google haas summit 10/09 -- why the long tail business model is flawed
DESCRIPTION
Presentation at the Google Haas Summit October 1, 2009: "Why the Long Tail Business Model is Flawed" by Jeffrey C. UlinTRANSCRIPT
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
Why the Long Tail Business Model is Flawed
Jeff Ulin
GoogleplexOctober 1, 2009
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
So…Why Won’t the Long Tail Work?
• Long Tail: Consumption shift to niche product with infinite shelf space, and infinite shelf life– More product sees light of day– All product always available
• Will these dynamic changes expand the pie, and improve ability to monetize?
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
No. But why is that the case?
• Why is easier, better, broader access to all content less profitable to content suppliers?
• To understand, need to understand the notion of windows, and perhaps more importantly the values underlying windows
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
Long Tail is already exploited via windows
• Traditional media is already exploiting the long tail of most of the product people want to see– Video: greater depth of content than theatrical– Pay TV: fills up airtime with hits and misses– Free + Cable TV: syndication and off peak slots
provide filler space for product not warranting premium placement
• Windows already optimize
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
Theatrical
Video6 months
3 months Pay TV
3 months
Rested (“Black”)
6 months
15 months
PPV(residential)
Free TV
Multiple yearsSegmented Periods Licensing Rights for 5-10 years
Historical Film Windows
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
Change in Points of Access
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
The Online Platypus- Wide Tail
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
Window system caters to infinite shelf life
• Window system = lifecycle management• With online, the tail is wider (more product)
– But not necessarily longer (especially for product that people want to see)
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
More content, easier to access…what’s the problem?
• Value is driven by the whole ecosystem, and it is not just about longer and wider
• Value is driven by a unique matrix:– Time– Exclusivity– Differential Pricing– Repeat Consumption
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
Ulin’s Rule of Monetization
Four Drivers of Distribution Value
Mix of Factors Drive Value
TIME Immediacy to see + Longtail
DIFFERENTIAL PRICING Buy a ticket, rent a DVD, see free on TV
REPEAT CONSUMPTION Theater, Video, TV
EXCLUSIVITY ‘only see it here’ competitive effect
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
Online is attacking the pillars holding up the window system
• One leg (factor) not easily substituted: in the ecosystem, the legs work better together– If you see pressure on one of
the legs/value pillars, then likely a window tussle between old and new
• Online tends toward free and non-exclusive
• Why not migrate what’s worked offline to online, marrying the best of optimization with easier access and lower transaction costs?
Four Drivers of Distribution Value
Mix of Factors Drive Value
TIME Immediacy to see + Longtail
DIFFERENTIAL PRICING Buy a ticket, rent a DVD, see free on TV
REPEAT CONSUMPTION Theater, Video, TV
EXCLUSIVITY ‘only see it here’ competitive effect
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
That’s what is happening
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
Same Market (sort of), New Name
Convergence Lexicon
Streaming Download VOD New Technology
TV Sell Thru Rental Changing traditional marketVideo Video
Electronic On New Name MarketInternet TV Sell Thru Demand
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
User options can migrate
• Netflix: subscribe to rent
• Amazon: a la carte purchase
• Hulu + YouTube: free ad supported (TV)
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
But Value Undermined if Persistent VOD–Windows Still Optimize
Netflix Subscribe to Rent (Subscription)
Amazon Purchase to Own (VOD)
Hulu Ad Supported (like Free TV)
Supports:
•Differential Pricing
•Repeat Consumption
•Immediacy and Long Tail
•Exclusivity
But only if Window
Hulu – “catch up” = immediate
– Long Tail = can undermine repeat consumption in other exclusive markets (e.g., Pay TV, Syndication)
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
Huge Value at Stake- = $ in TV and Video fueled by windowing and exclusivity
• Pay TV networks– Will pay $1B for single studio output. But only if exclusive
• Free TV (syndicated + international)– Will pay $$ which amortizes production cost, and can
be holy grail, but only if exclusive• Video: About ½ of
Studio Total Revenue(Courtesy of SNL Kagan)
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
Already multiple bites at the apple:2nd and 3rd bites often the biggest
• Persistent VOD access will shrink the overall pie– But, windowed and
managed VOD access will preserve
– Under a windowed system, the 2nd and 3rd
bites can be larger
Bite 1
Exclusivity & Competitive Effect make value disproportionately large
Bite 2 Bite 3
Nibbles
Long Tail
BiggerBite 1
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
Pay TV Consequences
• Pay TV in DANGER if Long Tail VOD applied absolutely. Why?
• Pay TV = aggregator of content– If VOD = same content, what’s the value of a
Pay TV service?– Pay TV may only survive by original
programming, which is already a key driver in subscriptions.
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
Buyers and Advertisers ≠ Infinite
Number of web pages outstrips number of viable advertisers
Infinite Shelf Space & Infinite Content
$
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
More product, if niche, just means that it may be fighting for marginal $
Persistent VOD Model– a natural outgrowth of the long tail--eliminates certain value drivers and likely leads to smaller pie for content owners
The YouTube challenge? Maybe the service wins, but not necessarily the premium content provider
Long and Wide Tail adds infinite competition to an already marginalized tail
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
The Answer? No Magic Bullet
• Online is just another ecosystem through which the value drivers operate
• Amazon – own; Netflix – subscribe; Hulu – FOVD (TV)
• Eliminating shelf space and transaction costs, more content (Platypus wide tail) can be pushed through the system indefinitely (long tail), – But the system needs to incorporate the content value
drivers to optimize: Manage, don’t discard windows• Catch Up is a Type of Window
– More content, always available, will not maximize• Maybe an aggregation service may win (YouTube,Hulu), but
not the providers of content fighting for a smaller $ pie
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
Appendix
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
TV- the Simplest of the Systems
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
Application to Free TV• Does Hulu represent less value?
– Likely diminishes syndication value on TV– Exclusive? Sort of…– Ad Rates: more akin to syndication?
• Non-simultaneous viewing vs. live• How should it be priced? Syndication is priced on a local level, but
this is “global” syndication• Should this be captured as part of ratings, like DVR?
– Undermine international pricing/sales?
• Can Expand the pie if coupled with windows- “Catch up”is a type of window. Persistent VOD is not
Copyright Jeff Ulin 2009. All rights reserved.
Free TV Consequences
• Where content debuts is the fundamental Question– What is Hulu? Free TV, Internet TV, VOD?
• Currently “catch up” online, but what about shows premiering to a bigger online base
• If premiere on Hulu, then goes to TV, is that TV?• TV programming may come to mean content that
at some point is branded with TV, or which sometime in initial lifecycle is available via TV