global strategy & organization - mit opencourseware in sweden (~1955-70). i. ikea’s...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Global Strategy & Organization Joe Santos Class ���4�����
1
![Page 2: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
“Home, Sweet Home”
2
�
�������courtesy of��������������)left*+ 6��� �6��� ���)right)����7� �!��
![Page 3: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
3
Arrive at IKEA warehouse Drop off kids Shop for furniture Consult store personnel
Get food with family Shop for small goods Pick up at warehouse
Checkout Transport to home Build furniture
I K E AI K E A
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.
![Page 4: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
IKEA ������������ ���������
(Source: Ikea) 4
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.
TURNOVER (million EURO)Of all IKEA stores
(Sales tax excluded)
STORESAll operate under
franchise Inter IKEA Systems B.V
CATALOGUES (millions)Printed in 56 editions
and 27 languages
VISITS (millions)To all IKEA stores
world-wide
1
0.5 2 6,8 35
72
145 16
0 174 19
1 199
199
0.05 1.6 8.252.1
125.6 400.
8
453.
8
504.
2
583.
1
1 2 9 52 114 20
1 220 23
7 260 28
5 301
631.
8
660.
1
19541964
197419
8419
9420
0420
0520
0620
0720
08
2009
25 169 1,216
4,396
13,5
70
15,2
12
17,6
58
20,6
85
22,4
98
22,7
13
19541964
1974
1984
1994
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
19541964
197419
8419
9420
0420
0520
0620
0720
08
2009
19541964
197419
8419
9420
0420
0520
0620
0720
08
2009
![Page 5: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
IKEA�s business model (�radical�) innovation: Large scale �build-to-stock� + instant satisfaction (and more) at a low price
Furniture Design
Production Delivery Assembly Store for Display and Order
The traditional furniture business: Low scale �build-to-order� + slow full-service at a high price
Outsourcing partnerships
in LCCs
…… by customer ……
Sweden (~1955 ~1970)
5
Furniture Design
Production Self-service, warehouse+ retail store
Catalogue, Advertising Assembly Delivery
![Page 6: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
“Home, Sweet Home”
����������� ���������������������������� ��������� �� �����
�������courtesy of��������������)���*+ , ������-����)���*+ 2����3��������!�)� ����*, 6��� �6��� ���)������*����7� �!��
6
![Page 7: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
�����is Swedish because…
1. The non-mobile resources required to produce its breakthrough innovation were available in Sweden
2. It found the optimal combination of resources through an emergent process of interaction with local customers, competitors, and shareholders in Sweden (~1955-70).
i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local
optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter, 1990) …
ii. … and it found such local optimum with superior efficiency than other Swedish companies to whom the same resources and combinatorial context were available …
iii. … and it increased its geographic scope in such a way that its original national advantage was at least maintained.
7
![Page 8: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
National companies … turned “global”
38���������9� ������9�:�������3����� ��9���� ��;� �����9�6�<�����=��9��>3��9��-6�9�?�����9�7����9����� ��9�-�� ���
8
![Page 9: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
The primacy of “Home, Sweet Home”
� The home-base of the “national” company turned global success provided the company with a set of key success factors:
� The ideal cultural context and institutional environment � Local access to superior technologies and organizational capabilities
� The origin of critical resources, key suppliers and complements � Intense competition
� The most demanding customer base
� Lead (advanced/knowledgeable) users
(Sources: M. Porter; Kogut, Redding, … ( Marshall, Vernon, Krugman, Lorenzoni, von Hippel…)
)
9
![Page 10: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
(Source: Porter)
The “competitive advantage of nations”
10
Factor (Input) Conditions
Context for Firm Strategy and Rivalry
Demand Conditions
Related and Supporting Industries
A local context and rules thatencourage investment and sustained upgrading (e.g.,Intellectual property protection)
Meritocratic incentive systems across institutionsOpen and vigorous competitionamong locally based rivals
Sophisticated and demandinglocal customer(s)
Local customer needs thatanticipate those elsewhereUnusual local demand in specialized segments that can be served nationally and globally
Access to capable, locallybased suppliers and firms in related fields
Presence of clusters insteadof isolated industries
Human resources
Physical infrastructureAdministrative infrastructureInformation infrastructure
Natural resources
Scientific and technologicalinfrastructure
Capital resources
Presence of high quality, specializedinputs available to firms
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.
