government furnished property end-to-end training presentations...government furnished property...
TRANSCRIPT
Presented by: Carol Vigna, DPAP PDI Colquitt “Quitty” Lawrence, AF/A4LR Mindy Rash-Gehres, ASN(RDA)/DASN ELM
Government Furnished Property End-to-End
PROCURE-TO-PAY DEFENSE PROCUREMENT AND ACQUISITION POLICY
TRAINING SYMPOSIUM
May 30 – June 1, 2017 ● Hyatt Regency Orlando FL 1
Accomplishments Synchronized the Property Policy Established GFP Working Group
• Meets quarterly • Contracting, Program Management, Logistics,
Financial Management, DCMA, Industry representatives
Published updated DFARS Property Policy in 2012 2 2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium
Synchronizing the Policy
DoDM 4140
Material/ Logistics
Equipment/ Accountability
Acquisition/ GFP
DoDM 4140 DoDI 5000.64
DoDI 4161.02
Published February 2014 Updated August 2015
Updated May 2017 Published April 2012
Policies based on 19 business rules ensuring consistency of policy and terminology across organizations
3 2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium 3
GFP E2E Policy and Guidance • FAR 52.245-1
» Establishes core GFP requirement • PGI 245.103-72
» Directs creation and inclusion of GFP Attachment • DFARS 252.211-7007
» Directs contractors to report receipt of ALL GFP » Requires updates for serially managed GFP
• DFARS 252.245-7001 through 7004 » Marking of GFP, Property Loss Tool, Contractor Property Management
System requirements, PCARSS (reutilization/disposal)
4 2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium 4
GFP Clause Compliance - FAR
5
2014-Q1 2014-Q2 2014-Q3 2014-Q4 2015-Q1 2015-Q2 2015-Q3 2015-Q4 2016-Q1 2016-Q2 2016-Q3 2016-Q4 2017-Q1 2017-Q2
Air Force 88% 88% 80% 81% 92% 93% 94% 89% 95% 97% 90% 86% 96% 95%
Army 83% 66% 79% 73% 84% 86% 81% 80% 76% 81% 78% 77% 76% 87%
DLA N/A* 50% N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* 0% N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A*
Marine Corps 75% 100% 86% 92% 0% 80% 100% 89% 67% 75% 67% 93% 100% 100%
Navy 83% 72% 76% 62% 86% 71% 78% 69% 84% 82% 80% 79% 86% 92%
ODA 60% 89% 93% 96% 100% 80% 93% 95% 50% 73% 87% 83% 95% 86%
Total 84% 75% 79% 74% 88% 81% 87% 82% 84% 86% 85% 81% 89% 91%
GFP FAR Clause 52.245-1 when Cost Reimbursable
*No cost-type contracts during the quarter.
Scorecard Goal Status Lower Upper
Green 92 100 Yellow 85 < 92 Red 0 < 85
5
New High
Score! 5 2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium
6
2014-Q1 2014-Q2 2014-3Q 2014-Q4 2015-Q1 2015-Q2 2015-Q3 2015-Q4 2016-Q1 2016-Q2 2016-Q3 2016-Q4 2017-Q1 2017-Q2
Air Force 38% 45% 57% 65% 67% 72% 73% 78% 89% 92% 91% 88% 90% 95%
Army 17% 16% 36% 32% 41% 41% 43% 44% 45% 57% 48% 45% 61% 48%
DLA 66% 33% 0% 13% 67% 0% 87% 95% 99% 97% 57% 61% 63% 63%
Marine Corps 7% 24% 30% 41% 14% 26% 16% 38% 83% 48% 46% 55% 45% 90%
Navy 20% 20% 33% 28% 40% 16% 72% 86% 97% 95% 86% 81% 92% 94%
ODA 19% 17% 48% 45% 54% 37% 58% 51% 55% 56% 66% 74% 77% 72%
Total 24% 23% 39% 38% 45% 21% 69% 77% 93% 88% 78% 70% 86% 85%
GFP DFARS Required Clauses (All contracts with FAR GFP Clause)
GFP Clause Compliance - DFARS
Scorecard Goal Status Lower Upper
Green 92 100 Yellow 85 < 92 Red 0 < 85
6 2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium 6
iRAPT MCA Contractor Receiver
Items received
IUID Registry
Items received Email notice
Property Accountability
GFP From DoD to Contractor
Property Transfer input can be manual web input or system electronic message
7
This step must happen even if DoD does not enter the shipment
Contract w/GFP
GFP Shipment Notification
Email Notice of Inbound GFP
MCA = Materiel Control Activity 2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium 7
GFP Attachment
GFP Data Flow Architecture
Contract Writing
EDA
IUID Registry
iRAPT GFP Property
Transfer
GFP list as XML
Record of property transfer
GFP Receipt & Shipment Notice Property Transfer
PCARSS/ PLT
Property loss or
disposal Component Accountable
Property Systems
Shipment Notice
Shipment Notice
Contract Deficiency Reports for missing GFP
terms or data DCMA
