governance in project environments
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Miles Shepherd
![Page 2: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
AgendaIntroductions
Analysis Framework
Practicalities
Close
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 2
![Page 3: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Analysis Framework
2
Just So stories (1902)
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 8
![Page 4: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Analysis FrameworkFactor
What – is Governance
Why – is it needed
When – is it applied
Where – does it fit in the project lifecycle
Who – is responsible
How – is it done
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 9
![Page 5: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
What?Definitions
ISO 21503
PMI
APM
Others
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 10
![Page 6: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
DictionaryOED
The action or manner of governing a state, organization, etc.
Derivation:
Plato
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 11
![Page 7: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Project Management InstituteProject Governance
The alignment of project objectives with the strategy of the larger organisation by the project sponsor and project team. A project’s governance is defined by and is required to fit within the larger context of the program or organisation sponsoring it, but is separate from organisational governance.
PMBOK (2013) p553
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 12
![Page 8: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
APM Definition
Governance refers to the set of policies, regulations, functions, processes, procedures and responsibilities that define the establishment, management and control of projects, programmes and portfolios.
APM Body of Knowledge (2012) p8
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 13
![Page 9: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
ISO 21500Governance is the framework by which an organisation is directed and controlled. Project Governance includes but is not limited to, those areas of organisational governance that are specifically related to project activities.
ISO 21500: 2012 p6, §3.6
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 14
![Page 10: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Others OECD – Principles for Corporate Governance (2015)
Revised 2014 – 2015 – Some significant changes.
British Standards Institute – BS 13500: 2013
Both documents do not specifically refer to Governace in relation to Project Management
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 15
![Page 11: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
ContextOrganisation
ProjectManagement
CorporateGovernance
GoPM
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 16
![Page 12: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Why Governance is NeededPublic Pressure Nature of Projects
Enron Worldcom BP Gulf disaster
Temporary organisationsSeparate structuresResponsibility splits
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 17
![Page 13: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Theories supporting GovernanceShareholder theory
Stakeholder theory
Agency Theory
Transaction Cost Economics
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 18
![Page 14: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Shareholder Theory Assumes the main purpose of the organisation is
to maximise shareholder Return on Investment (ROI).
Organisation is the property of the shareholders.
Structures needed to assure managerial action must always be in the best interest of the shareholders.
Value system privileges shareholders over other stakeholders.
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 19
![Page 15: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Shareholder Theory - CriticismGood for:
Clear focus
Relatively simple to establish compliance regime
Weaknesses:
Ignores other stakeholders
Often results in poor financial results
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 20
![Page 16: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Stakeholder Theory Takes broader view of social responsibility
Views Firm as a system of stakeholders
Recognises wider environment
Purpose of Firm is to create wealth and value for all stakeholders
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 21
![Page 17: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Stakeholder Theory - CriticismGood for:
Longer term view of objectives
Traditional financial objectives
CSR
Public Image
Coordination of corporate knowledge
Weaknesses:
Often difficult to balance stakeholder needs
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 22
![Page 18: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Transaction Cost Economics Often associated with front end management of projects
Focuses on individual transactions which converts inputs to desired outputs
Based on Make of Buy decision
Regards Firm as governance structure rather than a production function
Make Buy
Pro Better control of fit for purposeCosts for poor adaption are minimised
Lower price through economies of scale & market place competition
Con Higher cost Adaption costs higher
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 23
![Page 19: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
TCE - CriticismGood for:
Simple relationships
Buyer – Seller situations
Flexibility of governance structures (recognises that stakeholder –shareholder views are a continuum)
Weaknesses:
Crude models
Underdeveloped trade-offs
Severe measurement issues
Too much freedom of action
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 24
![Page 20: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Agency Theory Occurs when an Agent acts on behalf of a Principal
e.g. a PM as Agent, Project Sponsor as Principal in most situations!
Supports shareholder theory
Expects both parties to have their own interests
Agent and Principal will try to maximise own interests
Requires balance of reward and performance systems
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 25
![Page 21: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Agency Theory Issues Interests of Principal and Agent often diverge
Principal cannot easily monitor performance of the Agent
Principal cannot easily gain information held by the Agent
Difficulty of appointing appropriate Agent (ex ante or adverse selection problem)
Information asymmetries caused by incomplete information (ex post or moral hazard problem)
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 26
![Page 22: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Agency Theory - Criticisms Takes an inherent investor view
Assumes humans are mainly motivated by financial gain
Costs arising from:
Creating and structuring contracts between Principals and Agents
Monitoring expenditure by the Principal
Bonding expenditure by the Agent
Residual losses resulting from self interest actions
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 27
![Page 23: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Trust and ControlDifferent relationships between governance and trust can exist:
Trust may enhance impact of governance on performance
Governance may reduce the level of trust between agent and principal
Ex ante trust in projects may influence the level of governance complexity
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 28
![Page 24: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Where in the Life Cycle
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 29
![Page 25: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
When is governance applied?
