good practice: programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing ›...

25
INFORM webinar on the evaluation of communication activities | 20 September 2018 Good practice: Programme communication evaluation Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE | Frank Schneider | Head of Communication and Public Policy

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jun-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

INFORM webinar on the evaluation of communication activities | 20 September 2018

Good practice: Programme communication evaluation

Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE | Frank Schneider | Head of Communication and Public Policy

Page 2: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 2

EU COHESION POLICY AND INTERREG

Page 3: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 3

INTERREG TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION

Page 4: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 4

INTERREG CENTRAL EUROPE

Page 5: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 5

COMMUNICATION CONTRIBUTES TO PROGRAMME SUCCESS

Page 6: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 6

BUT DOES IT REALLY?

EVALUATION AND MONITORING

WILL HELP US TO FIND OUT AND IMPROVE

Page 7: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 7

WITH THIS GOAL IN MIND WE HAVE TAKEN

3 STEPS TO BETTER EVALUATION

Think of evaluation in the communication strategy

Regularly monitor progress and collect data

Integrate communication evaluation into programme evaluation

Page 8: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

Think of evaluation in

the communication strategy

Step 1

Page 9: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 9

Define communication objectivesMake sure they are linked to management objectives

Page 10: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 10

Define result indicators for evaluationAs for example for knowledge increase of applicants

Page 11: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 11

Define output indicators for monitoring As for example for programme conferences

Page 12: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

Regularly monitor progress

and collect data

Step 2

Page 13: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 13

Example: Our social media planning tool

Page 14: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 14

Example: Our social media monitoring tool

Page 15: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 15

Example: Our social media monitoring tool

Page 16: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

Integrate communication

evaluation into the

programme evaluation

Step 3

Page 17: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 17

External operational evaluation: The process

Task4:Projectm

anagement&qualitycontrol

Task1:Methodology

Task3:EvaluationPart2

Task2:EvaluationPart1

2.1:Man-agement

structures

2.2:Programmecommunication

2.3:Projectapplication &

selection

ReportPart1 3.1:Man-agement

settings

3.2:Projectcycle&support to

beneficiaries

3.3:Imple-mentation

progress

3.4:Stakeholderinvolvementas

beneficiaries

3.5:Horizontalprinciples

3.6:EU2020&macroregional

strategies

FinalReport

Update

3.7:UpdatePart1

Inception Report

Page 18: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 18

Evaluation methods

Document analysis

Cooperation programme document & annexes

Programme communication strategy and brand manual

Data analysis

Survey data

Monitoring data from digital sources

Feedback on programme events

Interviews

With all programme bodies

Page 19: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 19

Evaluation questions

Effectiveness of internal communication

within the programme management

How are the interactions between the programme bodies?

Relevance and effectiveness of

programme communication strategy

How well is the programme reaching out to applicants?

Is the strategy for programme communication sound? Does communication

contribute to reaching the specific programme management objectives?

How effective are the approaches for reaching the communication

objectives (e.g. for involving competent partners)?

Page 20: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 20

Evaluation conclusions by external evaluators

Effectiveness of internal communication

within the programme management

Good and open communication culture in the programme

Good and timely flow of information between programme bodies

Page 21: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 21

Evaluation conclusions by external evaluators

Relevance and effectiveness of programme communication strategy

Sound, concrete and coherent

Clear & well-founded intervention logic

Lessons learned actively used to improve communication

Tailored communication

Output & result indicators and baseline & target values – clear & measurable

Generally clear roles and responsibilities

Page 22: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 22

Evaluation conclusions by external evaluators

Relevance and effectiveness of programme communication strategy

Implementation progress is fine

Progress on spending in line with plan/expectations

Planned activities fully implemented

Social media activities behind expectations (in 2016, before we launched the

#cooperationiscentral campaign)

Some indicators with high or 'over-achievement'

Page 23: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 23

Evaluation conclusions by external evaluators

Relevance and effectiveness of programme communication strategy

Effective and good outreach to stakeholders

Programme has been effective in reaching out to programme stakeholders

High share of programme newcomers attracted.

But: no data on the share of newcomers among successful applicants

Good representation of private sector entities as project partners

But: imbalanced geographic distribution of the applicants

But: low number of projects received under priority 4

Additional priority-specific outreach and support is needed

Page 24: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 24

THANKS TO MONITORING AND EVALUATION

WE ARE CONSTANTLY IMPROVING…

www.interreg-central.eu/cooperationiscentral

Page 25: Good practice: Programme communication evaluation › regional_policy › sources › informing › webinar › ... · Task 3: Evaluation Part 2 Task 2: Evaluation Part 1 2.1: M an-agement

Frank Schneider

Head of Communication and Public Policy

+43 1 8908088-2411

[email protected]

www.interreg-central.eu

facebook.com/InterregCE

twitter.com/InterregCE

Linkedin.com/in/interregce

youtube.com/interregcentraleurope