BI Reports of GFP Status
DLA
DLA
Note: DPAS Operational
DLA
GFP List (attachment
in fillable PDF - TBD
Industry
DoD (Materiel Control Activities)
DoD Supply System
Receipt
DLA
Operational
Distribution Standard System
(reparable return) DLA
Incremental deployment Future Capability
Requiring Systems
CDRs DCMA
8
Challenges • Contractor Acquired Property
– Two break-out sessions on this!
• End-to-End Process Execution • Contracting cannot do this alone- Team Sport!
– DCMA is Key
9 2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium
Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) • Air Force Material Weakness – June 2010
– AFAA Audit identified loss of accountability – Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR)
• Current Status – Accountability of 22,457 assets valued at $2.6B – Data call completed Jan-Apr 17 – Conducting analysis to ensure accuracy of data prior
to uploading in APSR – Begin establishing accountability – Jun 17 – FIAR testing this summer
11 2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium
GFE (cont’d) – Published GFE Process Guide – March 2016
• Provides step-by-step processes by functional area (Contracting/Program Office/Logistics/Contractor)
• Cross section of SME’s including OSD – Published Guidance Memorandum – April 2016
• Implemented Process Guide • Under review – ECD: June 2017
12 2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium
Government Furnished Materiel
• Air Force Material Weakness – Contractor Managed & Possessed Material -
June 2013 – No Accountable Property System of Record (APSR) – Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR)
• Current Status – Defense Property Accountability System (DPAS) selected as APSR
13 2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium
Government Furnished Materiel (cont’d) – Transactions identified and being added – DPAS modifications on track – ECD: October 2017 – Identification of all Programs – ECD: May 2017 – Currently reporting financial information via quarterly
data call – 30 Programs valued at $11B – Continue data call until DPAS automation – Contractor’s IT systems modifications under review
14 2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium
What’s Next? – Finalize and publish GFP Process Guide – Develop and publish Air Force GFP Policy Instruction – Population of Accountable Property Systems of Record – FIAR testing this summer – Ready for FIAR Audit
15 2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium
Department of Navy Government Furnished Property (GFP)
Accountability & Management GFP Status
Procure to Pay Training Symposium
1 June 2017 Mindy Rash-Gehres ODASN ELM
703-614-8000 [email protected]
GFP Requirements – in Broad Terms In order to be fully compliant, DON must execute & substantiate the following:
Government actions
All GFP FAR & DFARS clauses are in contract
All GFP is listed on GFP Attachment
All GFP is tracked in Government APSR
Contractor action directed by clause
All GFP is reported to OSD GFP Repository/ IUID Registry
All GFP is tracked in contractor’s system
17
Cross-Disciplinary Requirements FAR/DFARS
– KOs ensure proper clauses in contracts & solicitations – PMs determine requirement for GFP – Finance conducts FIAR testing against FAR/DFARS requirements
DoDI 4161.02 – “Accountability & Management of Government Contract Property” – KOs ensure GFP reporting clauses & lists are in contracts – PMs maintain accountability in DoD APSRs & GFP Repository – Finance reinforces internal controls through FIAR testing
DoDI 5000.64 – “Accountability & Management of DoD Equipment & Other Accountable Property” – KOs ensure “business rules for establishing receipt and acceptance” are in place (clauses) – PMs maintain accountability in APSR (contractor’s system is not a substitute) – Finance values at full cost (Capitalized) or acquisition cost (not Capitalized)
FIAR Guidance – Finance directs testing – PM/Log conduct inventories & corrective actions – KOs interface with contractor/execute mods as required by Corrective Action Plans