![Page 11: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
The Cluster as Home
38��������9� � ����;������9�:6�9�?��������9�7���
11
![Page 12: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
The primacy of “Home, Sweet Home”
� The home-base of the “national” company turned global success provided the company with a set of key success factors:
� The ideal cultural context and institutional environment � Local access to superior technologies and organisational capabilities
� The origin of critical resources, key suppliers and complements � Intense competition
� The most demanding customer base
� Lead (advanced/knowledgeable) users
Sources: M. Porter; Kogut, Redding, … ( Marshall, Vernon, Krugman, Lorenzoni, von Hippel…)
12
![Page 13: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Shimano’s Timeline
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
1920s
1930s
1940s
1950s
1960s
1970s
1980s
1990s
2000s
2010s
Major external events
Major company events
Com
pany
foun
ded
Com
pany
exp
ands
in A
sia
Com
pany
ree
stab
lishe
d af
ter
war
3 sp
eed
hub,
Com
pany
be
gin
expo
rts
to U
S,
acce
sses
tec
hnol
ogy
in
US
Japa
n ex
pand
s in
Asi
a
WW
II
PRC
Oil
emba
rgo/
Nix
on s
hock
Euro
pean
s “r
einv
ent”
bi
cycl
ing
Dow
nhill
em
erge
s in
US
Rise
of
Chin
a, I
ndia
Reca
ll
Foun
ders
dea
th
Offs
horin
g
SPD
Keiz
o S.
die
s SR
AM s
uit
Euro
rac
ing
13
![Page 14: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
Internationalization 1.: Exploiting Capabilities
• What capability(ies) do we have that we seeking to exploit internationally?
• Do they pass the RATs test in a particular target country: – Are they Relevant? – Are they Appropriable? – Are they Transferable?
Source: Lessard et al, 2012 (forthcoming)
Home-based capabilities
Target country Market Position/ Customer Value
Exploit
RAT
14
![Page 15: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
Internationalization 2.: Enhancing Capabilities
• What capability(ies) might we tap in a particular target country?
• Apply the CATs test: • Are they Complementary? • Are they Appropriable? • Are they Transferable?
Source: Lessard et al, 2012 (forthcoming)
Enhance
Augmented capabilities
at home
Target country- derived
capabilities
CAT
15
![Page 16: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
Internationalization: The Full Cycle
Source: Lessard et al, 2012 (forthcoming)
Home-based resources/ capabilities
Target country Market Position/ Customer Value
Exploit
RAT
Enhance
Augmented capabilities
at home
Target country- derived
capabilities
CAT
16
![Page 17: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
(Source: Renault-Nissan Corp. docs.) For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
Renault-Nissan
@��� !�A��B������������� ����� �A��� �������������������������,����������0 ����� ��C�!������6�����#'+�"$$$�
1999
�����0?3�;��D0�9�<3C�0�C�D0�C���,������90 �������� ����� ������ E��������������������������� ���� �!�����������9��������� ���9�C���������� ���������������������������������������������+������������������� �� ����+��������9�� ���������� ��+�������
� ���������� ����9�C������������������ ��������� ��������� ��� ���� � ��������������
2004
17
![Page 18: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
Japanese? French?
(Source: Corp. presentations)
��������������0 ���������,�������������������������������������� ��������� �� ����
18
![Page 19: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
In a Global World :
• The �cost of distance� is so low that it … • Eliminates the profitability of arbitraging things that are easy to move • Increases the intensity of global competition and transnational production • Traditional sources of superior performance (such as scale or low labor cost)
become requirements for normal performance (that is, for competitive parity, not competitive advantage)
• Competitive advantage is primarily based on knowledge (skills, technologies, user experience, …) and other * intangibles (reputation, culture, institutions) that are very hard to move or copy.
• Knowledge (of the “hard to move” kind) is increasingly dispersed around the world (Source: Doz, Santos, & Williamson,“From Global to Metanational”)
19
![Page 20: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
Global Advantage: National or Metanational?
National Metanational
Superior performance Superior performance depends on the attributes depends on the capabilities of the (“pitch”) of national origin organisation and management team
Projecting to the World Learning from the World
(Porter, 1990) (Doz, Santos, & Williamson, 2001)
20
![Page 21: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
Technical Knowledge (own)
Technical Knowledge (supplier)
User Knowledge
Business / Market Knowledge
The Roots of Competitive Advantage and Global Market Leadership
Innovating by melding home-base knowledge or globally dispersed knowledge?
21
![Page 22: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
The Roots of Global Superior Performance
Augmenting home base advantage by exploiting
capabilities and market insights from different countries
Projecting home base advantage into different countries
National National Plus
Sensing and melding multiple capabilities and market insights
across countries
Metanational
National exploration provides the sufficient factors for competitive advantage
at the World level
National exploration provides necessary factors that are complemented globally for
competitive advantage at the World level
International exploration provides the sufficient factors for competitive advantage
at the National or World level
22
![Page 23: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
For the Sloan Fellows - © Jose Santos, 2012
Why Internationalize
“National” Advantage Internationalizing to exploit home-based competitive advantage. The World as a source of efficiency and continuous improvement.
“National Plus” Advantage Internationalize to exploit and enhance home advantage.
The World as a source of efficiency and discontinuous improvement.
“Metanational” Advantage Internationalize to create competitive advantage.
The World as a source of breakthrough innovation.
23
IKEA
Shimano
Renault Nissan
![Page 24: Global Strategy & Organization - MIT OpenCourseWare in Sweden (~1955-70). i. IKEA’s performance worldwide was superior because the local optimum in Sweden was a global optimum (Porter,](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030418/5aa44e067f8b9ab4788bb5d2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
MIT OpenCourseWarehttp://ocw.mit.edu
15.220 Global Strategy and OrganizationSpring 2012
For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.