analysis by Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s reveals that recovery rates are higher for term GPF exposures then comparably rated corporate debt.
GPF strategies are risk-controlled, diversified/long bias investments, focused
on project related assets (with some commodity attributes, though more stable).
GPF is a low correlation alternative investment
class.
Arrangers are increasingly sourcing and identifying suitable underwriting and
principal investing opportunities that can produce high risk adjusted returns.
More generally GPF appears to be low frequency default risk, characterized by certain sector defaults evidencing
high severity exposures.
Global Project Finance – Managing, Structuring and Distributing Risk