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 30
![Page 26: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
How – Practicalities System view of governance
Basic principles
Roles
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 31
![Page 27: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
February 2016
Wider System Boundry
WIDER SYSTEM
provides
resources and
legitimates
area of operation
formulates
initial
design of
makes known
expectations
supplies
performance
information
disturbsattempts
to influence
SYSTEM
Decision - makingsubsystem
decides ontransformationsimplementedby designstedset of
providesresourcesand legitimatesoperations
reports
to
expectationsknownmakes
provide
performance information
Subsystemsand components
that carry outtransformations
Performancemonitoringsubsystem
System Boundry
Environment Environment
The Formal System Paradigm
© Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 32
![Page 28: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Basic Principles - 1No GOPM Principle
1 The Board has overall responsibility for governance of PM
2 The organisation differentiates between project and non-project activities
3 Roles and responsibilities for governance of PM are clearly defined
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 33
![Page 29: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Basic Principle - 2
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 34
No GoPM Principle
4 Disciplined governance arrangements, supported by appropriate methods, resources & controls are applied throughout the project life cycle. Every project has a sponsor
5 There is a demonstrably coherent and supporting relationship between the overall business strategy & the project portfolio
6 All projects have an approved plan containing authorisation points at which the business case, including costs, benefits & risk are reviewed. Decisionsmade at decision points are recorded & communicated
![Page 30: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Basic Principles - 3No GoPM Principle
7 Members of delegated authorisation bodies have sufficient representation, competence, authority & resources to enable them to make appropriate decisions
8 Business cases are supported by relevant & realistic information that provides a reliable basis for making authorisation decisions
9 The Board or its delegated agents decide when independent scrutiny of projects or PM systems is required & implement such assurance accordingly
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 35
![Page 31: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Basic Principles – 4
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 36
No GoPM Principle
10 There are clearly defined criteria for reporting project status, escalation of risks and issues to appropriate levels in the organisation
11 The organisation fosters a culture of improvement & of frank internal disclosure of PM information
12 Stakeholders are engaged at a level commensurate with their importance to the organisation and in a way the fosters trust
![Page 32: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Basic Principles – 5No GoPM Principle
13 Projects are closed when they are no longer justified as part of the organisation’s portfolio
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 37
![Page 33: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
APM Core Components Portfolio Direction
Seeks to ensure that all projects are identified within one, sustainable portfolio. This portfolio should be evaluated and directed mindful of the organisation’s aims, constraints and capacity for change
Project SponsorshipSeeks to ensure that project sponsorship is effective
Project Management CapabilityAims to ensure that project teams are capable of achieving the objectives defined by the Firm
Disclosure and ReportingAims to achieve timely, accurate and relevant for decision making
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 38
![Page 34: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Who – Organisational LevelsStandard Developers:
Consultants – e.g. Big Four firms
The Firm – internally developed to meet own situation
Professional Bodies – APM, PMI, ACCA etc
Governmental Bodies – e.g. Financial Controls Authority (FCA)
Supra National Bodies – e.g. OECD, World Bank, UN etc
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 39
![Page 35: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Who is Involved? Board of Directors
Project Sponsor
Project Management Office
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 40
![Page 36: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Issues for Discussion1. What is the difference between governance of
projects and governance of project management?
2. What impact does the trend towards GOVERNACE have on the notion of profession in project management?
3. How does trust impact on Agency Theory?
4. How does Governance work in an AGILE development?
5. What governance issues arise when a CONSORTIUM operate a project?
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 41
![Page 37: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
ConclusionsGovernance is needed because of the nature of project
management, especially the ex ante issues of agency theory
Closely associated with Corporate Social Responsibility
Needs careful thought BEFORE embarking on a project.
Consider how portfolios of projects should be governed
Consortium projects require very careful consideration
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 48
![Page 38: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
ReferencesAPM (2011) Directing Change: a guide to governance of
project management. APM
APM (2012) Body of Knowledge (6th Edn). APM
APM (2007) Co-Directing Change – a guide to the governance of projects in multiple ownership. APM
PMI (2013) Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (5th Edn). PMI, Newtown Sq, USA
FCA (2014) UK Corporate Governance Code. Available at https://www.frc.org.uk accessed 2o Jan 15
ISO 21500:2012 Guidelines for Project Management. BSI, London
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 49
![Page 39: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
References – cont’dMüller, R. (2009) Project Governance. Gower, Farnham,
UK
Müller, R. (2011) Project Governance in Morris, P.G.W., Pinto, J.K. and Söderlund, J. (Eds) Oxford Handbook of Project Management (2011). OUP, Oxford, England
OECD (2015) Principles of Corporate Governance. Available on line at www.oecd.corporate. Accessed 12 Feb 16
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002). House: H.R. 3763, H. Rept. 107–414, H. Rept. 107–610
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 50
![Page 40: Governance in Project Environments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052601/628ccdba0b0a750327706bba/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
And finally…
February 2016 © Miles Shepherd Projects Ltd 51
Contact:Office 01722 341636Mobile 07709 490064 [email protected]