18 No new requirements!
Problem: How to gain accountability of government furnished property DON Approach:
1. Draw “line in the sand” (4 May 15) & get it right going forward 2. Review “legacy” contracts for compliance 3. Train & Educate Workforce 4. Establish SECNAV policy 5. Locate & record GFP in APSR 6. Update systems capabilities 7. HCAs & PEOs self report compliance 8. DASN FO/ DASN ELM test compliance 9. Address gaps & generate Corrective Action Plans
Revised DON GFP Accountability Strategy
19 GFP compliance is a multidisciplinary effort: no new requirements 19
Adde
d st
eps a
re b
old
Guidance – Issued 3 memos to underscore requirements & provide direction
• May 2015: Required review of existing contracts & new contracts using GFP checklist • Dec 2015: Acknowledged progress made & requested HCAs identify audit challenges • Sept 2016: Identified priorities & schedule for data entry; reiterated requirements
– Attend OSD GFP WG & bring back guidance – Convene Monthly DON GFP WG (March 2015) to share lessons learned
Education/Training – Conducted 32 DASN ELM/DASN FO GFP Outreach sessions – Established local training
Policy – Updated NMCARS* to require GFP checklist & quarterly reports – Created SECNAV GFP policy: ready for SECNAV signature process – Developed local instructions
Tools – Drove key system changes to major APSRs – Developed metric/report to measure clause compliance – Added GFP as Special Interest Item to formal contract oversight process
DON GFP Accomplishments
*NMCARS = Navy Marine Corps Acquisition Regulation Supplement
DON Clause Compliance
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2QFY15 3QFY15 4QFY15 1QFY16 2QFY16 3QFY16 4QFY16 1QFY17 2QFY1752.245-1 DFARS
21
92% FAR 94% DFARS
DON GFE Metrics
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
Jun-15 Sep-15 Dec-15 Mar-16 Jun-16 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17
Tota
l con
trac
ts
Tota
l lin
e ite
ms
GFP Repository
Serially Managed Items Non-Serially Managed items Total Contracts 22
* GFP repository only captures Acquisition value for UII items. Repository data as of 31 Mar 2017. Data includes GFE + GFM.
Total GFP Capital GFE Only In APSR In Repository In APSR In Repository
DON Total Items 3,096,178 513,842 1,362 5,848
DON Total Value * $1,621.70 M $93,274.93 M $813.66 M $48,056.80 M
GFP Challenges Culture Shift
– PEO/PM had not been held responsible to validate GFP requirements – GFP is a team sport – requirements cross community boundaries
Personnel / Time – Competing FIAR Priorities – Validation/error correction is time consuming – Personnel already fully tasked – these are additional duties – Property management role distributed throughout Program Office – Data entry expected to be labor intensive process – efforts prioritized for Capitalized GFP highest
Cost – Contract cost may increase with no growth in warfighting capabilities – Maintaining records that the contractor is already paid to keep is duplicative & costly
IT System Shortfalls – APSR: GFP tracking capabilities/interfaces to OSD systems – Cost & schedule to identify, develop & implement changes to incorporate requirements is prohibitive
Discovery Ongoing 23
DON Way Ahead Promulgate SECNAVINSTs Continue DON Working Groups
– Share lessons learned/best practices – Address issues
Analyze reports & metrics Continue discovery Test compliance We’re making progress: more work to be done 24
Supply
Property Accountability
Financial
Maintenance
Receipt and Acceptance
Procurement
Government Furnished Property Business Management Environment
Quality Assurance
25