go%20to%202040%20fed%20support
DESCRIPTION
http://www.ilapa.org/CMS/3_25_11/GO%20TO%202040%20Fed%20Support.pdfTRANSCRIPT
GO TO 2040 and
Federal Support for Local Planning
APA – Chicago Metro Section
Federal Legislation Supporting Local Planning
March 25, 2011
CMAP Background
Formed by state law in
2005 to integrate
planning for
transportation and
land use
Seven-county area, with
geographically
representative Board
GO TO 2040 Regional Vision
Major themes:
• environment
• housing and social systems
• economy and infrastructure
• governance
Overarching themes of quality
of life, equity, sustainability,
and innovation
Research and Technical Analysis
“Regional snapshots” on existing conditions
“Strategy papers” on potential plan recommendations
Over 50 research papers produced
Scenario Development and Evaluation
“Scenarios” as alternative
future directions
• Framework for discussing
investment and policy choices
• Describe, illustrate, and
measure alternatives and
their consequences
Key Recommendations
Livable Communities
1. Land Use and Housing
2. Water and Energy
Conservation
3. Parks and Open Space
4. Local Food
Human Capital
5. Education and Workforce
Development
6. Economic Innovation
Efficient Governance
7. Tax Policy
8. Access to Information
9. Coordinated Investments
Regional Mobility
10. Transportation Investments
-- major capital projects
11. Public Transit
12. Freight
Key Themes of GO TO 2040
1. Framed in terms of economy
2. Prioritized recommendations
3. Policy plan, rather than land use plan
4. Organized as “campaign”
5. Focused on implementation
1. Economic Focus
Four major factors of long-term economic growth:
Modern infrastructure
Supportive business
environment High quality of life
Skilled workforce
2. Prioritized Recommendations
• Twelve sections, each with implementation action
areas, specific recommended actions, and the
identification of lead implementer(s)
• Key recommendations are extensive, but not
exhaustive – many topics are given a “supportive”
treatment
• Transportation recommendations based on
financial realities and “fiscal constraint”
3. Policy-Based Plan
Based on governance of Chicago metropolitan area: local
control of land use, regional advisory role
Greater ability of regional agency to affect larger policy
issues (e.g. tax policy) than individual land use decisions
4. Plan as “Campaign”
Launch event:
4. Plan as “Campaign”
Media coverage:
4. Plan as “Campaign”
Personalizing plan recommendations:
5. Focused on Implementation
Examples of ongoing implementation work related to
land use and housing recommendation:
• Technical assistance to local governments,
supported by federal Sustainable Communities
Initiative
• Grant program for local governments to be
launched in April
Technical Assistance and Grant Summary
Local technical assistance
•Primarily staff assistance
•Funded through HUD
grant as part of federal
Sustainable Communities
Initiative
•Currently underway
Local grants
•Grants to local
governments – used for
consulting assistance
•Funded through federal
transportation funds,
coordinated with RTA
•To be launched in April
Sustainable Communities Initiative
• Joint federal program involving DOT, HUD, EPA
• Funds CMAP’s local technical assistance program
• Purpose: implement GO TO 2040 plan through
assistance to communities
• Desired result: program of local projects that advance
the implementation of GO TO 2040
Project Applications
• Projects prioritized through request for assistance
• Six criteria used:
• Alignment with GO TO 2040
• Community need
• Feasibility of implementation
• Collaboration with other groups
• Input from stakeholders
• Geographic balance
Project Applications
• Over 220 project
proposals received from
130 applicants
• Major types:
• New or updated
comprehensive plans
• Revisions to zoning
ordinances or other local
regulations
• Small-area studies or plans
• Topic-specific projects –
water, sustainability,
housing, others
Project Prioritization – Community Need
• Need for assistance – responds to goal of HUD grant to
provide assistance to disadvantaged groups
• Estimated using socioeconomic statistics and size
Project Prioritization – Geographic Balance
Types of Technical Assistance
• Priority projects to be advanced in various ways,
including:
• Direct allocation of staff time, based locally if
desired (for larger projects)
• Allocation of staff time, but based in CMAP offices
(for smaller projects)
• Leadership by partner organizations, supporting role
for CMAP
• Scoping project and assisting in securing grant funds
and consultant assistance (for specialized or
especially complex or large projects)
Sample Project:
“Green and Healthy Chicago” planning project
• Initially submitted to HUD as Community Challenge application
• Submitted by City of Chicago Department of Housing
and Economic Development – cosponsored by LISC
• Addresses housing, open space, local food in
Englewood, Washington Park, and Woodlawn
Sample Project:
interjurisdictional housing planning
• Projects submitted in south,
west, and northwest Cook –
continuation of Homes for a
Changing Region
Sample Project:
Sustainable Food Economy in Lake County
• Submitted by Liberty Prairie
Conservancy – supported by
government and education
institutions
• Includes:
• planning and research (with
forest preserve district and
community college)
• integrating sustainable local
food production in model
area
Program Timelines
Local technical assistance
•Initial call for projects and
prioritization complete
•Work on some projects
underway, many more
being scoped
•Next call likely in late
summer or fall 2011
Local grants
•Call for projects begins
April 6 – coordinated with
RTA programs
•Applications due June 9
•Preliminary program of
projects determined in
August